STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE
|
|
- Emerald Sanders
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Link to Final Agency Decision OAH Docket No STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE In the Matter of Christopher Douglas Dorpat, Real Estate Appraiser License No FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before Administrative Law Judge Kathleen D. Sheehy on December 19, The OAH record closed on January 23, 2006, upon receipt of the final post-hearing submission. Michael J. Tostengard, Assistant Attorney General, 1200 NCL Tower, 445 Minnesota Street, St. Paul, MN , appeared on behalf of the Minnesota Department of Commerce (Department). Edward M. Cohen, Jr., Esq., Cohen & Friedberg, Ltd., 3015 Ottawa Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN 55416, appeared on behalf of Christopher Douglas Dorpat (Respondent). NOTICE This Report is a recommendation, not a final decision. The Commissioner of Commerce will make the final decision after reviewing the record and may adopt, reject or modify these Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Recommendation. Under Minn. Stat , the Commissioner s decision shall not be made until this Report has been available to the parties to the proceeding for at least ten (10) days. [1] An opportunity must be afforded to each party adversely affected by this Report to file exceptions and present argument to the Commissioner. Parties should contact Kevin Murphy, Deputy Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Commerce, 85 Seventh Place East, Suite 500, St. Paul, MN to ascertain the procedure for filing exceptions or presenting argument to the Commissioner. If the Commissioner fails to issue a final decision within 90 days of the close of the record, this report will constitute the final agency decision under Minn. Stat , subd. 2a (2004). The record closes upon the filing of exceptions to the report and the presentation of argument to the Commissioner, or upon the expiration of the deadline for doing so. The Commissioner must notify the parties and the Administrative Law Judge of the date on which the record closes.
2 Under Minn. Stat , subd. 1, the agency is required to serve its final decision upon each party and the Administrative Law Judge by first class mail or as otherwise provided by law. STATEMENT OF ISSUES 1. Did the Respondent demonstrate untrustworthiness in violation of Minn. Stat , subd. 7, by submitting an appraisal containing non-existent comparable home sales? 2. Did the Respondent fail to exercise reasonable diligence in violation of Minn. Stat. 82B.20, subd. 2 (5) and (6), by submitting an appraisal using non-existent comparable homes sales? 3. Did the Respondent demonstrate negligence and incompetence in violation of Minn. Stat. 82B.20, subd. 2 (7), by submitting an appraisal using non-existent comparable home sales? 4. Did the Respondent fail to personally inspect comparables in violation of Minn. R , subp. 3.A. (3), by submitting an appraisal using non-existent comparable home sales? 5. Did the Respondent use inappropriate comparables in violation of Minn. R , subp. 3.A. (4), by submitting an appraisal using non-existent comparable home sales? 6. Did the Respondent develop a valuation conclusion that is not supported by available market data in violation of Minn. R , subp. 3.A. (8), by submitting an appraisal using non-existent comparable home sales? 7. Did the Respondent violate Minn. Stat , subd. 7, by failing to provide the Department with the appraisal file for the property in question? Based upon all of the files, records and proceedings herein, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Respondent is currently licensed as a real estate appraiser by the Department, License No The Respondent s company, opened in 2000, is called Rapid Appraisals. During 2002 the Respondent operated the company from a basement office in his residence at 9592 Zircon Court in Maple Grove, Minnesota. 2. The Respondent did not conduct most of the appraisals performed by his company. Rapid Appraisals subcontracted with registered appraisers; the Respondent, as the licensed appraiser, reviewed their work for accuracy and signed off on the appraisals as a supervising appraiser. During 2002, the Respondent contracted with eight or nine individuals who were each performing between three and ten appraisals per week. By operation of law, the Respondent remained responsible for the content of the appraisals. [2]
3 3. The appraisal business has become increasingly electronic. The registered appraisers who performed appraisals for Rapid Appraisals sent them by to the Respondent, who reviewed them for accuracy and made any necessary changes. When his review was completed, the Respondent scanned his signature onto the document, and forwarded it by to the party who requested it. [3] 4. The Respondent uses a software package called TOTAL for Windows. [4] The sketching software in this package is called Apex. Each of the Respondent s subcontractors is licensed to use this software in preparing appraisals. 5. In October 2003, a review appraiser named Ed Caffrey submitted a complaint to the Department concerning an appraisal of property located at County 7 Boulevard in Welch, Minnesota. Mr. Caffrey had discovered that the appraisal in question contained information about comparable residential properties, as required by law, for properties that did not exist. [5] 6. The appraisal, dated January 25, 2002, provides that it was submitted to Gateway Mortgage at the request of the homeowner, for purposes of a refinancing transaction. The appraisal appears to have been performed by Rapid Appraisals and identifies the Respondent as the actual appraiser (not as a supervisor). The appraisal contains what appears to be the Respondent s electronic signature and license number. It is missing a number of documents that are typically attached to an appraisal, including a map identifying the location of the subject property and the comparables, the appraiser s certification of compliance with USPAP, and the invoice for preparation of the appraisal. [6] 7. Department investigator Pat Stock was assigned to the complaint. As part of the investigation, Ms. Stock verified with Goodhue County that the three properties listed as comparables on the January 25, 2002, appraisal did not exist. [7] Ms. Stock does not know where Caffrey obtained the appraisal from, why he had it, or who his employer is. She has no information about the source of the appraisal, why it was prepared, for whom it was prepared, or to whom it was submitted, other than what is contained on the face of the document itself. [8] 8. Ms. Stock called the Respondent in for questioning, and on December 10, 2003, she and Julie Kosmalski (another Department investigator), the Respondent, and the Respondent s attorney, Edward Cohen, Jr., met to discuss the complaint. Ms. Stock provided the Respondent with a Tennessen warning by letter before the meeting. [9] 9. The parties versions of what was discussed at this meeting vary significantly. Ms. Stock testified that the Respondent did not deny preparing the appraisal, admitted that he performed the appraisal but left Welch before obtaining information about comparable properties, and later relied on a telephone call to a local real estate agent to obtain unverified data concerning comparable homes. Ms. Stock also testified that the Respondent apologized for his actions and said that he had made a mistake. [10]
4 10. The Respondent and his attorney testified that at no time during the December 10 meeting did the Respondent admit to creating the appraisal and that he explained that the signature appeared to be his, but that there were irregularities that made him question whether he had produced it. The signature is not positioned correctly, and there is a line below it that makes it appear, on both the cover letter and the appraisal itself, that the signature was pasted on and the document copied thereafter. It was the Respondent s belief that Ms. Stock had set up the meeting to discuss how his signature might have been used to generate a fraudulent appraisal. The Respondent testified further that any statements he made about the comparables on the appraisal were merely speculation on how someone might go about generating false comparables, and that Ms. Stock misconstrued this discussion as an admission that he had performed the appraisal and obtained the information about comparables in this manner. When asked to produce all working papers relating to the appraisal, the Respondent told her that he could not confirm or deny that he had any, because many of his paper files had been lost in a flood of his basement office, and many of his electronic files had been damaged when the hard drive on his computer crashed. He maintained he apologized only for the failure to have all of his backup files. [11] 11. At some point, possibly before, during, or after this meeting, Ms. Stock obtained a copy of a similar appraisal for the same property dated February 11, 2002, addressed to Northern Lights Mortgage. She wrote on the back of it Dorpat 12/3/03, but believes this date to be erroneous. She does not recall exactly how she obtained it, but believes the Respondent provided it to her in response to her request for working papers relating to the appraisal, and that he printed it off of the restored hard drive on his computer. Because it was not folded, Ms. Stock presumes it was hand-delivered to her, probably at the December 10 meeting. [12] 12. The second appraisal contains the Respondent s name but no signatures, electronic or otherwise. It contains color photographs of the subject property and the alleged comparable properties. It contains a sketch of the subject property s floor plan that is different than that in the first appraisal. It also contains the appraiser s certification and an incomplete invoice in the amount of $ The Department s investigation concluded at the December 10, 2003 meeting. The Department did not seek to obtain any further information from the homeowner, Gateway Mortgage, Northern Lights Mortgage, or Mr. Caffrey. 14. Neither the first nor the second appraisal of the property appears to have been prepared using the Apex sketching software used by the Respondent, which contains the Apex IV notation on the sketch page and calculates square footage in a different manner. [13] 15. On March 18, 2005, 15 months later, the Commissioner of Commerce issued a Notice of and Order for Hearing, Order for Prehearing
5 Conference, and Statement of Charges. The Notice of and Order for Hearing provides that the Department initiated this action to determine whether Respondent violated Minn. Stat , subd. 7(4) and 82B.20, subd. 2 (5), (6), and (7), and Minn. R , subp. 3A (3), (4), and (8), subjecting him to disciplinary action. Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following: CONCLUSIONS 1. The Administrative Law Judge and the Commissioner of Commerce are authorized to consider the charges against Respondent under Minn. Stat , subd. 7, 82B.07, and (2004). 2. Respondent received due, proper and timely notice of the charges against him, and of the time and place of the hearing. This matter is, therefore, properly before the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge. 3. The Department has complied with all relevant procedural requirements. 4. The Commissioner may deny, revoke, or suspend the license of a real estate appraiser if the licensee has engaged in an act or practice, whether or not the act or practice directly involves the business which the person is licensed or authorized, which demonstrates that the applicant or licensee is untrustworthy, financially irresponsible, or otherwise incompetent or unqualified to act under the authority or license granted by the commissioner. [14] 5. The license of a licensed real estate appraiser may be denied, revoked, suspended, or otherwise disciplined if the licensee engages in a violation of any of the standards for the development or communication of real estate appraisals as provided by statute; fails or refuses without good cause to exercise reasonable diligence in developing an appraisal, preparing an appraisal report, or in communicating an appraisal; or engages in negligence or incompetence in developing an appraisal, in preparing an appraisal, or in communicating an appraisal. [15] 6. A licensed real estate appraiser must not knowingly engage in any of the following unacceptable appraisal practices:... (3) unless otherwise disclosed in the appraisal report, use comparables in the valuation process that the appraiser has not at least personally inspected from the exterior by driving by them; (4) select and use inappropriate comparable sales or fail to use comparables that are physically and by location the most similar to the subject property;... or (8) develop a valuation conclusion that is not supported by available market data.... [16]
6 7. The Department has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the Respondent violated the statutes and rules as alleged in its Notice of and Order for Hearing. [17] 8. The Department has failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the Respondent engaged in an act which demonstrates that the Respondent is untrustworthy, financially irresponsible, or otherwise incompetent or unqualified to act as a licensed real estate appraiser in violation of Minn. Stat , subd. 7(a)(4). 9. The Department has failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the Respondent engaged in a violation of any of the standards for the development or communication of real estate appraisals as provided by statute; failed or refused without good cause to exercise reasonable diligence in developing an appraisal, preparing an appraisal report, or in communicating an appraisal; or engaged in negligence or incompetence in developing an appraisal, in preparing an appraisal, or in communicating an appraisal in violation of Minn. Stat. 82B.20, subd. 2 (5), (6), and (7). 10. The Department has failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the Respondent knowingly made any of the following unacceptable appraisal practices: (3) unless otherwise disclosed in the appraisal report, used comparables in the valuation process that the appraiser has not at least personally inspected from the exterior by driving by them; (4) selected and used inappropriate comparable sales or fail to use comparables that are physically and by location the most similar to the subject property;... or (8) developed a valuation conclusion that is not supported by available market data in violation of Minn. R , subp. 3.A. (3), (4), or (8). Based upon the foregoing Conclusions, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following: RECOMMENDATION IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED: that the Commissioner of Commerce dismiss the complaint against the Respondent s Real Estate Appraiser license. Dated this 22nd day of February, s/kathleen D. Sheehy KATHLEEN D. SHEEHY Administrative Law Judge Reported: Tape recorded (one tape). MEMORANDUM The violations alleged here are extremely serious and deserving of investigation by the Department. If this appraisal was in fact prepared and
7 submitted to a lending institution, there is no question but that it would constitute a financial fraud. The Department s evidence consisted of the two versions of the appraisal in question, one of which contains signatures and one that does not. The investigator has no independent information about how or why the appraisal came to be prepared or to whom it was submitted. To prove its case, the Department has relied heavily on the testimony of Ms. Stock as to what admissions were made at the December 10, 2003, meeting. The Administrative Law Judge concludes that none of the testimony concerning what happened during this meeting more than two years ago is deserving of much credit. Ms. Stock clearly had a difficult time remembering what happened and how she came to have the second appraisal, and her notes made at the time (which were not offered into evidence) did not assist her recollection. The Respondent s testimony about the meeting was more specific, as was his attorney s, but their testimony could well be influenced by obvious biases. The Respondent also offered what might be described as convenient and not entirely credible testimony concerning the destruction of his back-up files. The Administrative Law Judge concludes that the appraisal documents are the most meaningful evidence in this case. There do appear to be irregularities in the manner in which the Respondent s signature is attached to the first one, and the sketch pages are different in both versions than those typically produced by the Apex software. Respondent also presented evidence regarding fraud in the appraisal industry, and the ease with which it is perpetrated. It is possible that someone else attached the Respondent s signature to the first appraisal, although that person would have to have had access to the same appraisal software. [18] The Department s obligation is to prove its allegations by a preponderance of the evidence. The Minnesota Supreme Court has observed that while the proper standard of proof in professional licensing matters is a preponderance of the evidence, the agency s decision must be supported by evidence with heft or significance: Even so these proceedings brought on behalf of the state, attacking a person s professional and personal reputation and character and seeking to impose disciplinary sanctions, are no ordinary proceedings. We trust that in all professional disciplinary matters, the finder of fact, bearing in mind the gravity of the decision to be made, will be persuaded only by evidence with heft. [19] After a careful review of the limited evidence presented in this matter, the Administrative Law Judge finds that the Department has failed to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the Respondent prepared or submitted the appraisal at issue. The conflicting testimony regarding what occurred at the December 10, 2003, meeting is not sufficiently weighted in favor of the
8 Department that the Administrative Law Judge can conclude by a preponderance of the evidence that the Respondent is responsible for the appraisal. K. D. S. [1] Unless otherwise noted, all references to Minnesota Statutes are to the 2004 edition and all references to Minnesota Rules are to the 2005 edition. [2] Testimony of Respondent; Minn. Stat. 82B.02, subd. 16 (Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP)); 82B.04. [3] Testimony of Respondent. [4] Id. [5] Testimony of Patricia Stock; Ex. 1. [6] Id. [7] Testimony of Patricia Stock. [8] Id. [9] Id. [10] Testimony of Patricia Stock. [11] Testimony of Respondent; Testimony of Ed Cohen. Mr. Cohen was allowed to testify as a fact witness after the Department waived any argument that he should be disqualified as counsel for the Respondent. [12] Ex. 2; Testimony of Patricia Stock. Ms. Stock testified that she made the fold in the original document herself after receiving it. [13] Compare sketch pages contained in Exs. 1 & 2 with that contained in Ex. 3. [14] Minn. Stat , subd. 7(a)(4). [15] Minn. Stat. 82B.20, subd. 2 (5), (6), and (7). [16] Minn. R , subp. 3.A (3), (4), and (8). [17] Minn. R , subp. 5. [18] Ex. 3; Affidavit of Mark Lanterman. [19] In re Wang, 441 N.W.2d 489, (Minn. 1989).
STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
OAH 7-1005-22621-2 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE In the Matter of Nationwide Solutions, David Newman and Mitch Matthews FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
OAH 16-1005-22175-2 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE In the Matter of Modify My Loan US, LLC; Philip Domek; Mark Abdel; Maria Domek; and Richard Steele
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 10-1004-12237-2 In the Matter of the Insurance Agent License of James H. Jordan, License No. 43229. ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
CA2605342 OAH Docket No. STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE In the Matter of Data Line Credit NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR HEARING, Corporation ORDER FOR PREHEARING
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES
STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES OAH 16-1800-21068-2 In the Matter of the SIRS Appeal of Kofoworola Adeyeye FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
More informationRULE. Office of the Governor Real Estate Appraisers Board. Appraisal Management Companies (LAC 46:LXVII.Chapters 301-309)
RULE Office of the Governor Real Estate Appraisers Board Appraisal Management Companies (LAC 46:LXVII.Chapters 301-309) Under the authority of the newly enacted Appraisal Management Company Licensing and
More informationIn the Matter of the Medical License of Christopher J. Kovanda, M.D. Year of Birth: 1966 License No.: 41,657
BEFORE THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF MEDICAL PRACTICE In the Matter of the Medical License of Christopher J. Kovanda, M.D. Year of Birth: 1966 License No.: 41,657 STIPULATION AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES Before the Commissioner of Financial and Insurance Services Office of Financial and Insurance Services,
More informationMinnesota Appraisal Management Company License Application Required Forms
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 85 7th PLACE EAST, SUITE 500 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (651) 539-1599 Appraisal Management Company Application Required Forms Minnesota Statute 82C Minnesota Appraisal
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY
STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY Steve Sviggum, Commissioner, Department of Labor and Industry, OAH 3-1901-19485-2 vs. Commissioner, Building
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY
OAH 68-1901-30510 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY In the Matter of S.G.O. Roofing and Construction, MN OSH Docket No. 11191, Inspection No.
More informationIT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Jacqueline A. Moeller, Psy.D., L.P.
BEFORE THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY In the Matter of Jacqueline A. Moeller, Psy.D., L.P. License umber: LP4901 STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Jacqueline A. Moeller,
More informationNO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
05/23/2014 "See News Release 028 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM Pursuant to Supreme
More informationBEFORE THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Curtis A. Johnson, P.T.
BEFORE THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY In the Matter of the Physical Therapy License of Curtis A. Johnson, P.T. Date of Birth: 12/31/58 License Number: 2267 STIPULATION AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED
More informationDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS RE: CONSUMER SMALL LOAN LENDER ACT Application may be made on the attached forms for a Consumer Small Loan Lending license pursuant
More informationAPPLICATION FOR NATIONAL EXAMINATION IN MARITAL & FAMILY THERAPY
Minnesota Board of Marriage and Family Therapy 2829 University Avenue SE, Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3222 Telephone: (612) 617-2220 Fax: (612) 617-2221 Email: mft.board@state.mn.us Website: www.bmft.state.mn.us
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
OAH 65-1005-30057 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE In the Matter of Equity Builders, et al. ORDER ON A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT This matter came before
More informationBEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF OREGON for the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES INSURANCE DIVISION ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF OREGON for the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES INSURANCE DIVISION In the Matter of CHERIE G. SMITH and BEST INSURANCE CONSULTANTS, LLC
More informationSTATE OF CONNECTICUT REGULATION of the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION (NAME OF AGENCY)
STATE OF CONNECTICUT REGULATION of the DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION (NAME OF AGENCY) Concerning APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANIES (SUBJECT MATTER OF REGULATION) (NEW) Section 1. The Regulations of Connecticut
More information, Plaintiff, Defendant., Esq., appeared on behalf of the petitioning
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF vs., Plaintiff, DISTRICT COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Personal Injury File No.: Judge: Defendant., UNIFM FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND DER TO APPROVE MIN
More informationIntroduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665.
Introduction On January 1, 2000, California's Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (Government Code sections 8547 et seq.) was significantly amended. The Legislature amended this law to strengthen protections
More information[Cite as Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Cameron, 130 Ohio St.3d 299, 2011-Ohio-5200.]
[Cite as Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Cameron, 130 Ohio St.3d 299, 2011-Ohio-5200.] MEDINA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. CAMERON. [Cite as Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Cameron, 130 Ohio St.3d 299, 2011-Ohio-5200.]
More informationHow To Get A $1,000 Filing Fee From A Bankruptcy Filing Fee In Arkansas
BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A IN RE: DONALD W. COLSON ARKANSAS BAR ID No. 2005166 CPC Docket No. 2013-008 FINDINGS AND ORDER Donald W. Colson is an attorney licensed
More informationPUBLISHED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BY THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
This information has been prepared for persons who wish to make or have made a complaint to The Lawyer Disciplinary Board about a lawyer. Please read it carefully. It explains the disciplinary procedures
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2012 WI 123 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thomas E. Bielinski, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Thomas
More informationAPPLICATION FOR THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE THERAPIST LICENSE
APPLICATION FOR THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE THERAPIST LICENSE CITY ADMINISTRATOR S OFFICE 1307 Cloquet Avenue, Cloquet MN 55720 Phone: 218-879-3347 Fax: 218-879-6555 www.ci.cloquet.mn.us email: djohnson@ci.cloquet.mn.us
More information1. The Minnesota Board of Dentistry ("Board") is authorized pursuant to Minnesota
BEFORE THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF DENTISTRY In the Matter of Thomas M. Garvin, D.D.S. License No. D9881 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONDITIONAL LICENSE STIPULATION Thomas M. Garvin, D.D.S. ("Licensee") and the
More informationBEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A CONSENT FINDINGS & ORDER
BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL A IN RE: PAUL N. FORD - Respondent Attorney Arkansas Bar ID # 87060 CPC Docket No. 2013-046 CONSENT FINDINGS & ORDER The formal charges
More informationMinnesota False Claims Act
Minnesota False Claims Act (Minn. Stat. 15C.01 to.16) i 15C.01 DEFINITIONS Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. Claim.
More informationFinancial Services, Inc., ("Respondents" or "AEFA") is a broker dealer registered in the state of
SE2502055/DPK STATE OF MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE In the Matter of American Express Financial Advisors Inc. CRDNo. 6363 and American Express Financial Corporation CRD No. 6320 CONSENT ORDER TO:
More informationDEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
TITLE 38: FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CHAPTER I: INSTITUTIONS PART 140 DEBT MANAGEMENT SERVICE ACT Section 140.10 Office Records 140.20 Bank Account 140.30 Dual Business (Repealed) 140.40 License 140.50 General
More informationMINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT
. MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT Sec. 24. [15C.01] DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1. Scope. For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. Claim. "Claim" includes
More information: SCHOOL ETHICS COMMISSION
: IN THE MATTER : BEFORE THE : SCHOOL ETHICS COMMISSION OF : : Docket No.: C11-03 WILLIAM PATTERSON : SOMERDALE BOARD OF EDUCATION : DECISION CAMDEN COUNTY : : PROCEDURAL HISTORY The above matter arises
More informationMASSAGE THERAPY CERTIFICATE 2016 LICENSE APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, MN 55447 763-509-5000
MASSAGE THERAPY CERTIFICATE 2016 LICENSE APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, MN 55447 763-509-5000 The following application forms must be completed, by the individual
More information7.3 PREHEARING CONFERENCES AND SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES
7.3 PREHEARING CONFERENCES AND SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES 7.3.1 Prehearing Conferences A contested case is commenced when the notice of and order for hearing or other authorized pleading is served by the agency.
More informationFrequently Asked Questions for Residential Mortgage Originator and Servicer
What are the requirements to be licensed as a residential mortgage originator under Chapter 58? Significant changes were made to Chapter 58 by the 2007 legislation. Effective August 1, 2007, a mortgage
More informationSETTLEGOODE v. PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al CV-00-313-ST JURY INSTRUCTIONS FOLLOWING CLOSE OF EVIDENCE
SETTLEGOODE v. PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al CV-00-313-ST JURY INSTRUCTIONS FOLLOWING CLOSE OF EVIDENCE These instructions will be in three parts: first, general rules that define and control your duties
More informationBy: Alvin C. Monshower, Jr., Esq.
THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY: THE SAGA OF YOUR LICENSE RENEWAL By: Alvin C. Monshower, Jr., Esq. It is a rite of passage which all real estate licensees face every 2 years... LICENSE RENEWAL! You go
More informationWISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REGULATION & LICENSING
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REGULATION & LICENSING Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing Access to the Public Records of the Reports of Decisions This Reports of Decisions document was retrieved from
More informationPeter Tom, Justice Presiding, Angela M. Mazzarelli Eugene Nardelli Luis A. Gonzalez Bernard J. Malone, Jr., Justices.
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Peter Tom, Justice Presiding, Angela M. Mazzarelli Eugene Nardelli Luis A. Gonzalez Bernard J. Malone, Jr., Justices. ---------------------------------------x
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WINSTON-SALEM DIVISION
SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 22nd day of February, 2013. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WINSTON-SALEM DIVISION In re: Joseph Walter Melara and Shyrell Lynn Melara, Case No.
More informationPresenting Property Tax Appeals. Minnesota Tax Court
Presenting Property Tax Appeals to the Minnesota Tax Court Minnesota Tax Court 245 Minnesota Judicial Center 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 (651) 296-2806 www.taxcourt.state.mn.us
More informationSec. 90-27. Certificates of use.
Sec. 90-27. Certificates of use. (1) It is hereby deemed unlawful for any person to open or operate any business and/or occupy any structure within the town limits for the privilege of engaging in any
More information1. The Minnesota Board of Dentistry ("Board") is authorized pursuant to Minnesota
BEFORE THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF DENTISTRY In the Matter of Robert H. Cheney, D.D.S License No. D11152 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR STAYED SUSPENSION AND CONDITIONAL LICENSE STIPULATION Robert H. Cheney, D.D.S.
More informationLaw Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights. Sections 112.532-534, F.S. 112.532 Law enforcement officers' and correctional officers' rights.
Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights Sections 112.532-534, F.S. 112.532 Law enforcement officers' and correctional officers' rights.-- All law enforcement officers and correctional officers employed
More informationThis chapter shall be known and cited as the alarm systems code. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to the incorporated area of the city.
Chapter 2A ALARM SYSTEMS Section 2A-1. Short Title. [Ord. No. 557, 1] This chapter shall be known and cited as the alarm systems code. Section 2A-2. Scope. [Ord. No. 557, 1] The provisions of this chapter
More informationFINAL ORDER Effective: 11/08/2004
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of the Kansas Resident ) Insurance Agent s License of ) Docket No. 3391-SO KEN CAMPBELL ) FINAL ORDER Effective: 11/08/2004 SUMMARY
More informationCITY OF CLOQUET, MN APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC DANCE LICENSE
CITY OF CLOQUET, MN APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC DANCE LICENSE CITY ADMINISTRATOR S OFFICE 1307 Cloquet Avenue, Cloquet MN 55720 Phone: 218-879-3347 Fax: 218-879-6555 www.ci.cloquet.mn.us email: admin@ci.cloquet.mn.us
More informationSECRETARY OF HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TIMOTHY P. MURRAY LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation DIVISION OF INSURANCE 1000 Washington Street, Suite 810 Boston, MA 02118-6200 (617) 521-7794 FAX (617) 521-7475 TTY/TDD
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
1 1 [attorney name redacted], Esq. (CSBN ///////////) ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// Attorneys for Defendant Mary Hinds Note: all names have been changed. Ted
More informationMASSAGE THERAPIST LICENSE APPLICATION. SSN: MN Tax ID: FEIN: City: State: ZIP Code:
Name (first middle last): 1620 MAPLE AVENUE P.O. BOX 97 MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 (763) 479-0515 MASSAGE THERAPIST LICENSE APPLICATION Other Name Applicant may be known as: of birth: Place of birth: Current
More informationBEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of the Kansas Resident ) Insurance Agent s License of ) Frank Dean Barber ) NPN # 923632, ) The Kansas Resident Insurance Agency
More informationAITKIN COUNTY GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Aitkin County
AITKIN COUNTY GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT Aitkin County Adopted by the Aitkin County Board of Commissioners July 28, 2015 To the extent that the Minnesota Government
More informationWREN ROBICHAUX NO. 2012-CA-0265 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF PRACTICAL NURSE EXAMINERS FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
WREN ROBICHAUX VERSUS LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF PRACTICAL NURSE EXAMINERS * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2012-CA-0265 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY SERVICES BUREAU OF HEARINGS In the matter of Bureau of Health Services, Petitioner v Marie L. Falquet, Respondent / Docket No. 2000-1297 Agency No.
More informationVERMONT DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, INSURANCE, SECURITIES AND HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION FOR COMPLETING BIOGRAPHICAL REPORT
Attachment B (5/2000) VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, INSURANCE, SECURITIES AND HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION FOR COMPLETING BIOGRAPHICAL REPORT Biographical Reports must be filed by each director,
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-1834 Keith Welsh, Appellant, vs. Auto-Owners
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2015 WI 104 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Richard W. Voss, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Richard
More informationRepresenting Whistleblowers Nationwide
Minnesota False Claims Act Minnesota Stat. 15C.01 to 15C.16) 15C.01 DEFINITIONS Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. Claim.
More informationIN RE: MAUREEN STRETCH NO. BD-2012-091 S.J.C. Order of Term Suspension entered by Justice Lenk on October 2, 2012. 1 SUMMARY 2
IN RE: MAUREEN STRETCH NO. BD-2012-091 S.J.C. Order of Term Suspension entered by Justice Lenk on October 2, 2012. 1 SUMMARY 2 The respondent received a six-month suspension with conditions for her misconduct
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE
IN2006087PEG STATE OF MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE In the Matter of Southwestern Life Insurance Company, a Texas corporation not licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota. NAIC No. 91391
More informationINTRODUCTION TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO SUE OR NOT TO SUE? HOW TO FILE A SMALL CLAIMS CASE WHERE TO FILE FILING FEE NOTICE TO THE DEFENDANT COUNTERCLAIMS PREPARING FOR TRIAL
More informationHearings and Appeals. Your Right to Appeal under Food Stamps (SNAP), TANF, Refugee Cash Assistance and Medicaid/Hoosier Healthwise
Hearings and Appeals Your Right to Appeal under Food Stamps (SNAP), TANF, Refugee Cash Assistance and Medicaid/Hoosier Healthwise If you believe there is an excessive delay in the processing of your application
More informationTRUE AND EXACT. COpy OF ORIGINAL
BEFORE THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF MEDICAL PRACTICE TRUE AND EXACT. COpy OF ORIGINAL COMPLAINT REVIEW COMMITTEE In the Matter of the Medical License of Rick L. Nissen License Number: 30,501 AGREEMENT FOR CORRECTIVE
More informationAPPLICANT INFORMATION (please print or type)
STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 85 7 TH PLACE EAST, SUITE 600 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (651) 539-1599 (For Department Use Only) DESIGNATED HOME STATE BUSINESS ENTITY INSURANCE ADJUSTER LICENSE
More informationSTATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING In re: J.H.S. Moxie Corp., and Jacqueline O Shaughnessy, Respondent. * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 STIPULATED
More informationData Practices Policy for Data Subjects Data about You
CITY OF LAKEVILLE Data Practices Policy for Data Subjects Data about You City of Lakeville www.lakevillemn.gov January 2015 The Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13) says that
More informationSUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2015 WI 2 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Emory H. Booker, III, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Emory
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS IN THE MATTER OF THE RENEWAL APPLICATION OF: Arizona Valley Roofing Inc. License No. K-.01-D. No. 01A-1-ROC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 HEARING:
More informationNO. 03-B-0910 IN RE: HARRY E. CANTRELL, JR. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
05/02/03 See News Release 032 for any concurrences and/or dissents. SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 03-B-0910 IN RE: HARRY E. CANTRELL, JR. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This matter arises
More informationBEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS FINAL ORDER Effective: 04-22-09 the Kansas Resident ) Insurance Agent s License of ) Docket No. 3977--SO MICHAEL E. DAVIN ) NPN/License No. 4916356
More informationSupreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway New York, New York 10006 (212) 401-0800 (212) 287-1045 FAX
Departmental Disciplinary Committee Supreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department 61 Broadway (212) 401-0800 (212) 287-1045 FAX HOW TO FILE A COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION When you hire a lawyer
More informationDivision of Insurance, Petitioner v. Lisa Sue Mize, Respondent Docket No. E2009-03. Order on Petitioner's Motion for Summary Decision
Division of Insurance, Petitioner v. Lisa Sue Mize, Respondent Docket No. E2009-03 Introduction and Procedural History Order on Petitioner's Motion for Summary Decision On February 20, 2009, the Division
More informationTitle 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
31.02.01.00 Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION Subtitle 02 POWERS AND DUTIES HEARINGS Chapter 01 Hearings Authority: Insurance Article, 2-109 and 2-205 2-215; State Government Article, 10-206;
More information) IN RE: ) BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY ) COMPANY, GARY R. SMITH, ) CONSENT AGREEMENT MARK D. LECLERC, AND ) JOHN A. HOLT, ) DOCKET NO.
) IN RE: ) BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY ) COMPANY, GARY R. SMITH, ) CONSENT AGREEMENT MARK D. LECLERC, AND ) JOHN A. HOLT, ) DOCKET NO. INS-04-2001 ) ) INTRODUCTION John A. Holt, the Superintendent of the
More informationI. POLICY: DEFINITIONS:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: { } All DJJ Staff { } Administration {x} Community Services {x} Secure Facilities (RYDCs) Transmittal # 15-07 Policy # 20.41 Related Standards & References:
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR STORY COUNTY
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR STORY COUNTY YEMPABOU PALO, Petitioner, No. CVCV048520 vs. IOWA BOARD OF REGENTS, RULING Respondent. On the 10th day of January, 2014, Petitioner s Interlocutory Motion for
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals No. 13-1186 For the Seventh Circuit IN RE: JAMES G. HERMAN, Debtor-Appellee. APPEAL OF: JOHN P. MILLER Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Appraisal Management Company Registration Act.
Appraisal Management Company Registration Act 63 P.S. 457.21 457.31 (Current through 02/02/2012) (When referring to section numbers, use a truncated version of the number after the decimal point. For example,
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY 1 OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY 1 OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, Complainant, v. RESPONDENT 2, Disciplinary Proceeding No. 20050000720-02 HEARING PANEL DECISION Hearing Officer
More informationINDIANA BOARD OF TAX REVIEW Small Claims Final Determination Findings and Conclusions
INDIANA BOARD OF TAX REVIEW Small Claims Final Determination Findings and Conclusions Petition: 71-026-02-1-5-00163 Petitioner: Respondent: Portage Township Assessor (St. Joseph County) Parcel: 18-5036-1257
More informationFINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS, AND ORDER
STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 11-6361-17155-CV Will Rossbach, vs. Complainant, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS, AND ORDER Erik Hjelle and Erik Hjelle and Associates, Inc., Respondents.
More informationADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF ROBESON 11 OSP 05886 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF ROBESON 11 OSP 05886 Sheila Beck-Jones, Petitioner, vs. Hoke County Department of Social Services, Respondent. DECISION This contested
More informationAPPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPRAISER LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION BOARD APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY STATUTES 1 ARKANSAS APPRAISER LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION BOARD APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY STATUTES SUBCHAPTER
More informationCHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES
CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES Section 1. Authority. These Uniform County Board of Equalization Practice and Procedure Rules are promulgated by authority of
More informationApplication for Licensing as an Occupational Therapist or Occupational Therapy Assistant
Health Occupations Program Attn: Kim Ruberg P.O. Box 64882 St. Paul, MN 55164-0882 (651) 201-3725 TDD: (651) 201-5797 For office use only Application for Licensing as an Occupational Therapist or Occupational
More informationS.B. 88 126th General Assembly (As Introduced)
Elizabeth Dominic Bill Analysis Legislative Service Commission S.B. 88 126th General Assembly (As Introduced) Sens. Coughlin, Goodman BILL SUMMARY Requires the Superintendent of Insurance to establish
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0288 Thai Ginger Restaurant, Inc., et al., Relators,
More informationBart Posey vs. COMMERCE AND INSURANCE
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-11-2013 Bart Posey vs. COMMERCE
More informationWhat to Do When Your Witness Testimony Doesn t Match His or Her Declaration
What to Do When Your Witness Testimony Doesn t Match His or Her Declaration Russell R. Yurk Jennings, Haug & Cunningham, L.L.P. 2800 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1800 Phoenix, AZ 85004-1049 (602) 234-7819
More information6 th Floor, Bulkley Building SCOTT MYERS 1501 Euclid Avenue 30 East Broad Street, 26 th Floor Cleveland, OH 44115 Columbus, OH 43215
[Cite as Workman v. Ohio Dept. of Ins., 2012-Ohio-4809.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT VAN A. WORKMAN -vs- OHIO DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE Plaintiff-Appellant Defendant-Appellee
More informationPeople v. Fischer. 09PDJ016. May 7, 2010. Attorney Regulation. Following a Sanctions Hearing, a Hearing Board suspended Erik G.
People v. Fischer. 09PDJ016. May 7, 2010. Attorney Regulation. Following a Sanctions Hearing, a Hearing Board suspended Erik G. Fischer (Attorney Registration No. 16856) from the practice of law for a
More information13 LC 37 1568ER. Senate Bill 202 By: Senators Unterman of the 45th, Mullis of the 53rd and Chance of the 16th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
Senate Bill 202 By: Senators Unterman of the 45th, Mullis of the 53rd and Chance of the 16th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT 1 2 3 4 To amend Article 5 of Chapter 8 of Title 31 of the Official Code of Georgia
More informationREINSURANCE INTERMEDIARY
Minnesota Department of Commerce Licensing Division 85-7 th Place East, Suite 600 St. Paul, MN 55101-3165 651-539-1600 (For Department Use Only) REINSURANCE INTERMEDIARY PROCESSING DATE LICENSE NUMBER
More informationBEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE REAL ESTATE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE REAL ESTATE COMMISSION In the Matter of: ) ) TABITHA R. SCOTT ) ) Agency Case No. 2010-000442 DECISION I. Introduction Tabitha Scott
More informationCase 3:02-cv-00181-AVC Document 73-2 Filed 02/17/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:02-cv-00181-AVC Document 73-2 Filed 02/17/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT GARY ZIMMERMAN : NO.: 3:02 CV0181 (AVC) Plaintiff : : VS. : : GARY COHEN : February
More informationBEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL : No. 891 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 79 DB 2002 v. : : Attorney Registration No. 60044
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LOCAL RULES: ENTRY The following local rules are adopted to govern the practice and procedures of this Court, subject
More informationCase 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION MURIELLE MOLIERE, Plaintiff, v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE, et al., Defendants.
More informationCredit Services Organization Act 24 O.S. 131 148
Credit Services Organization Act 24 O.S. 131 148 Chapter 8 Credit Services Organization Act Section 131 Short Title This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Credit Services Organization Act". Added
More information