JMETC: ENABLING CAPABILITY FOR DISTRIBUTED TEST

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "JMETC: ENABLING CAPABILITY FOR DISTRIBUTED TEST"

Transcription

1 U.S. Air Force T&E Days February 2009, Albuquerque, New Mexico AIAA JMETC: ENABLING CAPABILITY FOR DISTRIBUTED TEST Mr. Chip Ferguson JMETC, Crystal City, VA, USA OVERVIEW With the complexity of new weapon systems growing exponentially, the ability to fully test the system s complete functionality in a live/open air environment is cost prohibitive, and in some cases nearly impossible to accomplish. Therefore, the need for the US Air Force to develop the resources and capabilities necessary for employing a combination of live, virtual and constructive (LVC) test assets is paramount. This is a daunting challenge, not just for the Air Force, but for the entire Department of Defense Test and Evaluation (T&E) community. However, there is an organization and capability already in place within the DoD that will provide the infrastructure and test tools necessary to support Air Force distributed test events and T&E programs. Few organizations in the DoD have the capability to mature technology, produce products, and then to sustain those products to provide a critical capability to the DoD and specifically the DoD T&E community. The Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) under the office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (AT&L), is tasked to insure that the DoD (T&E) workforce, infrastructure, and funding will be fully capable of supporting the Department with quality products and services in a responsive and affordable manner. The goal of the TRMC is to provide robust and flexible T&E capabilities to support the Warfighter. As part of it s charter, the TRMC plans for and assesses the adequacy of the Major Range and Test Facility Bases (MRTFB) to provide adequate testing in support of development, acquisition, fielding, and sustainment of defense systems; it also maintains awareness of other T&E facilities and resources, within and outside the Department, and their impact on DoD requirements. In short, the TRMC is the steward of DoD s T&E infrastructure. To accomplish its charter requirements, the TRMC maintains stewardship of several key investment activities: the Test and Evaluation/Science and Technology (T&E/S&T) program, the Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP), and the Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC). Each of these programs is inextricably intertwined and mutually supporting to provide the TRMC its unique capability to mature T&E technology, produce the tools needed for T&E infrastructure and then sustain those products for the benefit of the T&E community. The T&E/S&T program was established in 2002 by DoD to develop new technologies and processes for future T&E requirements, as well as to expedite the transition of new technologies from the laboratory environment to the T&E community. The T&E/S&T Program is a 6.3 advanced technology development program that matures applicable 6.2 applied research from DoD Service Laboratories and Test Centers, industry, and academia to provide new capabilities required for the testing of future weapon systems. It is the T&E/S&T program that matures the technology needed for the T&E infrastructure. CTEIP is a Congressionally founded program used to fund the development of critically needed, highpriority T&E capabilities for Joint/multi-Service requirements. CTEIP uses a corporate investment approach to combine Service and Defense Agency T&E needs, maximize opportunities for Joint efforts, and avoid unwarranted duplication of test capabilities. CTEIP projects support two basic tasks: investments to improve the test capabilities base and the development of near-term solutions to test capability shortfalls in support of ongoing operational test programs. JMETC is a DoD corporate approach for linking distributed facilities that will enable T&E and acquisition community customers to evaluate new and legacy systems and capabilities in a Joint context. The C4ISR Interoperability Test and Evaluation Capability (InterTEC), which is a CTEIP initiative, is responsible for an integrated test tool suite for Joint Net-Centric testing in a distributed LVC environment. InterTEC s mission is to develop a suite of test products that collectively produce the capability for use by all Copyright 2009 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. The U.S. Government has a royalty-free license to exercise all rights under the copyright claimed herein for Governmental purposes. All other rights are reserved by the copyright owner. 1

2 Services and Defense agencies engaged in C4ISR technical, system of systems, interoperability certification, and net readiness testing. InterTEC provides an integrated test solution for scaleable, extensible, and operationally relevant interoperability T&E. InterTEC uses the Test and Training Enabling Architecture (TENA) in its employment and is a critical partner with JMETC. PROVIDING A DISTRIBUTED T&E INFRASTRUCTURE The DoD Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap Strategic Planning Guidance, FY (November, 2004), promotes the institutional need to test in realistic Joint operational environments. The Roadmap advocates in part for: Establishing a persistent connectivity between battle labs, HITL, simulations, developmental test facilities and live force instrumentation. Using this persistent connectivity to achieve robust live virtual and constructive Joint mission environments for Joint experimentation, development, test and training. This is needed to make comparable the results of these communities. Share test and Joint National Training Capability (JNTC) venues and resources The task of developing and implementing the Joint infrastructure required to achieve this connectivity is the responsibility JMETC. In December 2005, the Program Decision Memorandum II directed the standup of the JMETC program in FY 2007 with responsibility for execution assigned to the Director, TRMC. The JMETC program office was formally stood up October 1, The JMETC mission is to provide a persistent capability for linking distributed facilities enabling DoD customers to develop and test warfighting capabilities in a Joint context. To accomplish this mission, the JMETC program: Maintains a core reconfigurable foundation that enables the rapid integration of LVC resources, Develops products that provide readily available connectivity over existing DoD networks, standard data transport solutions, tools and utilities for planning and conducting distributed integrations, and a reuse repository, and Provides both on-site and help desk customer support for use of the JMETC infrastructure to integrate LVC resources. JMETC provides a DoD-wide capability for the T&E of a weapons system in a Joint context f or Developmental and Operational Testing, Interoperability Certification, Net-ready Key Performance Parameter compliance testing, and Joint Mission Capability Portfolio testing. JMETC will reduce the cost and time to plan and prepare for distributed Joint testing by providing a readily-available, persistent connectivity with standing network security agreements, common integration software for linking sites, and accredited test tools for distributed testing. To support its customers, JMETC also provides expertise in planning, preparing for, and executing distributed test events. JMETC currently has 32 active sites and is in the process of installing 9 more on the Secure Defense Engineering Network (SDREN). We have already achieved 51 instances of re-use that is, 51 times customer programs have avoided having to purchase equipment and resolve security and site connection issues associated with completing an LVC test event. During FY 08, JMETC has supported Single Integrated Air Picture (SIAP) risk reduction events, and the US Army s Future Combat Systems Joint Battlespace Dynamic Deconfliction (JBD2) Test Event. While InterTEC is not the sole supplier of distributed LVC test tools to JMETC, the test tools developed by InterTEC during spiral development and testing, once they are certified by the Joint Interoperability Test Command (JTIC), will be added to the JMETC tool box and available to all customers thru the JMETC Reuse Repository. 2

3 The graphic below represents the relationship between JMETC and InterTEC Spiral development and testing. Figure 1 InterTEC Integration with JMETC Inextricably Intertwined. JMETC supports InterTEC during their spiral development and InterTEC expands JMETC toolbox with certified C4ISR Test Tools InterTEC Spiral 1 tools, which focused on TENA based tools for distributed netcentric testing, have been accredited and implemented at ten Hardware-In-the-Loop (HWIL) sites and two ranges. Completed in mid- Sept, 2008, the InterTEC Spiral 2 test objectives were to produce an integrated tactical and operational C2 system test capability. The infrastructure for this test event included 23 HWIL sites, 3 ranges, 13 new applications (tools) under test, and 2 new synthetic Battlespace environments. Implemented on the JMETC VPN, the Spiral 2 scenario centered on a Joint Fires mission involving ingesting intelligence on enemy incursions to friendly airspace and territory, the creation, dissemination and execution of an Air Tasking Order, and finally repelling enemy activities in a synchronized Joint operation. JMETC was an integral partner in InterTEC s highly complex Spiral 2 test event and was able to apply past lessons learned to insure the success of the event s LVC infrastructure. During planning for the Spiral 2 event, the JMETC Technical Team successfully injected several important lessons learned during support for previous distributed test events. JMETC stressed that configuration control of the network and related equipment, down to the application level, is a critical key to success. Likewise, JMETC emphasized the need for all participating sites to recognize that a seemingly minor change at one site might have a significant unintended impact on the configuration of equipment at many other sites. Other JMETC lessons learned include the recognition of the need to refine our LVC classified collaboration capability (in this case provided to support Spiral 2), to more readily support future customers. This has been a major topic discussed and worked at subsequent JMETC User Group meetings. Lastly the JMETC Technical Team stressed to the InterTEC Spiral2 sites that managing IP address, ports, and protocols to configure firewalls and routers, requires timely and accurate information. This will be a high emphasis area for JMETC team members during event preparation as we assist other customers plan and prepare for future LVC test events. Due to the strong collaboration between the InterTEC and JMETC programs, there have been quantifiable successes for the Testing in a Joint Environment Roadmap. InterTEC Spiral 1 test tools have been certified by JTIC and fielded. Spiral 2 has allowed InterTEC to produce an integrated tactical and Operational (C2) System 3

4 Test Capability. Following support to Spiral 2, JMETC s infrastructure capabilities have been matured and expanded, and the products and lessons learned are being applied now to future testing programs. As Mr Rob Heilman, the InterTEC Director recently said, InterTEC and JMETC produce a Joint Mission Test Capability for information age warfare. JMETC AND SIAP The Single Integrated Air Picture (SIAP) Joint Program Office recently announced a decision to use the JMETC framework for its Joint Combined Hardware in the Loop Exercise Phase 5 (JCHE 5). JCHE Phase 5 will test the implementation of the Integrated Architecture Behavior Model (IABM) in a distributed HWIL test configuration. The primary goal of the JCHE Phase 5 is to assess the performance of the IABM against a subset of requirements in the SIAP Capability Development Document. Phase 5 will include risk mitigation activities that will provide the SIAP Joint Program Office (JPO) and participating Program Offices lessons learned applicable to the furtherance of integration and testing of the IABM into Service combat systems such as Aegis, E-2C, AWACS, and Army IAMD. JMETC is providing the SIAP JPO with persistent connectivity among the four JCHE Phase 5 test sites via a secure VPN on the SDREN. JMETC is also providing common middleware (TENA), distributed test support tools (InterTEC), data management tools, and a secure Voice-Over-IP phone capability to support test execution. Lastly, the JMETC Reuse Repository will provide the SIAP JPO access to relevant distributed event test infrastructure information via an on-line web portal. The decision to rely on the JMETC network followed months of stringent risk-reduction testing in which the JMETC framework (VPN, TENA, and InterTEC tools) was tested side by side with the legacy HLA components. One of the deciding factors in selecting the JMETC framework was the dramatic reduction in message latency. Using the JMETC/InterTEC solution, eighty-five per cent of the messages were delivered with less than 30 milliseconds (ms) latency, whereas the previously used integration solution delivered only seventy-one percent of the messages with less than 30 ms latency. Of the remaining messages, only 0.03% had greater than 40 ms latency using the JMETC/InterTEC solution. The previous integration solution had a full 15% that fell into this higher latency category. A second key deciding factor was the significant long-term cost savings provided by the JMETC solution. While the JMETC tools and architecture are free to the DoD test community and updated at JMETC expense, the previously used integration tools are maintained only at great cost on an event by event basis. The decision not only establishes the use of the JMETC framework during JCHE 5, but it extends to SIAP total lifecycle testing currently scheduled to run through JMETC and FUTURE COMBAT SYSTEMS In August of 2008, JMETC provided LVC infrastructure support to the US Army s Future Combat Systems (FCS), Joint Battlespace Dynamic Deconfliction (JBD2). This complex distributed test event, a Joint test using the JMETC infrastructure and technical support, was a massive undertaking successfully connecting 16 sites and 40 unique LVC systems in four time zones. The Combined Test Office recognized that FCS presents new testing challenges that provide needed test capabilities for Systems of Systems on a grand scale, move, shoot, communicate simultaneously, and seamless integration with Joint elements for Network-centric operations. The 2003 and 2006 FCS Test Evaluation Master Plan codified the need for investments to provide needed test capability for instrumentation, Modeling and Simulation and networking. Multiple investments were initiated to provide needed stimulation, data collection and analysis requirements. Many of these investments are maturing and need to be tested. We emphasize that JDB2 was not a demonstration, but an actual distributed test--the FCS program was provided full requirements traceability and MOEs and MOPs were computed based on actual collected data. The complexity and success of the LVC infrastructure provided by JMETC in JBD2 allowed for the execution and free play of 6 unique Joint Fires and Joint Close Air Support key mission tasks supported by the USA, USAF, USMC, USN and USJFCOM. With multiple customers, JBD2 was designed to establish a rigorous test 4

5 context to examine Army FCS test technology requirements needed for testing in a Joint environment. It was a test of the test network, technologies and distributed environment to be used in future test for Milestone C test activities and decisions. Using the test tools supplied by InterTEC, and TENA transported data, the JMETC VPN was able to provide gateways so other architectures could communicate and provide data into the JBD2 scenario. Supported by JMETC, the JBD2 Test Event provided a valuable risk reduction for critical FCS test technology areas, critical network test technologies and distributed test infrastructure technologies. JBD2 also allowed the JMETC network infrastructure to further develop the baseline capability needed to support system of systems level of testing across the Services. This is a major point in describing JMETC maturity and capabilities in support of our customers. During JBD2, in just over an hour of test execution, and in addition to all the scenario specific tactical message traffic involved, an average of approximately one million unique TENA objects were sent across the JMETC VPN. This already large amount of data was then received, successfully, approximately 20 million times by subscriber applications. Simply put, the JMETC VPV performed superbly in this high profile and high data density test event. The use of the InterTEC test tools and JMETC infrastructure, as well as the JMETC on-site and Help Desk customer support, were instrumental in allowing the very complex JBD2 test event to meet or exceed all test objectives. JMETC and InterTEC can do the same to provide for your distributed test requirements. USAF PROGRAMS Besides these two Joint initiatives, the JMETC program is supporting two USAF programs: Persistent Fire and JEFX 02/03. Sponsored by the Air Force Material Command s Simulation & Analysis Facility (SIMAF), Persistent Fire was a distributed LVC event stressing interoperability among systems and is intended to assess initiatives in support of immediate Digital Close Air Support (DCAS) and Network Enabled Weapons (NEW); its emphasis on airborne data links. JMETC was involved in all phases of the Persistent Fire planning and provided the infrastructure needed to support execution in Nov and Dec of Initiatives evaluated during PF 09-01include: Warplan-Warfighter Forwarder II (WWFII): For dynamic re-planning, the Warfighter in CAOC Current Ops does not have the ability to provide precision target data from the Operational Level (i.e. CAOC floor) directly to airborne platforms via M2M interface. Global Awareness Presentation Services (GAPS)/Airborne Web Services (AWS) capability will provide a demonstration to orchestrate prototyped information services that access Link 16 and FAA data. AWS will make that information available to the AWACS, JSTARS and other PoRs Joint Airborne Network Controller (JANC is an M&S tool designed to test Link 16 network connectivity. It simulates the network design and outputs a connectivity simulation. Using this simulation, network designers are given the ability to verify connectivity between Link 16 participants prior to mission execution. Multifunction Advanced Data Link (MADL) has been identified as the F-35 developmental data link providing for interoperability between aircraft operating in denied access areas. Flexible Architecture Secure Transfer (FAST) As the total user group for Link 16 continues to increase, the fixed timeslot structure is forced to use contention access of tactical edge exchanges of information. FAST uses the current timeslot structure with full compatibility with Link 16, allowing for transmit while receive and transmit on demand, providing greater bandwidth to users. Enhancing Link 16 to allow legacy users access to more data is necessary. JEFX is a Chief of Staff of the Air Force directed series of experiments that combines live, virtual, and constructive (LVC) forces to create a near-seamless warfighting environment to assess the ability of selected initiatives to provide needed capabilities to warfighters. JEFX 09-2 will focus on live fly communication and datalink fidelity drills and provide for risk reduction for the JEFX 09-3 live fly event, and will also provide a venue for limited operations thread execution for selected initiatives. Sponsored by the USAF Global Cyberspace Integration Center (GCIC), Langley AFB, JEFX 09-2/3 will integrate the initiatives into the 5

6 warfighting environment, execute operational threads to employ those initiatives, and assess the initiatives against measures of performance to help create desired capabilities. JEFX 09-2/3 will combine LVC operations to create a realistic environment to warfighters for explore emerging technologies and processes. Emphasis will be on experimentation versus training. Live operations will be conducted on the Nevada Test and Training Range and in associated military operating areas. JMETC is currently involved in planning for JEFX 02/3 and will support execution on Feb-April of CONCLUSION As you read this, we in JMETC are celebrating 2 ½ years as an established program. It s been a fast moving 30 months. Together with CTEIP s InterTEC and TENA projects, we have already demonstrated significant success building a reuseable, persistent and readily available distributed LVC test infrastructure. We are supporting multiple DoD test customers saving them significant resources, time and money. We have expanded our VPN well beyond our customers original expectations and have supported multiple and concurrent Joint LVC test events and will have direct application to USAF T&E programs. We would like to stress that JMETC is being developed and matured based on customer requirements. Our list of customers is growing and I expect a rapid expansion this fiscal year of our capability to provide infrastructure and support to distributed LVC testing. More importantly, we have demonstrated how the unique capability of the TRMC to mature distributed T&E technology, provide distributed test tools and infrastructure, and to then sustain those products, has provided for significant time and cost savings for our T&E customers. There is an old adage in the Acquisition Community test early and test often. The InterTEC tools along with the JMETC infrastructure and distributed testing support are designed to allow LVC distributed test customers to do exactly that. Combat efficiency and effectiveness will be the ultimate result with fielded systems that have been verified to work together. JMETC is here now! Potential users should contact the JMETC office for further information on expected requirements for site participation and JMETC schedules. Chip Ferguson JMETC Program Manager th Street Crystal Gateway North, Suite ext 134 DSN ext 134 Biography: Mr. Bernard Chip Ferguson is the Program Manager for TRMC s Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Program. Since joining the Army in 1965, Mr. Ferguson has held leadership positions in combat units, varied level staffs, the Army s Operational Test and Evaluation Command, and Office of the Director, Test and Evaluation, Office of the Secretary of Defense. Upon retirement from active duty, Mr. Ferguson became a Division Manager and Operations Manager with SAIC supporting test and evaluation in DoD. With his vast experience in distributed testing and evaluation, Mr. Ferguson was selected for his current position in

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 9.986 10.218 19.380-19.380 19.060 19.332 19.217 19.405 Continuing Continuing

More information

Discovering problems when

Discovering problems when Inside the Beltway The ITEA Journal 2014; 35: 132-140 Copyright 2014 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Distributed The Next Step in T&E Bernard Chip Ferguson Deputy Director, Interoperability

More information

Systems Engineering and Integration Efforts. 11 Dec 2013

Systems Engineering and Integration Efforts. 11 Dec 2013 Systems Engineering and Integration Efforts 11 Dec 2013 Mr. Leo Smith Director, PoR Engineering Support ASA(ALT) System of Systems Engineering & Integration Directorate (SOSE&I) Approved for Public Release;

More information

Tactical Targeting Network Technology and Connectivity. Provided by Rockwell Collins

Tactical Targeting Network Technology and Connectivity. Provided by Rockwell Collins Tactical Targeting Network Technology and Connectivity Provided by Rockwell Collins Tactical Targeting Network Technology (TTNT) is a waveform technology based on the Joint Airborne Network-Tactical Edge

More information

Always On-On Demand: Supporting the Development, Test, and Training of Operational Networks & Net-Centric Systems

Always On-On Demand: Supporting the Development, Test, and Training of Operational Networks & Net-Centric Systems Always On-On Demand: Supporting the Development, Test, and Training of Operational Networks & Net-Centric Systems SoS Engineering Collaborators Info Exchange 16 September 2014 Dr. Nancy Bucher ASA(ALT)

More information

Advancing the U.S. Air Force Mission

Advancing the U.S. Air Force Mission Advancing the U.S. Air Force Mission IT Solutions, Professional & Technical Services Agile Support for Today s Operations, Reliable Innovation for Tomorrow s Missions An F-22 in Nevada returns to the

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base OCO ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

More information

Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment

Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG 2015 008 OCTOBER 23, 2014 Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY

More information

National Defense Industrial Association Systems Engineering Division Task Group Report Top Five Systems Engineering Issues

National Defense Industrial Association Systems Engineering Division Task Group Report Top Five Systems Engineering Issues National Defense Industrial Association Systems Engineering Division Task Group Report Top Five Systems Engineering Issues In Defense Industry January, 2003 Vers 9, 1/23/03 Background The Director, Systems

More information

The Challenge. Shipboard crew members need training because cadres are not expected to provide a long-term ConOps for UUV employment.

The Challenge. Shipboard crew members need training because cadres are not expected to provide a long-term ConOps for UUV employment. Enabling Effective & Efficient Fleet UMV Operational Training through Distributed USW Test & Training Technology Michael Kelf Senior Systems Engineer Maritime System Solutions Division SAIC G. Michael

More information

Statement. Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation. Before

Statement. Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation. Before Statement of Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation Before THE UNITED STATES SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE (SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT)

More information

Project Manager Integrated

Project Manager Integrated Project Manager Integrated Training Environment (PM ITE) COL Roland M. Gaddy Jr. PEO STRI Project Manager Integrated Training Environment (PM ITE) 18 June 2015 PM ITE Organization PM Integrated Training

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Management of the Department of Defense Information Enterprise

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Management of the Department of Defense Information Enterprise Department of Defense DIRECTIVE SUBJECT: Management of the Department of Defense Information Enterprise References: See Enclosure 1 NUMBER 8000.01 February 10, 2009 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO 1. PURPOSE. This Directive:

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #139

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #139 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5000.70 May 10, 2012 Incorporating Change 1, Effective March 19, 2014 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Management of DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Activities References:

More information

STRATEGIC SOURCING. Opportunities Exist to Better Manage Information Technology Services Spending

STRATEGIC SOURCING. Opportunities Exist to Better Manage Information Technology Services Spending United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters September 2015 STRATEGIC SOURCING Opportunities Exist to Better Manage Information Technology Services Spending GAO-15-549

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4630.09 July 15, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Communication Waveform Management and Standardization References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction: a. Reissues

More information

Joint Interoperability Certification

Joint Interoperability Certification Joint Interoperability Certification What the Program Manager Should Know Chris Watson (Note: This article is an updated version of Joint Interoperability Certification: What the Program Manager Should

More information

DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts

DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2016-038 DECEMBER 28, 2015 DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5200.39 May 28, 2015 USD(I)/USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Critical Program Information (CPI) Identification and Protection Within Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #131

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #131 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Information Assurance (IA) in the Defense Acquisition System

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Information Assurance (IA) in the Defense Acquisition System Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8580.1 July 9, 2004 SUBJECT: Information Assurance (IA) in the Defense Acquisition System ASD(NII) References: (a) Chapter 25 of title 40, United States Code (b)

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8115.01 October 10, 2005 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: Information Technology Portfolio Management References: (a) Subtitle III of title 40, United States Code (formerly

More information

SPAWAR HQ ARCHITECTURE AND HUMAN SYSTEMS GROUP Human-Systems Integration/Systems Engineering Support Performance Work Statement

SPAWAR HQ ARCHITECTURE AND HUMAN SYSTEMS GROUP Human-Systems Integration/Systems Engineering Support Performance Work Statement SPAWAR HQ ARCHITECTURE AND HUMAN SYSTEMS GROUP Human-Systems Integration/Systems Engineering Support Performance Work Statement 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Department of the Navy Space and Naval Warfare Systems

More information

STATEMENT BY DAVID DEVRIES PRINCIPAL DEPUTY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER BEFORE THE

STATEMENT BY DAVID DEVRIES PRINCIPAL DEPUTY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER BEFORE THE STATEMENT BY DAVID DEVRIES PRINCIPAL DEPUTY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER BEFORE THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE S INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE AND THE VETERANS

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 9410.5C N2/N6 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 9410.5C From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVY

More information

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Integration in the National Airspace System (NAS) Project

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Integration in the National Airspace System (NAS) Project National Aeronautics and Space Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Integration in the National Airspace System (NAS) Project Presented by: Mr. John Walker on behalf of Mr. Chuck Johnson Manager,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED PE 0604940D8Z 136.917 137.648 133.772 134.095 137.462 139.586 141.764 143.949

UNCLASSIFIED PE 0604940D8Z 136.917 137.648 133.772 134.095 137.462 139.586 141.764 143.949 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RDT&E, Defense Wide (0400), Budget Activity 6 0604940D8Z/Central Test and Evaluation Investment

More information

Implementation of the DoD Management Control Program for Navy Acquisition Category II and III Programs (D-2004-109)

Implementation of the DoD Management Control Program for Navy Acquisition Category II and III Programs (D-2004-109) August 17, 2004 Acquisition Implementation of the DoD Management Control Program for Navy Acquisition Category II and III Programs (D-2004-109) Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General Quality

More information

NOV. 2 2 2q11. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 6000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTOr D.C. 20301-6000

NOV. 2 2 2q11. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 6000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTOr D.C. 20301-6000 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 6000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTOr D.C. 20301-6000 CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER NOV 2 2 2q11 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF

More information

Presentation to NDIA 16th Annual Systems Engineering Conference Hyatt Regency, Crystal City, VA 28-31 October 2013

Presentation to NDIA 16th Annual Systems Engineering Conference Hyatt Regency, Crystal City, VA 28-31 October 2013 ALWAYS ON-ON DEMAND": Supporting the Development, Test, and Training of Operational Networks & Net-Centric Systems Presentation to NDIA 16th Annual Systems Engineering Conference Hyatt Regency, Crystal

More information

AF C2 Capability Modernization Leveraging Architectures to Achieve Warfighting Integration

AF C2 Capability Modernization Leveraging Architectures to Achieve Warfighting Integration Headquarters Air Combat Command AF C2 Capability Modernization Leveraging Architectures to Achieve Warfighting Integration This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Mr. John Vona, GS-15 AFC2IC/C2P Purpose Discuss

More information

Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) for DoD

Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) for DoD Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) for DoD Prof. Paul A. Strassmann January 9, 2008 1 Part 1 SOA Requirements 2 The DoD Challenge 3 Most DoD Projects Have Own Data Projects 07 Budget $ Millions Number

More information

Office of Warfighting Integration and Chief Information Officer SAF/CIO A6. Mission Brief

Office of Warfighting Integration and Chief Information Officer SAF/CIO A6. Mission Brief Office of Warfighting Integration and Chief Information Officer SAF/CIO A6 Mission Brief AF Mission The mission of the United States Air Force is to fly, fight and win in air, space and cyberspace. 2 Continue

More information

Guide to Successful Program Management

Guide to Successful Program Management RG Perspective Guide to Successful Program Management 12 Ways to Make Your Program Deliver on Time, on Target, and on Budget 11 Canal Center Plaza Alexandria, VA 22314 HQ 703-548-7006 Fax 703-684-5189

More information

Department of Defense Net-Centric Services Strategy

Department of Defense Net-Centric Services Strategy Department of Defense Net-Centric Services Strategy Strategy for a Net-Centric, Service Oriented DoD Enterprise March 2007 Prepared by the DoD CIO FOREWORD The Internet has facilitated an e-commerce explosion

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8320.05 August 18, 2011 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: Electromagnetic Spectrum Data Sharing References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction: a. Establishes

More information

Financial Management

Financial Management January 6, 2006 Financial Management Report on Army Management of the Army Game Project Funding (D-2006-043) Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Constitution of the United States A Regular

More information

Department of Defense NetOps Strategic Vision

Department of Defense NetOps Strategic Vision Department of Defense NetOps Strategic Vision December 2008 Department of Defense Chief Information Officer The Pentagon Washington, D.C. Table of Contents 1 Purpose...1 2 Introduction...1 2.1 NetOps

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT) Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5105.58 April 22, 2009 USD(I) SUBJECT: Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction reissues DoD Instruction

More information

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Committees

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Committees GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees January 2005 TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT New DOD Space Science and Technology Strategy Provides Basis for Optimizing Investments,

More information

CORPORATE CAPABILITIES. DOD RDT&E Services Enterprise Architecture & Portfolio Management Training & Logistics

CORPORATE CAPABILITIES. DOD RDT&E Services Enterprise Architecture & Portfolio Management Training & Logistics CORPORATE CAPABILITIES DOD RDT&E Services Enterprise Architecture & Portfolio Management Training & Logistics Droidan is a Certified 8(a), Minority, Veteran-Owned Small Business providing professional

More information

DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS. Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process

DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS. Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees May 2014 DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process GAO-14-486 May

More information

The DoD CIO Charter:

The DoD CIO Charter: George Mason University, Fairfax, VA The DoD CIO Charter: A Template for I.T. Governance? Paul A. Strassmann,October 3, 2005 1 Authority for the DoD CIO 2 Traditional Views of the CIO Roles 3 An Expansive

More information

White Paper Assured PNT Inside Military Ground Vehicles Using D3

White Paper Assured PNT Inside Military Ground Vehicles Using D3 White Paper Assured PNT Inside Military Ground Vehicles Using D3 Brian Paul December 2013 Introduction Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has become an integral part of Mission Command systems

More information

Department of Defense. SUBJECT: Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology (IT) and National Security Systems (NSS)

Department of Defense. SUBJECT: Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology (IT) and National Security Systems (NSS) Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 4630.05 May 5, 2004 Certified Current as of April 23, 2007 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology (IT) and National

More information

ReMilNet Service Experience Overview

ReMilNet Service Experience Overview ReMilNet Service Experience Overview ReMilNet s knowledge across all functional service areas enables us to provide qualified personnel with knowledge across the spectrum of support services. This well

More information

Simulation and Training Solutions

Simulation and Training Solutions Simulation and Training Solutions Strong Learning Experiences Available Nowhere Else Advancing Operational Readiness with Leading-Edge Simulation and Training The rapid evolution of military missions,

More information

FACT SHEET. General Information About the Defense Contract Management Agency

FACT SHEET. General Information About the Defense Contract Management Agency FACT SHEET General Information About the Defense Contract Management Agency Mission: We provide Contract Administration Services to the Department of Defense Acquisition Enterprise and its partners to

More information

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301 3010

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301 3010 THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301 3010 ACQUlsmON, TECHNOLOGY AND LOG ISTICS AUG 1 0 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Implementation and Management of the DoD-Wide Continuous Process Improvement/Lean Six Sigma (CPI/LSS) Program

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Implementation and Management of the DoD-Wide Continuous Process Improvement/Lean Six Sigma (CPI/LSS) Program Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5010.43 July 17, 2009 DCMO SUBJECT: Implementation and Management of the DoD-Wide Continuous Process Improvement/Lean Six Sigma (CPI/LSS) Program References: See

More information

ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA 22202-4704

ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA 22202-4704 Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, visit the Web site of the Department of Defense Inspector General at http://www.dodig.mil/audit/reports or contact the Secondary Reports Distribution

More information

Potential Role of an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) in Simulation

Potential Role of an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) in Simulation Doug Stapleton IBM Australia Limited 28 Sydney Avenue, Forrest ACT 2603 AUSTRALIA dougstap@au1.ibm.com ABSTRACT This paper considers eight areas where an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) can contribute to

More information

GAO MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices

GAO MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees March 2013 MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8440.01 December 24, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: DoD Information Technology (IT) Service Management (ITSM) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. Pursuant to the authority

More information

Report No. D-2008-047 February 5, 2008. Contingency Planning for DoD Mission-Critical Information Systems

Report No. D-2008-047 February 5, 2008. Contingency Planning for DoD Mission-Critical Information Systems Report No. D-2008-047 February 5, 2008 Contingency Planning for DoD Mission-Critical Information Systems Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, visit the Web site of the Department

More information

STATEMENT BY MR. CHRISTOPHER A. MILLER PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER DOD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS BEFORE THE SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE

STATEMENT BY MR. CHRISTOPHER A. MILLER PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER DOD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS BEFORE THE SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE STATEMENT BY MR. CHRISTOPHER A. MILLER PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER DOD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS BEFORE THE SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE April 9, 2014 Chairman Durbin and Vice

More information

Ms. Sandy Veautour Chief Systems Engineer PSG

Ms. Sandy Veautour Chief Systems Engineer PSG Ms. Sandy Veautour Chief Systems Engineer PSG SBIR Initiatives Phase I FY 07 3 Awards High Speed Wireless 3-D Video Transmission to Support Virtual Dismounted Training 2 Phase I contract awards Battlefield

More information

Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior Recommendations

Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior Recommendations Report No. DODIG-2013-111 I nspec tor Ge ne ral Department of Defense AUGUST 1, 2013 Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior s I N T

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5000.01 May 12, 2003 Certified Current as of November 20, 2007 SUBJECT: The Defense Acquisition System USD(AT&L) References: (a) DoD Directive 5000.1, The Defense

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base PE 0603755D8Z: High Performance Computing OCO Total FY

More information

Operation IMPACT (Injured Military Pursuing Assisted Career Transition)

Operation IMPACT (Injured Military Pursuing Assisted Career Transition) Operation IMPACT (Injured Military Pursuing Assisted Career Transition) January 2013 Operation IMPACT Program Management Office Northrop Grumman Today Leading global security company providing innovative

More information

Distribution A. Approved for Public Release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW 2014 3001)

Distribution A. Approved for Public Release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW 2014 3001) Distribution A. Approved for Public Release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW 2014 3001) Abstract AFRL Sustainment Science and Technology Strategy Viable United States Air Force (USAF) fleets of aerospace

More information

MHS Health Information Technology Transformation March 1, 2016

MHS Health Information Technology Transformation March 1, 2016 MHS Health Information Technology Transformation March 1, 2016 Colonel Richard Chip Terry Acting Military Health System Chief Information Officer Defense Health Agency Conflict of Interest Richard N. Terry,

More information

DOD DIRECTIVE 4715.21 CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION AND RESILIENCE

DOD DIRECTIVE 4715.21 CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION AND RESILIENCE DOD DIRECTIVE 4715.21 CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION AND RESILIENCE Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Effective: January 14, 2016 Releasability:

More information

DoD Strategy for Defending Networks, Systems, and Data

DoD Strategy for Defending Networks, Systems, and Data DoD Strategy for Defending Networks, Systems, and Data November 13, 2013 Department DoDD of Defense Chief Information Officer DoD Strategy for Defending Networks, Systems, and Data Introduction In July

More information

A Comprehensive Cyber Compliance Model for Tactical Systems

A Comprehensive Cyber Compliance Model for Tactical Systems A Comprehensive Cyber Compliance Model for Tactical Systems Author Mark S. Edwards, CISSP/MSEE/MCSE Table of Contents July 28, 2015 Meeting Army cyber security goals with an IA advocate that supports tactical

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #50

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #50 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400:,, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

ENTERPRISE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT. Creating connections THROUGH SERVICE & WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE

ENTERPRISE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT. Creating connections THROUGH SERVICE & WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE ITA Strategic Plan FY 2011 - FY 2016 U.S. Army Information Technology Agency REALIZING The DoD ENTERPRISE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT Creating connections THROUGH SERVICE & WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE Provide Quality

More information

Common Operating Environment (COE) and Global Information Grid (GIG) Enterprise Services (GES) Mr. Rob Walker 24 September 2003

Common Operating Environment (COE) and Global Information Grid (GIG) Enterprise Services (GES) Mr. Rob Walker 24 September 2003 Common Operating Environment (COE) and Global Information Grid (GIG) Enterprise (GES) Mr. Rob Walker 24 September 2003 Common Operating Environment COE is mission-application independent - A basis for

More information

Information Technology

Information Technology September 11, 2002 Information Technology The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency s Transition of Advanced Information Technology Programs (D-2002-146) Department of Defense Office of the Inspector

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #165

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #165 COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 5.071 5.512 5.956-5.956 6.075 6.063 6.181

More information

APPENDIX J INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT GOALS

APPENDIX J INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT GOALS APPENDIX J INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT GOALS Section 5123 of the Clinger-Cohen Act requires that the Department establish goals for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of agency operations

More information

bñåéêéí=ñêçã=íüé== mêçåééçáåöë= çñ=íüé= péåçåç=^ååì~ä=^åèìáëáíáçå= oéëé~êåü=póãéçëáìã=

bñåéêéí=ñêçã=íüé== mêçåééçáåöë= çñ=íüé= péåçåç=^ååì~ä=^åèìáëáíáçå= oéëé~êåü=póãéçëáìã= NPS-PM-05-027 bñåéêéíñêçãíüé mêçåééçáåöë çñíüé péåçåç^ååì~ä^åèìáëáíáçå oéëé~êåüpóãéçëáìã THE NEW JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (JCIDS) AND ITS POTENTIAL IMPACTS UPON DEFENSE PROGRAM

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3000.09 November 21, 2012 USD(P) SUBJECT: Autonomy in Weapon Systems References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Directive: a. Establishes DoD policy and assigns

More information

Air Force Agency for Modeling & Simulation Mission Brief. Col James Spanky Dennis AFAMS Commander

Air Force Agency for Modeling & Simulation Mission Brief. Col James Spanky Dennis AFAMS Commander Air Force Agency for Modeling & Simulation Mission Brief Col James Spanky Dennis AFAMS Commander Organizational Structure Executive Services Mr. Bob Verica Financial Officer Mr. Joe Lawrence Commander

More information

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS Introduction Systems Engineering Fundamentals SYSTEMS ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS January 2001 SUPPLEMENTARY TEXT PREPARED BY THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY PRESS FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-5565 i Systems

More information

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 99-109 5 FEBRUARY 2015 Test and Evaluation MAJOR RANGE AND TEST FACILITY BASE (MRTFB) TEST AND EVALUATION RESOURCE PLANNING COMPLIANCE WITH

More information

TechNet Land Forces South Small Business Opportunities. Carey Webster Director, Federal Information Solutions Deltek

TechNet Land Forces South Small Business Opportunities. Carey Webster Director, Federal Information Solutions Deltek TechNet Land Forces South Small Business Opportunities Carey Webster Director, Federal Information Solutions Deltek Agenda Review of Upcoming Opportunities for Small Businesses Army 8 Small Business Navy

More information

Architecture Modeling Approach for Net-Centric Enterprise Services (C4ISR/C2 Architecture Track)

Architecture Modeling Approach for Net-Centric Enterprise Services (C4ISR/C2 Architecture Track) A Paper submitted to the 10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium "The Future of C2" Architecture Modeling Approach for Net-Centric Enterprise s (C4ISR/C2 Architecture Track)

More information

Bridging the Digital Divide with Net-Centric Tactical Services

Bridging the Digital Divide with Net-Centric Tactical Services Bridging the Digital Divide with Net-Centric Tactical Services Authors: Scott D. Crane, Charles Campbell, Laura Scannell Affiliation: Booz Allen Hamilton E-mail: crane_scott@bah.com 1. Abstract The DoD

More information

Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Schedule Delays and Reengineering Weaknesses Increase Risks to DoD's Auditability Goals

Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Schedule Delays and Reengineering Weaknesses Increase Risks to DoD's Auditability Goals Report No. DODIG-2012-111 July 13, 2012 Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Schedule Delays and Reengineering Weaknesses Increase Risks to DoD's Auditability Goals Additional Copies To obtain additional

More information

Spectrum Technology Assessment Test Range Spectrum Challenges

Spectrum Technology Assessment Test Range Spectrum Challenges 1 Spectrum Technology Assessment Test Range Spectrum Challenges Mr. Derrick Hinton Principal Deputy Director Test Resource Management Center December 5, 2014 2 Topics of Discussion RF Spectrum Demand Drivers

More information

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2015-045 DECEMBER 4, 2014 DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY

More information

THE JOURNAL OF SUMMER 2010 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC.

THE JOURNAL OF SUMMER 2010 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC. THE JOURNAL OF SUMMER 2010 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC. FAA Portfolio Management: Lessons Learned from the SWIM Program Anne Wells, TASC, Inc, Senior

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs (ASD(PA))

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs (ASD(PA)) Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5122.05 September 5, 2008 DA&M SUBJECT: Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs (ASD(PA)) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Directive: a. Reissues

More information

Program Management Office Provided Adequate Oversight of Two Contracts Supporting the Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System

Program Management Office Provided Adequate Oversight of Two Contracts Supporting the Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System Report No. DODIG-2014-006 I nspec tor Ge ne ral U.S. Department of Defense OCTOBER 25, 2013 Program Management Office Provided Adequate Oversight of Two Contracts Supporting the Defense Enterprise Accounting

More information

Process In Execution Review (PIER) and the SCAMPI B Method

Process In Execution Review (PIER) and the SCAMPI B Method Process In Execution Review (PIER) and the SCAMPI B Method Lorraine Adams, SEI Lynda Rosa, MITRE Fred Schenker, SEI Dale Swanson, MITRE November 17, 2005 Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense SM

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Defense Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) Information Exchange Program (IEP)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Defense Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) Information Exchange Program (IEP) Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 2015.4 February 7, 2002 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Defense Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) Information Exchange Program (IEP) References: (a) DoD Instruction

More information

WEAPONS ACQUISITION REFORM

WEAPONS ACQUISITION REFORM GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate December 2012 WEAPONS ACQUISITION REFORM Reform Act Is Helping DOD Acquisition Programs Reduce

More information

Flexible, Life-Cycle Support for Unique Mission Requirements

Flexible, Life-Cycle Support for Unique Mission Requirements Flexible, Life-Cycle Support for Unique Mission Requirements We Meet the Need Anytime, Anywhere, Any Mission The customers we serve are diverse and so are their requirements. Transformational logistics

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 7045.20 September 25, 2008 USD(P) SUBJECT: Capability Portfolio Management References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Directive: a. Establishes policy and assigns

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5200.44 November 5, 2012 DoD CIO/USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Protection of Mission Critical Functions to Achieve Trusted Systems and Networks (TSN) References: See Enclosure

More information

WORKFORCE COMPOSITION CPR. Verification and Validation Summit 2010

WORKFORCE COMPOSITION CPR. Verification and Validation Summit 2010 WORKFORCE COMPOSITION CPR PEO IEW&S Organizational Assessment VCSA Brief Date 2010 October 13, 2010 This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO PREDECISIONAL LIMITED DISTRIBUTION AS OF: 11 Sep 2010 Verification

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Information Technology Portfolio Management Implementation

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Information Technology Portfolio Management Implementation Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8115.02 October 30, 2006 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: Information Technology Portfolio Management Implementation References: (a) DoD Directive 8115.01, Information

More information

Team Orlando International Team Analysis. By Capital Communications & Consulting, 2013

Team Orlando International Team Analysis. By Capital Communications & Consulting, 2013 Team Orlando International Team Analysis By Capital Communications & Consulting, 2013 Table of Contents The U.S. Army Research Laboratory Human Research & Engineering Directorate Simulation & Training

More information

Option-II Modified: M&S in Decision Risk Analysis and Risk Mitigation

Option-II Modified: M&S in Decision Risk Analysis and Risk Mitigation 1) Course name: M&S in Decision Risk Analysis and Risk Mitigation 2) Course coordinator/poc: Anthony Genna UCSD Extension Assistant Director, Defense Technology agenna@ucsdedu 858-603-2170 (cell) 3) Course

More information

Global Presence. Note: States and countries shaded in orange denote a METI presence.

Global Presence. Note: States and countries shaded in orange denote a METI presence. Overview METI offers a variety of professional support services in Advisory and Assistance Services (A&AS); Engineering and Analysis; Test and Evaluation (T&E); IT Support Services; and Natural Resource

More information

Saving Time & Money Across The Organization With Network Management Simulation

Saving Time & Money Across The Organization With Network Management Simulation Saving Time & Money Across The Organization With Network Management Simulation May, 2011 Copyright 2011 SimpleSoft, Inc. All Rights Reserved Introduction Network management vendors are in business to help

More information

ort Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE OF THE STANDARD ARMY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM-REHOST Report Number 99-165

ort Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE OF THE STANDARD ARMY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM-REHOST Report Number 99-165 it ort YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE OF THE STANDARD ARMY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM-REHOST Report Number 99-165 May 24, 1999 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Additional Copies To obtain additional

More information