From ENIAC to ECSEL: challenges and opportunities

Transcription

1 From ENIAC to ECSEL: challenges and opportunities Andreas Wild Executive Director European Nanoelectronics Forum, Cannes,

2 Content European snapshot FP7 progress: ARTEMIS+ENIAC JUs H2020 Strategy: ECSEL JU Way to the future Next Steps

3 From excellent science to products Economy of Scale: smaller features + larger wafers = diminishing cost Feature Size (nm) Wafer Size (mm) Average Transistor Cost ITRS 2012 Edition: Table ORTC-7 Cost (at production) bel1 n$: -DRAM bit : $0.8n in Transistor in MPU : $0.95n in 2021 In 2014, for the first time a component cost < 1n$: nanoelectronics!

4 European Snapshot Reversing the Trend CapEx per Headquarter Region Market Share of the Leading Companies Headquartered in Europe Positive signs! -The market share decay slowed down - Some companies actually gained market share and improved ranking - Merger and acquisition activities point in the right direction

5 European Snapshot Installed Wafer Capacity <= 200mm 300mm $17B $14.7B $14.7B $6B $170B in 5 10 years ELG Roadmap? Million 200mm equivalent wafers per year Investments Announced in 2014:

6 FP7: ARTEMIS+ENIAC Cluster participation in ARTEMIS + ENIAC Projects Leading European Clusters

7 FP7: ARTEMIS+ENIAC Joint Undertakings Inventing KET Pilot Line Projects under FP7 (Technology Readiness Level: 4 8) Eligible Costs 11 NO B eligible costs 338 participations 23 countries TR 13 IL

8 FP7: ARTEMIS+ENIAC Payments Executed by ARTEMIS and ENIAC JUs Status as of end of September 2014

9 H2020: ECSEL ELECTRONICS APPLICATIONS ECSEL Ecosystem Materials Equipment Design Automation IP Blocks ECSEL JU Wafer processing Assembly and Test Embedded Software System Integration European strategic necessities: Without state of the art semiconductor technology, Europe will depend entirely on importation (ENIAC JU) Without embedded software functionality, chips are useless, fabs are unsustainable (ARTEMIS JU) Without smart integration in systems, no economic and societal benefits are possible (ETP EPoSS) ENIAC + ARTEMIS + EPoSS = ECSEL

10 H2020: ECSEL Budget Evolution from ARTEMIS + ENIAC to ECSEL Increased average funding, but short term issue!

11 H2020: ECSEL Budgeting for JUs in H2020 R & I 860M ICT 873M 819M 115M Percentage of the Industrial Leadership Policy Implemented through JUs

12 H2020: ECSE L ECSEL JU: an Inclusive Programme Permeating virtually all industrial branches and aspects of societal life Bringing together Union, Participating States and the private sector Allowing participation of large and small countries, of regions Supporting the whole ecosystem: Sequoia (large) Normal trees (medium-sized) Bushes (small) Grass-root innovation (institutional / academic research) Naturally able to combine funding sources (e.g.h2020+esif)

13 Way to the future ECSEL JU: a Mechanism Suitable for Combining Funding Industry CATRENE, ITEA3, ΣURIPIDES2, CELTIC+, EUROGIA+, ACQUEA, National Programmes EUREKA Clusters JTIs /JUs BBI, Clean Sky, FCH, IMI Contractual PPPs FP7/H2020 Calls EeB, FoF, SPIRE, EGVI, Photonics, Robotics, HPC, 5G Member States 5 FPPs in 2014 Smart Specialization ESIF/ERDF Regions

14 Combining Way to the funding future Synergy H2020 ESIF in ECSEL Working with the leaders: excellence-convergence synergy Basic condition: no double funding Detailed how-to : ECSEL Guide for Applicants 2014 Case 1: An ECSEL project may include ESI Funds to support: - One or more participants - One or more cost items ESIF can be awarded when all pre-conditions are met 2014 Full Project Proposals needed ESIF risk mitigation plan Case 2: ESIF can be used for subsequent actions or Case 3: ESIF can be used for parallel actions

15 Way to the future Co-Funding Possibilities 3. Parallel ESIF Private: >50%* ECSEL National:25%* EU: 25%* 1. R&I Phase 2. Subsequent ESIF Industrial Phase *: percentages for illustration only, actual value will vary according to different criteria 15

16 Way to the future Further Actions Needed Define IA in H2020 commensurate with the industrial needs Contribute to the definition and implementation of the Important Project of Common European Interest Engage with funding mechanisms in areas relying on smart technologies (Energy, Food, Security etc.) Position to win in the mid-term EU budget negotiations

17 Next Steps Status of the On-going Calls and 2015 Plans 2014 Status: Evaluation/Selection by Mid-December Expressions of Interest: 75 EoIs: 58 RIA, 17 IA 3.3 B eligible costs Full Project Proposals 48 FPPs: 34 RIA, 14 IA (Pilot Lines) 1.7 B total eligible costs 2015 Prospective plans 2 Calls in parallel: RIA IA 2 phases: PO (eliminatory) FPP Launch: end of February PO deadline: beginning of May FPP deadline: first half September Funding decision: first half December

18 Thank you for your attention!