S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
|
|
- Shavonne Walsh
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the complaint of ) RESSCO, LLC, d/b/a SG MANAGEMENT, and ) Case No. STAFFORD HOLDINGS, INC., against DTE GAS ) COMPANY. ) ) At the September 26, 2014 meeting of the Michigan Public Service Commission in Lansing, Michigan. PRESENT: Hon. John D. Quackenbush, Chairman Hon. Greg R. White, Commissioner Hon. Sally A. Talberg, Commissioner ORDER On February 27, 2013, RESSCO, LLC, d/b/a SG Management (RESSCO), and Stafford Holdings, Inc. (Stafford Holdings), filed a complaint against DTE Gas Company (DTE Gas). Stafford Holdings owns and operates an apartment complex referred to as Chicago Apartments that is located in the City of Detroit. RESSCO is a property management company that manages this particular property for Stafford Holdings, as well as managing other properties not owned by Stafford Holdings. The complaint alleges that DTE Gas improperly transferred outstanding balances from properties managed by RESSCO, but not owned by Stafford Holdings, to the Chicago Apartments account and improperly threatened to shut off service on two occasions to the Chicago Apartments account.
2 A prehearing conference was held on June 13, 2013, before Administrative Law Judge Richard A. Patterson (ALJ) in order to set a schedule for the rest of the proceedings. DTE Gas, RESSCO, Stafford Holdings, and the Commission Staff (Staff) appeared at the conference. An evidentiary hearing was held on October 15, DTE Gas, RESSCO, Stafford Holdings, and the Staff appeared at the hearing. Complainants presented the testimony of Shawn Stafford, an employee of RESSCO, 1 and eight exhibits in support of their position. Mr. Stafford testified that in January 2011 and March 2011, he received the natural gas bill for the Chicago Apartments account and noticed that outstanding balances from several other properties had been transferred to the Chicago Apartments account. He testified that RESSCO was the property manager for the other properties, but did not have any ownership interest in the properties. Mr. Stafford outlined what duties RESSCO was required to perform as property manager. Mr. Stafford explained that RESSCO established utility accounts for the Chicago Apartments on behalf of Stafford Holdings. He explained further that when the accounts were set up, it was made clear to DTE Gas who the customer was, who the property owner was, and that although RESSCO was not the property owner, the bills should be sent to RESSCO because as the property manager and agent, it would be collecting the funds from tenants and remitting payment for the utility services. Mr. Stafford went on to explain how the bank account used to pay the bills was set up with Stafford Holdings as the owner of the account, and RESSCO being authorized to deposit funds and write checks against the account to pay bills. Mr. Stafford reiterated that RESSCO was the management company, not the property owner for any of the properties in question. He testified that in late 2010 or 2011, a receiver was appointed 1 Throughout the record, the parties describe the property management company as either RESSCO or SG Management. For consistency, the Commission will refer to the property management company as RESSCO. Page 2
3 for the properties whose balances were transferred to the Chicago Apartments account and once the receiver was appointed, the receiver took over management duties for those properties. Mr. Stafford stated that DTE Gas was notified that the receiver was taking over the properties and clarified that at no time was the receiver appointed over RESSCO. Mr. Stafford also testified that he provided the receiver with the shut-off notices from DTE Gas and made sure that the receiver was aware that there was an issue with the properties unpaid DTE Gas bills. Regarding the transferred balances, Mr. Stafford testified that RESSCO immediately notified DTE Gas that the transfers were in error because Stafford Holdings had no affiliation with the other properties. DTE Gas presented the testimony of Inez Chavez, an analyst in DTE Gas Consumer Hearings Department, and 45 exhibits in support of its position. Ms. Chavez testified that she was personally involved in RESSCO s complaint process and explained the steps DTE Gas took to resolve the complaint. DTE Gas claims that RESSCO was the customer of record for all of the accounts in question and provided bills showing that the bills were addressed to RESSCO, not the various property owners. DTE Gas argues that because RESSCO was the customer of record on all of the accounts, the transfers to the Chicago Apartments account were proper. Ms. Chavez testified that throughout the time period in question, a representative of RESSCO was always the contact person for all the accounts involved. Ms. Chavez further testified that Mr. Stafford contacted DTE Gas when other properties were in danger of having their utility service shut off. She also stated that in November 2010, DTE Gas received correspondence notifying them that neither RESSCO nor Stafford Holdings were responsible for the non-chicago Apartments accounts, asking that RESSCO be removed from the accounts, and providing the name of the proper responsible party. Ms. Chavez testified that in March 2012, DTE Gas received notice that a receiver was appointed for properties other than the Chicago Apartments, that those properties had Page 3
4 been sold, and that service should be put in the new owners names. Ms. Chavez also sponsored several exhibits, including requests made by RESSCO to alter accounts, showing that RESSCO was the customer of record for all of the accounts in question. Ms. Chavez also testified regarding her interactions with RESSCO s attorney regarding the informal hearing process and her understanding of the rule regarding transfers of balances in non-residential accounts. RESSCO, Stafford Holdings, DTE Gas, and the Staff submitted written closing arguments on November 21, On January 23, 2014, the ALJ issued a Proposal for Decision (PFD) in which he found that DTE Gas did not produce any evidence to counter the complainants testimony and evidence showing that the accounts were set up with RESSCO as the agent of Stafford Holdings and not the owner or ultimate consumer of the utility services. The ALJ found persuasive the fact that the bills were consistently addressed to RESSCO at its corporate address instead of the various service addresses and that all the checks used to pay the bills indicated that RESSCO was an agent of Stafford Holdings. The ALJ also found persuasive the fact that DTE Gas did not produce documents showing that its normal procedure for setting up accounts, including asking for positive identification of the entity requesting service (such as a tax identification number) and entering that information on the Responsibility Tab in its database, was followed. The ALJ found that the balance transfers to the Chicago Apartments account were not appropriate and that complainants proved by a preponderance of evidence that RESSCO provided DTE Gas with sufficient information to correctly identify the customer of each account. The ALJ recommended that the Commission find that the transfers were not proper. The ALJ provided the parties an opportunity to file exceptions by February 13, 2014, and if necessary, replies to exceptions. Page 4
5 On February 13, 2014, DTE Gas filed exceptions. DTE Gas reiterated its argument that RESSCO was its customer for all the properties in question, not the property owners. DTE Gas argues that per the rules, the term customer means the purchaser, not the end user of the service. DTE Gas also points out that some of Mr. Stafford s testimony regarding when an account was set up was inaccurate and argues his testimony was given too much weight by the ALJ. DTE Gas argues that Mr. Stafford s testimony was misleading in that not all of the checks remitted to pay utility bills identified RESSCO as an agent of Stafford Holdings and those that do identify RESSCO as an agent, identify RESSCO as an agent for an entity named Small Properties LLC, an entity unknown to DTE Gas. DTE Gas argues that the documents and testimony presented by complainants do not establish the companies involved were unrelated. Rather, DTE Gas asserts that the documents and testimony presented by DTE Gas establish that the companies involved were related. DTE Gas argues further that one of its representatives instructed RESSCO on how to transfer an account to another entity so that entity would be considered the customer instead of RESSCO. DTE Gas alleges that because RESSCO continued to receive bills in its name for all properties in question and did not provide any documentation or request any different billing treatment, RESSCO should be considered the customer and therefore, the balances transferred to the Chicago Apartments account were proper. DTE Gas argues that the Staff statement that DTE Gas did not properly reply to discovery requests, the Staff s misstatement of a discovery request, and the Staff s reliance on that misstatement misled the ALJ. Finally, DTE Gas asserts that the PFD is unlawful, unjust, and contrary to the evidence on the record. On February 27, 2014, complainants filed replies to DTE Gas exceptions. According to RESSCO and Stafford Holdings, the owner of the property, not its management company, should be considered the customer and the ultimate purchaser of the utility service for the purposes of Page 5
6 1999 AC, R (4) (Rule 25(4)) of the Commission s Billing Practices Applicable to Non- Residential Electric and Gas Customers. Following this theory, RESSCO and Stafford Holdings allege that outstanding bills for properties managed by RESSCO but not owned by Stafford Holdings should not have been transferred to the Chicago Apartments account and by transferring the outstanding bills to the Chicago Apartments account, DTE Gas violated Rule 25(4). They argue that the ALJ properly applied the definition of customer and interpreted the evidence presented at the hearing, and therefore, properly determined that each apartment complex, not the property manager, was DTE Gas customer. They point out that the ALJ found that RESSCO met its burden of proof in showing which entity should be considered the customer and that DTE Gas exceptions are mostly reiterations of arguments already heard and rejected by the ALJ. They reiterate the argument that DTE Gas had several opportunities to collect the outstanding balances from the properties and failed to take advantage of these opportunities. RESSCO and Stafford Holdings argue that DTE Gas has provided no basis to reverse the PFD and the ALJ s recommendation should be upheld. On February 28, 2014, the Staff filed replies to DTE Gas exceptions. The Staff points out that DTE Gas did not request that the Commission pierce the corporate veil and hold RESSCO responsible for the outstanding bills until DTE Gas written closing argument. The Staff also points out that RESSCO and Stafford Holdings met their burden of proof and DTE Gas did not provide evidence to refute it. Discussion After careful consideration of the facts presented at the hearing, the Commission concludes that it should adopt the findings and recommendations of the ALJ. It has long been the law in this state that the findings of an administrative law judge, albeit not controlling on the Commission Page 6
7 under all circumstances, may be afforded due weight when they bear on the credibility of the witnesses. MERC v Detroit Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 393 Mich 116; 223 NW2d 283 (1974). The rationale for giving due weight to an ALJ s assessment of the witnesses testimony is that, unlike the Commission that reviews a cold record, the ALJ actually observes the demeanor of the witnesses during the hearing, and is better positioned to make credibility determinations. The Commission reviewed the record, agrees with the reasoning of the ALJ, and finds that DTE Gas should be ordered to remove the transferred amounts and any corresponding fees from the Chicago Apartments account as requested by the complainants. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the relief requested in the complaint of RESSCO, LLC, d/b/a SG Management, and Stafford Holdings, Inc., against DTE Gas Company is granted, and the utility shall promptly remove all amounts transferred to the complainants account under 1999 AC, R (4) and all corresponding fees from the Chicago Apartments account. The Commission reserves jurisdiction and may issue further orders as necessary. Page 7
8 Any party desiring to appeal this order must do so in the appropriate court within 30 days after issuance and notice of this order under MCL MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION John D. Quackenbush, Chairman Greg R. White, Commissioner By its action of September 26, Sally A. Talberg, Commissioner Mary Jo Kunkle, Executive Secretary Page 8
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter, on the Commission s own motion, ) to commence a collaborative for the creation of ) a gas choice price
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) VOIP TELECOM, LLC, for a temporary and ) permanent license to provide basic local
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the complaint of ) DOMINION MIDWEST ENERGY, INC., and ) DOMINION RESERVES, INC., against ) Case No.
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) CLOVERLAND ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ) for authority to implement its power supply
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the complaint of ) MICHIGAN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ) ASSOCIATION AND CHARTER COMMUNICA- ) TIONS
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services Human Capital, LLC, Petitioner, v Case No.
More information: SCHOOL ETHICS COMMISSION
: IN THE MATTER : BEFORE THE : SCHOOL ETHICS COMMISSION OF : : Docket No.: C11-03 WILLIAM PATTERSON : SOMERDALE BOARD OF EDUCATION : DECISION CAMDEN COUNTY : : PROCEDURAL HISTORY The above matter arises
More informationOrder No.2014-005 Docket No. BE-13-10-039 IN THE MATTER OF BEFORE THE BANKING GONZALEZ FUNERAL HOME;
Order No.2014-005 Docket No. BE-13-10-039 IN THE MATTER OF BEFORE THE BANKING GONZALEZ FUNERAL HOME; GONZALEZ FAMILY FUNERAL HOME, LLC; GONZALEZ-RIVERA FUNERAL HOME OF EDINBURG, LLC; COMMISSIONER OF TEXAS
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Bureau of Health Services, Petitioner v Marie L. Falquet, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1297 Agency No.
More informationIntroduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665.
Introduction On January 1, 2000, California's Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (Government Code sections 8547 et seq.) was significantly amended. The Legislature amended this law to strengthen protections
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Bureau of Health Services, Petitioner v Karen Elizabeth Kloker, LPN, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1592
More informationEMPLOYEES GUIDE TO APPEALING A WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIM DENIAL
EMPLOYEES GUIDE TO APPEALING A WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIM DENIAL Appeals of workers compensation claim denials are handled by the Labor Commission s Adjudication Division. If you disagree with the claim
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION LABOR RELATIONS DIVISION
STATE OF MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION LABOR RELATIONS DIVISION In the Matter of: LANSING SCHOOL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Labor Organization-Respondent, -and- Case No. CU14 B-005 Docket No. 14-002670-MERC
More informationComplaint Hearings at the Maryland dinsurance Administration. Joy Hatchette Associate Commissioner Consumer Education & Advocacy September 2011
Complaint Hearings at the Maryland dinsurance Administration i i Joy Hatchette Associate Commissioner Consumer Education & Advocacy September 2011 1 Who Has The Right To A Hearing Section 2-210(a)(2) of
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) CMS MARKETING, SERVICES AND TRADING ) COMPANY for a certificate of public convenience
More information7.3 PREHEARING CONFERENCES AND SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES
7.3 PREHEARING CONFERENCES AND SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES 7.3.1 Prehearing Conferences A contested case is commenced when the notice of and order for hearing or other authorized pleading is served by the agency.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services Office of Financial and Insurance Services,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BRONSON HEALTH CARE GROUP, INC., d/b/a BRONSON METHODIST HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION March 15, 2016 9:05 a.m. v No. 324847 Kalamazoo Circuit Court
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CARL C. WEBSTER ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 233,685 CORBIN FISH FARM ) Respondent ) AND ) ) FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE ) Insurance
More informationCity of Miami. City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www. miamigov. corn. INeuhr _611di[G. J>Jf ^ ^^1 ^ 'l^^l^ Meeting Minutes
City of Miami City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www. miamigov. corn INeuhr _611di[G J>Jf ^ ^^1 ^ 'l^^l^ ^ Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 5, 2010 10:00 AM Commission Chambers Civil Service
More informationGeneral complaint form for video/cable customers
Michigan Public Service Commission Formal Video/Cable Complaint General complaint form for video/cable customers I Want to File a Formal Complaint First, you must attempt to resolve your complaint directly
More informationOF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
PT 11-22 Tax Type: Issue: Property Tax Charitable Ownership/Use STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS SAFE PASSAGE, INC. Docket No: 10 PT 0067 Real
More informationJUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961
JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS IN THE MATTER OF THE RENEWAL APPLICATION OF: Arizona Valley Roofing Inc. License No. K-.01-D. No. 01A-1-ROC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 HEARING:
More informationFREEDOM RING COMMUNICATIONS, LLC d/b/a BAYRING COMMUNICATIONS
FREEDOM RING COMMUNICATIONS, LLC d/b/a BAYRING COMMUNICATIONS Complaint of Freedom Ring Communications, LLC d/b/a BayRing Communications against Verizon, New Hampshire Re: Access Charges Procedural Order
More informationThe Non-Lawyers Guide to Hearings before the State Engineer
The Non-Lawyers Guide to Hearings before the State Engineer The information provided here contains general information about how to represent yourself in a hearing. This information is to help you prepare
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL FINAL OPINION AND JUDGMENT
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL EBI-Detroit, Inc., Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 382224 Assessment No. Q340074
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #04-0167 OPINION
SANDY C. PATTERSON, PLAINTIFF, 2005 ACO #8 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #04-0167 BEACON SERVICES, INCORPORATED AND ZURICH-AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of XXXXX XXXXX, Petitioner v Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, Respondent / Docket No. 2001-407 Agency
More informationMaintaining Accredited Status
Progress Reports Significant Program Changes The Accreditation Commission reserves the right to request information regarding a program s compliance with Council for Interior Design Accreditation (CIDA)
More informationIn the United States Court of Federal Claims
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 00-341V (Filed August 6, 2003) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NANCY R. HILLIARD, for OWEN S. HILLIARD, a minor, National Childhood
More informationFILED AUG -5 2013. JOHN BARRETT Clerk of Circuit Court PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED PRE-TRIAL REPORT
STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MILWAUKEE COUNTY BRANCH 41 WYNDHAM PROPERTIES, LLC, and MARK E. CARSTENSEN CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC. a/k/a MARK E. CARSTENSEN CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiffs, V.
More informationA New Headache For Employers: Whistleblower Claims Under the Affordable Care Act
March 2013 A New Headache For Employers: Whistleblower Claims Under the Affordable Care Act BY STEPHEN H. HARRIS, MELINDA A. GORDON & MARC E. BERNSTEIN INTRODUCTION On February 22, 2013, the United States
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) LIBERTY POWER DELAWARE LLC ) for approval of a renewable energy plan to ) Case
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 10-CV-769. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (CAC2807-05)
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 7050.06 April 17, 2015 IG DoD SUBJECT: Military Whistleblower Protection References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This directive reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 7050.06
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) LIBERTY POWER DELAWARE, LLC, ) Case No. for a license as an alternative electric
More informationBasic Virginia Divorce Procedures. By: Richard J. Byrd
Basic Virginia Divorce Procedures By: Richard J. Byrd Basic Virginia Divorce Procedure By: Richard J. Byrd * The formal requirements to obtain a divorce in Virginia are basically the same for a contested
More informationSTATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Patricia L. Acampora, Chairwoman Maureen F. Harris Robert E. Curry, Jr. Cheryl A. Buley STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION At a session of the Public Service Commission
More informationLICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO
LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION CITY OF CHICAGO Rafael Zavala, Inc. ) Rafael Zavala, President ) Licensee/Revocation ) for the premises located at ) Case No. 10 LA 43 4218 South Archer Avenue ) ) v. ) ) Department
More informationBOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS For the purpose of facilitating disciplinary hearings and related proceedings that are conducted pursuant to Rule V of
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2012 UT 53 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH In the Matter of the Discipline of FRANKLIN RICHARD BRUSSOW FRANKLIN
More informationA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM
A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MICHIGAN S ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SYSTEM HISTORY Michigan s system for attorney discipline has existed in its current form since 1978. With the creation of the State Bar of Michigan
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION LABOR RELATIONS DIVISION
STATE OF MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION LABOR RELATIONS DIVISION In the Matter of: MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Labor Organization-Respondent, -and- Case No. CU15 J-034 Docket No. 15-056379-MERC
More informationSTATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING In re: J.H.S. Moxie Corp., and Jacqueline O Shaughnessy, Respondent. * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 STIPULATED
More informationv. STATE BOARD BOARD OF EDUCATION, Appellee Opinion No. 04-33 OPINION
DALLAS CROSBY, Appellant BEFORE THE MARYLAND v. STATE BOARD ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, OF EDUCATION Appellee Opinion No. 04-33 OPINION This is the appeal of the decision of the local board
More informationGeneral Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case
General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case Idaho Industrial Commission PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0041 Telephone: (208) 334-6000 Fax: (208) 332-7558 www.iic.idaho.gov
More informationPatricia Clarey, President; Richard Costigan, and Lauri Shanahan, DECISION. This case is before the State Personnel Board (SPB or the Board) after the
MICHAEL BAYLISS v. SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY Appeal from Dismissal BOARD DECISION AND ORDER (Precedential) No. 13-02 October 24, 2013 APPEARANCES: Hubert Lloyd, Labor Relations Representative, CSUEU,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of John Allen Fuller, C.N.A., Petitioner v Bureau of Health Professions, Respondent / Docket No. 2004-100 Agency
More informationState of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW FINAL DECISION OAL DKT. NO. HEA 07162-14 AGENCY DKT. NO. HESAA JAMES C. DOUGHERTY, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENT ASSISTANCE AUTHORITY,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2014 WI 48 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Geneva E. McKinley, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Geneva
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Filed 8/27/14 Tesser Ruttenberg etc. v. Forever Entertainment CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, d/b/a ) SPIRIT ENERGY 76, for increased allowable
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #95-0724 OPINION
CAROLYN A. ASH, PLAINTIFF, 1998 OPINION #238 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET #95-0724 TECHNICOLOR, INCORPORATED, AND ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.
More informationr- PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
.P- r/ :-4* r- PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION - *- OF WEST VIRGINIA p ::',,.\ - L. --- e : I. 0401 15coma070804.wpd. \. At a session of the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA in the City of Charleston
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION KIMBERLY OWEN ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,050,199 MARKIN GROUP ) Respondent ) AND ) ) STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY )
More informationST ATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND. Plaintiffs, Case No. 2014-139417-CZ
ST ATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND JEFFREY FAYCURRY, et al, v Plaintiffs, Case No. 2014-139417-CZ Hon. Wendy Potts RICHARD LaLONDE, et al, Consolidated with 2014-139488-CK
More informationDepartment of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD. Civil Remedies Division
Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD Civil Remedies Division M. Dwight Evans, Petitioner, v. Social Security Administration. Docket No. C-14-552 Decision No. CR3143 Date:
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * ) to create a gas choice price comparison website for ) Case No. U-17580 use by customers of all regulated gas utilities.
More informationRULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-2-15 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-2-15 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND TABLE OF CONTENTS 0800-2-15-.01 Definitions 0800-2-15-.10 Representation
More informationPROCEDURAL HISTORY. 1 Atlantic Associates also complained against Mr. Curtis Lackland alleging that his proposal for the position of
ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES : Before the School INSURANCE AGENCY : Ethics Commission : V. : : Docket No.: C21-98 JOHN PAGE, JUANITA HYMAN : and OLIVIA CALDWELL, : PLEASANTVILLE BOARD OF ED. : DECISION ATLANTIC
More informationCRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION COMMISSION - GUAM OPERATIONAL RULES AND REGULATIONS
CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION COMMISSION - GUAM OPERATIONAL RULES AND REGULATIONS [Prepared by the Office of the Attorney General of Guam in coordination and with approval of the Criminal Injuries Compensation
More informationHow To Convict A Woman Of Fraud In A Bench Trial
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED May 26, 2015 v No. 312070 Wayne Circuit Court SAMER NASSIB ZAHR, LC No. 11-008606-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE
Link to Final Agency Decision OAH Docket No. 3-1005-16498-2 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE In the Matter of Christopher Douglas Dorpat, Real Estate
More informationFinancial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge:
Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationMICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION FORMAL COMPLAINT
MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION FORMAL COMPLAINT I WANT TO FILE A COMPLAINT Try to resolve your complaint directly with the company in question. The company's customer service number should be listed
More informationDepartment of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD. Civil Remedies Division
Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD Civil Remedies Division Scott Christie, Psy.D. (OI File No. H-12-42635-9) Petitioner, v. The Inspector General. Docket No. C-14-88 Decision
More informationNO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
05/23/2014 "See News Release 028 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM Pursuant to Supreme
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
M.R. 3140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Order entered February 16, 2011. (Deleted material is struck through and new material is underscored.) Effective immediately, Supreme Court Rules
More informationCase 2:04-cv-01053-HGB-DEK Document 190 Filed 07/25/07 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO.
Case 2:04-cv-01053-HGB-DEK Document 190 Filed 07/25/07 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 04-1053 EDUCATION MANAGEMENT,
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2011-31 UNITED STATES TAX COURT DELMAR P. THOMPSON, Petitioner v.
More informationSECURING A STAY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
SECURING A STAY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS By: Kenneth E. Prather, Sr. KENNETH E. PRATHER, SR.,P.C., 19846 Mack Avenue Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236 Phone: 313-884-5622/313-884-6073 (Fax) Email:kprather@quixnet.net
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER JOAN A LARDY, ) MARY A. MOORE, ) KAROLINA S. GANTCHAR, ) FOR AND ON BEHALF
More informationHowHow to Find the Best Online Stock Market
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2007 CA 0424 EVELYN SCHILLING LAWRENCE CONLEA Y RONALD CONLEAY NELDA CARROL AND BETTY VERRET t 01 VERSUS GRACE HEALTH
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS TROY COSMETIC CENTER MARKETING, L.L.C., RENAISSANCE AMBULATORY CENTER, and DR. AENEAS GUINEY, UNPUBLISHED June 1, 2006 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v No. 266909 Oakland Circuit
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 14-60087 Document: 00512938717 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/18/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED February 18, 2015 SUPERIOR
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals No. 13-1186 For the Seventh Circuit IN RE: JAMES G. HERMAN, Debtor-Appellee. APPEAL OF: JOHN P. MILLER Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
More informationU.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Hearing: Paper No. 93 August 4, 1999 PTH THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB MARCH 30, 00 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Portable
More informationUnited States Bankruptcy Court Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division. Transmittal Sheet for Opinions for Posting
United States Bankruptcy Court Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division Transmittal Sheet for Opinions for Posting Will this order be Published? Yes Bankruptcy Caption: Morris Senior Living, LLC,
More informationHearings and Appeals. Your Right to Appeal under Food Stamps (SNAP), TANF, Refugee Cash Assistance and Medicaid/Hoosier Healthwise
Hearings and Appeals Your Right to Appeal under Food Stamps (SNAP), TANF, Refugee Cash Assistance and Medicaid/Hoosier Healthwise If you believe there is an excessive delay in the processing of your application
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
CA2605342 OAH Docket No. STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE In the Matter of Data Line Credit NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR HEARING, Corporation ORDER FOR PREHEARING
More informationCivil Suits: The Process
Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BOARD OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS AND MAINTENANCE & ALTERATION CONTRACTORS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BOARD OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS AND MAINTENANCE & ALTERATION CONTRACTORS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH, Docket No. 2003-1425 BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL
More informationCLINTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION RULES OF PROCEDURE
CLINTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION RULES OF PROCEDURE The Board of Revision hereby enacts the following as its Rules of Procedure pursuant to the Ohio Revised Code (ORC) 5715.02 et seq. and HB294 323.66.
More informationAppeal of Diane Pierce, Docket #2010 T 013 New Hampshire Department of Employment Security. November 4, 2010
PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD 25 Capitol Street Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Telephone (603) 271-3261, Docket #2010 T 013 New Hampshire Department of Employment Security November 4, 2010 The New Hampshire Personnel
More informationT.C. Memo. 2013-187 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. STAFFMORE, LLC, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2013-187 UNITED STATES TAX COURT STAFFMORE, LLC, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 13101-12. Filed August 15, 2013. respondent. Thomas J. Profy IV and John
More informationCOURT S INSTRUCTIONS TO THE JURY (CIVIL) SEXUAL HARASSMENT. I will now explain to you the rules of law that you must follow and apply in
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA KEYBOARD()DIVISION KEYBOARD(), Plaintiff, v. KEYBOARD(), Defendants. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] CV Members of the Jury: COURT S INSTRUCTIONS
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2004-30 UNITED STATES TAX COURT JOHN WILLIAM HOLLIS, Petitioner,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON. LANCE A. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY STANDARDS AND TRAINING, Respondent.
FILED: November, 01 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON LANCE A. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY STANDARDS AND TRAINING, Respondent. Office of Administrative Hearings 0 A
More informationPART ONE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (60 minutes)
PART ONE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (60 minutes) ANSWER THE QUESTIONS IN THIS PART OF THE EXAMINATION IN ANSWER BOOK/S SEPARATE FROM THE ANSWER BOOK/S CONTAINING ANSWERS TO OTHER PARTS OF THE EXAMINATION Question
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
OAH 7-1005-22621-2 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE In the Matter of Nationwide Solutions, David Newman and Mitch Matthews FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKER S COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET # 97-0468 OPINION
DOROTHY KRAUSE, PLAINTIFF, 1999 ACO #207 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKER S COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET # 97-0468 MEDICAL EVALUATIONS SPECIALISTS AND ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.
More informationTown Taxpayers - Appraisal & Property Analysis
Frank P. Crivello/ Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Town of Milford Docket Nos.: 11615-91-PT and 12895-92-PT and 13956-93-PT DECISION The "Taxpayers" appeal, pursuant to RSA 76:16-a, the "Town's"
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD DECISION OF MEDICARE APPEALS COUNCIL
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD DECISION OF MEDICARE APPEALS COUNCIL In the case of Claim for Supplementary Medical Robert Markman M.D. Insurance Benefits (Part B) (Appellant)
More informationADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE MATTER OF: Joel L. Gillespie, Thomas G. Carls, Carls Financial Group, Bridgewater, Inc. Respondents. ORDER TO CEASE
More informationState of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW FINAL DECISION OAL DKT. NO. HEA 07645-14 NEW JERSEY HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENT ASSISTANCE AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. JUAN FREIRE, Respondent. Richard W. Kreig,
More informationSanta Monica College Nursing Initiative* Grievance and Complaint Procedures
I have received a copy and read the information included in the Santa Monica College Nursing Initiative Handout and will be responsible for its content. Signature date Printed Name Students with complaints,
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM
2006 AN OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM OUTCOMES As a result of this lesson, students will be able to: Summarize juvenile court process and procedures Define legal terms used in the juvenile justice
More informationFACT SHEET Contact: Office of Legislative and Public Affairs (703) 305-0289 Fax: (703) 605-0365 PAO.EOIR@usdoj.gov www.justice.gov/eoir/ Feb.
U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Office of the Director 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600 Falls Church, Virginia 22041 FACT SHEET Contact: (703) 305-0289 Fax: (703) 605-0365
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION 1
The court incorporates by reference in this paragraph and adopts as the findings and orders of this court the document set forth below. This document was signed electronically on January 28, 2009, which
More information