Forecasting Sales for a Retail Firm: A Model and Some Evidence. Russell J. Lundholm Sarah E. McVay. University of Michigan


 Vincent Gilmore
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Forecasting Sales for a Retail Firm: A Model and Some Evidence By Russell J. Lundholm Sarah E. McVay University of Michigan October 2003 Note to seminar participants at the University of Waterloo: his paper is extremely preliminary. We are still collecting more data, still working on the model and still estimating more regressions. Please view this as a progress report rather than a completed paper. We welcome all your comments.
2 Introduction Every financial statement forecast begins with an estimate of future sales. ypically the sales estimate is then combined with a margin forecast to estimate future income and combined with a turnover forecast to estimate future assets. Although the sales forecast is the starting point for the entire financial statement forecasting exercise, there is surprisingly little published guidance on how one should go about making this estimate. he purpose of this paper is to present a reasonably general sales forecasting model and to demonstrate its use in the retail sector. he model distinguishes between sales growth that arises from growth in the asset base (e.g. opening new stores) and sales growth that arises from increased sales from existing assets (e.g. comparable store sales growth). he model also accounts for the predictable change in sales that will result as the asset base matures. Besides describing how sales are generated in a retail firm, we document that our model is a surprisingly accurate predictor of retail sales. We develop and estimate our model in the retail sector for a number of reasons. First, the underlying salesgenerating assets  the stores  are clearly identified for retail firms. Virtually every retail firm discloses the number of stores it operated during the year and many forecast the number of new stores they anticipate opening in the next year. Second, retail firms generally disclose the comparable store sales growth for the year, defined as the percentage growth in sales from stores that have been open for at least two full years. his gives us the two main pieces of the puzzle in our model the number of new salesgenerating units and the growth in sales from existing units. he question is how should these two drivers of future sales be woven together? Finally, we focus on the retail sector because it is arguably the most closely watched barometer of consumer spending. Since personal consumption expenditures make up about two thirds of the US Gross Domestic Product, sales in the retail sector are a barometer for the whole economy. 1
3 While our model is developed with a retail firm in mind, sales forecasts for many other types of firms will have a similar flavor. Forecasting sales growth at a pharmaceutical company involves forecasting the sales growth from existing drugs and the sales growth from introducing new drugs to the market. Forecasting the sales growth for a cruise line company involves forecasting increases in fares or passenger counts on existing ships and forecasting the revenues from newlylaunched ships. he retail industry offers us perhaps the best example of this type of problem because the salesgenerating units are clearly identified and relatively homogeneous. here is a growing financial statement analysis literature that examines how profit margins and asset turnover ratios evolve over time. Nissim and Penman (2001) and Fairfield and Yohn (2001) document reversion in these ratios to an economywide mean, and Soliman (2003) shows that an industry statistic is a more predictive mean reversion target. Penman and Zhang (2002) and Fairfield and Yohn (2001) also consider how past changes in these ratios predict future changes. Collectively these results characterize the future profitability and asset investment necessary for a given level of sales activity. But to use these results for valuation, or to forecast actual income flows or asset balances, the level of future sales activity must also be forecast. he only result related to predicting future sales is in Nissim and Penman (2001), who show that percentage sales growth tends to mean revert very quickly. Another related literature uses nonfinancial metrics to predict future earnings. Besides forecasting earnings rather than sales, these papers differ from our study in how closely related the nonfinancial measure is to the underlying salesgenerating asset. For example, Amir and Lev (1996) study the product market size and market penetration in the wireless industry; Chandra, Procassini and Waymire (1999) and Fargher, Gorman and and Wilkins (1998) study shipment data in the semiconductor industry; Rajgopal, Shevlin and Venkatachalam (2003) study order backlog, Ittner and Larcker (1998) study customer satisfaction measures and rueman, Wong and Zhang 2
4 (2000) study web traffic measures. None of these measures distinguish between changes in the financial performance due to changes in existing investments and changes due to new investment. 1 Our purpose is to present a reasonably general model for forecasting sales growth in the retail industry and to test the validity of various restrictions on the model that might lead to more parsimonious representations. We also illustrate the model s flexibility to adapt to different types of retail environments. For instance, the model can distinguish between retail firms who enjoy fad status, so that their new stores earn considerably more than their more mature stores (e.g. Whole Foods), and retail firms that take a long time to reach maturity, so that their new stores earn considerably less than their more mature stores (e.g. JC Penney). Our goal is also to develop a model that can be used to forecast sales growth for a typical retail firm in a typical year. One problem we must confront is the extreme limit on the number of observations in our regressions. he estimated salesgenerating rates are unique to each firm, ruling out crosssectional estimation, and the typical retail firm has only a limited time series of annual data. Consequently, we are forced to estimate our model on relatively little data the typical firm has only nine observations. For this reason we place heavy emphasis on developing a model with few estimated parameters. Despite this constraint, the median absolute residual error for the median firm is only 2.1% of sales. In contrast, using the estimated mean reversion in sales growth (as in Nissim and Penman 2001) results in an error that is 5% of sales. 2 We also discuss how to use our model for outofsample prediction and examine its outofsample forecast errors. A common voluntary disclosure for a retail firm is to estimate the number 1 In other related research, Nagar and Rajan (2001) examine the relation between a nonfinancial measure and future revenue. hey show that certain quality measures at 11 plants of the same company have predictive power for future revenue beyond past sales and other financial measures. Also, Francis, Schipper and Vincent (2003) show that comparable store sales in the restaurant industry are related to market prices. 2 Improving the sales forecast by just a few percent can have enormous consequences. As an example, if a firm had an expected constant ROE of 20%, a cost of equity capital of 10% and an expected perpetual growth rate of 5%, its markettobook ratio would be 3 (which is close to the current economy wide value). If the growth rate was raised to 6% the firm s value would increase 17%; if the growth rate was lowered to 4% the firm s value would decrease 11%. 3
5 of new stores it will open in the following fiscal year. Our model shows exactly how to incorporate this disclosure into a sales forecast. Unfortunately, firms rarely forecast their comparable store growth rate, so this must be estimated. We develop a simple model based on mean reversion in the firm s own comparable store growth rate and the advance monthly retail sales data provided by the US Census Bureau each month. Putting these two forecasts together with an estimate from our model, we generate outofsample forecasts that are almost as accurate as Valueline and IBES revenue forecasts. he Model Our model of sales for a retail firm requires that we distinguish between three classes of stores. he notation is as follows: #N t = number of new stores opened in year t (i.e. new stores) #M t = #N t1 = number of new stores opened in year t1 (i.e. mid stores) #D t = number of stores closed in year t (i.e. dead stores) #O t = number of stores open for at least 2 years and open in year t (i.e. old stores). his notation implies two equalities concerning the numbers of different types of stores: 1) #O t = total number of stores at year end  #N t  #M t and 2) #O t = #O t1 + #M t1  #D t. he average rate of sales in the fiscal year per store for each of the three classes of stores is denoted as NR t = the average sales/store rate for new stores in year t MR t = the average sales/store rate for the mid stores in year t OR t = the average sales/stores rate for the old stores in year t. With this, total sales in year t are given by Sales t = #O t OR t + #M t MR t + #N t NR t. (1) 4
6 Besides asserting that sales are generated by stores, (1) is a tautology because the salesgenerating rate from each of the three classes of stores can change each period. 3 Later we impose various restrictions on the salesgenerating rates that allow these rates to be estimated. he model uses three different classes of stores for a few different reasons. First, for most retail firms new stores generate sales at very different rates than old stores. Consumers may take some time to discover the new store and change their shopping habits, causing the new store sales to lag old store sales. Alternatively, the new store may blitz the market with advertisements and promotions, or may be a retailing fad, causing new store sales to exceed old store sales. And, most simply, the new stores are open only half of the fiscal year, on average, compared to the full year for old stores. he mid stores, which are last year s new stores, serve two purposes. First, as shown below, this category of store is necessary in order to precisely capture the notion of comparable store sales growth. Second, by comparing the estimated mid store rate to the estimated old and new store rates, we learn something about the speed with which the firm s stores reach maturity or, alternatively, enjoy a new store honeymoon period. he comparable store growth rate C t is the percentage increase in sales from stores that were open at the beginning of the prior fiscal year and are currently still open. Expressing this in terms of our model gives # OtOR t C t = 1. (2) (# O # D ) OR + # M MR t1 t t1 t1 t1 3 We could insert a constant term in (1) to capture sales that are not related to stores, such as internet sales. Later, however, we will estimate the differenced version of this equation so a constant would simply cancel out. 5
7 he numerator #O t OR t is the sales earned by the stores that have been open for two years, and are still open. he denominator is the sales these same stores earned a year earlier. o compute the sales from these stores in year t1, recall that #O t = #O t1 + #M t1  #D t and consider the sales that each of these types of stores generated in year t1. here were #O t1 old stores that were open a full year in t1, but #D t of these stores were closed in the current year; the net of these stores generated sales at the old rate of OR t1 in year t1. Note that this assumes that the stores closed in the current year come from the pool of old stores in year t1, and that they were closed at the beginning of the year. In addition, #M t1 of the stores in the #O t total are stores that transitioned from generating sales at the mid rate MR t1 in year t1 to the old rate OR t in year t. Note from (2) that, even if the old store rate isn t changing over time, if MR t1 < OR t1 then a firm could show healthy same store growth rates as long as they keep opening new stores. As the young stores mature from earning MR t1 to earnings OR t the comparable growth rate will be positive. However, when new store openings slow there will be precipitous drop in the comparable store growth rate. One simplification of the model that we will consider adds the constraint MR t1 = OR t1. hat is, after the end of the fiscal year in which a store opens, it immediately generates sales at the old store rate. his implies that ORt C t = 1. (3) OR t1 Equation (3) is the most obvious expression of same store sales growth although it is clearly a simplification. he simplification is unreasonable for two different types of stores. For stores where consumers make large but infrequent purchases or stores that require consumers to change 6
8 their shopping habits, it may well take more than a year to reach maturity, so that MR t1 < OR t1. Alternatively, some stores enjoy a fad status in the early months and this might extend beyond the store opening year s fiscal end, making MR t1 > OR t1. In our empirical tests we document some examples of store types that fit each of these descriptions. However, for much of our analysis we will use the simplifying assumption that MR t1 = OR t1. Because we estimate our sales model for each firm individually over time, the error term in a levels regression is unlikely to be stationary. For this reason we take first differences: Sales t = #O t OR t  #O t1 OR t1 + #M t MR t  #M t1 MR t1 + #N t NR t  #N t1 NR t1. (4) At this point our model is still a tautology: each salesgenerating rate is allowed to change every period so that, by definition, equation 4 holds. In order to estimate the different sales rates we need to impose some restriction over time. A tempting restriction is simply to assume the three rates are constant over time. Unfortunately this assumption is incompatible with the fact that firms rarely report comparable store growth rates that are zero each period. Ignoring the complications of mid store rates versus old store rates, (3) shows that the comparable store growth rate is the change in the salesgenerating rate for old stores over time; the very thing we were tempted to assume was zero. he trick in the estimation will be to use the historical comparable store growth rate for the firm to control for the known changes in the salesgenerating rates over time so that we can estimate an underlying rate that is stable. Denote by the most recent year in the dataset for a particular firm. he necessary feature of any restriction we impose on the salegenerating rates is that it allows us to rewrite (4) for every period in terms of OR, MR and NR. he coefficients on these sales rate parameters are the 7
9 independent variables in the regression and, as we show next, they change to adjust for how far back in time the observation is from time. Our most general models are complicated because they estimate separate salesgenerating rates for old stores, mid stores and new stores. [Insert models 1 and 2 here  still a work in progress!] Model 3 greatly simplifies the regression by assuming that 1) MR t = OR t and 2) NR t = NR t1 (1+C t ). Assumption 1 says that after the fiscal year in which the store opens, it immediately earns at the same rate as an old store. his in turn implies that OR t = OR t1 (1+C t ), as discussed above. Assumption 2 says that the earn rate on new stores changes in the same way as the earn rate on the old stores; it too grows at the comparable store growth rate for the old stores. he idea behind assumption 2 is that the success of new stores is probably related to the success of the old stores. If the products being sold in the old stores are generating increasing sales dollars then it is likely that the new stores will enjoy similar increases in their sales rate. Using these two assumptions, we get the following sequence of sales changes: In the final year, Sales = (# O + # M ) OR (# O 1 + # M 1) OR 1+ # N NR # N 1NR 1. (5) We can rewrite (5) in terms of OR and NR using assumptions 1 and 2 to get 8
10 Sales (# O + # M ) (# N 1) = (# O + # M ) OR + (# N NR C. (1 ) (1 + C ) Note the different sources of changes in sales in year. Both terms are close to the change in the number of stores, either new stores in the second term or old plus mid stores in the first term. But for both terms the number of stores in year 1 is deflated by one plus the comparable store growth rate for year. By adjusting the beginning number of stores down using C like a deflator, the net change in brackets captures both the growth in the number of units and the growth in the salesgenerating rate of each unit. It effectively treats 100 stores at the beginning of the year, who grow samestore sales by 10%, as having 100/(1+.10) = stores at the beginning of the year. More generally, for year , where counts back in time to the first year of data for an individual firm, we have Sales = ( 1+ C )(# O + # M ) (# O 1 + # M 1) (1 + C )# N # N 1 OR + NR. i= (1 + C ) i i= (1 + C ) i he numerator for each term captures the change in sales due to changes in the number of stores of each type and the comparable store growth rate for that year. he denominator of each term adjusts the data each year to be stated in terms of year sales dollars. Note that we could move the denominator to the LHS of the equation and we would be inflating the historical data so that every observation is stated in terms of year sales dollars, given the firm s history of comparable store growth rates. In this way we control for the known variation in the OR t and NR t series and can estimate the parameters OR and NR. 9
11 Model 4 is a minor variation on model 3. Instead of assuming that the new store rate changes at the same rate as the comparable store growth rate, this model assumes that the new store rate is constant over time. hat is, 1) MR t = OR t and 2) NR t = NR t1. he best argument for a constant salesgenerating rate for new stores is that it is a simple assumption. We offer it as an alternative because the assumption in model 3, that the rates for both types of stores change at the same rate, might be grossly in error. For example, it could be that whenever a retail firm s old stores start suffering declining sales, so that their comparable growth rate is negative, they introduce new stores with a fresh design and new product ideas such that a new store earns about the same amount over time even while the old store rate is declining. Following the same derivation as in model 3 with this one slight variation gives Sales = ( 1 + C )(# O + # M ) (# O 1 + # M 1) # N # N 1 OR + NR. i= (1+ C ) i i= (1+ C ) i he only difference between models 3 and 4 is in the second term where model 3 adjusts the number of new stores in year  up by (1+C  ) to capture the assumed increase in the new store rate and model 4 does not. Besides the 4 models derived above, we measure the explanatory power and forecasting accuracy of a number of ad hoc approaches to sales forecasting. hese models serve as benchmarks to measure the relative improvement that comes from modeling the effects of different types of 10
12 stores and the comparable store growth rate. Model 5 assumes that next year s sales equals this year s sales: Sales  = 0. Model 6 is similar to model 5 except that we estimate the intercept α: Sales  = α + ε. Nissim and Penman (2001) document the mean reversion rate in each decile of sales growth in a large sample of firms. o use this idea for model 7 we sort the crosssection of firms in our sample into deciles of percentage sales growth in year t1 and measure the median sales growth for each decile in year t, denoting it as SG j j=1 to 10. his gives Sales  = Sales 1 SG j. he next three models represent the crass empiricist view. Each estimates a regression of the change in sales on the changes in the different types of stores and each is estimated firm by firm, much like the derived models 1 though 4. None of the models take the comparable store growth rates into account. his means that they treat the estimated sales rate as a constant even though it is changing over time. Model 8 lumps all types of stores together, estimating the average sales rate per store: Sales  = β[(#o  + #M  + #N  ) (#O 1 + #M 1 + #N 1 )] + ε . Model 9 distinguishes between new stores and old plus mid stores, much like model 3 above: Sales  = γ 1 [(#O  + #M  ) (#O 1 + #M 1 )] + γ 2 [#N  #N 1 ] + ε . 11
13 Model 10 estimates a separate rate for each type of store, much like model 1 above: Sales  = η 1 [#O  #O 1 ] + η 2 [#M  #M 1 ] + η 3 [#N  #N 1 ] + ε . he Sample o generate outofsample forecasts we need a sample of firms that disclose their estimated number of store openings/closings in the next fiscal year. While this is a common disclosure in the retail industry, it is not a required disclosure. Rather than randomly searching press releases and 10K filings, we begin with the 104 retail firms on Valueline that have a store forecast in 2001, reasoning that Valueline probably got this information from the firm. In addition, to estimate our model for each fiscal year we need the number of stores at year end and the comparable store growth rate. o obtain this information we search each firm s 10K filing for the following information: 1) number of stores at year end 2) stores opened during the year 3) stores closed during the year 4) expected number of store openings/closings for the following year 5) comparable store growth rate. In the vast majority of cases the number of stores at the end of the year and the comparable store growth rate for the year where available in the MD&A section of the 10K. Firms disclosed the number of stores openings and closings separately 76% of the time. If this information was not disclosed we computed the change in the ending number of stores and, if the difference was positive we assumed this was the number of stores opened and none were closed, if the difference was negative we assumed this was the number of stores closed and none were opened. 12
14 We also require that the firm s fiscal year end doesn t change between 1990 and 2002 and has a minimum of six years of sequential annual data in order to estimate our model. his results in a sample of 78 firms and 691 firmyears with sufficient historical data to estimate the models discussed earlier. Of these 78 firms, 68 firms and 239 firmyears disclosed the expected number of store openings/closings in at least one year; these observations are used for outofsample forecasting tests. able 1 gives the list of sample firms and their sales and numbers of total stores as of fiscal able 2, panel A gives descriptive statistics for the sample. he median firm has sales of $ million and annual sales growth of 11.8%. Median comparable store sales growth is 4%, meaning that a large component of annual sales growth is due to opening new stores. he distribution of industry sales growth is similar to the comparable store sales growth, where the industry sales are taken from the US Census Bureau s Advance Monthly Sales for Retail rade (discussed in more detail later). In terms of stores, the median firm has 498 total stores, opens 44 new stores and closes 4 stores. here are a few very large firms in the sample, such as Walmart, that skew the sales and store count distributions. We estimate our model firm by firm, however, so the differences in size across firms should not influence our statistics. able 2, panel B gives the correlations between our main variables. As one might expect, sales growth is negatively correlated with the number of closed stores and positively correlated with the number of new stores opened. Sales growth is also negatively correlated with the total number of stores, implying that larger firms have lower sales growth than smaller firms. he comparable store growth rate shows a similar pattern. All the positive correlations between the numbers of different types of stores shown in the lower part of table 2 are driven by size; large firms open more stores, close more stores and have more stores. 13
15 Results for InSample Estimates We begin by estimating the four versions of our model (models 14) and the six benchmark models (models 510) using the entire history of available data. Each model is estimated separately for each firm based on a minimum of six observations per firm, and a median of nine observations per firm. he empirical specifications for each model are exactly as given in the model section. In particular, the dependent variable is the change in sales (in millions) each year, the independent variables are the derived changes in the number of stores in each category, adjusted for the historical and current comparable store growth rates, and there is no intercept in the regression. able 3 gives summary statistics from the insample regressions. Beginning with model 3, the median estimated sales rate for old+mid stores (i.e. old stores and mid stores) is $4.376 million per store and for new stores is $2.233 million per store. Given that new stores are open, on average, only half a fiscal year, the fact that the new store rate is roughly half the old+mid store rate implies these two types of stores fundamentally generate sales at about the same daily rate. But looking at the median rates across the sample can be misleading. Later we give examples of firms with radically different new store rates and old+mid store rates. he median significance of the estimated rates for model 3 is impressive given the extremely small sample in each regression. In addition, the estimated old+mid stores sales rate is positive in 77 of the 78 regressions (99%), the estimated new store rate is positive in 75 of the 78 regressions (96%), and the median adjusted R 2 is 92.9%. 4 Finally, given our goal of forecasting future sales changes, we also compute for each firm the median absolute residual error scaled by total sales for the year. he median of this statistic across our 78 firms is.020, or 2% of sales. 4 he Adjusted R 2 for a model without an intercept is slightly different from the standard definition. It is computed as the squared sample correlation between the actual values and fitted values from the regression (see Greene, page ). In addition, although we differenced the sales time series to control for nonstationarity, it is still possible that growth in sales might cause heteroskedastic errors. We test this hypothesis and reject homoskedasticity in only 1 of 78 cases at the 0.10 level. 14
16 Recall that the only difference between model 4 and model 3 is that model 4 assumes that the new store sales rate is constant over time will model 3 assumes that it changes with the comparable store growth rate. Given this small difference, it isn t surprising that the results for model 4 are very similar to model 3. Because model 3 has a slightly lower median pvalue on the new store rate, a slightly higher number of positive coefficients on the old+mid store rate and has a slightly higher adjusted R 2, we will focus on model 3 in our comparisons with the benchmark models. However, as seen below, there are individual firms where model 4 is definitely superior to model 3 (still to be done). Model 3 easily beats the six benchmark models shown in the lower half of table 3. Of the three benchmark models that don t use the number of stores in their estimation, the model that estimates a constant percentage change in sales (model 6) has the lowest median residual error. But, at 4.8% of sales, this median error is more than twice as large as the error for model 3. he three benchmark models that estimate coefficients on changes in the number of stores, but do not take into account the movement between store types or the comparable store growth rates, show improvement over the other benchmark models, but are still worse than model 3. Model 8 regresses the change in sales on the change in the total number of stores, resulting in a 4.4% residual error. Model 9 regresses the change in sales on the changes in the number of old+mid stores and new stores, resulting in a 3.6% residual error. Model 9 is most comparable to model 3, yet the adjusted R 2 is still more than 10% lower than the R 2 on model 3 and the median residual error is 3.6% of sales, more the 70% greater than model 3 s residual error. For a statistical comparison between model 3 and model 9, we compute the median absolute residual error (scaled by sales) for each firm using each model. We then conduct a signed rank test of difference between the two models and find that model 3 has significantly lower errors than model 9 at the.0001 level. By taking into 15
17 account the change in different types of stores and how the comparable store growth rate affects each store type, model 3 yields significantly lower errors. he median coefficients, adjusted R 2 s and residual errors are useful statistics for assessing the overall accuracy of the different models but they give little insight into the nuances of the model at the individual firm level. able 4 gives the individual firm estimates of the new store rate and the old+mid store rate. Both estimates are usually significant at the.10 level, suggesting that the model is sufficiently flexible to work well for most firms, despite the fact that the typical regression has only nine observations. When examining the individual company estimates keep in mind that a new store is probably only open half a year so, even if the new stores and old+mid stores immediately have the same daily sales rates, the estimated annual new store rate will be half the old+mid rate. With this as a benchmark, we test the hypothesis that the new store rate is half the old store rate and cannot reject this hypothesis at the.10 level in 50 of the 78 companies. However, for 28 of the 78 firms, there is a significant difference between the new store rate and half the old store rate (as identified by the superscript F by the R 2 ). For these firms it is important to estimate separate sales rates for the two types of stores. Consider a few examples that illustrate the importance of estimating different new store rates and old+mid store rates. As a benchmark, he Gap earns $3.69 million per old+mid store and $1.81 per new store, so the new store rate is very close to half of the old+mid store rate (as shown in table 4). Assuming that the average new store is opened half way through the fiscal year, this implies that he Gap has neither a sales frenzy when they first open nor a long maturity period before their stores are at steady state. In contrast, grocery stores typically open with heavy advertising and promotions, causing the new store rate to far exceed half the old+mid store rate. Albertsons, Safeway and Whole Foods all show this effect in our sample; for each of these companies the new store rate is significantly higher than half the old store rate. he most extreme example of a new store effect is Bed, Bath and Beyond, whose new 16
18 store rate of $19.98 million per store is more than 5 times as large as the old+mid rate of $3.66 million per store. At the other extreme, companies whose old+mid rate is significantly higher than twice the new store rate are slow to mature, possibly because their stores sell products that are infrequent purchases or that require changes in customer shopping habits. In our sample, weeters, who sell highend stereo equipment, might be the best example. heir old+mid rate is $5.47 million and their new store rate is only $0.72 million. Other examples in our sample are JC Penney and Ross Stores, both large department stores who take some time to reach maturity. In sum, our model of sales growth, with the model 3 restrictions that 1) the mid store rate equals the old store rate and 2) the new store rate changes with the comparable store growth rate, is the best model for describing changes in sales across our sample of retail firms. It is the most parsimonious of the four models we present and it fits the data significantly better than the ad hoc benchmark models. In the next section we discuss how to use this model to make outofsample forecasts and examine the resulting outofsample forecast accuracy. Results for OutofSample Forecasts o use the model to forecast future changes in sales, we need three things. We need a forecast of the number of stores the firm will open or close in the next year, we need a forecast of the comparable store growth rate for the firm in the next year, and we need to estimate the salesgenerating rates for the different categories of stores from a subset of the data prior to the year being forecasted. In our sample 68 of the 78 firms disclosed their expected number of store openings/closings at least once during the sample period. In 2002, 65 firms disclose this information, but it becomes less common the further we go back in time. We also use five years of observations to estimate the model, leaving 239 outofsample forecasts between 1997 and
19 he most difficult ingredient to find for our model is an estimate of the comparable store growth rate for the firm in the next year. While firms will sometimes make predictions for the next month or quarter (e.g. Home Depot), it is rare to make such a prediction for a full year into the future. In table 5, we assume that the comparable store sales growth rate is equal to the previous year s rate. We then improve on this assumption in later tables. Recall that the insample median residual error on model 3 is 2.0% of sales, as shown in table 3. Because this error is after the regression used the realized store counts and comparable store growth rates, and optimally fit the sales rates coefficients, the 2.0% error rate is a lower bound on the outofsample forecast error. Not surprisingly, the outofsample median forecast error increases to 4.6% in table 5, where the firm s past comparable store growth rate is used as the forecast for the next year s rate. hree other benchmarks for model 3 are the errors that result when the model estimates the sales rates on five prior years of data but then uses perfect foresight for the number of store openings/closings, the comparable store growth rate, or both. hese are presented in panel B of table 5. Interestingly, perfect foresight with respect to the number of store opening/closings does not significantly reduce the error for model 3. his suggests that when managers forecast store openings or closings, these forecasts tend to be accurate. However, when the model uses perfect foresight for comparable store sales growth, the error is reduced to approximately 2.7%. hese results suggest that the key to generating a more accurate outofsample forecast is developing a more accurate forecast of the next year s comparable store growth rate. In table 6 we present a few alternative models of comparable store growth. We bring three sources of data to bear: the company s own history of comparable store growth rates, and two different sources of industry sales growth rates. Roughly two weeks after each month end the US Census Bureau releases the Advance Monthly Sales Report for Retail rade documenting the 18
20 seasonally adjusted (but not price adjusted) sales figures for the month from the different NAICS codes within the Retail sector. he advantage of this source of industry data is that we can match it to the specific NAICS code of each firm; the disadvantage is that it covers both private and public firms in the retail industry, not just the public firms in our sample, so it may not be representative. For this reason we also collect comparable monthly data from Walmart, the largest retailer in the industry. Approximately one week after each month end Walmart discloses their comparable store growth rate for the month. 5 In table 6, panel A, we provide a correlation matrix with comparable store sales growth, prior year comparable store sales growth and our two industry sales growth measures. Current and prior year comparable store sales growth are correlated at Industry growth is also significantly and positively correlated with current year comparable store sales growth, but Walmart comparable store sales growth is only weakly correlated with current year comparable store sales growth. his variable is, however, positively correlated with industry sales growth, consistent with the idea that Walmart is a proxy for the whole retail industry. We consider two competing models of comparable store sales growth, as follows: C t = α 0 + α 1 C t1 + ε (model A) C t = β 1 C t1 + (1β 1 )R t + µ (model B) where C t is comparable store sales growth in year t and R t is equal to one of the two industry sales growth rates discussed above. Model A is a simple meanreversion model, assuming the estimated intercept is greater than one and the estimated slope is less than one. Model B simply takes the weighted average of the prior year comparable store growth rate and the industry rate, where the weight is estimated. We estimate the regression models above in a pooled regression, and provide 5 Monthly comparable store growth rates compare the sales in stores open for the same full month in the previous year fiscal year. Consequently, they are naturally seasonally adjusted. 19
Forecasting Sales: A Model and Some Evidence from the Retail Industry*
Forecasting Sales: A Model and Some Evidence from the Retail Industry* ASHER B. CURTIS, University of Washington RUSSELL J. LUNDHOLM, University of British Columbia SARAH E. MCVAY, University of Washington
More informationRetail & Consumer Insights
www.pwc.com/us/retailandconsumer Retail & Consumer Insights Accounting & reporting considerations related to online sales U.S. retail ecommerce sales are forecasted to approximate $224.2 billion in 2012,
More informationPurchase Obligations, Earnings Persistence and Stock Returns
Purchase Obligations, Earnings Persistence and Stock Returns Kwang J. Lee Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley Email: klee@haas.berkeley.edu. January 2010 Abstract This paper examines
More informationDr. Pushpa Bhatt, Sumangala JK Department of Commerce, Bangalore University, India pushpa_bhatt12@rediffmail.com; sumangalajkashok@gmail.
Journal of Finance, Accounting and Management, 3(2), 114, July 2012 1 Impact of Earnings per share on Market Value of an equity share: An Empirical study in Indian Capital Market Dr. Pushpa Bhatt, Sumangala
More informationNCSS Statistical Software Principal Components Regression. In ordinary least squares, the regression coefficients are estimated using the formula ( )
Chapter 340 Principal Components Regression Introduction is a technique for analyzing multiple regression data that suffer from multicollinearity. When multicollinearity occurs, least squares estimates
More informationDOES IT PAY TO HAVE FAT TAILS? EXAMINING KURTOSIS AND THE CROSSSECTION OF STOCK RETURNS
DOES IT PAY TO HAVE FAT TAILS? EXAMINING KURTOSIS AND THE CROSSSECTION OF STOCK RETURNS By Benjamin M. Blau 1, Abdullah Masud 2, and Ryan J. Whitby 3 Abstract: Xiong and Idzorek (2011) show that extremely
More informationFactors Influencing Price/Earnings Multiple
Learning Objectives Foundation of Research Forecasting Methods Factors Influencing Price/Earnings Multiple Passive & Active Asset Management Investment in Foreign Markets Introduction In the investment
More informationExclusion of Stockbased Compensation Expense from Analyst Earnings Forecasts: Incentive and Informationbased Explanations. Mary E.
Exclusion of Stockbased Compensation Expense from Analyst Earnings Forecasts: Incentive and Informationbased Explanations Mary E. Barth* Ian D. Gow Daniel J. Taylor Graduate School of Business Stanford
More informationJetBlue Airways Stock Price Analysis and Prediction
JetBlue Airways Stock Price Analysis and Prediction Team Member: Lulu Liu, Jiaojiao Liu DSO530 Final Project JETBLUE AIRWAYS STOCK PRICE ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION 1 Motivation Started in February 2000, JetBlue
More informationDiscretionary Accruals and Earnings Management: An Analysis of Pseudo Earnings Targets
THE ACCOUNTING REVIEW Vol. 81, No. 3 2006 pp. 617 652 Discretionary Accruals and Earnings Management: An Analysis of Pseudo Earnings Targets Benjamin C. Ayers University of Georgia John (Xuefeng) Jiang
More informationPlease NOTE This example report is for a manufacturing company; however, we can address a similar report for any industry sector.
Please NOTE This example report is for a manufacturing company; however, we can address a similar report for any industry sector. Performance Review For the period ended 12/31/2013 Provided By Holbrook
More informationA Primer on Forecasting Business Performance
A Primer on Forecasting Business Performance There are two common approaches to forecasting: qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative forecasting methods are important when historical data is not available.
More informationFour Topics to Consider when Using Inventory as Collateral
An AccuVal Associates, Inc. White Paper Four Topics to Consider when Using Inventory as Collateral By: Eric M. Marschke; Alexander L. Sutton March 2008 Inventory is excellent collateral for asset based
More informationThe effect of real earnings management on the information content of earnings
The effect of real earnings management on the information content of earnings ABSTRACT George R. Wilson Northern Michigan University This study investigates the effect of real earnings management (REM)
More informationMultiple Linear Regression in Data Mining
Multiple Linear Regression in Data Mining Contents 2.1. A Review of Multiple Linear Regression 2.2. Illustration of the Regression Process 2.3. Subset Selection in Linear Regression 1 2 Chap. 2 Multiple
More informationWhat Do ShortTerm Liquidity Ratios Measure? What Is Working Capital? How Is the Current Ratio Calculated? How Is the Quick Ratio Calculated?
What Do ShortTerm Liquidity Ratios Measure? What Is Working Capital? HOCK international  2004 1 HOCK international  2004 2 How Is the Current Ratio Calculated? How Is the Quick Ratio Calculated? HOCK
More informationA Review of Cross Sectional Regression for Financial Data You should already know this material from previous study
A Review of Cross Sectional Regression for Financial Data You should already know this material from previous study But I will offer a review, with a focus on issues which arise in finance 1 TYPES OF FINANCIAL
More informationDo IndustrySpecific Performance Measures Predict Returns? The Case of SameStore Sales. Halla Yang March 16, 2007
Do IndustrySpecific Performance Measures Predict Returns? The Case of SameStore Sales. Halla Yang March 16, 2007 Introduction Each industry has its own natural performance metrics. Revenuepassenger
More informationEarnings Announcement and Abnormal Return of S&P 500 Companies. Luke Qiu Washington University in St. Louis Economics Department Honors Thesis
Earnings Announcement and Abnormal Return of S&P 500 Companies Luke Qiu Washington University in St. Louis Economics Department Honors Thesis March 18, 2014 Abstract In this paper, I investigate the extent
More informationFinancial Statement Analysis of Leverage and How It Informs About Profitability and PricetoBook Ratios
Financial Statement Analysis of Leverage and How It Informs About Profitability and PricetoBook Ratios Doron Nissim Graduate School of Business Columbia University 3022 Broadway, Uris Hall 604 New York,
More informationInternet Appendix to. Why does the Option to Stock Volume Ratio Predict Stock Returns? Li Ge, TseChun Lin, and Neil D. Pearson.
Internet Appendix to Why does the Option to Stock Volume Ratio Predict Stock Returns? Li Ge, TseChun Lin, and Neil D. Pearson August 9, 2015 This Internet Appendix provides additional empirical results
More informationAn Analysis of Price Determination and Markups in the AirConditioning and Heating Equipment Industry
LBNL52791 An Analysis of Price Determination and Markups in the AirConditioning and Heating Equipment Industry Larry Dale, Dev Millstein, Katie Coughlin, Robert Van Buskirk, Gregory Rosenquist, Alex
More informationChapter 9: Inventories. Raw materials and consumables Finished goods Work in Progress Variants of valuation at historical cost other valuation rules
Chapter 9: Inventories Raw materials and consumables Finished goods Work in Progress Variants of valuation at historical cost other valuation rules 1 Characteristics of Inventories belong to current assets
More informationCentralized versus Decentralized Business Strategy: Which is better for growth?
Centralized versus Decentralized Business Strategy: Which is better for growth? McDonalds Corporation (MCD) is the world s largest fast food chain. MCD s business strategy is centralized, resulting in
More informationAbnormal Audit Fees and Audit Opinion Further Evidence from China s Capital Market
Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Opinion Further Evidence from China s Capital Market Zanchun Xie a, Chun Cai a and Jianming Ye b,* a School of Accounting, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics,
More information1 Uncertainty and Preferences
In this chapter, we present the theory of consumer preferences on risky outcomes. The theory is then applied to study the demand for insurance. Consider the following story. John wants to mail a package
More informationc 2015, Jeffrey S. Simonoff 1
Modeling Lowe s sales Forecasting sales is obviously of crucial importance to businesses. Revenue streams are random, of course, but in some industries general economic factors would be expected to have
More informationThe information content of lagged equity and bond yields
Economics Letters 68 (2000) 179 184 www.elsevier.com/ locate/ econbase The information content of lagged equity and bond yields Richard D.F. Harris *, Rene SanchezValle School of Business and Economics,
More informationForecasting Analysts Forecast Errors. Jing Liu * jiliu@anderson.ucla.edu. and. Wei Su wsu@anderson.ucla.edu. Mailing Address:
Forecasting Analysts Forecast Errors By Jing Liu * jiliu@anderson.ucla.edu and Wei Su wsu@anderson.ucla.edu Mailing Address: 110 Westwood Plaza, Suite D403 Anderson School of Management University of California,
More informationIs the Forward Exchange Rate a Useful Indicator of the Future Exchange Rate?
Is the Forward Exchange Rate a Useful Indicator of the Future Exchange Rate? Emily Polito, Trinity College In the past two decades, there have been many empirical studies both in support of and opposing
More informationMULTIPLE REGRESSION AND ISSUES IN REGRESSION ANALYSIS
MULTIPLE REGRESSION AND ISSUES IN REGRESSION ANALYSIS MSR = Mean Regression Sum of Squares MSE = Mean Squared Error RSS = Regression Sum of Squares SSE = Sum of Squared Errors/Residuals α = Level of Significance
More informationWhy Does the Change in Shares Predict Stock Returns? William R. Nelson 1 Federal Reserve Board January 1999 ABSTRACT The stock of firms that issue equity has, on average, performed poorly in subsequent
More informationDeterminants of shortterm debt financing
ABSTRACT Determinants of shortterm debt financing Richard H. Fosberg William Paterson University In this study, it is shown that both theories put forward to explain the amount of shortterm debt financing
More informationRecall this chart that showed how most of our course would be organized:
Chapter 4 OneWay ANOVA Recall this chart that showed how most of our course would be organized: Explanatory Variable(s) Response Variable Methods Categorical Categorical Contingency Tables Categorical
More informationDOES BLACK FRIDAY STILL MATTER?
LPL RESEARCH PRIVATE CLIENT THOUGHT LEADERSHIP DISRUPTIVE INSIGHTS DOES BLACK FRIDAY STILL MATTER? November 215 SALES FOR THE HOLIDAY SEASON OVERALL HAVE ACTUALLY INCREASED OVER THE YEARS, DESPITE THE
More informationFirmlevel sales forecasts for retailers can be improved if we incorporate cost of goods sold, inventory, and
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Vol. 56, No. 9, September 2010, pp. 1519 1533 issn 00251909 eissn 15265501 10 5609 1519 informs doi 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1209 2010 INFORMS Do Inventory and Gross Margin Data Improve Sales
More informationIn this chapter, we build on the basic knowledge of how businesses
03Seidman.qxd 5/15/04 11:52 AM Page 41 3 An Introduction to Business Financial Statements In this chapter, we build on the basic knowledge of how businesses are financed by looking at how firms organize
More informationIn this chapter, you will learn improvement curve concepts and their application to cost and price analysis.
7.0  Chapter Introduction In this chapter, you will learn improvement curve concepts and their application to cost and price analysis. Basic Improvement Curve Concept. You may have learned about improvement
More informationInvestor recognition and stock returns
Rev Acc Stud (2008) 13:327 361 DOI 10.1007/s111420079063y Investor recognition and stock returns Reuven Lehavy Æ Richard G. Sloan Published online: 9 January 2008 Ó Springer Science+Business Media,
More informationThe Determinants and the Value of Cash Holdings: Evidence. from French firms
The Determinants and the Value of Cash Holdings: Evidence from French firms Khaoula SADDOUR Cahier de recherche n 20066 Abstract: This paper investigates the determinants of the cash holdings of French
More informationOptimizeRx OPRX. Buy. Platform Potential Continues to Grow $0.87 $4.00. Refer to the last two pages of this report for Disclosures
Nov 14, 2014 Healthcare OptimizeRx Platform Potential Continues to Grow Other OTC OPRX Buy Rating Unchanged Current Price $0.87 Target Price $4.00 Market Capitalization 20.32M Shares Outstanding 23.36M
More informationEXTRAPOLATION BIAS: INSIDER TRADING IMPROVEMENT SIGNAL
EXTRAPOLATION BIAS: INSIDER TRADING IMPROVEMENT SIGNAL HIGHLIGHTS Consistent with previous studies, we find that knowledge of insider trading is valuable to noninsider investors. We find that the change
More informationFORECASTING DEPOSIT GROWTH: Forecasting BIF and SAIF Assessable and Insured Deposits
Technical Paper Series Congressional Budget Office Washington, DC FORECASTING DEPOSIT GROWTH: Forecasting BIF and SAIF Assessable and Insured Deposits Albert D. Metz Microeconomic and Financial Studies
More informationUnderstanding Financial Management: A Practical Guide Guideline Answers to the Concept Check Questions
Understanding Financial Management: A Practical Guide Guideline Answers to the Concept Check Questions Chapter 3 Interpreting Financial Ratios Concept Check 3.1 1. What are the different motivations that
More informationChapter 9. The Valuation of Common Stock. 1.The Expected Return (Copied from Unit02, slide 39)
Readings Chapters 9 and 10 Chapter 9. The Valuation of Common Stock 1. The investor s expected return 2. Valuation as the Present Value (PV) of dividends and the growth of dividends 3. The investor s required
More informationYao Zheng University of New Orleans. Eric Osmer University of New Orleans
ABSTRACT The pricing of China Region ETFs  an empirical analysis Yao Zheng University of New Orleans Eric Osmer University of New Orleans Using a sample of exchangetraded funds (ETFs) that focus on investing
More informationBusiness Valuation Review
Business Valuation Review Regression Analysis in Valuation Engagements By: George B. Hawkins, ASA, CFA Introduction Business valuation is as much as art as it is science. Sage advice, however, quantitative
More informationStockPicking Strategies: Growth Investing
StockPicking Strategies: Growth Investing Investopedia In the late 1990s, when technology companies were flourishing, growth investing techniques yielded unprecedented returns for investors. But before
More informationHOW TO DETECT AND PREVENT FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD (SECOND EDITION) (NO. 995401)
HOW TO DETECT AND PREVENT FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD (SECOND EDITION) (NO. 995401) VI. INVESTIGATION TECHNIQUES FOR FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL STATEMENT ALLEGATIONS Financial Statement Analysis Financial statement
More informationConstructing Portfolios of ConstantMaturity Fixed Income ETFs
Constructing Portfolios of ConstantMaturity Fixed Income ETFs Newfound Research LLC December 2013 For more information about Newfound Research call us at +16175319773, visit us at www.thinknewfound.com
More informationRobert and Mary Sample
Comprehensive Financial Plan Sample Plan Robert and Mary Sample Prepared by : John Poels, ChFC, AAMS Senior Financial Advisor February 11, 2009 Table Of Contents IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION 17 Presentation
More informationAge to Age Factor Selection under Changing Development Chris G. Gross, ACAS, MAAA
Age to Age Factor Selection under Changing Development Chris G. Gross, ACAS, MAAA Introduction A common question faced by many actuaries when selecting loss development factors is whether to base the selected
More informationTHE U.S. CURRENT ACCOUNT: THE IMPACT OF HOUSEHOLD WEALTH
THE U.S. CURRENT ACCOUNT: THE IMPACT OF HOUSEHOLD WEALTH Grant Keener, Sam Houston State University M.H. Tuttle, Sam Houston State University 21 ABSTRACT Household wealth is shown to have a substantial
More informationThe NCAA Basketball Betting Market: Tests of the Balanced Book and Levitt Hypotheses
The NCAA Basketball Betting Market: Tests of the Balanced Book and Levitt Hypotheses Rodney J. Paul, St. Bonaventure University Andrew P. Weinbach, Coastal Carolina University Kristin K. Paul, St. Bonaventure
More informationUNIVERSITY OF SWAZILAND BCOMIV AC418 THREE (3) HOURS
UNIVERSITY OF SWAZILAND DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING MAIN EXAMINATION QUESTION PAPER DEGREEIYEAR OF STUDY BCOMIV TITLE OF PAPER AUDITING 2 COURSE CODE TIME ALLOWED AC418 THREE (3) HOURS INSTRUCTIONS 1. TOTAL
More information11.3 BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS. Fixed and Variable Costs
385 356 PART FOUR Capital Budgeting a large number of NPV estimates that we summarize by calculating the average value and some measure of how spread out the different possibilities are. For example, it
More informationProject LINK Meeting New York, 2022 October 2010. Country Report: Australia
Project LINK Meeting New York,  October 1 Country Report: Australia Prepared by Peter Brain: National Institute of Economic and Industry Research, and Duncan Ironmonger: Department of Economics, University
More informationA Test Of The M&M Capital Structure Theories Richard H. Fosberg, William Paterson University, USA
A Test Of The M&M Capital Structure Theories Richard H. Fosberg, William Paterson University, USA ABSTRACT Modigliani and Miller (1958, 1963) predict two very specific relationships between firm value
More informationLina Warrad. Applied Science University, Amman, Jordan
Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, March 2015, Vol. 11, No. 3, 168174 doi: 10.17265/15486583/2015.03.006 D DAVID PUBLISHING The Effect of Net Working Capital on Jordanian Industrial and Energy
More informationREBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF BRYAN IRRGANG ON SALES AND REVENUE FORECASTING
BEFORE THE LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY  IN THE MATTER of a ThreeYear Rate Plan Case 00 
More informationThe Relation between Accruals and Uncertainty. Salman Arif arifs@indiana.edu. Nathan Marshall nathmars@indiana.edu
The Relation between Accruals and Uncertainty Salman Arif arifs@indiana.edu Nathan Marshall nathmars@indiana.edu Teri Lombardi Yohn tyohn@indiana.edu 1309 E 10 th Street Kelley School of Business Indiana
More informationCHAPTER FOURTEEN. Simple Forecasting and Simple Valuation
CHAPTER FOURTEEN Simple Forecasting and Simple Valuation Concept Questions C14.1 Book values give a good forecast when they are reviewed at their fair value: applying the required return to book value
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS. Unit ECON 12122 Introduction to Econometrics. Notes 4 2. R and F tests
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Unit ECON 11 Introduction to Econometrics Notes 4 R and F tests These notes provide a summary of the lectures. They are not a complete account of the unit material. You should also
More informationCorporate Credit Analysis. Arnold Ziegel Mountain Mentors Associates
Corporate Credit Analysis Arnold Ziegel Mountain Mentors Associates I. Introduction The Goals and Nature of Credit Analysis II. Capital Structure and the Suppliers of Capital January, 2008 2008 Arnold
More informationFinding outperforming managers. Randolph B. Cohen Harvard Business School
Finding outperforming managers Randolph B. Cohen Harvard Business School 1 Conventional wisdom holds that: Managers can t pick stocks and therefore don t beat the market It s impossible to pick winning
More informationHow cheap is the FTSE 100?
How cheap is the FTSE 100? Nine snapshots of UK equity valuation US equities are very dear right now according to most credible longterm valuation metrics. This points to disappointing returns over the
More informationNational Small Business Network
National Small Business Network WRITTEN STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD US SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS JOINT HEARING ON TAX REFORM AND THE TAX TREATMENT
More informationImplementing Point and Figure RS Signals
Dorsey Wright Money Management 790 E. Colorado Blvd, Suite 808 Pasadena, CA 91101 6265350630 John Lewis, CMT August, 2014 Implementing Point and Figure RS Signals Relative Strength, also known as Momentum,
More informationDealing with Operating Leases in Valuation. Aswath Damodaran. Stern School of Business. 44 West Fourth Street. New York, NY 10012
Dealing with Operating Leases in Valuation Aswath Damodaran Stern School of Business 44 West Fourth Street New York, NY 10012 adamodar@stern.nyu.edu Abstract Most firm valuation models start with the aftertax
More informationTHE EFFECT ON RIVALS WHEN FIRMS EMERGE FROM BANKRUPTCY
THE EFFECT ON RIVALS WHEN FIRMS EMERGE FROM BANKRUPTCY Gary L. Caton *, Jeffrey Donaldson**, Jeremy Goh*** Abstract Studies on the announcement effects of bankruptcy filings have found that when a firm
More informationStrengthening Diverse Retail Business Processes with Forecasting: Practical Application of Forecasting Across the Retail Enterprise
Paper SAS18332015 Strengthening Diverse Retail Business Processes with Forecasting: Practical Application of Forecasting Across the Retail Enterprise Alex Chien, Beth Cubbage, Wanda Shive, SAS Institute
More informationBizScore Contractor Example
BizScore Contractor Example For the period ending 12/31/2009 Provided By www.bizscorevaluation.com 9198464747 bizscore@gmail.com Page 1 / 11 This report is designed to assist you in your business' development.
More informationChapter 14. Web Extension: Financing Feedbacks and Alternative Forecasting Techniques
Chapter 14 Web Extension: Financing Feedbacks and Alternative Forecasting Techniques I n Chapter 14 we forecasted financial statements under the assumption that the firm s interest expense can be estimated
More informationSection A. Index. Section A. Planning, Budgeting and Forecasting Section A.2 Forecasting techniques... 1. Page 1 of 11. EduPristine CMA  Part I
Index Section A. Planning, Budgeting and Forecasting Section A.2 Forecasting techniques... 1 EduPristine CMA  Part I Page 1 of 11 Section A. Planning, Budgeting and Forecasting Section A.2 Forecasting
More informationQuantitative Stock Selection 1. Introduction
Global Asset Allocation and Stock Selection Campbell R. Harvey 1. Introduction Research coauthored with Dana Achour Greg Hopkins Clive Lang 1 1. Introduction Issue Two decisions are important: Asset Allocation
More informationLecture 8: Stock market reaction to accounting data
Lecture 8: Stock market reaction to accounting data In this lecture we will focus on how the market appears to evaluate accounting disclosures. For most of the time, we shall be examining the results of
More informationInternet Appendix to CAPM for estimating cost of equity capital: Interpreting the empirical evidence
Internet Appendix to CAPM for estimating cost of equity capital: Interpreting the empirical evidence This document contains supplementary material to the paper titled CAPM for estimating cost of equity
More informationActive vs. Passive Money Management
Active vs. Passive Money Management Exploring the costs and benefits of two alternative investment approaches By Baird s Advisory Services Research Synopsis Proponents of active and passive investment
More informationDemographic Information and Additional Survey Responses Not Tabulated in Brown, Call, Clement, and Sharp (2015)
 ONLINE APPENDIX  Inside the Black Box of SellSide Financial Analysts Lawrence D. Brown Temple University ldbrown@temple.edu Andrew C. Call Arizona State University andycall@asu.edu Michael B. Clement*
More informationUNDERSTANDING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF YOUR PORTFOLIO
UNDERSTANDING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF YOUR PORTFOLIO Although I normally use this space to ruminate about various economic indicators and their implications, smartly advancing asset prices have encouraged
More informationEarnings Conference Call
Third dquate Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call Larry Merlo President & Chief Executive Officer Dave Denton Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer October 30, 2015 Forwardlooking Statements
More informationMeasuring Lost Profits Economic Damages on a Pretax Basis
Dispute Resolution Insights Best Practices Article Measuring Lost Profits Economic Damages on a Pretax Basis Robert P. Schweihs. The judicial remedy for many commercial disputes is an award of economic
More informationMomentum Traders in the Housing Market: Survey Evidence and a Search Model
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report 422 March 2009 Momentum Traders in the Housing Market: Survey Evidence and a Search Model Monika Piazzesi Stanford University and National
More informationAnalysis of Whether the Prices of Renewable Fuel Standard RINs Have Affected Retail Gasoline Prices
Analysis of Whether the Prices of Renewable Fuel Standard RINs Have Affected Retail Gasoline Prices A Whitepaper Prepared for the Renewable Fuels Association Key Findings Changes in prices of renewable
More informationFactors affecting online sales
Factors affecting online sales Table of contents Summary... 1 Research questions... 1 The dataset... 2 Descriptive statistics: The exploratory stage... 3 Confidence intervals... 4 Hypothesis tests... 4
More informationFUNDAMENTALS OF HEALTHCARE FINANCE. Online Appendix B Financial Analysis Ratios
3/27/09 FUNDAMENTALS OF HEALTHCARE FINANCE Online Appendix B Financial Analysis Ratios Introduction In Chapter 13 of Fundamentals of Healthcare Finance, we indicated that financial ratio analysis is a
More information2013 MBA Jump Start Program. Statistics Module Part 3
2013 MBA Jump Start Program Module 1: Statistics Thomas Gilbert Part 3 Statistics Module Part 3 Hypothesis Testing (Inference) Regressions 2 1 Making an Investment Decision A researcher in your firm just
More informationFactors Impacting Dairy Profitability: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Dairy Enterprise Data
www.agmanager.info Factors Impacting Dairy Profitability: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Dairy Enterprise Data August 2011 (available at www.agmanager.info) Kevin Dhuyvetter, (785) 5323527,
More informationWeb Extension: Financing Feedbacks and Alternative Forecasting Techniques
19878_09W_p001009.qxd 3/10/06 9:56 AM Page 1 C H A P T E R 9 Web Extension: Financing Feedbacks and Alternative Forecasting Techniques IMAGE: GETTY IMAGES, INC., PHOTODISC COLLECTION In Chapter 9 we forecasted
More informationAN ANALYSIS OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT RATIOS
AN ANALYSIS OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT RATIOS Richard L. Morris, College of Business, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC 29733, (803) 3232684, morrisr@winthrop.edu, Glenn L. Wood, College of Business, Winthrop
More informationCost of Capital and Project Valuation
Cost of Capital and Project Valuation 1 Background Firm organization There are four types: sole proprietorships partnerships limited liability companies corporations Each organizational form has different
More informationAccurately and Efficiently Measuring Individual Account Credit Risk On Existing Portfolios
Accurately and Efficiently Measuring Individual Account Credit Risk On Existing Portfolios By: Michael Banasiak & By: Daniel Tantum, Ph.D. What Are Statistical Based Behavior Scoring Models And How Are
More informationCHAPTER 8 STOCK VALUATION
CHAPTER 8 STOCK VALUATION Answers to Concepts Review and Critical Thinking Questions 5. The common stock probably has a higher price because the dividend can grow, whereas it is fixed on the preferred.
More informationPersistence of Value Relevance of the Employee Stock Options: An Investor Perspective in Biotech Industry
Persistence of Value Relevance of the Employee Stock Options: An Investor Perspective in Biotech Industry Sara Aliabadi Assistant Professor of Accounting, College of Business and Management, Department
More informationThe Effect Of Working Capital Management On Profitability
The Effect Of Working Capital Management On Profitability To maintain efficient levels of components of working capital, current liabilities and current assets is a strategy of managerial level accounting
More informationEn h a n c ed Ea r n i n g s a n d Ta x Revenues from a
En h a n c ed Ea r n i n g s a n d Ta x Revenues from a University of WisconsinWhitewater Degree: A Synthetic An a ly s i s by Russ Kashian Fiscal and Economic Research Center University of Wisconsin
More informationFinancial Terms & Calculations
Financial Terms & Calculations So much about business and its management requires knowledge and information as to financial measurements. Unfortunately these key terms and ratios are often misunderstood
More informationPITFALLS IN TIME SERIES ANALYSIS. Cliff Hurvich Stern School, NYU
PITFALLS IN TIME SERIES ANALYSIS Cliff Hurvich Stern School, NYU The t Test If x 1,..., x n are independent and identically distributed with mean 0, and n is not too small, then t = x 0 s n has a standard
More informationDo Tax Cuts Boost the Economy?
Do Tax Cuts Boost the Economy? David Rosnick and Dean Baker September 2011 Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20009 2022935380 www.cepr.net
More informationStock market booms and real economic activity: Is this time different?
International Review of Economics and Finance 9 (2000) 387 415 Stock market booms and real economic activity: Is this time different? Mathias Binswanger* Institute for Economics and the Environment, University
More information