Is There a Kuznets Curve?


 Franklin Potter
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Is There a Kuznets Curve? John Luke Gallup Portland State University 1721 SW Broadway Cramer Hall, Suite 241 Portland OR tel: fax: September 25, 2012 Abstract No. There has never been good evidence for a pattern of rising inequality in lowincome countries and falling inequality in higher income countries. The only evidence that appears to support the Kuznets hypothesis is the crosssectional pattern of inequality levels across countries, although the Kuznets hypothesis is an assertion about the path of inequality within countries. Numerous crosssectional studies established the Kuznets curve as a stylized fact, dominating empirical and theoretical research on the effect of economic growth on income inequality since then. New international panel data with the first internally consistent time series for a large number of countries shows no evidence of a Kuznets curve. The data show an anti Kuznets curve: inequality decline in lowincome countries, and inequality increase in highincome countries. The Ushaped pattern shows up strongly in a nonparametric trend, in stochastic kernel estimation, but weakly in a quadratic fixed effect trend. JEL Codes: D31, O15, O47 Keywords: Income inequality, Kuznets curve, Inequality panel data
2 1 Introduction In late 1954, Simon Kuznets gave a bold Presidential Address to the American Economic Association (Kuznets, 1955). He chose a topic which had been largely unstudied due to lack of data, and used the scant data he had created himself or found elsewhere to propose a law of motion for the distribution of income. Kuznets had data for the change in income distribution in the United States, United Kingdom, and two states in Germany. The change he was confident of was a sharp decline in inequality in the U.S. and the U.K. after World War I. He also noted substantial income growth in the two countries during the same period. Kuznets combined his observations about the U.S. and the U.K. with the historical shift from agriculture to industry in the course of economic development to propose a typical pattern of change for income distribution. Kuznets assumed that rural agricultural incomes are lower and more equally distributed than urban industrial incomes. In that case, a shift into nascent industry will raise income inequality, as a rising fraction of workers earn higher industrial wages. Beyond a tipping point, the predominance of industrial employment will improve income distribution, as most workers earn similar industrial wages. This theory predicts an inverted Ushaped relationship between income levels and inequality. The international income distribution data necessary to evaluate Kuznets s hypothesis remained severely limited until the mid 1970s. By that time, at least one national income distribution observation was available for enough countries to look at the crosscountry relationship between income levels and inequality. The crosssectional data were consistent with the Kuznets hypothesis: middleincome countries, especially in Latin 1
3 America, tended to have higher levels of inequality than low or highincome countries. This lead to scores of empirical papers over the next forty years looking for an inverted Ushaped curve in crosscountry data with gradual improvements in country coverage and econometric technique. A partial list of studies includes Kravis (1960), Paukert (1973), Chenery and Syrquin (1975), Ahluwalia (1976a, 1976b), Saith (1983), Papanek and Kyn (1986), Campano and Salvatore (1988), Ram (1988), Tsakloglou (1988), Bourguignon and Morrison (1990), Anand and Kanbur (1993), Randolph and Lott (1993), Bourguignon (1994), Ogwang (1994), Fields and Jakubson (1995), Ram (1995), Jha (1996), Dawson (1997), Eusufzai (1997), Mbaku (1997), Chang and Ram (2000), Savvidesa and Stengos (2000), Lin and others (2006), and Huang and Lin (2007). The most careful of these studies, such as Anand and Kanbur (1993) and Fields and Jakubson (1995) did not find robust support for the Kuznets hypothesis, but most did. None of this research tested Kuznets hypothesis directly: that income inequality would increase and then decrease as income grew within countries. If other factors can influence the level of income distribution in each country, country characteristics rather than a Kuznets process might explain the crosssectional pattern. The shear repetition of crosssectional results gradually convinced people that the Kuznets curve was an empirical reality, to the point where theorists creating models with income distribution dynamics made sure they were able to replicate a Kuznets curve in their models. By the turn of the century, Kanbur (2000) felt that the dominance of the Kuznets hypothesis in income distribution research had become counterproductive: In fact, in a strange way the framework set out by the originators may have by now become a straightjacket which inhibits fresh thinking, as every new attempt to model development and distribution does so with at least half an 2
4 eye on whether or not the model can, in principle, generate an invertedu relationship between inequality and development, while most empirical work keeps returning to the question of whether or not there is an invertedu pattern to be discerned in the data. Crosscountry panel data did not become available until the 1990s. Deininger and Squire (1996, 1998) assembled the first largescale dataset with enough observations to study the typical path of inequality within countries. Deininger and Squire took the estimates of Gini coefficients from hundreds of separate studies of inequality in individual countries to construct a large number of time series. The two main conclusions of their research were that more countries have inequality paths inconsistent with the Kuznets hypothesis than consistent, and that most countries inequality changes slowly over time. Using the Deininger and Squire dataset, researchers have found no support for a Kuznets curve once they control for country fixed effects (Deininger and Squire, 1998, Higgins and Williamson, 1999, Savvidesa and Stengos, 2000, and Barro, 2000). Barro s influential paper (updated in Barro, 2008) did find support for the Kuznets curve, but that was due to regressions which do not include country fixed effects. That is, Barro was reproducing the usual crosssectional patterns. When Barro did include country fixed effects, the quadratic trend in income is insignificant, although the trend becomes statistically significant when he adds a number of additional explanatory variables 1. Even then, Barro acknowledges that income levels explain little of the trend in inequality. 1 One can see from a footnote (fn. 24 on p. 31) that the quadratic term in a simple fixed effects regression of the Gini coefficient on log GDP per capita is statistically insignificant. 3
5 Criticism of the accuracy of the inequality time series constructed by Deininger and Squire cast a shadow over research using the data set. The measured level of inequality depends sensitively on the definition of income or expenditure, unit of observation, survey coverage, etc. Combining inequality estimates to construct a time series from studies using different definitions and methods risks introducing spurious jumps due to changes of definition. Atkinson and Brandolini (2003) were skeptical of the accuracy of time series constructed by Deininger and Squire. They showed that for many Western European countries, Deininger and Squire's time series often departed significantly from a series Atkinson and Brandolini constructed using consistent definitions, causing the series to have serious inaccuracies both in the level of inequality and the trend over time. Western European data should presumably be among the most accurate. Atkinson and Brandolini conclude that we are not convinced that at present it is possible to use secondary datasets [like Deininger and Squire] safely without evaluating the accuracy of each series within it. Atkinson and Brandolini s critique effectively ended use of Deininger and Squire s panel data in published research due to doubt about the internal consistency of its time series. This paper uses a new panel of inequality data constructed with consistent definitions and data sources within each country over time. The data are used to estimate two kinds of nonparametric models of the relationship of inequality and income: a nonparametric fixed effects trend and a stochastic kernel model. The estimations show a clear Ushaped relationship rather than Kuznets invertedu relationship. Several earlier papers have used nonparametric methods to look for a Kuznets curve. Deininger and Squire (1998) in effect does this by counting countries with invertedu shaped inequality paths. However it not clear that this is a test for a general Kuznets curve if the invertedu trajectory occurs over different ranges of income in different 4
6 countries. Does this imply that countries would undergo multiple invertedu shaped trajectories as their income rises? Frazer (2006) uses nonparametric regression to test for a Kuznets curve using panel data from an update of the DeiningerSquire dataset. The nonparametric specification does not control for different levels of inequality in each country, however, so his results are still dominated by the crosssectional levels of inequality. Two other papers (Lin and others, 2006, and Huang and Lin, 2007) use semiparametric methods to test the Kuznets hypothesis, but by using crosssectional data, they are also not able to evaluate the typical trend of inequality within countries. The next section discusses the data in Kuznets original paper. Section 3 describes the new inequality data and quadratic trend lines. Section 4 presents a nonparametric fixed effects estimate of the Kuznets curve. Section 5 evaluates change in the distribution of inequality of a panel of countries using stochastic kernel estimation. Section 6 concludes. 2 Kuznets data Kuznets hypothesis about the relationship between inequality and economic growth in his 1955 address was based on timeseries data for just three countries and his intuition about the mechanisms of economic development. His conjecture was audacious given the data he had to work with. He acknowledged this, saying that his paper is perhaps 5 per cent empirical information and 95 per cent speculation, some of it possibly tainted by wishful thinking (Kuznets, 1955, p. 26). Kuznets used data he helped collect for the United States combined with data for the United Kingdom and two states in Germany. He also found point estimates of inequality in India, Puerto Rico, and Ceylon. Figure 1 presents the inequality data from Kuznets's original article combined with historical estimates of GDP per capita from 5
7 Maddison (2010) to show the patterns he was visualizing. It is striking that his data do not provide much support for his own hypothesis, except that United Kingdom and United States had substantial declines in their inequality before World War II. Kuznets discusses the likelihood that inequality worsened in both of these countries in the nineteenth century before his time series start, but he had no empirical evidence for it. Besides the U.S. and the U.K, the other countries for which he has inequality estimates do not indicate an invertedu curve. Kuznets presumption was that inequality is very low in agrarian societies before the advent of industrialization. Premodern inequality data are hard to come by, but Milanovic and others (2007) were able to reconstruct inequality data for eleven preindustrial societies ranging from the Roman Empire in AD14 to China in the 1880s. As shown in Figure 2, inequality in these agrarian societies was not particularly low. All but three of the estimates of inequality are higher than the median inequality in countries today (calculated from the data described in the next section). Half the preindustrial Gini coefficients are above the 75 th percentile of modern inequality estimates, including the estimates of inequality in England and Wales in the 17 th and 19 th centuries. The data do not suggest that one can assume low inequality in preindustrial societies. Feudalism didn t promote particularly equal distribution. Kuznets showed that inequality fell in two highincome countries as they grew richer after World War I, but he had no evidence of rising inequality at low income levels. Ironically, Kuznets prediction that inequality will rise during the early stages of development, for which he had no evidence, is better remembered than his prediction that inequality will fall at higher incomes. One reason that Kuznets's paper had a big impact was his model explaining the path of 6
8 inequality. In its simplest form, if agricultural workers all earn a low wage and industrial workers earn an identical higher wage, then the transition from agriculture to industry will create an invertedu curve in inequality. The movement of the first workers out of agriculture into higher wage industry will increase inequality, but beyond a certain point, inequality will fall as the majority of workers receive the constant industrial wage. A vulnerability of Kuznets s theory is that minor changes in the story change the prediction. For instance, if agricultural incomes are more unequal than industrial wages, perhaps due to unequal land ownership, movement out of agriculture into industry could reduce inequality right away. Furthermore, all kinds of other dynamics of economic development are likely to have implications for inequality besides the movement of labor out of agriculture into industry. International trade, the spread of education, and transportation linking previously isolated regions, to name just a few dynamics, are all likely to have major impacts on income distribution in ways that do not naturally suggest an invertedu shaped curve. Besides Kuznets scanty data and model of inequality change, what caused his hypothesis to so thoroughly capture the imagination of economists? The country crosssectional data. Figure 3 shows recent estimates of inequality for 156 countries. The Gini coefficients are the most recent observation for each country from the panel data set used in this paper for 87 countries augmented with the most recent Gini coefficients for 69 other countries from the World Development Indicators (World Bank, 2011). 2 GDP per capita 2 The region categories in Figure 3 and other figures are OECD90, Latin America, Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, Asia, and Africa. OECD90 indicates members of the Organization of Economic 7
9 estimates are from the Penn World Tables (Heston et al., 2010). This is the evidence, such as it is, that the Kuznets curve exists. A quadratic fit is significantly concave, although most of the curvature comes from the low inequality levels at high incomes rather than low inequality at low incomes. The curvature is also entirely dependent on using a logarithmic scale for income. Figure 4 shows that the Kuznets curve disappears when the quadratic fit is made using a unit GDP per capita scale rather than a logarithmic scale. The level of inequality in different countries relative to income does not necessarily tell us anything about the typical path of inequality within countries, which was the object of Kuznets hypothesis. Figure 5 shows that if countries differ in their level of inequality, inequality could follow a Ushaped trend within each country, but the quadratic fit across countries could be an invertedu curve. The level of inequality could differ across countries in a simple Kuznets model of inequality change if some countries have regional variation in incomes and others don t. If each region industrializes separately, the countries with regional income differences will have higher inequality (due to the interregional income differential) even if every region follows the trajectory of rising then falling inequality in the course of industrialization. Looking at withincountry inequality trends and allowing for different levels of inequality across countries requires panel data. The panel data assembled for this study is Cooperation and Development as of 1990, which includes the highest income countries of the world except for oil exporting countries. More recent OECD members Mexico, South Korea, Chile, Israel, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovenia are excluded from the OECD90 group, since most of these countries still have income levels substantially lower than OECD90 members. The excluded OECD members countries are included in the other regional groups. 8
10 described next. 3 Data and quadratic trends The lack of comparable data across countries has always plagued research on income inequality. Unlike most other basic national statistics, there is no international organization that collects standardized measures of income distribution worldwide. Good time series of inequality require data from a uniform household survey design over time because the scope of the questions about household income or household expenditure can have a big effect on the calculated dispersion of income or expenditure. Surveys should cover the whole countries' population and all sources of income and/or expenditure. Inconsistencies over time in the method used to estimate inequality levels also cause inaccuracies in the time series. Only very recently have consistently constructed timeseries of income distribution become available for a large number of countries. Four organizations have created series of inequality statistics from raw survey data spanning more than a decade for a large number of countries in certain regions of the world. The four organizations are Eurostat (2011) for European Union members, the TransMONEE database created by UNICEF for Eastern Europe and former Soviet Union countries (TransMONEE, 2011), SEDLAC (2011) at the Universidad Nacional de la Plata for Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Luxembourg Income Study database (LIS, 2011) for selected highincome countries. These four organizations provide statistics for all of Europe (East and West), Central Asia, Latin American, and several additional highincome countries. 9
11 Major parts of the world still do not have organizations which collect standardized income distribution statistics: East and South Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Of these, only the Asian regions have a large number of countries with the raw material for the statistics: household income and/or expenditure surveys spanning a substantial number of years. This study supplements the data from the four regional organizations above with statistics come from the UNUWIDER World Income Inequality Database (WIID 2011) and a few other sources. WIID, unlike the other organizations, compiles secondary data rather than generating statistics directly from household survey microdata. WIID is a continuation of the work of Deininger and Squire (1996, 1998) to collect inequality series from national statistical agencies or academic studies. Unlike the original Deininger and Squire data, however, this study does not patch together data from disparate studies into a time series. Crucially, the data in this study only includes country series which are internally consistent over time in terms of the source household survey and the method used to calculate the inequality statistics. The country times series used in this study hew to the following criteria: 1) They are calculated from surveys of household income (covering all income sources) or household consumption expenditure drawn from a national sample of all households. 2) The time series are calculated from surveys with the same survey design each year. 3 3) The time series of inequality statistics are calculated using the same method and definitions within each country. 3 Minor changes of survey questions and survey design still occur over time in many of the standard national surveys, but statisticians usually address these inconsistencies when they calculate a time series of inequality estimates. 10
12 Criteria 2 and 3 are particularly important for ensuring an accurate measurement of the change of inequality over time. Failure to meet these criteria is what caused inaccuracies in Deininger and Squire's inequality series. These data cover a later period than the data in Deininger and Squire. Most of the data from Eurostat, TransMONEE, and SEDLAC are derived from national surveys established in the 1990s which were not available when Deininger and Squire compiled their data. Even most Western European countries did not have annual household income surveys before the establishment of a Europeanwide survey in For the most part, lowincome countries measure inequality using household consumption, and highincome (and Latin American) countries measure inequality using household income. Different countries use different weighting methods for household members. Some use income per adult equivalent, some use income per capita, and a few use total household income. These differences can affect the level of inequality across countries, but that won t be an issue in this study due to controls for countryspecific inequality levels. 4 The data include time series from 87 countries, split regionally so that about a quarter of the countries come each from the OECD90 2, Latin America, Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, and Asia and Africa combined. Asia and especially Africa are underrepresented. The data for Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union before 1994 are excluded to avoid picking up the sudden inequality changes after the collapse of central planning. 4 See more details about the definitions of inequality in each country in Gallup (2012). It was this kind of inconsistent definitions within countries which caused the Deininger and Squire data not to have reliable time series. 11
13 Gini coefficients are paired with income levels for each country and year. Income levels are measured by gross domestic product (GDP) per capita from the Penn World Tables version 7.0 (Heston and others, 2011). The GDP per capita figures are adjusted for purchasing power parity and reported in 2005 constant international dollars. The inequality time series for 87 countries are graphed in Figure 6. One can see the invertedu shape of inequality levels similar to the cross section graph in Figure 3. However, if we control for inequality level differences in each country with a quadratic fixed effects estimator, there is a slight U shape to the fit, although not statistically significant, as shown in Table 1. There is no sign of the inverted U of the Kuznets hypothesis in the typical withincountry trend. Table 1: Fixed Effect Inequality Trend Gini coefficient ln(gdp per capita) (0.62) ln(gdp per capita) (0.68) Constant (2.93)** R N 852 * p<0.05; ** p<0.01 In the crosssection, the appearance of an apparent Kuznets curve depends on whether or not GDP per capita is transformed in logarithms. This suggests that testing for a 12
14 Kuznets curve may depend sensitively on the functional form used. The next section looks at the relationship of inequality to income level without parametric assumptions about the trend. 4 Nonparametric trend Kuznets hypothesis is about the change in inequality as income grows, not about the level of inequality. Inequality increases at a decreasing rate up to a middle income level and then decreases at an increasing rate. This relationship can be expressed as dg dy = f (y) where f (y) 0 for y y m and f (y) < 0 for y > y m. The slope of the trend of inequality, dg dy, increases up to a middle income, y m, and then decreases. The commonly used quadratic trend line takes f (y) = β 1 + β 2 y which implies that g = β 0 + β 1 y + β 2 y 2 for some β 0, which could be country specific. The Kuznets hypothesis is that β 1 > 0 and β 2 < 0. With nonparametric methods, it is not necessary to specify the functional form of f (y) ; the shape of f can be inferred from the data. Using m dg dy for the slope of the inequality trend, we can use nonparametric smoothing to fit the equation m it = f (y it ) + ε it (1) to data where ε it is a random error, i is the country indicator, and t is the time indicator. m it = g it g i,t 1 y it y i,t 1. Equation 1 is independent of the initial level of inequality in each country, so it can be used to estimate the typical trend in inequality across countries. 13
15 f ( ) is estimated by kernelweighted local polynomial smoothing (Stata, 2011, p ). This method takes a weighted polynomial regression of neighboring values to predict the level ˆf (y it ) for each level of income, where y it is the natural log of GDP per capita. This method fails due to the large influence of a small number of outliers. In some countries, GDP is virtually unchanged over the period of two inequality surveys. Due to sampling variation, the inequality estimates are different in the two periods, causing the estimate of the slope to explode: for g it g i,t 1 > 0 as y it y i,t 1 0, m it. A solution is to smooth each country s inequality trend separately beforehand, and calculate m it from the smoothed values. Since the ultimate purpose is to find the average smoothed trend in inequality, smoothing each country s trend first doesn t introduce any bias, but it does eliminate the large outliers due to sampling error. Figure 7 shows the smoothed trend in the inequality slope for different income levels. The dotted lines are the 95% confidence bounds. The results are the opposite of the Kuznets hypothesis. At low income levels, inequality falls with income, and at higher income levels, inequality rises with income. The preferred specification shown in the figure is a linear smooth (polynomial of degree 1) using an Epanechnikov kernel with a bandwidth determined by the ROT algorithm of Under certain assumptions, the ROT bandwidth is optimal (Fan and Gijbels, 1996). The smooth in Figure 7 turned out not to be sensitive to variations in bandwidth, kernel choice, or degree of polynomial. The bandwidth was varied from
16 to 10, with virtually no effect on the smooth. Gaussian, triangle, and rectangle kernels all produced qualitatively similar trends, although the rectangular kernel causes the point of inflection where the slope crosses the axis to occur at a lower income level. A polynomial of degree 0 (local mean smoothing) flattens the trend somewhat, and polynomials of degree 2 and 3 increase the confidence interval somewhat, but the upward trend remains the same. In each case, the parameters are used for presmoothing each of the individual country series are varied along with the final smooth. To help visualize the results, we can construct a curve in inequality levels from the estimated slope function. Given an estimated slope ˆm it = ˆf (y it ), the inequality level can be calculated recursively: ĝ it = ĝ i,t 1 + ˆm it (y it y i,t 1 ). The level of g i0 is fixed so that the average level of the curve is equal to the average inequality in the sample. Figure 8 shows the trend line of inequality superimposed on the smoothed country trends. The confidence bounds were calculated by bootstrapping. Like the estimated slope curve, the shape and precision of the level curve is not very sensitive to the choice of bandwidth, kernel, and degree of polynomial. The nonparametric trend in inequality in Figure 8 shows a strong downward trend in inequality up to relatively high income levels, where the trend becomes upward sloping. The nonparametric trend of inequality is clearly Ushaped, not invertedu shaped. The trend in Figure 8 is consistent with Kuznets data, such as it was, but it is also consistent with very long historical series that have recently been compiled for top income shares for almost two dozen countries over the course of the twentieth century. Almost all of 22 countries discussed in the survey by Atkinson, Picketty, and Saez (2011) have graphs of the share of income going to the richest 1% over the last hundred years which have remarkably similar shape to the graph in Figure 8, although some 15
17 middle European countries and Japan show no sign of the upturn at the end. 5 Stochastic Kernel Estimation The previous sections used quadratic and nonparametric trends in inequality (controlling for country fixed effects) to evaluate the change in average crosscountry inequality as income grows. A fuller assessment would consider the evolution of the whole distribution of country inequalities as income rises, rather than just the trend. A single trend, for instance, could mask a dynamic where some kinds of countries tend towards one level of inequality and other countries tend towards a different level of inequality. The data show a lot of diversity within countries in the path of inequality, with some countries distribution becoming more equal and others less equal whether they start out with high or low inequality. Stochastic kernel estimation is flexible enough to model the net outcome of complex dynamics of inequality change. It can incorporate a dynamic path where all countries tend towards a single level of inequality or where they tend towards two or more different levels of inequality. It can also incorporate a dynamic path where countries switch places between different levels of inequality, while the overall distribution of crossnational inequalities remains the same. Stochastic process models are typically applied to processes that evolve over time. However, most hypotheses about income distribution concern the path of inequality as income grows, not as time passes. For this reason, we model the crosscountry distribution of inequalities in the income domain rather than in the time domain. 16
18 The stochastic kernel model represents the evolution of continuous distributions from period to period. It is the continuous analogue of a Markov chain, which represents the evolution of discrete distributions. Quah (1997, 2007) explains stochastic kernel models and applies them to the distribution of income levels across countries. Since stochastic kernel models use continuous distribution functions, Quah defines them using measure theory instead of the more accessible matrix algebra of Markov chains. Continuous income distributions are attractive conceptually, but in practice, stochastic kernel models are estimated by discrete approximation. Digital computers must approximate continuous transition surfaces with discrete grids, so a stochastic kernel model is actually estimated as a finegrained Markov chain. Since the model is ultimately estimated using a discretized distribution, we will present stochastic kernel estimation using the simpler Markov chain notation. There is no loss of generality since a continuous distribution can be arbitrarily well approximated by a high dimension discrete distribution. Refer to Quah (1997, 2007) for the continuous formulation. The usual difference in practice between the stochastic kernel and Markov chain estimation is the method of calculating the transition matrix. Markov transition matrices are typically estimated from crude frequency counts of transitions. Stochastic kernel estimation, in contrast, typically uses bivariate kernel density estimation. 5 5 Although stochastic kernel estimation and kernel density estimation both include the term kernel, meaning distribution function, they are referring to different uses of a distribution function. Stochastic kernel estimation refers to the estimation of the transition from one period's distribution to the next period's distribution of the variable of interest (here, inequality). Kernel density estimation refers to the weighting scheme for averaging neighboring frequency observations. The weights decline moving away from the cell of interest according to the value of the kernel, or distribution function, chosen (e.g. Gaussian, Epanechnikov, triangle, etc.) 17
19 The stochastic kernel estimation of the transition matrix can be finergrained with more rows and columns because the kernel density estimation uses information from neighboring cell frequencies to smooth the density estimates. Whereas a typical Markov transition matrix of frequencies from a sample of several hundred observations might be a 5x5 matrix to avoid small sample sizes in each transition cell, a bivariate kernel density estimator would commonly produce a 50x50 matrix smoothly approximating the surface. So in practice a stochastic kernel estimation is a Markov chain estimation with a smoothed transition matrix. The Markov chain in this application models the evolution of the distribution of country inequalities with transitions from one income level to another, rather than the more conventional transition from one time period to another. First divide inequality into N possible levels, with values g 1,,g N. The set G = {g 1,,g N } is the state space, and countries move from one inequality level, g i, to another, g j, at each step of income. A fundamental assumption of the Markov model is the Markov property. Let X s G be the inequality level of a country at income level s. The Markov property is that assumption that E( X s+1 X 0,, X s ) = E( X s+1 X s ). That is, the inequality level at the next higher income level depends only on the inequality level at the current income level, and not on the earlier history of inequality levels at lower income levels. In addition, we assume homogeneity of transitions across income levels: E( X s+1 X s ) = E( X s X s 1 ) for all s. Then we can define the transition probability as p ij = E( X s+1 = g i X s = g j ). The N by N matrix of all the transition probabilities is P = p ij. Let u s be an Ndimensional probability row vector which represents the state of the Markov chain at income level s. The i th component of u s represents the probability 18
20 that the chain is at inequality level g i. Then u s+1 = u s P. If we assume that for every inequality level g i except for g 1 there is a positive probability of inequality falling to g i 1 at the next income level, and at every inequality level g i except for g N there is a positive probability of inequality rising to g i+1 at the next income level, these are sufficient conditions for the Markov chain to be ergodic, which means there is a possibility of going from every inequality state to every other inequality state, although not necessarily in one step. By Doeblin's Theorem (Stroock, 2000, p. 28), ergodic Markov chains tend towards a unique stationary probability vector as income levels increase without bound. The stationary probability vector w is defined by w = lim u 0 P s. w shows us where the distribution of inequalities will end up if the s current distributional dynamic continues indefinitely. The stationary distribution w is equal to the first left eigenvector of the transition matrix P, and is independent of the initial distribution u 0 (Theorem 8.6, p. 106, Billingsley, 1979). This Markov model allows for a broad range of inequality dynamics including churning between inequality levels. However, it does rule out a Kuznets curve, the tendency for inequality to rise at low income levels and then switches to moving towards lower inequality beyond a certain income threshold income. The assumption of homogeneity, E( X s+1 X s ) = E( X s X s 1 ), means that if inequality tends to rise with income, it does so at all income levels. To allow for a Kuznets curve dynamic where inequality increases at low income levels but falls at high income levels, separate Markov processes are estimated for observations below middle income and for those above middle income. The Kuznets hypothesis predicts convergence towards higher inequality levels in the lowincome sample and convergence towards lower inequality in the highincome sample. 19
THE EFFECT OF ECONOMIC GROWTH ON POVERTY IN EASTERN EUROPE
ZARZĄDZANIE PUBLICZNE 1 2(9 10)/2010 Zeszyty Naukowe Instytutu Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Institute of World and Regional Economics, University of Miskolc THE EFFECT OF ECONOMIC GROWTH
More informationA New Dataset of Labour Market Reform/Rigidity Indexes for Up to 145 Countries since 1960: LAMRIG
A New Dataset of Labour Market Reform/Rigidity Indexes for Up to 145 Countries since 1960: LAMRIG Nauro F Campos Jeffrey B Nugent Brunel University, University of Southern California CEPR, KOF and IZA
More informationGhana South Korea United States. Real GDP per capita (2005 dollars) Per centage of 1960 real GDP per capita. 2009 real GDP per capita
LongRun Economic Growth chapter: 24 9 ECONOMICS MACROECONOMICS 1. The accompanying table shows data from the Penn World Table, Version 7.0, for real GDP in 2005 U.S. dollars for Argentina, Ghana, South
More informationComparing Levels of Development
2 Comparing Levels of Development Countries are unequally endowed with natural capital. For example, some benefit from fertile agricultural soils, while others have to put a lot of effort into artificial
More informationExecutive summary. Global Wage Report 2014 / 15 Wages and income inequality
Executive summary Global Wage Report 2014 / 15 Wages and income inequality Global Wage Report 2014/15 Wages and income inequality Executive summary INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE GENEVA Copyright International
More informationIncome inequality: Trends and Measures
Key Points Income inequality: Trends and Measures UK income inequality increased by 32% between 1960 and 2005. During the same period, it increased by 23% in the USA, and in Sweden decreased by 12%. In
More informationEconomic Growth Rates
4 Economic Growth Rates Will the poor countries catch up with the rich? GDP and GNP growth rates in developing countries are on average higher than those in developed countries. Moreover, the difference
More informationMATH BOOK OF PROBLEMS SERIES. New from Pearson Custom Publishing!
MATH BOOK OF PROBLEMS SERIES New from Pearson Custom Publishing! The Math Book of Problems Series is a database of math problems for the following courses: Prealgebra Algebra Precalculus Calculus Statistics
More informationChapter 14 How Economies Grow and Develop Macroeconomics In Context (Goodwin, et al.)
Chapter 14 How Economies Grow and Develop Macroeconomics In Context (Goodwin, et al.) Chapter Overview This chapter discusses theories of economic growth, highlighting the Solow growth model and the importance
More informationThe Effect of Mergers & Acquisitions and Greenfield FDI on Income Inequality
Zhuang and Griffith, International Journal of Applied Economics, March 2013, 10(1), 2938 29 The Effect of Mergers & Acquisitions and Greenfield FDI on Income Inequality Hong Zhuang* and David Griffith*
More informationFUNCTIONAL EXPLORATORY DATA ANALYSIS OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FOR VARIOUS COUNTRIES
QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN ECONOMICS Vol. XIV, No. 1, 2013, pp. 180 189 FUNCTIONAL EXPLORATORY DATA ANALYSIS OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FOR VARIOUS COUNTRIES Stanisław Jaworski Department of Econometrics and Statistics
More informationKILM 16. Labour productivity
KILM 16. Labour productivity Introduction This chapter presents information on labour productivity for the aggregate economy with labour productivity defined as output per unit of labour input (persons
More informationrelating to household s disposable income. A Gini Coefficient of zero indicates
Gini Coefficient The Gini Coefficient is a measure of income inequality which is based on data relating to household s disposable income. A Gini Coefficient of zero indicates perfect income equality, whereas
More informationQuantitative significance of growth Inequality and poverty. Sources of growth Global imbalance Tensions and risks
The Role of Growth in Development by Danny Quah Economics Department, LSE Wednesday 13 February 28 Overseas Development Institute, London Conclusions Quantitative significance of growth Inequality and
More informationIs Economic Growth Good for the Poor?
Is Economic Growth Good for the Poor? Tracking Low Incomes Using General Means by James E. Foster and Miguel Székely Department of Economics Vanderbilt University Research Department InterAmerican Development
More informationEU10 AND THE CAP CONTENTS
Agricultural Policy Perspectives Brief April 2014 EU10 AND THE CAP 10 YEARS OF SUCCESS Thinkstockphotos.com CONTENTS 1. Structural Adjustment 2. Income 3. CAP expenditure 4. Land Tenure 5. Prices and
More informationNEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS
NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS TEST DESIGN AND FRAMEWORK September 2014 Authorized for Distribution by the New York State Education Department This test design and framework document
More informationGlobal Demographic Trends and their Implications for Employment
Global Demographic Trends and their Implications for Employment BACKGROUND RESEARCH PAPER David Lam and Murray Leibbrandt Submitted to the High Level Panel on the Post2015 Development Agenda This paper
More informationStatement by Dean Baker, CoDirector of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (www.cepr.net)
Statement by Dean Baker, CoDirector of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (www.cepr.net) Before the U.S.China Economic and Security Review Commission, hearing on China and the Future of Globalization.
More informationPoverty and income growth: Measuring propoor growth in the case of Romania
Poverty and income growth: Measuring propoor growth in the case of EVA MILITARU, CRISTINA STROE Social Indicators and Standard of Living Department National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and
More informationSocial Security Eligibility and the Labor Supply of Elderly Immigrants. George J. Borjas Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research
Social Security Eligibility and the Labor Supply of Elderly Immigrants George J. Borjas Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research Updated for the 9th Annual Joint Conference of the Retirement
More informationNERI Quarterly Economic Facts Summer 2012. 4 Distribution of Income and Wealth
4 Distribution of Income and Wealth 53 54 Indicator 4.1 Income per capita in the EU Indicator defined National income (GDP) in per capita (per head of population) terms expressed in Euro and adjusted for
More informationChild Poverty in High and MiddleIncome Countries: Selected Findings from LIS 1
April 2012 Child Poverty in High and MiddleIncome Countries: Selected Findings from LIS 1 What is LIS? Janet C. Gornick, Director, LIS Professor of Political Science and Sociology, Graduate Center City
More informationEducation and Wage Differential by Race: Convergence or Divergence? *
Education and Wage Differential by Race: Convergence or Divergence? * Tian Luo Thesis Advisor: Professor Andrea Weber University of California, Berkeley Department of Economics April 2009 Abstract This
More informationThe Emerging Middle Class in Developing Countries. Homi Kharas, Brookings Institution June XX, 2011
The Emerging Middle Class in Developing Countries Homi Kharas, Brookings Institution June XX, 2011 1 Introduction Middle class consumers in the US and other G7 powers have been a key source of demand in
More informationFairfield Public Schools
Mathematics Fairfield Public Schools AP Statistics AP Statistics BOE Approved 04/08/2014 1 AP STATISTICS Critical Areas of Focus AP Statistics is a rigorous course that offers advanced students an opportunity
More informationInteraction of global and national income inequalities. Branko Milanovic and John E. Roemer 1
May 10, 2016 Interaction of global and national income inequalities by Branko Milanovic and John E. Roemer 1 1. Introduction Global inequality, defined as income inequality among all citizens of the world,
More informationIdentifying Nonlinearities In Fixed Effects Models
Identifying Nonlinearities In Fixed Effects Models Craig T. McIntosh and Wolfram Schlenker October 2006 Abstract We discuss the use of quadratic terms in models which include fixed effects or dummy variables.
More informationwww.pwc.co.uk/economics Global wage projections to 2030 September 2013
www.pwc.co.uk/economics Global wage projections to 2030 Summary: Wage gap between emerging and advanced economies will shrink significantly by 2030 By 2030, our projections in this report suggest that
More informationData Preparation and Statistical Displays
Reservoir Modeling with GSLIB Data Preparation and Statistical Displays Data Cleaning / Quality Control Statistics as Parameters for Random Function Models Univariate Statistics Histograms and Probability
More informationWhat do we know about income inequality in NZ? (Bryan Perry, MSD) Income inequality: summary indicators
84 What do we know about income inequality in NZ? (Bryan Perry, MSD) Extracts from the 2013 Household Incomes Report, 16 July 2013 Income inequality: summary indicators Income inequality is about how dispersed
More informationChapter 1. The Development Gap
Chapter 1 The Development Gap STORIES OF CATCHUP AND DECLINE The development gap emerged because some countries developed earlier than others. In historical perspective the Industrial Revolution : The
More informationGlobalization and International Trade
12 Globalization and International Trade Globalization refers to the growing interdependence of countries resulting from the increasing integration of trade, finance, people, and ideas in one global marketplace.
More informationECONOMICS INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER DISCIPLINES Vol. I  Costs of Health Care Throughout the World  R.E. Santerre
COSTS OF HEALTH CARE THROUGHOUT THE WORLD R.E. Center for Health Care and Insurance Studies, Department of Finance, University of Connecticut, USA Keywords: health care costs, supply and demand of health
More informationA Short review of steel demand forecasting methods
A Short review of steel demand forecasting methods Fujio John M. Tanaka This paper undertakes the present and past review of steel demand forecasting to study what methods should be used in any future
More informationOnly by high growth rates sustained for long periods of time.
Chapter 1 IntroductionandGrowthFacts 1.1 Introduction In 2000, GDP per capita in the United States was $32500 (valued at 1995 $ prices). This high income level reflects a high standard of living. In contrast,
More informationEconomic Growth Rate The World Bank
Economic Growth Rate The World Bank GDP growth rates in developing countries are on average higher than those in developed countries. Over the 196599 period, the average annual growth rate was 4.1 percent
More information4 Distribution of Income, Earnings and Wealth
4 Distribution of Income, Earnings and Wealth Indicator 4.1 Indicator 4.2a Indicator 4.2b Indicator 4.3a Indicator 4.3b Indicator 4.4 Indicator 4.5a Indicator 4.5b Indicator 4.6 Indicator 4.7 Income per
More informationJudicial performance and its determinants: a crosscountry perspective
No. 05 JUNE 2013 Judicial performance and its determinants: a crosscountry perspective A GOING FOR GROWTH REPORT Box 1. Description of the data The data used in this study come primarily from three
More informationConsumer Credit Worldwide at year end 2012
Consumer Credit Worldwide at year end 2012 Introduction For the fifth consecutive year, Crédit Agricole Consumer Finance has published the Consumer Credit Overview, its yearly report on the international
More informationEconomic Development and the Gender Wage Gap Sherri Haas
Economic Development and the Gender Wage Gap I. INTRODUCTION General wage inequality within countries is a topic that has received a great deal of attention in the economic literature. Differences in wages
More informationThe Elasticity of Taxable Income: A NonTechnical Summary
The Elasticity of Taxable Income: A NonTechnical Summary John Creedy The University of Melbourne Abstract This paper provides a nontechnical summary of the concept of the elasticity of taxable income,
More informationInequality, Mobility and Income Distribution Comparisons
Fiscal Studies (1997) vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 93 30 Inequality, Mobility and Income Distribution Comparisons JOHN CREEDY * Abstract his paper examines the relationship between the crosssectional and lifetime
More informationSelfSelection and the Economics of Immigration. George J. Borjas Harvard University June 2010
SelfSelection and the Economics of Immigration George J. Borjas Harvard University June 2010 1. Sjaastad on migration (1962) Migration poses two broad and distinct questions for the economist. The first,
More informationMissing the Story. David Rosnick and Dean Baker. The OECD s Analysis of Inequality. July 2012
Missing the Story The OECD s Analysis of Inequality David Rosnick and Dean Baker July 2012 Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20009 2022935380
More informationAssignment 2: Exploratory Data Analysis: Applying Visualization Tools
: Exploratory Data Analysis: Applying Visualization Tools Introduction Economic boom, though inspiring, is always connected with unsustainable development. Because of this, people tend to view economic
More informationSouth Carolina College and CareerReady (SCCCR) Probability and Statistics
South Carolina College and CareerReady (SCCCR) Probability and Statistics South Carolina College and CareerReady Mathematical Process Standards The South Carolina College and CareerReady (SCCCR)
More informationEconomic Growth Rates
BEG_i144.qxd 6/10/04 1:46 PM Page 23 4 Economic Growth Rates GDP growth rates in developing countries are on average higher than those in developed countries. Over the 196599 period, the average annual
More informationArticle: Main results from the Wealth and Assets Survey: July 2012 to June 2014
Article: Main results from the Wealth and Assets Survey: July 2012 to June 2014 Coverage: GB Date: 18 December 2015 Geographical Area: Region Theme: Economy Main points In July 2012 to June 2014: aggregate
More information1. Current Price GDP & GDP Deflator. Series scope and limitations
Australian Current GDP, GDP deflator, CPI, Population and Share Price Index: Data Sources and Methods By Diane Hutchinson Senior Lecturer School of Economics Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University
More informationGlobalization and China: Impact on the Economy and People s Quality of Life
Globalization and China: Impact on the Economy and People s Quality of Life Tao (Tony) Gao, Ph. D. Zarb School of Business Hofstra University University 1 APEC Economic Leaders' Declaration Shanghai, China;
More informationLABOUR PRODUCTIVITY AND UNIT LABOUR COST Economic development Employment Core indicator
LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY AND UNIT LABOUR COST Economic development Employment Core indicator 1. INDICATOR (a) Name: Labour productivity and unit labour costs. (b) Brief Definition: Labour productivity is defined
More informationChapter 1 Introduction, page 1 of 7
Chapter 1 Introduction, page 1 of 7 the distinction between economic growth and economic development: economic growth takes place when there is a sustained (ongoing for at least 12 years) increase in
More informationNational Money as a Barrier to International Trade: The Real Case for Currency Union Andrew K. Rose and Eric van Wincoop*
National Money as a Barrier to International Trade: The Real Case for Currency Union Andrew K. Rose and Eric van Wincoop* Revised: December 18, 2000. Comments Welcome Andrew K. Rose Eric van Wincoop Haas
More informationChapter 6 Economic Growth
Chapter 6 Economic Growth 1 The Basics of Economic Growth 1) The best definition for economic growth is A) a sustained expansion of production possibilities measured as the increase in real GDP over a
More informationDemographics of Atlanta, Georgia:
Demographics of Atlanta, Georgia: A Visual Analysis of the 2000 and 2010 Census Data 36315 Final Project Rachel Cohen, Kathryn McKeough, Minnar Xie & David Zimmerman Ethnicities of Atlanta Figure 1: From
More informationReligious Demography of Emerging Economies
Religious Demography of Emerging Economies Age structures and fertility in the BRIC countries and the global religious consequences of their economic growth M. Stonawski 1, V. Skirbekk 2, M. Potančoková
More informationChapter 6. Inequality Measures
Chapter 6. Inequality Measures Summary Inequality is a broader concept than poverty in that it is defined over the entire population, and does not only focus on the poor. The simplest measurement of inequality
More informationProblem Set #4 Answers Date Due: October 25, 2012
Problem Set #4 Answers Date Due: October 5, 01 1. The World Bank data library www.worldbank.org reports the following information on the distribution of income for Mexico in 008. Table 1: Mexico Distribution
More informationGains from Trade? The Net Effect of the TransPacific Partnership Agreement on U.S. Wages
September 2013 Gains from Trade? The Net Effect of the TransPacific Partnership Agreement on U.S. Wages By David Rosnick* Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 400 Washington,
More informationCapital Accumulation and Economic Growth
C H A P T E R 5 Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth Overview In this chapter we examine the relationship between increases in the capital stock and economic growth. We first discuss whether an economy
More informationInsurance Market Outlook
Munich Re Economic Research May 2014 Premium growth is again slowly gathering momentum After a rather restrained 2013 (according to partly preliminary data), we expect growth in global primary insurance
More informationBusiness Statistics. Successful completion of Introductory and/or Intermediate Algebra courses is recommended before taking Business Statistics.
Business Course Text Bowerman, Bruce L., Richard T. O'Connell, J. B. Orris, and Dawn C. Porter. Essentials of Business, 2nd edition, McGrawHill/Irwin, 2008, ISBN: 9780073319889. Required Computing
More informationAverage Federal Income Tax Rates for MedianIncome FourPerson Families
820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 2024081080 Fax: 2024081056 center@cbpp.org http://www.cbpp.org April 10, 2002 OVERALL FEDERAL TAX BURDEN ON MOST FAMILIES INCLUDING MIDDLE
More informationIndicators of Globalization and Poverty. Overview
Indicators of Globalization and Poverty Overview Questions for Globalization What is economic globalization? Factors deriving globalization? How do we measure globalization? What is economic globalization?
More informationWeek 1. Exploratory Data Analysis
Week 1 Exploratory Data Analysis Practicalities This course ST903 has students from both the MSc in Financial Mathematics and the MSc in Statistics. Two lectures and one seminar/tutorial per week. Exam
More informationTrends in Growth and Poverty in Asia: An Economic Background Paper for ASREP
Trends in Growth and Poverty in Asia: An Economic Background Paper for ASREP Executive Summary, January 2003 This study examines growth and poverty reduction in the six economies that are most significant
More informationThomas Malthus Economist in the late 1700searly 1800s felt Europeans will not be able to eat if population increased
European Population doubled (18501914) Thomas Malthus Economist in the late 1700searly 1800s felt Europeans will not be able to eat if population increased After World War II, Europeans and other industrial
More informationDifference in differences and Regression Discontinuity Design
Difference in differences and Regression Discontinuity Design Majeure Economie September 2011 1 Difference in differences Intuition Identification of a causal effect Discussion of the assumption Examples
More informationGrowth, Inequality, and Social Welfare: CrossCountry Evidence
Growth, Inequality, and Social Welfare: CrossCountry Evidence David Dollar (Brookings) Tatjana Kleineberg (Yale) Aart Kraay (World Bank) April 2014 Abstract: We use social welfare functions that assign
More informationPoverty and Social Exclusion in Central, Eastern and SouthEastern European Member States. Michael Knogler
Department of Economics Policy Issues No. May 1 Institut für Ost und Südosteuropaforschung Landshuter Straße, D937 Regensburg Telefon: ++9 (9 1) 93 51 EMail: info@iosregensburg.de Internet: www.iosregensburg.de
More informationThe Decline of the U.S. Labor Share. by Michael Elsby (University of Edinburgh), Bart Hobijn (FRB SF), and Aysegul Sahin (FRB NY)
The Decline of the U.S. Labor Share by Michael Elsby (University of Edinburgh), Bart Hobijn (FRB SF), and Aysegul Sahin (FRB NY) Comments by: Brent Neiman University of Chicago Prepared for: Brookings
More informationWhy HighOrder Polynomials Should Not be Used in Regression Discontinuity Designs
Why HighOrder Polynomials Should Not be Used in Regression Discontinuity Designs Andrew Gelman Guido Imbens 2 Aug 2014 Abstract It is common in regression discontinuity analysis to control for high order
More informationPublic and Private Sector Earnings  March 2014
Public and Private Sector Earnings  March 2014 Coverage: UK Date: 10 March 2014 Geographical Area: Region Theme: Labour Market Theme: Government Key Points Average pay levels vary between the public and
More informationEconomic Change in India
Adam Cagliarini and Mark Baker* India has become an increasingly important part of the global economic landscape over the past decade. Its economy has become more open to international trade, its workforce
More informationCurrency Unions and Irish External Trade. Christine Dwane Trinity College Dublin. Philip R. Lane, IIIS, Trinity College Dublin & CEPR
Institute for International Integration Studies IIIS Discussion Paper No.189 / November 2006 Currency Unions and Irish External Trade Christine Dwane Trinity College Dublin Philip R. Lane, IIIS, Trinity
More informationIntro to Data Analysis, Economic Statistics and Econometrics
Intro to Data Analysis, Economic Statistics and Econometrics Statistics deals with the techniques for collecting and analyzing data that arise in many different contexts. Econometrics involves the development
More informationOn the Degree of Openness of an Open Economy Carlos Alfredo Rodriguez, Universidad del CEMA Buenos Aires, Argentina
On the Degree of Openness of an Open Economy Carlos Alfredo Rodriguez, Universidad del CEMA Buenos Aires, Argentina car@cema.edu.ar www.cema.edu.ar\~car Version1February 14,2000 All data can be consulted
More informationThe Contribution of Human capital to European Economic Growth: An empirical exploration from a panel data
The Contribution of Human capital to European Economic Growth: An empirical exploration from a panel data Menbere Workie Tiruneh 1 Marek Radvansky 2 Abstract The paper empirically investigates the extent
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS CREDITOR PROTECTION AND BANKING SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS CREDITOR PROTECTION AND BANKING SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA Simon Deakin, University of Cambridge, UK Panicos Demetriades, University of Leicester, UK Gregory James, University
More informationWhat explains modes of engagement in international trade? Conference paper for Kiel International Economics Papers 2011. Current Version: June 2011
What explains modes of engagement in international trade? Conference paper for Kiel International Economics Papers 2011 Current Version: June 2011 Natalia Trofimenko Kiel Institute for World Economy Hindenburgufer
More informationSummary. Developing with Jobs
Do not publish or DiStribute before 00:01 Gmt on tuesday 27 may 2014 Summary Developing with Jobs World of Work Report 2014 Developing with jobs Executive Summary INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION RESEARCH
More informationReal GDP. Percentage of 1960 real GDP per capita. per capita. 2000 real GDP. (1996 dollars) per capita. Real GDP
KrugmanMacro_SM_Ch08.qxp 11/9/05 4:47 PM Page 99 LongRun Economic Growth 1. The accompanying table shows data from the Penn World Table, Version 6.1, for real GDP in 1996 U.S. dollars for Argentina, Ghana,
More informationEmployment, unemployment and real economic growth. Ivan Kitov Institute for the Dynamics of the Geopsheres, Russian Academy of Sciences
Employment, unemployment and real economic growth Ivan Kitov Institute for the Dynamics of the Geopsheres, Russian Academy of Sciences Oleg Kitov Department of Economics, University of Oxford Abstract
More informationthe points are called control points approximating curve
Chapter 4 Spline Curves A spline curve is a mathematical representation for which it is easy to build an interface that will allow a user to design and control the shape of complex curves and surfaces.
More informationAnnex 5A Trends in international carbon dioxide emissions
Annex 5A Trends in international carbon dioxide emissions 5A.1 A global effort will be needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to arrest climate change. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
More informationSENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND INFERENCE. Lecture 12
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercialShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this
More informationIncome Distribution Dynamics and ProPoor Growth in the World from 1970 to 2003
Income Distribution Dynamics and ProPoor Growth in the World from 1970 to 2003 Hajo Holzmann Sebastian Vollmer Julian Weisbrod This draft: June 2008 Abstract We estimate and analyze the global income
More informationCharting Income Inequality
Charting Inequality Resources for policy making Module 000 Charting Inequality Resources for policy making Charting Inequality by Lorenzo Giovanni Bellù, Agricultural Policy Support Service, Policy Assistance
More informationBNG 202 Biomechanics Lab. Descriptive statistics and probability distributions I
BNG 202 Biomechanics Lab Descriptive statistics and probability distributions I Overview The overall goal of this short course in statistics is to provide an introduction to descriptive and inferential
More informationPoverty and Inequality in Indonesia. From Suharto to SBY
Poverty and Inequality in Indonesia From Suharto to SBY The Asian Debate on Poverty In Asia the debate on the benefits of economic growth began in the 1970. In Indonesia there were heated debates from
More informationDo R&D or Capital Expenditures Impact Wage Inequality? Evidence from the IT Industry in Taiwan ROC
Lai, Journal of International and Global Economic Studies, 6(1), June 2013, 4853 48 Do R&D or Capital Expenditures Impact Wage Inequality? Evidence from the IT Industry in Taiwan ROC YuCheng Lai * Shih
More information2013 MBA Jump Start Program. Statistics Module Part 3
2013 MBA Jump Start Program Module 1: Statistics Thomas Gilbert Part 3 Statistics Module Part 3 Hypothesis Testing (Inference) Regressions 2 1 Making an Investment Decision A researcher in your firm just
More informationBootstrapping Multivariate Spectra
Bootstrapping Multivariate Spectra Jeremy Berkowitz Federal Reserve Board Francis X. Diebold University of Pennsylvania and NBER his Draft August 3, 1997 Address correspondence to: F.X. Diebold Department
More informationEFN REPORT. ECONOMIC OUTLOOK FOR THE EURO AREA IN 2013 and 2014
EFN REPORT ECONOMIC OUTLOOK FOR THE EURO AREA IN 2013 and 2014 Autumn 2013 1 About the European ing Network The European ing Network (EFN) is a research group of European institutions, founded in 2001
More informationIntroduction to nonparametric regression: Least squares vs. Nearest neighbors
Introduction to nonparametric regression: Least squares vs. Nearest neighbors Patrick Breheny October 30 Patrick Breheny STA 621: Nonparametric Statistics 1/16 Introduction For the remainder of the course,
More informationMain trends in industry in 2014 and thoughts on future developments. (April 2015)
Main trends in industry in 2014 and thoughts on future developments (April 2015) Development of the industrial sector in 2014 After two years of recession, industrial production returned to growth in 2014.
More informationAnalysis of Bayesian Dynamic Linear Models
Analysis of Bayesian Dynamic Linear Models Emily M. Casleton December 17, 2010 1 Introduction The main purpose of this project is to explore the Bayesian analysis of Dynamic Linear Models (DLMs). The main
More informationCourse Text. Required Computing Software. Course Description. Course Objectives. StraighterLine. Business Statistics
Course Text Business Statistics Lind, Douglas A., Marchal, William A. and Samuel A. Wathen. Basic Statistics for Business and Economics, 7th edition, McGrawHill/Irwin, 2010, ISBN: 9780077384470 [This
More informationSummary. Accessibility and utilisation of health services in Ghana 245
Summary The thesis examines the factors that impact on access and utilisation of health services in Ghana. The utilisation behaviour of residents of a typical urban and a typical rural district are used
More information