Thursday, March 18, :36 PM Page 1 of 16
|
|
- Helen Hart
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Inmation And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 9/4/ Agency: Department of Justice 3. Bureau: Office Of Justice Programs 4. Name of this Investment: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh 5. Unique Project (Investment) Identifier: (For IT investment only, see section For all other, use agency ID system.) 6. What kind of investment will this be in FY 2011? (Please Operations Maintenance NOTE: Investments moving to O&M in FY 2011, with Planning/Acquisition activities prior to FY 2011 should not select O&M. These investments should indicate their current status.) 7. What was the first budget year this investment was FY2001 or earlier to OMB? 8. Provide a brief summary justification this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency permance gap; this description may include links to relevant inmation which should include relevant GAO reports, links to relevant findings of in audits. is a web-based, data-driven application that provides end-to-end the application, approval management of. currently s the core missions processes of DOJ's Office of Justice Programs (OJP) Office on Violence Against Women (OVW). capabilities include the interface with the portal's Find Apply capabilities. is used as a system of record data source USDOJ input to USASPENDING.GOV in compliance with OMB guidance regarding FFATA. In the FY09 Exhibit 300, was classified as a Mixed Lifecycle project (DME O&M). During FY 08, was effectively changed to an O&M Lifecycle project based on two aspects of guidance from OMB in FY08. Guidance #1 - In the FY08 budget passback, OMB did not approve the allocation of DME funding to. Guidance #2 - In FY2008 OMB rejected USDOJ/OJP's waiver request to retain as a stalone Grants Management System directed USDOJ/OJP to develop a migration plan to move to a GMLOB Consortia Provider product. On 06/24/08 OMB accepted the milestone plan containing USDOJ/OJP's migration timeline Adaptive Maintenance plan FY15. For FY06, FY07, FY08 received 34,808 grant from which 10,634 were made totaling $5.3 Billion. currently s 15,013 active totaling $19.2 Billion. The FY10 O&M request $ million will OJP efts to maintain with sufficient capacity, reliability permance to meet the administration needs of USDOJ. has been approved by the OMB E-Gov Portfolio Manager pending migration to a GMLOB Consortia Provider. To fully realize the existing capabilities of from one GMLOB Providers will require modernization enhancement GMLOB products. The OMB approved milestone plan anticipates migration in FY15 when has reached the end of application system life the GMLOB has sufficiently enhanced their products to meet the needs of USDOJ's administration mission. A limited refresh of will improve system reliability, provide services users to meet changing legislative regulatory requirements, will simplify system maintenance operations. OJP will add SOA, XML, UML into. This investment will be coordinated with OJP's EA/Operational Improvements initiative the conversion to the DOJ UFMS financial system. a. Provide here the date of any approved rebaselining within the past year, the date the most recent (or planned) alternatives analysis this investment, whether this investment has a risk management plan risk register. 9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve Yes this request? a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval? 6/24/ Contact inmation of Program/Project Manager? Name Phone Number 11. What project management qualifications does the Project Page 1 of 16
2 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Manager have? (per FAC-P/PM)? 12. If this investment is a financial management system, then please fill out the following as reported in the most recent financial systems inventory (FMSI): Financial management system name(s) System Acronym Unique Project Identifier (UPI) number 120 Community Partnership Grants Management System a) If this investment is a financial management system Not a core financial system; does not need to comply with AND the investment is part core financial system then FFMIA select the primary FFMIA compliance area that this investment addresses (choose only one): Section B: Summary of Funding (Budget Authority Capital Assets) 1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, are rounded to three decimal places. personnel costs should be included only in the row designated "Government FTE Cost," should be excluded from the amounts shown "Planning," "Full Acquisition," "Operation/Maintenance." The "TOTAL" estimated annual cost investment is the sum of costs "Planning," "Full Acquisition," "Operation/Maintenance." For buildings facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, /or restoration costs. Funding all costs associated with the entire life-cycle investment should be included in this report. Funding levels should be shown budget authority by year consistent with funding levels in Exhibit 53. The Summary of Funding table shall include the amounts allocated to the investment from, should be directly tied to, the Fiscal Year Budget. This includes direct appropriations ( or matory accounts), user fees, approved self-funding activities will provide the actual annual "budget" the investment. This "budget" will be a subset congressionally approved budget each fiscal year. This will provide Departments/Agencies OMB useful inmation on the actual Fiscal Year dollars being asked spent on an investment. SUMMARY OF FUNDING FOR PROJECT PHASES (REPORTED IN MILLIONS) (Estimates BY+1 beyond are planning purposes only do not represent budget decisions) PY-1 BY+4 PY 2009 CY 2010 BY 2011 BY BY BY Total earlier beyond Planning: Acquisition: Subtotal Planning & Acquisition: Operations & Maintenance: Disposition Costs (optional): SUBTOTAL: Government FTE Costs FTE represented by Costs: TOTAL (incl. FTE costs) Government FTE Costs should not be included in the amounts provided above. Note: For the multi-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner partner agencies). Government FTE Costs should not be included as part TOTAL represented. Note 2: The two sub-total rows total row will be calculated not data entry. 2. If the summary of funding has changed from the FY2010 President's Budget request, briefly explain those changes: This summary of spending reflects the ending of this version of in FY2012. The spending reflects what is needed to maintain the system until then a renovated version of will be put in place (See Exhibit 300 Software Renovation). The spending profile has been modified from the President's FY10 budget to reflect the following investments that are reaction to business need changes prior to the implementation renovation program: Additional features resulting from system impact by the Recovery Reinvestment Act of 2009, migration of financial tracking basis to the use of DUNs numbers from agency-specific vendor numbers, additional features to exp a decision management module, expansion of GIS technology enhanced tracking of grantee permance measures collections analysis. Section C: Acquisition/Contract Strategy (All Capital Assets) 1. Complete the table all (including all non-) contracts /or task orders currently in place or planned this investment. Total Value should include all option years each contract. Contracts /or task orders completed do not need Page 2 of 16
3 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) to be included. Page 3 of 16
4 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Contract/Task Orders Table * Costs in millions What, if any, Type of If so what is alternative Contract/Task the date Is this an Contract or Has the Start date of End date of Total Value of Is it Competitively financing Is EVM in the Order (In award? If not, Interagency Task Order contract been Contract/ Task Contract/ Task Contract/ Task permance a? option is being contract? accordance what is the Acquisition? Number a (Y/N) Order Order Order ($M) based? (Y/N) (Y/N) used? (ESPC, (Y/N) with FAR Part planned award (Y/N) UESC, EUL, 16) date? N/A) Contract: Labor Hour Yes 9/8/2006 9/8/2006 9/25/ No Yes Yes NA Yes GS06F0291Z; Task Order: DJ2006TO097 Contract: DJJ05C1118 Time Materials Yes 5/9/2005 5/9/2005 5/8/ No Yes Yes NA Yes Contract: Labor Hour Yes 7/21/2008 7/21/2008 7/20/ No Yes Yes NA Yes GS35F0042N; Task Order: DJO2008F08102 Page 4 of 16
5 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) 2. If earned value is not required or will not be a contract requirement any contracts or task orders above, explain why: In July 2007, after reviewing 20 artifacts meeting with OJP staff contractors, JMD OCIO certified that is fully ANSI/EIA STD -748 compliant. In Jun 2008 JMD permed an annual compliance review determine remains ANSI compliant. 3. Is there an acquisition plan which reflects the requirements of Yes FAR Subpart 7.1 has been approved in accordance with agency requirements? a. If "yes," what is the date? 2/18/2004 NOTE: Data structure to be used to identify contract numbers in FPDS. To assist in the linkage of Contract/Task Order Numbers from the Acquisition Strategy table to FPDS, agencies should provide the following inmation "Contract/Task Order Numbers" based on the FPDS-NG data requirements (as specified in the FPDS-NG Data Element Dictionary- Part of Indefinite Delivery Vehicle (IDV)? Procurement Instrument Identifier Example Yes Data Element 1A (NTE 50 characters) " DNBCHC020042" No Data Element 1A, the Referenced PIID, Data Element 1C (NTE 100 characters) "GS09Q08DN0165-IDV-GS10F0216N" Section D: Permance Inmation (All Capital Assets) In order to successfully address this area exhibit 300, permance goals must be provided the agency be linked to the annual permance plan the relevant Agency Segment Architecture. The investment must discuss its permance measures in agency s mission strategic goals as outlined in the corresponding Segment Architecture. Permance measures (indicators) must be provided. They are the internal external permance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure. Agencies must use the following table to report permance goals measures the major investment use the Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Permance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding "Measurement Area" "Measurement Grouping" identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator each four different Measurement Areas ( each fiscal year). The PRM is available at The table can be extended to include permance measures years beyond the next President's Budget. Permance Inmation Table Fiscal Year Goal(s) Prevent Prevent Customer Prevent Measureme Measureme Measureme Measureme Baseline Target Rating OMB nt Area nt Category nt Grouping nt Indicator Results Customer Access Web posting Post all FY 173 Results Accessibility of all 2004 solicitations solicitations/ solicitations notices solicitations in the Web in posted in required customer FY 2004 beginning in on customer FY 2003 the Web Web Mission Business Results Efficiency ment Protection on ) Thursday, March 18, Page 5 of 16 Web/electron All FY 2004 ic submission of all required beginning in FY 2003 number of on multiple 4:36 PM 14,430 in FY 2004 Process/awar 4,684 FY d all FY a to Tribal governments
6 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Permance Inmation Table Fiscal Year Goal(s) Measureme nt Area Prevent Mission Results Measureme Measureme Measureme Baseline Target nt Category nt Grouping nt Indicator Results ment Protection Prevent Processes Activities Prevent Technology Reliability Prevent Customer Results Prevent Customer Results Prevent Mission Results Total dollar amount of amount of ) Complaints Extent to which established Help FY 2004 Desk can be Access Accessibility Efficiency ment Protection of established solicitations/ notices posted in customer Web on ) Web posting of all solicitations required beginning in FY 2003 Page 6 of 16 Process/awar d all FY 2004 established FY 2004 established Post all FY 2005 solicitations in customer on the Web Web/electron All FY 2005 ic submission of all required beginning in FY 2003 number of on multiple orgs. ) $6,305,229, 000 in FY 2004 a to Tribal governments orgs. ) 96.2 percent of resolved by initial Tier 1 action 543 per month (average) 225 solicitations the Web in FY ,066 in FY 2005 Process/awar 6063 FY d all FY a to Tribal governments orgs. ) Rating OMB Prevent Mission Total dollar Process/awar $6,136,983,
7 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Permance Inmation Table Fiscal Year Goal(s) Measureme nt Area Results Measureme Measureme Measureme Baseline Target nt Category nt Grouping nt Indicator Results ment Protection Prevent Processes Activities Prevent Technology Reliability Prevent Customer Prevent Customer Prevent Mission Results Prevent Mission Business Results amount of amount of ) Complaints Extent to which Help Desk can be Access Accessibility Frequency Depth ment Protection ment Protection of customer on ) Ability of Tier 1 to close upon multiple unpredictabl e 543 per month in 2004 (average) established posting Baseline electronic submission of connector not established number of on multiple Total dollar amount of amount of Page 7 of 16 d all FY 2005 Resolve all at Tier 1 -- refer to Tier 2 only when complexity or other necessitate Maintain staffing/profi ciency levels of timely effective response Post 75% of 96 FY 2006 customer 75% of FY in FY 2005 a to Tribal governments orgs. ) 99 percent of Help Desk resolved by initial Tier 1 actions 1149 per month (average) in FY 2006 (100%) received 5,765 electronic the connector in FY 2006 (100%) Process/awar 4569 FY d all FY 2006 Process/awar d all FY a to Tribal governments orgs. ) $4,478,904, 558 in FY 2006 a to Tribal governments Rating OMB
8 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Permance Inmation Table Fiscal Year Goal(s) Measureme nt Area Prevent Processes Activities Prevent Technology Reliability Prevent Customer Prevent Customer Prevent Mission Results Prevent Mission Results Measureme Measureme Measureme Baseline Target nt Category nt Grouping nt Indicator Results ) Complaints Extent to which Help Desk can be Access Accessibility Frequency Depth ment Protection ment Protection of customer on ) Ability of Tier 1 to close upon multiple unpredictabl e Page 8 of 16 Resolve all at Tier 1 -- refer to Tier 2 only when complexity or other necessitate 1149 Maintain per month in 2005 (average) Posting of all required beginning in FY 2005 Electronic submission of all required beginning in FY 2005 number of on multiple Total dollar amount of amount of ) staffing/profi ciency levels of timely effective response Maintain % posting of customer All FY 2007 orgs. ) 92.4 percent of resolved by initial Tier 1 actions 1427 per month (average) June 2007 (100%) received 8,331 electronic the connector Sep 2007 Process/awar 1,145 FY d all FY 2007 Process/awar d all FY a to Tribal governments orgs. June 2007 ) $1,048,940, 731 in FY 2007 a to Tribal government orgs June 2007 Rating OMB
9 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Permance Inmation Table Fiscal Year Goal(s) Measureme nt Area Prevent Processes Activities Prevent Technology Reliability Prevent Customer Prevent Customer Prevent Mission Results Prevent Mission Results Measureme Measureme Measureme Baseline Target nt Category nt Grouping nt Indicator Results Complaints Extent to which Help Desk can be. Access Accessibility Frequency Depth ment Protection ment Protection of customer on ) Ability of Tier 1 to close upon multiple unpredictabl e factoers. Page 9 of 16 Resolve all at Tier 1 -- refer to Tier 2 only when complexity or other necessitate Maintain per month in 2006 (average) Posting of all required beginning in FY 2005 Electronic submission of all number of on multiple Total dollar amount of amount of ) staffing/profi ciency levels of timely effective response Maintain 100% posting of customer All FY 2008 ) percent of resolved by initial Tier 1 actions 1882 per month June 2007 (average) In February 2009 DOJ was granted a waiver on the use of as a cooperative eft by agencies to reduce the impact on sys load to resulting from the ARRA Act of This metric is not applicable in FY2009. received 11,379 electronic the connector. Process/awar 4,875 FY d all FY 2008 Process/awar d all FY a to Tribal governments organizations. $5,435,498, 734 in a to Tribal government Rating OMB
10 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Permance Inmation Table Fiscal Year Goal(s) Measureme nt Area Prevent Processes Activities Prevent Technology Reliability Prevent Customer Prevent Customer Prevent Mission Results Measureme Measureme Measureme Baseline Target nt Category nt Grouping nt Indicator Results Complaints Extent to which Help Desk can be Access Accessibility Frequency Depth ment Protection Ability of Tier 1 to close upon multiple unpredictabl e Not yet of available customer. on Posting of all required beginning in FY 2005 Electronic submission of all Total dollar amount of amount of ) Page 10 of 16 Resolve all at Tier 1 -- refer to Tier 2 only when complexity or other necessitate organizations. Processed 24,203 Help Desk resolved by initial Tier 1 actions Maintain Processed staffing/profi 24,203 Help ciency levels Desk of timely effective response Maintain 100% posting of grant sysnopses on customer. All FY 2009 In February 2009 DOJ was granted a waiver on the use of as a cooperative eft by agencies to reduce the impact on sys load to resulting from the ARRA Act of This metric is not applicable in FY2009. In February 2009 DOJ was granted a waiver on the use of as a cooperative eft by agencies to reduce the impact on sys load to resulting from the ARRA Act of This metric is not applicable in FY2009. Process/awar d all FY 2009 processed in FY processed in FY2009. Rating OMB
11 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Permance Inmation Table Fiscal Year Goal(s) Measureme nt Area Prevent Mission Results Measureme Measureme Measureme Baseline Target nt Category nt Grouping nt Indicator Results ment Protection Prevent Processes Activities Prevent Technology Reliability Prevent Customer Prevent Customer Prevent Mission Results Prevent Mission Results numberards ) Complaints Extent to which Help Desk can be Access Accessibility Frequency Depth ment Protection ment Protection Ability of Tier 1 to close upon multiple unpredictabl e Not yet of available customer on Posting of all required beginning in FY 2005 Electronic submission of all Total dollar amount of amount of ) numberards ) Page 11 of 16 Process/awar d all FY Resolve all at Tier 1 -- refer to Tier 2 only when complexity or other necessitate Total grant funding a in FY2009 is $9,206,373, 869 The Helpdesk processed 46,416 in FY % were successfully closed on the first call. Maintain The staffing/profi Helpdesk ciency levels processed of 46,416 in FY % were timely successfully effective closed on the response first call. Maintain TBD 100% posting of customer All FY 2010 TBD Process/awar TBD d all FY 2010 Process/awar TBD d all FY Rating OMB
12 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Permance Inmation Table Fiscal Year Goal(s) Measureme nt Area Prevent Processes Productivity Efficiency Activities Prevent Technology Reliability Prevent Customer Prevent Customer Prevent Mission Results Prevent Mission Results Measureme Measureme Measureme Baseline Target nt Category nt Grouping nt Indicator Results Access Accessibility Frequency Depth ment Protection ment Protection Prevent Processes Productivity Efficiency Activities Extent to which Help Desk can be Ability of Tier 1 to close upon multiple unpredictabl e Not yet of available customer on Posting of all required beginning in FY 2005 Electronic submission of all Total dollar amount of amount of ) numberards ) Extent to which Help Desk can be Ability of Tier 1 to close upon multiple unpredictabl e Page 12 of 16 Resolve all at Tier 1 -- refer to Tier 2 only when complexity or other necessitate TBD Maintain TBD staffing/profi ciency levels of timely effective response Maintain TBD 100% posting of customer All FY 2011 TBD Process/awar TBD d all FY 2011 Process/awar TBD d all FY Resolve all at Tier 1 -- refer to Tier 2 only when complexity or other necessitate TBD Rating OMB
13 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Permance Inmation Table Fiscal Year Goal(s) Measureme nt Area Prevent Technology Reliability Prevent Customer Prevent Customer Prevent Mission Results Prevent Mission Results Measureme Measureme Measureme Baseline Target nt Category nt Grouping nt Indicator Results Access Accessibility Frequency Depth ment Protection ment Protection Prevent Processes Productivity Efficiency Activities Prevent Technology Reliability Not yet of available customer on Posting of all required beginning in FY 2005 Electronic submission of all Total dollar amount of amount of ) numberards ) Extent to which Help Desk can be Ability of Tier 1 to close upon multiple unpredictabl e Not yet of available Page 13 of 16 Maintain TBD staffing/profi ciency levels of timely effective response Maintain TBD 100% posting of customer All FY 2012 TBD Process/awar TBD d all FY 2012 Process/awar TBD d all FY Resolve all at Tier 1 -- refer to Tier 2 only when complexity or other necessitate TBD Maintain TBD staffing/profi ciency levels of timely effective response Rating OMB
14 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Section E: Security (IT Capital Assets only) For IT investments, agencies should maintain up-to-date tracking of which systems in the FISMA inventory any IT investment. Linking major IT investments to FISMA systems will be addressed outside the context A-11 budget submission Exhibit 300. Section F: Enterprise Architecture (EA) (IT Capital Assets only) In order to successfully address this area capital asset plan business case, the investment must be included in the agency's EA Capital Planning Investment Control (CPIC) process mapped to ing the FEA. The business case must demonstrate the relationship between the investment the business, permance, data, services, application, technology layers agency's EA. Have the requisite investment-level architecture documentation Yes requirements (e.g., reference model mappings, FTF mappings, etc.) this investment been documented in the corresponding Segment Architecture? For detailed guidance regarding segment architecture requirements, please refer to See this guidance also regarding the reporting of six digit codes corresponding to agency segment architectures in Exhibit 53,, limited cases determined by the Chief Architect, reporting an investment alignment with multiple segments. Page 14 of 16
15 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) Exhibit 300: Part III: For "Operation Maintenance" investments ONLY (Steady State) Part III should be completed only investments identified as "Operation Maintenance" (Steady State) in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above. Section A: Cost Schedule Permance (All Capital Assets) For investments classified as Operations Maintenance investments, complete the following table on milestones used to measure cost schedule permance, representing only one level investment s Work Breakdown Structure. This should generally show Level 3 Work Breakdown Structure. Page 15 of 16
16 Exhibit 300: OJP Community Partnership Grants Management System () Architecture Technology Refresh (Revision 11) 2. Comparison of Work Completed Costs to Current Approved Baseline: Complete the following table to compare actual permance against the current permance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline actual completion dates (e.g., "03/23/2003"/ "04/28/2004"), baseline actual start dates, the baseline actual total costs (in $ Millions). Note that the 'Description of Milestone' 'Percent Completed'-both Planned -fields are required. Total Cost Baseline (mm/dd/yyyy) Percentages Complete Description of Milestone Planned Cost Start Date Completion Date Planned Cost ($M) ($M) Planned Planned Stard Budget Form 4/1/2008 9/4/2008 1/1/2009 0% 95% O&M FY2001- FY /1/ /1/2000 9/30/ % 95% Peer Review II 4/1/2007 5/1/ /31/2007 0% 70% Project Totals 10/1/ /1/2000 9/30/2011 0% 92.75% Page 16 of 16
Thursday, March 18, 2010-4:15 PM Page 1 of 9
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 2. Agency: Department
More informationThursday, March 18, 2010-4:09 PM Page 1 of 8
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 12/2/2009 2.
More informationThursday, March 18, 2010-4:31 PM Page 1 of 10
Exhibit 300: JMD Law ment Wireless Communication (LEWC) (Revision 13) Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section
More informationThursday, March 18, 2010-4:04 PM Page 1 of 11
Exhibit 300: BOP Inmate Telephone (TRUFONE) (Revision 14) Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital
More informationCAPITAL ASSET PLAN AND BUSINESS CASE SUMMARY EXHIBIT 300
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview ( All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: January 26,
More informationExhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets)
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: February 9,
More informationPART ONE OVERVIEW. ESMD - Integrated Collaborative Environment
Exhibit 300 (BY2010) PART ONE OVERVIEW 1. Date of Submission: 2008-09-08 2. Agency: 026 3. Bureau: 00 4. Name of this Capital Asset: 5. Unique Project Identifier: ESMD - Integrated Collaborative Environment
More informationExhibit 300: JMD Law Enforcement Wireless Communication (LEWC) (Revision 9)
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 4/3/2009 2.
More informationExhibit 300: Exhibit 300 - Electronic Medical Record (EMR) (Revision 11) 4. Name of this Capital Asset: Exhibit 300 - Electronic Medical Record (EMR)
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 4/10/2009 2. Agency:
More informationExhibit 300: BOP Inmate Telephone System (TRUFONE) (Revision 10) 4. Name of this Capital Asset: BOP Inmate Telephone System (TRUFONE)
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 8/17/2007 2.
More informationTuesday, September 11, 2007-12:17 AM Page 1 of 8
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 9/10/2007 2. Agency:
More informationMS Word Exhibit 300 for O&M (BY2008) (Form) / JSC Space Shuttle Program Flight Software (Item)
MS Word Exhibit 300 for O&M (BY2008) (Form) / JSC Space Shuttle Program Flight Software (Item) Form Report, printed by: System Administrator, Jan 31, 2007 OVERVIEW General Information 1. Date of Submission:
More informationProSight Portfolios Report
Page 1 of 18 VR&E Maintenance and Operations (non-bdn) - 2008 PART I - A PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION In Part I, complete Sections A. B, C, and D for all capital assets (IT and non-it).
More informationCapital Programming and Project Management Under the US Budget
CIRCULAR NO. A 11 PART 7 PLANNING, BUDGETING, ACQUISITION, AND MANAGEMENT OF CAPITAL ASSETS Executive Office of the President Office of Management and Budget June 2008 SECTION 300 PLANNING, BUDGETING,
More information9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?
Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Exhibit 300: Part I: Summary and Justification (All Capital s) I.A. Overview 1. Date of Submission: 2. Agency: Department of State 3. Bureau: M/MED Medical Director 4. Name
More informationTuesday, May 12, 2009-12:05 PM Page 1 of 11
Exhibit 300: NIST-wide Grant System (Revision 21) Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan Business Case Summary Part I: Summary And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1.
More information014-00-01-01-01-1146-00. Mixed Life Cycle FY2002
Consolidated American System (CAPPS) and Interagency e Migration Exhibit 300: Part I: Summary Information and Justification (All Capital Assets) I.A. Overview 1. Date of Submission: 2. Agency: Department
More informationWednesday, April 15, 2009-8:22 AM Page 1 of 5
I.A.: OVERVIEW BY10 Descriptive Information BY10 Template Name BY2010 Investment Name ETA - UI Database Management System (formerly UI ADP Support) Investment Revision Number 12 Is this investment a consolidated
More informationExhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION (All Capital Assets)
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 09/08/2007 2.
More informationWednesday, April 15, 2009-8:48 AM Page 1 of 5
I.A.: OVERVIEW BY10 Descriptive Information BY10 Template Name BY2010 Investment Name ESA - OFCCP - Federal Contractor Compliance System Investment Revision Number 2 Is this investment a consolidated business
More informationTuesday, September 11, 2007-12:16 AM Page 1 of 6
Exhibit 300: Exhibit 300 - Electronic Medical Record (EMR) (Revision 7) Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview
More informationExhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION (All Capital Assets)
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 09/08/2006 2.
More informationPART ONE OVERVIEW. JSC Space Shuttle Program Integration
Exhibit 300 (BY2010) PART ONE OVERVIEW 1. Date of Submission: 2008-09-08 2. Agency: 026 3. Bureau: 00 4. Name of this Capital Asset: 5. Unique Project Identifier: JSC Space Shuttle Program 026-00-01-05-01-1419-00
More informationProSight Portfolios Report
Page 1 of 19 Patient Financial Services System (PFSS) - 2008 PART I - A PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION In Part I, complete Sections A. B, C, and D for all capital assets (IT and non-it).
More informationExhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION (All Capital Assets)
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 09/08/2006 2.
More informationExhibit 300: JMD Litigation Case Management System (LCMS) (Revision 3) 4. Name of this Capital Asset: JMD Litigation Case Management System (LCMS)
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 8/31/2007 2.
More informationExhibit 300: Capital Asset Summary
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview & Summary Information Date Investment First Submitted: 2012-09-12 Date of Last
More informationWednesday, May 13, 2009-3:56 PM Page 1 of 19
Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets) 1. Date of Submission: 2. : Department
More informationBusiness Case Study - The Financial Information System (OIS)
I.A.: OVERVIEW BY09 Descriptive Information BY09 Template Name BY2010 Investment Name OSHA - Information System (OIS) Investment Revision Number 19 Is this investment a consolidated business case? No Point
More informationHow To Understand The System Of The Sec.Gov
Core Financial Systems (CFS) Budget year: FY2009 Agency: 449 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Part I: Summary Information and Justification Section A: Overview
More informationSaturday, April 11, 2009-3:29 PM Page 1 of 13
Exhibit 300: Exhibit 300 - Integrated Personnel System (IPMS) (Revision 12) Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets)
More informationMixed Life Cycle FY2003
FBI Computer Analysis Response Team Storage Area Network (CARTSAN) Exhibit 300: Part I: Summary Information and Justification (All Capital Assets) I.A. Overview 1. Date of Submission: 12/19/2006 2. Agency:
More informationPrimavera Portfolio Management
Exhibit 300 BY13 (Form) / FEMA - Mapping, Assessment and Planning (RISKMAP) Program (Item) / Feb 29, 2012 (Data as of) Primavera Portfolio Management 300A - OVERVIEW Section A: Overview 1. Name of this
More informationPART ONE OVERVIEW. JSC Space Shuttle Program Flight Software
Exhibit 300 (BY2009) PART ONE OVERVIEW 1. Date of Submission: 2007-09-07 2. Agency: 026 3. Bureau: 00 4. of this Capital Asset: 5. Unique Project Identifier: JSC Space Shuttle Program Flight Software 026-00-01-03-01-1418-00
More information5 FAM 670 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT
5 FAM 670 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT (CT:IM-92; 08-01-2007) (Office of Origin: IRM/BPC/PRG) 5 FAM 671 WHAT ARE IT PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND WHY ARE THEY REQUIRED?
More informationIT DASHBOARD FAQ. Background. CIO Evaluations. Contracts. Cost, Schedule, Performance. Submitting Data to the IT Dashboard.
IT DASHBOARD FAQ Background 1. What is the IT Dashboard? 2. Why did we launch the IT dashboard? 3. Who is the intended audience for the IT Dashboard? 4. What information does the IT Dashboard display?
More informationWhat Does the Government Want from Project Management? DC PMI Chapter Executive Breakfast Series January 16, 2008
What Does the Government Want from Project Management? DC PMI Chapter Executive Breakfast Series January 16, 2008 The Government Wants from Project Management A project management process and culture in
More informationU.S. Department of the Treasury. Treasury IT Performance Measures Guide
U.S. Department of the Treasury Treasury IT Performance Measures Guide Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) Enterprise Architecture Program June 2007 Revision History June 13, 2007 (Version 1.1)
More informationIdentification And Review Of The Department s Major Information Technology Systems Inventory
Identification And Review Of The Department s Major Information Technology Systems Inventory U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Audit Division Audit Report 07-37 June 2007 IDENTIFICATION
More informationPBGC - Risk Management Early Warning / Legal Matter
OMB Exhibit 3 Budget Year 29 PBGC - Risk Early Warning / Legal Matter PBGC - Risk Early Warning / Legal Matter [redacted] Agency: 12 Exhibit 3: Capital Asset Plan Case Summary Part I: Summary Information
More informationExhibit 300: JMD Unified Financial Management System (UFMS) (Revision 9)
Exhibit 300: Unified System (UFMS) (Revision 9) Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification (All Capital Assets) Section A: Overview (All Capital
More informationConcept of Operations for Line of Business Initiatives
Concept of Operations for Line of Business Initiatives Version 1.0 Office of E-Gov and IT, OMB March 2006 Table of Contents FOREWORD...2 1 OBJECTIVES OF THE LINES OF BUSINESS CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS...3
More informationGuide to IT Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC)
U.S. Department of Energy Guide to IT Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC) September 2010 Office of the Chief Information Officer TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Preface... 1 2.0 Introduction... 2 2.1
More informationExhibit 300 (BY2010) PART ONE OVERVIEW. 1. Date of Submission: 2008-09-08. 2. Agency: 026. 3. Bureau: 00. 4. Name of this Capital Asset:
Exhibit 300 (BY2010) PART ONE OVERVIEW 1. Date of Submission: 2008-09-08 2. Agency: 026 3. Bureau: 00 4. Name of this Capital Asset: 5. Unique Project Identifier: KSC Shuttle Processing 026-00-01-05-01-1425-00
More informationThe OMB Federal IT Dashboard: Overview and Potential Application for IT Cost and Schedule Analysis
The OMB Federal IT Dashboard: Overview and Potential Application for IT Cost and Schedule Analysis Daniel Harper For Internal MITRE Use Did you know. 2 that there is a public available database of over
More informationMinerals Management Service Interim Policy Document
Minerals Management Service Interim Policy Document Effective Date: August 3, 2005 IPD No. 05-06 Series: Administrative Title: Information Technology Project Management Originating Office: Information
More informationCMS Policy for Information Technology (IT) Investment Management & Governance
Chief Information Officer Office of Information Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CMS Policy for Information Technology (IT) Investment Management & Governance May 17, 2007 Document Number:
More informationDIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL TN: DT-07-08 To: Subject: Purpose: Office and Division of Origin: NRC Management Directives Custodians Transmittal of Management Directive 2.8,
More informationIT Baseline Management Policy. Table of Contents
Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Purpose... 2 1.2 Scope and Applicability... 2 1.3 Compliance, Enforcement, and Exceptions... 3 1.4 Authority... 3 2. ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND GOVERNANCE...
More informationIntroduction. Introduction. Financial Management Course. 1. Overview of the Federal Budget Process. 2. The Philosophy of Appropriations Law
Introduction Introduction Financial Management Course 1. Overview of the Federal Budget Process 2. The Philosophy of Appropriations Law 3. Contracts, Grants and Cooperative Agreements 4. Spending Plans,
More informationInformation Technology Processes FinCEN is an agency whose mission is dependent on the effective collection,
Appendix L Project Management and Information Technology Processes FinCEN is an agency whose mission is dependent on the effective collection, dissemination, and meaningful analysis of large quantities
More informationPPM V2.0 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
PPM V2.0 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 2015 1. Getting Started with PPM Life Cycle 2. PPM Life Cycle Process 3. PPM V2.0 and Project Types
More informationSECTION 53 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND E-GOVERNMENT. Table of Contents
SECTION 53 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND E-GOVERNMENT Table of Contents 53.1 Why must I report on information technology (IT) investments? 53.2 What background information must I know? 53.3 How do I ensure
More informationTable of Contents. Agencies are required to provide two reports on financial management and one on grants management:
SECTION 52 INFORMATION ON FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Table of Contents 52.1 What are the general reporting requirements? 52.2 What reporting requirements are addressed? 52.3 Who must report financial and grant
More informationMEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 THE DIRECTOR April 8, 2009 M-09-17 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES FROM: SUBJECT: Peter R.
More informationA. This Directive applies throughout DHS, unless exempted by statutory authority.
I. Purpose Department of Homeland Security DHS Directives System Directive Number: 103-02 Revision Number: 00 Issue Date: 6/19/2014 ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE MANAGEMENT This Directive establishes the Department
More informationRequest for Information (RFI) Electronic Contract Invoicing Solutions
Request for Information (RFI) Electronic Contract Invoicing Solutions Timeline: Released: December 5, 2014 Pre-Submission Conference: The New York City Comptroller s Office ( Comptroller ) is considering
More informationHHS OCIO Policy for Information Technology (IT) Enterprise Performance Life Cycle (EPLC)
Office of the Chief Information Officer Office of the Assistant Secretary for Resources and Technology Department of Health and Human Services HHS OCIO Policy for Information Technology (IT) Enterprise
More informationSENIOR PROCUREMENT EXECUTIVES SMALL AGENCY COUNCIL MEMBERS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROCUREMENT POLICY MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: May 31, 2011 CHIEF ACQUISITION OFFICERS SENIOR
More informationSignificant Revisions to OMB Circular A-127. Section Revision to A-127 Purpose of Revision Section 1. Purpose
Significant Revisions to OMB Circular A-127 Section Revision to A-127 Purpose of Revision Section 1. Purpose Section 5. Definitions Section 6. Policy Section 7. Service Provider Requirements Section 8.
More informationCapital Planning and Investment Control Guide
Department of Homeland Security Capital Planning and Investment Control Guide Version 4.0 May 2007 Prepared by the Office of the Chief Information Officer Document Version History Document Version Version
More informationHow To Write A Federal Budget Plan
GUIDANCE ON EXHIBITS 53 AND 300 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND E-GOVERNMENT Table of Contents 1. Why must I report on information technology (IT) investments? 2. What background information must I know? 3.
More informationOffice of Inspector General
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY < Office of Inspector General Letter Report: Review of DHS Financial Systems Consolidation Project OIG-08-47 May 2008 Office of Inspector General U.S. Department of Homeland
More informationValue to the Mission. FEA Practice Guidance. Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office, OMB
Value to the Mission FEA Practice Guidance Federal Enterprise Program Management Office, OMB November 2007 FEA Practice Guidance Table of Contents Section 1: Overview...1-1 About the FEA Practice Guidance...
More informationExecutive Office of the President. Office of Management and Budget. Fiscal Year 2015 Budget
Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Mission Statement and Background The (OMB) assists the President in the development and execution of his policies and programs and in meeting certain requirements in law such as
More informationEXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503. August 27, 2010
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 August 27, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR SENIOR ACCOUNTABLE OFFICIALS FROM: SUBJECT: Jeffrey D. Zients Deputy Director for
More informationGAO FEDERAL CONTRACTING. Effort to Consolidate Governmentwide Acquisition Data Systems Should Be Reassessed. Report to Congressional Committees
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees March 2012 FEDERAL CONTRACTING Effort to Consolidate Governmentwide Acquisition Data Systems Should Be Reassessed GAO-12-429
More informationHow To Save Money On A Data Center
Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative Data Center Consolidation Plan for the U.S. Small Business Administration Maintained by: The Office of the Chief Information Officer Paul Christy, CIO Revised:
More informationPBGC - Risk Management and Early Warning / Legal Management
PBGC - Risk and Early Warning / Legal Exhibit 300: Capital Asset Plan and Business Case Summary Part I: Summary Information And Justification Section A: Overview 1. Date of submission: Sep 9, 2006 2. Agency:
More informationA. Enhanced Delivery of Information and Services to the Public - Sec. 101, 3602
Department of the Interior Report on the Implementation of the E-Government Act Fiscal Year 2013 A. Enhanced Delivery of Information and Services to the Public - Sec. 101, 3602 Activity #1. Cloud Services:
More informationPortfolio Management through Capital Planning and Investment Control: Program Planning Best Practice Agency Level (for the US Department of State)
Portfolio Management through Capital Planning and Investment Control: Program Planning Best Practice Agency Level (for the US Department of State) Robert A. Horrigan, PMP Knowledge Exchange Forum Moderator
More informationMigration Planning Guidance (Draft)
Financial Management Line of Business Migration Planning Guidance (Draft) Section 1.1 Overview The purpose of the Migration Planning Guidance document is to help agencies prepare for, and manage, a migration
More informationSENTINEL AUDIT V: STATUS OF
SENTINEL AUDIT V: STATUS OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION S CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Audit Division Audit Report 10-03 November 2009 Redacted
More informationClOP CHAPTER 1351.39. Departmental Information Technology Governance Policy TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section 39.1
ClOP CHAPTER 1351.39 Departmental Information Technology Governance Policy TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 39.1 Purpose... 1 Section 39.2 Section 39.3 Section 39.4 Section 39.5 Section 39.6 Section 39.7 Section
More informationEXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 THE DIRECTOR August 6, 2003 M-03-19 MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES FROM: SUBJECT: Joshua
More informationManag. Roles. Novemb. ber 20122
Information Technology Manag gement Framework Roles and Respo onsibilities Version 1.2 Novemb ber 20122 ITM Roles and Version History Version ed By Revision Date Approved By Approval Date Description of
More informationJUSTICE GRANT PROGRAMS. DOJ Could Improve Decision-Making Documentation and Better Assess Results of DNA Backlog Reduction Program Funds
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees July 2013 JUSTICE GRANT PROGRAMS DOJ Could Improve Decision-Making Documentation and Better Assess Results of DNA Backlog
More informationU.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. ORDER DOE O 200.1A Approved: SUBJECT: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT 1. OBJECTIVES. The Department of Energy s (DOE) overarching mission, to advance the national,
More informationDATE REVISION xxxbyxxx. IT Modernization: EA Information Management. DATE: September 2003 AUTHOR: Enterprise Architecture Team
DATE REVISION xxxbyxxx IT Modernization: EA Information Management DATE: September 2003 AUTHOR: Enterprise Architecture Team 1.0 Introduction It is the policy of the United States Government that executive
More information5 FAM 620 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) PROJECT MANAGEMENT
5 FAM 620 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) PROJECT MANAGEMENT 5 FAM 621 GENERAL (Office of Origin: IRM/BMP/SPO/PMD) a. The strategic importance of Information Technology (IT) to the mission of the State Department
More information014-00-01-02-01-1177-00. Mixed Life Cycle. FY2001 or earlier
Integrated Personnel System (IPMS) Exhibit 300: Part I: Summary Information and Justification (All Capital Assets) I.A. Overview 1. Date of Submission: 9/11/2006 2. Agency: Department of State 3. Bureau:
More informationOffice of the Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice
Office of the Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Audit of the Office on Violence Against Women Tribal Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Coalitions Grants Awarded to the Native Alliance Against
More informationINFORMATION SECURITY
NIST Special Publication 800-65 DRAFT Integrating IT Security into the Capital Planning and Investment Control Process Joan Hash, Nadya Bartol, Holly Rollins, Will Robinson, John Abeles, and Steve Batdorff
More informationENTERPRISE PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE
ENTERPRISE PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ISO 9001:2008 STATE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER CHRIS ESTES DEPUTY STATE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER AARON WIENSHIENK DEPARTMENT MANAGER JAMES
More informationOffice of the Chief Financial Officer Grant Award and Financial Management Information. Postaward Instructions
Office of the Chief Financial Officer Grant Award and Financial Management Information Postaward Instructions Postaward Instructions The following steps are provided as a tool for the financial administration
More informationMemorandum of Understanding Between the Department of Energy Managing Partner Financial Management Line of Business And Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Memorandum of Understanding Between the Department of Energy Managing Partner Financial Management Line of Business And Nuclear Regulatory Commission I. Purpose The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding
More informationFederal Segment Architecture Methodology (FSAM): An Overview
Information Resources Management College Federal Segment Architecture Methodology (FSAM): An Overview Dr. Stan Boddie & Prof. Matt Newman 1 a global learning community for government s most promising information
More informationMessage from the Deputy Administrator
December 30, 2015 Contents 1. Background... 4 2. Objectives... 5 3. Government and Management Processes... 5 3.1. Scope of Governance Process and Involvement of Agency Stakeholders... 5 3.2. Alignment
More informationINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT REQUESTS
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT REQUESTS Guidelines & Instructions for Maryland State Agencies Revised Two Step PPR/PIR Approval Process Fiscal Year 2013 Table of Contents Part 1: Overview... 2 1.1 Introduction...
More informationEnterprise Performance Life Cycle Framework
United States Department of Health & Human Services Office of the Chief Information Officer Office of the Assistant Secretary for Resources and Technology Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
More informationTotal Cost of Ownership
Protecting America's Pensions Office of Information Technology IT Investment Owner's Guide to Total Cost of Ownership Version 1.0 Last Updated Date: January 25, 2011 Revision History Document Version Release
More informationAgency Security - What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 The Director M-04-25 August 23, 2004 MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES FROM: SUBJECT: Joshua
More informationWORKING CAPITAL FUND
WORKING CAPITAL FUND LOCATION: The 17 Western States in Reclamation s Service Area. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION: The Reclamation Working Capital Fund (WCF) is comprised of various activities designed to
More informationINNOVATION ACCOUNTABILITY EFFICIENCY
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Justice Programs INNOVATION ACCOUNTABILITY EFFICIENCY The Office of Justice Programs delivers unique value to state, local, and tribal justice
More informationTemplate K Implementation Requirements Instructions for RFP Response RFP #
Template K Implementation Requirements Instructions for RFP Response Table of Contents 1.0 Project Management Approach... 3 1.1 Program and Project Management... 3 1.2 Change Management Plan... 3 1.3 Relationship
More informationOffice of the Mayor (AA0)
(AA0) www.dc.gov Telephone: 202-727-1000 % FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 from Description Actual Approved Proposed FY 2014 Operating Budget $12,193,975 $12,099,801 $12,233,168 1.1 FTEs 87.4 85.0 81.0-4.7 The
More informationTable of Contents. Summary of Changes
SECTION 54 RENTAL PAYMENTS FOR SPACE AND LAND Table of Contents 54.1 Do I need to report on rental payments? 54.2 What materials must I provide? 54.3 What terms do I need to know? 54.4 How do I prepare
More informationFederal Data Center Consolidation Initiative
Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative 2011 Data Center Consolidation Plan & Progress Report (date) 1 Introduction... 2 2 Agency Goals for Data Center Consolidation... 2 3 Implementing Shared Services/Multi-tenancy...
More informationUnited States Department of Health & Human Services Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office. HHS Enterprise Architecture Governance Plan
United States Department of Health & Human Services Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office HHS Enterprise Architecture Governance Plan Version 3.0 February 2007 Approvals The Health and Human
More informationAudit of the Data Center Consolidation Initiative at NARA. OIG Draft Audit Report No. 12-09. May 10, 2012
Audit of the Data Center Consolidation Initiative at NARA OIG Draft Audit Report No. 12-09 May 10, 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Background... 4 Objectives, Scope, Methodology... 7 Audit
More information