STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS"

Transcription

1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Bureau of Health Services, Petitioner v Karen Elizabeth Kloker, LPN, Respondent / Docket No Agency No Agency: Bureau of Health Services Case Type: Sanction Summary Suspension Issued and entered this 3 rd day of May, 2001 by Andrew W. Foster, Jr. Administrative Law Judge PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Karen E. Kloker, Respondent herein, is licensed to practice as a licensed practical nurse. The Department of Consumer and Industry Services, Bureau of Health Services (BHS), Petitioner, filed an Administrative Complaint against Respondent. In its Complaint, BHS alleged that Respondent violated provisions of the Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368; MCL et seq; MSA (1101) et seq; hereinafter the Code, and/or certain applicable Administrative Rules. Pursuant to MCL ; MSA 14.15(16232), a hearing was scheduled to address the issues raised in the Administrative Complaint and Order of Summary

2 Page 2 Suspension. The hearing was conducted on October 10, Jack Blumenkopf, an Assistant Attorney General, appeared on behalf of BHS. Hayim I. Gross and Steven Rabinovitz, Attorneys at Law, appeared on behalf of Respondent. Andrew W. Foster, Jr. presided as Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). EXHIBITS: Petitioner s Exhibits: 1. Hospital Report 2. MHPRC Report, 6/14/00 3. MHPRC Report, 1/4/01 4. MHPRC Report, 1/25/01 5. MHPRC letter, 1/25/01 ISSUES and APPLICABLE LAW: The Board of Nursing issued an Administrative Complaint and Order of Summary Suspension on August 18, Essentially, the Complaint alleges Ms. Kloker failed to comply with the Final Order of the Board issued May 11, 2000, in resolution of the Administrative Complaint of April 27, The terms of probation required, in part, that Ms. Kloker enter into a monitoring agreement within 60 days after the effective date, with Michigan Health Professionals Recovery Corporation (MHPRC). Ms. Kloker has failed/refused to enter into a monitoring agreement required by the probationary terms of the Final Order, in violation of: MCL et seq; MSA 14.15(1101) et seq

3 Page 3 FINDINGS OF FACT: State of Michigan. AACS, R and Section Violation of a final order issued by a disciplinary committee, board, or task force constitutes a violation of this rule. Section The department may investigate activities related to the practice of a health profession by a licensee... The disciplinary subcommittee shall proceed under section if it finds that 1 or more of the following grounds exist: (g) A violation, or aiding or abetting in a violation, of this article or of a rule promulgated under this article. Karen Elizabeth Kloker, Respondent herein, is a licensed practical nurse in the On April 27, 1999, an Administrative Complaint with the Disciplinary Subcommittee of the Michigan Board of Nursing charged Respondent with violating 1996 MR 7, R (8) and Section (9) of the Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368, as amended, and Section 16221(9), supra. After the hearing, the Board issued a Final Order on May 11, The Order in part ordered Respondent s license to practice nursing in the State of Michigan is LIMITED for a minimum period of one year. Respondent s license was placed in PROBATION for a minimum of three years. The terms of paragraph 1 of the probation report are as follows: 1. MONITORING AGREEMENT/EVALUATION: Within 60 days after the effective date of this Order, Respondent shall contact the Michigan Health Professional Recovery Corporation (Contractor), telephone number , and enter into

4 Page 4 a disciplinary, non-confidential treatment monitoring agreement with the Contractor. To the extent that the terms of the monitoring agreement call for reports which are also required by this order, Respondent shall submit all reports in the manner specified by the monitoring agreement. If Respondent fails to enter into or comply with the terms of the monitoring agreement, the Contractor shall immediately so notify the Department s designee in writing of such confirmed non-compliance. All information and documentation acquired by the Program Administrator in developing and implementing the monitoring agreement required herein, including but not limited to, reports of mental and physical evaluations, employer reports, therapist reports, shall be made available to the Department upon request to establish Respondent s compliance or non-compliance with the monitoring agreement and this order. Upon Respondent s successful completion of the monitoring agreement, the Contractor shall promptly notify the Department in writing. Ms. Kloker testified she was a graduate of the York County Vocational Technical Practical Nursing Program, a one-year course. Pursuant to the Final Order, supra, she contacted Dr. Landlau at MHPRC. Dr. Landau recommended Respondent see Dr. Lee Young, at Brighton Hospital, for assessment/evaluation. Following the evaluation, Dr. Lee recommended Respondent enter into an Intensive Out-patient Program (IOP) before entering into an MHPRC agreement. Dr. Lee made Dr. Landau aware of the IOP recommendation. Respondent contacted her insurance company to determine where to obtain treatment, more particularly, where her insurance coverage, OMNI Care, would pay for

5 Page 5 treatment. Her insurance carrier recommended a facility in downtown Detroit. She was concerned about the location and did not go. Respondent desired to continue treatment with Dr. Young. She denied having money to continue treatment. She believed if her income tax refund had been received, at that time, plans could have been made to continue to treat (IOP) at Brighton. Respondent submits it would cost $2,000 to $2,500 to continue treatment with Dr. Young. At this time, Respondent had not complied with the treatment requirements of the monitoring agreement. The ALJ finds Respondent has failed to follow the requirements of the Final Order. Respondent further submits, she contacted OMNI Care again for a reference to another treatment facility. She was referred to Eastwood Clinic in Livonia. June 2 or June 5, 2000, was her appointment date. Respondent alleges the reason she did not keep her appointment was she was terminated from her employment with the Four Seasons Nursing Center. The termination from employment coincided with the termination of insurance of the same date. Respondent worked for Four Seasons Nursing Center from October 1998 until June 5, According to Respondent, she attempted to reach Dr. Landau to explain the problem that she no longer had Omni Care coverage and therefore, was not able to enter into an IOP program. Also, Respondent claimed transportation problems. Again, the ALJ finds Respondent failed to parcipate in an IOP treatment program, although she had Omni Care coverage during the period of October 1998 until the last day worked, June 5, Respondent knew IOP treatment was required to facilitate entry into an MHPRC contract.

6 Page 6 Subsequent to employment at Four Seasons, Respondent began working as a charge nurse, July 17, 2000, at Charter House. On August 15, 2000, Respondent was issued a Summary Suspension. Because she was no longer able to function as a nurse, Respondent s duties were changed to laundry and housekeeping, effectively reducing her wages from $1,725 a month to $8.32 per hour. Respondent submits, she was employed long enough at Charter House so that by September 20, 2000, she enrolled in the Blue Care Network. Respondent persisted, she had obtained authorization from Blue Care Network to commence a six-week IOP program at either Maplegrow or Oakland Family Services. She planned to enroll on October 11, 2000, the day after this hearing commenced, at Maplegrove. Ms. Kloker contends some of her problems stem from her relationship with her former roommate who was tampering with her mail. Correspondence from the Department did not always reach her. The Summary Suspension of August 18, 2000 was served at her job. The ALJ found, after extensive questioning of Respondent, the testimony not to be credible with respect to this allegation. Interim Motion with Interim Procedural Findings of Fact At the conclusion of Respondent s testimony, Respondent s attorney requested a continuance in order to provide an opportunity to Ms. Kloker to follow through with entry into the Maplegrown IOP program, based on her testimony that Blue Care Network had authorized treatment. In the meantime, an Order Dissolving Summary Suspension will issue in order

7 Page 7 to give Respondent a final opportunity to enter into the required terms of the monitoring agreement. The Order was issued October 10, On January 29, 2001, the Department was informed that Respondent had failed to enter into the required monitoring agreement and therefore, issued an Order of Summary Suspension, February 23, Further, Respondent failed to appear for hearing on January 27, 2001 and March 8, 2001, the dates of the continuance. Hayim I. Gross, Respondent s attorney, made a motion to withdraw as Respondent s attorney. There being no objection, the motion is granted. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: I find Ms. Kloker has failed to comply with the Final Order that she enter into and comply with a MHPRC monitoring agreement. the Final Order: Respondent has recited a litany of reasons and excuses for not complying with 1. She did not like the location of the IOP facilities; 2. Not reasonable to go to facilities she did not choose; 3. Brighton s IOP program was expensive; 4. She lacked transportation to go to Eastwood; 5. She had no insurance; 6. Awaiting income tax refund in order to pay for non-insurance-funded IOP; 7. Respondent s roommate interfered with receipt of mail;

8 Page 8 8. When job was terminated her income was substantially reduced; 9. She was paying child support from her income; and so on. The principles that govern judicial proceedings also apply to administrative hearings. The burden of proof is upon the Petitioner to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Respondent violated the Public Health Code as alleged, and that grounds exist for imposition of sanctions. Smith v Lansing School District, 428 Mich 248; 406 NW 2d 825 (1987). The Bureau of Health Services has established by a preponderance of the evidence that Karen Elizabeth Kloker, failed to comply with a Final Order of the Board s Disciplinary Subcommittee issued on May 11, Therefore, Ms. Kloker has violated Rule and Code Section 16221(g). I find Respondent has had four admission opportunities for entry to the IOP/ MHPRC program, and she has not supplied proof of entry to date. Moreover, Respondent has been employed continuously from October 1998, except for approximately one months, to date of hearing. I further find Respondent has shown indifference and/or disdain for the legal process by failing to appear at or conclude the hearing. EXCEPTIONS: Within 15 days after service of this Proposal for Decision, a Party may file Exceptions and present written arguments. Within 5 days thereafter, an opposing Party may file a response to the Exceptions and written arguments. Any such Exceptions and

9 Page 9 Response should be submitted to the opposing party and to:

10 Page 10 Bureau of Health Services 611 West Ottawa St., 1 st Floor PO Box Lansing, MI Attn: Ray Garza Andrew W. Foster, Jr. Administrative Law Judge

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Bureau of Health Services, Petitioner v Marie L. Falquet, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1297 Agency No.

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Pearlie May Love-Bridgeman, R.N., Petitioner v Bureau of Health Professions, Respondent / Docket No. 2003-1541

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Christopher Michael Smith, Petitioner v Bureau of Health Services, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-2036 Agency

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Kathleen Ann Dils, RN, Petitioner v Bureau of Health Services, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1864 Agency

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services Office of Financial and Insurance Services,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Bureau of Commercial Services, Petitioner v Randy Alvin Bishop, Respondent / Docket No. 1999-5164 Agency

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BOARD OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS AND MAINTENANCE & ALTERATION CONTRACTORS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BOARD OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS AND MAINTENANCE & ALTERATION CONTRACTORS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BOARD OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS AND MAINTENANCE & ALTERATION CONTRACTORS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH, Docket No. 2003-1425 BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No.

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No. STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Sharon A. Jones, Petitioner v State Employees Retirement System, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1214 Agency

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Darrell Blane Manning, LPC, SW, Petitioner v Bureau of Health Services, Respondent / Docket No. 2001-1614

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Services

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Services STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Christine Gail Hill, R.N., L.P.N., Petitioner v Bureau of Health Services, Respondent / Docket No. 2002-860

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Bureau of Health Services, Petitioner v Gayl Marie Godsell-Stytz, D.O., Respondent / Docket No. 1999-4029

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Mary Elizabeth McGill, L.P.N., Petitioner v Bureau of Health Services, Respondent / Docket No. 2003-1456 Agency

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of XXXXX XXXXX, Petitioner v Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, Respondent / Docket No. 2001-407 Agency

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No.

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. Agency No. STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Ned S. Curtis, III, Petitioner v Public School Employees Retirement System, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1025

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Arthur Peter Bober, M.D., Petitioner v Bureau of Health Services, Respondent / Docket No. 2003-1279 Agency No.

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of John Allen Fuller, C.N.A., Petitioner v Bureau of Health Professions, Respondent / Docket No. 2004-100 Agency

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services Human Capital, LLC, Petitioner, v Case No.

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services Raymond E. Cantrell, II, Petitioner, Case

More information

Appeal Docket: WH 1999-5091-D. Determination Order: L070699032 DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE. Procedural Findings

Appeal Docket: WH 1999-5091-D. Determination Order: L070699032 DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE. Procedural Findings STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES OFFICE OF HEARINGS State Secondary Complex General Office Building 7150 Harris Drive, P.O. Box 30015 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Telephone: (517)

More information

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2009-34011 SAS Case No. DECISION AND ORDER

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2009-34011 SAS Case No. DECISION AND ORDER STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 IN THE MATTER OF: Docket

More information

Palomar Community College District Procedure AP 5520

Palomar Community College District Procedure AP 5520 1 STUDENT SERVICES 2 AP 5520 STUDENT DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 References: Education Code Sections 66017, 66300, 69810-69813,

More information

State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR EMERGENT RELIEF OAL DKT. NO. EDS 11539-14 AGENCY DKT. NO. 2015 21718E H.S. and M.S. ON BEHALF OF A.S., Petitioners, v. HARRISON

More information

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the complaint of ) RESSCO, LLC, d/b/a SG MANAGEMENT, and ) Case No. STAFFORD HOLDINGS, INC., against

More information

RESPIRATORY THERAPIST LICENSURE INSTRUCTIONS Authority: P.A. 368 of 1978, as amended This form is for information only.

RESPIRATORY THERAPIST LICENSURE INSTRUCTIONS Authority: P.A. 368 of 1978, as amended This form is for information only. DCH/LRT-020 (10/09) Michigan Department of Community Health Board of Respiratory Care P.O. Box 30670 Lansing, Michigan 48909 (517) 335-0918 www.michigan.gov/healthlicense RESPIRATORY THERAPIST LICENSURE

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Paterno E. Montayre, PT, Petitioner v Bureau of Health Services, Respondent / Docket No. 2001-1564 Agency

More information

SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM LOCAL PROGRAM RULES AND PROCEDURES

SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM LOCAL PROGRAM RULES AND PROCEDURES SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM LOCAL PROGRAM RULES AND PROCEDURES SECTION 1 - POLICY It is the policy of the Sixth Judicial District ( district ) to encourage out-of-court

More information

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2011-8066 TRN Case No. 29629449 DECISION AND ORDER

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2011-8066 TRN Case No. 29629449 DECISION AND ORDER STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 IN THE MATTER OF: Docket

More information

Defending Your License

Defending Your License Defending Your License The How-To for Michigan Health Care Professionals www.fb-firm.com About the Author: Tariq S. Hafeez Mr. Hafeez practices in the areas of business/corporate law, healthcare law, and

More information

Docket No. 2011-50152 QHP Case No. DECISION AND ORDER

Docket No. 2011-50152 QHP Case No. DECISION AND ORDER IN THE MATTER OF: STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 Appellant / DECISION

More information

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO People v. Kocel, Report,No.02PDJ035,1-08-03. Attorney Regulation. Respondent, Michael S. Kocel, attorney registration number 16305 was suspended from the practice of law in the State of Colorado for a

More information

BEFORE THE BOARD OF HEALING ARTS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER

BEFORE THE BOARD OF HEALING ARTS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER BEFORE THE BOARD OF HEALING ARTS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS,APR i t1 2015 KS Stale Board DilkallllgArts ~ In the Matter of Kansas License No. 04-25099 ) ) ) ) DocketNo. 15-HA00014 CONSENT ORDER COMES NOW,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,569. In the Matter of LUCAS L. THOMPSON, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,569. In the Matter of LUCAS L. THOMPSON, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 112,569 In the Matter of LUCAS L. THOMPSON, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed February 27, 2015.

More information

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A FINDINGS AND ORDER

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A FINDINGS AND ORDER BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A IN RE: DONALD W. COLSON ARKANSAS BAR ID No. 2005166 CPC Docket No. 2013-008 FINDINGS AND ORDER Donald W. Colson is an attorney licensed

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY

STATE OF MICHIGAN FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY STATE OF MICHIGAN FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF Docket No. 2003-1578 Lana Beaudry, Agency No. CF 520215975 Petitioner v Agency: Family Independence Agency Office of Children and Adult Licensing,

More information

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : :

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Matter of DAVID E. SHAPIRO PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT No. 691, Disciplinary Docket No. 2 Supreme Court No. 74 DB 1989 - Disciplinary

More information

SAN FRANCISCO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 96: COORDINATION BETWEEN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF CITIZEN COMPLAINTS

SAN FRANCISCO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 96: COORDINATION BETWEEN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF CITIZEN COMPLAINTS SAN FRANCISCO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 96: COORDINATION BETWEEN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF CITIZEN COMPLAINTS SEC. 96.1. DEFINITIONS. (a) "Chief of Police" shall mean the Chief of the Police

More information

FILED APR 2 5 2014. Attorney for Board of Nursing. DAG Susan Carboni Tel. (973) 648-2894 LICENSE # NO 09224400 STATE OF NEW JERSEY

FILED APR 2 5 2014. Attorney for Board of Nursing. DAG Susan Carboni Tel. (973) 648-2894 LICENSE # NO 09224400 STATE OF NEW JERSEY JOHN J. HOFFMAN ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY Division of Law, 5th Floor 124 Halsey Street P.O. Box 45029 Newark, NJ 07101 Attorney for Board of Nursing FILED APR 2 5 2014 N.J. BOARD OF NURSING

More information

CHAPTER 7. APPELLATE RULES MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985

CHAPTER 7. APPELLATE RULES MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985 CHAPTER 7. APPELLATE RULES MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985 Subchapter 7.100 Appeals to Circuit Court Rule 7.101 Scope of Rules (A) Scope of Rules. The rules in this subchapter govern appeals to the circuit

More information

1. The Minnesota Board of Dentistry ("Board") is authorized pursuant to Minnesota

1. The Minnesota Board of Dentistry (Board) is authorized pursuant to Minnesota BEFORE THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF DENTISTRY In the Matter of Thomas M. Garvin, D.D.S. License No. D9881 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONDITIONAL LICENSE STIPULATION Thomas M. Garvin, D.D.S. ("Licensee") and the

More information

NO. 00-B-3532 IN RE: LEONARD O. PARKER, JR ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

NO. 00-B-3532 IN RE: LEONARD O. PARKER, JR ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS 03/15/02 See News Release 020 for any concurrences and/or dissents. SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 00-B-3532 IN RE: LEONARD O. PARKER, JR ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This disciplinary

More information

RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA December 1, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RULES

More information

LR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal

LR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal LR2-400. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal proceedings in the Second Judicial District Court. This

More information

CHAPTER 42A HEARINGS AND APPEALS. Act shall mean the Casino Control Act, N.J.S.A. 5:12-1 et seq.

CHAPTER 42A HEARINGS AND APPEALS. Act shall mean the Casino Control Act, N.J.S.A. 5:12-1 et seq. CHAPTER 42A HEARINGS AND APPEALS SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 19:42A-1.1 Definitions The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context

More information

General complaint form for video/cable customers

General complaint form for video/cable customers Michigan Public Service Commission Formal Video/Cable Complaint General complaint form for video/cable customers I Want to File a Formal Complaint First, you must attempt to resolve your complaint directly

More information

19:13-2.1 Who may file

19:13-2.1 Who may file CHAPTER 13 SCOPE OF NEGOTIATIONS PROCEEDINGS Authority N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.4d, 34:13A-11 and 34:13A-27. SOURCE AND EFFECTIVE DATE R.2011 d.238, effective August 11, 2011. See: 43 N.J.R. 1189(a), 43 N.J.R.

More information

Introduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665.

Introduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665. Introduction On January 1, 2000, California's Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (Government Code sections 8547 et seq.) was significantly amended. The Legislature amended this law to strengthen protections

More information

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A CONSENT FINDINGS & ORDER

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A CONSENT FINDINGS & ORDER BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A IN RE: PAUL N. FORD - Respondent Attorney Arkansas Bar ID # 87060 CPC Docket No. 2013-046 CONSENT FINDINGS & ORDER The formal charges

More information

CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES

CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES Section 1. Authority. These Uniform County Board of Equalization Practice and Procedure Rules are promulgated by authority of

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 13 September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. WILLIAM M. LOGAN Bell, C.J. Raker Wilner Cathell Harrell Battaglia Greene JJ.

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Barbara Rozalia Kucharski, RN, aka Barbara Rozalia Sanders, Petitioner v Bureau of Health Services, Respondent

More information

BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF OREGON for the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES INSURANCE DIVISION ) ) ) ) )

BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF OREGON for the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES INSURANCE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF OREGON for the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES INSURANCE DIVISION In the Matter of CHERIE G. SMITH and BEST INSURANCE CONSULTANTS, LLC

More information

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 98-B-2513 IN RE: BARBARA IONE BIVINS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 98-B-2513 IN RE: BARBARA IONE BIVINS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 98-B-2513 IN RE: BARBARA IONE BIVINS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM * This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from three counts of formal charges instituted

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION KIMBERLY OWEN ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,050,199 MARKIN GROUP ) Respondent ) AND ) ) STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY )

More information

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PREHEARING INSTRUCTIONS For the purpose of facilitating disciplinary hearings and related proceedings that are conducted pursuant to Rule V of

More information

WREN ROBICHAUX NO. 2012-CA-0265 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF PRACTICAL NURSE EXAMINERS FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

WREN ROBICHAUX NO. 2012-CA-0265 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF PRACTICAL NURSE EXAMINERS FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA WREN ROBICHAUX VERSUS LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF PRACTICAL NURSE EXAMINERS * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2012-CA-0265 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS

More information

Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015

Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015 Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association Enacted November 18, 2015 Preamble and Purpose 1.) Background. Under Rule V, Section 5 of the

More information

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 96-9196 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Mark Davidson,

More information

BEFORE THE ALASKA PROFESSIONAL TEACHING PRACTICES COMMISSION. In the Matter of ) ) PATIENCE M. DUNBAR ) OAH No. 08-0375-PTP ) Agency Case No.

BEFORE THE ALASKA PROFESSIONAL TEACHING PRACTICES COMMISSION. In the Matter of ) ) PATIENCE M. DUNBAR ) OAH No. 08-0375-PTP ) Agency Case No. BEFORE THE ALASKA PROFESSIONAL TEACHING PRACTICES COMMISSION In the Matter of ) ) PATIENCE M. DUNBAR ) OAH No. 08-0375-PTP ) Agency Case No. 08-60 ORDER OF SUSPENSION I. Introduction Patience M. Dunbar,

More information

NO. 04-B-0828 IN RE: VINCENT ROSS CICARDO ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

NO. 04-B-0828 IN RE: VINCENT ROSS CICARDO ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS 07/02/04 See News Release 055 for any concurrences and/or dissents. SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 04-B-0828 IN RE: VINCENT ROSS CICARDO ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This disciplinary matter

More information

STATE BAR COURT OF CALIFORNIA HEARING DEPARTMENT LOS ANGELES. Case Nos.: 13-O-15838-DFM ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE BAR COURT OF CALIFORNIA HEARING DEPARTMENT LOS ANGELES. Case Nos.: 13-O-15838-DFM ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FILED MARCH 16, 2015 STATE BAR COURT OF CALIFORNIA HEARING DEPARTMENT LOS ANGELES In the Matter of ANDREW MacLAREN STEWART, Member No. 204170, A Member of the State Bar. Case Nos.: 13-O-15838-DFM DECISION

More information

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR STORY COUNTY

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR STORY COUNTY IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR STORY COUNTY YEMPABOU PALO, Petitioner, No. CVCV048520 vs. IOWA BOARD OF REGENTS, RULING Respondent. On the 10th day of January, 2014, Petitioner s Interlocutory Motion for

More information

CHAPTER 9. PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985

CHAPTER 9. PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985 CHAPTER 9. PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985 Subchapter 9.100 Attorney Grievance Commission; Attorney Discipline Board Rule 9.101 Definitions As used in subchapter 9.100:

More information

HEARING DECISION. Did the Department correctly determine the Claimant s community spouse income allowance? FINDINGS OF FACT

HEARING DECISION. Did the Department correctly determine the Claimant s community spouse income allowance? FINDINGS OF FACT STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES IN THE MATTER OF: Reg. No.: Issue No.: Case No.: Hearing Date: County: 2012 39490 2019

More information

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-2-15 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-2-15 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-2-15 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND TABLE OF CONTENTS 0800-2-15-.01 Definitions 0800-2-15-.10 Representation

More information

PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.

PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2004-30 UNITED STATES TAX COURT JOHN WILLIAM HOLLIS, Petitioner,

More information

Resolution Agreement Southern Virginia University Case Nos. 11-14-2288 and 11-14-2290

Resolution Agreement Southern Virginia University Case Nos. 11-14-2288 and 11-14-2290 Resolution Agreement Southern Virginia University Case Nos. 11-14-2288 and 11-14-2290 Southern Virginia University (the University) agrees to fully implement this resolution agreement (the Agreement) to

More information

The Public Defender cannot file these motions for you or represent you in your hearing unless the Court appoints us to do so.

The Public Defender cannot file these motions for you or represent you in your hearing unless the Court appoints us to do so. Law Offices of JULIANNE M. HOLT Public Defender Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida 700 East Twiggs Street, Fifth Floor P.O. Box 172910 Tampa, Florida 33672-0910 RE: Pro se Motion to Withdraw Capias

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. No. SC11-2500 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. EUGENE KEITH POLK, Respondent. [November 14, 2013] We have for review a referee s report recommending that Respondent

More information

REPORT, DECISION AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTION

REPORT, DECISION AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTION People v. Garrow, No. 00PDJ068, 9.25.01. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and Hearing Board suspended the Respondent, William F. Garrow, from the practice of law for a period of one

More information

CHAPTER 43-41 SOCIAL WORKERS

CHAPTER 43-41 SOCIAL WORKERS CHAPTER 43-41 SOCIAL WORKERS 43-41-01. Definitions. In this chapter, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires: 1. "Board" means the North Dakota board of social work examiners. 2. "College

More information

Subpart C Administrative Wage Garnishment

Subpart C Administrative Wage Garnishment Small Business Administration 140.11 (m) Where an IRS tax refund offset is sought, SBA must follow the Department of the Treasury s regulations governing offset of a past-due, legally enforceable debt

More information

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW Rule Effective 700. Subject Matter of the Family Law Court 07/01/2011 700.5 Attorneys and Self Represented Parties 07/01/2011 700.6 Family Law Filings 01/01/2012 701. Assignment of

More information

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY President Judge General Court Regulation No. 2005-05 In Re: Amendment, Adoption and Rescission of Philadelphia

More information

*** DRAFT - NOT YET FILED ***

*** DRAFT - NOT YET FILED *** *** DRAFT - NOT YET FILED *** 4123-3-35 Employer handicap reimbursement. (A) For the purposes of handicap reimbursement under section 4123.343 of the Revised Code, a "handicapped employee" means an employee

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc. Docket No. 0 1-9041

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc. Docket No. 0 1-9041 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 0 1-9041 ORDER REVOKING PROBATIONARY LICENSE ORDERED: The probationary license issued to JOHN P. SHAVERS is revoked, pursuant to the recommendation contained

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS _Student, by and through Parent_ Nos.C-DP-01-ADE C-DP-00-ADE C-DP-01-ADE Petitioners, C-DP-02-ADE C-DP-0-ADE -v- (Consolidated) Sierra Vista Unified School

More information

THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C.

THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. DIRECTOR, ) OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL ) RESPONSIBILITY, ) ) Complainant, ) ) Complaint No. 2010-08

More information

NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS 05/23/2014 "See News Release 028 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM Pursuant to Supreme

More information

02/26/2014 "See News Release 013 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 14-B-0061 IN RE: KEISHA M.

02/26/2014 See News Release 013 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents. SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 14-B-0061 IN RE: KEISHA M. 02/26/2014 "See News Release 013 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 14-B-0061 IN RE: KEISHA M. JONES-JOSEPH ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This disciplinary

More information

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS DIRECTOR'S OFFICE MICHIGAN MEDICAL MARIHUANA

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS DIRECTOR'S OFFICE MICHIGAN MEDICAL MARIHUANA DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS DIRECTOR'S OFFICE MICHIGAN MEDICAL MARIHUANA (By authority conferred on the director of the department of licensing and regulatory affairs by section 5 of

More information

Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD. Civil Remedies Division

Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD. Civil Remedies Division Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD Civil Remedies Division Scott Christie, Psy.D. (OI File No. H-12-42635-9) Petitioner, v. The Inspector General. Docket No. C-14-88 Decision

More information

T.C. Memo. 2010-254 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. THOMAS M. AND DONNA GENTILE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

T.C. Memo. 2010-254 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. THOMAS M. AND DONNA GENTILE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent T.C. Memo. 2010-254 UNITED STATES TAX COURT THOMAS M. AND DONNA GENTILE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 14226-08. Filed November 18, 2010. R determined a deficiency

More information

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2011-52740 EDW, Case No. 22907105 DECISION AND ORDER

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2011-52740 EDW, Case No. 22907105 DECISION AND ORDER STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH P.O. Box 30763, Lansing, MI 48909 (877) 833-0870; Fax: (517) 334-9505 IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. 2011-52740

More information

INSTRUCTIONS FOR LICENSURE BY ENDORSEMENT FOR GRADUATES OF AVMA-APPROVED PROGRAMS NOTE:

INSTRUCTIONS FOR LICENSURE BY ENDORSEMENT FOR GRADUATES OF AVMA-APPROVED PROGRAMS NOTE: LARA/LVT-080 (01/13) Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Board of Veterinary Medicine P.O. Box 30670 Lansing, Michigan 48909 (517) 335-0918 www.michigan.gov/healthlicense VETERINARY

More information

PROCESS SERVERS Section 22350 Business & Professions Code

PROCESS SERVERS Section 22350 Business & Professions Code PROCESS SERVERS Section 22350 Business & Professions Code NECESSITY OF FILING REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE Section 22350 a) Any natural person who makes more than 10 services of process within this county

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER Diet 100 ORGANIZATIONAL RULES. PART Diet 101 PURPOSE Section Diet 101.01 Purpose

TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER Diet 100 ORGANIZATIONAL RULES. PART Diet 101 PURPOSE Section Diet 101.01 Purpose CHAPTER Diet 100 ORGANIZATIONAL RULES PART Diet 101 PURPOSE Section Diet 101.01 Purpose PART Diet 102 DEFINITIONS Section Diet 102.01 Terms Used TABLE OF CONTENTS PART Diet 103 DESCRIPTION OF THE AGENCY

More information

REGISTERED NURSE AND PRACTICAL NURSE LICENSURE BY ENDORSEMENT INSTRUCTIONS Authority: P.A. 368 of 1978, as amended This form is for information only.

REGISTERED NURSE AND PRACTICAL NURSE LICENSURE BY ENDORSEMENT INSTRUCTIONS Authority: P.A. 368 of 1978, as amended This form is for information only. LARA/LNR-501 (06/12) Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Board of Nursing P.O. Box 30193 Lansing, Michigan 48909 (517) 335-0918 www.michigan.gov/healthlicense REGISTERED NURSE AND PRACTICAL

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE OAH 7-1005-22621-2 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE In the Matter of Nationwide Solutions, David Newman and Mitch Matthews FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS

More information

People v. Eamick. 06PDJ086. June 21, 2007. Attorney Regulation. Following a hearing, a Hearing Board publicly censured Respondent Dennis L.

People v. Eamick. 06PDJ086. June 21, 2007. Attorney Regulation. Following a hearing, a Hearing Board publicly censured Respondent Dennis L. People v. Eamick. 06PDJ086. June 21, 2007. Attorney Regulation. Following a hearing, a Hearing Board publicly censured Respondent Dennis L. Eamick (Attorney Registration No. 34259) and ordered him to pay

More information

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION Student Hearing Office 810 First Street, NE, 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20002

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION Student Hearing Office 810 First Street, NE, 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20002 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION Student Hearing Office 810 First Street, NE, 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20002 OSSE Student Hearing Office January 23, 2014 PETITIONER,

More information

1. The Minnesota Board of Dentistry ("Board") is authorized pursuant to Minnesota

1. The Minnesota Board of Dentistry (Board) is authorized pursuant to Minnesota BEFORE THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF DENTISTRY In the Matter of Robert H. Cheney, D.D.S License No. D11152 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR STAYED SUSPENSION AND CONDITIONAL LICENSE STIPULATION Robert H. Cheney, D.D.S.

More information

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION FORMAL COMPLAINT

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION FORMAL COMPLAINT MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION FORMAL COMPLAINT I WANT TO FILE A COMPLAINT Try to resolve your complaint directly with the company in question. The company's customer service number should be listed

More information

, Plaintiff, Defendant., Esq., appeared on behalf of the petitioning

, Plaintiff, Defendant., Esq., appeared on behalf of the petitioning STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF vs., Plaintiff, DISTRICT COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Personal Injury File No.: Judge: Defendant., UNIFM FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND DER TO APPROVE MIN

More information

13-22840-rdd Doc 402 Filed 10/25/13 Entered 10/25/13 16:17:31 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. (Jointly Administered)

13-22840-rdd Doc 402 Filed 10/25/13 Entered 10/25/13 16:17:31 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. (Jointly Administered) Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------x In re: SOUND SHORE MEDICAL CENTER OF WESTCHESTER, et al., 1 Debtors.

More information

FILED November 9, 2007

FILED November 9, 2007 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2007 Term No. 33067 LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Petitioner FILED November 9, 2007 released at 10:00 a.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CARL C. WEBSTER ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 233,685 CORBIN FISH FARM ) Respondent ) AND ) ) FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE ) Insurance

More information

BEFORE THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No. 2012-9-03. Complainant, ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST

BEFORE THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No. 2012-9-03. Complainant, ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST LAWRENCE G. WASDEN Attorney General BRIAN D. NICHOLAS- I.S.B. #3585 Deputy Attorney General State ofldaho Department of Finance P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83 720-0031 Telephone: (208) 332-8092 Facsimile:

More information

Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX C - New Jersey Tax Court Rules Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Rule 8:1. Rule 8:2. Rule 8:3. Rule 8:4. TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope: Applicability Review Jurisdiction

More information

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES LOCAL RULES FOR FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI [Renumbered and codified by order of the Supreme Court effective May 18, 2006; amended effective April 23, 2009.] RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. In the matter of Docket No. 2001-1668

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS. In the matter of Docket No. 2001-1668 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Docket No. 2001-1668 Tony Francesco Scalici, D.O., Agency No. 51-01-1780-00 Petitioner v Agency: Bureau

More information