1 1 What to Teach? Computational Science as an Improved Model for Science Education (Submitted 29 March 2008 to Microsoft Research RFP Computational Education for Scientists What to Teach? ) Rubin H Landau Director, Computational Physics for Undergraduates Program (CPUG) Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon Abstract It is evident that computation has fundamentally changed research and development in most every field of science. This paper argues for concordant changes in science education that extend beyond using computers to teach traditional science better. Results will be presented from surveys of existing computational science degree programs that reveal a consensus of topics essential for the computational education of scientists. Detailed concept maps will be given, showing how educators are combining computer science and applied mathematics with a traditional discipline in order to teach how to solve realistic problems. It is proposed that teaching based on this research like, problem solving approach is a more motivating and efficient technique than teaching the various disciplines separately. Because it may be difficult for a single college or university to offer all of the essential topics, a number of early developers are placing elearning modules from their courses together as part of a national repository. CS hard/software Application science C S E Figure 1. Computational Science & Engineering (CSE) as a multidisciplinary endeavor connecting computer science with mathematics and applications. In this view CSE is more than just the overlap of traditional disciplines. Changes in Science Drive What and How to Teach The historically rapid adoption of computation as an essential element in all areas of science and engineering has progressed faster than the concordant changes in education. Although many traditional science disciplines are incorporating computers to enhance education in those disciplines, the education too often presents computation as a black box whose inner workings need not be understood. (Some of the published evidence of this comes from Winch survey s finding that few classes that incorporate computation as a course element actually examine the students about it [Winch].) Given the newfound and fundamental importance of
2 2 computation in so many disciplines, and the fact that many graduates of the traditional disciplines actually end up employed as computational scientists (proof to follow), we propose that students and society as a whole would be better served if the traditional science disciplines taught an understanding of computation as part of their science. In this paper we use the terms computational science or CSE to denote the multidisciplinary combination of techniques, tools and knowledge developed in the 1970 s and 1980 s to solve scientific and engineering problems through computer simulation. In terms of disciplines (Figure 1), it is a combination of mathematics and computer science with a field such as physics, chemistry, automotive engineering, etc. In our view, there also needs to be a central core (inner circle) based on a common toolset and mindset that draws the disciplines together. Teaching CSE encompasses the integration of modern research tools and subjects into undergraduate education, integration that US News & World Report considers a hallmark of a high quality education. Much of this paper will detail those subjects and tools. Figure 2. Importance of knowledge areas for physics bachelors, 5 7 years after graduation. The light (blue) bars are for graduates whose primary field of employment is engineering, mathematics and science; the dark bars are for graduates employed in software. The Need for Computational Education It is wise to look in the cupboard before making up your shopping list. Likewise, it is prudent to look at what subjects are currently taught and what subjects students need after they graduate, before deciding to change your curriculum. We start by looking at the results of a survey of physics bachelors conducted by the American Institute of Physics that determined which aspects of their education are most valuable in their current employment five years after graduation [AIP]. The results, shown in Figure 2, indicate that for graduates whose
3 3 primary field of employment is engineering, mathematics and science, the three most important skills are scientific problem solving, synthesizing information, and mathematical skills. These skills are also highly important for graduates who find employment related to software. While it is to be expected that knowledge of software and programming are most important for graduates in software development, notice how, otherwise, synthesizing information is the most important skill for both groups, and that knowledge of physics is essentially the least important. (And these numbers come from the AIP!). Figure 3. Time spent on activities (top blue bar) compared to rating of education (lower red bar). The categories are team work skills, lab skills, scientific software, and programming. That same survey also examined (Figure 3) the importance graduates give to various activities as compared to their education in these activities. We see that while physics departments appear to be spending a proper amount of time on lab skills, their student might benefit if there was more time spent on scientific software, programming, and team skills. Although we have focused on physics here, there is evidence that similar observations hold in other fields. For example, a National Science Board report [NSB] indicates that only 22% of physics and biology undergraduates remain in the field from which they graduate, with the number rising to only 52% at the graduate level. To get an idea of just where they go, look at Figure 4, which shows the fields of employment for the physics bachelors of 2003 and Notice on the left that most bachelors (53%) are employed by the private sector, with only
4 4 12% going into colleges and university. Notice on the right that of those bachelors employed by the private sector, about one third assume non science, technology, engineering, or mathematics positions, about one third do engineering work, and about one quarter do technology work. This leaves only 13% to do physics or some other science. The conclusion we draw from these figures is that while a traditional disciplinary may provide good preparation for a student s career, overemphasizing the specific discipline tends to weaken the preparation. Figure 4. Left: the initial employment sectors for the physics bachelors of 2003 and Right: The fields of employment for those graduates employed in the private sector. Now that we have documented the need for computation in science education, the next step is to determine if that need is being met. Figure 5 shows the results of a survey of the curricula of undergraduate programs in computer science (CS), physics (PH), computational science (CSE), and computational physics (CP) [Y&L]. The survey made the, admittedly crude, categorization of courses as Computing, Mathematics, Applications, and Other (whatever is left), and then displayed the results as the average percentage of the total curriculum dedicated to each category. The left column in Figure 5 shows the strong Computing (black) but weak Application (white) components in the Computer Science degree; the right column shows the strong Application but weak Computing components in the Physics degree. The middle columns show that the Computational Physics and Computational Science programs tend to provide a similar, uniform balance among Math, Computing and Application. So while these computational degrees provide less physics than a physics degree and less computing than a CS degree, the balance may be healthier. These numbers agree with our impression (prejudice?) that regular physics undergraduates do not learn enough about computation, and that regular CS undergraduates do not learn enough about math and science (there is of course much math in some CS classes). In summary, there appears to be a demand for mathematics, computational, and problem solving skills in the work place, as well as for providing a science education that can be applied to a variety of fields of employment.
5 5 Whether individual disciplines, with the natural pressure to get students to understand subjects the way the professors do (and thus teach even more of the discipline), can provide a proper computational education is unclear. However, computational science is still a young and developing field with no set curriculum, and I believe that it will take groups of interested parties to help decide what topics should be taught, and in which courses they may be included. Figure 5. (Bottom up): average % of classes taken in Computation, Math, Application, and all Other subjects for majors in (left to right) CS, CSE, Computational Physics, and Physics. Present Computational Education Programs For the past 25 years, individual graduate students have combined courses in mathematics, computer science and a traditional discipline in an ad hoc approach to obtaining a computational education. In that time, computational science has continued to mature, as has the power and pervasiveness of computers in science. This has led to formal degree programs at the graduate level, and more recently at the undergraduate level. Nevertheless, a bachelor's degree in any of the computational sciences is rare, as we see in Table 1 which lists the US and foreign undergraduate degree programs in all the computational sciences. Table 1. Undergraduate degree programs in all computational sciences. Computational Math Comput Science Computational Phys Foreign Programs 1. Arizona State 2. CUNY Brooklyn 1. Stanford (+Math) 1. Houghton C 1. Australian Nat 3. Michigan State 2. SUNY Brockport 2. Illinois State 2. Kanazawawa Japan (CSE) 4. Missouri So State 3. Stevins Inst Tech 3. Oregon State 3. National U Singapore (CSE) 5. Rice 4. UC Berkeley 4. SUNY Buffalo 4. Trinity C, Dublin (CP) 6. Rochester Inst Tech 5. Chris Newport 5. U Calgary (CSE) 7. Seattle Pacific 6. U Erlangen Nurnberg (CSE) 8. Saginaw Valley State Computational Bio 7. U Waterloo (CSE) 9. San Jose State 8. Utrecht U (CSE) 10. U Chicago 1. Carnegie Mellon 11. U Illinois Chicago 2. U Pennsylvania
6 6 Yet a degree is not the only way to learn a subject, and so in Table 2 we list computational programs that are not formal degrees, but may well provide an equivalent education. Table 2. Minors, Concentrations, Tracks, Emphases, Options, Foci, etc. Computational Biology Computational Science Computational Physics 1. Capital 1. UC Merced 2. Clark 1. Abilene Christian 2. Center CB (Colo) 3. Old Dominion 2. North Carolina State 4. RPI 3. Penn State Erie Computational Mathematics 5. Salve Regina 4. U Arkansas 6. Syracuse 1. Princeton (App & CM) 7. U Wisconsin Eau Claire 2. San Diego State (App & CM) 8. U Wisconsin LaCrosse 3. U Central Florida 9. U Wisconsin Madison 4. U Nebraska Lincoln 10. Wittenberg 11. Wofford C These tables are updated versions of the surveys by Swanson [Swan] and Osman and Landau [Y&L]. These tables may not be complete since we have tried to make them realistic by including only active undergraduate programs, and have excluded some programs that appear to be dual degree programs, without computational bridge courses that draw the disciplines together. As you can see, the number of programs (51) is small, with Computational Mathematics (which may or may not have a strong Application content) and Computational Science being the most popular ones. While small, this number is about four times larger than the number we found in 2001 when we assembled a similar list, and so the field is growing. Of course, there may well come a time when computation is so integrated into the disciplines that the existence of programs such as these will be viewed as a temporary, transitional trend. Time will tell. Framework for Teaching Science with Computation Figure 6 illustrates the scientific problem solving paradigm that is at the core of computational research. Although diagrams such as Figures 1 and 6 have been shown often enough to become visual clichés, they remain relevant to the focus of this paper since they provide the general structure for computational education. In fact, we believe that the commonality of tools across the computational sciences combined with the common problem solving mindset is a truly liberating and attractive aspect of computational science because it permits its practitioners to understand and participate in a much wider set of problems than occurs otherwise in the sub specialization of science.
7 7 Figure 6. The scientific problem solving paradigm. A problem is set, the tools from multiple disciplines are employed within context, and the continual assessment aides debugging and steering. In general, we recommend that computational educational materials be structured around the scientific problem solving paradigm in Figure 6. This demonstrates where the multiples disciplines are relevant, provides concrete examples that assist in understanding the abstract concepts, and stresses the importance of assessment of the various components through visualization. From a pedagogical perspective, we believe that a Computational X education following the problem solving paradigm is a more efficient approach to undergraduate education than a pure X education ( X refers to a specific discipline). Although students may take fewer X classes, they tend to learn the X, CS, and math better when placed in context, and thus get more out of their courses. So even if the number of X courses needs to be reduced to make room for teaching computation, this is compensated for by the increased efficiency of the pedagogy. Furthermore, this approach has been shown to be appealing to a more diverse group than those presently attracted to computer science or physics [LEAD]. A key component of many computational programs is having students get actively engaged with projects as if each were an original scientific investigation, and having projects in a large number of areas. In this way students experience the excitement of their personal research, get familiar with a large number of approaches, acquire confidence in making a complex system work for them, and continually build upon their accomplishments. We have found the project approach to be flexible and to encourage students to take pride in their work and their creativity. It also works well for independent study or distant learning. In order to teach a projects based course, we employ a combination of lectures and ``over the shoulder'' labs. The students work on and discuss their projects with an instructor, and then write them up as an ``executive summary'' containing sections for Problem Algorithm Visualization Equations employed Code Discussion & Critique The emphasis is professional, much like reporting to manager in a workplace. Visualizations are important for all the classes, and we teach the use of Maple/Mathematica, PtPlot, gnuplot, AceGr, and OpenDX for 2 D, 3 D, and animated plots (long lists of resources available to a computation class can be found in [CP 2]). Taken together, this approach produces significant learning, even though we may be ``teaching with our mouths shut'' [Fink]. What to Teach At present there is no professional organization of computational scientists or accreditation body to decide the proper content for an education that can be called ``computational''. However, a number of interest groups have been working on this, including the NSF supported Computational Science Curriculum Virtual Institute [CSCVI] and TerraGrid [Terra], the DOE supported Krell Institute [Krell], the Computing in Science & Engineering
8 8 magazine, the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics [SIAM] and the American Association of Physics Teachers [CPC]. The CSCVI (in which the author was a member) researched the existing CSE degree programs and confirmed earlier findings [Y&L] of a consensus regarding the basic elements of computational science curriculum. We tabulate the basic elements in Table 3, where Computational X refers to courses relevant to a specific discipline (often the central bridge in Figure 1). Table 3. Common basic elements in existing CSE programs. Computer architecture Scientific computing systems Parallel processing Programming / Parallel programming Software engineering Scientific visualization Design and implementation of database systems Computer simulation Numerical algorithms and analysis Combinatorial algorithms Design and analysis of algorithms Computational X Applied mathematics The CSCVI project initiated the task of providing a repository of key curriculum subjects using the internet based Visual Understanding Environment [VUE]. This technology is designed for managing and integrating digital resources in support of learning, and was used to create the concept maps that we will soon show. These maps are graphical representations of subjects or concepts that demonstrate how the concepts relate to one another, and can be used to outline a recommended path to be followed through the materials for mastering them. The maps below present our major suggestions as to what should be taught when combining science with computation. We recommend that the maps be read at least as carefully as a text. Figure 7. A concept map of the generic student learning outcomes for computational education.
9 9 An important prerequisite for the establishment of any course or educational program is the determination of student learning outcomes (SLO s). This is especially true for CSE where it is (all too) easy to expect an individual course to teach students everything they need to know about computation [Yas]. Historically, SLO's have been guided by research needs, that is, in a ``top down'' fashion in which a graduate student s program committee prescribed what areas need to be studied for an individual thesis project. In Figure 7 we present, in concept map form, some generic SLO s for computation classes and their relations to the basic elements above. As you can see, the SLO s are separated by disciplines, although there is much overlap (as there should be for a multidisciplinary program). Note that in Figure 7 and the maps below we do not try to list all elements in a student s curriculum, but rather just those related to computation. For example, the Math subjects are all applied, while a student would also take some general or pure math classes. Likewise, we do not list traditional subjects for the Application areas. In Figure 8 we present a generic concept map of the type we would distribute to teachers to help them design a Figure 8. A generic concept map used to design a course in Computational X. Figure 8. A generic concept map used distributed to aid in designing a Computational X course. Computational X course. The basic elements of Computational X are suggested, and there are blank blocks included for instructor customization. The VUE software makes it very easy to create and modify maps, as well as to add connecting arrows indicating relations or ordering among the concepts, with further information placed on the arrows if desired. While multiply connected maps are useful for visualizing a subject, they tend to be overwhelming for a paper such as this and so we have removed most. In Figure 9 we present a concept map for our Computational Physics course and text [Survey]. In Figure 10 we present a concept map for a Computational Finance created independently [CSCVI]. These maps are valuable in that they indicate what two computational science teachers are now teaching in two very different courses, and how they are organizing the materials. It is illuminating to contrast these maps. Superficially, we notice that the physics map is laid out in a columnar, top down style, which makes it easier to read the entries than the radial style used in the finance map; however, it may be easier and clearer to see the relations among concepts in the finance map. We cannot say which is more effective.
10 10 When we look at the actual concepts in the two maps, we notice that the Math and Applications elements are very similar in the two, with the finance map giving more application specifics, but fewer CS concepts. Although not shown here, my design of the physics map is to keep the concepts general (which is why they are called concepts ), but then link individual elements to specific topics. In turn, when the specific topics are linked to the digital content that we have developed, which converts the concept map into a content map (a research project of the author). The detailed topics are: Figure 9. A Computational Physics concept map.
11 11 The Advanced Computational Laboratory is the equivalent of the classic advanced experimental lab using dusty old graduate theses setups. In the computational version, seniors run dusty deck simulations that were once M.S. and Ph.D. thesis projects. The students get the codes running, investigate some suggested problems, make modifications of the codes themselves, and compare the results to those published in the literature. For many students this is their first experience with truly large and legacy programs, and with reading an article in the scientific literature. Figure 10. A Computational Finance concept map. In Figures 11 and 12 we present CSCVI concept maps for individual courses in the Design of Databases and in Numerical and Error Analysis. Again, one developer chose a radial style and the other a columnar style. The database map is seen to be specialized to just this one particular subject, and thus without the blending of disciplines and with little in common to the other maps show. The numerical analysis class map in Figure 12, while still for just one course, is seen to have a great deal of overlap with the computational X classes, with this map naturally giving more detail than those covering a broader field. Whether all of these numerical analysis topics are best taught in one course or taught in context in Computational X classes, is probably best decided by
12 12 local conditions. In my experience, the Computational X classes may teach one or two versions of these methods as needed in some application, but not give a detailed investigation of issues such as convergence and stability. In that case, there would be good reason to teach both classes. As always, one can argue about the best methods and techniques, but these maps are specific examples of what is being taught. Figure 11. A concept map for a course in the Design of Databases. Figure 12. A concept map for a course in Numerical and Error Analysis.
13 13 Putting Pieces Together: A Sample Computational Curriculum After two years in administrative processing, in October 2001 the Oregon State Board of Higher Education approved a Bachelor degree in Computational Physics [CPUG]. The first students entered in fall 2002, the first graduate left in June 2003, and 3 5 students typically graduate each year. Although these numbers are small, the classes are well attended by physics majors, graduate students, and engineering students. A sample of the Computational Physics curriculum is given in Table 6. It is an example of how a complete package of computation classes can be fit into a four year curriculum that is still strong in its mother discipline. Table 6. A sample CPUG (CP for UnderGraduates) curriculum. Computation classes in bold. Year Fall Winter Spring Fresh Differential Calculus (MTH 251, 4) Writing I, 3 Gen Chemistry (CH 221, 5) Perspective, 3 I. Scientific Computing 1 (Ph/MTH 265, 3) Integral Calculus (MTH 252, 4) Perspective, 3 Gen Chemistry (CH 222, 5) CP Seminar (PH 405, 1) Vector Calculus I (MTH 254, 4) Gen Physics + Calc (Ph 211, 5 ) Gen Chemistry (CH 222, 5) Soph II. Scientific Computing 2 (PH 464, 3) Vector Calculus II (MTH 255, 4) Gen Physics + Calc (PH 212, 5) Perspective, 3 Jr CS Elective, 3 Harmonic Oscillations (PH 321, 2) Static Vector Fields (PH 322, 2) Energy & Entropy (PH 323, 2) Biology, 4 Elective, 3 Sr III. CP 1 (PH 465, 3) Electromagnetism (PH 431, 3) Quantum Mechanics (PH 451, 3) Math Methods (PH 461, 3) Electives, 3 Infinite Series & Sequences (MTH 253, 4) Gen Physics + Calc (PH 213, 5) Perspective, 3 Writing II, 3 Perspective, 3 Waves in 1D (PH 424, 2) Quant Measurements (PH 425, 2) Central Forces (PH 426, 2) Synthesis, 3 Elective, 3 IV. CP 2 (PH 466, 3) Physical Optics (PH 481, 4) Computer Science Elective, 3 Elective, 3 Applied Differential Eqs (MTH 256, 4) Intro Modern Phys (PH 314, 4) Writing III, 3 Fitness, 3 Linear Algebra (MTH 341, 3) Computer Science Elective, 3 CP Seminar (PH 405, 1) Periodic Systems (PH 427, 2) Classical Mechanics (PH 435, 3) Electives, 6 V. Adv Computational Lab Thesis (PH 467, 401; 3, 3) CP Seminar (PH 405, 1) Synthesis, 3 Electives, 4 Interactive Multimedia (CS 395, 4)
14 14 This curriculum has been built up course by course since 1989 as we proposed, developed, taught, and modified new courses. The computer classes (bold) are seen to be distributed throughout all years of study. In total, the curriculum is a mix of existing applied math and CS classes, with the new computation classes acting as the glue that holds it together. There is another way to answer the questions what to teach? and How to teach it? That way is to provide computation based textbooks that help define which topics constitute proper computational education, and provide a coherent presentation of the subject. The OSU CP Education group has been trying to do that for the last 15 years. Lists of more than 50 texts and other resources (predominantly not from us!) are to be found in a recent resource letter [CP 2]. Although most of those resources and most of this paper focus on more specialized computational topics, there is still very much an open question on what and how to teach computation to beginning college science students, and who should be doing the teaching [SIGCE]. Our attempt takes the form of an Introductory Scientific Computing course designed to provide first and second year students with the computational tools needed throughout their undergraduate careers, and its associated text, A First Course in Scientific Computing (Princeton University Press, 2005). In recognition of the widespread disagreement over which computing tools lower division college students should learn, the paper text covers Maple and Java, while the accompanying CD contained essentially identical texts in Mathematica and Fortran90, as well as the associated notebooks, worksheets, programs, and data sets. The combination of A First Course in Scientific Computing and A Survey of Computational Physics (Princeton University Press, 2008) pave a continuous computational path throughout the undergraduate curriculum. Here are the topics covered in the first two courses: Online Courses and Digital Books In addition to publishing text books, another way of encouraging the inclusion of more computation into curricula is to make at least the basic elements of computation courses available to faculty. As part of a demonstration project for establishing a national repository of computational science courses [EPIC,CSCVI], we
15 15 have produced video based modules for our Introductory Computational Science course (Ph 464) [Video]. We already used them with good results in our teaching, while we are told that faculty and students at other schools are also finding them useful. In light of the previously documented large overlap among different computational classes, the plan is to have modules cover individual topics which then can be assembled and used in a variety of classes and in a variety of schools. (A full course would require problem sets, quizzes, assessment exercises, and possibly supplementary materials in a specific discipline.) Although we do not view the web as a good teaching medium for general education, or for students with weak self discipline or limited motivation, it is appropriate for computational science where the best way to learn it is while sitting at a computer in a trial and error mode [Cornell]. Actually, the web is essentially ideal for computational science (it was invented for particle physics analysis): projects are always in a centralized place for students and faculty to observe, codes and data are there to run or modify, and interactive visualizations can be striking with 3 D, color, sound, and animation. Figure 13. Two Screen dumps from a video module. The left one shows an animated slide with a speaker, the right one shows a physical demonstration. In Figure 13 we show two screen dumps from a module on search methods for the solutions of simultaneous nonlinear equations. On the left is a discussion of the physics and algorithms needed, and on the right is an experimental demonstration of a statics problem that is simple, yet has no analytic solution. The module is viewed on a flash enabled Web browser, and contains an office hour in which the professor gives an informal discussion of the material, a frame with animated PowerPoint slides, various Web links, and a dynamic table of contents. The next step in this project is to combine our text books, web enhancements, programs, and video modules into ebooks. The MathML equations can be ported into and manipulated by a problem solving environment such as Maple or Mathematica, or entered into search engines to find other documents with similar equations. Likewise, the figures, in Scalar Vector Graphics or Vector Markup Language, can be can be annotated to demonstrate their meaning for different types of learners, or can have their elements viewed at different levels of abstraction. Not only would this benefit disabled persons, but it would also permit any reader to use a variety of senses to understand the materials.
16 16 Summary and Conclusions The work place has demonstrated the need to provide scientists and engineers with a better computational education. But beginnings are hard. We have seen a growing number of individuals and departments throughout the world begin to teach classes and assemble curricula in the various computational sciences. Although there is no computational science accreditation body to decide the proper content for an computational education, in practice there does appear to be a consensus regarding the basic elements of a computational science curriculum. Those elements have been tabulated and examples have been given of how they can be incorporated into courses in various disciplines. We conclude that teaching the combination of a common computational toolset across the sciences, along with the common problem solving mindset, is a truly liberating and attractive aspect of computational science since it permits computational scientists to understand and participate in a wider set of problems than is normal in this age of sub specialization. In addition, we conclude that an undergraduate education in Computational X based on projects and the problem solving paradigm is more efficient and effective than a pure X education. Although students may take fewer X classes, they tend to learn the X, CS, and math better when placed in context, and thus get more out of their courses. So even if the number of X courses needs to be reduced to make room for teaching computation, this is compensated for by the increased efficiency of the pedagogy and by a more balanced view. And the motivation when students know that their education is preparing them for fruitful employment does not hurt. Acknowledgements We wish to thank the National Science Foundation (CCLI, EPIC and NPACI), the Oregon State University College of Science and OSU Research Office, and the Krell Institute (DOE) for support of the work presented here. Bibliography [AIP] Skills Used Frequently by Physics Bachelors in Selected Employment Sectors, American Institute of Physics Education and Employment Statistics Division, (1995); R. Ivie and K. Stowe, Physics Trends Flyer: What's Important?, College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics (Fall 1999). [Cornell] P. Davis, How Undergraduates Learn Computer Skills: Results of a Survey and Focus Group, T.H.E Journal, 26, 69, April, [CP 2] R. H. Landau, Resource Letter CP 2: Computational Physics, Amer. Journ. Phys. 76, (2008). [CPC] Computational Physics for Upper Level Courses, AAPT Topical Conference, Davidson College, July 2007, Amer. J. of Phys. 76, Issues 4 & 5, pp ; [CPUG] Computational Physics for UnderGraduates, www. physics.oregonstate.edu/cpug/; Landau, R. H., Computational Physics for Undergraduates, the CPUG Degree Program at Oregon State University, Computing in Sci & Engr, 6, March/April 2004;
17 17 [EPIC] Engaging People in Cyberinfrastructure, [Fink] D. L. Finkel, Teaching with Your Mouth Shut, Boynton/Cook, Heinemann, Portsmouth, [Krell] The Krell Institute, [LEAD] Learning through Evaluation, Adaptation and Dissemination Center, University of Wisconsin, homepages.cae.wisc.edu/~lead/pages/projects; for reports on minorities and women, see homepages.cae.wisc.edu/~lead/pages/internal.html. [NSB] National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators, Chapters 3 2 (1996). [SIAM] Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, [SIGCI] The ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education, [Survey] R. H. Landau, M. J. Paez, and C. C. Bordeianu, A Survey of Computational Physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008, press.princeton.edu/titles/8704.html. [Swan] C.D. Swanson, Computational Science Education Survey, Krell Institute, (Nov. 2003). [Terra] TerraGrid, open combinations of leadership class resources at nine partner sites, with links to other grids, [Video] Video Lectures in Intro Computational Science, [VUE] The Visual Understanding Environment project at Tufts, UIT Academic Technology, vue.uit.tufts.edu/. [Winch] D. Winch, Guest Editor's Introduction: Computation in Physics Courses, Computing in Sci. & Engr. 8, No. 5, (2006). [Yas] O. Yasar, Computational Science Education: Standards, Learning Outcomes and Assessment, Computational Science ICCS 2001 Int. Conf., Editors: V. N. Alexandrov, et al., 1159, Springer, Berlin (2001); O. Yasar, J. Maliekal, L. J. Little, and D. Jones, A Computational Technology Approach to Education, Computing in Science & Engineering, 8, 76 81, (2006). [Y&L] Yaser, O. and R. Landau, Elements of Computational Science Education, SIAM Review, 45, , (2003); epubs.siam.org/sam bin/dbq/article/40807.
Stephanie A. Mungle TEACHING PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT I am a self-directed, enthusiastic college mathematics educator with a strong commitment to student learning and excellence in teaching. I bring my passion
HANDBOOK FOR THE APPLIED AND COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS OPTION Department of Mathematics Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Revised June 2013 2 THE APPLIED AND COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS OPTION
The University of Connecticut School of Engineering COMPUTER SCIENCE GUIDE TO COURSE SELECTION AY 2013-2014 Revised May 23, 2013 for Computer Science (CSci) Majors in the School of Engineering Table of
Electrical and Computer Engineering Undergraduate Advising Manual Department of Engineering University of Massachusetts Boston Revised: October 5, 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Mission
Physics William D. Thacker, Ph.D., Chair Faculty: Leslie P. Benofy, Ph.D. Gregory L. Comer, Ph.D. Vijai V. Dixit, Ph.D. John C. James, Ph. D. Martin Nikolo, Ph. D. Jean Potvin, Ph.D. Ian H. Redmount, Ph.D.
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY Undergraduate Degree Programs in the Department of Physics and Astronomy Updated 8/17/2015 This document
Accelerated Bachelor of Science/Master of Science in Computer Science 1 Dual Degree Program Definitions The discussion below uses the following definitions: o BS/MS program: The complete accelerated Bachelor
The University of Connecticut School of Engineering ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GUIDE TO COURSE SELECTION AY 2008-2009 Revised July 30, 2008 for Electrical Engineering (EE) Majors in The School of Engineering
OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mechanical Engineering Program Assessment 2007-08 October 16, 2008 INTRODUCTION The Mechanical Engineering Program within the Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering and
Applied Physics / 85 APPLIED PHYSICS (Bachelor of Science) Home Department: Department Head: Physics Kathryn Svinarich, Ph.D. Room 2-323A, 810-762-7471 firstname.lastname@example.org Program Overview Physics is
Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Sirn71lation Conference ed. J. M. Charnes, D. J. Morrice, D. T. Brunner, and J. J. SnTain SIMULATION FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE MAJORS: A PRELIMINARY REPORT ABSTRACT With the support
The University of Connecticut School of Engineering ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GUIDE TO COURSE SELECTION AY 2013-2014 Revised January 31, 2014 for Electrical Engineering (EE) Majors in The School of Engineering
School of Management and Information Systems Business and Management Systems Information Science and Technology 176 Business and Management Systems Business and Management Systems Bachelor of Science Business
Undergraduate Curriculum Manual for the Bachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering University of Kansas June 2014 THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING
Int. J. Engng Ed. Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 436±440, 2000 0949-149X/91 $3.00+0.00 Printed in Great Britain. # 2000 TEMPUS Publications. Recent Curriculum Changes in Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia
Chemical Sciences Major Chemistry is often known as the central science because of the key position it occupies in modern science and engineering. Most phenomena in the biological and Earth sciences can
Mississippi State University 1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering Department Head: Professor Donna Reese Office: 300 Butler Hall The Department of Computer Science and Engineering is dedicated
Graduate School Rankings Debate: U.S. News and World Report --and beyond Every year, U.S. News and World Report publishes a ranking of different graduate programs and, every year, college and university
The University of Connecticut School of Engineering COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING GUIDE TO COURSE SELECTION AY 2013-2014 Revised May 23, 2013 for Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) Majors in the
HPCERC1999 023 28 September 1999 Update on the Status of Computational Science and Engineering in U.S. Graduate Programs Author Martha Lee Ennis The University of New Mexico High Performance Computing,
Alexander A. Balandin Associate Professor Department of University of California - Riverside May 2005 Group Advising Meeting University of California UC Riverside Where are We? Other campuses: Berkeley
Integration of Mathematical Concepts in the Computer Science, Information Technology and Management Information Science Curriculum Donald Heier, Kathryn Lemm, Mary Reed, Erik Sand Department of Computer
UC AND THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL RATINGS OF GRADUATE PROGRAMS In the Fall of 1995, the University of California was the subject of some stunning news when the National Research Council (NRC) announced
2016-2017 University of Chicago 1 Computer Science Department Website: http://cs.uchicago.edu Program of Study The computer science program prepares students for careers in computer science by offering
DEPARTMENT OF 65-30 KISSENA BOULEVARD FLUSHING, NEW YORK 11367-1597 TEL.: (718) 997-3174/FAX: (718) 997-3349 E-MAIL: Luat.Vuong@qc.cuny.edu August 1, 2015 Subject: Pre-Engineering Program Dear Prospective
DIGITAL FORENSICS SPECIALIZATION IN BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTING SCIENCE PROGRAM Proposed Program Title: Bachelor of Science in Computing Science- Specialization in Digital Forensics Specialization
Undergraduate Program Guide Bachelor of Science in Computer Science 2015-2016 DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE and ENGINEERING The University of Texas at Arlington 500 UTA Blvd. Engineering Research Building,
Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs Effective for Evaluations during the 2004-2005 Accreditation Cycle I. Objectives and Assessments The program has documented, measurable objectives, including
292 School of Science and Engineering Computer Science/Software Engineering Everald E. Mills, PhD, Chair Objectives The computer science program seeks to prepare students for careers that require sophisticated
Masters of Science Teaching Science General Science Portland State University - Center for Science Education 1.0 Program Background About the Master s of Science Teaching in General Science Degree (MST)
CIVIL ENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATE GUIDE BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING (BS CE) THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS CEAE DEPARTMENT Revised August 2015 THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL
College of Science Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Programs: Assessment Plan Computer Science and Computer Networks Computer Science offers the following instructional programs: 1. Bachelor
SUBJECT-SPECIFIC CRITERIA Relating to the accreditation of Bachelor s and Master s degree programmes in the field of mathematics (09 December 2011) The following specifications complement the ASIIN General
Page 1 of 7 Undergraduate Degree Map for Completion in Four Years College: College of Science, Engineering & Technology Department: Elec. & Computer Engineering Name of Program: COMPUTER ENGINEERING Degree
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE DEGREE GENERAL EDUCATION CURRICULUM and Additional Degree Requirements Engineering Science Brett Coulter, Ph.D. - Director The Engineering Science degree is a wonderful way for liberal
Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science Bachelor of Science in Computer Science (B.S.C.S.) Goals for the Computer Science Program The undergraduate Computer Science program is committed
Brian Alan Snyder, Ph. D. Current work address Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Work phone: (906) 635-2658 Lake Superior State Home phone: (906) 253-9822 650 West Easterday Ave. Department
Undergraduate Physics Degree Programs (2015-16) Physics is concerned with the most basic principles that underlie all phenomena in the universe. Physicists ask, How does the world work? They search for
Computer Science Dr. Ilhyun Lee Professor Dr. Ilhyun Lee is a Professor of Computer Science. He received his Ph.D. degree from Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois (1996). He was selected
The field of computing enables much of the on-going revolution in information technology and communications. Its techniques, tools and problem-solving approaches have proven most powerful and effective.
Computational Engineering Programs at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Ulrich Ruede Lehrstuhl für Simulation, Institut für Informatik Universität Erlangen http://www10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/ ruede
UNDERGRADUATE COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION: A NEW CURRICULUM PHILOSOPHY & OVERVIEW John C. Knight, Jane C. Prey, & Wm. A. Wulf Department of Computer Science University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22903
Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering Program Change Proposal BS in Computer Engineering Motivation: The motivation for the proposed changes to the BS in Computer Engineering is twofold.
COMPUTER & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT Udvar-Hazy Business Building (435) 652-7723 http://cit.cs.dixie.edu/ To find faculty & staff phone numbers and email addresses, please consult the University
Program Approval Form For approval of new programs and deletions or modifications to an existing program. Action Requested: Type (Check one): Create New (SCHEV approval required except for minors) B.A.
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY Built Environment Construction Management Robert B. Pyle, Department Chair 2013-2014 Common program outcomes and student learning outcomes for
Pan-University Bachelor of Science Degree Structure Background With the restructuring of Faculties at York University in the last few years it became evident that pan- University structures for both BA
1 Undergraduate Mathematics Programs at OSU April 2014 The Department of Mathematics at OSU offers a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics, a minor in mathematics, and a minor in actuarial science.
The Applied and Computational Mathematics Program at The Johns Hopkins University James C. Spall The Applied and Computational Mathematics Program emphasizes mathematical and computational techniques of
Sample year Degree Plan 2016-17 Catalog Note: This is just a guide; please consult with your academic advisor, the Catalog, and your degree audit for specific requirements. Physics, B.S. Liberal Arts Emphasis
Orit Hazzan's Column Abstraction in Computer Science & Software Engineering: A Pedagogical Perspective This column is coauthored with Jeff Kramer, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London ABSTRACT
Journal of Technology Education Vol. 25 No. 2, Spring 204 A Curricular Analysis of Undergraduate Technology & Engineering Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States Introduction Technology & engineering
MATHEMATICS Administered by the Department of Mathematical and Computing Sciences within the College of Arts and Sciences. Paul Feit, PhD Dr. Paul Feit is Professor of Mathematics and Coordinator for Mathematics.
UNIVERSITY PROPOSAL SAMPLES Appalachian State University: The Institution and Physics Department Appalachian state University (ASU) is a mid-sized regional state university serving approximately 15,000
Proposed Computer Science Program Change: The recent ABET accreditation review gave the Computer Science programs a deficiency in standard IV-3: The curriculum must include at least 30 semester hours of
Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science Interdisciplinary Programs Software Engineering (B.S.S.E.) Goals of the Software Engineering Program The focus of the Software Engineering degree
Bachelor o Science in Computer Science Advising Brochure 201 2015 Department o Computer Science & Engineering College o Arts & Sciences 256 Avery Hall email@example.com http://cse.unl.edu/advising The
An Accelerated Introductory Computer Science Course Sequence for Non-Traditional Master s Students J. Denbigh Starkey Ray S. Babcock Anne S. DeFrance Computer Science Department Montana State University
THE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR STUDENTS GRADUATING IN 2017 AND LATER (also see the Math Education web site: www.mathed.soe.vt.edu) 1. INTRODUCTION Mathematics - Education Option (Math-Ed Program).
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS & COMPUTING The Department of Mathematics and Computing provides students with opportunities to earn Bachelor of Science degrees in computer information systems or in mathematics.
Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Modeling Joseph Malkevitch, York College (CUNY), Chair Ricardo Cortez, Tulane University Michael A. Jones, Mathematical Reviews Michael O Neill, Claremont McKenna College
Session 2655 Training Future Professors: The Preparing Future Faculty Program in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Cincinnati Gary Lewandowski, Xavier University,
Academic Program Review SUMMARY* Department under review: Computer Science Date self-study received in Dean s office: November 21, 2013 Date of external consultant s review: November 2013 Date APR received
COURSE CATALOG Contents Introduction... 3 Delta Courses... 4 The College Classroom... 4 The College Classroom: International Students, International Faculty... 4 Diversity in the College Classroom... 4
Guide to the MSCS Program Sheet Eric Roberts and Mehran Sahami (revisions by Claire Stager) September 2012 Welcome to the Stanford Computer Science Department! This guide is designed to help you understand
MARITIME COLLEGE UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE CURRICULA For Students Entering Maritime College During 2014-2015 Academic Year As of 8/20/2014 2014-15 Degree Curricula Page 1 UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE CURRICULA Bachelor
CURRICULUM VITA Michael J. Tammaro Department of Physics University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881 (401) 874-2079 firstname.lastname@example.org EDUCATION Ph.D., August 1997, Theoretical Condensed Matter Physics,
194 / Psychology PSYCHOLOGY Taylor Hall 206, 4.625.93 Faculty McDermid - Head, Adamopoulos, Cathey, Cochran, A. Cole, C. Cole, Huffman, Kostan Mission The Psychology Department at Missouri Southern provides
Proposal for Undergraduate Certificate in Large Data Analysis To: Helena Dettmer, Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Curriculum From: Suely Oliveira (Computer Science), Kate Cowles (Statistics),
Proceedings of the 2009 Industrial Engineering Research Conference Developing a Curriculum in Service Systems Engineering Dana M. Johnson, Leonard J. Bohmann, Kris Mattila, Amlan Mukherjee, Nilufer Onder,
Technical Elective Tracks Industrial & Systems Engineering ISE Elective Tracks for Increased Depth in Select Areas In this packet we describe five elective tracks that are available as part of the curriculum
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES The Department of Physical Sciences offers the following undergraduate degree programs: BS in Chemistry BS in Chemistry/Engineering (offered as a dual degree program with
Master of Science in Systems Engineering Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Master of Science program in systems engineering is designed to prepare students for significant engineering-related
Opportunities in Biomedical Sciences Stuart E. Ravnik, Ph.D. Assistant Dean Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Stuart E. Ravnik, Ph.D. July 24, 2003 Scientific Thought Observation Experimentation Hypothesis
Mechanical Engineering Technology 2011-12 Assessment Report I. Introduction The Bachelor of Science program in Mechanical Engineering Technology is offered in three locations Klamath Falls, Portland Metro