STANDARD 4 ELEMENT RATING TABLE and ELEMENT EVALUATION FORMS. Survey Team Standard 4 Element Rating Table

Transcription

1 STANDARD 4 ELEMENT TABLE and ELEMENT EVALUATION FORMS STANDARD 4: FACULTY PREPARATION, PRODUCTIVITY, PARTICIPATION, AND POLICIES The faculty members of a medical school are qualified through their education, training, experience, and continuing professional development and provide the leadership and support necessary to attain the institution's educational, research, and service goals. Survey Team Standard 4 Element Rating Table Standard 4 Faculty Preparation, Productivity, Participation, and Policies Element 4.1 Sufficiency of Faculty 4.2 Scholarly Productivity 4.3 Faculty Appointment Policies 4.4 Feedback to Faculty 4.5 Faculty Professional Development 4.6 Faculty/Dean Responsibility for Educational Program Policies Label the number of the element using the following code. Labeling Code Colour * monitoring Note: If element 4.1 was rated as, the cell with the corresponding element number would be shaded green as shown above as an example. Standard 4 Survey Team Element Rating Table and Evaluation Forms Page 1 of 8

2 Standard 4 Summary of Findings The following is the Summary of Survey Team Findings for Standard 4 that are linked to elements rated as s (S*), with a need for Monitoring (SM) or (US). The findings are listed in order by the number of the element. Delete elements rated as satisfactory. Element Rating S*, SM, US Standard 4 Faculty Preparation, Productivity, Participation, and Policies 4.1 Sufficiency of Faculty 4.2 Scholarly Productivity 4.3 Faculty Appointment Policies 4.4 Feedback to Faculty 4.5 Faculty Professional Development 4.6 Faculty/Dean Responsibility for Educational Program Policies Note: See Survey Team Evaluation of Elements section D of the Survey Report Guide regarding the formulation of findings. Standard 4 Survey Team Element Rating Table and Evaluation Forms Page 2 of 8

3 4.1 SUFFICIENCY OF FACULTY A medical school has in place a sufficient cohort of faculty members with the qualifications and time required to deliver the medical curriculum and to meet the other needs and fulfill the other missions of the medical school. 4.1 a The medical school has a sufficient number and types of faculty members to deliver the medical education program at each campus. 4.1 b The directors of required learning experiences, hospital site directors, campus site directors (includes longitudinal integrated clerkship site directors) and the chair of the curriculum committee (or equivalent committee) have the appropriate amount of protected time (time with salary support or release from other responsibilities) to fulfill their responsibilities in the medical education program. 4.1 c The medical school anticipates faculty retirements and plans recruitment activities to minimize any negative impact on the delivery of the medical education program at each campus. 4.1 d Review of the documentation related to this element and discussions with relevant individuals with a need for monitoring Standard 4 Survey Team Element Rating Table and Evaluation Forms Page 3 of 8

4 4.2 SCHOLARLY PRODUCTIVITY The medical school s faculty, as a whole, demonstrate a commitment to continuing scholarly productivity that is characteristic of an institution of higher learning. 4.2 a The scholarly productivity (articles in peer-reviewed journals, published books/book chapters, co-investigators or PIs on extramural grants, or other peer-reviewed scholarship) of the medical school s faculty, as a whole, over the last three years is consistent with its research/scholarly mission and characteristic of an institution of higher learning. 4.2 b The medical school requires some faculty members to engage in scholarly work for promotion, and if applicable tenure. 4.2 c The medical school fosters and supports faculty members development as scholars by appropriate means. 4.2 d Review of the documentation related to this element and discussions with relevant individuals with a need for monitoring Standard 4 Survey Team Element Rating Table and Evaluation Forms Page 4 of 8

5 4.3 FACULTY APPOINTMENT POLICIES A medical school has clear policies and procedures in place for faculty appointment, renewal of appointment, promotion, granting of tenure, remediation, and dismissal that involve a faculty member, the appropriate department head(s), and the dean, and provides each faculty member with written information about his or her term of appointment, responsibilities, lines of communication, privileges and benefits, performance evaluation and remediation, terms of dismissal, and, if relevant, the policy on practice earnings. 4.3 a The medical school s or university s policies and procedures for faculty appointment, renewal of appointment, promotion, granting of tenure, remediation, and dismissal are clear. 4.3 b If the medical school has different employment (career) tracks, the description of the requirements for each track is clear. The information about career tracks is communicated to faculty as well as the selection or assignment process, and the requirements for advancement within the career tracks. 4.3 c Each faculty member is given written information about his or her term of appointment, responsibilities in teaching, research and where relevant patient care, lines of communication, privileges and benefits, performance evaluation and remediation, terms of dismissal, and if relevant, the policy on practice earnings. 4.3 d Each faculty member is notified regularly of the terms and conditions employment including privileges, benefits, compensation including policies on practice earnings, and responsibilities in teaching, research and where relevant patient care. 4.3 e Each faculty member is notified in timely way when there are changes made to his or her terms of employment including privileges, benefits, compensation including policies on practice earnings, and responsibilities in teaching, research and where relevant patient care. 4.3 f Review of the documentation related to this element and discussions with relevant individuals with a need for monitoring Standard 4 Survey Team Element Rating Table and Evaluation Forms Page 5 of 8

6 4.4 FEEDBACK TO FACULTY A medical school faculty member receives regularly scheduled and timely feedback from departmental and/or other programmatic or institutional leaders on his or her academic performance and progress toward promotion and, when applicable, tenure. 4.4 a Faculty members receive regularly scheduled and timely feedback from departmental and/or medical education program or university leaders on his or her academic performance and progress toward promotion and, when applicable, tenure (there is documentation to support this statement) at each campus. 4.4 b The provision of regular and timely feedback to faculty members is monitored to ensure it occurs. 4.4 c The medical school or the university has policies that require faculty to receive regular formal feedback on their performance and their progress toward promotion and, if relevant, tenure. 4.4 d Review of the documentation related to this element and discussions with relevant individuals with a need for monitoring Standard 4 Survey Team Element Rating Table and Evaluation Forms Page 6 of 8

7 4.5 FACULTY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT A medical school and/or the university provides opportunities for professional development to each faculty member (e.g., in the areas of teaching and student assessment, curricular design, instructional methods, program evaluation or research) to enhance his or her skills and leadership abilities in these areas. 4.5 a There are individuals with the requisite expertise and time who assist faculty in improving their teaching and assessment skills. 4.5 b The medical school identifies faculty development needs. 4.5 c Faculty at all instructional sites and geographically distributed campuses are informed about and have access to faculty development activities. 4.5 d When problems are identified with the teaching or assessment skills of a faculty member, the faculty member is provided with support to remediate the deficiencies. 4.5 e There are individuals with the requisite expertise and formal activities at the medical school, departmental or university level to assist faculty in enhancing their skills in curriculum design, instructional methods or program evaluation. 4.5 f There are individuals with the requisite expertise and formal activities at the medical school, departmental or university level to assist faculty in enhancing their skills in research methodology, publication development, or grant procurement. 4.5 g There are specific programs or activities offered to assist faculty in preparing for promotion. 4.5 h During the last academic year, a number of faculty development programs (e.g., workshops, lectures, seminars) were provided with good faculty participation. 4.5 i Review of the documentation related to this element and discussions with relevant individuals with a need for monitoring Standard 4 Survey Team Element Rating Table and Evaluation Forms Page 7 of 8

8 4.6 FACULTY/DEAN RESPONSIBILITY FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM POLICIES At a medical school, the dean and a committee of the faculty determine programmatic policies. 4.6 a There is an executive committee or other similar medical school leadership group responsible for working with the dean to determine medical school policies. 4.6 b This executive committee or other similar medical school leadership group meets often enough to fulfill its responsibilities. 4.6 c There is a list of priority areas that the committee addressed during the last academic year. 4.6 d Review of the documentation related to this element and discussions with relevant individuals with a need for monitoring Standard 4 Survey Team Element Rating Table and Evaluation Forms Page 8 of 8