1 Page 1 IPP Learning Outcomes Report Program: Department: Psychology MA Program, Industrial Organizational (I O) Option Psychology Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 15 (Appendix A) Faculty member completing template: Rachel August and Greg Hurtz Date: 1/25/12 Period of reference in the template: to present 1. Please describe your program s learning outcomes trajectory since : Has there been a transformation of organizational culture regarding the establishment of learning outcomes and the capacity to assess progress toward their achievement? If so, during which academic year would you say the transformation became noticeable? What lies ahead; what is the next likely step in developing a learning outcomes organizational culture within the program? [Please limit your response to 200 words or less] The Industrial Organizational Option has recently been shaped by the Psychology Department Self Study (2006), the Psychology Department Program Review (2007), and ongoing assessment initiatives (2007 present). The organizational culture consequently developed has become a more purposeful one, with greater focus on training students toward more specific program outcomes. We have begun to use more specific measurement tools, both for the I O option and department wide, to assess those outcomes. We see two immediate steps in the near future: (1) continued development of methods and instruments to assess learning outcomes, and (2) tightening the feedback loop between data collected via assessment and any needed program change. 2. Please list in prioritized order (or indicate no prioritization regarding) up to four desired learning outcomes ( takeaways concerning such elements of curriculum as perspectives, specific content knowledge, skill sets, confidence levels) for students completing the program. For each stated outcome, please provide the reason that it was designated as desired by the faculty associated with the program. [Please limit your response per outcome to 300 words or less] a) Competence in Acquiring, Reviewing, and Evaluating Information from the Psychological Literature. Competence in acquiring, reviewing, and evaluating information from the psychological literature is one of the areas identified as an I O Option student learning objective. This objective is a primary value because all professionals working in the field of I O must be able to make decisions about organization scenarios, and identify key features of those scenarios, based on solid scientific evidence found in the I O psychology literature. Without knowledge of such literature and the ability to evaluate it, I O professionals run the risk of making poor decisions for organizations. This could have negative ramifications for the organization, much less create legal problems for the I O professional.
2 Page 2 b) Competence in Generating and Articulating Research Problems and Designing Sound Research Studies. Competence in generating and articulating research problems and designing sound research studies is one of the areas identified as an I O Option student learning objective. This objective is a primary value because professionals working in the field of I O must frequently design research studies in order to create effective interventions for organizational change, evaluate training programs, and assess issues of fairness and equity in personnel matters (e.g., recruiting, selection, promotions). It is essential that we train our students, who will ultimately become I O professionals, with these skills so that the research studies they design in professional settings are valid and reliable. c) Competence in Analyzing and Interpreting the Results of Data and Drawing Inferences and Conclusions from Empirical Results. Competence in analyzing and interpreting the results of data and drawing inferences and conclusions from empirical results is one of the areas identified as an I O Option student learning objective. This objective is a primary value because organizations rely on I O psychologists to make sound recommendations for organizational change and interventions based on data collection and analyses. I O students in training must master this skill in order to provide useful information to the organizations for which they ultimately work. d) Competence in Writing Psychological Reports and Giving Professional level Oral Presentations. Competence in writing psychological reports and giving professional level oral presentations is one of the areas identified as an I O Option student learning objective. This objective is a primary value for the program because professionals in the field of I O regularly provide organizations with written feedback on research conducted in reference to organizational needs. In addition, I O professionals regularly provide oral feedback to organizational officials about the findings of research conducted in reference to organizational needs. Students require this competency to meet the needs of the profession they will ultimately enter. 3. For undergraduate programs only, in what ways are the set of desired learning outcomes described above aligned with the University s Baccalaureate Learning Goals? Please be as specific as possible. [Please limit your response to 400 words or less] N/A 4. For each desired outcome indicated in item 2 above, please: a) Describe the method(s) by which its ongoing pursuit is monitored and measured.
3 Page 3 b) Include a description of the sample of students (e.g., random sample of transfer students declaring the major; graduating seniors) from whom data were/will be collected and the frequency and schedule with which the data in question were/will be collected. c) Describe and append a sample (or samples) of the instrument (e.g., survey or test), artifact (e.g., writing sample and evaluative protocol, performance review sheet), or other device used to assess the status of the learning outcomes desired by the program. d) Explain how the program faculty analyzed and evaluated (will analyze and evaluate) the data to reach conclusions about each desired student learning outcome. [Please limit your response to 200 words or less per learning outcome] 1) Competence in Acquiring, Reviewing, and Evaluating Information from the Psychological Literature (AYs: 2007 Present, e.g., 08/07 08%20Psychology.pdf). This is an ongoing annual assessment project. a. Methods. I O graduate student thesis/projects are reviewed by committee members who rate the students on two dimensions (Literature Review, Presentation of Context for Thesis/Project). b. Sample. N=27 I O master s students with ratings from 1 3 thesis committee members (N=61 ratings). c. Instruments. Competence in Acquiring, Reviewing, and Evaluating Information from the Psychological Literature are part of an instrument that assesses nine dimensions of the program s missions and goals that are rated on a 4 point Likert scale where 1=Below Minimal Competence, 2 = Minimal Competence, 3=Satisfactory Competence, and 4=High Level of Competence (Appendix B). d. Analysis and Conclusions. Means = 3.63 and 3.60 for Literature Review and for Presentation of Context, respectively, showing that students performed well in the early stages of the research process. The program has been successful in having students achieve program learning goals in areas of knowledge, explanatory skills and research skills. 2) Competence in Generating and Articulating Research Problems and Designing Sound Research Studies (AYs: 2007 Present, e.g., 08/07 08%20Psychology.pdf). This is an ongoing annual assessment project. a. Methods. I O graduate student thesis/projects rated by committee members on Description of Research Problem/Purpose and Methodology Addressing Problem/Purpose for Thesis/Project. b. Sample. N=27 I O master s students with ratings from 1 3 thesis committee members (N=61 ratings). c. Instruments. Competence in Generating and Articulating Research Problems and Designing Sound Research Studies are part of an instrument that assesses nine
4 Page 4 dimensions rated on a 4 point Likert scale where 1=Below Minimal Competence, 4=High Level of Competence (Appendix B). d. Analysis and Conclusions. Means for two areas ranged from 3.65 (Description of Research Problem/Purpose) to 3.40 (Methodology Addressing Problem/Purpose), showing that students performed well in the middle stages of research process. The program has been successful in having students achieve program learning goals in areas of knowledge, explanatory skills and research skills. 3) Competence in Analyzing and Interpreting the Results of Data and Drawing Inferences and Conclusions from Empirical Results. a. Graduate Thesis/Project Ratings (AYs: 2007 Present, e.g., 08/07 08%20Psychology.pdf). 1. Methods. Ongoing ratings of student theses/projects by 1 3 committee members. 2. Sample. N=27 master s students with ratings from 1 3 thesis committee members (N=61 ratings). 3. Instruments. Competence in Analyzing and Interpreting the Results of Data and Drawing Inferences and Conclusions from Empirical Results are part of an instrument that assesses nine dimensions of the program s missions and goals rated on a 4 point Likert scale where 1=Below Minimal Competence, 4=High Level of Competence (Appendix B). 4. Analysis and Conclusions. Means ranged from 3.39 (Data or Conceptual Analysis) to 3.43 (Conclusion Drawn from Analysis), showing that students performed well in the later stages of the research process. b. Research Conference Poster Ratings (AY Annual Assessment project) 1. Methods. Student authored APA style research posters accepted to the 2011 Psychology annual research conference rated by faculty. 2. Sample. N=24 sets of research poster ratings by 8 FT faculty. Advanced undergraduate and graduate students often were co authors on the same poster, making it impossible to separate undergraduate and graduate work. 3. Instruments. The Psychology Inquiry and Analysis VALUE rubric was used to rate Topic Selection, Design Process, Analysis and Conclusion on a 4 point Likert scale where 1=Benchmark, 2 & 3=Milestone and 4=Capstone (Appendix C). 4. Analysis and Conclusions. Means in the 3.3 to 3.4 range corresponded to the high end of the milestone category for all dimensions of the rubric for research posters. Thus, student performance was of outstanding quality. Future assessment will include a procedure for differentiating undergraduate from graduate work when possible.
5 Page 5 4) Competence in Writing Psychological Reports and Giving Professional level Oral Presentations (AYs: 2007 Present, e.g., 08/07 08%20Psychology.pdf). This is an ongoing annual assessment project. Students will learn to write psychological reports and give professional level oral presentations at a professional level. a. Methods. Ongoing assessment of I O graduate students who are observed during their oral defense of their culminating project and their thesis/project is reviewed by their committee members who rate the students on three dimensions (Writing of Thesis/Project, Oral Presentation of Work, and Responses to Questions during the Oral Defense for Thesis/Project). b. Sample. N=27 I O master s students with ratings from 1 3 thesis committee members (N=61 ratings). a. Instruments. Competence in Writing Psychological Reports and Giving Professionallevel Oral Presentations is part of an instrument that assesses nine of the department s missions and goals that are rated on a 4 point Likert scale where 1=Below Minimal Competence and 4=High Level of Competence (Appendix B). b. Analysis and Conclusions. Means ranged from 3.58 (Writing of Thesis/Project) to 3.54 (Oral Presentation of Work) to 3.33 (Responses to Questions). Results showed that students performed well in the later stages of the research process. 5. Regarding each outcome and method discussed in items 2 and 4 above, please provide examples of how findings from the learning outcomes process have been utilized to address decisions to revise or maintain elements of the curriculum (including decisions to alter the program s desired outcomes). If such decision making has not yet occurred, please describe the plan by which it will occur. [Please limit your response to 200 words or less per item] a) Competence in Acquiring, Reviewing, and Evaluating Information from the Psychological Literature. This assessment effort is ongoing and informs the instruction of core I O courses. No clear problems have been identified in the I O Option related to competencies in this area, as means related to this outcome are relatively high (approximately 3.6 out of 4.0). To ensure this competency continues to be met, the I O faculty meet regularly as well as exchange syllabi to ensure that core I O courses continue to include current and relevant literature in our courses. b) Competence in Generating and Articulating Research Problems and Designing Sound Research Studies. This assessment effort is ongoing and informs the instruction of I O students engaged in the thesis process. No clear problems have been identified in the I O Option related to competencies in this area, as means related to this outcome are relatively high (approximately out of 4.0). The I O faculty aim to continue meeting this competency using the strategy currently in place of holding meetings with thesis students and their
6 Page 6 committee members prior to the start of data collection for the thesis. The intent of this meeting is to ensure that the proposed research design is sound and should pose no problems with regard to data collection. c) Competence in Analyzing and Interpreting the Results of Data and Drawing Inferences and Conclusions from Empirical Results. This assessment effort is ongoing and informs the instruction of core I O courses. No clear problems have been identified in the I O Option related to competencies in this area, as means related to this outcome are relatively high (approximately 3.4 out of 4.0). The I O faculty continue to use a strategy of regular feedback to thesis students related to thesis data analysis and interpretation as a way of achieving this competency. Each student meets with his or her thesis adviser to obtain feedback multiple times during the period of writing the thesis proposal, collecting data, and writing the final thesis. This strategy ensures that students develop these competencies prior to defending their theses and entering the professional world. d)competence in Writing Psychological Reports and Giving Professional level Oral Presentations. This assessment effort is ongoing and informs the instruction of core I O courses. No clear problems have been identified in the I O Option related to competencies in this area, as means related to this outcome are relatively high (approximately out of 4.0). The I O faculty continue to focus on this competency by maintaining the requirement in I O core courses to provide written psychological reports as well as provide professional level oral presentations, to ensure that all I O students practice and develop this competency while in training. 6. Has the program systematically sought data from alumni to measure the longer term effects of accomplishment of the program s learning outcomes? If so, please describe the approach to this information gathering and the ways in which the information will be applied to the program s curriculum. If such activity has not yet occurred, please describe the plan by which it will occur. [Please limit your response to 300 words or less] The I O program as of yet has not conducted an alumni survey which measures outcomes from I O alumni specifically. However, the Psychology Department conducted an alumni survey of our graduate students, and I O students were part of the sample. Though there is no unique identification of their program designation in the survey data, the following information can be taken as at least partially representative of I O alumni opinions. Our most recent Psychology alumni survey was completed in AY and was keyed to a subset of missions and goals set forth in the department s 2006 self study. As shown in Appendix D, the 23 item survey contained four quantitative parts, one qualitative part and demographic questions. A 5 point rating scale was used with higher ratings indicating higher educational quality. Of the 238 surveys sent out, 48 were returned, resulting in a 24% return
7 Page 7 rate which is generally consistent with the mailed survey methodology. Of those 48 surveys, 15 represented students who had received both a B.A. and a M.A. (n=8) or only a M.A. from our department. Survey results pertaining to the Psychology MA program, showed that most ratings averaged a scale value of 4: Training M= ; Activities/Experiences M= ; Perceived Faculty Competence/Activity M= ; and Guidance/Preparation M= Substantial changes have been made since this survey that help to maintain areas of strength and address areas needing for improvement. For example, in the Training area, our general methods courses give more exposure to different phases of the research process, e.g., conducting literature searches, analyzing data. In the area of Activities/Experience we have begun budgeting our FTES allotment to protect supervisory course offerings, such as PSYC 295F (fieldwork), PSYC 294 (Cooperative Research) and PSYC 295A (Teaching Assistantships). To support Perceived Faculty Competence/Activity we began alternating semesters of 3 class and 4 class teaching loads, thereby increasing faculty assigned time for scholarly activity. To improve Guidance/Preparation, we shifted to a mentoring model with more one on one mentoring, guidance and supervision from faculty to students, which encourages timely completion of thesis/project. We recently adopted a system where student advisors regularly complete and sign off on a graduate student progress report to provide timely, written notification of any problems and the opportunity to discuss them and to provide any guidance to remediate problems. 7. Does the program pursue learning outcomes identified by an accrediting or other professional discipline related organization as important? Does the set of outcomes pursued by your program exceed those identified as important by your accrediting or other professional discipline related organization? [Please limit your response to 300 words or less] There is no accrediting organization that establishes strict learning outcomes for certification of I O programs. Perhaps the closest thing is a set of guidelines published in 1994 (http://www.siop.org/guidelines.aspx) by the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) Division 14 of the American Psychological Association (APA). The authors were clear that these were only intended to provide guidance, and not strict standards. Further, given the extensiveness of the guidelines relative to the number of hours required for a master s degree (the guidelines closely follow a set of doctoral I O guidelines), the authors were clear that variability is expected across master s programs in their breadth and depth of coverage of each recommended area. The I O program at CSUS provides consistent coverage of Area I (Core Psychological Domains), Area II (Data Collection and Analysis Skills), and Area III (Core I O Domains) of the SIOP guidelines. The balance of breadth and depth in the core I O domains varies somewhat based on faculty emphasis and student interests, but this is in keeping with the spirit of the guidelines. Coverage of Area IV (Additional Desirable I O Domains) is usually limited because these areas are not deemed crucial by the guidelines or the current I O faculty.
8 Page 8 The SIOP guidelines blend well with our stated learning outcomes from item 2 in this report: Our coverage of general psychology and I O specific content (SIOP Areas I & III) gives students the foundation for understanding the relevant psychological literature and identifying relevant research problems; our solid coverage of research methods and statistics (SIOP Area II) provides them with the foundation for designing sound studies, analyzing data, and properly interpreting the results; our coverage of general psychology, I O content, and research methods (SIOP Areas I, II, & III) gives them the foundation for writing informative research reports and communicating research findings. 8. Finally, what additional information would you like to share with the Senate Committee on Instructional Program Priorities regarding the program s desired learning outcomes and assessment of their accomplishment? [Please limit your response to 200 words or less] The I O program has a long history in our Department. It was formalized as a concentration in 2002, but some of the founding members of our Department were I O psychologists and put the curriculum in place very early on. For many years prior to its formal designation as a concentration, there was an unofficial track of I O courses in place that was popular among students. For decades our I O training has fed the local workforce (especially in State jobs but also local consulting firms) with individuals trained in research and statistical methods plus more specific I O content and methods. We have alumni that have been working locally for 30 years or more, supervising our more recent graduates. Our students and alumni are very active in the Northern California chapter of the Personnel Testing Council. There is a nice professional community built around our long standing I O program, and our students and graduates are very employable with the knowledge and skills they gain in our program. We feel that our desired learning outcomes, which are built around the research process, are in keeping with our research oriented perspective on the I O training we provide. That so many of our students and alumni are using their I O focused research skills in their jobs supports our focus on these learning outcomes.
9 Page 9 APPENDIX A Fall 2011 Enrollment for Psychology MA I/O Concentration Program Current Enrolled Majors By Department/College - Primary Academic Plans Term: Fall 2011 College: SSIS - College of Soc Sci & Inter Std Career: PBAC - Postbaccalaureate Department(s): PSYC - Psychology Selected Plan(s): PSYCIPSYCC - Psych (Indust & Org Psyc) CC, PSYCIPSYMA - Psych (Industrial & Org Psyc) Run Date: Feb 2, 2012 Department Desc Plan Type Academic Plan Academic Plan Desc Total Students Psychology MAJ PSYCIPSYMA Psych (Industrial & Org Psyc) 12 MAJ - Total 12 PRP PSYCIPSYCC Psych (Indust & Org Psyc) CC* 3 PRP - Total 3 Psychology Total 15 Summary - Total for Selected Career(s), College/Department(s), Academic Plan(s) 15 *Conditionally classified students are admitted to the program but have required course remediation.
10 Page 10 APPENDIX B Thesis/Project Competencies Assessment Form
11 APPENDIX C Department of Psychology VALUE Rubrics INQUIRY AND ANALYSIS Psychology: I O Option Page 11 Topic selection Existing Knowledge, Research, and/or Views Design Process Analysis Capstone 4 Identifies an innovative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant yet previously lessexplored aspects of the topic. Synthesizes indepth information from relevant, valid and reliable sources representing various points of view/approaches. All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from relevant subdisciplines. Identifies and completes most appropriate analytical procedure for methodology. Organizes and interprets evidence to evaluate hypotheses and reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related Milestone 3 Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic. Presents in-depth information from relevant, valid and reliable sources representing various points of view/approaches. Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately understood and developed; however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for. Identifies and completes appropriate analytical procedure. Organizes evidence to evaluate hypotheses and reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. Milestone 2 Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is overly narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic or is overly general. Presents information from relevant, valid and reliable sources representing only limited points of view/approaches. Basic methodology or theoretical framework is understood; however, critical elements are missing, under developed, or unfocused. Identifies and completes acceptable analytical procedure. Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities. Benchmark* 1 Identifies a topic that is too narrowly focused or too general to be manageable or doable. Presents information from sources that lack validity or reliability or represents limited points of view/approaches. Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework. Has difficulty identifying and completing acceptable analytical procedure. Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
12 Page 12 to focus. Conclusions Synthesizes evidence, relates to body of literature and states a conclusion that is States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings. States an ambiguous, illogical, or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings. a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings. specifically to the inquiry findings. Limitations and Implications Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications. Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications. Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications. Presents limitations and implications, but they are possibly irrelevant and unsupported. *Evaluators are encouraged to assign a zero to any work sample or collection of work that does not meet benchmark (cell one) level performance.
13 Page 13 APPENDIX D Student Outcome Assessment Alumni Survey Spring 2007
Page 1 IPP Learning Outcomes Report Program: Department: Psychology MA (General) Psychology Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 48 (Appendix A) Faculty member completing template:
Page 1 IPP Learning Outcomes Report Program: Department: Applied Behavior Analysis Certificate Program Psychology Number of students enrolled in the program in fall, 2011: Data unavailable Students become
Program: Preliminary Speech Language Pathology Credential (Note: this document is identical to the document submitted of the Speech Pathology and Audiology M.S. program) Department: Speech Pathology and
Template Program BA, Social Science Department Social Science Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011 148 Faculty member completing template David M. Lang, Director (Date 1/19/12) Period
Program: Civil Engineering Master s and Graduate Certificate Program Department: Civil Engineering Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 84 Faculty member completing template: Ramzi
Gerontology Major Learning Outcomes Assessment 2012 1 Program: Gerontology Bachelors of Science Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: CMS data show 69 students enrolled (as of December
2014 2015 Annual Assessment Report for Psychology FOR GRADUATE AND CREDENTIAL PROGRAMS: THIS TEMPLATE REFERS TO SAC STATE BACCALAUREATE LEARNING GOALS. PLEASE IGNORE THESE REFERENCES IN YOUR REPORT. Q1.1.
Program: Department: MBA Human Resource Management CBA Table 1: Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011 (approximate numbers) MBA Concentration (Program) # students Human Resource Management
Program Minor in Information Security and Computer Forensics Department _Computer Science Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011 14 Faculty member completing template Isaac Ghansah, Director
Learning Outcomes Data for the Senate Committee on Instructional Program Priorities Program: Department: MS Nursing (with RN license) Master s of Science in Nursing (MSN) School of Nursing Number of students
Program: Speech Pathology and Audiology B.S Department: Speech Pathology and Audiology Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 220 Faculty member completing template: Laureen O Hanlon
Program Department Masters in Education: Curriculum and Instruction EDTE 19 students Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011 Faculty member completing template Frank Lilly (Date 1 19 12)
Undergraduate Degree Program Assessment Progress Report Cover Sheet Degree: B.A. For Calendar Year: 2014 (Date submitted to college committee:) 02/20/2015 (Date posted on college assessment website:) By:
Learning Outcomes Data for the Senate Committee on Instructional Program Priorities Program: Baccalaureate of Science in Nursing Registered Nurse to Baccalaureate of Science in Nursing (RN to BSN) Program
California State University, Stanislaus Business Administration (MBA) ASSESSMENT REPORT 2008 09 and PLAN 2009 2010 I. OVERVIEW The MBA Program in the College of Business Administration reaffirms its commitment
PsyD Psychology (2014 2015) Program Information Point of Contact Marianna Linz (email@example.com) Support for University and College Missions Marshall University is a multi campus public university providing
Academic Program: Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology Graduate or Undergraduate: Graduate Date: October 10, 2003 Coordinator of the Program: Kenneth W. Sewell Person completing this form: Kenneth W.
Review of the M.A., M.S. in Psychology 42.0101 Overview of the program. The M.A., M.S. in Psychology program is housed in the Department of Psychology within the College of Arts and Sciences. Other programs
Page 1 of 16 UAF-UAA Joint PhD Program in Clinical-Community Psychology with Rural, Indigenous Emphasis Outcomes Assessment Goals,, and Benchmarks Mission The PhD Program in Clinical-Community Psychology
Student Outcomes Assessment Plan (SOAP) I. Mission Statement CSM Psychology, BS The mission of the Department of Psychology is to provide quality instruction in behavioral science to the students of California
Research Guidelines for the Master of Science in Nursing Northern Michigan University College of Professional Studies Department of Nursing May 2007 Table of Contents Introduction.. 4 Project Options..
Draft Policy on Graduate Education Preface/Introduction Over the past two decades, the number and types of graduate programs have increased dramatically. In particular, the development of clinical master
ASSESSMENT 5: Masters Degree ECE Summative Assessment Project, Thesis or Paper This Assignment Addresses These Specific Program Standards Affecting the Development of Both the Early Childhood Teacher Leader
Guidelines for Massachusetts Early Educator Preparation Programs Participating in the Early Childhood Educator Scholarships Program Background The Departments of Higher Education and Early Education and
B.A. in Psychology Program Assessment Plan June 30, 2005 Program Mission Statement: The Bachelor of Arts in Psychology provides a foundation for traditional and non-traditional students who wish to become
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE Faculty of Engineering DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE MSc REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES (Revised: September 2013) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. MSC ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Application
STUDENT HANDBOOK FOR MSAH 7000 MASTER S THESIS OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SPORT SCIENCES WESTERVILLE, OHIO This document serves as the syllabus for all sections of MSAH 7000 Effective
1 Learning Outcomes Data for the Senate Committee on Instructional Program Priorities Program: Department: M.S. in Counseling: School Counseling Specialization EDC / Counselor Education Number of students
Program: Certificate, Judicial Administration Department: Public Policy and Administration Number of students enrolled in the program in fall 2011: 11 Faculty members completing template: Rob Wassmer (PPA
Background Manship School of Mass Communication Annual Report on Mass Communication Graduate Student Learning Assessment May 30, 2011 Amy Reynolds, Associate Dean, Graduate Studies & Research The Manship
Northern Illinois University Report to the University Assessment Panel Fall 2007 Program: EdD in Instructional Technology The Doctor of Education program in Instructional Technology prepares students to
THE Ph.D. PROGRAM IN MARKETING The Smeal College of Business The Pennsylvania State University 2012-2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Structure of Ph.D. Program... 3-9 Course Work... 3 Candidacy Exam...
Psychology (MA) ACADEMIC DIRECTOR: Carla Marquez-Lewis CUNY School of Professional Studies 101 West 31 st Street, 7 th Floor New York, NY 10001 Email Contact: Carla Marquez-Lewis, firstname.lastname@example.org
Program Level Assessment Report for 2012-2013 PROGRAM NAME, DEGREE NAME (e.g. Organizational Leadership, B.S.): Sociology, B.A. COLLEGE in which PROGRAM is housed: CoLA REPORT PREPARED by: Jacqueline Bergdahl
NATIONAL CATHOLIC SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SERVICE Baccalaureate Study in Social Work Goals and Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes In keeping with the social teachings and values of the Roman Catholic Church,
Council for Standards in Human Service Education National Standards MASTER S DEGREE IN HUMAN SERVICES http://www.cshse.org 2013 (2010, 2009) I. GENERALPROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS A. Institutional Requirements
Assessment Planning Guide for University of Rochester Graduate Degree Programs I. Introduction II. Useful outcomes-based program assessment: Designing an assessment plan that addresses key questions and
THE REFLECTIVE STUDENT LEARNING PORTFOLIO Department of Administration, Rehabilitation & Postsecondary Education A Requirement for the: Master of Arts Education with a Concentration in Educational Leadership
The University of Southern Mississippi Detailed Assessment Report As of: 10/01/2014 04:22 PM EST 2013-2014 Psychology PhD Mission / Purpose Psychology is the scientific study of behavior, and application
Appendix A Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards A new Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards has been approved by the CSWE Board of Directors in April 2008. Preamble Social work practice
Business Psychology Department 2014 2015 Program Guidebook PhD Business Psychology (IO and Consulting Track) MA Industrial/Organizational Psychology (Internship, Thesis, and ARP Tracks) PhD Organizational
Graduate Degree Program Assessment Plan Cover Sheet (rev. 07): UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK Plan No. 7 Degree Program: Department and College: Ed.D. - Educational Administration and Supervision
Mission The principal educational purpose of the psychology department is to provide an excellent basic education for undergraduates in the theory, methodology, and core content areas of contemporary psychology.
1 M.S. in Criminal Justice Program Assessment Plan October 2007 Mission Statement of the Division of Criminology, Criminal Justice and Social Policy: The Division of Criminology, Criminal Justice and Social
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES PLAN Undergraduate and Graduate Programs DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK Introduction Our Student Outcomes Plan begins with our department s mission which is linked to the university
SECTION A The College of Communication Graduate Program Table of Contents Section Page A.1 Mission Statement... p. A2 A.2 Mentor Program.. p. A2 A.3 Program Requirements... p. A3 A.4 Concurrent Program...
Ph.D. PROGRAM IN HIGHER EDUCATION School of Education Indiana University The Ph.D. program prepares students for careers in higher education emphasizing research and related scholarly activities. Toward
1 Learning Outcomes Data for the Senate Committee on Instructional Program Priorities Program: Department: M.S. in Counseling: CAREER SPECIALIZATION EDC / Counselor Education Number of students enrolled
CGS Agenda Item: 11 37 Effective: Fall 2011 Rationale for changes to the MA in Communication Studies and to the MA in Communication Studies with an option in Community College Pedagogy Over the last four
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEGREE Educational Leadership Doctor of Philosophy Degree Major Course Requirements EDU710 (3.0 credit hours) Ethical and Legal Issues in Education/Leadership This course is an intensive
www.unomaha.edu/graduate www.facebook.com/unograduatestudies 402-554-2341 email@example.com Master of Arts in Communication: School of Communication, College of Communication, Fine Arts & Media Vision
Ph.D. Progress Checklist Work To Be Completed Timeline Actual Complete Forms I. Work with faculty mentor On Admission Form 1 II. Establish Supervisory Committee A. Chair (1) B. Identify potential collateral
Requirements for a Graduate Degree (M.S. or Ph.D.) in Oceanography at the University of Maine Mission Statement The University of Maine's Oceanography Program creates and communicates integrated understanding
Health Care Ethics Jeffrey P. Bishop, MD, PhD. Center Director and Department Chair PhD Program in Health Care Ethics The PhD program presents an integrated, interdisciplinary curriculum in Health Care
2. Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards Preamble Social work practice promotes human well-being by strengthening opportunities, resources, and capacities of people in their environments and by
Chemistry Department Policy Assessment: Undergraduate Programs 1. MISSION STATEMENT The Chemistry Department offers academic programs which provide students with a liberal arts background and the theoretical
Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards Copyright 2001, Council on Social Work Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Sections renumbered December 2001, released April 2002, corrected May 2002, July
UCD Clinical Psychology MA Program College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology (11/08) Where LOs are Addressed in Curriculum How LOs are Assessed in Curriculum* Learning Objectives (LOs)
COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION Adopted May 31, 2005/Voted revisions in January, 2007, August, 2008, and November 2008 and adapted October, 2010 All students are required to successfully complete the Comprehensive
CGS Assessment Report: MBA Program 2013-2014 Table of Contents Assessment Process Overview... 2 Assessment Report... 4 Assessment Process... 4 Results: Direct Measures of Student learning... 5 Results:
Psychology Senior Exit Interview Spring, 20XX We value your input as to how well we are meeting the goals for the psychology major at Wells. Given your experience as a graduating senior, please look over
Doctoral Degree Programs in Special Education University of Florida College of Education School of Special Education, School Psychology, & Early Childhood Studies P.O. Box 117050 / 1403 Norman Hall Gainesville,
STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT SUBMITTED BY: C.KOPAC AND M. VENZKE DATE: JUNE 26, 2014 REVISED JANUARY 2015 TO MEET UAC RECOMMENDATIONS SEE BELOW- HEADING HIGHLIGHTED IN GREY BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE
Higher Education Dickinson Hall, Room 419 (501) 569-3267 Master of Arts and Doctor of Education The Master of Arts in Higher Education is designed for those individuals who are interested in entering or
YALE CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY: TRAINING MISSION AND PROGRAM STRUCTURE The Clinical Psychology Program at Yale University aspires to educate the next generation of leading academic and research psychologists
School of Nursing RN to BSN option Program Assessment Plan Program learning outcomes: For the purpose of program assessment, a set of eight broad program learning outcomes have been developed. The successful
Department of Health Sciences Moss School of Nursing Master of Science Degree in Nursing (MSN) MSN Program Information Packet The Master of Science in Nursing degree will provide graduates with a foundation
GRADUATE PROGRAMS IN AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS AT TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY September 2013 This handbook contains information about graduate programs in Agricultural and Applied Economics. It supplements
Department ofaccounting and Finance Accounting Program Assessment Plan 1. Departmental Mission Statement: The primary mission of the Department of Accounting and Finance is to offer baccalaureate programs
UNDERGRADUATE ASSESSMENT PLAN USF SARASOTA-MANATEE 2008-2009 Degree: BS/BA in General Business Administration (GBA) CIP Code: 52.0201 Program Mission Statement: The General Business Administration (GBA)
Finance PhD in Business Administration Policies and Procedures West Virginia University is proud to add a new chapter to the legacy of the College of Business and Economics with the addition of the Doctor
Department of Applied Psychology Prospectus Master of Arts in Educational Psychology General Educational Psychology (PED) Psychological Measurement and Evaluation (PME) 239 Greene Street, Suite 400 New
Computer Science Department s Student Outcomes Assessment Plan The original SOA plan adopted in 1990 was portfolio based. Collection of information for the portfolios was sporadic and assessment of the
Ph.D. DEGREE IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP The Ph.D. degree in Organizational Leadership provides an interdisciplinary approach to the study of topics, theories and research critical to the professional
University of Michigan Dearborn Faculty and Student Guide to Graduate Thesis Health Psychology and Clinical Health Psychology 2013 2014 2 University of Michigan Dearborn Graduate Thesis in Health Psychology
June, 2015 Agenda Items I.1.a.(1) and I.1.a.(2) REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO IMPLEMENT A DOCTORATE OF EDUCATION DEGREE IN STUDENT AFFAIRS ADMINISTRATION AND LEADERSHIP AT UW-LA CROSSE PREAPARED BY UW-LA
1 Assessment of Student Learning Mental Health Program Indiana University- Purdue University Columbus 2013-2014 Progress Report Submitted by Cheryl Warner, PhD Director, Mental Health Program The IUPUC
Graduate Regulations-Spring 2014 1 GRADUATE DEGREE REGULATIONS DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GRADUATE DEGREE REGULATIONS 1 I. GENERAL INFORMATION 2 A. Graduate Advisor/Supervisory Committee.
Student Union B, Room 100 (501) 569-3160 Professional and Master of Arts in Professional and Technical Writing Technical Writing The Master of Arts in Professional and Technical Writing (PTW) program provides
Student Outcomes Assessment Plan (SOAP) I. Mission Statement Department of Political Science College of Social Science Undergraduate Bachelor s Degree in Political Science The Department of Political Science
Summary of Program Assessment Activities Each degree-granting academic program has been actively engaged in the assessment of their program learning outcomes over the last year. This engagement began as
Academic Program Assessment Plan Certificate: Homeland Security Studies Department of History and Political Science College of Humanities and Social Sciences Colorado State University-Pueblo Plan appended
NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY College: College of Business Department: Inter-Departmental Program: Master of Business Administration CIP Code: 52.0201 Northern Illinois University s M.B.A. program follows
Western Carolina University Program Assessment Plan Program: School Psychology College of Education and Allied Professions Assessment Plan for 2006-2007 Primary Contact: Candace H. Boan, Ph.D. Associate
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.