1 California State University, Stanislaus Doctor of Education (Ed.D.), Educational Leadership Assessment Plan (excerpt of the WASC Substantive Change Proposal submitted to WASC August 25, 2007) A. Annual assessment leading to the program review Describe the annual assessment process for year one and subsequent years leading to the overall program review. Attach an assessment plan for the first several years of the program that describes how core faculty review the performance of the students in each cohort as it progresses annually to determine satisfactory progress. The assessment plan should include the review of student work and achievement of program learning outcomes as well as rubrics for assessment of the qualifying exam and the dissertation. CSU Stanislaus recognizes the complexity of assessment and the importance of designing measures that are multidimensional, meaningful, manageable, and oriented toward program improvement and enhanced student learning. Consequently, four interrelated components of quality indicators guide the evaluation of educational effectiveness: 1) Program Goals, 2) Student Learning Outcomes, 3) Faculty Quality, and 4) Accreditation. Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes for the doctoral program were developed in concert with educators in P 12 schools and community colleges. During the planning meetings, these partners described the specific qualities and skills most essential for future educational leaders. As a result, Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes are linked explicitly to the essential characteristics identified by the external partners. The program s design and delivery, admission standards, course content, and pedagogical methods are inextricably linked to achieving these outcomes. Faculty quality is evidenced primarily by successful P 14 educational preparation and experience; teaching/pedagogical effectiveness; rigor of research, scholarship, and creative activities; and strength of service contributions to P 12 schools and community colleges. The Program Director will coordinate the program s assessment process and data collection by organizing direct and indirect methods for assessing student learning, implementing actions for program improvement, attending assessment conferences and participating in faculty development workshops to stay current in assessment knowledge and skill, and leading doctoral faculty in shared conversations about student learning based on assessment information. A draft assessment plan has been developed and will be refined. As the assessment plan is a living document the Program Director in conjunction with core doctoral faculty will: 1. Evaluate and adjust as appropriate formative and summative methods for assessing Program Goals, Student Learning Outcomes, and faculty quality. 2. Identify the level of student attainment expected for each learning outcome; 3. Employ both direct and indirect methods for examination of students level of attainment; 4. Interpret assessment results ensuring actions are taken and documented for program improvement; 5. Identify the timetable for review of assessment reports by the Doctoral Executive Council, and Community Advisory Group; and 6. Determine methods for communicating to students, the campus, and the external community the ways in which the assessment results were used for program improvement.
2 A flow chart summarizing how the assessment plan was developed and will be implemented is attached. (See Attachment 42, Flow Chart of the Program Assessment Process) The methods used to assess Program Goals, Student Learning Outcomes, and Faculty Quality are critical components of the assessment process. The following methods have been designed to provide meaningful results. Each method is linked to Student Learning Outcomes and Program Goals. A summary of which method will be used for each outcome and goal can be found in Attachment 43, Assessment Matrix Table Student Learning Outcomes and Methods. Formative Assessment Assessment of Student Work (Embedded Assessment) For each learning objective, faculty will identify courses that introduce, reinforce, and address at an advanced level from both the core and specialization courses, in order to embed performance based prompts in course assignments. Faculty will then develop rubrics for these embedded assignments that provide scoring criteria specific to the assessment of the appropriate Student Learning Outcome. The criteria will draw upon emerging research and practices of professional/disciplinary organizations as related to student learning. The reliability and validity of the rubrics will occur through pilot testing, inter rater reliability methods, calibration over program cohorts, and faculty professional judgment. Each semester one or two learning outcomes from one of the four program goals will be evaluated. The Program Director will provide the instructor with the assignment and a copy of the rubric. The embedded course assignment will be graded as usual by the individual course instructors as related to the faculty s course specific learning outcomes. Students will be notified in the course syllabi that samples of their work will be used for program assessment and improvement. Faculty will use a purposeful sample method for selecting artifacts the professor of the course will select students work samples that represent 10% each of the lowest, middle, and highest achievement. The doctoral staff member will remove identifying student and faculty information from the embedded assignments, copy/scan the assignments, and forward them to the Program Director for program assessment. These assignments will be assessed using a faculty developed rubric by a faculty cohort. At the end of each year the results will be discussed in a program faculty meeting and actions (if necessary) taken. The samples then become artifacts that demonstrate achievement of Program and selected Student Learning Outcomes. Embedded assignments will be varied with the following characteristics: (1) multiple types of student work such as research papers, essay examinations, poster presentations, grant applications, articles for publication, seminar presentations, and oral defenses (videotapes); (2) individual and collaborative learning assignments; (3) electronic and print formats; (4) integrated and interdisciplinary application of learning; and (5) self reflection essays about applying student learning to educational reform in P 14 education. Written Qualifying Examination The required Written Qualifying Examination (critical essay) required of each doctoral student prior to his or her advancement to candidacy provides a direct assessment of student competence. The Doctoral Executive Council will conduct a comprehensive evaluation of a representative sample of qualifying examinations and discuss the results with the program faculty, along with any requisite adjustments for instructional effectiveness. The Rubric for Qualifying Examination and Advancement to Candidacy will be used.
3 Graduate Writing Proficiency Assignments Writing proficiency commensurate with doctoral education is expected to be evidenced in all assignments throughout the program. To assess this outcome, 20% of the students from each of the specializations will be randomly selected and their embedded course assignments (as described above) will also be analyzed for writing competency. While no student self assessment component is built into this system (as would be true with electronic student portfolios), the examination of student written work allows faculty to track student growth over the duration of the program. An external team of reviewers will rate types of writing and strength of writing on the continuum from program initiation to completion based on a rubric of criteria to be developed by the faculty. The external review team will be comprised of professors from doctoral granting universities and with expertise in rhetoric and the assessment of writing commensurate with doctoral education. Because graduate writing proficiency at the doctoral level requires advanced critical thought, the assessment of student writing proficiency will include the following: originality in conceptualizing and formulating the premise/thesis of the written communication; evidentiary and analytical basis for assertions; interdisciplinary perspectives toward topic; sophisticated analysis of the prior scholarship related to the research and explication of the connections to the current project; and the scholarly integration of theory, research, and practice as applicable to the topic. Special attention will be given to cross cultural communication and appropriateness for internal/external audiences. In addition, students will be judged on their demonstration of writing style characterized by clarity of expression, grammatical correctness, coherence, rhetorical sophistication, and analytical and creative expression. iskills Assessment Faculty will review student performance on the iskills assessment, formerly known as Advanced Information and Communication Technology Examination Literacy Assessment (ICTLA), a scenario, web based test of students cognitive information competencies and technical skills in accessing, evaluating, and using information. Graduate Record Examination Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scores are required as part of the admission criteria. Students overall performances on the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) will be reviewed to determine trends and comparison to national norms in the key areas of verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning, critical thinking, and analytical writing skills. Students needing assistance in any of the three areas will be advised of resources available to them for strengthening proficiencies in the relevent area(s). Student Focus Groups Program faculty will meet with students in focus groups to discuss program strengths, areas for improvement, and perceptions of student achievement of Student Learning Outcomes. Student Course Evaluations Doctoral courses will be evaluated using the University s existing student course evaluation system, the Individual and Education Assessment Student Evaluation of Courses (IDEA) developed by Kansas State University, referred to as IDEA. The IDEA student ratings of instruction system focus on student learning, tailored to fit each professor s identification of the most essential student learning outcomes from among 12 course objectives for the specific course. Examples include written proficiency, oral communication, and critical thinking.
4 Teaching effectiveness is determined by student progress on those goals chosen as ʺessentialʺ by the professor. Items on the IDEA instrument are based on research and results are interpreted by comparing to a national database. These date are used by the individual faculty for improvement of course quality and teaching effectiveness. Ratings are one element used by the Department, College, and University in evaluating faculty for retention, promotion, and tenure. This diagnostic tool allows an assessment of the congruence between faculty selections of course objectives and studentsʹ ratings of their achievement of these essential learning objectives. In addition, aggregate IDEA results for doctoral courses will be provided for review. Faculty will consider adding doctoral student or program learning goals to IDEA for the purpose of determining student ratings of the extent to which the course contributed to the achievement of these goals. Summative Assessment Dissertation Research The dissertation research is a highly individualized, rigorous experience developed for the student to demonstrate integrative thinking and achievement of Program Goals at the highest level. The dissertation is the most comprehensive direct assessment of student learning providing evidence of written expression, research methodology and data analysis, mastery of advanced disciplinary knowledge, critical and creative thinking, integration of theory and practice, and other elements related to the specific areas of specialization. A committee of two core doctoral faculty and one P 12 or community college educator serves as experts to determine student proficiency. The Proposal Rubric, the Review of Dissertation Chapters 1, 2, & 3 Rubric, and the Dissertation Rubric will be used to score the dissertation proposal and completed dissertation. Oral Defense of Dissertation Both the preliminary and final oral defense of the research dissertation will provide a mechanism for the faculty to assess oral expression, mastery of advanced disciplinary knowledge, research methodology, theoretical constructs, and critical and creative thinking. A rubric will be used to judge proficiency of the oral defenses. The Oral Defense of the Proposal Rubric and the Oral Defense of the Dissertation Rubric will be used. Graduate School Exit Survey The Graduate School Exit Survey will be administered annually at the time of graduation. The survey contains questions about students perceptions of their achievement of Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes, quality of the curriculum, faculty, library, facilities, learning and environment, and preparation for careers. Alumni Survey The Alumni Survey will be sent three years after students receipt of their degree. Alumni are asked to respond to questions about student learning outcomes, current employment, evaluation of program and faculty, preparation for their careers, and suggestions for improvement. To gauge the competitive preparation of graduate students for employment, data will be collected, including the percentage of graduate students successful in securing positions and advancing within their employment/profession consistent with their academic preparation and career goals. Employer Evaluations Biannually, an employer survey will be sent to employers of doctoral graduates. The employers assess the degree to which the program has prepared the graduates to be instructional leaders. Employers will be asked to provide specific examples of the positive effects of the graduates on reform efforts and
5 student achievement. Data derived from state and community college California Academic Performance Index will also be used to ascertain the leaders impact on P 14 student achievement. To be effective, the methods will be administered on a timeline designed to be manageable and sustainable. Two Student Learning Outcomes will be the assessment focused each semester, scheduled in such a way as to ensure that at least one element of each Program Goal is assessed every two years. A summary of when methods will be administered is displayed as Attachment 44, Timeline for Review of Assessment Data Table. Annually, the Program Director will present the findings and actions for program improvement at regular meetings of the Doctoral Executive Council, the College Executive Committee, and the Community Advisory Board so that program revisions can be considered as appropriate. The Program Director, faculty, and members of governance bodies may suggest curriculum or program changes based on the findings and their relationship to developments in research or professional practice. Also, the Program Director will prepare evaluation reports as mandated by the campus, the CSU, CCTC, and NCATE. B. Program Review Describe how and when this program will be incorporated into the department, school and institutionʹs regular assessment and program review processes. The Doctoral Program Director will serve as the Program Assessment Coordinator (PAC) for the Ed.D. program. PACs serve as campus leaders for the assessment of program quality. They attend assessment conferences and participate in faculty development workshops to stay current in assessment knowledge and skill. As a PAC, the Program Director will: Engage core and affiliated doctoral faculty in shared conversations about student learning and assessment; Develop and implement direct and indirect assessment methods appropriate for the program; Work with doctoral faculty to close the loop between what is found in the review process and instruction; Revise program goals and student learning outcomes, as needed; Revise curriculum and its delivery, as needed; Provide annual reports on the use of assessment data for posting on the University s website; and Attend monthly Assessment Council meetings with other PACs. One of the most systematic and comprehensive assessment of program quality and student learning goals occurs through academic program reviews. Components of academic program review for the doctoral program include a self study and action plan to be reviewed by college and university governance committees and administration. The current formal academic program review process will incorporate the doctoral program into its review cycle every 5 years and will include criteria related specifically to the assessment of the educational effectiveness of the doctoral program. The inclusion of external reviewers in this review cycle, under the direction of the CSU Stanislaus Office of Assessment and Quality Assurance, is described in the section that follows. The academic program review process is evaluative, not merely descriptive, based on a cycle of self inquiry, review, and a future oriented action plan for improvement. The assessment of Student Learning Outcomes is at the core of this review process. The Office of Institutional Research provides longitudinal data to assist in evidence based judgments and conclusions (e.g., enrollments, student faculty ratio, grade distributions, student survey data, staffing, and faculty research productivity in 21 categories).
6 CSU Stanislaus has three existing resources that will support the assessment of doctoral program quality and student learning: the Office of Assessment of Student Learning, the Office of Assessment and Quality Assurance, and the Office of Institutional Research: Office of Assessment of Student Learning The Office of Assessment of Student Learning is led by the Faculty Coordinator for the Assessment of Student Learning (FCASL). The primary role of the FCASL is to enhance student learning by working with faculty to support classroom teaching innovation, research investigations, and indirect and direct assessment that demonstrate student academic achievement. FCASL will support doctoral faculty in their assessment of Student Learning Outcomes in ways sustainable and manageable. In coordination with the Faculty Development Center, the FCASL will provide resources, workshops, and individual and program consultations to support doctoral student learning. This faculty leader chairs the Assessment Council, a forum for communicating information about effective methods for improving and assessing student learning, reviewing and encouraging the scholarship of teaching and assessment, and supporting the development and improvement of academic program assessment plans. These resources will be deployed to support the director of the doctoral program in the implementation of the program s assessment methods. Office of Assessment and Quality Assurance Led by the Associate Vice President, the Office of Assessment and Quality Assurance and the Assessment Leadership Team serve as resource support to academic and administrative units efforts to evaluate learning goals and implement recommended actions of operating in accordance with the University s principles for the assessment of student learning. The office will allocate funding for direct assessment initiatives in support of the doctoral program. Office of Institutional Research Led by the Director, the Office of Institutional Research provides on going assessment and evaluation of institutional effectiveness, including institutional data and analysis related to the assessment of student learning. This office is a key element of CSU Stanislausʹ commitment to the continuous improvement of the quality of studentsʹ learning experiences and one that supports a culture of evidence through which the University realizes excellence in its educational endeavors.
8 California State University, Stanislaus Doctor of Education (Ed.D.), Educational Leadership Flow Chart of the Program Assessment Process Attachment 42 Input from Constituents (Educators in P-12 Schools and Community Colleges, Faculty, Alumni and Students) Core Curricular Elements Program Goals Mission Student Learning Outcomes Assess/Evaluate Performance Curriculum Matrix Data Analysis Annual Findings Review Formative and Summative Assessment Outcome Improvement Actions Course and Other Learning Activities
9 California State University, Stanislaus Doctor of Education (Ed.D.), Educational Leadership Assessment Matrix Table Student Learning Outcomes and Methods Attachment 43 Student Learning Outcomes Visionary Leadership Teaching and Learning Program Evaluation Applied Research Assessment of Student Work (Embedded Assessment) Written Qualifying Examination Graduate Writing Proficiency Assignments Formative iskills Assessment Graduate Record Examination Student Focus Groups Student Course Evaluations Evaluations of Course Syllabi Dissertation Research Oral Defense of Dissertation Summative Graduate School Exit Survey Alumni Survey Employer Evaluations Academic Program Review External Review Meta-Review of Dissertation Research Meta-Review of Oral Defense of Dissertation External Review of Embedded Assessments and Examinations "" indicates the Student Learning Outcomes the assessment activity will measure.
10 California State University, Stanislaus Doctor of Education (Ed.D.), Educational Leadership Timeline for Review of Assessment Data Table Attachment 44 Academic Year 2008/ / / / / / /15 Assessment of Student Work (Embedded Assessment) Written Qualifying Examination Graduate Writing Proficiency Assignments Formative iskills Assessment Graduate Record Examination Student Focus Groups Student Course Evaluations Evaluations of Course Syllabi Dissertation Research Oral Defense of Dissertation Summative Graduate School Exit Survey Alumni Survey Employer Evaluations Academic Program Review Meta-Review of Dissertation Research External Review Meta-Review of Oral Defense of Dissertation External Review of Embedded Assessments and Examinations Faculty Quality Accreditation by NCATE/CCTC
California State University, Stanislaus GENERAL EDUCATION: ASSESSMENT CHRONOLOGY The General Education Program has taken the following steps toward assessment of the quality of General Education. 1997/1998
Draft Policy on Graduate Education Preface/Introduction Over the past two decades, the number and types of graduate programs have increased dramatically. In particular, the development of clinical master
Higher Education Dickinson Hall, Room 419 (501) 569-3267 Master of Arts and Doctor of Education The Master of Arts in Higher Education is designed for those individuals who are interested in entering or
Student Outcomes Assessment Plan (SOAP) I. Mission Statement CSM Psychology, BS The mission of the Department of Psychology is to provide quality instruction in behavioral science to the students of California
MSU Departmental Assessment Plan 2009 2010 Department: Education Department Head: Dr. Joanne Erickson Assessment Coordinator: Bill Freese 214 Reid Hall 994 3072 Degrees/Majors/Options Offered by Department
STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT SUBMITTED BY: C.KOPAC AND M. VENZKE DATE: JUNE 26, 2014 REVISED JANUARY 2015 TO MEET UAC RECOMMENDATIONS SEE BELOW- HEADING HIGHLIGHTED IN GREY BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE
Assessment Plan PhD in English & Comparative Literature, University of Cincinnati March 2015 Program Overview: Graduate studies in English at the University of Cincinnati began in 1906, and by 1913, the
The School of Education & Human Services The University of Michigan Flint Standards and Criteria for Promotion and Tenure Introduction The primary mission of the University of Michigan Flint is to be the
Doctor of Education Program Handbook Student Copy Revised Summer 2013 1 Introduction The Johns Hopkins University (JHU) School of Education (SOE) attracts the most innovative and progressive scholars without
A Guide to Assessment of Learning Outcomes for ACEJMC Accreditation Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communications, 2012 This guide explains ACEJMC s expectations of an assessment
2011 MASTER PLAN/PROGRESS REPORT Academic Program: School Counseling, M.Ed Person Responsible: Dr. Christine Anthony Date Submitted: May 9, 2012 Mission: The Master of Education in School Counseling endeavors
DOCTORAL DEGREE IN EDUCATION Ed.D. Leadership in Schooling ADMITTING FOR SUMMER 2016 ONWARDS Ed.D. Leadership in Schooling 42 credits 3-4 years Leadership in Schooling Faculty Michaela Colombo, Associate
Northern Illinois University Report to the University Assessment Panel Fall 2007 Program: EdD in Instructional Technology The Doctor of Education program in Instructional Technology prepares students to
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY STANISLAUS GRADUATE LEVEL ACADEMIC CULTURE WASC STANDARDS GRADUATE ACADEMIC CULTURE The Graduate Council reviewed the WASC Standards, Criteria for Review, and Guidelines, specifically
PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PREPARATION OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERS (School Building Leadership Level) Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC) Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC) COVER SHEET
Student Outcomes Assessment Plan (SOAP) I. Mission Statement Department of Political Science College of Social Science Undergraduate Bachelor s Degree in Political Science The Department of Political Science
DOCTOR OF ARTS (DA) DEGREE IN BIOLOGY Requirements The Doctor of Arts degree in Biological Sciences is granted for proven ability and scholarly attainment in biological science instruction. The program
NEW PROGRAM PROPOSAL College: [ Eisner College of Education ] New Program Proposal Page 1/13 Department: [ Educational Leadership and Policy Studies ] 1. Title of Proposed Program: (e.g. B.S. in, Option
DOCTORAL DEGREE IN EDUCATION Ed.D. Leadership in Schooling Option: STEM Education ADMITTING FOR SUMMER 2016 ONWARDS Ed.D. Leadership in Schooling 42 credits 3-4 years Leadership in Schooling Faculty Michaela
The Graduate School: A Model to Enhance Quantity and Quality in PhD Production Maresi Nerad South African PhD Panel Report October 2009 South Africa s universities are confronted with two major challenges.
University of Northern Iowa College of Business Administration Master of Business Administration Learning Assurance Program Last updated April 2009 1. Philosophy and Program Goals The MBA program s Learning
Kean University ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW GUIDELINES Overview Program review is an ongoing process involving the faculty and others concerned with the particular academic program. The guidelines established
Background Manship School of Mass Communication Annual Report on Mass Communication Graduate Student Learning Assessment May 30, 2011 Amy Reynolds, Associate Dean, Graduate Studies & Research The Manship
GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS (Effective 9/01/08) Kelly Henson Executive Secretary Table of Contents Standard 1: Candidate Knowledge,
Higher Education Review Unit Programme Review Report Master of Business Administration AMA International University-Bahrain Kingdom of Bahrain Date Reviewed: 26-27 October 2011 Table of Contents 1. The
Science Education Doctoral Program Curriculum and Instruction (Ph.D. or Ed.D) Admission Requirements 1. Submit a complete Graduate School application 2. Master's degree 3. Grade point average of 3. 0 or
Plan 7-30-12 1 Professional Education Unit Assessment System School of Education and Child Development Drury University Overview and Goals The PEU assessment system is designed to facilitate collection
Program Report for the Preparation of Elementary School Teachers Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) 2007 Standards - Option A NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCATION
1. Introduction Unit Mission Statement: The University of Kentucky College of Nursing (CON) PhD in Nursing develops nursing scholars who are prepared to create new knowledge that fosters the health and
Graduate Degree Program Assessment Plan Cover Sheet (rev. 07): UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK Plan No. 7 Degree Program: Department and College: Ed.D. - Educational Administration and Supervision
1 M.S. in Criminal Justice Program Assessment Plan October 2007 Mission Statement of the Division of Criminology, Criminal Justice and Social Policy: The Division of Criminology, Criminal Justice and Social
LLED Doctoral Program Requirements Students are responsible for information on the Graduate School website. See, especially the Graduate Bulletin and the Graduate School s Academic Regulations & Procedures
Annual Goals for Social Work 2010-2011 Description: Re-affirmation of Accreditation by the Council on Social Work Education i. Faculty will complete the self-study process in preparation for Reaffirmation
Graduate Program Assessment Plan Mission: The mission of the master of science program is to promote critical thinking and creative skills based on the theory, principles, and techniques of electrical.
Appendix A Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards A new Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards has been approved by the CSWE Board of Directors in April 2008. Preamble Social work practice
of Student Learning Annual Report (Due May 20 to firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com ). /Department: Date: Mission learning outcomes (also included in the assessment plan). Please
2. Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards Preamble Social work practice promotes human well-being by strengthening opportunities, resources, and capacities of people in their environments and by
Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards Copyright 2001, Council on Social Work Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Sections renumbered December 2001, released April 2002, corrected May 2002, July
WASHBURN UNIVERSITY DUAL DEGREE PROGRAM School of Law (J.D.) & School of Business (M.B.A.) Recognizing that legal and business studies complement each other and that real-world problems often require solutions
Academic Program Assessment Plan Graduate Programs Hasan School of Business CSU-Pueblo Identification This is the assessment plan for graduate programs at the Hasan School of Business (HSB) at Colorado
Program Personnel Standards Approval Form Disciplrne: Nursing ','J1* )lplll RTP Committeehair Date i Introduction Relationship of Discipline Standards to CSU Channel Islands Program Standards To understand
Masters of Arts in Education, Early Childhood Education Option Kremen School of Education and Human Development STUDENT OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN (SOAP) I. Mission Statement Empower Early Childhood Education
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY Professional Education Unit ASSESSMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK 2011/2012 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNIT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK Table of Contents The Unit Assessment System Overview...
RYERSON UNIVERSITY POLICY OF SENATE PERIODIC PROGRAM REVIEW OF GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS Policy Number 126 Previous Approvals: April 5, 2005; May 6, 2008; November 2, 2010; May 3, 2011, May 3,
GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPING JOINT DOCTORAL PROGRAMS WITH INDEPENDENT INSTITUTIONS These procedures are based on documents developed by the CSU and California Postsecondary Education Commission (CPEC)
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY School of Applied Health and Educational Psychology Ph.D. Program in Educational Psychology Program Description for Educational Psychology Option School Mission The mission of
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES PLAN Undergraduate and Graduate Programs DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK Introduction Our Student Outcomes Plan begins with our department s mission which is linked to the university
PROGRAM HANDBOOK Doctor of Education Higher Education (Online Delivery) College of Education Graduate Education and Research Texas Tech University Box 41071 Lubbock, TX 79409-1071 Effective 2015-2016 1
CSU Chico Educational Leadership and Administration Program Summary Program Design The Educational Leadership and Administration Program is located in the School of Education under the leadership of the
Graduate Programs in Education and Human Development Department of Curriculum and Instruction Two master s degree options and a doctorate degree are offered in Curriculum and Instruction. The Master of
METROPOLITAN COLLEGE Goals and Student Assessment Outcomes Measures for Graduate Degree Programs TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview... 3 Degrees Master of Arts in Human Resource Management. 4-10 Human Resource
1 Faculty of Nursing Master s Project Manual For Faculty Supervisors and Students January 2014 2 Table of Contents Overview of the Revised MN Streams in Relation to Project 3 The Importance of Projects
September 2012 and s: Undergraduate Academic Programs (Non-Accredited) Accounting 1) The knowledge and tools needed to obtain meaningful employment and have successful careers directly or indirectly involving
CTL 2009 ADVANCED PROGRAM REPORT 1 Because the Office of Undergraduate Studies is now requiring program assessment reports that are similar to CTL program assessment reports; The Office of Research, Evaluation,
Council for Standards in Human Service Education National Standards MASTER S DEGREE IN HUMAN SERVICES http://www.cshse.org 2013 (2010, 2009) I. GENERALPROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS A. Institutional Requirements
Approved by Academic Affairs May 2010 DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP) I. DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING RTP POLICY A. Preamble B.
GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DOCTORAL PROGRAMS IN EDUCATION GRADUATE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT ANNUAL REPORT FALL 2011 Submitted by Dr. Cynthia Kolsun, Program Coordinator firstname.lastname@example.org
Third Year Report: Graduate Education Programs Assessment contact person, and person preparing the report, (if different): o Department Head for Professional Education Services (formerly special education,
Department of Management and Systems 2101 Systems Building Norfolk, VA 23529 (757) 683-4558 Adrian Gheorghe, Chair M. Pilar Pazos, Graduate Program Director, Master's Programs Andres Sousa-Poza, Graduate
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION Educational Leadership Technology Online www.hsu.edu The HSU Master of Science in Education (M.S.E.) in educational leadership and technology as well as building level leader
Proposal for Education Specialist Degree (Ed.S.) in School Psychology Department of Education and Allied Studies John Carroll University I. Purpose of the Proposed Educational Specialist (Ed.S.) Degree
KNPE/M.S. Sport Management Assessment 1 2013 Review of the MS in Sport Management PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Master of Science in Sport Management degree is designed to prepare students for a management career
Job Description JOB INFORMATION JOB TITLE: Program Director OFFICE: Graduate Nurse Anesthesia LOCATION: SGPP Minneapolis JOB GRADE: JOB CATEGORY: Professional FLSA: Exempt REPORTS TO: School or Academic
V1.5 July 8, 2013 Doctorate in Occupational Therapy (OTD) Program Program Guide A.T. Still University Home of the world s first osteopathic medical school, established in 1892, A.T. Still University is
COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS AND DESIGN Department of Art Education and Art History Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Art Education A Ph.D. in art education gives one the opportunity to achieve a high level of
PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES Rubric for Assessing the Quality of Academic Program Learning Outcomes Criterion Initial Emerging Developed Highly Developed The list of outcomes is The list includes reasonable
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ Education Department, Ph.D. Program Ph.D. Program in Education We prepare leading scholars and educators who engage in research focused on needs of students from linguistic
CGS Assessment Report: MBA Program 2013-2014 Table of Contents Assessment Process Overview... 2 Assessment Report... 4 Assessment Process... 4 Results: Direct Measures of Student learning... 5 Results:
Construction Management Program LYLES COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Student Outcomes Assessment Plan (Soap) CTRL + CLICK TO VIEW EXAMPLE I. Mission Statement During the 2010-2011 Academic Year, the Construction
QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR PHD PROGRAMS IN SOCIAL WORK Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education in Social Work (GADE) APPROVED APRIL, 2013 GADE Task Force on Quality Guidelines, appointed by GADE Chair
Review Process for Proposals for CSU and UC JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS Doctoral Program Proposal Resources CSU Ed.D. Programs http://www.calstate.edu/app/edd/ UC-CSU Joint Doctoral Programs http://www.calstate.edu/app/documents/joint-docs-overview.pdf
Doctoral Degree Programs in Special Education University of Florida College of Education School of Special Education, School Psychology, & Early Childhood Studies P.O. Box 117050 / 1403 Norman Hall Gainesville,
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges Report on College Implementation of SLO Assessment The current Accreditation Standards were approved
Advantages and Disadvantages of Various Assessment Methods 1. Standardized Exams (Commercial) Advantages Convenient Can be adopted and implemented quickly. Reduces or eliminates faculty time demands in
INSTITUTIONAL ACCREDITATION SELF STUDY GUIDE INTRODUCTION Degree granting institutions in New York State may designate the New York State Board of Regents and the Commissioner of Education as their nationally
Guidelines for Massachusetts Early Educator Preparation Programs Participating in the Early Childhood Educator Scholarships Program Background The Departments of Higher Education and Early Education and
Business Psychology Department 2014 2015 Program Guidebook PhD Business Psychology (IO and Consulting Track) MA Industrial/Organizational Psychology (Internship, Thesis, and ARP Tracks) PhD Organizational
Master of Business Administration FY 2015 Enrollment: 885; Graduate: 101 Program Educational Objectives As an Excelsior College Master's level business graduate, within a few years of graduation, you are
1 Social Work Program Outcomes 2009 2010 2 The 2008 Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS) identified by the Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) include a provision for assessment of
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.