July Prepared for:
|
|
- Janice Hutchinson
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 002699_ID18_04-B2235 Greenpoint Petroleum Remediation Project (Off-Site Plume Area) Vapor Intrusion/Indoor Air Sampling Report for the 2006/2007 Heating Season Site No. S Brooklyn, New York July 2007 Prepared for: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Division of Environmental Remediation 625 Broadway Albany, New York Ecology and Environment Engineering, P.C.
2 T able of Contents Section Page 1 Introduction Purpose Site History Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling Introduction Pre-sample Planning and Community Participation Pre-sampling Inspection Sampling Procedures Sub-slab Vapor Ambient Air sampling Quality Control Sample Analysis Data Validation Analytical Results References Appendix A NYSDEC Sampling Program Letters... A-1 B Indoor Air Quality Questionnaire and Building Inspection Form... B-1 C Laboratory Analytical Data Reports... C-1 D Data Usability Summary Reports for Laboratory Analytical Data... D-1 02:002699_ID18_04-B2235 R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07 iii
3 L ist of Tables Table Page 2-1 Greenpoint Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sample Collection Summary, 2006/2007 Heating Season, Brooklyn, New York Vapor Intrusion Investigation Results, 2006/2007 Heating Season, Greenpoint Residential Study Area, Brooklyn, New York :002699_ID18_04-B2235 R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07 v
4 L ist of Figures Figure Page 1-1 Greenpoint Vapor Intrusion Project Area, Greenpoint, Brooklyn, New York Greenpoint Vapor Intrusion Sample Location Map, Greenpoint Brooklyn, New York, December 06 through March :002699_ID18_04-B2235 R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07 vii
5 L ist of Acronyms ADR ASP ASTM COC DER DUSR EEEPC ELAP GC/MS ml µg/m 3 NAPL NYSDEC NYSDOH NYSOAG NYSOSC PID ppb ppbv ppm Automated Data Review Analytical Services Protocol American Society for Testing and Materials chain-of-custody Division of Environmental Remediation Data Usability Summary Report Ecology and Environment Engineering, P.C. Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program gas chromatography/mass spectrometry milliliter micrograms per cubic meter non-aqueous phase liquid New York State Department of Environmental Conservation New York State Department of Health New York State Office of the Attorney General New York State Office of the State Comptroller photoionization detector parts per billion parts per billion by volume parts per million 02:002699_ID18_04-B2235 R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07 ix
6 List of Acronyms (Cont.) ppmv QAPP QC USEPA VOC parts per million by volume Quality Assurance Project Plan quality control United States Environmental Protection Agency volatile organic compound 02:002699_ID18_04_00 R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07 x
7 1 Introduction Pursuant to Work Assignment No. D , Ecology and Environment Engineering, P.C. (EEEPC) has prepared this vapor intrusion sampling report on behalf of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), Division of Environmental Remediation (DER), for services associated with the Greenpoint Petroleum Remediation Project (Off-Site Plume Area - Site No. S224087), located in Brooklyn, Kings County, New York. 1.1 Purpose The purpose of the vapor intrusion investigation described herein is to provide analytical data to evaluate possible exposure concerns related to chemical vapors from the underlying historical and current free product (petroleum) from the Greenpoint site. The work described here involved sampling vapor from below the basement slab or lowest floor level of structures, basement ambient air, first floor ambient air, and/or outdoor air to determine and evaluate the possibility of vapor intrusion from the subsurface into these structures. The results of the investigation are expected to be used by NYSDEC and the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) for future planning. NYSDOH will evaluate chemical exposure hazards, if any, and make structure-specific recommendations to property owners. 1.2 Site History Petroleum refining within the Greenpoint area began in More than 50 refineries had been established along Newton Creek by 1870, which produced fuel oils, gasoline, kerosene, and refinery oil. Refinery operations ceased in 1966, and petroleum bulk storage discontinued in 1993 on the ExxonMobil-owned properties of the former refinery parcels. British Petroleum began operation of a bulk fuel storage terminal in 1969, which continues to operate today (New York State Department of Conservation January 2007). On September 2, 1978, the U.S. Coast Guard discovered an oil spill entering Newtown Creek from Meeker Avenue. In 1979, an investigation of the spill beneath the Greenpoint area determined the release to be approximately 52 acres, with the total spill volume consisting of approximately 17 million gallons of petroleum products. 02:002699_ID18_04-B R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07
8 1. Introduction Subsurface petroleum product recovery has been occurring in areas of Greenpoint since 1979 and include the former ExxonMobil Brooklyn Terminal, the BP Brooklyn Terminal, the former Paragon Oil Terminal, and the ExxonMobil offsite treatment system located at the corner of Meeker Avenue and Bridgewater Street. In addition to the recovery systems, both hard and soft booms are deployed on parts of Newtown Creek to contain various petroleum seeps. As of 2006, approximately 9.5 million gallons of product had been recovered from the plume areas. The spill area beneath Greenpoint consists of a plume of light, non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) occurring near the top of the water table. Recent investigations estimate the plume currently extends as far north as the ExxonMobil Brooklyn Terminal, as far south as the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, and to the west to an area located between Monitor Street and Kingsland Avenue. Free product has impacted both a shallow aquifer and a deeper regional aquifer. 02:002699_ID18_04-B R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07
9
10 2 Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling 2.1 Introduction The vapor intrusion sampling investigation was completed at 52 properties in the Greenpoint area of Brooklyn (see Table 2-1 and Figure 2-1). The study area was selected by NYSDEC and consisted primarily of residential structures with some commercial operations. Sampling was conducted at structures for which property owners and tenants had volunteered and provided permission. EEEPC assisted NYSDEC in obtaining permission from 36 homeowners to complete the vapor intrusion sampling at various locations throughout the study area. In addition, NYSDEC was contacted in February 2007 by representatives of an additional 22 homeowners located in the study area who were also interested in vapor intrusion sampling. Of the 22 homes, EEEPC was able to sample 16 locations during the 2006/2007 heating season. In accordance with EEEPC s revised Work Plan for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring at the Greenpoint Site (EEEPC January 2007), the vapor intrusion investigation included concurrently collecting vapor/air samples from beneath the building slab, ambient basement air, ambient air from the first floor (if the basement was not used as living space), and ambient outdoor air. Presample inspections and sampling activities were conducted in accordance with NYSDOH s November 2006 Standard Operating Procedure, Soil Vapor Intrusion in New York State. Figure 2-1 depicts all locations where soil vapor intrusion sampling was conducted during the 2006/2007 heating season. 2.2 Pre-sample Planning and Community Participation Before sampling, EEEPC assisted NYSDEC with various tasks related to finding volunteers from the community to participate in the sampling program. The following steps were taken by EEEPC and NYSDEC to obtain volunteers: A study area for the initial sampling was selected by NYSDEC in consultation with other state agencies, including NYSDOH, the New York State Office of the Attorney General (NYSOAG), and the New York State Office of the State Comptroller (NYSOSC). A website was created by NYSDEC to inform the general public about Greenpoint s operation and remedial history, current remediation and containment 02:002699_ID18_04-B R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07
11 2. Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling methods, the soil vapor and residential vapor intrusion investigation, and contact information for key personnel. NYSDEC was contacted by 12 residents in the area at the beginning of the project who were interested in having their residences sampled. NYSDEC passed the contact information about these residents to EEEPC to coordinate completion of an access agreement form and to schedule sampling. EEEPC developed a database of owner/tenant information based on a list of parcels of potential sampling sites provided by NYSDEC. The database used real property tax information to find owner names and mailing addresses for addresses located within the study area. NYSDEC generated a standard letter that was sent to each property owner that described the sampling program and the process of collecting the samples and requested that owners with an interest in participating in the study return a signed access permission form to NYSDEC. The mailing was then translated into Spanish and Polish, and a package containing the information written in all three languages English, Spanish, and Polish was sent to 388 property owners on November 29, The information package included a cover letter, map of the study area, description of sampling procedures, a list of frequently asked questions and answers, and an access permission form. Copies of all three packages are located in Appendix A. Approximately 30 of the letters in the first mailing were returned to EEEPC because of an incorrect mailing address. Information packages were readdressed to Resident at the subject property address and were mailed on January 17, EEEPC researched public information channels (telephone books, Internet, etc.) to obtain telephone numbers for property owners and residents who had not responded to the first mailing. Approximately 220 residents were telephoned by EEEPC in January 2007 to discuss volunteering for the sampling program. EEEPC assisted NYSDEC and NYSDOH with two public-availability sessions in the Greenpoint area designed to inform homeowners of the specifics of the vapor intrusion sampling program and to answer their questions. The meetings were held on December 13, 2006, at the auditorium of St. Cecelia s church on North Henry Street. EEEPC reserved the meeting location, prepared basic presentation materials regarding soil vapor intrusion and sampling, and had four representatives attend the sessions to answer questions concerning the logistics of the sampling. A second database was developed to track and maintain contact with property owners and residents who volunteered for the sampling program. The database included addresses of property owners and residents who had returned 02:002699_ID18_04-B R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07
12 2. Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling forms to NYSDEC indicating they wanted to be included in the program, dates that EEEPC contacted the owners by phone to schedule appointments for sampling, and the scheduled sampling dates. Periodically, a report was generated from this database and sent to NYSDEC to provide the addresses that had been scheduled. NYSDEC sent multiple teams of people to Greenpoint to go door-to-door to ask residents whether they were interested in volunteering for the sampling program. The NYSDEC teams were in Greenpoint during the week of January 22 and 29, On two of the days, EEEPC representatives assisted NYSDEC with this work. In January 2007, EEEPC developed another mailing to property owners that had not responded to the initial mailings of November 29, 2006, and January 17, This mailing, sent via certified mail with return receipts requested, was sent to 337 addresses on January 26, A total of 72 property owners returned a signed access agreement form to NYSDEC, with 66 volunteering their residences for sampling and 6 residents declining. Of the 66 positive responses, 53 houses were scheduled for soil vapor intrusion sampling. Thirteen residences were not able to be sampled because of either a lack of response to phone calls to attempt to schedule a sampling date or a late response declining sampling before the end of the heating season. Two residents on Apollo Street who had volunteered lived in the same building. Therefore, sampling was conducted at 52 residences. 2.3 Pre-sampling Inspection A building inspection and product inventory was conducted at each structure to be sampled before initiating sampling in order to identify conditions that may have affected or interfered with the proposed testing. The building inspection work involved interviewing the building owner or tenant regarding the construction of the building (type of structure, floor layout, materials used, etc.), physical condition of the building (age of heating system, cracks/holes in basement floors, fire damage, etc.), and characteristics of people living in the building (number, ages, number of smokers, etc.). The product inventory was designed to identify potential air sampling interference by characterizing the type and use of chemicals and products containing volatile organic compounds (VOCs), keeping in mind the goal of the investigation and site-specific contaminants of concern. Household and construction products potentially containing VOCs on the air sampling analyte list were recorded, and a parts per billion (ppb) photoionization detector (PID) was used to screen product storage and other areas of the building for potentially significant sources of VOCs. The pre-sampling inspection and product inventory work was conducted one day before placement of the sampling canisters, whenever possible, to allow for the removal of any products or chemicals identified that could have affected evaluation of the analytical data. In all cases, sampling did 02:002699_ID18_04-B R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07
13 2. Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling not have to be delayed, but some sample locations were altered as deemed necessary because of certain chemicals and activities (see Table 2-1). The building inspections and product inventories were recorded on NYSDOH Center for Environmental Health Indoor Air Quality Questionnaire and Building Inventory forms (New York State Department of Health October 2006) (with modifications by EEEPC to incorporate additional information). Photographs of sample locations were collected whenever possible. Sample Indoor Air Quality Questionnaire and Building Inventory and field sample collection forms are provided in Appendix B of this report. 2.4 Sampling Procedures All sub-slab vapor and ambient air samples were collected in specially prepared, evacuated stainless-steel canisters provided by the laboratory. The canisters were prepared in accordance with analytical method TO-15 (United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] January 1999). All samples were collected in 6-liter Summa canisters. All sample collection times were approximately 24 hours, and regulators were provided by the laboratory to maintain flow for the 24- hour collection period at approximately 4 milliliters (ml) per minute. The regulators were designed to maintain a consistent differential vacuum pressure and flow rate throughout the sampling period. The laboratory also provided pressure gauges with regulators to check that appropriate vacuums existed at the start of the sampling and at the time of sample collection. All canisters were individually certified clean by the laboratory prior to use. Vapor intrusion air samples were assigned an ID according to the convention in which a two- or three-letter code identifies the site: GP was used to identify the Greenpoint area. The letter code is followed by a sequential number that identifies all samples from a single structure. For example, the first Greenpoint structure sampled was GP-001, GP-002 was used for the second structure sampled, and so on. Sub-codes were used to identify the type of sample collected at each structure. SS stands for sub-slab vapor samples; BA for indoor air, basement samples; FA for indoor air, first floor samples; and OA for outdoor air samples Sub-slab Vapor A total of 53 sub-slab vapor samples were collected at 52 different structures (not including quality control [QC] samples) (see Table 2-1). Before each sample was prepared, a visual assessment of the condition of the floor was conducted. Whenever possible, the sample was generally located near the middle of the basement in an area that was out of the line of traffic and away from major cracks and other floor penetrations (e.g., sumps and pipes). Sample preparation began by drilling a 1-inch diameter hole approximately ½ inch into the floor to provide a shoulder for creating a seal. Next, a ½-inch diameter hole was drilled the remainder of the way through the concrete floor slab. Concrete dust generated during drilling was swept away from the drill hole to prevent 02:002699_ID18_04-B R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07
14 2. Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling it from falling into the hole but was not vacuumed to avoid potentially pulling sub-slab vapors into the building. Teflon-lined polyethylene tubing was inserted into the hole and was placed no farther than 2 inches below the bottom of the floor slab. Granular bentonite was mixed with water to a puttylike consistency, then placed around the tubing at the floor penetration and packed tightly around the tubing. An additional seal of thin polyethylene was then placed over the bentonite seal and around the tubing. A low-flow vacuum pump or a syringe was then used to withdraw at least three volumes of the sample tubing into a Tedlar bag that was removed from the structure to prevent potential cross-contamination. Before discharging the bag outside, the organic vapor concentration of the purged air was measured using a PID. The tubing was then connected to the flow control valve/pressure gauge assembly and this was attached to a pre-cleaned and pre-evacuated sample canister (i.e., 6- liter Summa canister). The sample canister and regulator numbers and starting gauge pressure were recorded for each location. Each sample was assigned a sample identification number that was written on the canister ID tag, chain-ofcustody (COC) form, and field data collection form. Whenever possible, a photograph of the sample location was taken immediately after the sample canister was deployed to verify that the canister was not disturbed during sample collection. One sub-slab sample canister was identified as having been disturbed by the EEEPC sample teams (GP-001-SS), with a replacement sub-slab sample deployed at the time that disturbance of the initial sample was identified. After the sample collection period of approximately 24 hours elapsed, the final gauge pressure was recorded, the flow control valve was closed, the regulator/gauge assembly was removed, and the labeled sample canister was placed back into the original shipping box. The sample tubing and bentonite were removed and the hole was filled with hydraulic cement. After completing sampling, the canisters were shipped to the laboratory for analysis Ambient Air sampling Ambient air samples collected during the course of the study included basement air, first-floor air, and outdoor air. A total of 64 basement air samples, 37 firstfloor air samples, and 51 outdoor air samples were collected (not including QC samples) from the 52 structures sampled (see Table 2-1). The sample canisters for all ambient air samples were placed on a stable surface approximately 3 feet above the floor or ground surface. The basement air samples were generally located near the sub-slab sample location in the center of the basement. First-floor samples were located in frequently used rooms (i.e., primarily living rooms, dining rooms, and kitchens) but in a low-traffic area to prevent any disturbance by the homeowner or tenant. Outdoor air samples were placed off the ground and away from high automobile traffic (back or side yards) whenever possible. No specific sources of emissions were identified by field personnel during the outdoor ambient air sample collection. 02:002699_ID18_04-B R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07
15 2. Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling All basement, first-floor, and outdoor ambient air samples were set up similarly. The flow control valve/pressure gauge assembly was attached to a pre-cleaned and pre-evacuated sample canister (6-liter Summa canister) and the valve was opened. The sample canister and regulator numbers and starting gauge pressure were recorded for each location. Each sample was assigned a sample identification number that was written on the canister ID tag, COC form, and field data collection form. Whenever possible, a photograph of the sample location was taken immediately after the sample canister was deployed to verify that the canister was not disturbed during collection. One first-floor sample canister was identified by the EEEPC sampling team as having been disturbed (GP-025-FA); however, with NYSDEC s concurrence, a replacement sample was not deployed because a basement air sample was also collected, and this is the primary indoor air sample used by NYSDOH to evaluate exposure concerns. After the sample collection period of 24 hours elapsed, the final gauge pressure was recorded, the flow control valve was closed, the regulator/gauge assembly was removed, and the labeled sample canister was placed back into the original shipping box. After completing sampling, the canisters were shipped to the laboratory for analysis Quality Control Field QC samples included 12 duplicates, which can be identified with the letter D following the sub-code in the sample ID. Duplicate samples provide insight as to the homogeneity of the sample matrix and establish a degree of confidence that the sample represents site conditions. Field duplicates were collected at the rate of 1 duplicate per 20 original samples (5%). Ambient air duplicates were collected from only basement and first-floor sample locations, with two canisters set up adjacent to one another. A review of the duplicate sample results is provided in the Data Usability Summary Reports (DUSRs) in Appendix D. There were no impacts on data usability associated with the field duplicate sample results. 2.5 Sample Analysis Analysis was performed using USEPA Method TO-15 (Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds [VOCs] in Air Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry [GC/MS]) for VOCs and modified ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) method D for methane. There is no target compound list for Method TO-15; therefore, a list of 78 compounds was selected by NYSDEC and NYSDOH. The analyte list includes chlorinated VOCs as well as petroleum and fuel-related products. All analytes in all sample types analyzed using method TO-15 were reported in micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m 3 ) with the exception of undecane, dodecane, and tert-butyl alcohol, which was reported only in parts per billion by volume (ppbv). Methane results were reported in parts per million by volume (ppmv). Sample analyses were conducted by Air Toxics, Ltd. of Folsom, California. Air Toxics, Ltd. is certified by the NYSDOH Environmental Laboratory Approval Program 02:002699_ID18_04-B R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07
16 2. Soil Vapor Intrusion Sampling (ELAP) for environmental analyses of air and emissions. Original laboratory reports (data validation qualifiers are applied) are provided in Appendix C. 2.6 Data Validation All laboratory deliverables were reviewed in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) (EEEPC January 2007) and appropriate air method and general reporting requirements from NYSDEC s Analytical Services Protocol (ASP) (June 2000). The data were qualified following general guidelines in the USEPA s Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review, EPA 540/R (USEPA October 1999). DUSRs were prepared for each laboratory report (based on sample delivery group) as specified in NYSDEC s Guidance for the Development of Quality Assurance Plans and Data Usability Summary Reports (July 1999). The data review included an evaluation of the following: Holding times; Initial and continuing calibration; Reporting limits; Laboratory blanks; Laboratory control samples; Field duplicates; Sample result verification; and Method-specific QC samples (e.g., GC/MS tunes). DUSRs were prepared for the Air Toxics, Inc. laboratory reports by EEEPC s project chemist. All DUSRs were reviewed by EEEPC s Quality Assurance Director. DUSRs for the Air Toxics, Inc. laboratory reports are provided in Appendix C. Any deviations from acceptable QC specifications are discussed in the DUSRs. Qualifiers were added to the data, when appropriate, to indicate potential concerns with data usability, and these qualifiers were transferred to the data summary tables in Section 3. Air Toxics, Inc. laboratory reports submitted as part of this task were electronically reviewed by EEEPC s project chemist using the USEPA s Automated Data Review (ADR) program. As data were being validated, preliminary results were submitted to NYSDEC and NYSDOH for assessment. 02:002699_ID18_04-B R_Soil Vapor Intrusion-Greenpoint - Final.doc-07/10/07
17 Table 2-1 Soil Vapor Intrusion Investigation Sample Collection Summary, 2006/2007 Heating Season, Greenpoint Area, Brooklyn, New York Sample Sample Type (w/centek) Location ID Collection Date Sub-Slab Basement Air First Floor Air Outdoor Air Duplicate GP /13/2006 and SS/BA 12/14/2006 GP /14/ GP /13/ GP-004 1/24/ GP-005 1/11/ GP-006 1/11/ GP-007 1/10/ GP-008 1/7/ FA GP-009 1/11/ BA GP-010 1/11/ GP-011 1/12/ BA GP-012 1/24/ GP-013 1/24/ GP-014 1/25/ BA GP-015 1/25/ GP-016 1/25/ BA GP-017 2/7/ BA GP-018 2/7/ GP-019 2/7/ BA GP-020 2/21/ GP-021 2/21/ BA GP-022 2/21/ GP-023 2/22/ GP-024 2/22/ GP-025 2/28/ GP-026 2/28/ GP-027 2/28/ GP-028 2/28/ BA GP-029 3/1/ GP-030 3/1/ FA GP-031 3/7/ BA GP-032 3/7/ GP-033 3/7/ GP-034 3/7/ FA GP-035 3/8/ GP-036 3/8/ GP-037 3/8/ GP-038 3/8/ GP-039 3/8/ GP-040 3/9/ GP-041 3/21/ GP-042 3/27/ GP-043 3/20/ BA GP-044 3/21/ SS GP-045 3/15/ GP-046 3/21/ GP-047 3/21/ BA GP-048 3/21/ GP-049 3/21/ GP-050 3/21/ GP-051 3/21/ GP-052 3/21/ :002699_ID18_04-B2235 Table 2-1 Draft Public Sample Collection Summary.xls-Public Report 2-1-7/10/2007 Source: Ecology and Environment Engineering, P.C. 2006
18 Ecology & Environment, Inc. GIS Department Project # \\BUFSDL4\GIS\Buffalo\Apollo\Maps\MXD\\GreenPoint\Public_IndoorAirReport_May2007\GreenPoint_IndoorAirSampleLocation_Map_Public_with_Plume.mxd CANADA New York Site Location k TR-SY Patricks Cathedral TR-SY Patricks Cathedral Greenpoint Ave N E W T OW N C RE E K King sla nd McGorrick Park McGorrick Park GP-017 GP-041!(!(!( GP-032 GP-028!(!(!( GP-001 GP-030 GP-045!( GP-005!(!( GP-010!( GP-051 GP-013 GP-003 GP-047!(!(!(!( GP-037 GP-034!( GP-044!( GP-007 GP-009!(!( GP-023!(!(!( GP-018 GP-027!(!(!( GP-043 GP-042 GP-011!(!( GP-031 GP-046 GP-052!( GP-048 GP-038!( GP-049 GP-036!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( GP-015 GP-039 GP-029 GP-050!(!( GP-012!( GP-040 GP-006 GP-021 GP-020!( GP-019!( GP-033!( GP-026 GP-022!(!(!(!(!( GP-024!( GP-025 GP-014!( GP-035 GP-008!( GP-016!(!( GP-002 GP-004 Brooklyn Queens Expressway Recreation Area Recreation Area!( Vapor Intrusion Sampling Location Transportation Line Buildings Open Space Approximate Plume Location (Based on Information compiled from ExxonMobil April 2006 Quarterly Progress Report and SAIC 2007 Supplemental Site Characterization Report) Greenpoint Residential VI Study Area ,000 Feet Meters Figure 2-1 Greenpoint Vapor Intrusion Sample Location Map Greenpoint Brooklyn, New York December '06 through March '07
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
Vapor Intrusion in New York City Greenpoint: The Tip of the Iceberg
Vapor Intrusion in New York City Greenpoint: The Tip of the Iceberg Lenny Siegel February 2009 For years New York State s environmental agencies have been conducting highprofile vapor intrusion responses
More informationVapor Intrusion Pathway: A Practical Guideline
Vapor Intrusion Pathway: A Practical Guideline John Boyer New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection November 2009 2 ITRC Shaping the Future of Regulatory Acceptance Host organization Network State regulators
More informationSOIL AND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN For Site Located at 420 South Avenue Rochester, New York NYSDEC Spill No. 1000563 PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:
SOIL AND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN For Site Located at 420 South Avenue Rochester, New York NYSDEC Spill No. 1000563 PREPARED FOR: FLOWER CITY MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT THE MEDICAL ARTS BUILDING (USGBC
More informationStreet Address (number and street): City: County: ZIP Code: B. CURRENT SITE PRIORITY INFORMATION Was free product present this quarter?
QUARTERLY MONITORING REPORT (QMR) COVER SHEET AND REPORT FORMAT State Form 56087 (6-16) 329 IAC 9-5 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Land Quality Leaking Underground Storage Tank
More informationPresented by: Craig Puerta, PE, MBA December 12, 2012
Presented by: Craig Puerta, PE, MBA December 12, 2012 Established in 2010 under charter from New York State to transfer lower priority sites from State s program. First municipally-run brownfield cleanup
More informationINFO TECH: ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
INFO TECH: ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS A Summary of Environmental Concerns Regarding Contamination at Information Technology High School (Q502) 21-16 44 Road, Long Island City Queens, New York 11101 Lenny Siegel
More informationA Comparison between EPA Compendium Method TO- 15 and EPA Method 8260B for VOC Determination in Soil Gas
A Comparison between EPA Compendium Method TO- 15 and EPA Method 8260B for VOC Determination in Soil Gas Paper #46 Heidi C. Hayes Air Toxics, Ltd., 180 Blue Ravine Rd. Ste. B, Folsom, CA 95630 Diane J.
More informationRisk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup
July 2013 Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has adopted a risk based decision making process to provide a framework for determining cleanup
More informationNew Cumberland Army Depot Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS) Marsh Run Park Site Restoration Community Meeting
New Cumberland Army Depot Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS) Marsh Run Park Site Restoration Community Meeting Fairview Township, York County, Pennsylvania April 23, 2013 N US Army Corps of Engineers Depot
More informationAdvancing the State of Analytical Science. for air, water and soil analysis. and beyond
Advancing the State of Analytical Science for air, water and soil analysis and beyond Full Spectrum of Services SEMICONDUCTOR SECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRY HIGH TECHNOLOGY R&D Process Analysis Substrate,
More informationNEWTOWN CREEK/GREENPOINT OIL SPILL STUDY BROOKLYN, NEW YORK. September 12, 2007
NEWTOWN CREEK/GREENPOINT OIL SPILL STUDY BROOKLYN, NEW YORK September 12, 2007 Table of Contents Executive Summary: Section 1: Introduction.........1 Legislative History......1 Area Characterization and
More informationUnderground Storage Tanks
Underground Storage Tanks An Informational and Guidance Document for the University Community. Please contact Yale Environmental Health and Safety for latest Regulatory Requirements. A typical UST installation
More informationSan Mateo County Environmental Health Characterization and Reuse of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil
INTRODUCTION San Mateo County Environmental Health Characterization and Reuse of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil This guidance relates to the on-site reuse of non-hazardous petroleum hydrocarbon impacted
More informationOGS LIMITED ASBESTOS & LEAD SURVEY REPORT
our people and our passion in every project OGS LIMITED ASBESTOS & LEAD SURVEY REPORT Building 44 Willard Drug Treatment Center 7116 County Road 132 Willard, NY Prepared for: NYSOGS 33 rd Floor, Corning
More informationApplication for the Construction or Installation of Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) Systems or Associated Underground or Over-water Piping Systems
Page 1 of 5 Application for the Construction or Installation of Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) Systems or Associated Underground or Over-water Piping Systems New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services
More informationTechnical Guidance Manual for the Implementation of the Hawai`i State Contingency Plan. Interim Final SECTION 10
Technical Guidance Manual for the Implementation of the Hawai`i State Contingency Plan SECTION 10 DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) Hawai`i HEER TGM 10-1 December 31, 2008 CONTENTS Acronyms
More informationMitigating Vapors at the Atlantic Highlands Elementary School, New Jersey. Lenny Siegel Center for Public Environmental Oversight October, 2009
Mitigating Vapors at the Atlantic Highlands Elementary School, New Jersey Lenny Siegel Center for Public Environmental Oversight October, 2009 On Columbus Day, 2009 I visited the Atlantic Highlands Elementary
More informationVAPOR INTRUSION SCREENING LEVEL (VISL) CALCULATOR USER S GUIDE
VAPOR INTRUSION SCREENING LEVEL (VISL) CALCULATOR USER S GUIDE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE OFFICE OF SUPERFUND REMEDIATION AND TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION
More informationWATER SUPPLY WELL RECEPTOR SURVEY GUIDANCE DOCUMENT
STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION WATER SUPPLY WELL RECEPTOR SURVEY GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Bureau of Water Protection and Land Reuse Remediation Division September 2009
More informationWhat Constitutes Environmental Due Diligence?
What Constitutes Environmental Due Diligence? Different Levels of Due Diligence for Different Types of Acquisitions: Green Fields, Brownfields, Operating Terminals and Leases By Gail A. Corrigan, Corrigan
More informationAPPENDIX N. Data Validation Using Data Descriptors
APPENDIX N Data Validation Using Data Descriptors Data validation is often defined by six data descriptors: 1) reports to decision maker 2) documentation 3) data sources 4) analytical method and detection
More informationOperations, Maintenance and Monitoring Plan Halesite Former MGP Site
(,(liil hoi,ii I flyiiilililllll1 Ii.IIIJ \X'\l1 r I~l'!lut, I IIglllttllll" Operations, Maintenance and Monitoring Plan Halesite Former MGP Site Halesite, Suffolk County, N ew York AOC Index No. Dl-0001-98-11
More informationPCE, TCE, and TCA Vapors in Subslab Soil Gas and Indoor Air: A Case Study in Upstate New York
PCE, TCE, and TCA Vapors in Subslab Soil Gas and Indoor Air: A Case Study in Upstate New York by Gerald J. McDonald and William E. Wertz Abstract A comprehensive investigation of subsurface vapor intrusion
More informationSite Assessment for the Proposed Coke Point Dredged Material Containment Facility at Sparrows Point
Site Assessment for the Proposed Coke Point Dredged Material Containment Facility at Sparrows Point Prepared for Maryland Port Administration 2310 Broening Highway Baltimore, MD 21224 (410) 631-1022 Maryland
More informationImproper storage of fuel on construction sites will increase the risk of water pollution that may occur as a result of leaks or spills.
WQ-10 Best Management Practice (BMP) Water Quality Protection Guideline Secondary Containment Design Standards Fuel Storage on Construction Sites According to the EPA, the majority of water pollution in
More informationALLEGANY WIND POWER PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SPILL PREVENTION PLAN
ALLEGANY WIND POWER PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SPILL PREVENTION PLAN Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be implemented during construction of the Allegany Wind Power Project to prevent and contain spills.
More informationSTATEMENT OF BASIS HYPERGOL SUPPORT BUILDING SWMU 65 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION KENNEDY SPACE CENTER BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
STATEMENT OF BASIS HYPERGOL SUPPORT BUILDING SWMU 65 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION KENNEDY SPACE CENTER BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA PURPOSE OF STATEMENT OF BASIS This Statement of Basis (SB)
More informationALL UST SYSTEMS. MOTOR FUEL, USED OIL, BULK HEATING OIL STORAGE (Federal/State Regulated Systems)
FACTS ABOUT: UST SYSTEMS COMPLIANCE OUTLINE Maryland Department of the Environment In Maryland, certain UST systems must meet various compliance requirements. The following is a summary of the current
More informationUlf Lindmark Litigation Support Experience
Case No. 1 Retained by attorneys for defendant (furniture manufacturer) in case against the property owner, who sought damages for soil and groundwater contamination beneath the property. Case No. 2 Retained
More informationGuide to the Remediation Report & Fee Submission Form
Guide to the Remediation Report & Fee Submission Form May 1, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 DEFINITIONS... 1 2 INTRODUCTION... 3 3 BACKGROUND... 3 3.1 EXISTING POLICY/GUIDELINES FRAMEWORK... 3 Domestic Fuel
More informationMARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore Maryland 21230-1719 1-800-633-6101 http://www.mde.state.md.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore Maryland 21230-1719 1-800-633-6101 http://www.mde.state.md.us Colonial Pipeline Dorsey Junction Facility 929 Hood s Mill Road,
More informationSOIL GAS MODELLING SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS USING DIMENSIONLESS PARAMETERS FOR J&E EQUATION
1 SOIL GAS MODELLING SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS USING DIMENSIONLESS PARAMETERS FOR J&E EQUATION Introduction Chris Bailey, Tonkin & Taylor Ltd, PO Box 5271, Wellesley Street, Auckland 1036 Phone (64-9)355-6005
More informationBP Texas City Refinery
BP Texas City Refinery ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FOR YEAR 2010 (Review of Y2009 Performance) Introduction Recognizing the complex nature of petroleum refining operations and to ensure that we meet our stated
More informationSite Description and History
3130 Southwest 17 th Street Pembroke Park, Florida County: Broward District: Southeast Site Lead: EPA Placed on National Priorities List: July 22, 1987 HWC # 023 Site Description and History The Petroleum
More informationPCB SPIU CLEANUP CAUSE AND EFFECT DIAGRAM. Bruce A. Bohnen Technical Director Integrated Chemistries, Incorporated 1970 Oakcrest Avenue, Suite 215
CHEMICAL SPILL CLEANUP TECHNOLOGY Bruce A. Bohnen Technical Director Integrated Chemistries, Incorporated 1970 Oakcrest Avenue, Suite 215 St. Paul, MN 55113 Building structures occasionally are contaminated
More informationG-704-0 SPECIFICATION: GAS METER AND REGULATOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. 3 and Gas Yellow Book. REVISIONS: (See ) 1/15/14 5 Years
LAST REVIEW DATE: REVIEW CYCLE: 1/15/14 5 Years SPECIFICATION: TITLE: VOLUME: G-704-0 3 and Gas Yellow Book REVISIONS: (See ) 1) This specification is being issued for the first time. G-704-0 Gas Operations
More informationSTATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT - 008
STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT - 008 Effective Date - January 13, 1992 Revised Date - November 19, 1993
More informationOPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE (O&M) FOR PROPANE STORAGE FACILITIES
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE (O&M) FOR PROPANE STORAGE FACILITIES Reference: National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Pamphlet No. 58 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code, 2001, Chapter 11 Type of Facility: Petroleum
More informationRutgers Environmental Health and Safety
Rutgers Environmental Health and Safety PCB Self-Audit (TSCA Program) Facility Name: Rutgers University, Facility Address: Facility EPA Identification Number: Date of Self-Audit Inspection: Campus/Farm/Field
More informationRevised April (May) 2015
Section 19.0 Cross Connection Control Policy 19.1 Responsibility 19.1.1 The Elkhart Water Utility has the responsibility to supply safe, potable water from the source to the point of delivery defined as
More informationRCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator (EI) RCRIS code (CA750) Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control
Page 1 DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR DETERMINATION RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator (EI) RCRIS code () Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control Facility Name: Veolia
More informationBEST PRACTICES IN LEAK DETECTION AND REPAIR (LDAR) PROGRAMS. November 06, 2014 By: François Thibodeau, Eng.
BEST PRACTICES IN LEAK DETECTION AND REPAIR (LDAR) PROGRAMS November 06, 2014 By: François Thibodeau, Eng. 2 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW 1. Essential Components of a LDAR Program 2. LDAR Best Practices a. A
More information5.2 Transportation And Marketing Of Petroleum Liquids 1-3. 5.2.1 General
5.2 Transportation And Marketing Of Petroleum Liquids 1-3 5.2.1 General The transportation and marketing of petroleum liquids involve many distinct operations, each of which represents a potential source
More informationCHAPTER 4 WELL COMPLETION AND MAINTENANCE
CHAPTER 4 WELL COMPLETION AND MAINTENANCE Section 1: Disinfection. (a) Each person who repairs, modifies, works on, or otherwise affects the physical components of a well shall clean and disinfect the
More informationMITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Accompanies the Van Nuys Fire Station 39 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration)
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (Accompanies the Van Nuys Fire Station 39 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration) Van Nuys Fire Station 39 W.O. E170094B The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
More informationCONTAMINANT SOURCES. JUNE 1998 Printed on recycled paper
Rural Wellhead Protection Protection Fact Sheet Fact Sheet CONTAMINANT SOURCES JUNE 1998 Printed on recycled paper INTRODUCTION More than 75 percent of Wyoming s population relies on groundwater for part
More informationU. S. Army Corps of Engineers Ground Water Extraction System Subsurface Performance Checklist
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Ground Water Extraction System Subsurface Performance Checklist Installation Name Site Name / I.D. Evaluation Team Site Visit Date This checklist is meant to aid in evaluating
More informationFINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION
FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION 1000 FRENCH STREET SITE Wilmington, Delaware DE 1115 June 1999 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Division of Air and Waste Management Site Investigation
More informationBLUE ISLAND NORTHEAST MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL PARK 119TH STREET & VINCENNES AVENUE BLUE ISLAND, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
DRAFT ANALYSIS OF BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES BLUE ISLAND NORTHEAST MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL PARK 119TH STREET & VINCENNES AVENUE BLUE ISLAND, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS PREPARED BY: Office of Sustainability
More informationNOTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR GASOLINE DISPENSING FACILITIES (GDFs) NESHAP 40 CFR, Part 63, Subpart CCCCCC (Sections 63.11110 63.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (DEQ), OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE NOTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR GASOLINE DISPENSING FACILITIES (GDFs) NESHAP 40 CFR, Part 63, Subpart CCCCCC
More informationASME B31.3 Process Piping. Scope of B31.3 Course
ASME B31.3 Process Piping Charles Becht IV, PhD, PE Don Frikken, PE Instructors BECHT ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. Introduction -1 Scope of B31.3 Course This course covers piping as typically used in process
More informationCitgo Service Station (Former Gulf Oil/Chevron) 14226 Jarrettsville Pike Baltimore County Jacksonville, Maryland Open Case No.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Suite 620 Baltimore, Maryland 21230-1719 410-537-3442 800-633-6101 x 3442 www.mde.state.md.us Land Management Administration Oil Control
More informationWork Type Definition
Work Type Definition Page 1-6 details the work type definition. In order to become pre-qualified for this work type, please see the Work Type Submittal Requirements on pages 7-8. I. Description A. Work
More informationIAC 7/2/08 Agriculture and Land Stewardship[21] Ch 44, p.1
IAC 7/2/08 Agriculture and Land Stewardship[21] Ch 44, p.1 CHAPTER 44 ON-SITE CONTAINMENT OF PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND SOIL CONDITIONERS [Prior to 7/27/88, see 21 Ch 9] PESTICIDES 21 44.1(206) Definitions.
More informationOil Spill Clean-up by Homeowner in Ohio *
Oil Spill Clean-up by Homeowner in Ohio * HALLWAY WITH OIL TANK AND ENCLOSURE (NOVEMBER 2005) This picture is taken before we purchased the property. The house is built on a slab foundation. There was
More informationRisk Assessment Based Environmental Management Systems for Petroleum Retail Stores
Risk Assessment Based Environmental Management Systems for Petroleum Retail Stores NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Prevention and Remediation In Selected Industrial Sectors: Small Sites in Urban Areas Prof. Cem
More informationRULE 8-8 - ORGANIC COMPOUNDS - WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND SEPARATION SYSTEMS
BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RULE 8-8 - ORGANIC COMPOUNDS - WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND SEPARATION SYSTEMS (ADOPTED: January 17, 1979) (AMENDED: November 1, 1989; October 6, 1993; June 15, 1994;
More informationQUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BROWNFIELDS/VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM SITES
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR BROWNFIELDS/VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM SITES Prepared by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources Division of Environmental Quality Hazardous Waste Program Brownfields/Voluntary
More informationInstructions to Remedial Party / Remedial Party Consultant
Site Management Plan Template Instructions to NYSDEC Project Manager The NYSDEC Project Manager may delete or indicate as Not Applicable sections of this template that do not apply to a specific site before
More informationNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Remediation Management Response Site Remediation Program
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Remediation Management Response Site Remediation Program NJDEP- SRP Low Level USEPA TO-15 Method (NJDEP-LLTO-15-3/2007) March 2007 March 2009
More informationAPPENDIX 7-B SUGGESTED OUTLINE OF A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN
APPENDIX 7-B SUGGESTED OUTLINE OF A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN This outline is recommended for use by UST consultants/contractors in preparing a generic Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for use
More informationEnvironmental Health & Safety
Environmental Health & Safety Title: Oil Spill Notification, Reporting, and Response Effective Date: 04/01/2008 Document #: PBS-007-001.JPB Revision Date: Rev. 0 I. Purpose of the Policy: To ensure Oil
More informationCITY OF PINOLE SEWER LATERAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES
CITY OF PINOLE SEWER LATERAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES Adopted by Resolution No. 2012-132 Dated December 18, 2012 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE... 3 I. WHEN INSPECTION IS REQUIRED (PMC 13.20.050, 13.20.060,
More informationCHAPTER 62-740 PETROLEUM CONTACT WATER
CHAPTER 62-740 PETROLEUM CONTACT WATER 62-740.010 Declaration of Intent (Repealed) 62-740.020 Applicability 62-740.030 Definitions 62-740.040 General 62-740.100 Management Practices for Producers of PCW
More informationStraight Talk On Tanks Leak Detection Methods For Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks And Piping
Straight Talk On Tanks Leak Detection Methods For Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks And Piping Printed on Recycled Paper Contents Do You Have Questions About Leak Detection?...1 An Overview Of Leak Detection
More informationENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS FOR PETROLEUM OIL REFINERIES EMISSIONS. Standards for emissions from furnaces, boilers and Power Plant
ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS FOR PETROLEUM OIL REFINERIES EMISSIONS Standards for emissions from furnaces, boilers and Power Plant S. Parameter Limiting concentration in mg/nm 3, unless stated Existing refineries
More informationV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. Hazardous Materials
E. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS An Environmental Site Assessment Phase I Update was performed on the subject properties by California Environmental Inc. in March 2000 1. This report is included in Appendix E of
More informationAPPENDIX G Materials Storage and Handling Guidelines
APPENDIX G Materials Storage and Handling Guidelines 1.0 INTRODUCTION Operations at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (ABIA) comprise several different industrial activities including aircraft, ground
More informationThe following definitions apply with regard to requirements specified in this document:
GUIDELINES FOR INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT ABOVEGROUND DIESEL FUEL TANKS FOR EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER SYSTEMS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF BUILDINGS For Use by Unidocs Member Agencies or where approved
More informationAsbestos Storage Facility Plan Examples
Asbestos Storage Facility Plan Examples The purpose of this document This document contains examples of what an operational plan, plans and specification, contingency plan and closure plan should look
More informationUtilizing an Innovative, Effective Site Assessment and Monitoring Tool
Utilizing an Innovative, Effective Site Assessment and Monitoring Tool Jay W. Hodny, Ph.D. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Elkton, MD, USA Laurie LaPlante, P.E. Kleinfelder, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA
More informationSpecification. Indoor Air Quality Management
GREENGUARD Environmental Institute 2211 Newmarket Parkway, Suite 110 Marietta, GA 30067 1.800.427.9681 Specification Indoor Air Quality Management This Master Specification section is intended for use
More informationDraft ABCA : USEPA 2015 Brownfields Cleanup Grant Application for Former Hudepohl Brewery Site by Port of Greater Cincinnati Development Authority
Analysis of Brownfield Cleanup Alternatives (ABCA) for Hudepohl Brewery Site Introduction & History The Port of Greater Cincinnati Development Authority (Port Authority) has developed a draft proposal
More information4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH 2008 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT YUCCA VALLEY RETAIL SPECIFIC PLAN The State defines hazardous material as any material that, because of its quantity, concentration, or
More information(Adopted July 7, 1989)(Amended December 7, 1990) (Amended May 13, 1994) FUGITIVE EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
(Adopted July 7, 1989)(Amended December 7, 1990) (Amended May 13, 1994) RULE 1173. FUGITIVE EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (a) (b) Purpose This rule is intended to control volatile organic compounds
More informationA GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PLAN FOR HOME HEATING OIL TANKS
A GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PLAN FOR HOME HEATING OIL TANKS What is a groundwater protection plan? A groundwater protection plan identifies the activities being conducted that can pollute groundwater and
More informationSPILL CONTAINMENT AND CONTROL PLAN
SPILL CONTAINMENT AND CONTROL PLAN PUD NO. 1 TREATMENT PLANT 1257 GLASS ROAD PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON PUD No. 1 Treatment Plant 2431 East Highway 101 P.O. Box 1090 Port Angeles, WA 98362 Facility Description:
More informationUNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM CLOSURE REPORT FORM
APPENDIX D COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP AND BROWNFIELDS UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM CLOSURE REPORT FORM - Facility I.D. Facility
More informationECHO System for Basements
ECHO System for Basements Homeowners looking for more space are all too familiar with the cold, damp and dingy basement. Now, the Enclosure Conditioned Housing (ECHO) System TM, winner of the Ottawa-Carleton
More informationE.2 Report of Methane Gas Assessment
E.2 Report of Methane Gas Assessment August 23, 2011 Via Electronic Mail Ms. Sharon Christenbury, Esq. SM 10000 Property, LLC 2200 Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33137 Re: Report of Methane Gas Assessment
More informationEcology Quality Assurance Glossary
Ecology Quality Assurance Glossary Edited by William Kammin, Ecology Quality Assurance Officer Accreditation - A certification process for laboratories, designed to evaluate and document a lab s ability
More informationNEVADA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NEVADA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ERIC ROOD ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 950 Maidu Avenue, Suite 170 Nevada City, California 95959-8617 Phone (530) 265-1222 HOME BUSINESS PERMIT
More informationPropane Gas Underground Systems: Residential Infrastructure Requirements and Energy Benefits
Propane Gas Underground Systems: Residential Infrastructure Requirements and Energy Benefits AIA Best Practices The Propane Education & Research Council and HanleyWood are registered providers with the
More informationAsbestos Inspection Project Procedure
EOSMS 402 Date: 01/13/2014 Page 1 of 6 1) Purpose This document is intended to specify the scope of services required of Asbestos Contractor in asbestos inspection projects at Kennesaw State University
More informationControl Device Requirements Charts For Oil and Gas Handling and Production Facilities
Device Charts For Oil and Gas Handling and Production Facilities Purpose/Scope: The purpose of this document is to provide standardized guidance for use by the regulated community and air permit reviewers,
More informationTHANK YOU. Realtors Protect Families From the Risk of Lung Cancer When Sellers Install Quality Radon Reduction Systems
Vapor Protection Services Partnering with Homeowners Call Us Now 317-252-5295 NOT ALL RADON SYSTEMS REDUCE RADON Contractors May Cut Corners on Safety Not All Installations Keep You Safe Radon 2nd Leading
More informationAppendix N Framework Spill Prevention, Containment, and Countermeasures Plan Prepared by: Idaho Power Company 1221 W Idaho Street Boise, ID 83702
Appendix N Framework Spill Prevention, Containment, and Countermeasures Plan Prepared by: Idaho Power Company 1221 W Idaho Street Boise, ID 83702 November 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE... 1 2.0 RESPONSIBILITY
More information9.1 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
9.0 RISK ASSESSMENT This Section of the HSCA Guidance describes the methods and procedures for performing a Human Health Risk Assessment (Section 9.1) and Ecological Risk Assessment (Section 9.2). 9.1
More informationSpill Control Prevention Plan (SCPP)
Spill Control Prevention Plan (SCPP) FACILITY INFORMATION PLEASE PRINT Facility Name: Mailing Address: Physical address if different: Owner Name: Owner Address: Primary Contact Name: Work Phone Number:
More informationWaste Handling & Disposal
Objectives Cover Contain Educate Reduce/Minimize Product Substitution Description Improper storage and handling of solid wastes can allow toxic compounds, oils and greases, heavy metals, nutrients, suspended
More information1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan
1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan The purpose of this section is to describe the quality assurance/quality control program that will be used during the system specific field testing
More informationHighway 23 Paynesville Richmond Soils Borings, Soils Tests, and Reporting
Highway 23 Paynesville Richmond Soils Borings, Soils Tests, and Reporting MnDOT Contract No. 1003249 General Project Overview This work is located along Trunk Highway (TH) 23, for State Project (SP) 7305-124.
More informationTwenty-eight premises environmental claim scenarios you may not have thought about.
Environmental DIVISION Twenty-eight premises claim scenarios you may not have thought about. Premises Environmental Liability Insurance Policy Great American Insurance Group s Premises Environmental Liability
More informationTemporary Batch Plants
Categories EC SE TC WE NS WM Erosion Control Sediment Control Tracking Control Wind Erosion Control Non-Stormwater Management Control Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control Legend: Primary Category
More informationMaryland Containment System Testing Protocol. The individual performing the inspection and testing as outlined in this protocol must be either:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Oil Control Program, Suite 620, 1800 Washington Blvd., Baltimore MD 21230-1719 4 410-537-3442 410-537-3092 (fax) 1-800-633-6101 http://www.mde.state.md.us Maryland
More informationMAGB HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP POLLUTION INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN
MAGB HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP POLLUTION INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN SCOPE: This guidance sets out best practice for producing a Pollution Incident Response Plan to deal with an environmental incident
More informationRULE 1102. DRY CLEANERS USING SOLVENT OTHER THAN PERCHLOROETHYLENE
(Adopted January 6, 1978)(Amended August 3, 1979)(Amended July 11, 1980) (Amended August 3, 1990)(Amended December 7, 1990) (Amended November 17, 2000) RULE 1102. DRY CLEANERS USING SOLVENT OTHER THAN
More informationENGINEERED DRAWINGS FOR PETROLEUM STORAGE TANKS
Facility Name: ENGINEERED DRAWINGS FOR PETROLEUM STORAGE TANKS The following is intended to be used as a guideline for information required to appear on engineered drawings involving petroleum storage
More informationNew York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY 12233 www.dec.ny.gov. Environmental Self Audit For Small Businesses
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY 12233 www.dec.ny.gov Environmental Self Audit For Small Businesses Disclaimer The materials in this document are intended
More informationDRY CLEANING PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENT QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN PART III: DRY CLEANING PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Revision 3 January 8, 2013 Kansas Department of Health and Environment Division of Environment
More information