The Role and Development of Systems Engineers

Transcription

1 The Role and Development of Systems Engineers A Defence Industry Perspective Terry Stevenson Chief Technology Officer 02 November 2009 Unclassified Copyright 2009 Raytheon Australia. All rights reserved. Customer Success Is Our Mission is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.

2 Objectives of Presentation Doug Roser has asked me to discuss the following: 1. The Role of Systems Engineers in defence Projects and operations. 2 Is there a need for Systems Engineers to specialise in particular systems or do they just require generic competencies which can be applied to all systems? 3. The role for Systems Engineers in the services, DMO and industry? 4. How does industry obtain them, are they recruited with the required skills? If not how do they receive the training to develop the required competencies and how are these competencies accredited? 11/10/2009 Page 2

3 Some Definitions (As we all speak a different language!) 11/10/2009 Page 3

4 System Definition A system is a set of functional elements organized to satisfy user needs. These functional elements include hardware, software, people, facilities, data, and services. A system includes the product design, and the facilities, equipment, special tooling, or processes for establishing the manufacturing, test, distribution, training, support, operations, and disposal capabilities. Typically, a system is the major deliverable from a project. From: On Line IPDS Glossary, Rev 0.9, April /10/2009 Page 4

5 What is Systems Engineering? Systems Engineering is a multi-faceted discipline, involving human, organizational, and various technical variables that work together to create complex systems. At Raytheon, the entire process of developing a system from initial user need, through design, development, delivery, and eventual disposal are part of the Systems Engineering function. 11/10/2009 Page 5

6 What is a Systems Engineer? A Systems Engineer performs one or more of the roles which forms part of the System Engineering function. The Systems Engineers sphere of influence is different from other Engineering disciplines. Systems Engineers are concerned with the entire life cycle of a system. This means that you must understand all aspects of the life cycle from original concept to eventual retirement and disposal of the system. A role is a logical grouping of tasks that are performed by a Systems Engineer. A single Systems Engineer or several Systems Engineers may perform a single role. Systems Engineering is naturally a broad field. No one person will perform all roles at once and many engineers will never perform all roles even over an entire career. 11/10/2009 Page 6

7 The System It s All About Perspective! Item Company 1 Automobile Manufacturer Company 2 Engine Supplier Company 3 Water Pump Supplier Automobile System Engine Product System Water Pump Component Product System Pump Device, Hoses, Clamps Component Product Check-valve, Screws, Washers Component 11/10/2009 Page 7

8 Example: Global Hawk What is the System? 48 Ku-Band Wideband SATCOM Antenna Conventional Aluminum Fuselage Graphite Composite Empennage Allison AE-3007 Turbofan Engine Enhanced Integrated Sensor Suite (EISS) Pressurized Payload/Avionics Compartments Graphite Composite Wing 11/10/2009 Page 8

9 Observation Raytheon regards Systems Engineering as a Discipline! Engineers Australia and many other Engineering Societies do not regard Systems Engineering as a Discipline (Fact). To many organisations Systems Engineering is seen as a Process (Opinion). For Example, Engineers Australia does not have a College of Systems Engineering but there is a Technical Society: Systems Engineering Society of Australia; SESA. IEEE and IET have a similar approach. Non System Engineers undertake Systems Engineering activities. 11/10/2009 Page 9

10 Systems Engineering Overview 11/10/2009 Page 10

11 How Engineering is Organised Chief Technology Officer Terry Stevenson ETC Executive Engineering Director AWD Engineering Director Engineering Director Integrated Solutions Engineering Director Integrated Solutions Engineering Director Mission Support Systems Engineering Discipline Lead Software Engineering Discipline Lead Electrical / Electronic Discipline Lead Integrated Solutions Systems Engineering Functional Manager Integrated Solutions Software Engineering Functional Manager Mission Support Engineering System Manager Mission Support Configuration Management Lead Mission Support Maintenance System Manager Mission Support Logistics System Manager Structural / Mechanical Discipline Lead l Systems Safety Engineering Discipline Lead Integrated Solutions Hardware Engineering Functional Manager Integrated Solutions CM/DM Functional Manager Mission Support Aeroskills Training Advisor Production Engineering Discipline Lead Program Engineering Managers (Various) Program Engineering Managers / Technical Leads (Various) Discipline Leads ILS Discipline Lead Manufacturing/ Maintenance Discipline Lead Drafting Discipline Lead CM / DM Discipline Lead Discipline Leads responsible for the conduct of activities within their discipline across all business areas. Selected by ETC Executive (CTO plus Engineering Directors). Primary Roles of Discipline Lead are to: control who is authorised to perform work within their discipline (Competency Framework and assessment validation) define the process to be followed when performing this work (process and design guidance), and assist personnel managers with career development planning for those within their discipline. 11/10/2009 Page 11

12 Engineering Disciplines - Organisation Systems(21%) Software(7%) Electrical / Electronic(47%) Sustaining(7%) Structural / Mechanical(6%) IT(4%) Technical Managers(4%) Technical Drafting(1%) CM(4%) Mature capability in disciplines that support business 11/10/2009 Page 12

13 Defining a System/Product Breakdown Structure 11/10/2009 Page 13

14 Standard Life Cycle Model 11/10/2009 Page 14

15 System Life Cycle & IPDP Adapted from The Creation of Systems and Software Standards by an Evolutionary Process by Brook, Arnold, Barnes, and Stevens, 1996 IPDP Stage 3 IPDP Stage 5 Derived Requirements User System Requirements Feasibility Evaluation System Validation Completed Operational System System Level System Requirements Activities Architectural Design + Derivation Activities System Integration & Verification Completed Tested System Derived Requirements Feasibility Evaluation Product Level Product Requirements Activities Architectural Design + Derivation Activities Product Integration & Verification Completed Products Derived Requirements Feasibility Evaluation Component Level Component Requirements Activities Architectural Design + Derivation Activities Component Integration & Verification Completed Components Derived Requirements Feasibility Evaluation Design & Development IPDP Stage 4 11/10/2009 Page 15

16 Requirements & Architecture Development 11/10/2009 Page 16

17 System Requirements Definition 11/10/2009 Page 17

18 System Architecture Development 11/10/2009 Page 18

19 System Functional Architecture Development Process - IPDP 11/10/2009 Page 19

20 System Physical Architecture Development Process - IPDP System Requirements Synthesis Functional Definition Functional Analysis Functional Architecture Technical Requirements Interfaces Select Solutions from Alternatives CI definition Preliminary System Design Detailed Design Requirements Flow-down System Physical Architecture Description (Product Baseline) CI = Configuration Item Design Loop Evaluate Candidates Validate Requirements Assess Risk CI Definitions Specifications Interface Specifications Systems Analysis and Trades 11/10/2009 Page 20

21 Independent Review (IR-6) & Gate-6 System Functional Review (SFR) Gate 6 focus on Big Questions System requirements and architecture development maturity assessment Planning details and resources in in place to to successfully execute the Stage 4 tasks? What are the major technical, cost, and schedule risks and opportunities? Gate 6 System Functional Review (SFR) Customer Review (if required) Peer Review Peer Review Peer Reviews SRR, SAR, PRR, PAR Part of Development Flow IPT members and peer / SME review of individual work products Independent Review (IR-6) Maturity evaluated by independent team, e.g., Program Level / Milestone (Next Phase Readiness) System and Product requirements and architecture ready to support preliminary design activities? Note: A Successful Customer SFR does NOT satisfy the IPDS requirement for Peer Reviews, IR-6 and Gate 6 Review. 11/10/2009 Page 21

22 Integrated Product Teams (IPT) Cross Product Teams Systems Engineering CM/DM Quality/Safety Facilities Field Service Production Manufacturing Program Office Project Director Chief Engineer Program Manager Deputy Program Manager Customer Business Management Team Contracts Subcontracts Security Financial Administration Procurement Technical IPT #1 Hardware Software Technical IPT #2 Hardware Software Technical IPT #N Hardware Networks 11/10/2009 Page 22

23 Biggest Change in last 5 years (Architecture and Integration!) 11/10/2009 Page 23

24 Raytheon Mission Architecture Program Tasks Define processes and Coordinate all architecture activities across Raytheon Develop Reference Architectures and Architecture Tools Run the Corporate Architecture Review Board Develop Certified Architects (RCAP) Provide Leadership in Standards Bodies Approach Institutionalize architecture within our processes across Raytheon Make architecting capabilities available to variety of stakeholders Architects, Systems Engineers, Business Developers, Program Managers Insert architecting early in program development RayMAP Integrates all of Raytheon Architecting Activities 11/10/2009 Page 24

25 Elements of RayMAP: Raytheon Certified Architect Program Raytheon s company-wide, formal certification program for systems & enterprise architects Six criteria areas Training provided by internal and external experts External certifications The Open Group and SEI Leadership and communication skills System lifecycle experience Contributions to the architecture discipline (within and outside Raytheon) Orals before a Certification Review Board Current status More than 200 participants currently in program IDS, IIS, NCS, RMS, RTSC, SAS Engineering, IT/IS, Manufacturing United States, Australia, United Kingdom Governed by Raytheon s Corporate Architecture Review Board 11/10/2009 Page 25

26 Elements of RayMAP: Raytheon Enterprise Architecture Process Raytheon s company-wide, standards-based architecting process Unification of government & industry architecture standards Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF) Zachman Framework for Enterprise Architecture The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM ) Systems architecting process extended with enterprise architecting support Updated annually Governed by Raytheon s Corporate Architecture Review Board REAP Process that integrates the best practices from across the industry 11/10/2009 Page 26

27 Elements of RayMAP: Architecture Collaboration Tool Components Architecture Repository Architecture Tools Architecture Community Web based portals that link to standard commercial tools 11/10/2009 Page 27

28 Elements of RayMAP: Architecture Standards Collaboration Office of the Secretary of Defense Networks and Information Integration (OSD/NII) DoDAF 2.0 Working Group DoD Certified Architect program (upcoming) The Open Group Architecture Forum, Real-Time Embedded Systems Forum International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) Architecture Working Group Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Architecture Competency Growth Software Architecture and Product Line areas Object Management Group (OMG) Systems Modeling Language (SysML) UML Profile for DoDAF & MODAF (UPDM) Zachman Institute for Framework Advancement (ZIFA) Mission analysis approaches Zachman synergies with other frameworks Processes and Methods Built on International Standards 11/10/2009 Page 28

29 RayMAP Summary RayMAP : a suite of architecting enablers to Develop highly complex next-generation, net-centric systems for the Global Information Grid and beyond Grow Raytheon s business as a Mission Systems Integrator Enter new markets of business opportunity RayMAP: Enabling Mission Success Leading the Industry 11/10/2009 Page 29

30 Raytheon Australia Role (Mission System Integrator (MSI)) 11/10/2009 Page 30

31 Raytheon Australia Role as MSI The Mission System Integrator: Specifies the System; Undertakes CAIV Analysis; Architects the system and defines the Integration Strategy; In conjunction with the customer, selects the appropriate technology; In conjunction with the customer, through the use of Trade Studies and Make/ Buy/ Reuse processes, selects Subsystems, Products and Components; Integrates the System/ Subsystems, Products and Components; Verifies System Requirements at all levels; Supports Validation against the Users requirements; Provides evolutionary and technology upgrades through Life of Type. Note: The MSI designs for Support but is not the Support Function There is a separate Mission Support Function 11/10/2009 Page 31

32 Core Competencies of MSI The Core Competencies of the MSI are as follows: Systems Engineering. Program Management. Through-Life Support (Acquisition Phase). Contract Management. In the case of the MSI this is a larger role than in other circumstances. Program Management and Systems Engineering are the dominant core competencies; all core competencies are co-dependent. 11/10/2009 Page 32

33 Systems Engineering Core Competency Skills Systems Engineering Competencies: Chief Engineer Lead Systems Engineer System Architect Requirements Engineer Systems Analyst Integration Engineering Verification & Validation Engineering Speciality Engineering Systems Process Engineering Processes and Tools Doors Tau Architect Systems Architect Enterprise Architect MATLAB Criterium DecisionPlus Matrix etc Technology Domain Specific (Comms, Combat System ) Active Phased Arrays Digital Signal Processing Composite structures Embedded Real Time Systems FPGA s Data Fusion Nano technology etc 11/10/2009 Page 33

34 Individual Systems Engineering Roles 11/10/2009 Page 34

35 Systems Engineering Roles Chief Engineer Lead Systems Engineer System Architect Integration Engineer Systems Analyst Requirements Engineer Verification & Validation Engineer System Processing Engineer Speciality Engineer Reliability Maintainability Safety / Environment Human Factors /HIS Supportability Security Skills are generally not transferrable between some roles 11/10/2009 Page 35

36 System Engineering Roles System Engineering Role Description Chief Engineer Lead System Engineer Oversee all technical aspects of a major program or business area. Acts as principal Systems Engineer for a program. Requirements Engineer System Architect Ensures that every requirement is identified and assigned to someone, all requirements are accounted for, the integrity and parent / child traceability(links), versions are maintained, and all changes are tracked and controlled. Transforms the architectural description into a system design. System Analyst Integration Engineer Determines how well a system can perform its intended function, and expresses results in terms that are quantitative and objective. Ensures that the delivered product functions as designed. Verification & Validation Engineer System Process Engineer Speciality Engineer Ensures that the delivered product meets all system requirements and satisfies the needs of the end-user. Facilitates the deployment of the Integrated Development System (IPDS) Overseas various specialty engineering tasks, such as, reliability, maintainability, supportability and human 11/10/2009 engineering. Page 36

37 Business Strategy Planning & Execution IPDS Stage 1 LSE responsibilities: Finalize technical organization Develop and manage staffing plan Implement Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) Coordinate and integrate activities among all engineering disciplines Direct & coordinate preparation of system documentation Ensure technical integrity of system/product/services Assure specialty engineering support inserted at right stage 1 - Business Strategy Execution GATE 1 INTEREST / NO INTEREST GATE 2 PURSUE / NO PURSUE Raytheon Australia IPDS Structure GATE 3 BID / NO BID PROGRAM CAPTURE / PROPOSAL PROJECT PLANNING System Reviews GATE 4 BID / PROPOSAL GATE 5 START-UP PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL 3 - Requirements and Architecture Development REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION IBR GATE 6 SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT Planning 4 - Product Design and Development GATE 7 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PRELIMINARY DESIGN Planning 2 Program Leadership, Management and Control GATE 8 CRITICAL DESIGN DETAILED DESIGN COMPONENT BUILD & VERIFICATION 6 - Production and Deployment 7 - Operations and Support 5- Integration, Test, Verification and Validation GATE 9 TEST READINESS INTEGRATION GATE 10 PRODUCTION READINESS VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION PRODUCTION PLANNING PROJECT TRANSITION AND SHUTDOWN PRODUCTION & DELIVERY SRR SFR PDR DDR TRR PRR FCA PCA O & S MANAGEMENT MISSION SUPPORT AND SERVICES GATE 11 TRANSITION AND CLOSURE 11/10/2009 Page 37

38 Requirements & Architecture Development IPDS Stage 3 LSE responsibilities: Develop and verify functional architecture for the system Develop, verify and assess a physical solution based on functional architecture Establish functional and physical architectures by allocating requirements to product and component levels Raytheon Australia IPDS Structure 1 - Business Strategy Execution GATE 4 GATE 1 GATE 2 GATE 3 BID / INTEREST / PURSUE / NO BID / NO BID PROPOSAL NO INTEREST PURSUE PROGRAM CAPTURE / PROPOSAL 2 Program Leadership, Management and Control GATE 5 PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT START-UP MANAGEMENT TRANSITION AND PLANNING AND CONTROL SHUTDOWN 3 - Requirements and 4 - Product Design and Development 5- Integration, Test, Verification Architecture Development and Validation GATE 6 GATE 7 GATE 8 GATE 9 SYSTEM PRELIMINARY CRITICAL TEST FUNCTIONAL DESIGN DESIGN READINESS GATE 11 TRANSITION AND CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN DETAILED DESIGN INTEGRATION VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT Planning COMPONENT BUILD & VERIFICATION 6 - Production and Deployment GATE 10 PRODUCTION READINESS PRODUCTION PLANNING PRODUCTION & DELIVERY O & S MANAGEMENT Planning 7 - Operations and Support MISSION SUPPORT AND SERVICES System Reviews IBR SRR SFR PDR DDR TRR PRR FCA PCA 11/10/2009 Page 38

39 Product Design & Development IPDS Stage 4 LSE responsibilities: Revise program plans as needed Finalize customer requirements Evaluate and reduce risk Develop a design concept (CONOPS) Identify configuration items Conduct requirements and design reviews Validate design meets spec requirements Develop integration and verification plans/strategies 1 - Business Strategy Execution GATE 1 INTEREST / NO INTEREST GATE 2 PURSUE / NO PURSUE Raytheon Australia IPDS Structure GATE 3 BID / NO BID PROGRAM CAPTURE / PROPOSAL PROJECT PLANNING System Reviews GATE 4 BID / PROPOSAL GATE 5 START-UP PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL 3 - Requirements and Architecture Development REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION IBR GATE 6 SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT Planning 4 - Product Design and Development GATE 7 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PRELIMINARY DESIGN Planning 2 Program Leadership, Management and Control GATE 8 CRITICAL DESIGN DETAILED DESIGN COMPONENT BUILD & VERIFICATION 6 - Production and Deployment 7 - Operations and Support 5- Integration, Test, Verification and Validation GATE 9 TEST READINESS INTEGRATION GATE 10 PRODUCTION READINESS VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION PRODUCTION PLANNING PROJECT TRANSITION AND SHUTDOWN PRODUCTION & DELIVERY SRR SFR PDR DDR TRR PRR FCA PCA O & S MANAGEMENT MISSION SUPPORT AND SERVICES GATE 11 TRANSITION AND CLOSURE 11/10/2009 Page 39

40 Systems Integration, Verification, & Validation (IV&V) IPDS Stage 5 Documents Produced (integration plans, verification procedures, test reports, user guides, courses, installation plans, etc.) LSE oversees/monitors the following: Hardware and software testing Development of manuals Systems Integration Systems Verification Systems Validation Installation preparations 1 - Business Strategy Execution GATE 1 INTEREST / NO INTEREST GATE 2 PURSUE / NO PURSUE Raytheon Australia IPDS Structure GATE 3 BID / NO BID PROGRAM CAPTURE / PROPOSAL PROJECT PLANNING System Reviews GATE 4 BID / PROPOSAL GATE 5 START-UP PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL 3 - Requirements and Architecture Development REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION IBR GATE 6 SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT Planning 4 - Product Design and Development GATE 7 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PRELIMINARY DESIGN Planning 2 Program Leadership, Management and Control GATE 8 CRITICAL DESIGN DETAILED DESIGN COMPONENT BUILD & VERIFICATION 6 - Production and Deployment 7 - Operations and Support 5- Integration, Test, Verification and Validation GATE 9 TEST READINESS INTEGRATION GATE 10 PRODUCTION READINESS VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION PRODUCTION PLANNING PROJECT TRANSITION AND SHUTDOWN PRODUCTION & DELIVERY SRR SFR PDR DDR TRR PRR FCA PCA O & S MANAGEMENT MISSION SUPPORT AND SERVICES GATE 11 TRANSITION AND CLOSURE 11/10/2009 Page 40

41 Product Deployment/Operation & Support IPDS Stage 6 LSE oversees the following: Production schedules Readiness Reviews (internal/external) System IV&V installation Site system tasks (installations, validation, maintenance, operation) Site integration and verification Introduce modifications and system improvements Support equipment, spare parts, training, technical documentation, and technical services 1 - Business Strategy Execution GATE 1 INTEREST / NO INTEREST GATE 2 PURSUE / NO PURSUE Raytheon Australia IPDS Structure GATE 3 BID / NO BID PROGRAM CAPTURE / PROPOSAL PROJECT PLANNING System Reviews GATE 4 BID / PROPOSAL GATE 5 START-UP PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL 3 - Requirements and Architecture Development REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION IBR GATE 6 SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT Planning 4 - Product Design and Development GATE 7 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PRELIMINARY DESIGN Planning 2 Program Leadership, Management and Control GATE 8 CRITICAL DESIGN DETAILED DESIGN COMPONENT BUILD & VERIFICATION 6 - Production and Deployment 7 - Operations and Support 5- Integration, Test, Verification and Validation GATE 9 TEST READINESS INTEGRATION GATE 10 PRODUCTION READINESS VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION PRODUCTION PLANNING PROJECT TRANSITION AND SHUTDOWN PRODUCTION & DELIVERY SRR SFR PDR DDR TRR PRR FCA PCA O & S MANAGEMENT MISSION SUPPORT AND SERVICES GATE 11 TRANSITION AND CLOSURE 11/10/2009 Page 41

42 Example System Structure Systems Engineering is essential for complex systems Large Numbers of Subsystems (Segments and Elements) Effective Systems Engineering Integrates the Activities across the subsystems by tying the IPTs together Program Leadership Technical Leadership Systems Engineering Cross Product Teams Integrated Product Teams Vehicle Computing Sensors Control Actuation Support Requirements Architecture System Effectiveness Reliability Maintainability Integration, Test & Evaluation Supportability Integrating the 80% of the Team who are not Systems Engineers 11/10/2009 Page 42

43 Training and Development 11/10/2009 Page 43

44 How we train our Systems Engineers Raytheon Certified Architect Program Principles of Systems Engineering Requirements Integration, V&V Trade Studies Systems Engineering Technical Development Program Architecting Methods Elements of Architecture Architect Certification Process RLI elearning Offerings Fundamentals of Systems Planning Fundamentals of Test and Evaluation Fundamentals of EVM Program Management Tools.. Introduction to Systems Architecture Art and Science of Systems Architecture Core Training Optional Specialist Training Mission Systems Integration Podcasts Systems Engineering Symposiums 11/10/2009 Page 44

45 PoSE History In 2002 Raytheon s Systems Engineering Council (SEC) partnered with the Raytheon Learning Institute s (RLI s) Engineering Institute to design and develop a new course for the enterprise. The SEC and business units provided the subject matter experts (SMEs); RLI has provided the course developers and the funding. 17 SMEs from 5 different business and 13 sites joined 5 course developers for a design blitz in November, 2002 to kick off the design and development effort. Clearly defined Roles and Standard Processes for Systems Engineering 11/10/2009 Page 45

46 PoSE Course Framework Module 1 Introduction to Systems Engineering Module 2 Requirements Development Module 3 Functional Analysis & Requirements Allocation Module 4 System Architecture and System Design Module 5 Integration, Verification, and Validation Module 6 - Trade Studies Module 7 - Systems Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation Module 8 - Specialty Engineering Module 9 - Risk Management Module 10 - Technical Planning and Management 11/10/2009 Page 46

47 Certification of Systems Engineers INCOSE and some other organisations do have a certification process. In Australia certification has not really progressed and is not seen as a requirement (Opinion). Raytheon Australia has a competency model for all disciplines, including Systems Engineering, but does not certify Systems Engineers. 11/10/2009 Page 47

48 Engineer Career Road Map Discipline / Competency Based Engineering & Technology Stream Engineer Lead Engineer Experienced Engineer Principal Engineer Senior Engineer Engineering Fellow Level 5 (eg ESESN) Level 6 (eg ESEPR) (eg ESEFL) Senior Engineering Fellow (eg ESEFS) Level 1 (eg ESEE1) Level 2 (eg ESEE2 Level 3 (EG ESEE3) Level 4 (eg ESEE4) Professional Association recognition (CPEng) Technical Manager or Project Engineer (EEMEM) Functional Manager (EEMFM) Engineering Director (EEMDR) Selection based on Raytheon (US) criteria Chief Technology Officer (QEXEX) Engineering & Technology Management Stream 11/10/2009 Page 48

49 How are they recruited and trained? There is a general movement of Systems Engineers around the industry based on where the programs are being executed. Each company has their own flavour of Systems Engineering and generally baselines new recruits on company processes and procedures. Each company generally has its own development path for Systems Engineers. There are accreditation Programs, such as INCOSE, however, industry has mixed views on these. Some companies have internal accreditation programs. 11/10/2009 Page 49

50 Summary A system is a group of interacting elements that is organized and works together to perform specific tasks and satisfy user needs. Systems Engineers define, develop, and deploy systems. Systems Engineering is a multi-faceted discipline, involving human, organizational, and various technical variables that work together to create complex systems. Systems Engineers are involved throughout the entire product life cycle. There are currently nine defined Systems Engineering roles within a Project. These roles can be performed by an individual or a group of individuals. 11/10/2009 Page 50

51 Summary IPDS is a collection of business process and tools that supports the Systems Engineering process An Integrated Product Team (IPT) is a cross-functional team of developers and other supporting roles involved in developing and producing an integrated product The major elements of Systems Engineering are integrated into the project life cycle An efficient, orderly Systems Engineering process for defining and developing large systems is critical to Raytheon's business 11/10/2009 Page 51

52 Some Final Observations Very few Universities in Australia teach System Engineering at the undergraduate level. Undergraduate training in System Engineering overseas is quite common. There is limited Post Graduate training in System Engineering in Australia. Each company has its own approach to System Engineering and there is general alignment with DMO. Raytheon does all Systems Engineering training internally to ensure alignment with company processes. Raytheon invites the customer, stakeholders and SME s to internal training. The EIA-632 Standard appears to be the most favoured approach to the Engineering of Systems by DMO. Network Centric Systems and System of Systems has raised an awareness of System Engineering. A joint DMO/DSTO initiative, DSI-TA is looking at System Engineering training within the defence sector. 11/10/2009 Page 52