UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #131
|
|
- Clementine Merritt
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March : Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #131 To Program Element Continuing Continuing CS01: Global Combat Support # The Request will be submitted at a later date Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Global Combat Support - Joint (GCSS-J), is a key enabler for achieving Focused Logistics and is essential during peace, contingency, crisis, and war in support of the joint warfighter across the full range of military operations. GCSS-J, the Logistics of Record, provides a Joint Logistics Common Operational Picture to ensure the right personnel, equipment, supplies, and support are in the right place at the right time and in the right quantities to mobilize, move, and sustain all elements of operating forces within a theater or operational area. GCSS-J gathers data from authoritative sources to provide a fused, integrated, near real-time, multidimensional view of combat support and combat service support across joint capability areas. These efforts provide situational awareness of the battlespace and logistics pipeline (e.g., supply, deployment and distribution, engineering, etc.). Using GCSS-J, the joint logistics warfighter no longer needs to log into multiple legacy systems and manually gather data to compile reports. GCSS-J provides real time actionable information in the form of watchboards (e.g., fuels and munitions watchboards) and near real time information in the form of reports and mapping visualizations. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 Previous President's Budget Current President's Budget Adjustments Congressional General Reductions - - Congressional Directed Reductions - - Congressional Rescissions - - Congressional Adds - - Congressional Directed Transfers - - Reprogrammings - - SBIR/STTR Transfer - - Other Adjustment Change Summary Explanation The FY 2013 decrease of -$3.788 is the direct result of the Budget Control Act (BCA) and reduces the overall pace and scope of GCSS development efforts to meet Joint Staff logistics operational needs.
2 Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) CS01: Global Combat Support Years FY 2013 FY 2014 PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 2 of 9 R-1 Line #131 CS01 / Global Combat Support # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Continuing Continuing Quantity of RDT&E Articles # The Request will be submitted at a later date. A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Global Combat Support Joint (GCSS-J) provides the warfighter with a single, end-to-end capability to manage and monitor personnel and equipment through the mobilization process. GCSS-J, the Logistics' of Record, provides a Joint Logistics Common Operational Picture (JLogCOP), ensuring the right personnel, equipment, supplies, and support are in the right place, at the right time, and in the right quantities across the full spectrum of military operations. GCSS-J gathers data from authoritative sources to provide fused, integrated, near real-time multidimensional view of combat support and combat service support across joint capability areas. These efforts provide situational awareness of the battlespace and logistics pipeline (e.g., Supply, Deployment and Distribution, Engineering, etc.). Using GCSS-J, the joint logistics warfighter no longer needs to log into multiple legacy systems and manually gather data to compile reports. GCSS-J provides real-time in the form of reports and mapping visualizations. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 Title: Global Combat Support -Joint Description: GCSS-J is a key enabler for achieving Focused Logistics and is essential during peace, contingency, crisis, and war in support of the joint warfighter across the full range of military operations. GCSS-J, the Logistics of Record, provides a Joint Logistics Common Operational Picture to ensure the right personnel, equipment, supplies, and support are in the right place at the right time and in the right quantities to mobilize, move, and sustain all elements of operating forces within a theater or operational area. FY 2013 Accomplishments: Expanded the intra-theatre distribution capability (e.g., developed widgets for airfield scheduling, seaport berths, seaport schedules); developed WatchBoards for remaining classes of supply (e.g., food and equipment), upgraded the Logistics Common Operational Picture (LogCOP)to provide a user-defined interface (used to access widgets) and began requirements analysis for humanitarian support. FY 2014 Plans: GCSS-J will continue to meet the functional priorities of the joint logistics community, as documented by Combatant Command 129 Requirements Document which are approved and prioritized by Joint Staff (J4). The Program will leverage the Joint Command and Control Common User Interface (JC2CUI) Ozone Widget Framework (OWF) to develop widgets to support
3 Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 CS01 / Global Combat Support B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 Combatant Commands. The focus will be to provide widgets and new capability development using integrated data sources via web services which will provide a fused, integrated, near real-time view of combat support and combat service support throughout the battlespace and the logistics pipeline through interoperability and connectivity of information system. The decrease -$3.799 from FY 2013 to FY 2014 reduces the overall pace and scope of development efforts of the GCSS-J PMO while leveraging efficiencies across the DISA Command and Control (C2) portfolio in support of OSD CIO guidance on IT efficiencies. The GCSS-J PMO will continue to focus on satisfying the most pressing Joint Staff logistics operational needs. Funding will be realigned within the DISA Command and Control portfolio for higher C2 developmental requirements. Plans: GCSS-J will continue to meet the functional priorities of the joint logistics community, as documented by Combatant Command 129 Requirements Document which are approved and prioritized by Joint Staff (J4). The Program will continue to leverage the JC2CUI OWF to develop widgets to support Combatant Commands. The focus will be to provide widgets and new capability development using integrated data sources via web services which will provide a fused, integrated, near real-time view of combat support and combat service support throughout the battlespace and the logistics pipeline through interoperability and connectivity of information system. The increase of +$2.158 from FY 2014 to will allow the program to satisfy additional Joint Staff operational needs in response to on-going real-world events. Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To O&M, DW/PE Continuing Continuing K: O&M, DW Procurement, DW/PE Continuing Continuing K: Procurement, DW Remarks D. Acquisition Strategy The GCSS-J Program Management Office (PMO) uses various contract types, employs large and small contractors, and is focused on achieving agency socio-economic goals and incorporating DoD acquisition reform initiatives in purchasing. The PMO maximizes the use of performance-based contracts and requires contractors PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 3 of 9 R-1 Line #131
4 Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 CS01 / Global Combat Support to establish and manage specific earned value data to mitigate risk and monitor deviations from cost, schedule, and performance objectives. The PMO evaluates performance by conducting thorough Post-award Reviews, monthly Performance Reviews, and bi-monthly In-Process Reviews. The PMO uses a Statement of Objectives (SOO) for development efforts rather than the traditional Statement of Work, as it provides potential offerors flexibility to develop cost-effective solutions and the opportunity to propose innovative alternatives to meet GCSS-J requirements. By stating the requirements in a SOO, the contractor can produce a technical solution methodology to deliver leading edge technology to the warfighter. E. Performance Metrics GCSS-J fields capabilities based on functional priorities of the Combatant Command 129 Requirements Document as approved and prioritized by the functional sponsor, Joint Staff J4. These requirements and goals are translated into releases with specific capabilities, which have established cost, schedule, and performance parameters approved by the DISA's Component Acquisition Executive/Milestone Decision Authority. Metrics and requirements are routinely gathered by the GCSS-J PMO. The metrics from the strategic server sites are analyzed by the PMO to ensure that operational mission threads continue to be met and if system enhancement/capabilities are of benefiting the user. Future capabilities include tools that allow GCSS-J to refine and enhance the type of performance metrics that can be gathered and analyzed. These tools become increasingly important as GCSS-J continues to integrate additional data sources and external applications, which allows GCSS-J to continue to transition to a Service Oriented Architecture and directly supports DoD's net-centric vision of exposing and consuming web services. As GCSS-J usage increases and new capabilities are fielded, performance metrics will ensure that the system is meeting user requirements. 1. Mission and Business Results and Strategic National and Theater Defense - FY 2013 The Key Performance Parameters (KPPs), found in the GCSS-J Acquisition Program line, define baseline measures for the effectiveness of mission performance; the threshold is 95%. Data was gathered from the First Look Site during development and from surveys once the capability was deployed. The baseline measure was met. - FY 2014 (Estimate) The KPPs, found in the GCSS-J Acquisition Program line, define baseline measures for the effectiveness of mission performance; the threshold is 95%. Data is gathered from the First Look Site during development and from surveys once the capability is deployed. Data not yet available. - (Estimate) The KPPs, found in the GCSS-J Acquisition Program line, define baseline measures for the effectiveness of mission performance; the threshold is 95%. Data will be gathered from the First Look Site during development and from surveys once the capability is deployed. Data not yet available. 2. Customer Results and Customer Satisfaction - FY 2013 Help Desk Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) define the baseline measure to evaluate customer satisfaction and provide a service desk assessment; KPI threshold is 80%. Data was gathered from the strategic server site, DECC-Montgomery, and from user surveys. The baseline measure was met. PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 4 of 9 R-1 Line #131
5 Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 CS01 / Global Combat Support - FY 2014 (Estimate) Help Desk KPIs define the baseline measure to evaluate customer satisfaction and provide a service desk assessment; KPI threshold is 80%. Data is gathered from the strategic server site, DECC-Montgomery, and from user surveys. Data not yet available. - (Estimate) Help Desk KPIs define the baseline measure to evaluate customer satisfaction and provide a service desk assessment; KPI threshold is 80%. Data will be gathered from the strategic server site, DECC-Montgomery, and from user surveys. Data not yet available. 3. Processes and Activities and Program Monitoring - FY 2013 line Measure to deploy Increment 7, v7.4 4th Quarter The baseline measure was achieved ahead of schedule in the 3rd Quarter FY 2014 (Estimate) line Measure - To deploy Increment 7, v7.4.1 in 2nd Quarter 2014 and v7.4.2 in 4th Quarter Data not yet available. - (Estimate) line Measure To deploy Increment 8, v8.0 3rd Quarter Data not yet available. 4. Technology and Development - FY 2013 line Measure is the ability to effectively provide end-to-end technical exchange with all external data providers at a 95% effectiveness level. Administrators at the DECCs gather data from system logs to validate effectiveness. The baseline measure was met. - FY 2014 (Estimate) line Measure is the ability to effectively provide end-to-end technical exchange with all external data providers at a 95% effectiveness level. Administrators at the DECCs gather data from system logs to validate effectiveness. Data not yet available. - (Estimate) line Measure is the ability to provide current and accurate information from the ADS at a 95% effectiveness level. Administrators at the Defense Enterprise Computing Centers will gather data from system logs to validate effectiveness. Data not yet available. PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 5 of 9 R-1 Line #131
6 Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 Product Development ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Product Development 1 C/T&M Product Development 2 C/T&M Performing Activity & Location Enterworks : Sterling, VA WFI (DSI) : Manassas, VA Years FY 2013 FY 2014 PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 6 of 9 R-1 Line #131 CS01 / Global Combat Support To Product Development 3 C/CPAF NGIT : Herndon, VA Mar Mar Mar Continuing Continuing Continuing Product Development 4 C/T&M SAIC : Falls Church, VA Product Development 5 C/FFP NGIT, : Reston, VA Product Development 6 SS/FFP UNISYS, : Falls Church, VA Apr Apr Apr Continuing Continuing Continuing Product Development 7 MIPR FGM, : Reston, VA Product Development 8 SS/FFP Merlin, : McLean, VA Product Development 9 MIPR JDTC, : Ft. Eustis, VA Product Development 10 MIPR CSC, : Norfolk, VA Test and Evaluation ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location Test & Evaluation 1 C/CPFF COMTEK, : Sterling,VA Subtotal Years FY 2013 FY 2014 To Test & Evaluation 2 MIPR SSO, : Montgomery Test & Evaluation 3 MIPR DIA : WDC Nov Nov Nov Continuing Continuing Continuing Test & Evaluation 4 C/CPFF Pragmatics : Pragmatics Test & Evaluation 5 C/CPFF Test & Evaluation 6 MIPR AAC, Inc., : Vienna, VA JITC, : Ft. Huachuca, AZ Jul Jul Nov Nov Nov Continuing Continuing Continuing
7 Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Analysis: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 Test and Evaluation ($ in Millions) Category Item Test & Evaluation 7 Test & Evaluation 8 Method & Type MIPR MIPR Performing Activity & Location STRATCOM (DAA) : Bolling AFB, DC DISA (TE LAB Support) : Fort Meade, MD Management Services ($ in Millions) Category Item Method & Type Performing Activity & Location Years FY 2013 FY 2014 CS01 / Global Combat Support To Dec Dec Dec Continuing Continuing Continuing Oct Oct Jul Continuing Continuing Continuing Subtotal Years FY 2013 FY 2014 To Management Services 1 FFRDC MITRE, : Vienna, VA Management Services 2 SS/CPFF UMD, : Eastern Shore, MD Management Services 3 MIPR IDA, : Alexandria, VA Management Services 4 MIPR JFCOM, : Norfolk, Va Remarks Subtotal Years FY 2013 FY 2014 To Project s PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 7 of 9 R-1 Line #131
8 Exhibit R-4, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 CS01 / Global Combat Support Engineering Events & Milestones: Software Sys Requirements Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Engineering Events & Milestones: Preliminary Design Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Engineering Events & Milestones: Critical Design Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Developmental Test & Evaluation (2 Major Releases Annually) or Integration Test (2 Major Releases Annually) Accept/Security Testing (2 Major Releases Annually) Operational Test & Evaluation (2 Major Releases Annually) Operational Test Readiness Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Fielding Decision (2 Major Releases Annually) Acquisition Events Milestone B/C: Increment 8 MS B Acquisition Events Milestone B/C: Increment 8 MS C FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 8 of 9 R-1 Line #131
9 Exhibit R-4A, RDT&E Schedule Details: PB 2015 Defense Information s Agency : March 2014 Schedule Details CS01 / Global Combat Support Engineering Events & Milestones: Software Sys Requirements Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Engineering Events & Milestones: Preliminary Design Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Start End Events Quarter Year Quarter Year Engineering Events & Milestones: Critical Design Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Developmental Test & Evaluation (2 Major Releases Annually) or Integration Test (2 Major Releases Annually) Accept/Security Testing (2 Major Releases Annually) Operational Test & Evaluation (2 Major Releases Annually) Operational Test Readiness Review (2 Major Releases Annually) Fielding Decision (2 Major Releases Annually) Acquisition Events Milestone B/C: Increment 8 MS B Acquisition Events Milestone B/C: Increment 8 MS C PE K: Global Combat Support Defense Information s Agency Page 9 of 9 R-1 Line #131
UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element 5.248 0.018 - - - - - - - - Continuing Continuing IA3: Information Systems Security Program
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information Systems Agency : March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 19 R-1 Line #183
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational s Development COST ($ in Millions) R1 Element (Number/Name)
More informationDepartment of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 President's Budget Submission
Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 President's Budget Submission April 2013 Defense Contract Management Agency Justification Book Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide THIS PAGE
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2015. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014. Total Cost. COST ($ in Millions) The FY 2015 OCO Request will be submitted at a later date.
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Security Cooperation Agency Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
More informationDepartment of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates
Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates March 2014 Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Wide Justification Book Volume 5 of 5 Research,, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide THIS
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Health Program Date: February 2015 0130: Defense Health Program / BA 2: RDT&E COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Management System
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #159
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2015. Quantity of RDT&E Articles 0.000 - - - - - - - - - MDAP/MAIS Code: 488
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($
More informationDepartment of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 President's Budget Submission
Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 President's Budget Submission February 2012 Defense Security Service Justification Book Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #139
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST
More informationDepartment of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 President's Budget Submission
Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 President's Budget Submission February 2015 Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Wide Justification Book Volume 5 of 5 Research,, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0601228D8Z / Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 1: Basic Research COST ($ in Millions)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED United States Special Operations Command Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #261
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 United States Special Operations Command Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 United States Special Operations Command DATE: April 2013 0400:, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base OCO ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Health Program Date: February 2015 0130: Defense Health Program / BA 2: RDT&E COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Complete Total
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 33142A: SATCOM Ground Environment FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0605080S / Defense Agency Initiatives (DAI) - Financial System
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Logistics Agency Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Defense Information Systems Agency DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Defense Information
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Health Program Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #9
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Health Program Date: March 2014 0130: Defense Health Program / BA 2: RDT&E COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 OCO # Total FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 22 R-1 Line #163
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Security Service Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #178
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Security Service Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #145
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 22 R-1 Line #59
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationJoint Interoperability Certification
Joint Interoperability Certification What the Program Manager Should Know Chris Watson (Note: This article is an updated version of Joint Interoperability Certification: What the Program Manager Should
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #200
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationPROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE. ($ in Millions) FY 2005 Estimate $6.994 FY 2004 Estimate $6.824 FY 2003 Estimate $7.612 FY 2002 Actual $5.
American Forces Information Service PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE Purpose and Scope ($ in Millions) FY 2005 Estimate $6.994 FY 2004 Estimate $6.824 FY 2003 Estimate $7.612 FY 2002 Actual $5.332 These funds
More informationDepartment of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates
Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Budget Estimates March 2014 Defense Security Service Defense Wide Justification Book Volume 5 of 5 Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide Defense
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #165
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 5.071 5.512 5.956-5.956 6.075 6.063 6.181
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #50
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400:,, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationHow To Improve The Defense Communications System
Briefing to the AFCEA International Cyber Symposium 26 June 2013 Lt Gen Ronnie D. Hawkins, Jr. Director, Defense Information Systems Agency 1 1 UNCLASSIFIED Organizational Changes Command Staff Financial
More informationGAO MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees March 2013 MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base PE 0603755D8Z: High Performance Computing OCO Total FY
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0101120F PE TITLE: ADVANCED CRUISE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 07 Operational System Development 0101120F ADVANCED CRUISE Cost ($ in Millions)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #62
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationPROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE. ($ in Millions) FY 2007 Estimate $6.765 FY 2006 Estimate $6.521 FY 2005 Estimate $6.796 FY 2004 Actual $6.
American Forces Information Service PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE ($ in Millions) FY 2007 Estimate $6.765 FY 2006 Estimate $6.52 FY 2005 Estimate $6.796 FY 2004 Actual $6.74 Purpose and Scope These funds provide
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 30 R-1 Line #241
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0603461A / High Performance Computing Modernization Program. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationDEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE WIDE Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Amended President's Budget
PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE WIDE Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Amended President's Budget EXHIBIT TITLE PAGE Purpose and Scope/Justification of Funds 2 P-1 Summary 6 P-1C Comparison Report 7 PB-1 Summary of FY 2002-2003
More informationFollowup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG 2015 008 OCTOBER 23, 2014 Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
More informationENTERPRISE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT. Creating connections THROUGH SERVICE & WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE
ITA Strategic Plan FY 2011 - FY 2016 U.S. Army Information Technology Agency REALIZING The DoD ENTERPRISE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT Creating connections THROUGH SERVICE & WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE Provide Quality
More informationDECC Montgomery. Mr. Chris Kemp Director May 2009
DECC Montgomery Mr. Chris Kemp Director May 2009 MISSION Provide information technology for the warfighter when, where, and how it is required and without interruption. VISION Achieve and sustain the most
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #145
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationDefense Contract Management Agency
Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates February 2010 Procurement, Defense-Wide Page Intentionally Blank PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE WIDE DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY EXHIBIT TITLE PAGE Purpose and Scope/Justification
More informationDefense Business Transformation Agency. February 2008
Defense Business Transformation Agency Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates February 2008 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide Exhibit R-1, RDT&E Programs Business Transformation
More informationStatus of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior Recommendations
Report No. DODIG-2013-111 I nspec tor Ge ne ral Department of Defense AUGUST 1, 2013 Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior s I N T
More informationMAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees March 2014 MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS Selected Defense Programs Need to Implement Key Acquisition Practices GAO-14-309
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 9.986 10.218 19.380-19.380 19.060 19.332 19.217 19.405 Continuing Continuing
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 6 - MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 0604258A - Target Systems Development COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY
More informationInformation Technology Processes FinCEN is an agency whose mission is dependent on the effective collection,
Appendix L Project Management and Information Technology Processes FinCEN is an agency whose mission is dependent on the effective collection, dissemination, and meaningful analysis of large quantities
More informationDEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS. Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees May 2014 DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process GAO-14-486 May
More informationCommon Operating Environment (COE) and Global Information Grid (GIG) Enterprise Services (GES) Mr. Rob Walker 24 September 2003
Common Operating Environment (COE) and Global Information Grid (GIG) Enterprise (GES) Mr. Rob Walker 24 September 2003 Common Operating Environment COE is mission-application independent - A basis for
More informationSelected Acquisition Report (SAR)
Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-537 NAS As of December 31, 2011 Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Program Information 3 Responsible
More informationForecast to Industry 2015
Forecast to Industry 2015 Networking Technologies Ms. Lisa Belt Deputy, Infrastructure Directorate 2 November 2015 87 Infrastructure Directorate IE1 Transport Division IE Infrastructure Directorate Email:
More informationDepartment of Veteran Affairs. Fred Catoe Office of Cyber and Information Security AAIP Project Manager March 2004
Department of Veteran Affairs Fred Catoe Office of Cyber and Information Security AAIP Project Manager March 2004 Background Smart Cards are a subset of a larger Authentication and Authorization Infrastructure
More informationDefense Contract Management Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Budget Estimates February 2011 Procurement, Defense-Wide PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE WIDE DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY EXHIBIT TITLE PAGE Purpose
More informationData Consolidation and Application Optimization (DCAO) Organization
Data Consolidation and Application Optimization (DCAO) Organization 11 February 2015 Presented to: DON CIO IT Conference San Diego Convention Center Mr. John Pope DCAO Director Space and Naval Warfare
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8440.01 December 24, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: DoD Information Technology (IT) Service Management (ITSM) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. Pursuant to the authority
More informationAcquisition. Army Claims Service Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (D-2002-109) June 19, 2002
June 19, 2002 Acquisition Army Claims Service Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (D-2002-109) Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General Quality Integrity Accountability Additional
More informationDLA Balanced Scorecard. Janet Foote Senior Strategic Planner 16 December 2004
DLA Balanced Scorecard Janet Foote Senior Strategic Planner 16 December 2004 Today s Session Defense Logistics Agency s Scorecard Defense Information Systems Agency s Scorecard Collaboration Benefits We
More informationService Oriented Architecture (SOA) for DoD
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) for DoD Prof. Paul A. Strassmann January 9, 2008 1 Part 1 SOA Requirements 2 The DoD Challenge 3 Most DoD Projects Have Own Data Projects 07 Budget $ Millions Number
More informationThe DoD CIO Charter:
George Mason University, Fairfax, VA The DoD CIO Charter: A Template for I.T. Governance? Paul A. Strassmann,October 3, 2005 1 Authority for the DoD CIO 2 Traditional Views of the CIO Roles 3 An Expansive
More informationAdvancing the U.S. Air Force Mission
Advancing the U.S. Air Force Mission IT Solutions, Professional & Technical Services Agile Support for Today s Operations, Reliable Innovation for Tomorrow s Missions An F-22 in Nevada returns to the
More informationDoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2016-038 DECEMBER 28, 2015 DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
More informationProgram Management Office Provided Adequate Oversight of Two Contracts Supporting the Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System
Report No. DODIG-2014-006 I nspec tor Ge ne ral U.S. Department of Defense OCTOBER 25, 2013 Program Management Office Provided Adequate Oversight of Two Contracts Supporting the Defense Enterprise Accounting
More informationAppendix. DoD SBIR Proposal Guidance. Background Research Guidance (and the Blackout Period ) F-2
Appendix DoD SBIR Proposal Guidance Background Research Guidance (and the Blackout Period ) F-2 Sample RDT&E Budget Item Justification (Navy PE 0604274N) F-7 DoD (Air Force) Phase I Proposal Format Guidelines
More informationHow To Implement Itil V3
2009 NMCI Conference: Implementing ITIL Session 1: ITSM Process ITSM COE Agenda Background ITSM Overview ITIL and Service Delivery Adopting ITIL to NGEN SE&I Activities 2 Background Develop Government
More informationWORKFORCE COMPOSITION CPR. Verification and Validation Summit 2010
WORKFORCE COMPOSITION CPR PEO IEW&S Organizational Assessment VCSA Brief Date 2010 October 13, 2010 This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO PREDECISIONAL LIMITED DISTRIBUTION AS OF: 11 Sep 2010 Verification
More informationAPAN Brief. Governance
APAN Brief Governance Table of Contents Roles and Relationships Significant Events Program Management Governance Overview Responsibilities Points of Contact Acronyms 2 Roles and Relationships OVERSIGHT
More informationWebsite: http://www.acq.osd.mil/ic/cwp.html Email: osd.coalition.warfare@mail.mil
Overview CWP provides funding on a competitive basis to DoD organizations to conduct cooperative research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) projects with foreign partners. The goals of the CWP
More informationbñåéêéí=ñêçã=íüé== mêçåééçáåöë= çñ=íüé= péåçåç=^ååì~ä=^åèìáëáíáçå= oéëé~êåü=póãéçëáìã=
NPS-PM-05-027 bñåéêéíñêçãíüé mêçåééçáåöë çñíüé péåçåç^ååì~ä^åèìáëáíáçå oéëé~êåüpóãéçëáìã THE NEW JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (JCIDS) AND ITS POTENTIAL IMPACTS UPON DEFENSE PROGRAM
More informationDoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2015-045 DECEMBER 4, 2014 DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
More informationODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA 22202-4704
Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, visit the Web site of the Department of Defense Inspector General at http://www.dodig.mil/audit/reports or contact the Secondary Reports Distribution
More informationDefense Healthcare Management Systems
Defense Healthcare Management Systems Recovering Warrior Task Force Interagency Program Office (IPO) Review Mr. Christopher Miller 28 January 2014 1 Agenda Topic Introduction Program Executive Office (PEO)
More informationDefense Enterprise Accounting and Management System DEAMS
DEAMS Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System DEAMS Modernizing Air Force Accounting and Finance Presented by: Ms. Patricia Hagin DFAS-IN/JJEAB DEAMS Functional Manager Overview DEAMS Historical
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8140.01 August 11, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Cyberspace Workforce Management References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This directive: a. Reissues and renumbers DoD Directive
More informationHow To Get A Production Line Of A Cloud Based System To Work For A Military
Global Combat Support System- Marine Corps (GCSS-MC) Program Overview and Status Andrew Dwyer, PM GCSS-MC 1 May 2012 Agenda Bottom Line Up Front GCSS-MC Program Overview Increment 1 Concept of Employment
More informationInformation Technology Management
May 18, 2006 Information Technology Management Acquisition of the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (D-2006-089) Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Quality Integrity
More informationGAO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DASHBOARD. Opportunities Exist to Improve Transparency and Oversight of Investment Risk at Select Agencies
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters October 2012 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DASHBOARD Opportunities Exist to Improve Transparency and Oversight of Investment
More informationDISA Acquisition Opportunities
DISA Acquisition Opportunities 2014 Forecast to Industry 1 CAE Acquisition Opportunities GCCS-J Program support Base year and one 1 year option with total estimated value of $5M Current PoP ends 28 Nov
More informationAF C2 Capability Modernization Leveraging Architectures to Achieve Warfighting Integration
Headquarters Air Combat Command AF C2 Capability Modernization Leveraging Architectures to Achieve Warfighting Integration This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Mr. John Vona, GS-15 AFC2IC/C2P Purpose Discuss
More informationDEFENSE LOGISTICS. Army Should Track Financial Benefits Realized from its Logistics Modernization Program. Report to Congressional Requesters
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters November 2013 DEFENSE LOGISTICS Army Should Track Financial Benefits Realized from its Logistics Modernization Program
More informationJoint Operational Medicine Information Systems Program
COL John R. Bailey, Deputy Program Manager 2015 Defense Health Information Technology Symposium Joint Operational Medicine Information Systems Program 1 DHA Vision A joint, integrated, premier system of
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Information Assurance (IA) in the Defense Acquisition System
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8580.1 July 9, 2004 SUBJECT: Information Assurance (IA) in the Defense Acquisition System ASD(NII) References: (a) Chapter 25 of title 40, United States Code (b)
More informationort Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE OF THE STANDARD ARMY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM-REHOST Report Number 99-165
it ort YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE OF THE STANDARD ARMY MAINTENANCE SYSTEM-REHOST Report Number 99-165 May 24, 1999 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Additional Copies To obtain additional
More informationEnterprise Projects Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Third Quarter Report
Enterprise Projects Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Third Quarter Report Enterprise Projects Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Third Quarter Report The Enterprise Program Investment Council (EPIC) is responsible for governance
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5000.01 May 12, 2003 Certified Current as of November 20, 2007 SUBJECT: The Defense Acquisition System USD(AT&L) References: (a) DoD Directive 5000.1, The Defense
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE 0603925N / Directed Energy and Electric Weapon System. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationSTATEMENT BY DAVID DEVRIES PRINCIPAL DEPUTY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER BEFORE THE
STATEMENT BY DAVID DEVRIES PRINCIPAL DEPUTY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER BEFORE THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE S INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE AND THE VETERANS
More informationPEO SYSCOM Conference Joint Pgm Management Perspective
Defense rmation Systems Agency A Combat Support Agency PEO SYSCOM Conference Joint Pgm Management Perspective Brigadier General Pete Hoene, USAF Program Executive Officer Command & Control Capabilities
More informationDefense Business Systems Investment Management Process Guidance. June 2012
Defense Business Systems Investment Management Process Guidance June 2012 Executive Summary Section 901 of the Fiscal Year 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (FY2012 NDAA), now codified at Title 10
More informationDepartment of Defense NetOps Strategic Vision
Department of Defense NetOps Strategic Vision December 2008 Department of Defense Chief Information Officer The Pentagon Washington, D.C. Table of Contents 1 Purpose...1 2 Introduction...1 2.1 NetOps
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5015.02 February 24, 2015 DoD CIO SUBJECT: DoD Records Management Program References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction reissues DoD Directive (DoDD)
More informationStatement. Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation. Before
Statement of Mr. Paul A. Brinkley Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Business Transformation Before THE UNITED STATES SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE (SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT)
More informationDefense Contract Management Agency (DCMA)
Fiscal Year 2011 Budget Estimates Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) February 2010 DCMA 87 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (This page intentionally left blank.) DCMA 88 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
More informationDEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY P. O. BOX 549 FORT MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-0549. Joint Interoperability Test Command (JTE) 7 Jan 15
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY P. O. BOX 549 FORT MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-0549 IN REPLY REFER TO: Joint Interoperability Test Command (JTE) 7 Jan 15 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Extension of
More informationEnterprise Resource Planning Systems Schedule Delays and Reengineering Weaknesses Increase Risks to DoD's Auditability Goals
Report No. DODIG-2012-111 July 13, 2012 Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Schedule Delays and Reengineering Weaknesses Increase Risks to DoD's Auditability Goals Additional Copies To obtain additional
More informationIncreasing Environmental Services Buying Power Through Strategic Sourcing - Continued
Power The operational Army has dedicated itself to transformation as a deliberate, strategic initiative to shed old concepts and processes so that we can successfully face an era of persistent conflict
More information