Chicago Public Schools High School Personalization Toolkit
|
|
- Amanda Morgan
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chicago Public Schools High School Personalization Toolkit Created By: Dr. Laurel Crown, Susan Gann, and Joseph Halli
2 1. Introduction to Personalization 2. Theory of Change 3. Implementation Stages 4. Leadership 5. Academic Press 6. Postsecondary 7. Advisory 8. Common Planning Time 9. Planning Year 10. Technical Assistance
3 Personalization Toolkit Section 1 Introduction to Personalization
4 Personalization Toolkit - Introduction Why Personalization? In order to understand why personalization is essential to a highly functioning school, we must first understand what we mean when we use the word personalization. For our purposes, personalization is the intentional effort to create more positive and caring relationships between students and the adults responsible for teaching and mentoring them. (McClure, Yonezawa, and Jones) While it may seem obvious that positive relationships between teachers and students would be beneficial to student achievement, it is important to note just how critical that interaction is for student success. As Eric Jensen mentions in his book Teaching with Poverty in Mind, The relationships that teachers build with students form the single strongest access to student goals, socialization, motivation, and academic performance (Jensen, p. 20). It is the relationship that drives the academic and social success of a student and those relationships need to be established and nurtured. By getting to know their students, teachers can better respond to student needs, develop interventions that are timely and effective, and support student goals and dreams, both during their high school career and in postsecondary education. Schools that connect teachers with shared students multiply this effect, as teachers get to collaborate around best practices as they relate to individual students and provide a network of support that ensures that students do not fall through the cracks. While every school seeks to have positive relationships between students and teachers, it is important to realize that there are circumstances and structures that can be built to make these relationships flourish. It is critical for schools to design themselves in a way that is conducive to students having opportunities to be known by teachers and for teachers to have opportunities to discuss and support students. Just as a school builds in structures to support curriculum; mapping out a clear plan and then working to give teachers time to collaborate around their subject area, so too does a school need to build in structures to support personalization. Because there is a need to begin personalizing education for all students, the SLC team looked at the various models of personalization in CPS that can be leveraged as initial or next steps depending on how a school is currently organized for student support. In an effort to provide a scaffold approach to any school, the SLC team has designed five models of personalization to assist schools in analyzing where they are on the continuum of personalization. All five models stand independent of how the daily schedule is structured, traditional or block. All five models can be accomplished with any type of CPS schedule. In some instances block scheduling will be an added support and make the design of the schedule simpler. Each model requires a progressively higher level of strategic thinking around building priorities. The following gives a graphic and basic outline of what will be required to make each level of personalization work.
5 Personalization Toolkit - Introduction How Can Schools be Structured to Support Personalization? Personalization Level 1 Personalization Level 2 Personalization Level 3 Personalization Level 4 Personalization Level 5 Grade Level Grade Level Pods Vertically Aligned Pods Two Year Pod Structure Small Learning Communities
6 Personalization Toolkit - Introduction Personalization Level 1 Grade Level Optimal Conditions for Success Traditional vision of school model, students, few multi-year programs (ie CTE) Benefits Easiest to program, especially in CPS climate of fewest preps possible for teachers Most familiar to school staffs Challenges Very difficult to transfer student information to the next grade Harder to engage non-core teachers Hard to ensure common students if grade level is much over 150 students Scheduling Guidance Schedule teachers with as many classes as possible in one grade level At least in the first year, advisory teachers should have students from the grade level they teach Common planning time can be incorporated through grade level lunches (i.e. if all freshmen go to 3 rd period lunch, this can be a time for freshmen teachers to meet) Senior Team All Senior Students ~12-16 Senior Teachers Junior Team All Junior Students ~12-16 Junior Teachers Sophomore Team All Sophomore Students ~12-16 Sophomore Teachers Freshman Team All Freshman Students ~12-16 Freshman Teachers
7 Personalization Toolkit - Introduction Personalization Level 2 Grade Level Pods Optimal Conditions for Success Traditional vision of school model, students, few multi-year programs (ie CTE) Benefits Smaller number of students and teachers lead to more effective meetings Data can be disaggregated for the pod teams Can minimizes the number of teacher preps Better than Grade Level (Personalization Level 1) for larger schools where more than one teacher teaches a particular prep Challenges Relationships built are lost after the first year since there is no continuity to the pods Difficult to transfer student information to the next grade level Difficult to engage non-core teachers Requires advanced, strategic planning during programming Scheduling Guidance Form a strategic team to determine scheduling priorities Team students in five divisions together with a team of teachers Use this as the basis of scheduling While easiest to continue to use grade-level lunch (and then have all grade level pods meet at the same time), this can be varied as long as all teachers from a pod have a common time off (usually a lunch is still easiest) Senior Pod A Senior Pod B Senior Pod C ~150 Seniors ~ 5-7 Sr. Teachers ~150 Seniors ~ 5-7 Sr. Teachers ~150 Seniors ~ 5-7 Sr. Teachers Junior Pod A Junior Pod B Junior Pod C ~150 Juniors ~ 5-7 Jr. Teachers ~150 Juniors ~ 5-7 Jr. Teachers ~150 Juniors ~ 5-7 Jr. Teachers Soph. Pod A Soph Pod B Soph Pod C ~150 Sophs ~ 5-7 So. Teachers ~150 Sophs ~ 5-7 So. Teachers ~150 Sophs ~ 5-7 So. Teachers Freshman. Pod A Freshman Pod B Freshman Pod C ~150 Freshmen ~ 5-7 Fr. Teachers ~150 Freshmen ~ 5-7Fr. Teachers ~150 Freshmen ~ 5-7 Fr. Teachers
8 Personalization Toolkit - Introduction Personalization Level 3 Vertically Aligned Pods Optimal Conditions for Success Cohort vision of school model, students, multi-year programs present and can be supported through this model Benefits Transition information to teachers at next grade level about specific students about the complete child Students remain together, allowing them to develop relationships and supports Data can be disaggregated for pod teams Vertical nature of the pod structure can allow teachers to begin to connect across grade-level to support student through cross-grade conversations Challenges While still somewhat difficult to ensure transfer of knowledge of student strengths/challenges to next year teachers, this is improved with the vertical structure Strategic planning needs to take place in scheduling to ensure that students are moving properly forward Scheduling Guidance Form a strategic team to determine scheduling priorities Team students in five divisions together with a team of teachers Use this as the basis of scheduling and maintain the same divisions year in and year out While easiest to continue to use grade-level lunch (and have all p meet at the same time), this can be varied if all teachers from a pod have a common time off (usually lunch is still easiest) Senior Pod A ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers Senior Pod B ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers Senior Pod C ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers Junior Pod A ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers Junior Pod B ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers Junior Pod C ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers Sophomore Pod A ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers Sophomore Pod B ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers Sophomore Pod C ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers Freshman Pod A ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers Freshman Pod B ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers Freshman Pod C ~150 Students ~5-7 Teachers
9 Personalization Toolkit - Introduction Personalization Level 4 Two Year Pod Structure Optimal Conditions for Success Cohort vision of school model, students, multi-year programs present and can be supported through this model Benefits Teachers get opportunity to teach students for two years Students remain together, allowing them to develop relationships and supports Data can be disaggregated for pod teams Vertical nature of the pod structure reduces the transitions for students between pods from four to two, ensuring greater continuity Challenges There is still a transition between sophomore and junior year of students which will have to be done strategically Strategic planning needs to take place in scheduling to ensure that students are moving properly forward Teachers should have two preps to do in an ideal manner Scheduling Guidance Form a strategic team to determine scheduling priorities Team students in five divisions together with a team of teachers Use this as the basis of scheduling and maintain the same divisions year in and year out While easiest to continue to use grade-level lunch (and have all p meet at the same time), this can be varied if all teachers from a pod have a common time off (usually lunch is still easiest) Junior-Senior Pod A Students Teachers Junior-Senior Pod B Students Teachers Junior-Senior Pod C Students Teachers Freshman- Sophomore Pod A Students Teachers Freshman- Sophomore Pod B Students Teachers Freshman- Sophomore Pod C Students Teachers
10 Personalization Toolkit - Introduction Personalization Level 5 Small Learning Communities Optimal Conditions for Success Vertically aligned vision of school where a team of teachers wrap around a group of students to support their academic achievement, social-emotional development and vision and dreams, students Multi-year programs emphasized supported through this model Benefits Highest level of relationships due to relationships built between teachers and students creating the opportunity for maximum student social/emotional and academic support Following students over time allows teachers to gain ownership of student success/challenges Thematic approach allows for students to develop their career interests and be college/career focused (works well with CTE) Teacher to teacher relationships built not only across content but across gradelevels Challenges Can be challenging to use existing course offerings (non-cte electives) to develop unique course sequences for small learning communities Teachers will have to teach more than one prep in order to teach their students Requires significant strategic planning and forethought during scheduling Scheduling Guidance* Develop community specific course sequences that the guide course selection Team teachers and students within the house together Develop a master schedule that has teachers teaching the classes needed within their house (will mean teachers will have to teach multiple preps) Create small master schedules that are house specific and then merge them together to create overall master schedule Thematic Small Learning Community A ~ 250 Students (9 th -12 th Grade) ~ Teachers (Teaching Multiple Grade Levels) Thematic Small Learning Community B ~ 250 Students (9 th -12 th Grade) ~ Teachers (Teaching Multiple Grade Levels) Thematic Small Learning Community C ~ 250 Students (9 th -12 th Grade) ~ Teachers (Teaching Multiple Grade Levels) Thematic Small Learning Community D ~ 250 Students (9 th -12 th Grade) ~ Teachers (Teaching Multiple Grade Levels) Thematic Small Learning Community E ~ 250 Students (9 th -12 th Grade) ~ Teachers (Teaching Multiple Grade Levels) Thematic Small Learning Community F ~ 250 Students (9 th -12 th Grade) ~ Teachers (Teaching Multiple Grade Levels)
11 Personalization Toolkit Section 2 Theory of Change
12 Personalization Toolkit SLC Theory of Change Theory of Change for Small Learning Communities High Level The following theory of change articulates the specific causal linkages that are expected to occur from the start of the SLC initiative to goal attainment By programmatically and physically organizing large high schools into multiple, small, vertically aligned groups of students and teachers who remain together throughout students high school careers, Chicago Public Schools Small Learning Communities Initiative will: create supportive, academically enriching school environments; promote productive, collaborative relationships between and among students, teachers, administrators, parents, and community groups; and empower and equip teachers to provide effective, personalized instruction and support to students over time; which, ultimately, will lead to student academic and postsecondary success. Components: There are several key components to effective implementation of SLCs. Together these components reflect comprehensive, well implemented and administered SLCs. The SLC Logic Model illustrates the multiple components of a whole school personalized focus on supporting not only academics but individualized support that meets students where they are. This initial impact fosters a rigorous, enriching, and supportive school climate and culture, and this development in turn translates to student academic and postsecondary success as the final outcome. Well Implemented and Administered SLCs Effective, distributed, empowered leadership within & among SLCs & across the school Under SLCs, teachers have autonomy to personalize instruction and are offered a greater voice in school decisions. This is accomplished by including teachers in discussions regarding school decisions and by emphasizing the value of Common Plan Time and encouraging teachers to use this time to develop ideas and solutions through collaboration. A distributed model of leadership promotes strong relationships among teachers and staff on all levels and contributes to teachers who are empowered to address their students needs and SLC team members who accept ownership and responsibility for student achievement.
13 Personalization Toolkit SLC Theory of Change Weekly advisory for all students Consistent & Effective Use of Common Plan by SLC The focus of advisory is for small group of students to be connected with one adult over the course of the student s high school experience. Because a small group of teachers works with the same students over time, it is easier for an advisor to provide academic and socialemotional support to students, as the advisors are also a part of the same group of teachers. To fully connect with students in an SLC model, each SLC should have a designated area of Schools are physically & the building to the extent possible. This allocation of space also minimizes student organizationally structured as SLCs movement and allows teachers to further connect with students during passing periods. Equally important, close proximately supports the connectedness of teachers with each other in the SLC. Impromptu student support conversations can happen more freely and immediately if necessary. Teachers are expected use this time to share instructional strategies and discuss the individual needs of students. Through SLC common plan time teachers have the opportunity to familiarize themselves with students individual issues and, along with other teachers who have the same students, develop ways of tackling specific concerns. This component of SLCs empowers teachers, gives SLC team members direct responsibility for student achievement. Student data is disaggregated by SLCwhich makes identifying student gaps and providing the necessary supports achievable. It also contributes to secondary impacts of effective implementation, including greater teacher connectedness to SLC and more effective and engaged teachers. Content common plan time is still ongoing and built into the schedule as well. Instructional strategy support to meet students needs Curriculum and supports are vertically aligned & theme based SLC leadership and SLC coaches encourage best practices of instructional strategies and teachers have the opportunity to share effective teaching practices with each other during SLC Common Plan Time. This contributes to greater teacher empowerment to meet students needs and more effective and engaged teaching staff. Because students are looping with teachers for multiple years, identifying specific supports becomes easier and more likely to show impact for each individual SLC. Administration can have supportive conversations with each SLC about the levers of support their students need that may differ from the rest of the building. Ongoing monitoring, evaluation, & support from skilled SLC program leadership gaps and areas with room for improvement. Student programming and scheduling are aligned with SLCs The SLC program leadership is responsible for conducting surveys and focus groups and for running analyses with school data to provide a rigorous evaluation of implementation progress in each school. This will help with solidifying SLC frameworks and ensuring that each component is fully and effectively implemented. Most importantly, surveys inform schools of the progress made towards well implemented SLCs as well as implementation Effective scheduling is responsible for many of the intended impacts and benefits of SLCs, particularly helping teachers in building relationships with their students and personalize learning to the needs of individual students. Students should be regularly scheduled into classes with teachers of the same SLC. This is important to help teachers identify specific academic and social issues that individual students in their SLC face. Consistent, ongoing connections with parents by SLC As teachers are building relationships with students over time, so too are they developing deeper relationships with parents. This is best connected initially through advisory. However, as each SLC evolves an increase in parental support and involvement should be evident.
14 Personalization Toolkit SLC Theory of Change Interim Impacts: Personalized Focus on Student Achievement &Postsecondary Success Resulting Impacts: a. Teachers are empowered to address their students needs b. SLC team members accept ownership and responsibility for student achievement c. Teachers and students work together to set expectations and improve/ accelerate student outcomes d. Intense, data-driven focus by SLC on student gaps and supports necessary for academic achievement and postsecondary success e. Productive relationships between SLCs and students families are formed Rigorous, Enriching, & Supportive School Climate and Culture a. Teachers and students feel connected to their SLCs b. More effective, engaged, and committed teachers, school leaders and other faculty c. Positive school climate; collaborative and supportive relationships among teachers and students d. Schools emphasize academic rigor and postsecondary success through the SLC structure Lasting Outcomes: Student Academic and Postsecondary Success See following pages for graphic layout of the logic model.
15 Personalization Toolkit SLC Theory of Change Well-Implemented SLCs Effective, distributed, empowered leadership within & among SLCs & across the school Student programming and scheduling are aligned with SLCs Instructional strategies and supports to meet students needs Weekly advisory for all students Schools are physically & organizationally structured as SLCs Curricula are vertically aligned & theme based Well Implemented and Administered SLCs Consistent, ongoing connections with parents by SLC Consistent & Effective Use of Common Plan by SLC Ongoing monitoring, evaluation, & support from skilled SLC program leadership
16 Personalization Toolkit SLC Theory of Change Personalized Focus SLC team members accept ownership & responsibility for student achievement Teachers understand and are empowered to address their students individual needs Teachers & students work together to set expectations and improve/accelerate student outcomes Intense, data-driven focus by SLC on student gaps & supports necessary for academic achievement & postsecondary success Personalized Focus on Student Achievement & Postsecondary Success Productive relationships between SLCs & students families are formed
17 Personalization Toolkit SLC Theory of Change Culture, Climate, and Academic Press Teachers & students feel connected to their SLCs More effective engaged, & committed teachers, school leaders & other faculty Positive school climate; collaborative & supportive relationships among teachers and students Rigorous, Enriching, & Supportive School Climate and Culture Schools emphasize academic rigor & postsecondary success through the SLC structure Improved Academic Achievement Postsecondary Success Student Academic and Postsecondary Success
18 Personalization Toolkit Section 3 Implementation Stages
19 Personalization Toolkit Implementation Stages Regardless of the level of personalization a school is going to implement, a year of planning that involves the entire faculty will result in greater depth of understanding regarding everyone s purpose and responsibility for implementation. The stages of implementation outlined in this section are designed for Small Learning Community implementation but can easily be adapted and modified based on the need of the school. One constant that remains throughout all levels and years of implementation is the ability to schedule students and teachers so they are matched with fidelity so that personalization can take place. Small Learning Communities Stages of Implementation Year 5: Sustainability Year 4: Graduation & Postsecondary Enrollment Year 3: Instructional Strategy & Family and Community Focus Year 2: Deepen Alignment of SLC Themes to Postsecondary Education Year 1: Settling of SLC Structure, Building Relationships, Advisory & SLC Data Conversations Year 0: Year of Planning to Transition Building to SLCs Year 0: Year of Planning to Transition Building to SLCs Why? How? Evidence/Indicators? To transitioning a school to a different model is a complex process As the year of planning progresses the level of buy-in increases as everyone starts to understand the benefits of the structure through owning a part of the transition To complete the building transition in one year maintains a high level of energy and excitement around wrapping around a group of students for four years See Planning Year Toolkit Section for complete transition information Identify SLC Transition Leadership Team Use teacher lead Learning Committees to divide the work of transitioning the building Teachers sign up for Learning Committees Weekly support from SLC central office to trouble shoot transition issues School follows a custom Planning Year Timeline developed in collaboration with SLC central office SLC themes are identified and connect with the postsecondary vision of the school All teachers, counselors and administrators are aligned with an SLC All students are aligned with an SLC of their choosing SLC Leads are established and trained to facilitate SLC meetings Advisory curriculum is constructed with focus on youth development, academic & postsecondary planning Teacher and student advisory alignment is by SLC Student schedules are aligned with teachers in their SLC
20 Personalization Toolkit Implementation Stages Year 1: Settling of SLC Structure, Building Relationships, Advisory, SLC Data Driven Conversation Targeted Impact Measures: Attendance, On Track Why? How? Evidence First semester of Year 1 is a time of adjustment to the new structure and implementation advisory To focus on building relationships with students in Year 1 is critical to the success of the structure SLCs need timely, disaggregated data to build interventions for their students Scheduling should be well aligned so students are in the majority of their classes with teachers from their SLC Advisors receive professional development on implementing advisory effectively Administration is visible in classrooms and supportive during advisory Teachers become familiar with the individual socio-emotional and academic issues of students in their SLC Structures are in place so data can be disaggregated by SLC and used for collaborative conversations during SLC Common Plan Time Scheduling match analyzed and at least 35% Advisors and teachers are following curriculum and are intentional in building relationships with their students SLC Common Plan Time is being used to deepen relationships among the SLC teachers and support students By second semester, SLCs are using disaggregated data to affect attendance and On Track measures for all grade levels, in order to design and implement effective student interventions Year 2: Deepen Alignment of SLC Themes to Postsecondary Education Additional Targeted Impact Measures: ACT, Dual/Concurrent Enrollment, FAFSA, Graduation Rate Why? How? Evidence When implemented with fidelity, SLCs are a critical personalization strategy for supporting student postsecondary enrollment and success By engaging students in their future plan beyond high school, their focus becomes sharper during high school SLC themes and identity give opportunities for student to explore their interests Creates a college going culture for all student by expanding dual/concurrent enrollment broadens opportunities for all students to engage in postsecondary success before leaving high school Teachers and advisors continue to build relationships with students, understanding career interests through formal and informal conversations Use SLC Postsecondary Self- Assessment (see Postsecondary section of SLC Toolkit) to build a plan for expanding postsecondary expertise for all teachers in an SLC Course sequencing for each SLC should be aligned with theme for four years Develop SLC theme through career and community connections Develop postsecondary options, in collaboration with counselors, tied to each SLC theme Expand dual enrollment and assess teacher capacity to build concurrent enrollment opportunities in the school SLCs celebrate student achievement Students can verbalize what their SLC theme is and how it links to various postsecondary and career opportunities Teachers are integrating career and postsecondary language of SLC theme into the classroom Students are hearing common language from teachers regarding postsecondary opportunities SLC teachers, advisors and counselors are having conversations with parents regarding postsecondary plans for their student SLCs are using disaggregated data to affect all growth measures
21 Personalization Toolkit Implementation Stages Year 3: Instructional Strategy, Family and Community Focus Why? How? Evidence Due to stronger relationships with shared groups of students, SLC teacher teams will have greater understanding of learning styles and academic needs for individual students SLC teachers should develop instructional strategy tools that will facilitate learning for students based on their academic needs Building relationships with families allows for SLC teachers to further understand how to support students Community relationships will provide opportunities to connect students with SLC themes and career opportunities Teachers build relationships with students to understand how to support their learning Use SLC common plan time to explore and share instructional strategies Continued use of SLC disaggregated data to create interventions drive growth for all students Identify ways that SLCs can draw parents to the school by forming a school-wide parent organization with representation from parents in each SLC Explore community connections already existing with SLC teachers and how to connect them with students Various instructional strategies are used by SLC teachers to close gaps in learning Teachers can articulate each student s career and postsecondary plans Advisors set appointments with parents prior Parent Teacher Conferences, identifying specific ways for parents to support their students and learn about parent s dreams for their student Each SLC has a plan for partnering with parents beyond traditional parentteacher conferences Each SLC executes at least one activity per semester connecting students with career theme exploration Year 4: Graduation & Postsecondary Enrollment Why? How? Evidence Although a focus on graduation and postsecondary enrollment is important from the beginning, this will be the first graduating class that has had a personalized education through SLCs for all four years of high school Celebrate the success students and teachers who have worked together over time Senior data by SLC should drive conversations and supports for students within the SLC Senior advisors will keep SLC informed on senior progress for postsecondary enrollment and potential barriers that need to be addressed Postsecondary opportunities like dual enrollment are driven through SLCs for early college success Year 5: Sustainability Increase in graduation rate Increased FAFSA completion rate Increase in postsecondary enrollment Increase in scholarships awarded Increase in Dual or concurrent enrollment Postsecondary climate is evident and student accomplishments are celebrated in every SLC Why? How? Evidence The SLC structure is a sustainable structure but will not sustain without continued reflection and attention from leadership Five years will just scratch the surface of the benefits derived from sustaining over many years Teachers have worked hard to make the structure work for their students and need to have time to continue to sharpen the design of their SLC and create new solutions for student support All growth measures are continued focus for all subsequent years New initiatives should be evaluated on the basis of whether they can work within the SLC structure and not risk impacting the structure negatively Careful attention each year needs to be given to scheduling so a high match rate is maintained Leadership and SLC Leads should conduct an annual reflective process using the logic model to identify areas of strength and target areas for improvement SLCs is no longer thought of as an initiative but the way we do school Teachers are empowered and supported to seek solutions for their SLC students Reflection and growth goals are a natural part of the SLC evolution SLCs continue to evolve regarding student supports, theme development and postsecondary success Parents and students now understand the benefits of attending an SLC school
Principal Practice Observation Tool
Principal Performance Review Office of School Quality Division of Teaching and Learning Principal Practice Observation Tool 2014-15 The was created as an evidence gathering tool to be used by evaluators
More informationNC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS
STANDARD I: ELEMENT A: Teachers demonstrate leadership Teachers lead in their classroom Developing Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students Accesses
More informationFRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE
FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE S The Framework of Supports are a set of Practice Profiles that serve as an implementation overview of Support for Personalized Learning (SPL). Practice
More informationNCNSP Design Principle 1: Ready for College
College Credit College Ready Skills (High School) Course of Study NCNSP Design Principle 1: Ready for College Students are tracked according to past performance into regular and honors level courses. All
More informationNorth Carolina New Schools Design Principle 1: Ready for College. Beginning Early Steps Growing Innovations New Paradigms
North Carolina New Schools Design Principle 1: Ready for College (High School) Course of Study Students are tracked according to past performance into regular and honors level courses. Students are allotted
More informationFramework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs
THE FRAMEWORK FOR PRINCIPAL PREPARATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 1 Purpose Of all the educational research conducted over the last 30 years in the search to improve student
More information2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric
2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric Exclusive partners with Dr. Robert J. Marzano for the Teacher Evaluation Model and School Leader Evaluation Model Learning Sciences International 175
More informationDRAFT. Denver Plan 2014. Every Child Succeeds
Denver Plan 2014 Every Child Succeeds 100 80 Introduction Every child takes that first step into their first day of school with butterflies and talent, potential and dreams. It s the day that the door
More informationRamp-Up to Readiness is a school-wide guidance program designed to increase the number and diversity of students who graduate from high school with
Ramp-Up to Readiness is a school-wide guidance program designed to increase the number and diversity of students who graduate from high school with the knowledge, skills, and habits necessary for success
More informationThe School Counselor s Role in College and Career Readiness
College and Career Readiness Counseling for All Students 1 The School Counselor s Role in College and Career Readiness Judy Petersen, M. Ed. Director, College and Career Readiness Granite School District
More informationTOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES
Get to Know My RE Observe Collect Evidence Mentor Moments Reflect Review Respond Tailor Support Provide Provide specific feedback specific Feedback What does my RE need? Practice Habits Of Mind Share Data
More informationMaster Scheduling for Inclusive Practices Voices Over
Master Scheduling for Inclusive Practices Voices Over Slide # 1 Master Scheduling for Inclusive Practices Introduction 2 Goals for Inclusive Scheduling 3 Needs Assessment 4 Continuum of Services 5 Organizing
More informationCULTIVATING EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE. Strategic Plan
CULTIVATING EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE 2015 2020 Strategic Plan Dear Hartford Public Schools Community, A strategic plan gives organizations, and communities, permission to believe that great things are possible.
More informationNorth Carolina New Schools Page 1 of 14
Design Principles Overview North Carolina New Schools partners with local school districts and higher education institutions to help secondary schools become nimble, rigorous and focused institutions that
More informationGrowing Tomorrow s Leaders Today Preparing Effective School Leaders in New York State
The New York State Board of Regents and The New York State Education Department Growing Tomorrow s Leaders Today Preparing Effective School Leaders in New York State "The factor that empowers the people
More informationThe 20 Non-Negotiable Characteristics of Higher Performing School Systems
The 20 Non-Negotiable Characteristics of Higher Performing School Systems Aligning District Practices to Support High-Quality Instruction Report Published: April 2011 Authored by: National Center for Educational
More informationTeacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Missouri s Educator Evaluation System Teacher Evaluation Protocol Introduction Missouri s Educator Evaluation System was created and refined by hundreds of educators across the state.
More informationOrange County Small Learning Communities Site Implementation Checklist
Orange County Small Learning Communities Site Implementation Checklist Cohort V, Year 2, 2006-07 OCDE SLC Goals: 1. Increase student academic performance in literacy & mathematics 2. Provide personalized
More informationThe ASCA National Model A National Vision
A National Vision The ASCA National Model establishes a vision of excellence for comprehensive school counseling that is aligned with high standards and high expectations, focused on success for all students
More informationEugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric
Eugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric Using leadership, collaboration and advocacy, the Professional School Counselor plans, delivers, manages and promotes a comprehensive guidance
More informationConceptual Framework. A. Overview and Conceptual framework
Conceptual Framework A. Overview and Conceptual framework 1. Institutional Historical context and unique characteristics When Mankato Normal School was founded in 1868, it served 27 students. In 1921,
More informationWallingford Public Schools Strategic Planning Chart School Name: Adult Education
Wallingford Public Schools Strategic Planning Chart School Name: CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION Guiding Belief: The WPS Learning Community will provide the personal and academic challenges and learning necessary
More informationTulsa Public Schools District Secondary School Counseling Program
Tulsa Public Schools District Secondary School Counseling Program Excellence and High Expectations with a Commitment to All Tulsa School Counseling Program A school counseling program is comprehensive
More informationA Sleeves up Approach 1. Managing Neck Deep: A Sleeves up Approach to Academic Leadership. Presentation Team:
A Sleeves up Approach 1 Managing Neck Deep: A Sleeves up Approach to Academic Leadership Bio: Jennifer Schardt, Faculty Chair Presentation Team: Jennifer Schardt is a full-time faculty member at Central
More informationLeadership Through Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrator and Principals
Possible Guiding Questions Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrators and Principals This document utilizes the components within the Framework for Leadership to provide possible guiding
More informationExecutive Summary. Oregon City Service Learning Academy
Oregon City School District 62 Tim Graham 1306 12th St Oregon City, OR 97045 Document Generated On November 2, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Description of the School 2 School's Purpose 4 Notable
More informationColorado Professional Teaching Standards
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate knowledge of the content they teach a. Teachers provide instruction that is aligned with the Colorado Academic Standards and their
More informationTENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Alternative Education Program Model/Standards Standard 1.0: Mission An exemplary alternative education program operates with a clearly stated mission, a formal set of standards, and a plan for program
More informationKey Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)
Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6) The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in English Language Arts and Mathematics as well as the soon-to-be released Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) require
More informationNortheast K-12 Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling Program
Northeast K-12 Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling Program Foundation Philosophy The foundation of the Northeast School counseling program is developmental and preventative in design for all students.
More informationPREPARING STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER
http://www.k12.wa.us/secondaryeducation/careercollegereadiness/default.aspx Career Guidance is designed to prepare all students for their future with support from a school counselor and/or educator/advisors,
More informationThe Historic Opportunity to Get College Readiness Right: The Race to the Top Fund and Postsecondary Education
The Historic Opportunity to Get College Readiness Right: The Race to the Top Fund and Postsecondary Education Passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and the creation of the Race to
More informationTulsa Public Schools District School Counseling Program Elementary
Tulsa Public Schools District School Counseling Program Elementary Revised 2013 Excellence and High Expectations with a Commitment to All Tulsa School Counseling Program A school counseling program is
More informationA Movement for Inspired Teaching.
SANFORD INSPIRE HANDBOOK A Movement for Inspired Teaching. Changing Lives. Transforming Tomorrow. TEACH INSPIRED. LEARN INSPIRED. LIVE INSPIRED. Every child deserves not one, not two, but many inspirational
More informationSt. Charles School District. Counselor Growth Guide and. Evaluation Documents
St. Charles School District Growth Guide and Evaluation Documents 2014-2015 City of St. Charles School District MISSION The City of St. Charles School District will REACH, TEACH, and EMPOWER all students
More informationCONNECTING CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION WITH THE COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS AGENDA
Introduction Policymakers and educators around the nation are wrestling with an important challenge how to raise expectations for high school achievement, while increasing relevance and engagement in learning
More informationSection Three: Ohio Standards for Principals
Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals 1 Principals help create a shared vision and clear goals for their schools and ensure continuous progress toward achieving the goals. Principals lead the process
More informationTheory of Action Statements - Examples
Theory of Action Statements - Examples E. Robin Staudenmeier, Principal Consultant System of Support and District Intervention Division March 24, 2014 1. Establish specific district wide Goals and Objectives
More informationWisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System Principal Evaluation Process Manual Updated February 2016 This manual is an interim update to remove inaccurate information. A more comprehensive update for 2016-17
More informationGuide to Building A Broad-Based Coalition
Guide to Building A Broad-Based Coalition Supporting the Development and Sustainability of a System of Pathways DISTRICT FRAMEWORK TOOL 1.1.3 As communities across California commit to developing systems
More informationSchool Counselor Performance Standards
West Virginia School Counseling Programs Creating Pathways to Student Success West Virginia School Counselor Performance Standards West Virginia School Counseling Programs Creating Pathways to Student
More informationSchool Leadership Concentration
School Leadership Concentration The School Leadership Concentration (SLC) is designed for aspiring school leaders. Candidates will learn the necessary skills, ranging from financial management to instructional
More informationThe Massachusetts Tiered System of Support
The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Chapter 1: Massachusetts Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Overview Massachusetts has developed a blueprint outlining a single system of supports that is responsive
More informationThe Pathways Innovation Network (PIN): Every Teen with a Dream and Plan
The Pathways Innovation Network (PIN): Every Teen with a Dream and Plan Executive Summary The National Center for College and Career Transitions (NC3T) invites education systems and employer organization
More informationwww.simplyapilgrim.com Program Design for the Internship- Based Youth Ministry Program
Program Design for the Internship- Based Youth Ministry Program Youth ministry is both an ancient and modern phenomenon, where strong Biblical patterns regularly collide with changing cultural and ministry
More informationTechnical Assistance Paper
Pam Stewart Commissioner of Education DPS: 2014-94 Date: August 1, 2014 Technical Assistance Paper What s Special about Special Education? Specially Designed Instruction for Students with Disabilities
More informationJoseph L. McCourt Middle School Cumberland, RI 02864 Servicing students in grades 6 8
Joseph L. McCourt Middle School Cumberland, RI 02864 Servicing students in grades 6 8 Mission Statement: Joseph L. McCourt Middle School (JLMMS) is committed to providing an atmosphere of mutual respect
More informationPennsylvania s Statewide System of School Support
Pennsylvania s Statewide System of School Support The Pennsylvania Department of Education s (PDE) mission is to lead and serve the educational community to enable each individual to grow into an inspired,
More informationwww.simplyapilgrim.com Program Design for the Internship- Based Family Ministry Program
Program Design for the Internship- Based Family Ministry Program Youth ministry is both an ancient and modern phenomenon, where strong Biblical patterns regularly collide with changing cultural and ministry
More informationThe Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool. 1 9-1-11 Final
The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool 1 The Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool The Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool is intended to assist district/schools
More informationSC Cyber Academy. South Carolina Public Charter School District
South Carolina Public Charter School District SC Cyber Academy School Mission: The educational mission of Cyber Academy of South Carolina (CASC) is to provide an individualized standards-based education
More informationRubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist Effective school psychologists are vital members of the education
More informationProfessionals Responsible for Campus Turnaround Plan Development: Name:
Date of Board Grades Served: 6 8 Approval: 5/23/2016 Consecutive School Years Rated Academically Unacceptable/Improvement Required: Dr. Terrence Eaton Ron Gonzales Jonathan Smith Dr. Velma Wilson Diane
More informationIllinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions
Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions The Core Functions and Indicators, which form the structure for the delivery and execution of (Illinois CSI) services, describe the big ideas or
More informationImproving Developmental College Counseling Programs
By Dr. Kevin L. Ensor Improving Developmental College Counseling Programs Utilizing the Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) to Motivate At-Risk Students DR. KEviN L. ENsoR, has more than 20
More informationComprehensive Plan. for. World Class Schools 2013-2018
Comprehensive Plan for World Class Schools 2013-2018 Approved: 10.22.2013 PURPOSE Educating each student to be a thriving citizen MISSION Bend-La Pine Schools, in partnership with our community, will prepare
More informationDesign Specifications. Asset Inventory
DECEMBER 2015 Pathways System Framework Design Specifications and Asset Inventory FOR PATHWAY SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Every Indiana business will find the educated and skilled workforce necessary to compete
More informationArkansas Teaching Standards
Arkansas Teaching Standards The Arkansas Department of Education has adopted the 2011 Model Core Teaching Standards developed by Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) to replace
More informationHow To Write A Curriculum Framework For The Paterson Public School District
DEPARTMENT OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION FRAMEWORK PROLOGUE Paterson s Department of Curriculum and Instruction was recreated in 2005-2006 to align the preschool through grade 12 program and to standardize
More informationThe Summit Country Day School. College Counseling Freshman Handbook
The Summit Country Day School College Counseling Freshman Handbook Overview of The Summit Country Day School College Counseling Team STAFF: Maureen Ferrell Director of College Counseling 513 871-4700 x226
More informationProgram: Educational Administration Masters, Director of Vocational Education
1.3.1 facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by the school. Program: Educational Administration Masters, Director
More informationStandard I: School Counselors demonstrate mastery of and expertise in the domain for which they are responsible
This past year, BVSD Counselors came together and identified effective practices that align with Boulder Valley Educator Effectiveness Standards 1 through 5. The identified connections are not evaluation
More information2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Counselors
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Counselors Definition of an Effective School Counselor Effective school counselors are vital members of the education
More informationSystemic or school wide, coordinated efforts designed to create a climate for learning
Systemic or school wide, coordinated efforts designed to create a climate for learning What is this? A positive school climate is one that evidences norms, values and patterns of behavior that support
More informationOregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Revised for 2014 2015 State Guidelines for ESEA Waiver & SB 290 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 255 Capitol St, NE, Salem, OR
More informationPrinciples to Actions
Principles to Actions Executive Summary In 1989 the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) launched the standards-based education movement in North America with the release of Curriculum and
More informationCalifornia Academic Partnership Program High School Exit Exam Project: Jordan Freshman Academy Annual Report
California Academic Partnership Program High School Exit Exam Project: Jordan Freshman Academy Annual Report Sheila Shea, Research Associate Jordan Horowitz, Project Director October 2003 BACKGROUND AND
More informationMasters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)
1 Educational Leadership & Policy Studies Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014) The comprehensive exam is intended as a final assessment of a student s ability to integrate important
More informationDual Enrollment. Frequently Asked Questions
Dual Enrollment Dual enrollment is a successful acceleration mechanism that allows students to pursue an advanced curriculum relevant to their individual postsecondary interests. Over 37,000 students participated
More informationWV School Counseling Program Audit
The program audit is used to assess the school counseling program in comparison with West Virginia s Model for School Counseling Programs. Audits serve to set the standard for the school counseling program.
More informationCPC Certified Professional CoaCh training Program
Participant Manual CPC Certified Professional CoaCh training Program ICF Accredited Coach Training Program 142 Contact Learning Hours 110 3rd Avenue North, Suite 102 Certified Professional CoaCh training
More informationWest Ranch High School Mission Statement
WEST RANCH HIGH SCHOOL Web Development 1 & 2 Mr. Casey Burrill Web Development Instructor E-mail: cburrill@hartdistrict.org www.wrwebheads.com (661) 222-1220, ext. 513 West Ranch High School Mission Statement
More informationHigher Education Committee P-12 Education Committee. John L. D Agati. Ken Slentz. School Counseling Regulations. Date: October 18, 2013
THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234 To: From: Higher Education Committee P-12 Education Committee John L. D Agati Ken Slentz Subject: School Counseling
More informationHolland Elementary School Local Stakeholder Group Recommendations to the Commissioner Submitted January 6, 2014
Holland Elementary School Local Stakeholder Group Recommendations to the Commissioner Submitted January 6, 2014 Holland Elementary School was designated by Commissioner Chester as chronically underperforming
More informationRubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School Counselors Standard 1: school counselors demonstrate leadership, advocacy, and collaboration. Professional
More informationDRAFT For use in 2012-13 validation process only Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School Counselors Standard 1: school counselors demonstrate leadership, advocacy, and collaboration. Professional
More informationGarden City Public Schools Strategic Plan. Vision: Student Focused Team Driven Globally Competitive with a Hometown Spirit
Garden City Public Schools Strategic Plan Mission: Our mission is to be a learning community that ensures a safe, caring, quality education for students of all ages to prepare for the possibilities of
More informationY.E.S. (Youth Education Scholars) to Higher Education
Y.E.S. (Youth Education Scholars) to Higher Education 2012-2013 End of Year Report Sherri L. Brooks, MSW Program Manager Ashley M. Matysiak, MSW Program Coordinator 1 P age Table of Contents Introduction
More informationStrategic Planning as an Iterative and Integrated Process NACUBO Conference
Strategic Planning as an Iterative and Integrated Process NACUBO Conference September 22, 2014 2014 Plan A Advisors Session Goals Through a case study of the Strategic Planning Process conducted with Pratt
More informationwww.simplyapilgrim.com Program Design for the Internship- Based Urban Ministry Program
Program Design for the Internship- Based Urban Ministry Program The 2009 US Census states there are almost 310 million people living in America today. Of them, 222 million (71.6%) live in an urban (population
More informationSchool Strategic Plan for Highvale Secondary College 7918 2016-2019
School Strategic Plan for Highvale Secondary College 7918 2016-2019 Endorsement by School Principal Signed Name Ian Watkins Date 15 September 2015 Endorsement by School Council Signed Name Fred Butcher
More informationThe Common Core and Role of Guidance & Counseling
The Common Core and Role of Guidance & Counseling G E A R U P W E S T C O N F E R E N C E S E P T E M B E R 3 0, 2 0 1 3 M I K E H U B E R T, D I R E C T O R D A N I S E A C K E L S O N, S U P E R V I
More informationFramework for Leadership
Framework for Leadership Date Leader Self-Assessment Evaluator Assessment Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural Leadership Principals/school leaders systemically and collaboratively develop a positive culture to
More informationStudent Achievement and School Accountability Programs (SASA) Monitoring Plan for School Improvement Grants October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011
Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs (SASA) Monitoring Plan for School Improvement Grants October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011 January 12, 2011 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION...
More informationAbout the Finalist. Cumberland County Schools North Carolina DISTRICT PROFILE
About the Finalist Cumberland County Schools North Carolina DISTRICT PROFILE Superintendent Dr. Frank Till became superintendent in June 2009, after leading the Boys & Girls Clubs in Broward County, Fla.,
More informationCALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)
Education Code section 44270.5 allows an examination alternative to the Administrative Services preparation program as long as the examination is aligned with the current Administrative Services Program
More informationHolyoke Public Schools Local Stakeholder Group (LSG)
Holyoke Public Schools Local Stakeholder Group (LSG) Meeting 4, June 17, 3-6 PM Picknelly Adult & Family Education Center Agenda for Today Welcome Review of 6/10 meeting notes Review of meeting norms Secondary
More informationNorth Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction
North Carolina TEACHER evaluation process Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers ( This form should be
More informationCrosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the
Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the Equivalent in the Performance Based Principal Licensure Standards (current principal standards)
More informationDanbury High School. Student Support Framework
Danbury High School Student Support Framework Tier 1: Universal Supports Student Tutoring Center (STC): Students may access and use the STC during any free period to complete projects, study for tests/quizzes
More informationFAQs: SLC movement at Castle High School. General SLC questions submitted by parents:
FAQs: SLC movement at Castle High School General SLC questions submitted by parents: Q: Where can parents obtain information on small learning communities and the model that Castle plans to roll out with
More informationDual Enrollment. Frequently Asked Questions. General
Dual Enrollment Dual enrollment is an acceleration mechanism that allows students to pursue an advanced curriculum relevant to their individual postsecondary interests. Each year, over 50,000 students
More informationWe are looking for bright, creative and energetic leaders to join us as we help shape the future of education in Delaware.
MOT Charter is a small school on a mission to provide a cutting edge learning experience to motivated learners. Teachers at MOT Charter have a passion for learning and are an integral part of a school
More informationACS WASC Accreditation Status Determination Worksheet
ACS WASC Accreditation Status Determination Worksheet How are students achieving? Is the school doing everything possible to support high achievement for all its students? Directions 1. Discuss the evidence
More informationPossible Guiding Questions: Strategic Discussions between Supervising Administrators and Curriculum & Instruction Supervisors
Strategic Discussions between Supervising Administrators and Curriculum & Instruction Supervisors This document utilizes the components within the Framework for Leadership to provide possible guiding questions
More informationWilliam S. Hutchings College & Career Academy STRATEGIC SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
William S. Hutchings College & Career Academy STRATEGIC SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Strategic Goal 1: Student Achievement Objective 1: Increase Content Mastery Initiative: To increase content mastery in grades
More informationCarbondale Community High School District 165 Restructuring Plan
Background: Carbondale Community High School District 165 Restructuring Plan Carbondale Community High School has a history of strong academic programs and successful student performance. However the PSAE
More informationKansas Multi-Tier System of Support
Kansas Multi-Tier System of Support MTSS is a coherent continuum of evidence based, system-wide practices to support a rapid response to academic and behavioral needs, with frequent data-based monitoring
More informationOhio Standards for School Counselors
Adopted by state board of education of ohio October, Ohio Standards for School Counselors Ohio Standards for School Counselors ii Contents Section I: Overview of the Ohio Standards for School Counselors...
More information'NCTSC. ~ The Education Trust's. Center for Transforming School Counseling
~ The Education Trust's 'NCTSC National Center for Transforming School Counseling Professional Development for School Counselors School counselors and what they do are topics conspicuously missing from
More information