COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Appeal No. 44 OF 2013

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Appeal No. 44 OF 2013"

Transcription

1 COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Appeal No. 44 OF 2013 [Under Section 53-B of the Competition Act, 2002 against the Order dated passed by the Competition Commission of India in Combination Registration No. C-2013/05/2012] With CORAM I.A. No. 81/2013 Hon ble Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar, Hon ble Shri Rahul Sarin Hon ble Ms. Pravin Tripathi In the matter of : Jitender Bhargava Versus Competition Commission of India & Ors. Appellant Respondents Appearances : Shri Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Shri Srinivas Katni, Shri Mukul Chandra, Shri Pradeep and Shri Arunab, Advocates for the Appellant. Dr. Vijay K. Singh with Shri V. Sriraj, DD(Law) of Respondent No. 1/CCI. Ms. Mrinal, Advocatre for Respondent No. 2. Shri Rajashekhar Rao with Shri Abir Roy and Ms. Shruti Aji Murali,, Advocates for Respondent No. 3. O R D E R 9 th January, 2014 Learned counsel, Ms. Mrinal and Shri Rajashekhar Rao, accept Notice on behalf of respondents Nos. 2 and 3 respectively and pray for time to file their respective replies. Let the same be filed within two weeks from today and copies thereof shall be exchanged. Rejoinder, if any, shall be filed within a week thereafter. List the matter on 10 th February, 2014 for hearing on merits as well as on interim relief application. [Justice V.S. Sirpurkar) [Rahul Sarin] [Pravin Tripathi]

2 COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Appeal No. 30 OF 2013 [Under Section 53-B of the Competition Act, 2002 against the Order dated passed by the Competition Commission of India in Case No.47/2012] With I.A. No. 53 of 2013 CORAM Hon ble Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar, Hon ble Shri Rahul Sarin Hon ble Ms. Pravin Tripathi In the matter of : M/s. Mineral Enterprises Ltd. Versus Competition Commission of India & Ors. Appellant Respondents Appearances : Shri P.S. Narasimha, Senior Advocate with Shri K. Maruthi Rao, Advocate for the Appellant. Dr. Vijay K. Singh with Shri V. Sriraj, DD(Law) of Respondent No. 1/CCI. Shri V.S. R. Krishna, Advocate for the Respondents. O R D E R 9 th January, 2014 At the request of the learned counsel for the respondents, three weeks time is granted to file reply to the application for condonation of delay. List the matter on 3 rd February, [Justice V.S. Sirpurkar) [Rahul Sarin] [Pravin Tripathi]

3 COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Appeal No. 31 OF 2013 [Under Section 53-B of the Competition Act, 2002 against the Order dated passed by the Competition Commission of India in Case No.49/2012] With I.A. No. 54 of 2013 CORAM Hon ble Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar, Hon ble Shri Rahul Sarin Hon ble Ms. Pravin Tripathi In the matter of : N. Sanjeeva Rao & Anr. Appellants Versus Competition Commission of India & Ors. Respondents Appearances : Shri Rakesh Sanghi with Shri T.S.R. Prasad, Advocates for the Appellants. O R D E R 9 th January, 2014 Being aggrieved by the order dated passed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) closing the proceedings under that Section, the appellant have come before us by way of an appeal under Section 53-B of the Act. From the record, it appears that the appellants had taken auto finance services from the Opposite Parties Nos. 3, 4 and 5 before the CCI. The appellants have joined as many as 163 auto finance business firms as the respondents. According to the appellants, all these respondents are the s of a registered Association called the Andhra Pradesh Hire Purchase Association and it is in that capacity that they have

4 -2- been joined as parties to this appeal as also before the CCI. It is then made out that these opponents were controlling 60% of the entire auto-finance services market in the cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad and that they were acting in violation of the provisions of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Money Lender s Act, 1349 Fasli. It is made out that under that Act, a person, individual or the partnership firm, conducting money lending business, had to obtain Money Lender s Licence. It is then contended that all these Opposite Parties were also acting in violation of the provisions contained in the Usurious Loans Act, 1918, which regulated the charging of interest by the Opposite Parties. It was then contended that the Opposite Parties had created a flimsy smoke screen by falsely describing their auto finance business as a Hire Purchase transaction. It was, however, made out that the Opposite Parties Nos. 31, 37, 39, 45, 47, 48, 60 and 90 before the CCI, being corporate entities, did not require the Money Lender s Licence to conduct the money-lending business but the interest which was being charged by them was bound to be regulated as per the provisions contained in the Usurious Loans Act, It was also complained that these entities unilaterally calculated the outstanding amount due and, on default, the financier s goons proceeded to seize the vehicle from the loanee without a court order. It was also complained that the s of the Association used to sell the hypothecated vehicles without a court decree by adopting a uniform business practice of obtaining various blank signed

5 -3- documents including signed blank cheques, transfer forms and number of other documents from the loanee at the time of execution of documents while disbursing the loan amount. 2. It was contended that the members claimed that they were conducting Hire-Purchase business and, according to the informants, this was a false declaration. A Model Hire-Purchase Agreement was also filed by the Association in the writ petition which is pending before the Andhra Pradesh High Court. According to the appellants, the transaction covered by that Model Hire- Purchase Agreement was nothing but a loan agreement. It was only a facade that a loan agreement was called the Hire-Purchase Agreement by the Opponents. 3. On this basis, it was urged that the s of the Association had entered into an agreement or understanding to carry on the illegalities in the course of auto finance business under the garb of Hire Purchase transaction which directly determined the price of services being rendered by the private financers in the automobile finance market and thus it was alleged that the Opposite Parties Nos. 2 to 163 had formed a cartel and constituted a single entity i.e. their association, which was Opposite Party No. 1. On that basis, the informants made the following prayers : a) To pass an Order to restrain the OP-2 to OP-163 (except 31, 37, 39, 45, 47, 48, 60, 90) from carrying on auto finance business and direct OP-31, 37, 39, 45, 47, 48, 60, 90 to carry on their business in compliance with the provisions contained in the A.P. (T.A.) Money Lenders Act, 1349;

6 -4- b) To pass an order directing the Opposite Parties to charge reasonable interest as per the provisions contained in the Usurious Loan Act, 1918; c) To pass an order restraining the Opposite Party from seizing or, snatching the Hypothecated vehicle from the consumers except through the procedure established by the law; and d) Any other order which the Commission may deem fit. 4. The Commission considered the material on record and also heard the advocates on behalf of the informants. According to the CCI, the market was the finance services rendered for automobile finance. The CCI came to the conclusion that there was no separate category or a market within a market called Auto-finance by nonbanking entities and there was no basis to differentiate between private auto financers and other banking/non-banking entities which were in the business of extending automobile finance. The Commission explained that the relevant product market in the present matter would be the services of automobile finance and the geographic market would be restricted to the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad in the State of Andhra Pradesh. 5. It was further observed by the CCI that the informants had not brought on record anything to show that there was an agreement among the Opposite Parties to charge exorbitant rates of interest for providing automobile finance services. The Commission, in its order, referred to the grievance of the appellants about the contravention of the provisions of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Money Lender s Act, 1349 Fasli and the Usurious Loans Act, According to the CCI, this

7 -5- did not raise any competition issue and the remedy, therefore, lied elsewhere. It was noted by the CCI that there was already a writ petition pending in the Andhra Pradesh High Court and filing of the writ petition by the Opposite Party No. 1 Association could not mean to be an agreement amongst all the members thereof. 6. From this, CCI came to the conclusion that there was no material on record to hold that there was any agreement amongst the Opposite Parties much less an agreement contravening the provisions of Section 3 of the Competition Act. 7. Before us, the learned counsel for the appellants very strenuously argued that forming of an association and creating a Model Hire Purchase Agreement by itself amounted to an agreement amongst all the Opposite Parties. According to the learned counsel for the appellants, this was nothing but cartelling. We do not think that the learned counsel for the appellants is right in this contention as for alleging cartelization, much more material would be required, which has not been placed by him either before the CCI or before us. Learned counsel for the appellants says that there is a Model Hire Purchase Agreement and that by itself would be sufficient to infer that there was an agreement amongst all the Opposite Parties. In our opinion, that by itself will not go to the extent of creating a cartel like agreement prosecuted under Section 3 of the Competition Act. In fact, it appears to us that in the name of raising a competition issue by the appellants, this is nothing but an attempt to get their

8 -6- grievance redressed in respect of the complaint against the Hire Purchasers like the Opposite Parties in this case. We are quite convinced that there was no competition issue involved and issue in reality only relates to the prosecutions of the Opposite Parties under the provisions of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Money Lender s Act, 1349 and the Usurious Loans Act, 1918, which they have challenged before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. That issue has got nothing to do with the competition concern. It is also not suggested as to which particular provision of Section 3 of the Competition Act is breached by the Model Hire Purchase Agreement. We have absolutely no material to examine as to whether all the respondents follow that Model Hire Purchase Agreement. There is no evidence to that effect nor any material was placed on record before the CCI or before us. It is also not known as to whether the Association has any control over the concerned members. In view of this, we are unable to take any different view than the one taken by the CCI. In our opinion, the order of CCI is correctly passed and it was correctly held that there was no competition issue involved. The present appeal is, therefore, dismissed. [Justice V.S. Sirpurkar) [Rahul Sarin] [Pravin Tripathi]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.8463 OF 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26308 of 2013) Narinder Singh Appellant (s) Versus New

More information

Before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction)

Before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction) Before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction) Appeal Nos. 166 of 2011, 150 of 2011, 168 of 2011, 172 of 2011, 173 of 2011, 09 of 2012 & I.A. No. 14 of 2012, 18 of 2012, 29 of 2012,

More information

v/s. Western India Art Litho Works Pvt. Ltd.

v/s. Western India Art Litho Works Pvt. Ltd. 1 cp1096.2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 1096 of 2000 Solar Printing Inks v/s. Western India Art Litho Works Pvt. Ltd....Petitioner...Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI SCHOOL EDUCATION ACT, 1973 Date: 1st May, 2013 W.P.(C) 8060/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI SCHOOL EDUCATION ACT, 1973 Date: 1st May, 2013 W.P.(C) 8060/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI SCHOOL EDUCATION ACT, 1973 Date: 1st May, 2013 W.P.(C) 8060/2007 SATBIR SINGH & ANR Through Mr. Akash Tyagi, Adv.... Petitioners versus DELHI SIKH

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2013 Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2013 Central Bank of India and others...petitioners

More information

ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION 4 th & 5 th Floors, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad-500 004. O.P.No.

ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION 4 th & 5 th Floors, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad-500 004. O.P.No. Between ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION 4 th & 5 th Floors, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad-500 004 O.P.No. 17 of 2009 Dated: 18.06.2011 Present Sri A. Raghotham Rao, Chairman Sri

More information

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI 1 COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 116 OF 2012 [Under Section 53-B of the Competition Act, 2002 against the order dated 03.07.2012 passed by the Competition Commission of India in Case

More information

AUTOMART LIMITED V. WAQA ROKOTUINASAU - ERCA NO. 9 OF 2012 JUDGMENT

AUTOMART LIMITED V. WAQA ROKOTUINASAU - ERCA NO. 9 OF 2012 JUDGMENT IN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COURT AT SUVA APPELLATE JURISDICTION CASE NUMBER: ERCA NO. 09 OF 2012 BETWEEN: AUTOMART LIMITED APPELLANT AND: WAQA ROKOTUINASAU RESPONDENT Appearances: Ms. Drova for the Appellant.

More information

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar.

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Page 1 HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Present :- Shri T.K.Bhattacharjee, A.J.S. Addl. District Judge, Cachar,Silchar.

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA 24/2004 MC 1482/04 1. Shri Manik Chakraborty Son of Late Bijoy Chakraborty, R/o Rangapara Town, Ward No.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT ; SERVICE MATTER. Judgment delivered on: 10.03.2014. W.P.(C) 2656/2013 and CM No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT ; SERVICE MATTER. Judgment delivered on: 10.03.2014. W.P.(C) 2656/2013 and CM No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT ; SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: 10.03.2014 W.P.(C) 2656/2013 and CM No.5029/2013 (stay) ABHISHEK YADAV... PETITIONER VERSUS ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER. Decided on: 02nd March, 2015 MAC.APP. 38/2014 MAC.APP.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER. Decided on: 02nd March, 2015 MAC.APP. 38/2014 MAC.APP. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER Decided on: 02nd March, 2015 MAC.APP. 38/2014 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth Gaur, Advocate.. Appellant versus

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT, 1956 Reserved on: 25th November, 2013 Date of Decision:21st January, 2014 CO. APPL. 1261/2007 IN CO. PET. 354/2001 REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES

More information

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI. Petition No. 7/MP/2013

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI. Petition No. 7/MP/2013 CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI Petition No. 7/MP/2013 Coram: Dr. Pramod Deo, Chairperson Shri V.S.Verma, Member Shri M.Deena Dayalan, Member In the matter of Date of Hearing: 14.3.2013

More information

HIGH COURT FORM NO.(J) 2. HEADING OF JUDGMENT ON ORIGINAL APPEAL. IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, SONITPUR AT TEZPUR. MONEY APPEAL NO.

HIGH COURT FORM NO.(J) 2. HEADING OF JUDGMENT ON ORIGINAL APPEAL. IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, SONITPUR AT TEZPUR. MONEY APPEAL NO. Page 1 of 9 District : Sonitpur. HIGH COURT FORM NO.(J) 2. HEADING OF JUDGMENT ON ORIGINAL APPEAL. IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, SONITPUR AT TEZPUR. Present : Sri M.K. Kalita, AJS, District Judge,

More information

$~S.B.-1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + LPA 804/2014 & C.M.No.21003 /2014 (stay) Versus

$~S.B.-1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + LPA 804/2014 & C.M.No.21003 /2014 (stay) Versus $~S.B.-1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:12.08.2015 + LPA 804/2014 & C.M.No.21003 /2014 (stay) BAYER CORPORATION... Appellant. Through: Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sanjay

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) 2343 of 2014) Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) 2343 of 2014) Versus Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3645 OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) 2343 of 2014) Central Bank of India Appellant Versus Jagbir Singh Respondent

More information

Dated this the 10 th day of July 2014. Before. Miscellaneous First Appeal No.21322/2008 (MV)

Dated this the 10 th day of July 2014. Before. Miscellaneous First Appeal No.21322/2008 (MV) : 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Dated this the 10 th day of July 2014 Before THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR Miscellaneous First Appeal No.21322/2008 (MV) Between The United

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act. Date of Decision : December 03, 2008. WP(C) No.6406 of 2007.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act. Date of Decision : December 03, 2008. WP(C) No.6406 of 2007. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act Date of Decision : December 03, 2008 WP(C) No.6406 of 2007 Sh. Jawahar Singh. Petitioner Through : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Advocate

More information

District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR.

District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. 1 High Court Form No.(J)3. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN THE APPEAL. District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. PRESENT : Sri A.K.Das, District Judge, Lakhimpur, North

More information

FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 / 2009. 1. Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Mall Road, Kanpur

FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 / 2009. 1. Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Mall Road, Kanpur STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UTTARAKHAND DEHRADUN FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 / 2009 1. Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Mall Road, Kanpur 2. Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance

More information

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Dated : October 23, 2012. Petition No.720(C) of 2012. Asergis Telecom Services Pvt. Ltd.

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Dated : October 23, 2012. Petition No.720(C) of 2012. Asergis Telecom Services Pvt. Ltd. TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Dated : October 23, 2012 Petition No.720(C) of 2012 Asergis Telecom Services Pvt. Ltd. Petitioner Vs. Bharti Airtel Ltd. & Anr. Respondent BEFORE:

More information

Consumer Complaint No. 74 of 2009. Tajinder Kumar Taneja, S/o Late Sh. Ram Saran Dass, Opposite State

Consumer Complaint No. 74 of 2009. Tajinder Kumar Taneja, S/o Late Sh. Ram Saran Dass, Opposite State 2 nd Additional Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint No. 74 of 2009 Date of institution: 22.9.2009 Date of Decision: 1.11.2013

More information

MONEY SUIT NO. 249/2000

MONEY SUIT NO. 249/2000 HIGH COURT FORM NO. (J) 2. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT DISTRICT : KAMRUP. IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE NO. 3, KAMRUP, GUWAHATI. PRESENT : SHRI S.N. SARMA, LLM,, AJS, Civil Judge No. 3, Kamrup,

More information

On behalf of the Respondents, the following were present in person:

On behalf of the Respondents, the following were present in person: Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/002332 File No. CIC/SH/C/2015/000462 Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (18)/ (19) Date of hearing : 28th March 2016 Date

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS WITH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS WITH 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD....APPELLANT VERSUS HILLI MULTIPURPOSE COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD...RESPONDENT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5669 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.9516 of 2010) VERSUS JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5669 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.9516 of 2010) VERSUS JUDGMENT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5669 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.9516 of 2010) The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS Siby George

More information

BAIL AND REMAND. Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article

BAIL AND REMAND. Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article 1 BAIL AND REMAND Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Since we are governed by the rule of law, freedom of every individual within the

More information

3 M/s Network Travels (Owner of above vehicle) Opp Parties

3 M/s Network Travels (Owner of above vehicle) Opp Parties 1 COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL NO. I KAMRUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- B J Mahanta Member, MACT-I Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case No. 872 of 2012 Sri Anil Prasad Claimant Versus 1 M/s New India Assurance

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant: Respondent: Shri Suraj Prakash, United India Insurance Co. Decision Announced

More information

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA. First Appeal No: 256/2014. Date of Presentation: 17.07.2014. Date of Decision: 17.11.2014.

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA. First Appeal No: 256/2014. Date of Presentation: 17.07.2014. Date of Decision: 17.11.2014. H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA. First Appeal No: 256/2014. Date of Presentation: 17.07.2014. Date of Decision: 17.11.2014. 1. Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Limited, Regd.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. IA No.991/2004, 6906/2005 & CS(OS)No.1710/2001 RESERVED ON : 07-07-2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. IA No.991/2004, 6906/2005 & CS(OS)No.1710/2001 RESERVED ON : 07-07-2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IA No.991/2004, 6906/2005 & CS(OS)No.1710/2001 RESERVED ON : 07-07-2006 DATE OF DECISION: 02-08-2006 Atul Anand... Plaintiff Through

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014 GURCHARAN SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. N.K. Gupta, Advocate versus

More information

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: T C NAIR, WHOLE TIME MEMBER

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: T C NAIR, WHOLE TIME MEMBER WTM/TCN/01 /CFD/ APRIL /08 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: T C NAIR, WHOLE TIME MEMBER IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC OFFER FOR ACQUISITION OF 103,88,445 OF THE EQUITY SHARE CAPITAL OF JAGATJIT

More information

The Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005 1

The Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005 1 Disclaimer : Text of this Act/Bill/Rules is provided for information only. We undertake no responsibility for any errors/mistakes in the same. Please refer to the Gazette of India for the authentic text.

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067 Tel: +91-11-26105682. File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001995/RM

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067 Tel: +91-11-26105682. File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001995/RM CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067 Tel: +91-11-26105682 File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/001995/RM Appellant: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, New Delhi Public

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION B- Wing, 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110066 PARTIES TO THE CASE: Appeal No.CIC/SS/A/2011/001364 Appellant : Ms. Iqbal Kaur (represented

More information

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. DISTRICT COURT SIXTH DIVISION THOMAS A. PALANGIO D/B/A : CONSUMER AUTO SALES : : v. : A.A. No. 11-093 : DAVID M. SULLIVAN, TAX : ADMINISTRATOR

More information

DISPUTES SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA & CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER THE TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1997

DISPUTES SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA & CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER THE TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1997 DISPUTES SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA & CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER THE TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT, 1997 BY RAMJI SRINIVASAN Advocate INTRODUCTION The protection of consumer

More information

258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Versus. Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakshi, Addl. AG, Haryana.

258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Versus. Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakshi, Addl. AG, Haryana. 258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-6003 of 2015 Date of decision:march 10, 2015 Swati and others State of Haryana Versus... Petitioners... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE

More information

BEFORE THE MEMBER OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL;DHEMAJI. Present : Shri L. Hazarika, B.A. (Hons), LL.B., M.A.C.T. CASE NO. 15/2010.

BEFORE THE MEMBER OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL;DHEMAJI. Present : Shri L. Hazarika, B.A. (Hons), LL.B., M.A.C.T. CASE NO. 15/2010. 1 BEFORE THE MEMBER OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL;DHEMAJI. Present : Shri L. Hazarika, B.A. (Hons), LL.B., M.A.C.T. CASE NO. 15/2010. Claimants :- (1) Smti Mileswari Borpatragohain, W/O Lt. Durgeswar

More information

BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. IVD-ID7/AL- RG/AO/DRK-AKS/EAD3-394/60-2013] UNDER SECTION 15 I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT,

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.382/2015 Date of Reserve: 07.09.2015 Date of Decision: 18.09.2015. versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.382/2015 Date of Reserve: 07.09.2015 Date of Decision: 18.09.2015. versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.382/2015 Date of Reserve: 07.09.2015 Date of Decision: 18.09.2015 DEEPAK BHATIA Through:... Petitioner Mr.Randhir Jain and Mr.Dhananjai Jain, Advocates.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DEFAMATION Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006 NEMICHAND JAIN ALIAS CHANDRA SWAMI... Petitioner Through Mr. K.K. Sud, Sr.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923. FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923. FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008 DATE OF DECISION 19.03.2008 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.... Through: Appellant

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF LESOTHO. (Commercial Division) NEDBANK LESOTHO LIMITED. TSELISO CLOVIS MANYELI t/a COPY SHOP JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF LESOTHO. (Commercial Division) NEDBANK LESOTHO LIMITED. TSELISO CLOVIS MANYELI t/a COPY SHOP JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF LESOTHO (Commercial Division) CCT/42/2010 In the matter between:- NEDBANK LESOTHO LIMITED APPLICANT And TSELISO CLOVIS MANYELI t/a COPY SHOP RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Coram : Honourable

More information

Bench: A Bhangale IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 467 /2009. Smt.Nanda w/o Dharam Nandanwar

Bench: A Bhangale IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 467 /2009. Smt.Nanda w/o Dharam Nandanwar Bench: A Bhangale 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 467 /2009 Smt.Nanda w/o Dharam Nandanwar Aged about 42 years, occu: Business Represented through

More information

AT ARUSHA. Taxation Cause No.2 of 2012. (Originating from Appeal No. 1 of 2012) (Appellate Division) PLAXEDA RUGUMBA..

AT ARUSHA. Taxation Cause No.2 of 2012. (Originating from Appeal No. 1 of 2012) (Appellate Division) PLAXEDA RUGUMBA.. IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA Taxation Cause No.2 of 2012 (Originating from Appeal No. 1 of 2012) (Appellate Division) PLAXEDA RUGUMBA..APPLICANT VERSUS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE REPUBLIC

More information

No. 05-10-01016-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. FRED ANDERSON, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

No. 05-10-01016-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. FRED ANDERSON, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee No. 05-10-01016-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS FRED ANDERSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 5 of Dallas County,

More information

The Income Tax Ombudsman Guidelines 2010

The Income Tax Ombudsman Guidelines 2010 The Income Tax Ombudsman Guidelines 2010 The Guidelines are introduced with the objective of enabling the resolution of complaints relating to public grievances against the Income Tax Department and to

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/C/2015/000015

More information

N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act

N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act 1 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BARPETA. N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act Present : Md. Abdul Hakim, M.A.,LL.B., Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barpeta. Narayan Nath --- Complainant

More information

BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. AO/SM-LS/ERO/10/2016]

BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. AO/SM-LS/ERO/10/2016] BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. AO/SM-LS/ERO/10/2016] UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE

More information

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: 18 th September, 2015. Versus

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: 18 th September, 2015. Versus $~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.No.460/2002 Judgment delivered on: 18 th September, 2015 BELA SHARDA Represented by: Versus... Appellant Mr.Samar Banal and Mr. Vinayak Mehrotra,

More information

2 nd Appeal First Appeal No. 295 of 2013

2 nd Appeal First Appeal No. 295 of 2013 2 nd Additional Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No. 54 of 2013 Date of institution: 17.1.2013 Date of Decision: 20.1.2015 National

More information

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 170 OF 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 170 OF 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 170 OF 2009 Reserved on : 10-05-2010 Date of pronouncement: 04-06-2010 M/s Model Machinery Co. (P) Ltd. through Anr...Petitioner

More information

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA WTM/TCN/ERO/ 97/Jan/2009 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: Dr. T. C. NAIR, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER UNDER REGULATION 28 (2) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (INTERMEDIARIES) REGULATIONS,

More information

: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA

: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA : 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 7 TH DAY OF JUNE 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA BETWEEN: MFA.No.122 OF 2009 (MV) C/w MFA.No.120 OF 2009 (MV) New

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2005

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2005 1 ACTION NO: 219 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2005 (ELENA USHER ( BETWEEN( AND ( (OSBERT ORLANDO USHER PETITIONER RESPONDENT Coram: Hon. Justice Sir John Muria Ruling: 5 November 2007 Ms Lois Young

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4816-4817 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15531-15532 of 2007)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4816-4817 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15531-15532 of 2007) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4816-4817 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15531-15532 of 2007) S. Manickam... Appellant (s) Versus Metropolitan

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD... Appellant Through : Mr D.D. Singh with Mr

More information

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. DATED 22 nd AUGUST 2012. Petition No.488 (C) of 2012

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. DATED 22 nd AUGUST 2012. Petition No.488 (C) of 2012 TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI DATED 22 nd AUGUST 2012 Petition No.488 (C) of 2012 Conscious Citizen Forum Petitioner Vs. DEN Network Ltd. & Ors. Respondent BEFORE: HON BLE

More information

WP NOS.44490-93/2012 (EDN-REG-P)

WP NOS.44490-93/2012 (EDN-REG-P) - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 4 TH JANUARY 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH BETWEEN WP NOS.44490-93/2012 (EDN-REG-P) 1.CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF NURSING

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1489 OF 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1489 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1489 OF 2013 M/s R.W. Promotions P. Ltd., Mumbai Vs...Appellant 6.ITXA.1489.13.odt Assistant Commissioner

More information

Civil Revision No.38/2007

Civil Revision No.38/2007 Civil Revision No.38/2007 12.5.2015 Shri Navneet Dubey, counsel for the applicant. Heard on admission. Vide judgment and decree dated 31.8.2005, Second Civil Judge, Class-II, Panna in civil suit No.1-B/2005

More information

HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, GOLAGHAT. Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010.

HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, GOLAGHAT. Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010. Mrs. Manju Gohain.... Complainant. Vs. 1. The General Manager, Bajaj Allianz

More information

In the matter of an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

In the matter of an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. W.P (S ) No. 6786 of 2005 In the matter of an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Workmen of Nudkhurkee Colliery of Block II Areaof Bharat Coking Coal Limited through Sri NG. Arun,Organising

More information

CHAPTER 273 THE MONEYLENDERS ACT. Arrangement of Sections.

CHAPTER 273 THE MONEYLENDERS ACT. Arrangement of Sections. CHAPTER 273 THE MONEYLENDERS ACT. Arrangement of Sections. Section 1. Interpretation. 2. Licences to be taken out by moneylenders. 3. Certificate required for grant of moneylenders licence. 4. Suspension

More information

Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum & Ombudsman

Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum & Ombudsman Department of Industrial and Management Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Forum of Regulators 4 th Capacity Building Programme for Officers of Electricity Regulatory Commissions 18 23 July,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3269-3270 OF 2007 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3269-3270 OF 2007 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC... REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3269-3270 OF 2007 MONTFORD BROTHERS OF ST. GABRIEL & ANR.... APPELLANTS VS. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC....

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. Case No: 455/12 Reportable TRISTAR INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. Case No: 455/12 Reportable TRISTAR INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 455/12 Reportable In the matter between: TRISTAR INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD Appellant and THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES NATIONAL PROVIDENT FUND Respondent

More information

ACTS & RULES : Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department, Himachal Pradesh

ACTS & RULES : Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department, Himachal Pradesh Acts & Rules Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section(1) of section 30 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986(68 of 1986), Central Government hereby makes the following

More information

MONEYLENDERS ACT 1991

MONEYLENDERS ACT 1991 MONEYLENDERS ACT 1991 (Chapter 6) Arrangement of Sections PART I MONEYLENDERS 1. Registration of moneylenders. 2. Applications for registration. 3. Duration and renewal of registration. 4. Termination

More information

JAMAICA THE HON MR JUSTICE MORRISON JA THE HON MR JUSTICE BROOKS JA THE HON MS JUSTICE LAWRENCE-BESWICK JA (AG) BETWEEN GODFREY THOMPSON APPELLANT

JAMAICA THE HON MR JUSTICE MORRISON JA THE HON MR JUSTICE BROOKS JA THE HON MS JUSTICE LAWRENCE-BESWICK JA (AG) BETWEEN GODFREY THOMPSON APPELLANT [2014] JMCA Civ 37 JAMAICA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SUPREME COURT CIVIL APPEAL NO 41/2007 BEFORE: THE HON MR JUSTICE MORRISON JA THE HON MR JUSTICE BROOKS JA THE HON MS JUSTICE LAWRENCE-BESWICK JA (AG) BETWEEN

More information

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: CACHAR: SILCHAR: ASSAM

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: CACHAR: SILCHAR: ASSAM 1 BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: CACHAR: SILCHAR: ASSAM Present: Shri B. Debnath, B.Com, LLM, AJS. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Silchar. JUDGMENT IN MAC CASE NO 1471 of 2012

More information

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE. APPLICATION No. 70/2014(WZ)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE. APPLICATION No. 70/2014(WZ) BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE APPLICATION No. 70/2014(WZ) CORAM: Hon ble Mr. Justice V.R. Kingaonkar (Judicial Member) Hon ble Dr. Ajay A. Deshpande (Expert Member) B E

More information

Present: Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Advocate for the Informant.

Present: Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Advocate for the Informant. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA Case No. 46 of 2014 In Re: M/s Albion InfoTel Limited Informant And 1. M/s Google Inc. Opposite Party No. 1 2. M/s Google Ireland Limited Opposite Party No. 2 3. M/s Google

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM MIse CIVIL CAUSENO. 111 OF2005 JEETEN SINGH SEHMI. APPLICANT VERSUS JASKI LIMITED RESPONDENT RULING A.Shangwa,J. On 19/7/2005, Ms Hamida Sheikh filed a

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 754/2013. INDIAN AIRPORTS KAMGHAR UNION... Petitioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 754/2013. INDIAN AIRPORTS KAMGHAR UNION... Petitioner file:///c /Users/rakksingh/Desktop/754/W.P. (C)-754 OF 2013-08.02.2013.htm IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 754/2013 INDIAN AIRPORTS KAMGHAR UNION... Petitioner Through: Mr Colin Gonsalves,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRADE MARK MATTER. Judgment Pronounced on: 16.12.2011. CS(OS) 1104/2008 and IA No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRADE MARK MATTER. Judgment Pronounced on: 16.12.2011. CS(OS) 1104/2008 and IA No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRADE MARK MATTER Judgment Pronounced on: 16.12.2011 CS(OS) 1104/2008 and IA No. 13685/2008 TATA SONS LIMITED... Plaintiff Through Mr. Pravin Anand with

More information

This is an appeal filed by the appellant/complainant-avtar. Singh(hereinafter called the appellant ) against the order dated 2.4.

This is an appeal filed by the appellant/complainant-avtar. Singh(hereinafter called the appellant ) against the order dated 2.4. 2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No. 735 of 2008 Date of institution : 17.7.2008 Date of Decision : 31.1.2013 Avtar Singh

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.9030 OF 2013 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.9030 OF 2013 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.9030 OF 2013 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 18323 OF 2008) STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS APPELLANTS VERSUS NAVIR

More information

Chapter 14:14 MONEYLENDING AND RATES OF INTEREST ACT. Acts 9/1930, 25/1948,59/1961,6/1967, 7/1972, 5/1981, 30/1984, 22/2001; 16/2004. R.G.N. 554/1962.

Chapter 14:14 MONEYLENDING AND RATES OF INTEREST ACT. Acts 9/1930, 25/1948,59/1961,6/1967, 7/1972, 5/1981, 30/1984, 22/2001; 16/2004. R.G.N. 554/1962. Section Chapter 14:14 MONEYLENDING AND RATES OF INTEREST ACT Acts 9/1930, 25/1948,59/1961,6/1967, 7/1972, 5/1981, 30/1984, 22/2001; 16/2004. R.G.N. 554/1962. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Short title. 2.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1940 of 2007 ------- Smt. Kavilash Devi, wife of late Lajit Mahto, resident of village Pipradih, P.O and P.S. Barkagaon, District Hazaribagh.... Petitioner

More information

Surana & Surana National Corporate Law Moot Court Competition JSS Law College, Mysore 10-12 February 2012

Surana & Surana National Corporate Law Moot Court Competition JSS Law College, Mysore 10-12 February 2012 Surana & Surana National Corporate Law Moot Court Competition JSS Law College, Mysore 10-12 February 2012 Disclaimer: This problem is not an attempt to imitate or to preempt the outcome of any case lis

More information

COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KARMUP :: GUWAHATI. MAC Case Nos. 2446/09 & 2447/09. 1 Sri Arun Das 2 Sri Bipul Das (2447/09) Claimants - VS -

COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KARMUP :: GUWAHATI. MAC Case Nos. 2446/09 & 2447/09. 1 Sri Arun Das 2 Sri Bipul Das (2447/09) Claimants - VS - 1 COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KARMUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- Paran Kumar Phukan Member, MACT Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case Nos. 2446/09 & 2447/09 1 Smti Jamini Das 2 Sri Ambika Kurmi @ Das (2446/09)

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on October 19, 2015 Judgment delivered on November 17,2015 + W.P.(C) 6408/2014.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on October 19, 2015 Judgment delivered on November 17,2015 + W.P.(C) 6408/2014. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on October 19, 2015 Judgment delivered on November 17,2015 + W.P.(C) 6408/2014 ARUN OSWAL... Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Dias, Adv. versus

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 23rd February, 2015 MAC.APP. 56/2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 23rd February, 2015 MAC.APP. 56/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 23rd February, 2015 MAC.APP. 56/2015 NEETU THAKUR & ORS Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv.... Appellants versus

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 8th January, 2014 MAC.APP.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 8th January, 2014 MAC.APP. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 8th January, 2014 MAC.APP. 819/2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. Represented by: Mr. L.K. Tyagi,

More information

IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT

IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT PRESENT: Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam MAC CASE NO. 48/2010 (Under Section 166of the MV Act)

More information

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2012 with I.A. No. 210 of 2012

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2012 with I.A. No. 210 of 2012 COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2012 with I.A. No. 210 of 2012 [Under Section 53B of the Competition Act, 2002 against the order dated 29.3.2012 passed by the Competition Commission of

More information

2013 (4) ECS (228) (Tri Ahd) IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL WEST ZONAL BENCH AT AHMEDABAD COURT III

2013 (4) ECS (228) (Tri Ahd) IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL WEST ZONAL BENCH AT AHMEDABAD COURT III 2013 (4) ECS (228) (Tri Ahd) IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL WEST ZONAL BENCH AT AHMEDABAD COURT III M/s Surat Bottling Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE & ST, Vapi Application No.: ST/Stay/11475

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT, 1957 Date of decision: 10th October, 2014 LPA 683/2014.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT, 1957 Date of decision: 10th October, 2014 LPA 683/2014. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT, 1957 Date of decision: 10th October, 2014 LPA 683/2014 SURENDER SINGH KHRUB Through: Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv.... Appellant

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. MFA.No.3461/2011 A/W MFA.CROB.NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. MFA.No.3461/2011 A/W MFA.CROB.NO. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 23 RD DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR MFA.No.3461/2011 A/W MFA.CROB.NO.122/2011 (MV) MFA.NO.3461/2011 BETWEEN: LOURDU

More information

Small Claims: The Process in Detail

Small Claims: The Process in Detail What is a small claims division? Every justice court in Arizona has a small claims division to provide an inexpensive and speedy method for resolving most civil disputes that do not exceed $2,500. All

More information

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SLP 32420/2015 1 ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.32420/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE GAMBIA M. GENE FIELDER.PLAINTIFF. ANSUMANA MARENAH (Trading as Julakay Fast Food Restaurant)..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE GAMBIA M. GENE FIELDER.PLAINTIFF. ANSUMANA MARENAH (Trading as Julakay Fast Food Restaurant).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE GAMBIA CIVIL SUIT NO: HC/175/09/CO/058/D2 BETWEEN: M. GENE FIELDER.PLAINTIFF AND ANSUMANA MARENAH (Trading as Julakay Fast Food Restaurant)..DEFENDANT Wednesday 24 th November

More information

issue, of the respondents No.1 to 3 i.e. Union of India (UOI), the University

issue, of the respondents No.1 to 3 i.e. Union of India (UOI), the University * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 26 th September, 2014. + W.P.(C) 5937/2010 B. MAHESH SHARMA... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.J. Bhambhani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Zishan Sikandri, Adv.

More information

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Petition No. 669 of 2012. Loop Telecom Ltd. (Haryana) : Petitioner

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Petition No. 669 of 2012. Loop Telecom Ltd. (Haryana) : Petitioner TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Dated 19 th October, 2012 Petition No. 669 of 2012 Loop Telecom Ltd. (Haryana) : Petitioner Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited : Respondent BEFORE:

More information