GUIDELINES FOR PROGRAM REVIEW AND ACADEMIC PLANNING
|
|
- Dortha Lewis
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Page 1 of 8 LOYOLA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES` IN-DEPTH PROGRAM REVIEWS The process of evaluation is an important ingredient of any successful academic program. Periodic evaluations provide a mechanism for a department or program to assess how well it is accomplishing its objectives, fulfilling the goals of the college and university, and satisfying the needs of its students. Such evaluations can also assist individual programs in identifying and overcoming areas of weaknesses, in obtaining necessary support, and in planning for future changes in student needs and services. Furthermore, a regular evaluative process can help ensure that each academic program provides a curriculum which is both substantive and innovative, which is up-to-date and consistent with current practice in its discipline, which meets Loyola's standards of excellence, and which conforms to Loyola's liberal and Jesuit traditions. Too often, however, the evaluation of academic programs has been confined to self-studies, relying on departments to evaluate themselves, often without the benefit of outside examination. As a result, such self-studies are frequently designed more to make a favorable impression than to identify weaknesses and overcome problems. It is the conviction of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools that the university is better served by an on-going, cyclical process allowing regular, in-depth evaluation of each academic program. The evaluation of all academic departments and programs will be scheduled so that each department and program is evaluated once every five years. This allows for a complete evaluation cycle between each SACS visit, and requires that three or four departments or programs be evaluated each academic year. The evaluation team shall include a chair selected from the same area as the program or department being evaluated (i.e., arts & humanities, social science, science); one faculty member from an area related to that of the department/program being evaluated; one faculty member from a non-related area; and, when appropriate, one evaluation consultant from the same discipline as the department or program being evaluated but from another college or university. Members of the team will be selected by the dean in consultation with the department or program and with the college curriculum committee. GUIDELINES FOR PROGRAM REVIEW AND ACADEMIC PLANNING The first phase of the review and planning process is conducted by the department or program itself. The intention is that through this review the department or program will identify for itself the extent to which it fulfills the mission and educational goals of the university and is moving forward its own, the college's, the division's and the university's plans. Planning will give the department or program an opportunity to establish objectives and the appropriate short-term tactics, and longer range strategies, to achieve those objectives given realistic resource allocation and institutional support. The completed Program Review and Academic Plan should be a cohesive document and conclude with a prioritized list of objectives complete with short-term tactics (up to one year) and longer term strategies (3-5 years) and action plans to achieve those objectives.
2 Page 2 of 8 Specific Items to be Included I. Introduction: a brief statement setting the stage for what is to follow. It might include such items as: a brief overview of the department or program, its history, important changes or developments since the last evaluation, highlights of the review and plan. II. Review & Revise III. Mission Statement and Educational Goals. Each department or program should develop its own Mission Statement and Educational Goals consistent with it discipline and/or students served, with the mission and educational goals of the college and university, and with the college's and university's plans. Include specific contributions to the mission and educational goals of the university and the college's and university's plans, such as participation in the common curriculum, student support services, major/minor design, contributions to a liberal education, pre-professional and professional programs, and/or pertinent information regarding preparation of students for job placements or graduate/professional schools. Included in this statement should be an analysis of the market niche and/or the educational need for the department or program. Curriculum. The following questions are intended to elicit a comprehensive discussion of curricular activities, but they are not necessarily all-inclusive. Evaluation teams are welcome to add specific questions of their own, and departments and programs are welcome to raise issues which are not covered by these questions. 1. What are the goals and objectives of your curriculum? What rationale do you offer in support of these goals and objectives? How are these goals and objectives related to the goals and objectives of Loyola University? What differences do you perceive between your goals and those of the college or university? 2. In what specific ways does your curriculum work to achieve the goals and objectives of Loyola University and those of your department or program? What methods do you use to assess how well these goals and objectives are being achieved? What results have you obtained? 3. Provide the following data related to your program and discuss trends in the data and what it means for your program. Department/Program Student Credit Hours (SCH): In Dept SCH (U&G) Out of Dept SCH (U&G) Total
3 Page 3 of 8 Undergraduate SCH Graduate SCH (N.B. Sum of Graduate and Undergraduate SCH should equal sum of In-Dept and Out-of-Dept SCH) Program/Major Headcount Enrollment Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Headcount i. What are the growth prospects for the next three years? (Cite Available Sources) THIS ii. What factors will influence enrollment growth or decline? Program Degree Productivity Degree/Program # of Degrees Granted THIS i. What is the expected demand for graduates for the next three years? ii. What are the sources of these projections? 4. What do you regard as a) the strong points, b) the weak points of your curriculum? In what ways would you like to see your curriculum strengthened? 5. Explain how your curriculum conforms to current practice in your discipline. What changes have you made in the past five years, either to strengthen your curriculum or to shift its emphasis? What changes do you anticipate in the near future? Explain the rationale for these changes.
4 Page 4 of 8 THIS 6. Does your department/program offer internships? If so, how are internships obtained and how are students selected for internships? Are internships paid or unpaid? In what ways does pay or lack of thereof affect the quality of the internship experience. What are your procedures for faculty supervision of interns, for ensuring the quality of the internship experience, and for obtaining feedback about the interns' performance? What requirements (e.g., number of hours worked per credit, written work, etc.) are placed on your interns? 7. What percentage of your students goes on to graduate school? Professional certification? Professional school? What other career activities do your graduates pursue? Have any of your graduates been rejected for graduate school or professional certification because of the nature of your curriculum? Explain. 8. Explain how each course in your department's list of major courses fits into the developmental sequence of your discipline. Describe your method of rotating courses to ensure that majors or minors can complete their requirements without undue difficulty. 9. For what reasons do you permit waivers of required courses (or other requirements, e.g., GPA or pre-requisites) in your department or program? Which requirements are waived? How frequently have waivers been granted in the past five years? THIS 10. In which areas have institutional rules and procedures impeded your efforts to provide a balanced and effective curriculum? What changes would you like to see made? Explain. 11. What kinds of support does your department or program provide to other departments and programs? What kinds of support do you receive from others? What inadequacies do you perceive in this area? What (changes or improvements would you favor? 12. Explain your student advisement mechanism. What sort of career guidance do you provide. 13. Explain how evaluation of teaching is used to improve instruction.?????? 14. Explain how the department's or program's grade distribution pattern over the last five years relates to the mission and educational goals of the university and department and the university's and college's plans.
5 Page 5 of 8 IV. Scholarly Productivity (Summarize the number of publications (books, articles in refereed journals, and creative works) related to the program for the last three years. Document and comment on the quality of the scholarly activity, including a frame of reference on productivity in the discipline) Books: Papers, Patents, and Technical Briefs: Presentations: V. Resources Program Faculty Profile Full-time: Tenure Hire Name Rank Status Gender Ethnicity Date Extraordinary: Name Credit Hours Taught Part-time: Name Credit Hours Taught
6 Page 6 of 8 Program Base Budget Resources ( ) 1. Full-time Faculty Salaries (Number) $ 2. Staff Salaries (Number) $ 3. Graduate Assistantships (Number) $ 4. Extraordinary Faculty Salaries (Number) $ 5. Part-time Faculty Salaries (Number) $ 6. Other Personnel $ 7. Student Assistant monies $ 8. Operating Budget $ 9. Travel funds provided by Dean s Office $ Total $ Program Library Expenditures ( ) Books Serials Total Need this data Frank?? a. Is the current funding adequate to accomplish program goals and objectives? If not, why not? b. Can program costs be reduced? If so, where and by how much? c. What additional resources, if any, would be required to achieve program goals and objectives? 1. Discuss strengths and weaknesses of departmental or program staffing. THIS!!! 2. Discuss the adequacy of your facilities for achieving missions and goals. 3. Discuss the adequacy of your budget for achieving missions and goals. 4. Discuss the adequacy of the library holdings for the department or program, including such matters as currency of holdings. 5. Discuss relationships with support services and the effectiveness of those services.
7 Page 7 of 8 VI. Quality Assessments. This section explores areas of quality assessment for departments and programs. It must include linkages to missions, goals and transformations, either actual or intended. This section should include: 1. Results of student interviews and questionnaires. 2. Progress report on recommendations from any previous evaluations; progress report on department's or program's meeting its own goals and targets. 3. Identification of joint efforts between the department or program and other departments or programs to fulfill the university, division, college or department's or program's missions and goals. Review & Revise ALL of this Exit Interv. etc 4. on progress being made toward measurable course objectives, student learning outcomes, exit exams, etc. 5. Alumni survey results. 6. Departmental or program efforts in areas of student recruitment, retention, advising, and any special efforts directed toward freshmen. 7. Description and evaluation of department or program efforts in such areas as producing special program, enhancing student life, sponsoring organizations, certifications, etc. 8. Identification of department or program weaknesses with causes and with corrective steps taken. 9. Indicators of departmental or program excellence (awards, grants, students on dean's list, publications, etc.). VII. Governance. Are the department's or program's administrative and governance structures appropriate and effective. VIII. Plan. THIS!!! 1. Make a prioritized list of departmental or program objectives or goals for the next five years. Justify each objective in relation to university and college missions and goals. Include objectives for quality enhancement. 2. Note the short-term tactics, long-term strategies, and action plans to achieve each objective. 3. Discuss what resources will be needed to achieve each objective (new faculty, additional staff, equipment, space, increased budget, etc.).
8 Page 8 of 8 THIS!!! 4. Discuss what impact, if any, each objective will have on various administrative support areas including library, computer facilities, physical facilities, registrar's office, student life, financial aid, admissions, advising, and business office. 5. Progress towards the achievement of approved objectives should be included in the department's or program's annual report to the dean.
SELF-STUDY FORMAT FOR REVIEW OF EXISTING DEGREE PROGRAMS
SELF-STUDY FORMAT FOR REVIEW OF EXISTING DEGREE PROGRAMS Although programs engage in continual self-assessment and review of their work, periodic program reviews are designed to provide a broader view
More informationGuidelines for Conducting an APR Self-Study
Academic Program Reviews Guidelines for Conducting a Self-Study [Revised January 2014; available at http://academicplanning.gwu.edu/academic-program-reviews] The self-study is the vital initial element
More informationSELF-STUDY GUIDELINES. Part I: Program History, Mission, and Administrative Structure
SELF-STUDY GUIDELINES Part I: Program History, Mission, and Administrative Structure I.1 Program History Briefly describe the historical development of the program and associated components. I.2 Mission
More informationEvaluation of Undergraduate Academic Programs. Self-Study Guidelines
Evaluation of Undergraduate Academic Programs Self-Study Guidelines Office of the Provost Fall 2009 Purpose This guide is designed to support academic unit efforts to evaluate undergraduate academic programs
More informationTHE SELF STUDY DOCUMENT For Undergraduate Only Departmental Reviews
I. The Department/Unit (or Program) II. Resources University at Buffalo Comprehensive Program Reviews The Graduate School THE SELF STUDY DOCUMENT For Undergraduate Only Departmental Reviews A. Mission
More informationTexas A&M University-Kingsville. College of Graduate Studies. Graduate Council. Doctoral Program External Review. Self-Study Instrument AY 2008
Texas A&M University-Kingsville College of Graduate Studies Graduate Council Doctoral Program External Review Self-Study Instrument AY 2008 (revised fall 2007) Texas A&M University-Kingsville College of
More informationTexas A&M University-Kingsville. College of Graduate Studies. Graduate Council. Doctoral Program Review Instrument
Texas A&M University-Kingsville College of Graduate Studies Graduate Council Doctoral Program Review Instrument Texas A&M University-Kingsville College of Graduate Studies Doctoral Program Review Instrument
More informationIona College. Comprehensive Academic Program Review
1 Iona College Comprehensive Academic Program Review I. Introduction The Comprehensive Academic Program Review Project Team was charged to: Finalize the five-year program review policy; establish the cycle
More informationHow To Write A Doctoral Program Proposal
Guidelines for Institutions Submitting Proposals for New Doctoral Programs Reminder: These guidelines are intended to further clarify the information needed for the Doctoral Program Request Form. All proposals
More informationNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY. The Graduate School. Graduate Degree Program Review. Revised Format for the Self-Study Report
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Graduate Degree Program Review Revised Format for the Self-Study Report Instructions: Designed for the eight-year review of graduate degree programs,
More informationTemplate for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic)
Template for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic) Standard One: Mission and Goals, Planning and Effectiveness
More informationGRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW POLICY. Texas Southern University
GRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW POLICY Texas Southern University The Purposes of Graduate Program Review Graduate program review at Texas Southern University exists to ensure that programs are functioning at the
More informationAccelerated Graduate Degree Programs Proposal Template
Accelerated Graduate Degree Programs Proposal Template Overview. This template was created to: 1) provide a general overview of the basic elements of accelerated graduate degree programs at the University
More informationPart III. Self-Study Report Template
Part 3 Ministry Of Education And Higher Education Directorate General of Higher Education Part III Self-Study Report Template LABE SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE http://www.labe.org.lb General Instructions Introduction
More informationTemplate for Academic Standards Committee Review
Template for Academic Committee Review The numbered titles in this document that appear in boldface print represent the standards being evaluated as met, not met, or partially met on the Program Report
More informationA. Accreditation If doctoral-level accreditation is not available but is projected to become so within the next five years, please indicate.
Guidelines for Institutions Submitting Proposals for New Doctoral Programs Reminder: These guidelines are intended to further clarify the information needed for the Doctoral Program Request Form. All proposals
More informationBOARD OF GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF FLORIDA NEW DOCTORAL DEGREE PROPOSAL STAFF ANALYSIS
BOARD OF GOVERRS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF FLORIDA NEW DOCTORAL DEGREE PROPOSAL STAFF ANALYSIS Program: Doctor of Social Work CIP Code: 51.1503 Institution: Florida Atlantic University Proposed Implementation
More informationItawamba Community College Program Review Career-Technical and Health Science Programs
Itawamba Community College Program Review Career-Technical and Health Science Programs I. Program Information 1. Name of Program Computer Networking Technology 2. Submission Date of Program Review 6/21/2012
More informationGUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 GRADUATE PROGRAMS
GUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 GRADUATE PROGRAMS OVERVIEW OF PROGRAM REVIEW At Illinois State University, primary responsibility
More informationUniversity of Richmond
University of Richmond http://facultyhandbook.richmond.edu/ch_iii/index.html#discontinuance E. Procedures for the Discontinuance of an Academic Department or Program of Instruction Involving Possible Dismissal
More informationTexas Higher Education Coordinating Board New Doctoral Degree Proposal
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board New Doctoral Degree Proposal Directions: While completing this form, institutions should refer to Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 5.46 relating to Criteria for
More informationThe University of North Texas at Dallas Policy Manual
The University of North Texas at Dallas Policy Manual Chapter 6.000 6.020 Academic Program Review Faculty Affairs Policy Statement. UNT Dallas offers high-quality academic programs that are achieved through
More informationGraduate Program Resource Manual
Graduate Program Resource Manual To assist programs in their efforts to ensure effective educational programs, continuous improvement and staying in compliance with accreditation requirements. Prepared
More informationDepartment of History Policy 1.1. Faculty Evaluation. Evaluation Procedures
Approved: 2/23/099 Department of History Policy 1.1 Faculty Evaluation Evaluation Procedures 1. The Department of History will evaluate all tenured and non-tenure faculty by March 1 of each academic year
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR DOCUMENT 102 SELF STUDY (A STAND-ALONE DOCUMENT; NOT INTENDED TO BE A PART OF A DOCUMENT 102)
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR DOCUMENT 102 SELF STUDY (A STAND-ALONE DOCUMENT; NOT INTENDED TO BE A PART OF A DOCUMENT 102) Context of Accreditation in the United States Program accreditation is both a
More informationProgram Review Document Department of Accounting
Program Review Document Department of Accounting A. Summarized Review of Degree Program Report 1. Mission, Centrality, and Uniqueness The mission of the Department of Accounting at Kansas State University
More informationAcademic Program Review SUMMARY*
Academic Program Review SUMMARY* Department under review: Physician s Assistant Program Date self-study received in Dean s office: August 2012 Date of external consultant s review: April 2010 Date APR
More informationPolicies and Procedures for Undergraduate Certificate Programs
A. Introduction Policies and Procedures for Undergraduate Certificate Programs Undergraduate certificate programs may be created within the structure of undergraduate academic units. Students may be awarded
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTANCY ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TAXATION (M.S.T.) DEGREE
DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTANCY ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TAXATION (M.S.T.) DEGREE I. Department Mission II. Program Learning Goals and Objectives III. Methods to Evaluate Effectiveness In support
More informationUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS PROCEDURES FOR UNIVERSITY APPROVAL OF NEW ACADEMIC DEGREE PROGRAMS, PROGRAM CHANGES, AND PROGRAM TERMINATION
Doc. T92-012, as amended Passed by the BoT 4/8/92 Revised 8/6/97 UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS PROCEDURES FOR UNIVERSITY APPROVAL OF NEW ACADEMIC DEGREE PROGRAMS, PROGRAM CHANGES, AND PROGRAM TERMINATION
More information0. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
0. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION DATA SUPPLIED BY PROGRAM Official U of S Program URL: Provide the URL for the graduate program, or department website that introduces the graduate degree, and provides information
More informationFLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN 2010-2020
FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN 2010-2020 JUNE 2010 INTRODUCTION Mission Statement The College of Education stands as the cornerstone of Florida A&M University. With the University
More informationDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) Bylaws for Program Structure
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) Bylaws for Program Structure I. Mission and Objectives: The mission of the University of Kansas Department of Electrical Engineering and
More informationStaff Analysis Checklist Request to Offer a New Degree Program. Board of Governors, State University System of Florida
Staff Analysis Checklist Request to Offer a New Degree Program Board of Governors, State University System of Florida University Submitting Proposal Initial Review Date Proposed Implementation Term Last
More informationSTANDARDS AND REQUIRED ELEMENTS FOR ACCREDITATION OF PHYSICAL THERAPIST EDUCATION PROGRAMS (Revised 11/11/15)
Standard 1 The program meets graduate achievement measures and program outcomes related to its mission and goals. REQUIRED ELEMENTS: 1A The mission 1 of the program is written and compatible with the mission
More information9. ACADEMIC QUALITY PLANNING PROCESS AND OUTCOME ASSESSMENT
Page 1 of 32 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITATION OF POSTSECONDARY CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION DEGREE PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. GOVERNANCE AND ADMINISTRATION 3. CURRICULUM 4. FACULTY
More informationTerry College of Business Strategic Plan
Terry College of Business Strategic Plan The mission of the University of Georgia s Terry College of Business is the pursuit and dissemination of knowledge for the effective and ethical practice of business.
More informationLaney Graduate School Curricular Revision Guidelines. Updated September 2012
Laney Graduate School Curricular Revision Guidelines Updated September 2012 Contents 1. Courses... 3 1.1. Credit Hour Determination... 3 1.2. Revisions to Existing Courses... 3 1.3. New Course Proposals...
More informationThe National Communication Association s Standards for Undergraduate Communication Programs Updated April, 2011
The National Communication Association s Standards for Undergraduate Communication Programs Updated April, 2011 A variety of disciplinary organizations have developed specialized accreditation standards
More informationAcademic Program Review Handbook
Handbook Continuously Improving Programs and Student Learning Revised July 2014 Original Issue: December 6, 2010 Approved: Derry Connolly, President Current Issue: July 3, 2014 Effective: July 3, 2014
More informationMFT Educational Outcomes Assessment Schedule
1 MFT Educational Outcomes Assessment Schedule Item or Area for Evaluation Measurement Instrument Assessment Cycle PO1. Recruit, train, and graduate students from diverse backgrounds PO2. Graduates students
More informationCommission on Peer Review and Accreditation
Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration ACCREDITATION STANDARDS For Master s degree programs Adopted October 16, 2009 at the NASPAA
More informationTexas Higher Education Coordinating Board New Doctoral Degree Proposal
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board New Doctoral Degree Proposal Directions: While completing this form, institutions should refer to Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 5.46 relating to Criteria for
More informationFORMAL PROPOSAL FOR A NEW DEGREE PROGRAM and DISTANCE LEARNING DELIVERY (Program is New and Institution Currently Offers Distance Learning Programs)
FORMAL PROPOSAL FOR A NEW DEGREE PROGRAM and DISTANCE LEARNING DELIVERY (Program is New and Institution Currently Offers Distance Learning Programs) Form 3A Institution: Georgia Southwestern State University
More informationACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW:
CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY Office of Planning, Assessment and Research ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW: Self-Study Report Template OPAR 2012 5th Year Cycle ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW 20-20 School Self-Study Report
More informationTexas Southern University
Texas Southern University College of Education Bylaws 2012 [Type text] 2 College of Education Bylaws Preamble Texas Southern University was founded in 1927 and became a state institution in 1947. Texas
More informationASSOCIATE DEAN OF NURSING, BYRDINE F. LEWIS CHAIR (Salary Range $130,000 to $160,000)
ASSOCIATE DEAN OF NURSING, BYRDINE F. LEWIS CHAIR (Salary Range $130,000 to $160,000) Job Description: The Associate Dean is the program administrator of the School of Nursing appointed by the Dean of
More informationMPH Program Policies and Procedures Manual
MPH Program Policies and Procedures Manual Curriculum and Advising Academic Advising Academic advisors are appointed by the chairs, in consultation with the MPH Director Curriculum Decisions All changes
More informationASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TAXATION (M.S.T.) DEGREE OCTOBER 2012
ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TAXATION (M.S.T.) DEGREE OCTOBER 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTANCY ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TAXATION (M.S.T.) DEGREE I. Department Mission II. Program
More informationPROCEDURES Doctoral Academic Program Review California State University, Stanislaus
PROCEDURES Doctoral Academic Program Review California State University, Stanislaus Self Study Elements for Academic Program Review for Doctoral Programs Program Improvement from Last Academic Program
More informationFORMAT FOR APR COMMITTEE REPORTS TO THE FACULTY SENATE
FORMAT FOR APR COMMITTEE REPORTS TO THE FACULTY SENATE 1. The Academic Program Review (APR) Committee makes recommendations about each program that it reviews in written reports to the Faculty Senate.
More informationDraft Policy on Graduate Education
Draft Policy on Graduate Education Preface/Introduction Over the past two decades, the number and types of graduate programs have increased dramatically. In particular, the development of clinical master
More information2011 Outcomes Assessment Accreditation Handbook
2011 Outcomes Assessment Accreditation Handbook Associate Degree Programs Baccalaureate Degree Programs Master Degree Programs Accreditation Policies can be found in a separate document on the ATMAE website
More informationCriteria for Approval of Foreign Semester and Year-Long Study Abroad Programs Established by ABA-Approved Law Schools
Criteria for Approval of Foreign Semester and Year-Long Study Abroad Programs Established by ABA-Approved Law Schools Preamble The Council has adopted three sets of Criteria applicable to study abroad:
More informationDepartment of Accounting, Finance, & Economics
Department of Accounting, Finance, & Economics Assessment Report 2010-2011 Mission/Purpose The mission of the Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics is to provide a quality education in accounting,
More informationFaculty Handbook 2008-2009
POLICY ON SABBATICAL LEAVES I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROGRAM A sabbatical 1 provides full-time members of the teaching faculty the opportunity to pursue research and study programs that contribute to their
More informationSociology Five Year Program Review/Planning Document December 2, 2008. Section I. Mission and Goals
Sociology Five Year Program Review/Planning Document December 2, 2008 Section I. Mission and Goals The Mission of OTC The mission of Ozarks Technical Community College is to promote student learning through
More informationEVALUATION OF DEPARTMENT CHAIR
EVALUATION OF DEPARTMENT CHAIR Background This document is developed based on the Office of Academic Affairs Memorandum No. 05-3 (OAAM 05-3) document. In that document, the department chair s responsibilities
More informationMASTER OF LIBERAL STUDIES
MASTER OF LIBERAL STUDIES WASHBURN UNIVERSITY MASTER OF LIBERAL STUDIES Advisory Committee Dr. Bruce Mactavish, Associate Dean, College of Arts and Sciences, Director Dr. Ross Friesen, Assistant Professor,
More informationReview of the M.A., M.S. in Psychology 42.0101
Review of the M.A., M.S. in Psychology 42.0101 Overview of the program. The M.A., M.S. in Psychology program is housed in the Department of Psychology within the College of Arts and Sciences. Other programs
More informationApplying to Graduate School Frequently Asked Questions 1. What are the differences between Master s, PhD, and MFA programs?
1 Applying to Graduate School Frequently Asked Questions 1. What are the differences between Master s, PhD, and MFA programs? The main difference between master s and doctoral programs has to do with the
More informationI. MISSION STATEMENT
Marriage and Family Therapy Internship Manual 2014-2015 1 I. MISSION STATEMENT The Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) program s mission is to foster highly qualified professionals who possess the knowledge,
More informationTransfer Dictionary Academic Advisor Academic Affairs Academic Program Admissions Advanced Placement Courses (AP) Application Applied Degree
Transfer Dictionary Academic Advisor Academic advisors assist students in defining and reaching their academic and career goals. All degree-seeking, undergraduate students are assigned to an academic advisor.
More informationBoard of Governors, State University System of Florida
Board of Governors, State University System of Florida Request to Offer a New Degree Program (Please do not revise this proposal format without prior approval from Board staff) University Submitting Proposal
More informationNew Program Request Form for Bachelor s and Master s Degrees
New Program Request Form for Bachelor s and Master s Degrees Directions: An institution shall use this form to propose a new bachelor s or master s degree program that is in the field of engineering or
More informationFrequency of Assessment. Every three years and at any time of change of mission/philo sophy of the parent institution or the program.
BSN PROGRAM CCNE Standard I: The mission, philosophy, and expected outcomes of the program are congruent with those of the parent institution, reflect professional nursing standards and guidelines, and
More informationIII. Standards for Accreditation of Graduate Education Programs in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology
III. Standards for Accreditation of Graduate Education Programs in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Effective January 1, 2008 Introduction The Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and
More informationDEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP)
Approved by Academic Affairs May 2010 DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP) I. DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING RTP POLICY A. Preamble B.
More informationHUMANITIES. 18 Characteristics of Texas Public Doctoral Programs - UT Dallas. PhD http://www.utdallas.edu/ah/programs/graduate/index.
18 Characteristics of Texas Public Doctoral Programs - UT Dallas Program 1 Degree awarded Program Web site UT Dallas - 18 Characteristics of Texas Public Schools HUMANITIES PhD http://www.utdallas.edu/ah/programs/graduate/index.html
More informationAcademic Program Review SELF-STUDY TEMPLATE
Academic Program Review SELF-STUDY TEMPLATE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Program Overview... 3 A. Introduction and Historical Context... 3 B. Relationship to Mission and Strategic Plan... 3 C. Program Description...
More informationGuidelines for External Reviews of Academic Departments and Programs
Guidelines for External Reviews of Academic Departments and Programs This document contains information for departments and programs conducting external reviews, including: 1. Guidelines for external reviews
More informationGuidelines for Preparing New Graduate Program Proposals
Guidelines for Preparing New Graduate Program Proposals The New Programs and Program Review Committee of the Graduate Council recommends that the originators of proposals for new graduate programs follow
More informationHealth Informatics 2010. Master s Degree. Standards and Interpretations for Accreditation of Master s Degree Programs in Health Informatics
Health Informatics 2010 Master s Degree Standards and Interpretations for Accreditation of Master s Degree Programs in Health Informatics Who We Are The Commission on Accreditation for Health Informatics
More informationAfter the Visit Report: Template for External Reviewer
After the Visit Report: Template for External Reviewer In writing their report, the external reviewer should focus on the issues that relate to the major, the academic discipline, and the preparation and
More informationDEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENTAL PROCEDURES, CRITERIA, AND BYLAWS Approved 2/98
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENTAL PROCEDURES, CRITERIA, AND BYLAWS Approved 2/98 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction... 2 II. III. IV. The Chairperson...2 Chairperson
More information1. Centrality/Importance to University s Mission
Program Prioritization Report Tier III Undergraduate College of Health Sciences, Department of Health, Leisure & Exercise Science Exercise Science Undergraduate Program (with concentrations in Pre-Professional,
More informationSELECTING & APPLYING TO GRADUATE SCHOOL
SELECTING & APPLYING TO GRADUATE SCHOOL Graduate and professional school opportunities are very diverse. If you are interested in a specific field of study or career field, exploring educational opportunities
More informationHIM 2008. Master s Degree. Standards and Interpretations for Accreditation of Master s Degree Programs in Health Information Management
HIM 2008 Master s Degree Standards and Interpretations for Accreditation of Master s Degree Programs in Health Information Management Who We Are The Commission on Accreditation for Health Informatics and
More informationTeaching (Instructional) Faculty Credentials Certification Policy. Policy Title: Teaching (Instructional) Faculty Credentials Certification Policy
Teaching (Instructional) Faculty Credentials Certification Policy Policy Title: Teaching (Instructional) Faculty Credentials Certification Policy Policy Type: Administrative Policy Number: Policy 30-11
More informationProgram Statement for Masters in Patent Practice. This memorandum describes the program for a Masters in Patent Practice at the Case
Case Western Reserve University 3 October 2014 Program Statement for Masters in Patent Practice This memorandum describes the program for a Masters in Patent Practice at the Case Western Reserve University
More informationInstitutional Handbook of Operating Procedures (IHOP)
Institutional Handbook of Operating Procedures (IHOP) Section: Section 12 Academics Education and Student Related First Release Date: 01/23/2012 Policy Name: 12.7 Approval and Review of Degree Programs
More informationHow To Prepare For Graduate School
Graduate School Planning Ahead Overview Graduate school is a huge investment of your time and money. The key is to know what you want to get out of your education before you make the investment. To consider
More informationProgram Assessment Report 2005-2006 Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) Finance
I. Program Goals Program Assessment Report 2005-2006 Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) The program goals are relevant, student oriented, specific and include the following: 1. To graduate students
More informationFORMAL PROPOSAL FOR A NEW DEGREE PROGRAM and DISTANCE LEARNING DELIVERY (Program is New and Institution Currently Offers Distance Learning Programs)
FORMAL PROPOSAL FOR A NEW DEGREE PROGRAM and DISTANCE LEARNING DELIVERY (Program is New and Institution Currently Offers Distance Learning Programs) Institution: Approval by President or Vice President
More informationTexas State University 2012-2017 University Goals and Initiatives College of Applied Arts 2012-2013 Plan Progress
Texas State University 2012-2017 University Goals and Initiatives College of Applied Arts 2012-2013 Plan Progress Goal 1: Promote academic quality by building and supporting a distinguished faculty. 1.1
More informationGUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE PROVOST UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15260 JULY, 2002 Guidelines for Conducting Evaluations of Academic Programs
More informationItawamba Community College Program Review Career-Technical and Health Science Programs
Itawamba Community College Program Review Career-Technical and Health Science Programs I. Program Information 1. Name of Program Automotive Technology 2. Submission Date of Program Review 5/9/2011 (ex.
More informationReview of the B.A., B.S. in Psychology 42.0101
Review of the B.A., B.S. in Psychology 42.0101 Overview of the program. The B.A., B.S. in Psychology program is housed in the Department of Psychology within the College of Arts and Sciences. Other programs
More informationACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW GUIDELINES
Kean University ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW GUIDELINES Overview Program review is an ongoing process involving the faculty and others concerned with the particular academic program. The guidelines established
More informationPROPOSAL FOR NEW INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND Change in Five Year Integrated Program
Copied from http://www.provost.umd.edu/pcc_documents/pcc_proposal.htm PROPOSAL FOR NEW INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND Change in Five Year Integrated Program I. OVERVIEW
More informationNLNAC STANDARDS AND CRITERIA BACCALAUREATE DEGREE PROGRAMS
NLNAC STANDARDS AND CRITERIA BACCALAUREATE DEGREE PROGRAMS I. Mission and Governance There are clear and publicly stated mission and/or philosophy and purposes appropriate to postsecondary or higher education
More informationReview of the B.S. in Computer Science 11.0701
Review of the B.S. in Computer Science 11.0701 Context and overview. The B.S. in Computer Science program is housed in the School of Information Technology within the College of Applied Science and Technology.
More informationAssessment Findings and Curricular Improvements Department of Psychology Master s and PhD Programs. Assessment Measures
Assessment Findings and Curricular Improvements Department of Psychology Master s and PhD Programs Assessment Measures The Department of Psychology uses the following measures to assess departmental learning
More informationHow to Choose a McMaster Certificate of Academic and Diploma
Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Complete Policy Title: Certificates and Diplomas, Policy on Policy Number (if applicable): Approved by: Senate Date of Original Approval(s): May 12, 1997 Responsible
More informationGrambling State University FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN. FY 2017-2018 through FY 2021-2022
Grambling State University FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2017-2018 through FY 2021-2022 July 1, 2016 GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY Strategic Plan FY 2017-2018 through FY 2021-2022 Vision Statement: To be one
More informationGRADUATE FACULTY COMMITTEE DOC. NO. 951 Revised and Approved May 17, 2010 Revised and Approved February 19, 2007 Approved May 17, 2004
GRADUATE FACULTY COMMITTEE DOC. NO. 951 Revised and Approved May 17, 2010 PROCEDURES FOR QUALITATIVE REVIEWS OF GRADUATE PROGRAMS I. Mandate for Reviews At an interval not to exceed ten years, each department
More informationAcademic Program Review External Reviewers Report Template
Academic Program Review External Reviewers Report Template The report prepared by the External Reviewers will be used by the Arkansas Department of Higher Education (ADHE) to verify the student demand
More informationEducational Master Plan 2010-2015 Goals WORKING DRAFT
Educational Master Plan 2010-2015 Goals WORKING DRAFT 1. PROVIDE SUPPORT TO ENSURE STUDENT RECRUITMENT, RETENTION AND SUCCESS. 1.1. Develop a policy to optimize student opportunity and access linked to
More informationHow To Manage Nursing Education
NLNAC STANDARDS AND CRITERIA ASSOCIATE DEGREE PROGRAMS I. Mission and Governance There are clear and publicly stated mission and/or philosophy and purposes appropriate to postsecondary or higher education
More informationOutcomes Assessment for School and Program Effectiveness: Linking Planning and Evaluation to Mission, Goals and Objectives
Outcomes Assessment for School and Program Effectiveness: Linking Planning and Evaluation to Mission, Goals and Objectives The Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) views the planning and evaluation
More information