Comparison of Kinematic and Temporal Parameters Between Different Pitch Velocity Groups
|
|
- Alexis Wilkerson
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 17, by Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc. Comparison of Kinematic and Temporal Parameters Between Different Pitch Velocity Groups Tomoyuki Matsuo, Rafael F. Escamilla, Glenn S. Fleisig, Steven W. Barrentine, and James R. Andrews This study investigated differences in kinematic and temporal parameters between two velocity groups of baseball pitchers. Data were collected from 127 healthy college and professional baseball pitchers. Those who threw faster than 1 SD above the sample mean (>38.0 m/s) were assigned to the high velocity group (n = 29), and those who threw slower than 1 SD below the sample mean (<34.2 m/s) were assigned to the low velocity group (n = 23). Twelve kinematic parameters and 9 temporal parameters were measured and analyzed. The pattern of lead knee movement was also investigated. Maximum shoulder external rotation, forward trunk tilt at the instant of ball release, and lead knee extension angular velocity at the instant of ball release were significantly greater in the high velocity group. Maximum lead knee flexion angular velocity was significantly greater in the low velocity group. Seventy percent of the high velocity group showed knee extension during the approach to ball release, whereas the low velocity group showed a variety of knee movement patterns involving less knee extension and more knee flexion. The greater shoulder external rotation in the high velocity group produced an increased range of motion during the acceleration phase. Key Words: baseball, high velocity, low velocity, biomechanics Introduction To date, numerous studies on biomechanical aspects of baseball pitching have been reported (Barrentine, Matsuo, Escamilla, Fleisig, & Andrews, 1998; Dillman, Fleisig, & Andrews, 1993; Escamilla, Fleisig, Barrentine, Zheng, & Andrews, 1998; Feltner & Dapena, 1986; Feltner, 1989; Fleisig, Andrews, Dillman, & Escamilla, 1995; Fleisig, Escamilla, Andrews, Matsuo, Satterwhite, & Barrentine, 1996; Gowan, Jobe, Tibone, Petty, & Moynes, 1987; Jobe, Moynes, Tibone, & Perry, 1984; Sakurai, Ikegami, Okamamo, Yabe, & Toyoshima, 1993). These studies provide useful information con- T. Matsuo is with the Faculty of Health & Sports Sciences at Osaka University, 1-17 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan. R.F. Escamilla is with the Michael W. Krzyzewski Human Performance Laboratory in the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery at Duke University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3435, Durham, NC G.S. Fleisig, S.W. Barrentine, and J.R. Andrews are with the American Sports Medicine Institute, th Street South, Birmingham, AL
2 2 Matsuo et al. cerning how body segments move, such as the magnitudes of forces or torques that are generated during pitching. Gowan et al. (1987) investigated electromyographic differences between professional pitchers and amateur pitchers, and found significant differences in muscle activity between these two groups. The amateur pitchers used the rotator cuff muscles to a greater extent than the professional pitchers. These muscles primarily help position the humeral head within the glenoid fossa throughout the delivery of the pitch. Although these electromyographic data are useful, there was no description about differences in pitching kinematics. Several comparative investigations have been reported focusing on other throwing activities. For example, several javelin studies (Bartlett, Muller, Lindinger, Brunner, & Morriss, 1996; Mero, Komi, Korjus, Navarro, & Gregor, 1994; Whiting, Gregor, & Halushka, 1991) have found that better performers had a longer stride, less flexion of the lead knee during the final plant phase, greater approach velocity, and longer horizontal distance between the throwing side hip and the javelin center of mass. Joris, van Muyen, van Ingen Schenau, and Kemper (1985) compared good handball throwers to poor handball throwers, and found that good throwers could exert higher force and higher power just before ball release. In baseball, throwing with maximum ball velocity is a critical factor for a pitcher s success. However, in baseball pitching, there are no known studies that have focused on a kinematic comparison between different velocity groups. Thus, comparative investigations are needed to promote further understanding of the mechanics of baseball pitching. Several throwing studies have shown that sequential movements from proximal to distal segments led to successful performance in overarm throwing (Atwater, 1979; Joris et al., 1985; Mero et al., 1994; Putnam, 1993; Whiting et al., 1991). Nevertheless, a limited number of studies have focused on temporal differences between different performance groups. All those studies focused on javelin throwing (Mero et al., 1994; Morris & Bartlett, 1996; Whiting et al., 1991) and found no significant temporal differences between different performance groups. It seems necessary to investigate whether these temporal results from javelin throwing also occur in baseball pitching. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in kinematics and temporal parameters during baseball pitching between high and low velocity groups. It was hypothesized that kinematic parameters measured during the acceleration phase of the pitch (i.e., from maximum shoulder external rotation to the instant of ball release) will show significant differences with greater values for the high velocity group, and that temporal parameters will show significant differences between the two velocity groups. Identifying kinematic and temporal differences will help the pitcher and coach determine pitching mechanics that produce maximum ball velocity. Methods Data were collected from 127 healthy college and professional baseball pitchers tested at the American Sports Medicine Institute. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of pitch velocity and anthropometric measurements were determined for all 127 subjects (Table 1). Those subjects with a pitch velocity greater than 1 SD above the mean (>38.0 m/s) were assigned to the high velocity group, while those subjects with a pitch velocity greater than 1 SD below the mean (<34.2 m/s) were assigned to the low velocity group. Therefore, a total of 52 subjects were assigned to either the high velocity group (21 professional and 8 college) or the low velocity group (23 college). Comparisons of kinematic and temporal parameters were made between the high velocity group and the low velocity group.
3 Kinematic and Temporal Parameters 3 Table 1 Physical Characteristics and Ball Velocities High velocity Low velocity Total (n = 127) group (n = 29) group (n = 23) Variable M SD M SD M SD Body height (m)* Body mass (kg) Humerus length (m)* Radius length (m)* Ball velocity (m/s)* *Significant differences (p <.01) between high and low velocity groups. The testing procedures followed previously reported protocols (Fleisig et al., 1996; Escamilla et al., 1998). Each subject reported for testing on one of his regularly scheduled pitching days. After providing history information and informed consent, the subject changed into a pair of spandex shorts, and body weight, body height, humerus length, and radius length were measured. Reflective markers (3.81 cm diameter) were attached bilaterally at the lateral malleoli, lateral femoral epicondyles, greater trochanters, lateral superior tip of the acromions, and lateral humeral epicondyles. A reflective marker was also positioned on the ulnar styloid process of the non-pitching wrist, while a reflective band approximately 1 cm wide was placed around the pitching wrist. Once the markers were positioned on the body, the subject was given an unlimited amount of time for stretching, warm-up throwing, pitching off an ATEC (Athletic Training Equipment Company, Sparks, NV) indoor pitching mound, and any other type of preparation he desired. Subjects were instructed to prepare just as if they were going to pitch in a game. Each subject threw toward a strike zone ribbon located over home plate at a regulation distance of 18.4 m from the pitching rubber. Once a subject was ready to pitch as in a game environment, fastball data were collected. Ball velocity at the instant of ball release was measured by the Jugs radar gun (Jugs Pitching Machine Company, Tualatin, OR) from behind home plate. Each subject threw 5 8 fastball pitches, with approximately s rest between each pitch. The three trials with the highest ball velocities and thrown for strikes were analyzed and averaged for each subject. Kinematic and temporal differences among the three trials for each subject have been shown to be small and insignificant (Fleisig et al., 1996; Escamilla et al., 1998). A Motion Analysis (Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA) three-dimensional automatic digitizing system was used to quantify each pitcher s motion. Four electronically synchronized charged couple device cameras transmitted pixel images of the reflective markers directly into a video processor, with each camera operating at 200 Hz. Three-dimensional marker locations were calculated with Motion Analysis Expertvision 3-D software (Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA), utilizing the direct linear transformation method (Abdel-Aziz & Karara, 1971; Shapiro, 1978).
4 4 Matsuo et al. The camera coefficients were calibrated by recording the position of markers attached to four vertically-suspended wires. Three reflective markers, which were 0.61 m apart from each other, were attached to each wire. These wires were positioned so that the markers made a matrix approximately 1.5 m 1.2 m 1.2 m in size, and were suspended approximately 0.3 m above the ground. The 1.5 m dimension of the matrix was aligned with the direction of the pitch. This matrix was designed to encompass as much of the testing area as possible while having each marker visible in the field of view of all four cameras. The root mean-square error in the calculation of the three-dimensional marker location was found to be less than 1.0 cm. Kinematic parameters (Figures 1 and 2) and temporal parameters were calculated using the same methods previously described (Dillman et al., 1993; Fleisig et al., 1996; Escamilla et al., 1998). Lead foot contact was automatically determined as the time when the lead ankle velocity decreased to less than 1.5 m/s, while the instant of ball release was automatically quantified as the second video frame (0.01 s) after the wrist passed the elbow in the sagittal plane (i.e., the XgZg plane in Figure 2) direction (Fleisig, 1994; Escamilla et al., 1998). The position data were digitally filtered independently in the Xg Figure 1 Definition of upper arm angular parameters: (a) elbow flexion, (b) shoulder abduction, (c) shoulder horizontal adduction, and (d) shoulder external rotation.
5 Kinematic and Temporal Parameters 5 (from the center of the pitching rubber to the center of home plate; Figure 2a), Yg (the cross product of the Zg and Xg unit-vector), and Zg (pointing vertical) directions. A fourthorder zero-lag Butterworth digital low-pass filter was used with a cutoff frequency of 13.4 Hz (Winter, 1990). Nine linear and angular velocities were analyzed: (a) maximum pelvis Figure 2 Definition of parameters concerning trunk and lower extremities: (a) forward trunk tilt, (b) upper torso rotation angular velocity (Wu) and pelvis rotation angular velocity (Wp), (c) lead knee flexion, and (d) stride length.
6 6 Matsuo et al. linear velocity; (b) maximum pelvis rotation angular velocity; (c) maximum shoulder horizontal adduction angular velocity; (d) maximum lead knee flexion angular velocity; (e) maximum upper torso rotation angular velocity; (f) maximum forward trunk tilt angular velocity; (g) maximum elbow extension angular velocity; (h) maximum shoulder internal rotation angular velocity; and (i) knee extension angular velocity at the instant of ball release. Stride length was defined as the linear distance from the center of the pitching rubber to the lead ankle marker (Figure 2d). It has been suggested that a large shoulder external rotation induces stretch shortening cycles in shoulder muscles during baseball pitching (Feltner & Dapena, 1986; Feltner, 1989), during handball throwing (Joris, 1985), and during javelin throwing (Morris & Bartlett, 1996). This large shoulder external rotation is assumed to be an important factor in increasing ball or javelin velocity. Therefore, maximum shoulder external rotation was also quantified in the current study. Forward trunk tilt at the instant of ball release was also analyzed, since weight transfer and a longer arm path during the acceleration phase are believed to be critical factors in throwing skills. According to studies on javelin throwing, lead knee movement during the delivery for the good throwers is different from that for the poor throwers (Morris & Bartlett, 1996; Whiting, et al., 1991). Therefore, patterns of lead knee movement were also investigated. Putnum (1993) recommended that joint angular velocities or segment angular velocities should be used for investigating the sequential movements in throwing. Therefore, nine temporal parameters that are primarily related to angular velocities were calculated to investigate differences in temporal patterns of pitching between the high velocity group and the low velocity group. The nine temporal parameters were: (a) time of maximum pelvis linear velocity; (b) time of maximum pelvis rotation angular velocity; (c) time of maximum shoulder horizontal adduction angular velocity; (d) time of maximum lead knee flexion angular velocity; (e) time of maximum upper torso rotation angular velocity; (f) time of maximum shoulder external rotation; (g) time of maximum forward trunk angular velocity; (h) time of maximum elbow extension angular velocity; and (i) time of maximum shoulder internal rotation angular velocity. These temporal parameters were shown as relative values, where 0% corresponded to lead foot contact and 100% corresponded to the instant of ball release. Means and standard deviations of all the parameters were analyzed in each group. Student s t tests were conducted for comparison of techniques used by the two groups. In order to correct for type I errors, the significance level was set at p <.01. Results Body height, arm length, and ball velocity were significantly greater in the high velocity group compared to the low velocity group (Table 1). No significant differences were observed in body mass between these two groups. No significant differences were found in shoulder or elbow angular velocities between the high velocity group and the low velocity group (Table 2). Four of the 12 kinematic parameters were significantly different between the high velocity group and the low velocity group. Compared to the low velocity group, the high velocity group demonstrated significantly less maximum lead knee flexion angular velocity and significantly greater lead knee extension angular velocity at the instant of ball release. Maximum shoulder external rotation and forward trunk tilt at the instant of ball release were significantly greater in the high velocity group compared to the low velocity group.
7 Kinematic and Temporal Parameters 7 Table 2 Comparison of Kinematic Parameters Between High and Low Velocity Groups High velocity Low velocity group (n = 29) group (n = 23) Variable M SD M SD Stride length (% body height) Maximum pelvis linear velocity (m/s) Maximum pelvis rotation angular velocity (º/s) Maximum shoulder horizontal adduction angular velocity (º/s) Maximum lead knee flexion angular velocity (º/s)* Maximum upper torso rotation angular velocity (º/s) Maximum shoulder external rotation (º)* Maximum forward trunk tilt angular velocity (º/s) Maximum elbow extension angular velocity (º/s) Maximum shoulder internal rotation angular velocity (º/s) Lead knee extension angular velocity at the instant of ball release (º/s)* Forward trunk tilt at the instant of ball release (º)* *Significant differences (p <.01) between high and low velocity groups. Table 3 Comparison of Temporal Parameters Between High and Low Velocity Groups High velocity Low velocity group (n = 29) group (n = 23) Variable M SD M SD Maximum pelvis linear velocity Maximum pelvis rotation angular velocity Maximum shoulder horizontal adduction angular velocity Maximum lead knee flexion angular velocity Maximum upper torso rotation angular velocity Maximum shoulder external rotation Maximum elbow extension angular velocity* Maximum forward trunk tilt angular velocity Maximum shoulder internal rotation angular velocity* Note. Each number in the table represents relative percent values, where 0% corresponds to lead foot contact and 100% corresponds to the instant of ball release. Negative values occur before lead foot contact. *Significant differences (p <.01) between high and low velocity groups.
8 8 Matsuo et al. Only two temporal parameters showed significant differences between the high velocity group and the low velocity group (Table 3). Maximum shoulder internal rotation angular velocity occurred just after the instant of ball release, occurring slightly later in the low velocity group compared to the high velocity group. Maximum elbow extension angular velocity occurred just prior to the instant of ball release, occurring slightly later in the low velocity group compared to the high velocity group. No significant difference was Figure 3 Patterns of lead knee movement. The horizontal axis showed the time duration from lead foot contact (0%) to the instant of ball release (100%).
9 Kinematic and Temporal Parameters 9 found between the time durations from lead foot contact to the instant of ball release for the high velocity group and the low velocity group, which were ± s and ± s, respectively. Four common knee movement patterns (types A, B, C, and D) were observed during the relative time interval from lead foot contact to the instant of ball release (Figure 3). For the high velocity group, approximately 80% of subjects were classified into two major patterns, type A and type B. For the low velocity group, however, types A, B, C, and D were all common. The type A pattern showed small knee flexions and extensions between approximately knee angles from 0 60% of the relative time interval, and knee extension from approximately 55 to 30 knee angles between % of the relative time interval. The type A pattern was typical for the high velocity group (69%), but only occurred in 9% of the low velocity group. In contrast, the type B pattern showed progressive knee flexion from approximately knee angles between 0 60% of the relative time interval, and slight knee extension from approximately 50 to 45 knee angles between % of the relative time interval. The type B pattern was observed in 14% of the high velocity group and 26% of the low velocity group. The type C pattern oscillated between approximately knee angles throughout the duration of the relative time interval. The type C pattern occurred in 26% in the low velocity group, but only in 3% of the high velocity group. The type D pattern demonstrated continuous knee flexion from knee angles throughout the 0 100% time interval. The type D pattern occurred in 17% of the low velocity group but was not observed in the high velocity group. Discussion As hypothesized, kinematic and temporal differences were found between the high velocity group and the low velocity group. Moreover, as expected, three of the four kinematic parameters with significant differences were greater in the high velocity group compared to the low velocity group. Using collegiate pitchers, Escamilla et al. NRfu (1998) demonstrated that during the fastball pitch the knee begins extending just prior to maximum shoulder external rotation and continues extending throughout the remainder of the pitch. Concomitant with knee extension, the trunk rotates forward (Escamilla et al., 1998). This relationship between knee extension and forward trunk rotation is important in baseball pitching. During the arm acceleration phase, the high velocity group extended their knees at a greater rate and through a larger range compared to the low velocity group. Since the extending lead knee helps brace and stabilize the lead leg, this may enhance the ability of the trunk to more effectively rotate forward over the braced lead leg. Elliott et al. (1988) also reported that the ability to drive the body over a stabilized lead leg was characteristic of high ball velocity pitchers. Allowing the knee to flex as the instant of ball release is approached may hinder forward trunk rotation and cause the pitcher to throw with a more upright trunk. In javelin throwing, it was found that less flexion of the lead leg during the final double support phase led to a greater release velocity (Bartlett et al., 1996; Morriss & Bartlett, 1996; Whiting et al., 1991). Whiting et al. (1991) also found that better javelin throwers exhibited a clear double flexion-extension pattern, but poorer throwers did not. This double flexion-extension pattern was also observed in the high velocity group (Figure 3, type A). Whiting et al. (1991) suggested the role of the lead leg in javelin throwing was to brace the body, thus allowing the trunk and upper extremities to accelerate forward over a braced lead leg and aid in the transfer of momentum up through the trunk to the throwing arm. Although body movements prior to lead foot contact are completely differ-
10 10 Matsuo et al. ent between baseball pitching and javelin throwing, the role of the lead leg appears the same. The large momentum of the body prior to lead foot contact during baseball pitching is transferred to the lead leg after lead foot contact. A stabilizing leg through knee extension helps transfer energy through the trunk to the throwing arm and may be one of the critical factors for maximizing pitch velocity. The rectus femoris muscle may serve an important role in knee and hip movements during baseball pitching. Morris and Bartlett (1996) assumed that the rectus femoris muscle in the lead leg contracted during the final double support phase first eccentrically and then concentrically in the javelin throw. The same is probably true in baseball pitching. Since the rectus femoris muscle is a two-joint muscle, contraction of this muscle causes both knee extension and hip flexion. Therefore, the concentric activity assumed to be occurring in the rectus femoris as the lead knee extends may also contribute to the increased forward trunk tilt that was demonstrated by the high velocity group. This suggests that strengthening the knee extensor muscles may be important for the throwing athlete, since these muscles help brace the lead leg during pitching. Furthermore, fatigue in these muscles may increase knee flexion and decrease the bracing effect of the lead leg. Fatigue in the knee extensors may also inhibit forward trunk tilt, causing a pitcher to throw with a more upright trunk. Since a braced lead leg may help create angular momentum of the trunk about the trunk s mediolateral and longitudinal axes, we expected that the angular velocities related to trunk movement for the high velocity group would be greater than those for the low velocity group. However, the two groups did not differ in maximum pelvis rotation angular velocity, maximum upper torso rotation angular velocity, and maximum forward trunk tilt angular velocity. Nevertheless, the potential importance of those parameters in generating ball velocity should not be minimized. The high velocity group had significantly greater shoulder external rotation during the arm-cocking phase compared to the low velocity group. This implies that for the high velocity group, the throwing shoulder externally rotated through a greater range of motion during the arm cocking phase. As the shoulder externally rotates, the shoulder internal rotators contract eccentrically to control the rate of shoulder external rotation. Feltner and Dapena (1986) and Fleisig et al. (1996) reported that maximum shoulder internal rotation torque occurred just prior to maximum shoulder external rotation, and suggested that the shoulder internal rotators eccentrically contract during this time and store elastic energy. Moderate to high muscle activity from the shoulder internal rotators have been reported during the arm cocking phase ( DiGiovine et al., 1992; Gowan et al., 1987; Jobe et al., 1983; Jobe et al., 1984). Stored elastic energy, the myotatic reflex, and a greater rate of force production in these pre-stretched and eccentrically contracting muscles may generate more powerful concentric contractions from the shoulder internal rotators during the arm acceleration phase of the pitch. It has been demonstrated that moving through a greater range of motion through increased flexibility can enhance the efficacy of the stretch-shortening cycle (Wilson et al., 1992). Applying force and accelerating the ball over a greater distance enhances ball velocity. Neal et al. (1991) reported that highly skilled throwers were able to move the arm segments through a greater range of movement and into more extreme positions compared to lesser skilled throwers. Since for the high velocity group the ball begins the acceleration phase with a greater amount of shoulder external rotation and ends the acceleration phase with greater forward trunk tilt, the distance the ball traveled was greater in the high veloc-
11 Kinematic and Temporal Parameters 11 ity group compared to the low velocity group. Since the time duration during the acceleration phase was nearly identical for both velocity groups (0.026 ± s for the high velocity group and ± s for the low velocity group), the ball achieved a higher average velocity and acceleration for the high velocity group. It seems, therefore, the linkage of knee extension, trunk rotation, and shoulder external and internal rotations are major contributors to increasing ball velocity. The approximately 4 cm greater total arm length (i.e., humerus plus radius) and 5 cm greater body height in the high velocity group compared to the low velocity group may partially explain why the high velocity group had a 15% greater ball velocity compared to the low velocity group. This is because for a given joint or segment angular velocity, the distal end of a longer segment travels at a greater linear velocity than the distal end of a shorter segment. Although all angular velocities of the trunk and throwing arm for the high velocity group appeared greater (1 8%) compared to the low velocity group, these differences were not significant. Nevertheless, the apparent differences may be important. The additive effects of the slightly increased angular velocities and significantly greater arm length and body height for the high velocity group may result in increased tangential velocities starting with proximal segments (legs and trunk) and ending with distal segments (arms and hand). Consequently, an increase in ball velocity will ensue. During the acceleration phase, the elbow begins extending just prior to maximum shoulder external rotation, while the shoulder begins internally rotating just after maximum shoulder external rotation. The timing between peak angular velocities between elbow extension and shoulder internal rotation is important in optimizing the transfer of energy and momentum from the arm to the ball. Both maximum elbow extension angular velocity and maximum shoulder internal rotation angular velocity occurred earlier in the high velocity group compared to the low velocity group. Furthermore, maximum shoulder internal rotation angular velocity occurred closer to the instant of ball release in the high velocity group compared to the low velocity group. These data imply that the high velocity group may have more optimal timing in generating peak elbow extension and shoulder internal rotation angular velocities compared to the low velocity group. This may partially explain why the high velocity group generated greater ball velocity compared to the low velocity group. Interestingly, in the earlier portion of pitch, the standard deviations of the temporal parameters were diverse, whereas standard deviations in the later part of the pitch were very small (Table 3). This implies that regardless of skill level, leg and trunk movements were most different among subjects, while arm movements were most similar. For the pitchers who have acquired a certain level of throwing skill, the key to increasing ball velocity may be in modifying the earlier part of pitching motion, especially leg and trunk movements. References Abdel-Aziz, Y.I, & Karara, H.M. (1971). Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space in close-range photogrammetry. In ASP ASPUI symposium on close-range photogrammetry (pp. 1-19). Falls Church, VA: American Society of Photogrammetry. Atwater, A.E. (1979). Biomechanics of overarm throwing movements and of throwing injuries. Exercise and sport sciences reviews, 7,
12 12 Matsuo et al. Barrentine, S.W., Matsuo, T., Escamilla, R.F., Fleisig, G.S., & Andrews, J.R. (1998). Kinematic analysis of the wrist and forearm during baseball pitching. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 14, Bartlett, R., Muller, E., Lindinger, S., Brunner, F., & Morriss, C. (1996). Three-dimensional evaluation of the kinematic release parameters for javelin throwers of different skill levels. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 12, DiGiovine, N.M., Jobe, F.W., Pink, M., & Perry, J. (1992). Electromyography of upper extremity in pitching. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 1, Dillman, C.J., Fleisig, G.S., & Andrews, J.R. (1993). Biomechanics of pitching with emphasis upon shoulder kinematics. Journal Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 18, Elliott, B., Grove, J.R., & Gibson, B. (1988). Timing of the lower limb drive and throwing limb movement in baseball pitching. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 4, Escamilla, R.F., Fleisig, G.S., Barrentine, S.W., Zheng, N., & Andrews, J.R. (1998). Kinematic comparisons of throwing different types of baseball pitches. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 14, Feltner, M., & Dapena, J. (1986). Dynamics of the shoulder and elbow joints of throwing arm during a baseball pitch. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 2, Feltner, M.E. (1989). Three-dimensional interactions in a two-segment kinetic chain. Part II: Application to the throwing arm in baseball pitching. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 5, Fleisig, G.S. (1994) The biomechanics of baseball pitching. Doctoral thesis, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Fleisig, G.S., Andrews, J.R., Dillman, C.J., & Escamilla, R.F. (1995). Kinetics of baseball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 23, Fleisig, G.S., Escamilla, R.F., Andrews, J.R., Matsuo, T., Satterwhite, Y., & Barrentine, S.W. (1996). Kinematic and kinetic comparison between baseball pitching and football passing. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 12, Gowan, I.D., Jobe, F.W., Tibone, J.E., Petty, J., & Moynes, D.R. (1987). A comparative electromyographic analysis of the shoulder during pitching. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 15, Jobe, F.W., Tibone, J.E., Perry, J., & Moynes, D. (1983). An EMG analysis of the shoulder in throwing and pitching. A preliminary report. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 11, 3-5. Jobe, F.W., Moynes, D.R., Tibone, J.E., & Perry, J. (1984). An EMG analysis of the shoulder in pitching. A second report. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 12, Joris, H.J., van Muyen A.J., van Ingen Schenau, G.J., & Kemper, H.C. (1985). Force, velocity and energy flow during the overarm throw in female handball players. Journal of Biomechanics, 18, Mero, A., Komi, P.V., Korjus, T., Navarro, E., & Gregor, R.J. (1994). Body segment contributions to javelin throwing during final thrust phases. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 10, Morriss, C., & Bartlett, R. (1996). Biomechanical factors critical for performance in the men s javelin throw. Sports Medicine, 21, Neal, R.J., Snyder, C.W., and Kroonenberg, P.M. (1991). Individual differences and segment interactions in throwing. Human Movement Science, 10, Putnam, C.A. (1993). Sequential motions of body segments in striking and throwing skills: descriptions and explanations. Journal of Biomechanics, 26, Sakurai, S., Ikegami, Y., Okamamo, A., Yabe, K., & Toyoshima, S. (1993). A three-dimensional cinematographic analysis of upper limb movement during fastball and curveball baseball pitches. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 9, Shapiro, R. (1978). Direct linear transformation method for three-dimensional cinematography. Research Quarterly, 49, Vaughan, R.E. (1985). An Algorithm for Determining Arm Action During Overarm Baseball Pitches. In D.A. Winter (Ed.), Biomechanics IX-B (pp ). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
13 Kinematic and Temporal Parameters 13 Whiting, W.C., Gregor, R.J., & Halushka, M. (1991). Body segment and release parameter contributions to new-rules javelin throwing. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 7, Wilson, G.J., Elliott, B.C., and Wood, G.A. (1992). Stretch shorten cycle performance enhancement through flexibility training. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 24, Winter, D.A. (1990). Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. New York: Wiley Interscience. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Anthony Demonia and Phillip Sutton for their assistance in collecting and digitizing the data.
Relationship of Biomechanical Factors to Baseball Pitching Velocity: Within Pitcher Variation
44 JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 21, 44-56 2005 Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc. Relationship of Biomechanical Factors to Baseball Pitching Velocity: Within Pitcher Variation David F. Stodden 1,
More informationThe Biomechanics of Baseball Pitching
The Biomechanics of Baseball Pitching Glenn S. Fleisig, Ph.D. The Biomechanics of Baseball Pitching Established American Sports Medicine Institute (ASMI) in 1987 PhD dissertation in 1994 Keynote presentation
More informationBiomechanics of Overarm Throwing. Deborah L. King, PhD
Biomechanics of Overarm Throwing Deborah L. King, PhD Ithaca College, Department of Exercise and Sport Science Outline Review Fundamental Concepts Breakdown Throwing Motion o Identify Key Movements o Examine
More informationCharacteristic Ground-Reaction Forces in Baseball Pitching*
0363-5465/98/2626-0066$02.00/0 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, Vol. 26, No. 1 1998 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Characteristic Ground-Reaction Forces in Baseball Pitching*
More informationKinematics and Kinetics of Elite Windmill Softball Pitching
Kinematics and Kinetics of Elite Windmill Softball Pitching Sherry L. Werner,* PhD, Deryk G. Jones, MD, John A. Guido, Jr, MHS, PT, SCS, ATC, CSCS, and Michael E. Brunet, MD From the Tulane Institute of
More informationDynamics of Vertical Jumps
Dr Stelios G. Psycharakis Dynamics of Vertical Jumps School of Life, Sport & Social Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK Introduction A vertical jump is a movement that is used in a plethora
More informationInjury Prevention Strategies and Mechanics for Softball Players. Jason Yoder, DPT. Clinic Coordinator Sports Rehab Center for Sports Medicine
Injury Prevention Strategies and Mechanics for Softball Players Jason Yoder, DPT Clinic Coordinator Sports Rehab Center for Sports Medicine Objectives Identify similarities and differences among the sports
More informationEffects of Upper Trunk Rotation on Shoulder Joint Torque Among Baseball Pitchers of Various Levels
Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 2007; 23:42-51. 2007 Human Kinetics, Inc. Effects of Upper Trunk Rotation on Shoulder Joint Torque Among Baseball Pitchers of Various Levels Arnel L. Aguinaldo, Janet Buttermore,
More informationSoftball Pitching Technique Softball Pitching Technique FIG. 1:
1 Softball Pitching Technique Marion J.L. Alexander, PhD. Carolyn Taylor, MSc Sport Biomechanics Laboratory Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management University of Manitoba Softball Pitching Technique
More informationTerminology of Human Walking From North American Society for Gait and Human Movement 1993 and AAOP Gait Society 1994
Gait Cycle: The period of time from one event (usually initial contact) of one foot to the following occurrence of the same event with the same foot. Abbreviated GC. Gait Stride: The distance from initial
More informationUSA Baseball Medical & Safety Advisory Committee Guidelines: May 2006
USA Baseball Medical & Safety Advisory Committee Guidelines: May 2006 Position Statement Baseball is one of the safest sports available for today s youth. However, many of the serious injuries suffered
More informationBiomechanics in javelin throwing
Biomechanics in javelin throwing with special reference to feedback for coaching Jukka Viitasalo KIHU Research Institute for Olympic Sports Jyväskylä, Finland Contents 1. Biomechanical background in javelin
More informationPhysics 160 Biomechanics. Angular Kinematics
Physics 160 Biomechanics Angular Kinematics Questions to think about Why do batters slide their hands up the handle of the bat to lay down a bunt but not to drive the ball? Why might an athletic trainer
More informationHow to increase Bat Speed & Bat Quickness / Acceleration
How to increase Bat Speed & Bat Quickness / Acceleration What is Bat Speed? Bat Speed: Bat speed is measured in miles per hour (MPH) and considers only the highest speed of the bat head (peak velocity)
More informationTHE JAVELIN THROW AND THE ROLE OF SPEED IN THROWING EVENTS
THE JAVELIN THROW AND THE ROLE OF SPEED IN THROWING EVENTS By Peter Ogiolda German coach Peter Ogiolda presents an analysis of the different phases of the javelin technique and examines the importance
More informationKINEMATICS OF DROP PUNT KICKING IN AUSTRALIAN RULES FOOTBALL COMPARISON OF SKILLED AND LESS SKILLED KICKING
KINEMATICS OF DROP PUNT KICKING IN AUSTRALIAN RULES FOOTBALL COMPARISON OF SKILLED AND LESS SKILLED KICKING By SAM MILLAR A Master s Thesis Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Award of
More information4 Energy transformations in the pole vault
358 Chapter IV. Elasticity 4 Energy transformations in the pole vault Abstract by N.P. Linthorne Centre for Sports Medicine and Human Performance, School of Sport and Education, Brunel University, Uxbridge,
More informationUnderstanding Planes and Axes of Movement
Understanding Planes and Axes of Movement Terminology When describing the relative positions of the body parts or relationship between those parts it is advisable to use the same standard terminology.
More informationOverhead Throwing: A Strength & Conditioning Approach to Preventative Injury
By: Michael E. Bewley, MA, CSCS, C-SPN, USAW-I, President, Optimal Nutrition Systems Strength & Conditioning Coach for Basketball Sports Nutritionist for Basketball University of Dayton Overhead Throwing:
More informationComparison of range of motion tests with throwing performance and kinematics in elite team-handball players
Comparison of range of motion tests with throwing performance and kinematics in elite team-handball players Roland van den Tillaar Ph.D. Sports Sciences Department University College of Nord Trøndelag
More informationAthletics (Throwing) Questions Javelin, Shot Put, Hammer, Discus
Athletics (Throwing) Questions Javelin, Shot Put, Hammer, Discus Athletics is a sport that contains a number of different disciplines. Some athletes concentrate on one particular discipline while others
More informationKIN 335 - Biomechanics LAB: Ground Reaction Forces - Linear Kinetics
KIN 335 - Biomechanics LAB: Ground Reaction Forces - Linear Kinetics Reading Assignment: 1) Luhtanen, P. and Komi, P.V. (1978). Segmental contribution to forces in vertical jump. European Journal of Applied
More informationAcceleration Introduction: Objectives: Methods:
Acceleration Introduction: Acceleration is defined as the rate of change of velocity with respect to time, thus the concepts of velocity also apply to acceleration. In the velocity-time graph, acceleration
More informationFollowing a shoulder or elbow injury or surgery, a baseball
[ research report ] GLENN S. FLEISIG, PhD 1 BECKY BOLT, MS 2 DAVE FORTENBAUGH, MS 3 KEVIN E. WILK, DPT 4 JAMES R. ANDREWS, MD 5 Biomechanical Comparison of Baseball Pitching and Long-Toss: Implications
More informationInterval Throwing Program for Baseball Players Phase I
Interval Throwing Program for Baseball Players Phase I The interval Throwing Program (ITP) is designed to gradually return motion, strength and confidence in the throwing arm after injury or surgery by
More informationLanding Biomechanics Utilizing Different Tasks: Implications in ACL Injury Research. Adam Hernandez Erik Swartz, PhD ATC Dain LaRoche, PhD
A Gender Comparison of Lower Extremity Landing Biomechanics Utilizing Different Tasks: Implications in ACL Injury Research Adam Hernandez Erik Swartz, PhD ATC Dain LaRoche, PhD Anterior Cruciate Ligament
More informationACL plastik, erfarenheter av. tidig kirurgisk behandling. tidig kirurgisk behandling 6/12/2013
in sports Per Renström, MD, PhD Professor emeritus,,, Sweden Member ATP and ITF Sports Science and Medical Committees Physician Swedish Football Association Presentation at the IOC Advanced team physician
More informationPrevention & Management of ACL Injury. Ian Horsley PhD, MCSP Lee Herrington PhD, MCSP
Prevention & Management of ACL Injury Ian Horsley PhD, MCSP Lee Herrington PhD, MCSP ACL injury ACL injury 30/100,000, 40% sports injuries (NHS) Limited statistics in UK related to sport Rugby Union 2002-2004
More informationRehabilitation Guidelines for Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) Reconstruction
Rehabilitation Guidelines for Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) Reconstruction The elbow is a complex system of three joints formed from three bones; the humerus (the upper arm bone), the ulna (the
More informationJAVELIN TRAINING IN FINLAND
JAVELIN TRAINING IN FINLAND By Esa Utriainen A comparison of the development and training of male and female javelin throwers in Finland, looking at physical differences, strength development, natural
More informationMovement Pa+ern Analysis and Training in Athletes 02/13/2016
Objec:ves Movement Pa+ern Analysis and Training in Athletes Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences Appreciate the importance of movement pa+ern analysis and training in treahng athletes
More informationMuscle Movements, Types, and Names
Muscle Movements, Types, and Names A. Gross Skeletal Muscle Activity 1. With a few exceptions, all muscles cross at least one joint 2. Typically, the bulk of the muscle lies proximal to the joint it crossed
More informationDeveloping Event Specific Strength for the Javelin Throw Michael Young Louisiana State University
1 Developing Event Specific Strength for the Javelin Throw Michael Young Louisiana State University *****This is a modified version of an article published in Track Coach The training for track and field
More informationInterval Sport Programs: Guidelines for Baseball, Tennis, and Golf
Interval Sport Programs: Guidelines for Baseball, Tennis, and Golf Michael M. Reinold, PT 1,2 Kevin E. Wilk, PT 1,2,3 Jamie Reed, ATC 4 Ken Crenshaw, ATC 4 James R. Andrews, MD 5,6 TECHNICAL NOTE INTRODUCTION
More informationBiomechanical Analysis of the Deadlift (aka Spinal Mechanics for Lifters) Tony Leyland
Biomechanical Analysis of the Deadlift (aka Spinal Mechanics for Lifters) Tony Leyland Mechanical terminology The three directions in which forces are applied to human tissues are compression, tension,
More informationReview of Last Lecture - TE
Gait Review of Last Lecture - TE Interventions to increase flexibility Generating muscle force depends on Open chain vs. closed chain PNF Balance strategies Benefits of aerobic exercise Gait An individual
More informationRehabilitation after ACL Reconstruction: From the OR to the Playing Field. Mark V. Paterno PT, PhD, MBA, SCS, ATC
Objectives Rehabilitation after ACL Reconstruction: From the OR to the Playing Field Mark V. Paterno PT, PhD, MBA, SCS, ATC Coordinator of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy Cincinnati Children s
More informationRead a chapter on Angular Kinematics
Read a chapter on Angular Kinematics Angular Kinematics Hamill & Knutzen (Ch 9) Hay (Ch. 4), Hay & Ried (Ch. 10), Kreighbaum & Barthels (Module Ι) or Hall (Ch. 11) Reporting Angles Measurement of Angles
More informationPitching Drills. Our philosophies/goals
Pitching Drills Each of these drills can be done at home, inside. None of these drills involve throwing a baseball. Instead, they focus on creating muscle memory. The towel drills can be done either with
More informationGALLAND/KIRBY UCL RECONSTRUCTION (TOMMY JOHN) POST-SURGICAL REHABILITATION PROTOCOL
GALLAND/KIRBY UCL RECONSTRUCTION (TOMMY JOHN) POST-SURGICAL REHABILITATION PROTOCOL INTRODUCTION The ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction is a tendon transfer procedure. No muscles are transected during
More informationComparison of Film and Video Techniques for Estimating Three-Dimensional Coordinates within a Large Field
TECHNICAL NOTES INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT BIOMECHANICS, 1992,8, 145-151 Comparison of Film and Video Techniques for Estimating Three-Dimensional Coordinates within a Large Field Rosa M. Angulo and
More informationOPTIMAL CORE TRAINING FOR FUNCTIONAL GAINS AND PEAK PERFORMANCE: CXWORX
OPTIMAL CORE TRAINING FOR FUNCTIONAL GAINS AND PEAK PERFORMANCE: CXWORX Jinger S. Gottschall 1, Jackie Mills 2, and Bryce Hastings 2 1 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA 2 Les Mills
More informationStretching for Young Athletes. Shawn P. Anderson, SPT Duke University Doctor of Physical Therapy
Stretching for Young Athletes Shawn P. Anderson, SPT Duke University Doctor of Physical Therapy Sports and exercise are usually integral parts of many adolescents life. Whether they play at school or in
More informationLEVEL I SKATING TECHNICAL. September 2007 Page 1
SKATING September 2007 Page 1 SKATING SKILLS The game of Ice Hockey is a fast-paced, complex, team sport, which demands quick thinking, fast reactions and special athletic skills. Skating is the most important
More informationFUNDAMENTALS OF SHOT PUT TECHNIQUE
Mike Maynard UCLA Head Men s T&F/ CC Coach 310-405-1354 mmaynard@athletics.ucla.edu FUNDAMENTALS OF SHOT PUT TECHNIQUE The glide shot put has increasingly become somewhat of a technical relic. The USA,
More informationLab #7 - Joint Kinetics and Internal Forces
Purpose: Lab #7 - Joint Kinetics and Internal Forces The objective of this lab is to understand how to calculate net joint forces (NJFs) and net joint moments (NJMs) from force data. Upon completion of
More informationBiomechanics and fast bowling. By Adam Kelly
Biomechanics and fast bowling By Adam Kelly History of fast bowling Underarm bowling until 1828 (Dellor 2010) MCC approved Over-arm in 1864 (Dellor 2010) Back foot drag technique (Perves 2001) Modern day
More informationPlyometric Training for Track and Field Indiana High School Clinic 2008 Larry Judge, Ph.D. Ball State University
Plyometric Training for Track and Field Indiana High School Clinic 2008 Larry Judge, Ph.D. Ball State University What is Plyometric Training? Exercises like hopping, skipping, jumping, bounding, depth
More informationThis week. CENG 732 Computer Animation. Challenges in Human Modeling. Basic Arm Model
CENG 732 Computer Animation Spring 2006-2007 Week 8 Modeling and Animating Articulated Figures: Modeling the Arm, Walking, Facial Animation This week Modeling the arm Different joint structures Walking
More informationThe Examination...2. Pitching Mechanics...4. Core Exercises...5. Scapular Stretches...7. Scapular Exercises...8. Summary...10. Pitch Counts...
Table of Contents The Examination....2 Pitching Mechanics...4 Core Exercises....5 Scapular Stretches...7 Scapular Exercises...8 Summary...10 Pitch Counts...12 Introduction Here at Vanderbilt Sports Medicine,
More informationFour-week specific training to increase speed, power and agility
Four-week specific training to increase speed, power and agility Adam King B.S., David Buchanan RKT, Kevin Barcal B.S. Completed at ProSport Training and Rehab., Inc. Rolling Meadows, IL www.prosporttraining.com
More informationXco-Trainer: empty talk or real effect?
Xco-Trainer: empty talk or real effect? By: R. van Bruinessen, S. Couzy, P. van Doorn, K. den Hertog, A. Weimar, G. van de Wetering. Summary This study examined the difference in muscle activity between
More informationPenalty Stroke in Field Hockey: A Biomechanical Study
ISSN 1750-9823 (print) International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering Vol. 05 (2011) No. 01, pp. 053-057 Penalty Stroke in Field Hockey: A Biomechanical Study Ikram Hussain 1, Arif Mohammad 2,
More informationDr. Larry VanSuch s BASEBALL SWING MECHANICS. Identifying the movements and muscles of the baseball swing for exceptional hitting!
Dr. Larry VanSuch s BASEBALL SWING MECHANICS Identifying the movements and muscles of the baseball swing for exceptional hitting! Copyright 2013 by Dr. Larry VanSuch. First Edition. All rights reserved.
More informationDr. Enas Elsayed. Brunnstrom Approach
Brunnstrom Approach Learning Objectives: By the end of this lab, the student will be able to: 1. Demonstrate different reflexes including stimulus and muscle tone response. 2. Demonstrate how to evoke
More informationC B A T 3 T 2 T 1. 1. What is the magnitude of the force T 1? A) 37.5 N B) 75.0 N C) 113 N D) 157 N E) 192 N
Three boxes are connected by massless strings and are resting on a frictionless table. Each box has a mass of 15 kg, and the tension T 1 in the right string is accelerating the boxes to the right at a
More informationInternational Standards for the Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Motor Exam Guide
C5 Elbow Flexors Biceps Brachii, Brachialis Patient Position: The shoulder is in neutral rotation, neutral flexion/extension, and adducted. The elbow is fully extended, with the forearm in full supination.
More informationChapter 6. Components of Elasticity. Musculotendinous Unit. Behavioral Properties of the Musculotendinous Unit. Biomechanics of Skeletal Muscle
Chapter 6 Behavioral Properties of the Musculotendinous Unit 1) extensibility: ability to be stretched or to increase in length 2) elasticity: ability to return to normal resting length following a stretch
More informationPassive Range of Motion Exercises
Exercise and ALS The physical or occupational therapist will make recommendations for exercise based upon each patient s specific needs and abilities. Strengthening exercises are not generally recommended
More informationBiomechanics of cycling - Improving performance and reducing injury through biomechanics
Biomechanics of cycling - Improving performance and reducing injury through biomechanics Biomechanics is the science concerned with the forces that act on the human body and the effects these forces produce.
More informationThe 11+ A complete warm-up program
The 11+ A complete warm-up program Part 1 & 3 A A }6m Part 2 B A: Running B: Jog back B! FIELD SET-UP A: Running exercise B: Jog back The course is made up of 6 pairs of parallel cones, approx. 5-6m apart.
More informationRange of Motion Exercises
Range of Motion Exercises Range of motion (ROM) exercises are done to preserve flexibility and mobility of the joints on which they are performed. These exercises reduce stiffness and will prevent or at
More informationUnder 20 of rotation the accuracy of data collected by 2D software is maintained?
Under 20 of rotation the accuracy of data collected by 2D software is maintained? Introduction This study was undertaken in order to validate the Quintic two-dimensional software. Unlike threedimensional
More informationOver the past 15 years
Resistance Training to Develop Increased Bat Velocity David J. Szymanski, PhD, CSCS,*D Over the past 15 years the sport of baseball has changed tremendously in the way players prepare in the off season.
More informationJOINT PAIN IN THE ADOLESCENT
JOINT PAIN IN THE ADOLESCENT HOW SERIOUS CAN THAT BE? ROBERT A. KELLY, M.D. RESURGENS ORTHOPAEDICS JOINT PAIN IN THE ADOLESCENT INJURIES ABOUT JOINTS CAN BE CLASSIFIED AS EITHER: ACUTE/TRAUMATIC OR REPETITIVE/OVERUSE
More informationGait with Assistive Devices
Gait with Assistive Devices Review Last Lecture Weak dorsiflexors? Vaulting? Hip hiking? Weak hip abductors? Hip circumduction? Ataxic gait? Antalgic gait? Explain the line of gravity Ambulation with Assistive
More informationKnee Conditioning Program. Purpose of Program
Prepared for: Prepared by: OrthoInfo Purpose of Program After an injury or surgery, an exercise conditioning program will help you return to daily activities and enjoy a more active, healthy lifestyle.
More informationTHE SPEED PROGRAM THE following is A list Of POinTS THAT PRODucE RESulTS in SPEED improvement: CHANGE THE GAME
THE SPEED PROGRAM Remember, perfect technique is the #1 emphasis with the BFS Speed Program. Faster times will follow perfect technique. The Speed Program is as follows: 1. Start with a Sprint Learning
More informationGait. Maturation of Gait Beginning ambulation ( Infant s gait ) Upper Limb. Lower Limb
Gait Terminology Gait Cycle : from foot strike to foot strike Gait Phase : stance (60%) : swing (40%) Velocity : horizontal speed along progression Cadence : no. of steps per unit time Step length : distance
More informationRisk of Serious Injury for Young Baseball Pitchers
AJSM PreView, published on November 23, 2010 as doi:10.1177/0363546510384224 Risk of Serious Injury for Young Baseball Pitchers A 10-Year Prospective Study Glenn S. Fleisig,* y PhD, James R. Andrews,*
More informationOverhead Strength Training for the Shoulder: Guidelines for Injury Prevention and Performance Training Success
Overhead Strength Training for the Shoulder: Guidelines for Injury Prevention and Performance Training Success Robert Panariello MS, PT, ATC, CSCS Strength training is an important component in the overall
More informationTHE INFLUENCE OF WALL PAINTING ON SHOULDER MUSCLE ACTIVITY AND HORIZONTAL PUSH FORCE
THE INFLUENCE OF WALL PAINTING ON SHOULDER MUSCLE ACTIVITY AND HORIZONTAL PUSH FORCE Background: Patricia M. Rosati and Clark R. Dickerson Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
More informationDEFENSE Warm-Up Arm Warm up with starting light and gradually throw harder. Spend 5-15 minutes. OFFENSE
10-12 Year Old Practice Format & Outline (1-2 Hour) Begin each practice with Team Announcements & Warm Up Lap Stretch i.e., Upper & Lower Body Form Run (Agility) i.e., High Knees, Power Skips, Shuffle,
More informationUnit 4 Practice Test: Rotational Motion
Unit 4 Practice Test: Rotational Motion Multiple Guess Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. How would an angle in radians be converted to an angle
More informationPHY121 #8 Midterm I 3.06.2013
PHY11 #8 Midterm I 3.06.013 AP Physics- Newton s Laws AP Exam Multiple Choice Questions #1 #4 1. When the frictionless system shown above is accelerated by an applied force of magnitude F, the tension
More informationSports technology, Science and Coaching
Running title xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sports technology, Science and Coaching V. Linnamo 1, O. Ohtonen 1, W. Rapp 2, P.Komi 1, S.Lindinger 3 1 Department of Biology of Physical Activity,
More informationCompensation for Interaction Torques During Single- and Multijoint Limb Movement
Compensation for Interaction Torques During Single- and Multijoint Limb Movement PAUL L. GRIBBLE AND DAVID J. OSTRY McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada Gribble, Paul L. and David J. Ostry.
More informationJUNIPERO SERRA VOLLEYBALL OFF SEASON TRAINING SCHEDULE
JUNIPERO SERRA VOLLEYBALL OFF SEASON TRAINING SCHEDULE 2007 OFF SEASON WORKOUT Our off season workout is centered around Speed, Agility & Quickness which are athletic attributes that are very trainable
More informationAngular acceleration α
Angular Acceleration Angular acceleration α measures how rapidly the angular velocity is changing: Slide 7-0 Linear and Circular Motion Compared Slide 7- Linear and Circular Kinematics Compared Slide 7-
More informationPlyometric Training. Plyometric Training. chapter
chapter 16 Plyometric Training Plyometric Training David H. Potach, PT; MS; CSCS,*D; NSCA-CPT,*D Donald A. Chu, PhD; PT; ATC; CSCS,*D; NSCA-CPT,*D; FNSCA Chapter Objectives Explain the physiology of plyometric
More informationYouth Thrower s Elbow
Youth Thrower s Elbow Description Youth Thrower s elbow is an inflammatory condition involving the growth plate of the humerus, near the inner elbow at the medial epicondyle.(figure 1) This condition is
More informationPre-Season Pitching Program
Pre-Season Pitching Program One of the biggest challenges facing a coach is determining the best way to prepare pitchers for the opening of practice or tryouts. In professional baseball, managers pretty
More informationVertiMax V8 Vertical Jump & Speed Training Program
ANY ATHLETE, ANY SPORT, VERTIMAX WILL TAKE YOU TO THE NEXT LEVEL VertiMax V8 Vertical Jump & Speed Training Program Advanced Off Platform Speed Training Simultaneous leg & arm loading for maximum vertical
More informationStrength Exercises for Improved Running Biomechanics
2 CHAPTER Strength Exercises for Improved Running Biomechanics ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssdd s Many gait abnormalities seen
More informationRange of Motion. A guide for you after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Program
Range of Motion A guide for you after spinal cord injury Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Program This booklet has been written by the health care providers who provide care to people who have a spinal
More informationPattern Characterization of Running and Cutting Maneuvers in Relation to Noncontact
Pattern Characterization of Running and Cutting Maneuvers in Relation to Noncontact ACL Injury Brenna Hearn During running and cutting maneuvers, the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is commonly injured
More informationBasic Principles of Strength Training and Conditioning
Basic Principles of Strength Training and Conditioning John M. Cissik, MS, CSCS Whether you are a recreational weight trainer, a weekend athlete, or a strength coach working with elite athletes, it is
More informationUlnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Tommy John Surgery. Neal McIvor, Alyssa Pfanner, Caleb Sato
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Tommy John Surgery By Neal McIvor, Alyssa Pfanner, Caleb Sato Case Study 21 y.o. Male Collegiate Baseball Pitcher Right elbow preoperatively diagnosed: UCL rupture
More informationPhysical parameters and performance values in starters and non-starters volleyball players: A brief research note
Motricidade Fundação Técnica e Científica do Desporto 2009, 5 (3), 7-11 ISSN 1646 107X Physical parameters and performance values in starters and non-starters volleyball players: A brief research note
More informationThe coordinated movement of the lumbo pelvic hip complex during running: a literature review
Gait and Posture 10 (1999) 30 47 www.elsevier.com/locate/gaitpos Review article The coordinated movement of the lumbo pelvic hip complex during running: a literature review Anthony G. Schache a, *, Kim
More informationStretching in the Office
Stretching in the Office Legs: Quads, Hamstrings, IT band, Hip flexors, Gluts, Calves Quads: Standing @ desk maintaining upright posture, grab one leg @ a time by foot or ankle and bring it towards backside
More informationTennessee State University
Tennessee State University Dept. of Physics & Mathematics PHYS 2010 CF SU 2009 Name 30% Time is 2 hours. Cheating will give you an F-grade. Other instructions will be given in the Hall. MULTIPLE CHOICE.
More informationFlexibility Assessment and Improvement Compiled and Adapted by Josh Thompson
Flexibility Assessment and Improvement Compiled and Adapted by Josh Thompson Muscles must have a full and normal range of motion in order for joints and skeletal structure to function properly. Flexibility
More informationThe Role of Hip Rotation in Freestyle Swimming Introduction Shoulder Girdle Rotation
1 The Role of Hip Rotation in Freestyle Swimming Marion Alexander, PhD, Julie Hayward, BKIN, Yumeng Li, B KIN. Sport Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Manitoba Introduction Hip rotation in freestyle
More informationLab 8: Ballistic Pendulum
Lab 8: Ballistic Pendulum Equipment: Ballistic pendulum apparatus, 2 meter ruler, 30 cm ruler, blank paper, carbon paper, masking tape, scale. Caution In this experiment a steel ball is projected horizontally
More informationCoordination and timing of spine and hip joints during full body reaching tasks
Human Movement Science 26 (2007) 124 140 www.elsevier.com/locate/humov Coordination and timing of spine and hip joints during full body reaching tasks James S. Thomas *, Gary E. Gibson School of Physical
More informationData-Based Interval Throwing Programs for Little League, High School, College, and Professional Baseball Pitchers
Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review 9:24 34 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia Data-Based Interval Throwing Programs for Little League, High School, College, and Professional Baseball
More informationLab #4 - Linear Impulse and Momentum
Purpose: Lab #4 - Linear Impulse and Momentum The objective of this lab is to understand the linear and angular impulse/momentum relationship. Upon completion of this lab you will: Understand and know
More informationNo Equipment Agility/Core/Strength Program for Full Body No Equip Trainer: Rick Coe
No Equipment Agility/Core/Strength Program for Full Body No Equip Trainer: Rick Coe Introduction Program designed to be performed in a circuit. Perform exercises in sequence without rest 2-3 times. Increase
More information