Tall Building Design Guidelines Status Update
|
|
|
- Dwain Wilkerson
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Tall Building Design Guidelines Status Update Date: April 6, 2010 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Planning and Growth Management Committee Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division All pg10016 SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the status of a consultant document titled Design Criteria for Review of Tall Building Proposals. This document, more generally referred to at the Tall Building Design Guidelines, was adopted by City Council in 2006 for a test period of one year. City Council subsequently extended this period by an additional two years, to January 2010, in order to allow for a greater period of testing through the review of tall building development proposals. During this test period, the Guidelines have been used by stakeholders including staff, the development industry, and the urban design/architectural community. Consultation with these stakeholders has shown that the document has been well received by staff and by the urban design/architectural community. These stakeholders have also indicated that the document would benefit from some improvements and revisions. The development industry has expressed some concerns with the document, including that some of the criteria are too general to be applied across the entire city. Despite these concerns, some of the Tall Building Design Guideline criteria have proven to work well throughout the duration of test period and have gained acceptance amongst stakeholders, including the development industry. These criteria, which include minimum and maximum base building heights, a floor plate size limitation, and minimum tower-to-tower separation distances, lend themselves for inclusion in the City s new zoning by-law. A report on the new Zoning by-law, also before the Committee, discusses these proposed requirements and in which areas of the City they will apply. This report recommends that the Guidelines continue to be used in the evaluation of tall building development proposals. Notwithstanding this, some changes to the Guideline document are required in order to respond to concerns raised and suggestions for Staff report for action Tall Building Design Guidelines Status Update 1
2 improvement. The report also recommends, therefore, that the finalized document be presented to Planning and Growth Management Committee in the Spring of 2011 for endorsement as an official City urban design guideline. It will subsequently be incorporated into an updated version of the City s Urban Design Handbook. RECOMMENDATIONS The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council endorse the continued use of the Tall Building Design Guidelines in the evaluation of tall building development proposals throughout the City; and 2. City Planning staff revise the document to respond to issues identified throughout the test period, stylistically format it into the official City of Toronto urban design guideline template, and present it to Planning and Growth Management Committee in the Spring of 2011 Financial Impact The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. DECISION HISTORY At its meeting of March 3, 2003, City Council approved funding to undertake a consultant study to develop design criteria to assist staff with the review of tall building proposals. City Council adopted the resulting report and consultant study, titled Design Criteria for the Review of Tall Building Proposals at its meeting of July 25-27, 2006 ( In adopting this report, Council authorized implementation of the Tall Building Design Guidelines for a test period of 1 year. City Council subsequently extended this test period by an additional two years, to January 2010, in order to allow for a greater period of testing through the review of tall building development proposals ( Other related recommendations from City Council (July 25-27, 2006) directed several modifications to the Tall Building Design Guidelines. One of these, incorporating the Appendix on Sustainable Design into the main body of the report, has already been implemented. Another modification, to expand upon text relating to the City s Percent for Public Art Program, is being addressed within the draft Percent for Public Art Program Guidelines (adopted by City Council in June 2006). Further requests included examination of the need to develop additional design criteria related to the achievement of enhanced pedestrian connections to local transit services, and of the attainment of the City s waste reduction/recycling targets. Assessment of the suitability of these issues will be addressed within the report containing the updated version of the Tall Building Design Guidelines. Staff report for action Tall Building Design Guidelines Status Update 2
3 ISSUE BACKGROUND Section of the Official Plan includes general built form principles for the design of tall buildings. The Tall Building Design Guidelines are intended to elaborate upon and assist with the implementation of these general principles by providing more detailed guidelines which are linked to a common set of measurable criteria (e.g. floor plate size, tower separation distances) and qualitative indicators (e.g. design quality). In addition to the Official Plan, the Guidelines are linked to other City initiatives which also deal with tall building development: Tall Buildings, Inviting Change in Downtown Toronto A consultant s study titled Tall Buildings, Inviting Change in Downtown Toronto has recently been completed. This study develops locational and height criteria for tall buildings and rules for their development in Downtown Toronto. The findings, recommendations and rules that result from this Study build on criteria within the Tall Building Design Guidelines. This Study will be sent as a communication item to Toronto and East York Community Council for its meeting on May 25, City s Harmonized Zoning By-law Some of the Tall Building Design Guideline criteria lend themselves for inclusion in the City s new zoning by-law. The criteria being included in the proposed zoning by-law are those measures which are important in all tall building proposals, and which have worked well throughout the test period of the Guidelines. They include criteria related to minimum and maximum base building height, floor plate size limitation, and tower-totower separation distances. The draft zoning by-law containing these criteria was introduced for public consultation in May An updated version of the new Zoning By-law, to be released on April 21, 2010, contains revisions to the section concerning tall building requirements. Further discussion on the relationship between the Tall Building Design Guidelines and the new Zoning By-law is included in the Comments section of this report. COMMENTS In the period beginning July 2006 and ending in January 2010, the City received approximately 141 site-specific development proposals which could be described as being tall buildings (proposals greater than 12 stories). These proposals were received in all planning districts of the City, and many of them - particularly those outside of the South District - included more than one tall building proposal as part of the single application. The Tall Building Design Guidelines were used by stakeholders to assist both with the design and evaluation of these proposals. The Guidelines were also used to assist in formation of new planning and urban design studies (including the Humber Bay Shores Urban Design Guidelines, the Tall Buildings, Inviting Change in Downtown Toronto study, York University Secondary Plan, the emerging Lawrence Allan Redevelopment, and Downsview Secondary Plan among others). They were also used by the Design Review Panel in their related work. Staff are satisfied that the Guidelines have been sufficiently applied and examined over the course of the three year test period to allow for their full evaluation. To assist with Staff report for action Tall Building Design Guidelines Status Update 3
4 this evaluation, stakeholders were engaged throughout the test period via formal meetings and informal mail-outs. A summary of stakeholder comments relating to the document is as follows: Comments from the Development Industry The development industry was supportive of the intent of the Tall Building Design Guidelines, but raised some concerns with them. One concern was that the guiding criteria are too general to account for City-wide complexities relating to development nuances such as scale, lot size, and appropriate transition criteria. The suggestion was made by some within this industry that, with this complexity, tall building proposals should be evaluated on a site-by-site basis rather than through City-wide criteria. In response to this concern, staff note that it was anticipated that detailed urban design guidelines would be formulated to elaborate upon the intent and method of implementation when the Official Plan policies for tall building development were approved. With this direct relationship to the Official Plan, the Tall Building Design Guidelines necessarily have City-wide applicability. Concerns relating to the Guidelines being too general can be addressed through more detailed site specific studies, District studies, or area-focussed studies (such as the one recently completed for Downtown Toronto) as required. Other concerns of the development industry related to the proposed minimum spacing distances between tall buildings, and side and rear set-back requirements. The response to this concern is discussed further below. Comments from the Urban Design / Architectural Community Feedback from this stakeholder group was positive, with one member of the Design Review Panel describing the Guidelines as an essential document. Various suggestions for improvements to the Guidelines were provided, including stylistic improvements to the diagrams and photographs, reduction in the quantity of explanatory text, and the inclusion of a checklist within the document which would enable users to indicate how they complied with requirements on a point by point fashion. Comments from City Planning Staff City Planning staff have found the Guidelines to be very helpful in the assessment of site specific tall building proposals as well as in the preparation of area specific planning and urban design studies. Staff have also indicated that some aspects of the Guidelines could be refined and strengthened. Suggestions included the provision of more direction about the proportion of base building to shaft height, the relationship between base building height and contextual fit, the impact of balcony design upon building articulation, shadow and sky view, and recognition of the differing levels of development intensity in the City. Tall Building Criteria and the new Zoning By-law As noted previously, some of the Tall Building Design Guideline criteria lend themselves for inclusion in the City s new zoning by-law. The criteria which are proposed for inclusion within the zoning by-law are those which are important in all tall building Staff report for action Tall Building Design Guidelines Status Update 4
5 proposals, and which have worked well throughout the test period of the Guidelines. They are also the ones which have gained acceptance amongst stakeholders, as determined during the consultation process initiated through evaluation of the Tall Building Design Guidelines and the draft new zoning by-law. These criteria are as follows: Minimum Height of Base Building A Base Building is defined as the portion of a building which rises below the height equivalent of the adjacent road allowance. Minimum heights for base buildings respect Official Plan policies asking for buildings to define and support a high quality public realm, as they can have the effect of generating more life and pedestrian culture on major streets. They also have the effect of allowing bigger buildings to fit into a context of lower scaled buildings. Minimum building heights also support Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) objectives of building strong communities and undertaking the wise use and management of resources. In recognition of these benefits, various city policy initiatives including the Tall Building Design Guidelines, Tall Buildings, Inviting Change in Downtown Toronto Study, and the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study include criteria requiring the minimum height of base buildings to be 3 storeys. This provision will be included within new zoning by-law. Maximum Height of Base Building Official Plan policy (1a) states that the base building will provide definition and support at an appropriate scale for adjacent streets, parks and open spaces, integrate with adjacent buildings, minimize the impact of parking and servicing uses. In order for the Base Building to achieve this supporting role, the Guidelines include criteria which limits its height to being within a 45 degree angular plane, as measured from the curb on the opposite side of the street. This upper limit to the base building height helps ensure the base building is responsive to localized street proportions or its contextual height, and results in better sunlight and skyview on the street edge. As this criteria relates directly to the Official Plan policy described above, it is also proposed for inclusion within the new zoning by-law. However, for the purpose of the zoning by-law, this criteria has been translated into a format which is more readily quantifiable but of equivalent geometry, being 0.8 multiplied by the Right-of-Way width. If the property is on a corner site, the height would be calculated on the basis of the widest street in order to give the building a degree of prominence. Tower Separation The provision of natural light and privacy are key built form objectives within the Official Plan (section 3.1.2, policy 3 and 4). Quality of life issues in tall buildings are dependent on separation distances which protect access to light, sky view, and privacy; reducing the spacing distances by moving tall building closer together compromises liveability issues within units as well as the quality of the public realm. To achieve this, the Guidelines ask for a minimum separation distance of 25 metres between tall buildings on a lot. In compact urban areas, the Guidelines suggest that this distance will be secured through a minimum 12.5 metre setback of the shaft from the side or rear property line. Staff report for action Tall Building Design Guidelines Status Update 5
6 Staff are of the opinion that this spacing criteria is very important to achieve a good quality of life for inhabitants of tall buildings and to create acceptable skyview and shadow impacts to adjacent public streets. Subsequently, the minimum 25 metre separation distance between towers on one lot is being proposed as a new regulation within the harmonized zoning by-law. However, further to concerns on this issue raised by the development industry, staff do appreciate that achieving the exact separating distance required within the Guidelines can be difficult at times, particularly on the compact urban sites which are common to The Downtown. The minimum 12.5 metre side and rear setback criteria, therefore, will remain within the Guidelines but are not being introduced as a new regulation within the harmonized zoning by-law at this time. Floor Plate Size Limitation The guidelines encourage small floor plates for tall buildings rather than wider slab-form buildings as they are better able to meet Official Plan objectives relating to shadowing, access to natural light, privacy and sky view. Slender buildings also promote sustainability by providing opportunity for increased daylight catchment and more efficient climate control within the building. In order to achieve these benefits, the Guidelines include criteria which indicates that floor plates for residential development should be approximately 750 m2 (1860m2 for commercial buildings). Tall Building proposals across the City have generally been able to comply with this criteria, and some proposals in the Downtown have been below this requirement (some examples include 426 University Avenue, 599m2; 31 Balmuto Street, 397m2; and 1000 Bay Street, 377m2). Subsequently, the floor plate size limitation criteria is proposed for inclusion within the new zoning by-law. This provision will limit the floor plate size of the Tower (above the Base Building) to 750 square metres and will apply to any building containing residential units. It will not apply to commercial office buildings, hotel buildings, or hotels which have a residential component. CONCLUSION The Tall Building Design Guidelines have been rigorously tested against tall building development proposals throughout the City over a three-year test period. During this time they have gained acceptance amongst stakeholders, and become a vital instrument for Planning staff conducting the assessment of tall building proposals in all areas of the City. The Guidelines have been found to be responsive to localized nuances, and represent a made in Toronto approach to the review of tall building proposals. Some of the Tall Building Design Guideline criteria lend themselves for inclusion in the City s new zoning by-law. The criteria which are proposed for inclusion within the proposed zoning by-law are those which are important in all tall building proposals, and which have worked well throughout the test period of the Guidelines. They are also ones which have gained acceptance amongst stakeholders, including the development industry. They include criteria related to minimum and maximum base building height, floor plate size limitation, and tower-to-tower separation distances. Staff report for action Tall Building Design Guidelines Status Update 6
7 The City Planning Division recommends that the Tall Building Design Guidelines continue to be used in the evaluation of tall building development proposals throughout the City. Staff also recommend that the document be revised to respond to issues identified throughout the test period, and stylistically formatted into the official City of Toronto urban design guidelines template. Staff will continue to consult with and respond to industry feedback during this time. The finalized document will be presented to Planning and Growth Management Committee in the Spring of 2011, and subsequently incorporated into an updated version of the City s Urban Design Handbook. CONTACT Robert Freedman Tel. No Fax No [email protected] SIGNATURE Gary Wright, Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning Division Staff report for action Tall Building Design Guidelines Status Update 7
Proposed Planning Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments Draft Zoning By-law Amendments
PG12.5 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Proposed Planning Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments Draft Zoning By-law Amendments Date: April 18, 2016 To: From: Wards:
2229-2245 Kingston Rd Removal of a Holding Provision (H) Application Final Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 2229-2245 Kingston Rd Removal of a Holding Provision (H) Application Final Report Date: May 29, 2015 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Scarborough Community Council Director,
3655 Kingston Rd - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 3655 Kingston Rd - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report Date: January 13, 2016 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Scarborough Community
68 & 70 Charles Street East & 628, 634, 636 & 638 Church Street- Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 68 & 70 Charles Street East & 628, 634, 636 & 638 Church Street- Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: November 21, 2014 To: From: Wards: Reference Number:
Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. 15-236743 STE 14 OZ and 15-130397 STE 14 RH
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 56-58 Atlantic Avenue and 25-35 Liberty Street and 57-65 Jefferson Avenue Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report Date: December 11,
Supplementary Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Supplementary Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan Date: May 30, 2013 To: From: Etobicoke York Community Council Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
STAFF REPORT. December 20, 2004. North District Community Council. Director of Community Planning - North
STAFF REPORT December 20, 2004 To: From: Subject: North District Community Council Director of Community Planning - North Preliminary Report Respecting Revised Application OPA & Rezoning Application 01
Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District 14 227468 STE 27 OZ & 14 227473 STE 27 RH
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 68 & 70 Charles Street East & 628, 634, 636 & 638 Church Street- Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 Final Report Date:
50 Bloor Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 50 Bloor Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: August 10, 2012 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Director,
DECISION/DIRECTION NOTE
DECISION/DIRECTION NOTE Title: Proposed rezoning new residential zone PDE file MPA1500006 150 Stavanger Drive Date Prepared: April 12, 2016 Report To: Chair and Members, Planning and Development Committee
Downtown Core Sub-district
3-10 Land Use Downtown Core Sub-district District development will be most intense and most urban in character in the Downtown Core. The objective is to establish this area as a citywide and regional retail
2.50 Retirement villages - section 32 evaluation for the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan
2.50 Retirement villages - section 32 evaluation for the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan 1 OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE...2 1.1 Subject Matter of this Section...2 1.2 Resource Management Issue to be Addressed...2
2175 Keele Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 2175 Keele Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report Date: December 15, 2015 To: From: Wards: Reference
ASSESSMENT OF LANDCAPE PROVISIONS FOR PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 1. Inner Business Zone. Outer Business Zone PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL
A division of Hudson Group Ltd ASSESSMENT OF LANDCAPE PROVISIONS FOR PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 1 Inner Business Zone Outer Business Zone PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL 1 2 A division of Hudson Group Ltd Prepared
CITY CLERK. Other Items Considered by the Community Council
CITY CLERK Consolidated Clause in Report 4, which was received, for information, by City Council on May 23, 24 and 25, 2006. 23 Other Items Considered by the Community Council (The Community Council is
DRAFT Policy to Guide Discretion on Proposed Relaxations to Minimum Parking Requirements in Commercial Districts City-Wide 2014 June 05
PARKING INITIATIVES Attachment I Corridor Program Descriptions Corridor Program Pilot Though the Corridor Program will officially launch in the fall, this summer, The City will pilot the first phase of
Zoning Status of Casinos in Toronto and East York District
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Zoning Status of Casinos in Toronto and East York District Date: September 5, 2012 To: From: Toronto and East York Community Council Chief Planner and Executive Director, City
23 Glen Watford Drive - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 23 Glen Watford Drive - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: August 21, 2013 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Scarborough Community Council Director, Community
Revere Beach Transit-Oriented Development Parcels Revere, Massachusetts. Design and Development Guidelines. Part Two.
Revere Beach Transit-Oriented Development Parcels Revere, Massachusetts Design and Development Guidelines Request for Qualifications and Expressions of Interest with Preliminary Development Plans Part
City Planning Heritage Preservation
1. Planning and Heritage This theme is examining the current built form, policy framework and zoning in the Study Area to help inform the larger Revitalization Initiative. Staff will bring forward recommendations
Lawrence Heights Revitalization Corporate Implementation Actions and Social Development Plan
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Lawrence Heights Revitalization Corporate Implementation Actions and Social Development Plan Date: June 8, 2010 To: From: Wards: Community Development and Recreation Committee
3. Shading. V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A.3 Aesthetics Shading
3. Shading The effects of shading by one building upon another can be either positive or negative depending upon the site-specific circumstances of the properties involved. A potential benefit of shading
28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)
28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District) Goals and Objectives To provide a guide for infill and new development in the Neighbourhood District. To outline the nature, form and character
Planning for the future. building a great city, great neighbourhoods
Planning for the future building a great city, great neighbourhoods Table of contents 1 Looking ahead 2.4 million Calgarians 2 Goals 3 Building a sustainable, connected city of great neighbourhoods 4 Finding
Conceptual Design and Analysis in Autodesk Revit Architecture 2011
AUTODESK REVIT ARCHITECTURE 2011 Conceptual Design and Analysis in Autodesk Revit Architecture 2011 In this white paper, CASE Design, a design technology consultancy based in New York City, describes how
Rapid City Downtown Area Master Plan. Draft Plan Concepts April 2016
Rapid City Downtown Area Master Plan Draft Plan Concepts April 2016 CALL TO ACTION! A Thriving Downtown = Regional Economic Prosperity Rapid City is competing nationally for a limited supply of young skilled
Presentation: Proposed Plan Amendments
Epstein s Rehabilitation Plan Presentation: Proposed Plan Amendments MORRISTOWN REDEVELOPMENT ENTITY March 14, 2013 Epstein s Rehabilitation Plan Presentation Part 1: Morristown Planning Division Neighborhood
5. Specific Use Regulations
5. Specific Use Regulations 5.1 Application 5.1.1 The specific use regulations shall apply to all development unless otherwise exempted in this section. 5.1.2 Where these regulations may be in conflict
CONSENT, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 34A, 88, 104, 104C, and 108 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT, IS GRANTED. THE FULL DECISION IS SET OUT BELOW
A U C K L A N D C O U N C I L Decision following the hearing of an application for resource consent SUBJECT: Application for resource consent under section 88 of the Resource Management Act 1991 by D C
23.1 RENEWABLE ENERGY
Proposed Hastings District Plan as Amended 23.1 Renewable Energy 23.1 RENEWABLE ENERGY 23.1.1 INTRODUCTION The use of energy is of fundamental importance to the function and development of our society.
PROPOSED PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT FOR FORMER CARLTON AND UNITED BREWERIES SITE, CARLTON
Page 1 of 57 PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT Agenda Item 5.4 PROPOSED PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT FOR FORMER CARLTON AND UNITED BREWERIES SITE, CARLTON 4 September 2007 Division Sustainability and Regulatory Services
Solar Planning and Zoning Implementation Guide
U.S. Department of Energy SunShot Rooftop Solar Challenge I City University of New York On Behalf of New York City Solar Planning and Zoning Implementation Guide Compliance with NYC Green Zone Text for
BULLETIN NO. 6. Car-Share Requirements and Guidelines for Car-Share Spaces ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. 1. Car-share Basics PURPOSE: OVERVIEW:
Car-Share Requirements and Guidelines for Car-Share Spaces Section 307 of the City Planning Code mandates the Zoning Administrator to issue and adopt such rules, regulations and interpretations as are
Amendment C195 to the Boroondara Planning Scheme - Maling Road Built Form Guidelines - Summary of Submissions and Request for Panel
UPC2 Amendment C195 to the Boroondara Planning Scheme - Maling Road Built Form Guidelines - Summary of Submissions and Request for Panel Abstract On 17 March 2014 the Urban Planning Special Committee (UPSC)
Cellular Antenna Proposal Form
Cellular Antenna Proposal Form Islands Trust, Northern Office 700 North Road, Gabriola Island, BC V0R 1X3 Phone: 250-247-2063 Fax: 250-247-7514 www.islandstrust.bc.ca [email protected] Be sure
I-90 ALLSTON INTERCHANGE PLACEMAKING STUDY Boston Redevelopment Authority
I-90 ALLSTON INTERCHANGE PLACEMAKING STUDY Boston Redevelopment Authority The Cecil Group Stantec Nelson/Nygaard Task Force Presentation December 17, 2015 I-90 Allston Interchange Placemaking Study Agenda
Manchester City Council Planning and Highways Committee 2 June 2011
Application Number 095804/FO/2011/N1 Date of Appln 21st Mar 2011 Committee Date 2nd Jun 2011 Ward Cheetham Ward Proposal Location Applicant Agent Installation of 929 square metre mezzanine floor area to
Development Variance Permit Application Package
When do I need a Development Variance Permit? Development Variance Permit Application Package If my proposed development does not meet the standards set out in the Zoning Regulation Bylaw on matters that
Request for Proposal
Request for Proposal Business Plan for the Development of the North Bay Community Waterfront Park 1. Introduction: This Request for Proposal ( RFP ) seeks to establish a firm or consortium of firms ( Consultant
Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD
Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD Boundaries The Near West Side Comprehensive Plan covers a broad area immediately west of Milwaukee s downtown.
Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014
Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment April 22-23, 2014 Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment Through the Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment Tool developed by Global future development
Section 13 Urban Residential Zones
Section 13 Urban Residential Zones 13.1 RU1 Large Lot Housing RU1c Large Lot Housing with Carriage House RU1h Large Lot Housing (Hillside Area) RU1hc Large Lot Housing (Hillside Area) with Carriage House
Financial Analysis for the Ambleside Centre Zoning Districts
Financial Analysis for the Ambleside Centre Zoning Districts July 2013 Prepared for: The District of West Vancouver By: Coriolis Consulting Corp. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Purpose...
Introduction. Two storey & first floor rear extensions. two storey rear 1
Introduction This advice leaflet has been produced to help in the planning of your house extension, by identifying the main points to consider, in order to achieve an acceptable proposal. This leaflet
RESIDENTIAL WOOD DECKS
RESIDENTIAL WOOD DECKS 1 A Building Permit is required for the construction of a wood deck where the deck is more than 600 mm above grade at any point. Definition: For the purposes of this pamphlet, a
INFRASTRUCTURE, FLOOD PROTECTION AND REMEDIATION. Infrastructure Flood Protection Remediation Policies
INFRASTRUCTURE, FLOOD PROTECTION AND REMEDIATION Infrastructure Flood Protection Remediation Policies DRAFT POOLBEG PLANNING SCHEME 196 FIGURE 9.1: UTILITIES WAYLEAVES Electricity Cables 8m Wayleave for
Technical Advice Note: Retail Impact Assessments
Technical Advice Note: Retail Impact Assessments 1 A GUIDE FOR RETAIL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS INTRODUCTION This Technical Advice Note (TAN) has been prepared to assist applicants seeking planning permission
The Homeowner s Building Application Checklist for Constructing a Residential Sundeck
This checklist provides homeowners a summary of the Building Permit submission requirements for constructing a residential sundeck. Regardless of the deck s walking surface area, if the deck is adjacent
Welcome to our exhibition
Welcome to our exhibition Welcome to this public exhibition for Cherry Park, Westfield, Stratford. This exhibition has been organised to update residents on Cherry Park, the next phase of development in
Parkway Forest Context Plan
Parkway Forest Context Plan City of Toronto June 11, 2007 Final WZMH Architects Table of Contents: 1.0 Introduction and Background 1.1 Location 1.2 Context Plan Area 1.3 Surrounding Features 1.4 Existing
OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK REPORT
OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ABOUT THE WORKSHOP Page 3 2. GREEN SPACE/OPEN SPACE AS A COMMUNITY CONNECTOR Page 5 3. SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY DESIGN
Electric system improvements near you South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development
Electric system improvements near you South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development SAUNDERS LAKE SUBSTATION AND TRANSMISSION LINES January 2014 Volume 2 PLEASE NOTE: We want to inform you that
Instructions 1. trigger visit www.atkinsglobal.com/voyago
Skylines 1 (singular. a trip, a voyage, to travel) Download our app and explore augmented reality to find out how our talented designers, engineers and project managers in the Middle East are helping to
07 Appendix A - Part 01 Shadow Studies Report
07 Appendix A - Part 01 Shadow Studies Report Australia Square August 31 12-2 (10 minute intervals) Public Space tower envelope 15m indicative roof feature zone Proposed tower envelope 1.00-1.20 1.30-1.50
A Guide to Pre-Application Advice and Fees and Planning Performance Agreements
A Guide to Pre-Application Advice and Fees and Planning Performance Agreements V3 Sept 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 2. The Benefits of Pre-Application Advice 3. How do I obtain pre-application advice?
October 15, 2013. Mayor and Council City of New Westminster 511 Royal Avenue New Westminster, BC V3L 1H9
October 15, 2013 Mayor and Council City of New Westminster 511 Royal Avenue New Westminster, BC V3L 1H9 RE: Business Plan Advancing a Collaborative, Regional Approach to Flood Management in BC s Lower
City of Los Angeles. Presentation on Sidewalk Vending. June 18, 2015
City of Los Angeles Presentation on Sidewalk Vending 1 June 18, 2015 Background Motion (Price-Huizar-Buscaino) Economic Development Committee Meeting (May 13, 2014) First Status Report: Initial Community
21 Plumbers Row, London, E1 1EQ
Committee: Development Date: 19 th October 2011 Classification: Unrestricted Agenda Item No: Report of: Corporate Director of Development and Renewal Case Officer: Shahara Ali-Hempstead Title: Planning
Canadian Electrical Code, Part I Full Impact Assessment
Copyright CSA Group 2015 Canadian Electrical Code, Part I Full Impact Assessment Subject 3840 Section 8 Revisions to load calculations CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE FULL IMPACT ASSESSMENT... 3 2 PURPOSE
Site Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners
Site Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners Action the COI Table Of Contents Introduction... 3 Benefit of carrying out a site assessment... 4 How to carry out a site assessment
BUILDING A FENCE? THE CITY OF CAMBRIDGE REQUIRES THAT ALL FENCES WITHIN THE CITY CONFORM TO THE REGULATIONS OF FENCE BY-LAW
BUILDING A FENCE? THE CITY OF CAMBRIDGE REQUIRES THAT ALL FENCES WITHIN THE CITY CONFORM TO THE REGULATIONS OF FENCE BY-LAW FENCING FOR SWIMMING POOLS/HOT TUBS SPECIAL INFORMATION Your attention is drawn
Design and Access Statement. 141-145 Earls Court Road London SW5 9RH
J U L I A N A R E N D T A S S O C I A T E S 1 7 a P i n d o c k M e w s L i t t l e V e n i c e L o n d o n W 9 2 P Y F + 4 4 2 0 7 2 8 6 9 9 0 1 Design and Access Statement T + 4 4 2 0 7 2 8 6 9 9 9 1
General Advice. 2 rear single storey
Introduction This advice leaflet has been produced to help in the planning of your house extension, by identifying the main points to consider, in order to achieve an acceptable proposal. This leaflet
Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals
The Institute for Education Leadership (IEL) brings together representatives from the principals' associations, the supervisory officers' associations, councils of directors of education and the Ministry
Executive 29 October 2015
Executive 29 October 2015 Report of the Assistant Director - Finance, Property & Procurement Portfolio of the Executive Member for Finance and Performance The Future of York s Guildhall & Riverside Summary
Rufus 2.0 - Block 19. Project #3015022 DRB Recommendation Meeting #1 May 21, 2013
Rufus 2.0-1 Table of Contents 1 Purpose of Recommendation Meeting #1... 2 2... 3 Masterplan Aerial View 3 Open Space Aerial View 4-5 Three-Block Site Plan 6 Concepts 7 Design Guideline Priorities 8 Model
City Manager, Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, Interim Chief General Manager, Toronto Transit Commission
Spadina Subway Extension- Update STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Date: April 16, 2007 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Executive Committee City Manager, Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer,
We have consulted with internal and external. King Square Estate Newsletter. Regeneration Proposals
www.islington.gov.uk/housing Regeneration Proposals NOVEMBER 2014 Welcome to the third edition of the King Square newsletter, with the latest update on the King Square Estate regeneration project. This
TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC 27511-6437. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC 27511-6437
TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT PETITION: PETITIONER(S): OWNER(S): LOCATION: 01-REZ-16 204 N. Dixon Avenue, Cary, NC PARCEL IDENTIFICATION: 076418218784 REALID: 0031004 AREA: APPROVED ZONING:
Shaping Whanganui. Have your say, korero mai
Shaping Whanganui Have your say, korero mai Outer Commercial Design Guidelines Discussion Document Background The Outer Commercial zone of the District Plan sits on the outside of the central shopping
City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: 7908-0284-00
City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT PROPOSAL: Planning Report Date: March 30, 2009 Development Permit in order to permit the development of a new concrete bagging and storage facility on the site
General Advice. 2 front extensions
Introduction This advice leaflet has been produced to help in the planning of your house extension, by identifying the main points to consider, in order to achieve an acceptable proposal. This leaflet
Gold Property Developments welcomes you to this exhibition of the draft plans for the regeneration of the Holborn Studios site on Eagle Wharf Road.
WELCOME Gold Property Developments welcomes you to this exhibition of the draft plans for the regeneration of the Holborn Studios site on Eagle Wharf Road. The site covers approximately 0.37 hectares and
STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND NOTES IN SUPPORT OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
CITY COUNCIL PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE AT LOT XX, DP:55555 XXX Anon Drive, Somewhere FOR X. & Y Anonymous STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND NOTES IN SUPPORT OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Angela Elliss Design
Tall Buildings in the City of London
Tall Buildings in the City of London Published by the City of London Corporation, Department of the Built Environment, February 2015 Part 2 of 3: Sections 3 & 4 The report is divided into 3 parts, all
Planning should achieve high quality urban design and architecture that: Contributes positively to local urban character and sense of place.
15 BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND HERITAGE 15/07/2013 VC100 Planning should ensure all new land use and development appropriately responds to its landscape, valued built form and cultural context, and protect places
Churches and Schools Development Standards
Uses Code Provisions Site Development Standards RS-4 Sec.24-44 RD Sec. 24-45 RM-23 Sec. 24-48 Residential Single Family Residential Two- Family (Duplex) Residential Mid- Rise Multifamily (High Density)
Friends Seminary Presentation to NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission 21 April 2015 Kliment Halsband Architects
Presentation to NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission 21 April 2015 Kliment Halsband Architects FRIENDS SEMINARY RE-DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NYC LPC SUBMISSION 16 APRIL 2015 INDEX 1 Project Description 2 Stuyvesant
Circular No : URA/PB/2004/29-CUDD Fax: 6220 3201 Our Ref : DC/ADMIN/CIRCULAR/PB_04 Date : 6 Sep 2004
Circular No : URA/PB/2004/29-CUDD Fax: 6220 3201 Our Ref : DC/ADMIN/CIRCULAR/PB_04 Date : 6 Sep 2004 CIRCULAR TO PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTES GUIDELINES TO ENCOURAGE MORE INNOVATIVE AND BETTER DESIGN OF ROOFTOPS.
WELLINGTON STREET WEST COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN
112 4.IMPLEMENTATION 113 4.1 Overview The Wellington Street West CDP, once approved by City Council, will be Council s policy for the planning area and is intended to guide City staff, the community and
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS. On-Call Conceptual Architectural and Engineering Design Services
Hemisfair Park Area Redevelopment Corporation June 26, 2015 Rendering of the Hemisfair Civic Park Schematic Design REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS On-Call Conceptual Architectural and Engineering Design Services
TRU Math Conversation Guide
Release Version Alpha TRU Math Conversation Guide Module A: Contextual Algebraic Tasks This TRU Math Conversation Guide, Module A: Contextual Algebraic Tasks is a product of The Algebra Teaching Study
Services Department A009/08 April 28, 2008
Report To: Development Services Committee Item: Date of Report: From: DS-08-150 April 23, 2008 Commissioner, Development File: Date of Meeting: Services Department A009/08 April 28, 2008 Subject: Direction
DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST Chapter 6 Special Consideration Design Guidelines
DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST Chapter 6 Special Consideration Design Guidelines A. Offices a. Office buildings should be built to the minimum required setback. b. Surface parking should be located towards the
Appendix 4 - Statutory Officers Protocol
Appendix 4 - Statutory Officers Protocol Accountability Protocol for role of Director of Children s Services within the London Borough of Barnet Introduction In September 2014, the Chief Executive of the
Affordability Analysis of 801 South Street Tower B. Revised: 21 November 2013. Ariel Salinas [email protected]
Affordability Analysis of 801 South Street Tower B Revised: 21 November 2013 Ariel Salinas [email protected] Introduction 801 South Street Tower B is supposed to offer affordably priced units that comply
R esidential intensification
R esidential intensification Case Studies Municipal Initiatives MARKETING CITY-OWNED PROPERTIES North Vancouver, British Columbia Summary City-owned lands in a former industrial area of the city are being
BEST PRACTICE NOTE LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT 10.1 NZILA. Members Documentation
BEST PRACTICE NOTE LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT 10.1 NZILA Members Documentation Background In August 2008, the New Zealand Institute of Landscape Architects (NZILA) Education Foundation
CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION AGENDA REPORT
CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 1 SUBJECT: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ALTERNATIVE FOR THE YEAR 2015-2025 GENERAL PLAN
Minor Accommodation Planning Review Application
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Tel. (310) 285 1141 Fax. (310) 858 5966 Planning Review Overview: Minor Accommodation Planning Review Application Before
Downtown South Salt Lake Redevelopment City of South Salt Lake
Project Information LOCAL PLANNING RESOURCE PROGRAM 2015 Downtown South Salt Lake Redevelopment City of South Salt Lake Overview of Objectives: Building a downtown city center could be the most significant
"Description of the urban and architectural development conceptual design of the historical city centre of Gorzow Wlkp. R3DC4T
"Description of the urban and architectural development conceptual design of the historical city centre of Gorzow Wlkp. R3DC4T Gorzów Wielkopolski Gorzów Wielkopolski is an important regional city centre
Welcome & background. www.theperfumefactory.info
Welcome & background Essential Living welcomes you to this community involvement event introducing the proposed redevelopment of The Perfume Factory, North Acton. EXISTING SITE PLAN AERIAL VIEW OF SITE
PLANNING POLICY 3.3.5
PLANNING POLICY 3.3.5 CHILD CARE PREMISES 1. Introduction A Child Care Premises is used to provide a child care service within the meaning of the Child Care Services Act 2007, but does not include a Family
6. Social & Community Facilities
6.1. Objectives The built environment, with appropriate housing, public spaces and community facilities provides a basic platform to ensure residents have the best opportunity to build their own community.
DEVLOPMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURES
DEVLOPMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURES Bylaw No. 2444 and amendments thereto CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY This is a consolidation of the bylaws listed below. The amending bylaws have been consolidated
