UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #131

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #131"

Transcription

1 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March : Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #131 To Program Element Continuing Continuing CS01: Global Combat Support # The Request will be submitted at a later date Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Global Combat Support - Joint (GCSS-J), is a key enabler for achieving Focused Logistics and is essential during peace, contingency, crisis, and war in support of the joint warfighter across the full range of military operations. GCSS-J, the Logistics of Record, provides a Joint Logistics Common Operational Picture to ensure the right personnel, equipment, supplies, and support are in the right place at the right time and in the right quantities to mobilize, move, and sustain all elements of operating forces within a theater or operational area. GCSS-J gathers data from authoritative sources to provide a fused, integrated, near real-time, multidimensional view of combat support and combat service support across joint capability areas. These efforts provide situational awareness of the battlespace and logistics pipeline (e.g., supply, deployment and distribution, engineering, etc.). Using GCSS-J, the joint logistics warfighter no longer needs to log into multiple legacy systems and manually gather data to compile reports. GCSS-J provides real time actionable information in the form of watchboards (e.g., fuels and munitions watchboards) and near real time information in the form of reports and mapping visualizations. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 Previous President's Budget Current President's Budget Adjustments Congressional General Reductions - - Congressional Directed Reductions - - Congressional Rescissions - - Congressional Adds - - Congressional Directed Transfers - - Reprogrammings - - SBIR/STTR Transfer - - Other Adjustment Change Summary Explanation The FY 2013 decrease of -$3.788 is the direct result of the Budget Control Act (BCA) and reduces the overall pace and scope of GCSS development efforts to meet Joint Staff logistics operational needs.

2 Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) CS01: Global Combat Support Years FY 2013 FY 2014 PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 2 of 9 R-1 Line #131 CS01 / Global Combat Support # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Continuing Continuing Quantity of RDT&E Articles # The Request will be submitted at a later date. A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Global Combat Support Joint (GCSS-J) provides the warfighter with a single, end-to-end capability to manage and monitor personnel and equipment through the mobilization process. GCSS-J, the Logistics' of Record, provides a Joint Logistics Common Operational Picture (JLogCOP), ensuring the right personnel, equipment, supplies, and support are in the right place, at the right time, and in the right quantities across the full spectrum of military operations. GCSS-J gathers data from authoritative sources to provide fused, integrated, near real-time multidimensional view of combat support and combat service support across joint capability areas. These efforts provide situational awareness of the battlespace and logistics pipeline (e.g., Supply, Deployment and Distribution, Engineering, etc.). Using GCSS-J, the joint logistics warfighter no longer needs to log into multiple legacy systems and manually gather data to compile reports. GCSS-J provides real-time in the form of reports and mapping visualizations. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 Title: Global Combat Support -Joint Description: GCSS-J is a key enabler for achieving Focused Logistics and is essential during peace, contingency, crisis, and war in support of the joint warfighter across the full range of military operations. GCSS-J, the Logistics of Record, provides a Joint Logistics Common Operational Picture to ensure the right personnel, equipment, supplies, and support are in the right place at the right time and in the right quantities to mobilize, move, and sustain all elements of operating forces within a theater or operational area. FY 2013 Accomplishments: Expanded the intra-theatre distribution capability (e.g., developed widgets for airfield scheduling, seaport berths, seaport schedules); developed WatchBoards for remaining classes of supply (e.g., food and equipment), upgraded the Logistics Common Operational Picture (LogCOP)to provide a user-defined interface (used to access widgets) and began requirements analysis for humanitarian support. FY 2014 Plans: GCSS-J will continue to meet the functional priorities of the joint logistics community, as documented by Combatant Command 129 Requirements Document which are approved and prioritized by Joint Staff (J4). The Program will leverage the Joint Command and Control Common User Interface (JC2CUI) Ozone Widget Framework (OWF) to develop widgets to support

3 Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 CS01 / Global Combat Support B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 Combatant Commands. The focus will be to provide widgets and new capability development using integrated data sources via web services which will provide a fused, integrated, near real-time view of combat support and combat service support throughout the battlespace and the logistics pipeline through interoperability and connectivity of information system. The decrease -$3.799 from FY 2013 to FY 2014 reduces the overall pace and scope of development efforts of the GCSS-J PMO while leveraging efficiencies across the DISA Command and Control (C2) portfolio in support of OSD CIO guidance on IT efficiencies. The GCSS-J PMO will continue to focus on satisfying the most pressing Joint Staff logistics operational needs. Funding will be realigned within the DISA Command and Control portfolio for higher C2 developmental requirements. Plans: GCSS-J will continue to meet the functional priorities of the joint logistics community, as documented by Combatant Command 129 Requirements Document which are approved and prioritized by Joint Staff (J4). The Program will continue to leverage the JC2CUI OWF to develop widgets to support Combatant Commands. The focus will be to provide widgets and new capability development using integrated data sources via web services which will provide a fused, integrated, near real-time view of combat support and combat service support throughout the battlespace and the logistics pipeline through interoperability and connectivity of information system. The increase of +$2.158 from FY 2014 to will allow the program to satisfy additional Joint Staff operational needs in response to on-going real-world events. Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To O&M, DW/PE Continuing Continuing K: O&M, DW Procurement, DW/PE Continuing Continuing K: Procurement, DW Remarks D. Acquisition Strategy The GCSS-J Program Management Office (PMO) uses various contract types, employs large and small contractors, and is focused on achieving agency socio-economic goals and incorporating DoD acquisition reform initiatives in purchasing. The PMO maximizes the use of performance-based contracts and requires contractors PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 3 of 9 R-1 Line #131

4 Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 CS01 / Global Combat Support to establish and manage specific earned value data to mitigate risk and monitor deviations from cost, schedule, and performance objectives. The PMO evaluates performance by conducting thorough Post-award Reviews, monthly Performance Reviews, and bi-monthly In-Process Reviews. The PMO uses a Statement of Objectives (SOO) for development efforts rather than the traditional Statement of Work, as it provides potential offerors flexibility to develop cost-effective solutions and the opportunity to propose innovative alternatives to meet GCSS-J requirements. By stating the requirements in a SOO, the contractor can produce a technical solution methodology to deliver leading edge technology to the warfighter. E. Performance Metrics GCSS-J fields capabilities based on functional priorities of the Combatant Command 129 Requirements Document as approved and prioritized by the functional sponsor, Joint Staff J4. These requirements and goals are translated into releases with specific capabilities, which have established cost, schedule, and performance parameters approved by the DISA's Component Acquisition Executive/Milestone Decision Authority. Metrics and requirements are routinely gathered by the GCSS-J PMO. The metrics from the strategic server sites are analyzed by the PMO to ensure that operational mission threads continue to be met and if system enhancement/capabilities are of benefiting the user. Future capabilities include tools that allow GCSS-J to refine and enhance the type of performance metrics that can be gathered and analyzed. These tools become increasingly important as GCSS-J continues to integrate additional data sources and external applications, which allows GCSS-J to continue to transition to a Service Oriented Architecture and directly supports DoD's net-centric vision of exposing and consuming web services. As GCSS-J usage increases and new capabilities are fielded, performance metrics will ensure that the system is meeting user requirements. 1. Mission and Business Results and Strategic National and Theater Defense - FY 2013 The Key Performance Parameters (KPPs), found in the GCSS-J Acquisition Program line, define baseline measures for the effectiveness of mission performance; the threshold is 95%. Data was gathered from the First Look Site during development and from surveys once the capability was deployed. The baseline measure was met. - FY 2014 (Estimate) The KPPs, found in the GCSS-J Acquisition Program line, define baseline measures for the effectiveness of mission performance; the threshold is 95%. Data is gathered from the First Look Site during development and from surveys once the capability is deployed. Data not yet available. - (Estimate) The KPPs, found in the GCSS-J Acquisition Program line, define baseline measures for the effectiveness of mission performance; the threshold is 95%. Data will be gathered from the First Look Site during development and from surveys once the capability is deployed. Data not yet available. 2. Customer Results and Customer Satisfaction - FY 2013 Help Desk Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) define the baseline measure to evaluate customer satisfaction and provide a service desk assessment; KPI threshold is 80%. Data was gathered from the strategic server site, DECC-Montgomery, and from user surveys. The baseline measure was met. PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 4 of 9 R-1 Line #131

5 Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 CS01 / Global Combat Support - FY 2014 (Estimate) Help Desk KPIs define the baseline measure to evaluate customer satisfaction and provide a service desk assessment; KPI threshold is 80%. Data is gathered from the strategic server site, DECC-Montgomery, and from user surveys. Data not yet available. - (Estimate) Help Desk KPIs define the baseline measure to evaluate customer satisfaction and provide a service desk assessment; KPI threshold is 80%. Data will be gathered from the strategic server site, DECC-Montgomery, and from user surveys. Data not yet available. 3. Processes and Activities and Program Monitoring - FY 2013 line Measure to deploy Increment 7, v7.4 4th Quarter The baseline measure was achieved ahead of schedule in the 3rd Quarter FY 2014 (Estimate) line Measure - To deploy Increment 7, v7.4.1 in 2nd Quarter 2014 and v7.4.2 in 4th Quarter Data not yet available. - (Estimate) line Measure To deploy Increment 8, v8.0 3rd Quarter Data not yet available. 4. Technology and Development - FY 2013 line Measure is the ability to effectively provide end-to-end technical exchange with all external data providers at a 95% effectiveness level. Administrators at the DECCs gather data from system logs to validate effectiveness. The baseline measure was met. - FY 2014 (Estimate) line Measure is the ability to effectively provide end-to-end technical exchange with all external data providers at a 95% effectiveness level. Administrators at the DECCs gather data from system logs to validate effectiveness. Data not yet available. - (Estimate) line Measure is the ability to provide current and accurate information from the ADS at a 95% effectiveness level. Administrators at the Defense Enterprise Computing Centers will gather data from system logs to validate effectiveness. Data not yet available. PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 5 of 9 R-1 Line #131

6 Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 Product Development ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Product Development 1 C/T&M Product Development 2 C/T&M Performing Activity & Location Enterworks : Sterling, VA WFI (DSI) : Manassas, VA Years FY 2013 FY 2014 PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 6 of 9 R-1 Line #131 CS01 / Global Combat Support To Product Development 3 C/CPAF NGIT : Herndon, VA Mar Mar Mar Continuing Continuing Continuing Product Development 4 C/T&M SAIC : Falls Church, VA Product Development 5 C/FFP NGIT, : Reston, VA Product Development 6 SS/FFP UNISYS, : Falls Church, VA Apr Apr Apr Continuing Continuing Continuing Product Development 7 MIPR FGM, : Reston, VA Product Development 8 SS/FFP Merlin, : McLean, VA Product Development 9 MIPR JDTC, : Ft. Eustis, VA Product Development 10 MIPR CSC, : Norfolk, VA Test and Evaluation ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location Test & Evaluation 1 C/CPFF COMTEK, : Sterling,VA Subtotal Years FY 2013 FY 2014 To Test & Evaluation 2 MIPR SSO, : Montgomery Test & Evaluation 3 MIPR DIA : WDC Nov Nov Nov Continuing Continuing Continuing Test & Evaluation 4 C/CPFF Pragmatics : Pragmatics Test & Evaluation 5 C/CPFF Test & Evaluation 6 MIPR AAC, Inc., : Vienna, VA JITC, : Ft. Huachuca, AZ Jul Jul Nov Nov Nov Continuing Continuing Continuing

7 Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 Test and Evaluation ($ in Millions) Category Item Test & Evaluation 7 Test & Evaluation 8 Method & Type MIPR MIPR Performing Activity & Location STRATCOM (DAA) : Bolling AFB, DC DISA (TE LAB Support) : Fort Meade, MD Management Services ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location Years FY 2013 FY 2014 CS01 / Global Combat Support To Dec Dec Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Oct Oct Jul Continuing Continuing Continuing Subtotal Years FY 2013 FY 2014 To Management Services 1 FFRDC MITRE, : Vienna, VA Management Services 2 SS/CPFF UMD, : Eastern Shore, MD Management Services 3 MIPR IDA, : Alexandria, VA Management Services 4 MIPR JFCOM, : Norfolk, Va Remarks Subtotal Years FY 2013 FY 2014 To Project s PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 7 of 9 R-1 Line #131

8 Exhibit R-4, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 CS01 / Global Combat Support Engineering Events & Milestones: Software Sys Requirements Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Engineering Events & Milestones: Preliminary Design Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Engineering Events & Milestones: Critical Design Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Developmental Test & Evaluation (2 Major Releases Annually) or Integration Test (2 Major Releases Annually) Accept/Security Testing (2 Major Releases Annually) Operational Test & Evaluation (2 Major Releases Annually) Operational Test Readiness Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Fielding Decision (2 Major Releases Annually) Acquisition Events Milestone B/C: Increment 8 MS B Acquisition Events Milestone B/C: Increment 8 MS C FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 8 of 9 R-1 Line #131

9 Exhibit R-4A, RDT&E Schedule Details: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 Schedule Details CS01 / Global Combat Support Engineering Events & Milestones: Software Sys Requirements Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Engineering Events & Milestones: Preliminary Design Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Start End Events Quarter Year Quarter Year Engineering Events & Milestones: Critical Design Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Developmental Test & Evaluation (2 Major Releases Annually) or Integration Test (2 Major Releases Annually) Accept/Security Testing (2 Major Releases Annually) Operational Test & Evaluation (2 Major Releases Annually) Operational Test Readiness Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Fielding Decision (2 Major Releases Annually) Acquisition Events Milestone B/C: Increment 8 MS B Acquisition Events Milestone B/C: Increment 8 MS C PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 9 of 9 R-1 Line #131

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element 5.248 0.018 - - - - - - - - Continuing Continuing IA3: Information Systems Security Program

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element 5.248 0.018 - - - - - - - - Continuing Continuing IA3: Information Systems Security Program Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information Systems Agency : March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 19 R-1 Line #183

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 19 R-1 Line #183 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational s Development COST ($ in Millions) R1 Element (Number/Name)

More information

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 President's Budget Submission

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 President's Budget Submission Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 President's Budget Submission April 2013 Defense Contract Management Agency Justification Book Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide THIS PAGE

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2015. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014. Total Cost. COST ($ in Millions) The FY 2015 OCO Request will be submitted at a later date.

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2015. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014. Total Cost. COST ($ in Millions) The FY 2015 OCO Request will be submitted at a later date. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Security Cooperation Agency Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development

More information

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates March 2014 Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Wide Justification Book Volume 5 of 5 Research,, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide THIS

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Health Program Date: February 2015 0130: Defense Health Program / BA 2: RDT&E COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Management System

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #159

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #159 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2015. Quantity of RDT&E Articles 0.000 - - - - - - - - - MDAP/MAIS Code: 488

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2015. Quantity of RDT&E Articles 0.000 - - - - - - - - - MDAP/MAIS Code: 488 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($

More information

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 President's Budget Submission

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 President's Budget Submission Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 President's Budget Submission February 2012 Defense Security Service Justification Book Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #139

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #139 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST

More information

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 President's Budget Submission

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 President's Budget Submission Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 President's Budget Submission February 2015 Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Wide Justification Book Volume 5 of 5 Research,, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0601228D8Z / Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0601228D8Z / Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 1: Basic Research COST ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED United States Special Operations Command Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #261

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED United States Special Operations Command Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #261 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 United States Special Operations Command Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 United States Special Operations Command DATE: April 2013 0400:, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base OCO ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Health Program Date: February 2015 0130: Defense Health Program / BA 2: RDT&E COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Complete Total

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 33142A: SATCOM Ground Environment FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0605080S / Defense Agency Initiatives (DAI) - Financial System

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0605080S / Defense Agency Initiatives (DAI) - Financial System Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Logistics Agency Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Defense Information Systems Agency DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Defense Information

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Health Program Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #9

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Health Program Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #9 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Health Program Date: March 2014 0130: Defense Health Program / BA 2: RDT&E COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 OCO # Total FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 22 R-1 Line #163

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 22 R-1 Line #163 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Security Service Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #178

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Security Service Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #178 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Security Service Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #145

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #145 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 22 R-1 Line #59

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 22 R-1 Line #59 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

Joint Interoperability Certification

Joint Interoperability Certification Joint Interoperability Certification What the Program Manager Should Know Chris Watson (Note: This article is an updated version of Joint Interoperability Certification: What the Program Manager Should

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #200

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #200 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE. ($ in Millions) FY 2005 Estimate $6.994 FY 2004 Estimate $6.824 FY 2003 Estimate $7.612 FY 2002 Actual $5.

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE. ($ in Millions) FY 2005 Estimate $6.994 FY 2004 Estimate $6.824 FY 2003 Estimate $7.612 FY 2002 Actual $5. American Forces Information Service PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE Purpose and Scope ($ in Millions) FY 2005 Estimate $6.994 FY 2004 Estimate $6.824 FY 2003 Estimate $7.612 FY 2002 Actual $5.332 These funds

More information

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates March 2014 Defense Security Service Defense Wide Justification Book Volume 5 of 5 Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide Defense

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #165

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #165 COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 5.071 5.512 5.956-5.956 6.075 6.063 6.181

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #50

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #50 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400:,, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

How To Improve The Defense Communications System

How To Improve The Defense Communications System Briefing to the AFCEA International Cyber Symposium 26 June 2013 Lt Gen Ronnie D. Hawkins, Jr. Director, Defense Information Systems Agency 1 1 UNCLASSIFIED Organizational Changes Command Staff Financial

More information

GAO MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices

GAO MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees March 2013 MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base PE 0603755D8Z: High Performance Computing OCO Total FY

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification PE NUMBER: 0101120F PE TITLE: ADVANCED CRUISE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 07 Operational System Development 0101120F ADVANCED CRUISE Cost ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #62

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #62 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE. ($ in Millions) FY 2007 Estimate $6.765 FY 2006 Estimate $6.521 FY 2005 Estimate $6.796 FY 2004 Actual $6.

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE. ($ in Millions) FY 2007 Estimate $6.765 FY 2006 Estimate $6.521 FY 2005 Estimate $6.796 FY 2004 Actual $6. American Forces Information Service PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE ($ in Millions) FY 2007 Estimate $6.765 FY 2006 Estimate $6.52 FY 2005 Estimate $6.796 FY 2004 Actual $6.74 Purpose and Scope These funds provide

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 30 R-1 Line #241

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 30 R-1 Line #241 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0603461A / High Performance Computing Modernization Program. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0603461A / High Performance Computing Modernization Program. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE WIDE Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Amended President's Budget

DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE WIDE Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Amended President's Budget PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE WIDE Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Amended President's Budget EXHIBIT TITLE PAGE Purpose and Scope/Justification of Funds 2 P-1 Summary 6 P-1C Comparison Report 7 PB-1 Summary of FY 2002-2003

More information

Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment

Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG 2015 008 OCTOBER 23, 2014 Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY

More information

ENTERPRISE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT. Creating connections THROUGH SERVICE & WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE

ENTERPRISE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT. Creating connections THROUGH SERVICE & WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE ITA Strategic Plan FY 2011 - FY 2016 U.S. Army Information Technology Agency REALIZING The DoD ENTERPRISE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT Creating connections THROUGH SERVICE & WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE Provide Quality

More information

DECC Montgomery. Mr. Chris Kemp Director May 2009

DECC Montgomery. Mr. Chris Kemp Director May 2009 DECC Montgomery Mr. Chris Kemp Director May 2009 MISSION Provide information technology for the warfighter when, where, and how it is required and without interruption. VISION Achieve and sustain the most

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #145

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #145 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

Defense Contract Management Agency

Defense Contract Management Agency Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates February 2010 Procurement, Defense-Wide Page Intentionally Blank PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE WIDE DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY EXHIBIT TITLE PAGE Purpose and Scope/Justification

More information

Defense Business Transformation Agency. February 2008

Defense Business Transformation Agency. February 2008 Defense Business Transformation Agency Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates February 2008 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide Exhibit R-1, RDT&E Programs Business Transformation

More information

Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior Recommendations

Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior Recommendations Report No. DODIG-2013-111 I nspec tor Ge ne ral Department of Defense AUGUST 1, 2013 Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior s I N T

More information

MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices

MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees March 2014 MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices GAO-14-309

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 9.986 10.218 19.380-19.380 19.060 19.332 19.217 19.405 Continuing Continuing

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 6 - MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 0604258A - Target Systems Development COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY

More information

Information Technology Processes FinCEN is an agency whose mission is dependent on the effective collection,

Information Technology Processes FinCEN is an agency whose mission is dependent on the effective collection, Appendix L Project Management and Information Technology Processes FinCEN is an agency whose mission is dependent on the effective collection, dissemination, and meaningful analysis of large quantities

More information

DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS. Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process

DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS. Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees May 2014 DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process GAO-14-486 May

More information

Common Operating Environment (COE) and Global Information Grid (GIG) Enterprise Services (GES) Mr. Rob Walker 24 September 2003

Common Operating Environment (COE) and Global Information Grid (GIG) Enterprise Services (GES) Mr. Rob Walker 24 September 2003 Common Operating Environment (COE) and Global Information Grid (GIG) Enterprise (GES) Mr. Rob Walker 24 September 2003 Common Operating Environment COE is mission-application independent - A basis for

More information

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-537 NAS As of December 31, 2011 Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Program Information 3 Responsible

More information

Forecast to Industry 2015

Forecast to Industry 2015 Forecast to Industry 2015 Networking Technologies Ms. Lisa Belt Deputy, Infrastructure Directorate 2 November 2015 87 Infrastructure Directorate IE1 Transport Division IE Infrastructure Directorate Email:

More information

Department of Veteran Affairs. Fred Catoe Office of Cyber and Information Security AAIP Project Manager March 2004

Department of Veteran Affairs. Fred Catoe Office of Cyber and Information Security AAIP Project Manager March 2004 Department of Veteran Affairs Fred Catoe Office of Cyber and Information Security AAIP Project Manager March 2004 Background Smart Cards are a subset of a larger Authentication and Authorization Infrastructure

More information

Defense Contract Management Agency

Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Contract Management Agency Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Budget Estimates February 2011 Procurement, Defense-Wide PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE WIDE DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY EXHIBIT TITLE PAGE Purpose

More information

Data Consolidation and Application Optimization (DCAO) Organization

Data Consolidation and Application Optimization (DCAO) Organization Data Consolidation and Application Optimization (DCAO) Organization 11 February 2015 Presented to: DON CIO IT Conference San Diego Convention Center Mr. John Pope DCAO Director Space and Naval Warfare

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8440.01 December 24, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: DoD Information Technology (IT) Service Management (ITSM) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. Pursuant to the authority

More information

Acquisition. Army Claims Service Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (D-2002-109) June 19, 2002

Acquisition. Army Claims Service Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (D-2002-109) June 19, 2002 June 19, 2002 Acquisition Army Claims Service Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (D-2002-109) Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General Quality Integrity Accountability Additional

More information

DLA Balanced Scorecard. Janet Foote Senior Strategic Planner 16 December 2004

DLA Balanced Scorecard. Janet Foote Senior Strategic Planner 16 December 2004 DLA Balanced Scorecard Janet Foote Senior Strategic Planner 16 December 2004 Today s Session Defense Logistics Agency s Scorecard Defense Information Systems Agency s Scorecard Collaboration Benefits We

More information

Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) for DoD

Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) for DoD Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) for DoD Prof. Paul A. Strassmann January 9, 2008 1 Part 1 SOA Requirements 2 The DoD Challenge 3 Most DoD Projects Have Own Data Projects 07 Budget $ Millions Number

More information

The DoD CIO Charter:

The DoD CIO Charter: George Mason University, Fairfax, VA The DoD CIO Charter: A Template for I.T. Governance? Paul A. Strassmann,October 3, 2005 1 Authority for the DoD CIO 2 Traditional Views of the CIO Roles 3 An Expansive

More information

Advancing the U.S. Air Force Mission

Advancing the U.S. Air Force Mission Advancing the U.S. Air Force Mission IT Solutions, Professional & Technical Services Agile Support for Today s Operations, Reliable Innovation for Tomorrow s Missions An F-22 in Nevada returns to the

More information

DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts

DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2016-038 DECEMBER 28, 2015 DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY

More information

Program Management Office Provided Adequate Oversight of Two Contracts Supporting the Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System

Program Management Office Provided Adequate Oversight of Two Contracts Supporting the Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System Report No. DODIG-2014-006 I nspec tor Ge ne ral U.S. Department of Defense OCTOBER 25, 2013 Program Management Office Provided Adequate Oversight of Two Contracts Supporting the Defense Enterprise Accounting

More information

Appendix. DoD SBIR Proposal Guidance. Background Research Guidance (and the Blackout Period ) F-2

Appendix. DoD SBIR Proposal Guidance. Background Research Guidance (and the Blackout Period ) F-2 Appendix DoD SBIR Proposal Guidance Background Research Guidance (and the Blackout Period ) F-2 Sample RDT&E Budget Item Justification (Navy PE 0604274N) F-7 DoD (Air Force) Phase I Proposal Format Guidelines

More information

How To Implement Itil V3

How To Implement Itil V3 2009 NMCI Conference: Implementing ITIL Session 1: ITSM Process ITSM COE Agenda Background ITSM Overview ITIL and Service Delivery Adopting ITIL to NGEN SE&I Activities 2 Background Develop Government

More information

WORKFORCE COMPOSITION CPR. Verification and Validation Summit 2010

WORKFORCE COMPOSITION CPR. Verification and Validation Summit 2010 WORKFORCE COMPOSITION CPR PEO IEW&S Organizational Assessment VCSA Brief Date 2010 October 13, 2010 This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO PREDECISIONAL LIMITED DISTRIBUTION AS OF: 11 Sep 2010 Verification

More information

APAN Brief. Governance

APAN Brief. Governance APAN Brief Governance Table of Contents Roles and Relationships Significant Events Program Management Governance Overview Responsibilities Points of Contact Acronyms 2 Roles and Relationships OVERSIGHT

More information

Website: http://www.acq.osd.mil/ic/cwp.html Email: osd.coalition.warfare@mail.mil

Website: http://www.acq.osd.mil/ic/cwp.html Email: osd.coalition.warfare@mail.mil Overview CWP provides funding on a competitive basis to DoD organizations to conduct cooperative research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) projects with foreign partners. The goals of the CWP

More information

bñåéêéí=ñêçã=íüé== mêçåééçáåöë= çñ=íüé= péåçåç=^ååì~ä=^åèìáëáíáçå= oéëé~êåü=póãéçëáìã=

bñåéêéí=ñêçã=íüé== mêçåééçáåöë= çñ=íüé= péåçåç=^ååì~ä=^åèìáëáíáçå= oéëé~êåü=póãéçëáìã= NPS-PM-05-027 bñåéêéíñêçãíüé mêçåééçáåöë çñíüé péåçåç^ååì~ä^åèìáëáíáçå oéëé~êåüpóãéçëáìã THE NEW JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (JCIDS) AND ITS POTENTIAL IMPACTS UPON DEFENSE PROGRAM

More information

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2015-045 DECEMBER 4, 2014 DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY

More information

ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA 22202-4704

ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA 22202-4704 Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, visit the Web site of the Department of Defense Inspector General at http://www.dodig.mil/audit/reports or contact the Secondary Reports Distribution

More information

Defense Healthcare Management Systems

Defense Healthcare Management Systems Defense Healthcare Management Systems Recovering Warrior Task Force Interagency Program Office (IPO) Review Mr. Christopher Miller 28 January 2014 1 Agenda Topic Introduction Program Executive Office (PEO)

More information

Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System DEAMS

Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System DEAMS DEAMS Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System DEAMS Modernizing Air Force Accounting and Finance Presented by: Ms. Patricia Hagin DFAS-IN/JJEAB DEAMS Functional Manager Overview DEAMS Historical

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8140.01 August 11, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Cyberspace Workforce Management References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This directive: a. Reissues and renumbers DoD Directive

More information

How To Get A Production Line Of A Cloud Based System To Work For A Military

How To Get A Production Line Of A Cloud Based System To Work For A Military Global Combat Support System- Marine Corps (GCSS-MC) Program Overview and Status Andrew Dwyer, PM GCSS-MC 1 May 2012 Agenda Bottom Line Up Front GCSS-MC Program Overview Increment 1 Concept of Employment

More information

Information Technology Management

Information Technology Management May 18, 2006 Information Technology Management Acquisition of the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (D-2006-089) Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Quality Integrity

More information

GAO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DASHBOARD. Opportunities Exist to Improve Transparency and Oversight of Investment Risk at Select Agencies

GAO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DASHBOARD. Opportunities Exist to Improve Transparency and Oversight of Investment Risk at Select Agencies GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters October 2012 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DASHBOARD Opportunities Exist to Improve Transparency and Oversight of Investment

More information

DISA Acquisition Opportunities

DISA Acquisition Opportunities DISA Acquisition Opportunities 2014 Forecast to Industry 1 CAE Acquisition Opportunities GCCS-J Program support Base year and one 1 year option with total estimated value of $5M Current PoP ends 28 Nov

More information

AF C2 Capability Modernization Leveraging Architectures to Achieve Warfighting Integration

AF C2 Capability Modernization Leveraging Architectures to Achieve Warfighting Integration Headquarters Air Combat Command AF C2 Capability Modernization Leveraging Architectures to Achieve Warfighting Integration This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Mr. John Vona, GS-15 AFC2IC/C2P Purpose Discuss

More information

DEFENSE LOGISTICS. Army Should Track Financial Benefits Realized from its Logistics Modernization Program. Report to Congressional Requesters

DEFENSE LOGISTICS. Army Should Track Financial Benefits Realized from its Logistics Modernization Program. Report to Congressional Requesters United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters November 2013 DEFENSE LOGISTICS Army Should Track Financial Benefits Realized from its Logistics Modernization Program

More information

Joint Operational Medicine Information Systems Program

Joint Operational Medicine Information Systems Program COL John R. Bailey, Deputy Program Manager 2015 Defense Health Information Technology Symposium Joint Operational Medicine Information Systems Program 1 DHA Vision A joint, integrated, premier system of

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Information Assurance (IA) in the Defense Acquisition System

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Information Assurance (IA) in the Defense Acquisition System Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8580.1 July 9, 2004 SUBJECT: Information Assurance (IA) in the Defense Acquisition System ASD(NII) References: (a) Chapter 25 of title 40, United States Code (b)

More information

ort Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE OF THE STANDARD ARMY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM-REHOST Report Number 99-165

ort Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE OF THE STANDARD ARMY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM-REHOST Report Number 99-165 it ort YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE OF THE STANDARD ARMY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM-REHOST Report Number 99-165 May 24, 1999 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Additional Copies To obtain additional

More information

Enterprise Projects Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Third Quarter Report

Enterprise Projects Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Third Quarter Report Enterprise Projects Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Third Quarter Report Enterprise Projects Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Third Quarter Report The Enterprise Program Investment Council (EPIC) is responsible for governance

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5000.01 May 12, 2003 Certified Current as of November 20, 2007 SUBJECT: The Defense Acquisition System USD(AT&L) References: (a) DoD Directive 5000.1, The Defense

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0603925N / Directed Energy and Electric Weapon System. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0603925N / Directed Energy and Electric Weapon System. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)

More information

STATEMENT BY DAVID DEVRIES PRINCIPAL DEPUTY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER BEFORE THE

STATEMENT BY DAVID DEVRIES PRINCIPAL DEPUTY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER BEFORE THE STATEMENT BY DAVID DEVRIES PRINCIPAL DEPUTY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER BEFORE THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE S INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE AND THE VETERANS

More information

PEO SYSCOM Conference Joint Pgm Management Perspective

PEO SYSCOM Conference Joint Pgm Management Perspective Defense rmation Systems Agency A Combat Support Agency PEO SYSCOM Conference Joint Pgm Management Perspective Brigadier General Pete Hoene, USAF Program Executive Officer Command & Control Capabilities

More information

Defense Business Systems Investment Management Process Guidance. June 2012

Defense Business Systems Investment Management Process Guidance. June 2012 Defense Business Systems Investment Management Process Guidance June 2012 Executive Summary Section 901 of the Fiscal Year 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (FY2012 NDAA), now codified at Title 10

More information

Department of Defense NetOps Strategic Vision

Department of Defense NetOps Strategic Vision Department of Defense NetOps Strategic Vision December 2008 Department of Defense Chief Information Officer The Pentagon Washington, D.C. Table of Contents 1 Purpose...1 2 Introduction...1 2.1 NetOps

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5015.02 February 24, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: DoD Records Management Program References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction reissues DoD Directive (DoDD)

More information

Statement. Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation. Before

Statement. Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation. Before Statement of Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation Before THE UNITED STATES SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE (SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT)

More information

Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA)

Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Fiscal Year 2011 Budget Estimates Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) February 2010 DCMA 87 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (This page intentionally left blank.) DCMA 88 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

More information

DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY P. O. BOX 549 FORT MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-0549. Joint Interoperability Test Command (JTE) 7 Jan 15

DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY P. O. BOX 549 FORT MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-0549. Joint Interoperability Test Command (JTE) 7 Jan 15 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY P. O. BOX 549 FORT MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-0549 IN REPLY REFER TO: Joint Interoperability Test Command (JTE) 7 Jan 15 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Extension of

More information

Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Schedule Delays and Reengineering Weaknesses Increase Risks to DoD's Auditability Goals

Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Schedule Delays and Reengineering Weaknesses Increase Risks to DoD's Auditability Goals Report No. DODIG-2012-111 July 13, 2012 Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Schedule Delays and Reengineering Weaknesses Increase Risks to DoD's Auditability Goals Additional Copies To obtain additional

More information

Increasing Environmental Services Buying Power Through Strategic Sourcing - Continued

Increasing Environmental Services Buying Power Through Strategic Sourcing - Continued Power The operational Army has dedicated itself to transformation as a deliberate, strategic initiative to shed old concepts and processes so that we can successfully face an era of persistent conflict

More information