IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 31st October, 2013 CM(M) 845/2013

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 31st October, 2013 CM(M) 845/2013"

Transcription

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 31st October, 2013 CM(M) 845/2013 ZAISHU XIE & ANR. Represented by: Mr.Arvind Chaudhary, Advocate.... Petitioners Versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS.... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pradeep Gaur and Mr.Amit Gaur, Advocates for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral) MAC.APP. 802/ The present petition is directed against the impugned order dated , whereby the learned Trial Court has dismissed the application filed by the petitioners for recording of their evidence either by way of Commission or through video conferencing as the petitioners are senior citizens and Chinese Nationals. 2. Facts of the case in brief are that on at about PM, deceased, namely, late Mr.Xie Xiaochao was travelling in Maruti Esteem Car bearing No.DL-1YB-0897 and was coming back to Delhi from Agra. A TATA Truck bearing No.MP-07HB-1587, which was coming on the other side of the road, hit the Maruti Esteem Car by jumping off the divider. The said Truck hit the Car on the right side, wherein the deceased was sitting on the rear seat behind the driver s seat. Consequently, an FIR was lodged at

2 Police Station Sadar, Palwal, Haryana on Due to the accident, the deceased named above died at the spot. 3. On , deceased had come to India from China to attend a Seminar organized by the Company alongwith Mr.Xiang Wang, Vice President of the Company and had checked in Hotel Sheraton. Hence, the deceased was residing in India at the time of his death. 4. Thereafter, the petitioners preferred a claim petition under Sections 166/140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which is pending adjudication before the Trial Court. Issues have already been framed by the Trial Court on and the case is pending for recording evidence of the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, an application was filed by the petitioners for summoning the witnesses alongwith list of witnesses way back in May, Thereafter, another application under Order XXVI Rules 1, 4 and 5 read with Section 151 CPC was filed by the petitioners for examining themselves by way of Commission. The learned Presiding Officer of the concerned Trial Court was of the view that the petitioners are old and nationals of China, therefore, directed the respondent No.1/Insurance Company to seek necessary instructions for conducting their examination by way of Commission. 6. Pursuant thereto, on , respondent No.1/Insurance Company informed the Trial Court that their Company did not have its office in China. Hence, vide order dated , the Trial Court directed the respondent No.1/Insurance Company to first explore the possibility of compromise and posted the matter for On said date, learned counsel for the respondent No.1/Insurance Company moved an application seeking permission to examine the petitioners by way of interrogatories to be sent through Indian High Commission in China. 7. Accordingly, in compliance of the order dated passed by the learned Trial Court, evidence by way of affidavit of the petitioner No.1 duly translated and attested from the Competent Authority in China was filed by the petitioners. Same is enclosed as Annexure P Thereafter, respondent No.1/Insurance Company was directed to file the interrogatories/questionnaire to the petitioners and if required, the

3 examination of the petitioners would be conducted through video conferencing. 9. However, due to the change of the Presiding Officer of the concerned Trial Court, the Trial Court insisted on the personal presence of the petitioners, despite the fact that orders have been passed by the Predecessor directing respondent No.1/Insurance Company to provide interrogatories which would be answered by the petitioners either on affidavit or by crossexamining them through video conferencing. 10. Being aggrieved, the petitioners had moved another application before the Trial Court seeking modification of the said order. 11. Thereafter, petitioners made their endeavours to prove the FIR by summoning the Investigating Officer of the present case, but he did not appear for the reasons best known to him. Having no option, vide order dated , the Trial Court issued the bailable warrants against the Investigating Officer and posted the matter on The petitioners, being aggrieved with the delay in conducting proceedings before the Trial Court, preferred a petition bearing CM(M) No.1278/2012 before this Court. While disposing of the same vide order dated , this Court directed the Trial Court to dispose of the application of the petitioners within a period of two months. 13. Accordingly, the Trial Court dismissed the said application vide impugned order dated and recorded as under:- In the overall facts and circumstances of this case having gone through the relevant provisions of CPC I do not at all feel it fit to appoint a Commission for examination of the petitioners in China in as much as it is very much desirable that the evidence of the petitioners should be recorded in the court itself with the help of a interpreter to be provided by Embassy of China in India. In view of these observations the pending application of the petitioner U/o26 r/w Sec.151 of CPC is hereby dismissed. 14. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, it is emerged that a similar situation came up before this Court in the case of Milano Impex P. Ltd. Vs. Egle Footwear P. Ltd. & Ors. 188 (2012) DLCT 202, whereby the video conferencing was allowed by this Court on certain conditions.

4 15. Keeping in view the dictum of this Court in the case of Milano Impex P. Ltd. (supra) and the fact that the petitioners are nationals of China and are senior citizen and in the interest of justice, I am of the considered opinion that this petition deserves to be allowed. 16. Accordingly, I set aside the impugned order dated passed by the Trial Court. 17. Consequently, Trial Court is directed to conduct the evidence of the petitioner through video conferencing in the following terms and conditions:- (i) Evidence of the petitioner No.1 shall be recorded through video conferencing between Delhi, India and Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China. (ii) In Delhi, the video conferencing shall be conducted in the facilities available in the Video Conferencing Room at Tis Hazari Courts. (iii) The Incharge of the Video Conferencing Facilities at Tis Hazari Courts should be appointed as the Coordinator with regard to the technical aspects of video conferencing in the Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China. (iv) The Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China shall nominate a senior officer of India to facilitate the video conferencing. The officer nominated by the Indian Consulate General shall coordinate the video conferencing arrangements at Guangzhou, China and shall remain present at the time of recording of evidence of the petitioner No.1. (v) The officer nominated by the Indian High Commissioner in terms of the direction at serial No. (iv) above shall ensure that apart from his own presence, only the Interpreter is present at the time of video conferencing unless required under serial No.(xix) below. (vi) The officer nominated by the Consulate General of India shall verify the identity of the petitioner No.1 before commencement of his examination. (vii) The Trial Court may appoint a Local Commissioner, if deems fit or record on his own, for the purposes of recording the evidence of petitioner No. 1. (viii) As soon as identification part is complete, oath will be administered by the Local Commissioner so appointed by the Trial Court or by the Court itself through the media as per Oaths Act, (ix) The petitioner No.1 shall be examined during working hours of Indian Courts. The plea of any inconvenience on account of time difference between India and China shall not be allowed. However, the convenience of

5 the Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China shall be taken into consideration in fixing the time and schedule. (x) The cross-examination, as far as practicable, be proceeded without any interruption and without granting unnecessary adjournments. However, discretion of the Local Commissioner shall be respected, if so appointed by the Trial Court. (xi) The Local Commissioner, if appointed, may record any material remarks regarding the demur of the petitioner No.1 while on the screen and shall note the objections raised during recording of evidence. (xii) The deposition of the petitioner No.1 shall be signed immediately in the presence of the nominated officer of the Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China. The said officer shall certify/attest the signatures of the witness/petitioner No.1. (xiii) The audio and visual shall be recorded at both the ends and copies thereof shall be provided to the parties at the expense of the petitioners. (xiv) The Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China shall provide an official translator to facilitate the translation of questions from English language to Chinese language and answers from Chinese language to English language for the recording of evidence of petitioner No. 1 in English language. (xv) The petitioners shall bear the cost/expenses of the video conference. The expenses for the video conferencing to be undertaking in Beijing shall be informed to the petitioners through counsel by the Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China. However, in case of any difficulty, the same may be communicated to the Incharge of the Video Conferencing facilities at Tis Hazari Courts by , who shall communicate the same to the petitioners lawyer in India. (xvi) The officer of the Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China to be nominated by the Consulate, shall be paid a lump sum amount of Rs.50,000/- as honorarium by the petitioners. (xvii) The petitioners counsel shall prepare certified copies of the entire court file of the Trial Court, which shall be forwarded to the office of the Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China with the assistance of the Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi. (xviii) This record shall be made available to the officer nominated by the Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China for the purpose of undertaking the video conferencing as it would be necessary for recording the statement and cross-examination of the petitioner No.1. (xix) In case, the respondents or their counsels are desirous of being physically present at Guangzhou, China, at the time of recording of the

6 evidence, it shall be open for them to make arrangements on their own cost for appearance and their representation. The respondents shall ensure that prior intimation in this regard is filed in the Registry of this Court giving full particulars and the names of the persons as well as enclosing documents of authority in respect of the persons, who shall be representing them in the proceedings. The intimation in this regard as well as documents shall also be furnished to the Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China. (xx) The evidence should be recorded expeditiously and the entire proceedings before the learned Trial Court shall be disposed of in a time bound manner. 18. I here make it clear that the aforesaid directions are passed in the open Court and counsel for the parties, on instructions, have agreed thereto. I further make it clear that the aforesaid directions are subject to feasibility and possibility of the facilities available at the Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China. 19. It is further clarified that if any difficulty arises at the Consulate General of India, Unit 1-4, 14th Floor Skyfame Tower, 8 Lin He Zhong Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, China, Telephone Nos to 05 and Fax Nos , , the petitioners are at liberty to approach this Court. 20. I expect from the Trial Court to make all endeavours to dispose of the claim petition expeditiously. 21. The Registry of this Court is directed to send copies of this order to the Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, the Consulate General of India at Guangzhou, China and the concerned Trial Court for compliance. 22. A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master. 23. TCR be returned to the concerned Trial Court. OCTOBER 31, 2013 Sd/- SURESH KAIT, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER. Decided on: 02nd March, 2015 MAC.APP. 38/2014 MAC.APP.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER. Decided on: 02nd March, 2015 MAC.APP. 38/2014 MAC.APP. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER Decided on: 02nd March, 2015 MAC.APP. 38/2014 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth Gaur, Advocate.. Appellant versus

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 23rd February, 2015 MAC.APP. 56/2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 23rd February, 2015 MAC.APP. 56/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Decided on: 23rd February, 2015 MAC.APP. 56/2015 NEETU THAKUR & ORS Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Adv.... Appellants versus

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 8th January, 2014 MAC.APP.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 8th January, 2014 MAC.APP. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 8th January, 2014 MAC.APP. 819/2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. Represented by: Mr. L.K. Tyagi,

More information

SOLATIUM SCHEME, 19891

SOLATIUM SCHEME, 19891 SOLATIUM SCHEME, 19891 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 163 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 1988), the Central Government hereby makes the following scheme for the

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD... Appellant Through : Mr D.D. Singh with Mr

More information

COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KAMRUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- Paran Kumar Phukan Member, MACT Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case No.

COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KAMRUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- Paran Kumar Phukan Member, MACT Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case No. COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KAMRUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- Paran Kumar Phukan Member, MACT Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case No. 161/2010 1 Mrs Dipa Bora 2 Sri Moleswar Bora 3 Mrs Sarumai Bora 4 Miss

More information

IN THE OFFICE OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, NO.2 KAMRUP, GUWAHATI

IN THE OFFICE OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, NO.2 KAMRUP, GUWAHATI 1 IN THE OFFICE OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, NO.2 KAMRUP, GUWAHATI Present Sri. H. C. Sarma, B. Sc., LLb. AJS MACT. Case No.490 of 2008 U/S 166 of the M.V. Act 1. Manabendra Malakar S/o Janardan

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923. FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923. FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008 DATE OF DECISION 19.03.2008 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.... Through: Appellant

More information

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BARPETA

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BARPETA BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BARPETA PRESENT Sri A.F.A. BORA, (A.J.S.) MEMBER, M.A.C.T, BARPETA. M.A.C. Case No. 239/2013 1. Anjuwara Khatun... Claimant No. 1 2. Md. Jabed Ali...

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DEFAMATION Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006 NEMICHAND JAIN ALIAS CHANDRA SWAMI... Petitioner Through Mr. K.K. Sud, Sr.

More information

MAC CASE NO.185/2013: U/S 166 OF THE M.V.ACT. Member, MACT, Golaghat

MAC CASE NO.185/2013: U/S 166 OF THE M.V.ACT. Member, MACT, Golaghat 1 P a g e IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT. MAC CASE NO.185/2013: U/S 166 OF THE M.V.ACT. Present: Md.A.U.Ahmed Member, MACT, Golaghat Sri Dilip Sarma Son of Sri Jogen

More information

258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Versus. Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakshi, Addl. AG, Haryana.

258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Versus. Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakshi, Addl. AG, Haryana. 258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-6003 of 2015 Date of decision:march 10, 2015 Swati and others State of Haryana Versus... Petitioners... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE

More information

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: CACHAR: SILCHAR: ASSAM

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: CACHAR: SILCHAR: ASSAM 1 BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: CACHAR: SILCHAR: ASSAM Present: Shri B. Debnath, B.Com, LLM, AJS. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Silchar. JUDGMENT IN MAC CASE NO 1471 of 2012

More information

LegalCrystal - Indian Law Search Engine - www.legalcrystal.com. Jayavanti Dawood Khalfe and Others Vs. Pushpa Ramdas and Others

LegalCrystal - Indian Law Search Engine - www.legalcrystal.com. Jayavanti Dawood Khalfe and Others Vs. Pushpa Ramdas and Others LegalCrystal - Indian Law Search Engine - www.legalcrystal.com Jayavanti Dawood Khalfe and Others Vs. Pushpa Ramdas and Others LegalCrystal Citation : legalcrystal.com/949531 Court : Mumbai Decided On

More information

(2) (a) Rules 1 to 31, rules 34 to 37 and rule 41 of these rules shall come into force on the 1 st day of April, 2009;

(2) (a) Rules 1 to 31, rules 34 to 37 and rule 41 of these rules shall come into force on the 1 st day of April, 2009; [Published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary Part II, section 3, sub-section (i)] Ministry of Corporate Affairs Notification New Delhi, 1 st April, 2009 G.S.R. 229 (E).- In exercise of the powers

More information

PROCEDURE FOR APPLYING ONLINE FOR INDIAN CITIZENSHIP

PROCEDURE FOR APPLYING ONLINE FOR INDIAN CITIZENSHIP PROCEDURE FOR APPLYING ONLINE FOR INDIAN CITIZENSHIP 1. Introduction to Indian Citizenship: The Constitution of India provides a single citizenship for the entire country. The Citizenship Act enacted by

More information

HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, GOLAGHAT. Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010.

HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, GOLAGHAT. Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010. Mrs. Manju Gohain.... Complainant. Vs. 1. The General Manager, Bajaj Allianz

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 1- CRM-M-6758-2015 (O&M) Date of decision: September 16, 2015. Central Bureau of Investigation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 1- CRM-M-6758-2015 (O&M) Date of decision: September 16, 2015. Central Bureau of Investigation CRM-M-6758 of 2015 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 1- CRM-M-6758-2015 (O&M) Date of decision: September 16, 2015. Central Bureau of Investigation...Petitioner Versus Harsimranjit

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT, 1956 Reserved on: 25th November, 2013 Date of Decision:21st January, 2014 CO. APPL. 1261/2007 IN CO. PET. 354/2001 REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT ; SERVICE MATTER. Judgment delivered on: 10.03.2014. W.P.(C) 2656/2013 and CM No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT ; SERVICE MATTER. Judgment delivered on: 10.03.2014. W.P.(C) 2656/2013 and CM No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT ; SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: 10.03.2014 W.P.(C) 2656/2013 and CM No.5029/2013 (stay) ABHISHEK YADAV... PETITIONER VERSUS ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Ref: MAC Case No.70 of 2011 Name of Parties: 1. Mustt. Manowara Begum--------------------------------------Claimant.

More information

THE WORKMEN S COMPENSATION RULES, 1924

THE WORKMEN S COMPENSATION RULES, 1924 INDEX THE WORKMEN S COMPENSATION RULES, 1924 Rules Particulars Page PRELIMINARY 1. Short title 1062 2. Definitions 1062 PART I: REVIEW OF HALF-MONTHLY PAYMENTS AND COMMUTATION THEREOF 3. When application

More information

THE PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE RULES, 1991

THE PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE RULES, 1991 THE PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE RULES, 1991 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS (Department of Environment, Forests and Wildlife) New Delhi, the 23rd January, 1991 Magha, 3, 1912 (Saka) NOTIFICATION 1 New

More information

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRUBUNAL:: DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRUBUNAL:: DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) 1 DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRUBUNAL:: DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Name of Parties: Ref: MAC Case No. 1 of 2009 1. Smti. Damayanti Nath-----------------------------------------Claimant

More information

PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTORY The parties to this agreement,, hereinafter referred to as the first party, and, hereinafter referred to as the second party, and both hereinafter referred to as the

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment reserved on: 28 th August, 2015 Judgment delivered on: 07 th January, 2016

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment reserved on: 28 th August, 2015 Judgment delivered on: 07 th January, 2016 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 28 th August, 2015 Judgment delivered on: 07 th January, 2016 + FAO(OS) 416/2015 & CM No.13475/2015 (stay) INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD

More information

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar.

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Page 1 HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Present :- Shri T.K.Bhattacharjee, A.J.S. Addl. District Judge, Cachar,Silchar.

More information

SPECIAL CONDITION OF CONTRACTS

SPECIAL CONDITION OF CONTRACTS SPECIAL CONDITION OF CONTRACTS i) The contractors should quote the rate in figures as well as in words, and amount tendered by them. The amount for each item should be worked out and the requisite totals

More information

IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR

IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR 1 MACT Case No.24/2012. IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR M.A.C.T CASE No.24/2012. P A R T I E S 1. Smti Rimpi Goswami. 2. Smti Rina Devi. 3. Miss Sanskriti

More information

To All Regional Director, All Registrar of Companies.

To All Regional Director, All Registrar of Companies. To All Regional Director, All Registrar of Companies. General Circular No. 36/2011 F. No. 2/3/2011-CL V Government of India Ministry of Corporate Affairs 5 th Floor, A Wing, Shastri Bhavan, Dr. R.P. Road,

More information

IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR, TEZPUR. MAC Case No. 93 of 2010

IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR, TEZPUR. MAC Case No. 93 of 2010 IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR, TEZPUR. MAC Case No. 93 of 2010 Sri Raja Paul S/o Sri Bimal Paul Lamabari, PO and PS Mazbhat, District: Udalguri Assam. Claimant (1) Mr Aju Cheje S/o Tadik

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4816-4817 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15531-15532 of 2007)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4816-4817 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15531-15532 of 2007) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4816-4817 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15531-15532 of 2007) S. Manickam... Appellant (s) Versus Metropolitan

More information

IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. M.A.C.T CASE No.28/2013. P A R T I E S. -Versus-

IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. M.A.C.T CASE No.28/2013. P A R T I E S. -Versus- 1 IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR M.A.C.T CASE No.28/2013. P A R T I E S Smti Amarawati Gogoi. Claimant. -Versus- 1. Hemanta Sonowal. ( Driver of vehicle

More information

DRAFT RULES UNDER CHAPTER XV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 COMPROMISES, ARRANGEMENTS AND AMALGAMATIONS. FORM No. 15.1. [See rule 15.

DRAFT RULES UNDER CHAPTER XV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 COMPROMISES, ARRANGEMENTS AND AMALGAMATIONS. FORM No. 15.1. [See rule 15. DRAFT RULES UNDER CHAPTER XV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 COMPROMISES, ARRANGEMENTS AND AMALGAMATIONS. FORM No. 15.1 [See rule 15.1(1)] [HEADING AS IN FORM NO. 4 of National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2013]

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3269-3270 OF 2007 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3269-3270 OF 2007 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC... REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3269-3270 OF 2007 MONTFORD BROTHERS OF ST. GABRIEL & ANR.... APPELLANTS VS. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC....

More information

JUDGMENT IN M.A.C. CASE NO. 374 OF 2009

JUDGMENT IN M.A.C. CASE NO. 374 OF 2009 IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR :: TEZPUR PRESENT : Sri A. Borthakur, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Sonitpur, Tezpur JUDGMENT IN M.A.C. CASE NO. 374 OF 2009

More information

IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR, TEZPUR. MAC Case No. 165 of 2013

IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR, TEZPUR. MAC Case No. 165 of 2013 IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR, TEZPUR. MAC Case No. 165 of 2013 1. Smti Sova Devi 2. Sri Rama Paswan Permanent resident of Vill & P.O- Hargobindpur P.S- Mahnar Dist- Baishali, Bihar Temporarily

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act. Date of Decision : December 03, 2008. WP(C) No.6406 of 2007.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act. Date of Decision : December 03, 2008. WP(C) No.6406 of 2007. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act Date of Decision : December 03, 2008 WP(C) No.6406 of 2007 Sh. Jawahar Singh. Petitioner Through : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Advocate

More information

Compulsory Arbitration

Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. (1) The following civil actions shall first be submitted to and heard by a Board of Arbitrators: (a) (b) (c) (d) Civil actions, proceedings

More information

FINAL JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER. This matter is before the Court on a Final Pretrial Conference pursuant to R. 4:25-1.

FINAL JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER. This matter is before the Court on a Final Pretrial Conference pursuant to R. 4:25-1. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MIDDLESEX COUNTY:LAW DIVISION Docket No. Plaintiff(s), v. Defendant(s). FINAL JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER This matter is before the Court on a Final Pretrial Conference pursuant to

More information

IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR :: TEZPUR

IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR :: TEZPUR IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR :: TEZPUR PRESENT : Sri B. Debnath Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Sonitpur JUDGMENT IN M.A.C. CASE NO. 258 OF 2009 1. Smt. Anjali

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1940 of 2007 ------- Smt. Kavilash Devi, wife of late Lajit Mahto, resident of village Pipradih, P.O and P.S. Barkagaon, District Hazaribagh.... Petitioner

More information

involved in an accident, or his next of kin, or the legal representative of the deceased, or the insurance company, as the case may be.

involved in an accident, or his next of kin, or the legal representative of the deceased, or the insurance company, as the case may be. (PUBLISHED IN PART-IV OF THE DELHI GAZETTE-EXTRAORDINARY) GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT 5/9 UNDER HILL ROAD, DELHI-110054 No. F.19(125)/Tpt./Sectt./2007/375 Dated

More information

www.nagpuruniversity.org The candidates fulfilling one of the following conditions shall be

www.nagpuruniversity.org The candidates fulfilling one of the following conditions shall be M.Phil./Ph.D. Degree Regulation-2009) (UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of dated 1 st June, 2009 Ph.D. Entrance Test (PET F.1-1/2002/(PS)/Exemp., www.nagpuruniversity.org The candidates fulfilling

More information

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BARPETA

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BARPETA BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BARPETA PRESENT Sri A.F.A. BORA, (A.J.S.) MEMBER, M.A.C.T, BARPETA. M.A.C. Case No. 518/2009 Usha Rani Das... Claimant Versus Shamal Das... O.P. No.

More information

COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KARMUP :: GUWAHATI. MAC Case Nos. 2446/09 & 2447/09. 1 Sri Arun Das 2 Sri Bipul Das (2447/09) Claimants - VS -

COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KARMUP :: GUWAHATI. MAC Case Nos. 2446/09 & 2447/09. 1 Sri Arun Das 2 Sri Bipul Das (2447/09) Claimants - VS - 1 COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KARMUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- Paran Kumar Phukan Member, MACT Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case Nos. 2446/09 & 2447/09 1 Smti Jamini Das 2 Sri Ambika Kurmi @ Das (2446/09)

More information

DEVELOPMENT OF LAW RELATING TO MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS AND IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS/ORDERS PASSED BY DELHI HIGH COURT

DEVELOPMENT OF LAW RELATING TO MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS AND IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS/ORDERS PASSED BY DELHI HIGH COURT DEVELOPMENT OF LAW RELATING TO MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS AND IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS/ORDERS PASSED BY DELHI HIGH COURT India has largest number of road accidents in the world. More than one lakh people die in

More information

2 nd Appeal First Appeal No. 295 of 2013

2 nd Appeal First Appeal No. 295 of 2013 2 nd Additional Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No. 54 of 2013 Date of institution: 17.1.2013 Date of Decision: 20.1.2015 National

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Versus HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Versus HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA CRM-M-24864-2015 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-24864-2015 Date of decision: December 02, 2015 Satnam Dilbagh Singh...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others...respondents

More information

#uvrewe (wart of Wtntuckg

#uvrewe (wart of Wtntuckg #uvrewe (wart of Wtntuckg IN RE : ORDER APPROVING AMENDED LOCAL RULES, 32ND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, BOYD COUNTY The Amended Local Rules of the 32nd Judicial Circuit, Boyd County, is hereby approved by the undersigned.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 313 of 2007 --------

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 313 of 2007 -------- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 313 of 2007 1. Dr. Mahendra Prasad Jha, 2. Dr. Khurshid Ahmed, 3. Dr. Animesh Priya, 4. Inder Narayan Mahto, 5. Pawan Kumar Mondal Petitioners Versus

More information

PLANT VARIETIES PROTECTION ACT (CHAPTER 232A, SECTION 54) PLANT VARIETIES PROTECTION RULES

PLANT VARIETIES PROTECTION ACT (CHAPTER 232A, SECTION 54) PLANT VARIETIES PROTECTION RULES CAP. 232A, R 1] Plant Varieties Protection Rules [2006 Ed. p. 1 PLANT VARIETIES PROTECTION ACT (CHAPTER 232A, SECTION 54) PLANT VARIETIES PROTECTION RULES Rule 1. Citation 2. Definitions 3. Fees 4. Forms

More information

Guidelines for Employees, Employers and Practitioners appearing before the Employment Appeals Tribunal

Guidelines for Employees, Employers and Practitioners appearing before the Employment Appeals Tribunal Guidelines for Employees, Employers and Practitioners appearing before the Employment Appeals Tribunal This is a guideline only and, as such, does not purport to give a full and comprehensive description

More information

STEPS FOR COMPANY FORMATION

STEPS FOR COMPANY FORMATION STEPS FOR COMPANY FORMATION START SELECTION OF THE TYPE OF THE COMPANY APPLY FOR DIRECTORS IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AND DIGITAL SIGNATURES SELECTION OF NAME FOR THE PROPOSED COMPANY AND E-FILING OF FORM 1A.

More information

Statement after the Act on Marriage Formation and Dissolution 11b concerning knowledge of Aliens Act rules on family reunification

Statement after the Act on Marriage Formation and Dissolution 11b concerning knowledge of Aliens Act rules on family reunification Statement after the Act on Marriage Formation and Dissolution 11b concerning knowledge of Aliens Act rules on family reunification Pursuant to section 9 (1) (a - d) a residence permit can be issued upon

More information

RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL

RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL Application (1) This rule does not apply to summary trials under Rule 19, except as provided in that rule. Witness to testify orally (2) Subject to any Act, statute

More information

BAIL AND REMAND. Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article

BAIL AND REMAND. Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article 1 BAIL AND REMAND Every citizen of India has a fundamental right of freedom under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Since we are governed by the rule of law, freedom of every individual within the

More information

IN THE COURT OF MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR.

IN THE COURT OF MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. IN THE COURT OF MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. 1 M.A.C.T. Case No.71/2009. P A R T I E S Smti Momi Baruah.... Claimant. -versus- 1. Branch Manager/ Divisional

More information

IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT. Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam

IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT. Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam Page 1 IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT PRESENT: Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam MAC CASE NO. 53/2011 (Under Section 163-A of

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY MFA NO. 2293/2010 (MV)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY MFA NO. 2293/2010 (MV) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF JUNE 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY BETWEEN MFA NO. 2293/2010 (MV) NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED DO-3,

More information

2572-022cv UHL30.1 02.336176.1

2572-022cv UHL30.1 02.336176.1 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE CONVENTION CENTER PHASE III EXPANSION AND EXPANSION HOTEL PROJECT BY AND BETWEEN: CITY OF SAN DIEGO BRIGETTE BROWNING SERGIO GONZALES UNITE HERE LOCAL 30 2572-022cv UHL30.1

More information

AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS PALM BEACH ESTATE PLANNING COUNCIL, INC. (A Corporation Not For Profit) ADOPTED :, 2012.

AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS PALM BEACH ESTATE PLANNING COUNCIL, INC. (A Corporation Not For Profit) ADOPTED :, 2012. AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS OF PALM BEACH ESTATE PLANNING COUNCIL, INC. (A Corporation Not For Profit) ADOPTED :, 2012 Article I NAME The name of this not for profit Corporation, as stated in its Articles

More information

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, NAGAON.

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, NAGAON. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, NAGAON. PRESENT : Smti. H. D. Bhuyan, District Judge, Nagaon. MONEY APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2011 This Money Appeal is directed against the Order & Judgment and decree dated 16-12-2010

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014 Dhropadabai and Others Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Technocraft Toolings Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Dipak

More information

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SMT. SAROJ AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 3483 of 2009) MAY 12, 2009 [S.B. SINHA AND DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, JJ.

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SMT. SAROJ AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 3483 of 2009) MAY 12, 2009 [S.B. SINHA AND DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, JJ. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SMT. SAROJ AND ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 3483 of 2009) MAY 12, 2009 [S.B. SINHA AND DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, JJ.] Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ss.166 and 168 Second Schedule Vehicular

More information

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT No. R.. Date ROAD ACCIDENT FUND ACT, 1996 ROAD ACCIDENT FUND REGULATIONS, 2008 The Minister of Transport has, under section 26 of the Road Accident Fund Act, 1996 (Act No. 56 of

More information

STATUTE OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL

STATUTE OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL STATUTE OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL Adopted by Commonwealth Governments on 1 July 1995 and amended by them on 24 June 1999, 18 February 2004, 14 May 2005, 16 May 2007 and 28 May 2015.

More information

Companies (Court) Rules, 1959

Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 643 of the Companies Act, 1956, and of all other powers enabling, the Supreme Court of India, after

More information

Swedbank P&C Insurance AS general terms and conditions of insurance contracts 3

Swedbank P&C Insurance AS general terms and conditions of insurance contracts 3 Swedbank P&C Insurance AS general terms and conditions of insurance contracts 3 This is a translation. In case of dispute the Estonian terms and conditions are valid. Swedbank P&C Insurance AS 01 March

More information

FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 / 2009. 1. Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Mall Road, Kanpur

FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 / 2009. 1. Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Mall Road, Kanpur STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UTTARAKHAND DEHRADUN FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 / 2009 1. Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Mall Road, Kanpur 2. Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. MFA.No.3461/2011 A/W MFA.CROB.NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. MFA.No.3461/2011 A/W MFA.CROB.NO. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 23 RD DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR MFA.No.3461/2011 A/W MFA.CROB.NO.122/2011 (MV) MFA.NO.3461/2011 BETWEEN: LOURDU

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS THE TRIAL COURT STANDING ORDER NO. 2-86 (AMENDED)

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS THE TRIAL COURT STANDING ORDER NO. 2-86 (AMENDED) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS THE TRIAL COURT SUFFOLK, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT STANDING ORDER NO. 2-86 (AMENDED) Applicable to All Counties to cases initiated by indictment on or after September

More information

Subordinate Services Attached to Civil Courts. (other than High Court)

Subordinate Services Attached to Civil Courts. (other than High Court) Ch. 18 Part A] CHAPTER 18 Subordinate Services Attached to Civil Courts (other than High Court) Part A CONTROL Rules framed by the High Court under Section 35(3) of the Punjab Courts Act for subordinate

More information

IN THE OFFICE OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, NO.2 KAMRUP, GUWAHATI

IN THE OFFICE OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, NO.2 KAMRUP, GUWAHATI 1 IN THE OFFICE OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, NO.2 KAMRUP, GUWAHATI Present Sri. H. C. Sarma, B. Sc., LLb. AJS MACT. Case No.208/09 U/S 166 & 140 of Motor Vehicle Act 1. Smti. Kritanjali Dutta W/o

More information

OPERATING AGREEMENT W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the parties have created a Limited Liability Company under the laws of the State of New Jersey; and

OPERATING AGREEMENT W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the parties have created a Limited Liability Company under the laws of the State of New Jersey; and OPERATING AGREEMENT OPERATING AGREEMENT made effective this day of, 2012, by and between and, residing at, such individuals hereinafter being collectively referred to as Members and each individually as

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2013 Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2013 Central Bank of India and others...petitioners

More information

IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT. Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam

IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT. Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam Page 1 IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT PRESENT: Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam MAC CASE NO.16/2010 (Under Section 166 of the

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014 GURCHARAN SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. N.K. Gupta, Advocate versus

More information

REVISED SCHEME FOR RELIEF AND REHABILITATION OF VICTIMS OF RAPE (As revised on 15 th April 2010)

REVISED SCHEME FOR RELIEF AND REHABILITATION OF VICTIMS OF RAPE (As revised on 15 th April 2010) REVISED SCHEME FOR RELIEF AND REHABILITATION OF VICTIMS OF RAPE (As revised on 15 th April 2010) STATEMENT OF OBJECT AND REASONS The Hon ble Supreme Court in Delhi Domestic Working Women s Forum Vs. Union

More information

THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE & NOT HAVING SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES OF. ASSOCIATION OF THE lit BOMBAY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION

THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE & NOT HAVING SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES OF. ASSOCIATION OF THE lit BOMBAY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE & NOT HAVING SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE lit BOMBAY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE & NOT HAVING SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES

More information

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. Private Limited Company and Unlisted Public Limited Company (Buy-Back of Securities) Rules, 1999 Notification G.S.R. 502(e) dated 6-07-1999 - In exercise of the powers conferred by section 77A of Companies

More information

District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR.

District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. 1 High Court Form No.(J)3. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN THE APPEAL. District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. PRESENT : Sri A.K.Das, District Judge, Lakhimpur, North

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 3rd December, 2013 MAC.A. No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 3rd December, 2013 MAC.A. No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Judgment delivered on: 3rd December, 2013 MAC.A. No.693/2006 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Represented by: Mr. Pradeep Gaur,

More information

: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA

: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA : 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 7 TH DAY OF JUNE 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA BETWEEN: MFA.No.122 OF 2009 (MV) C/w MFA.No.120 OF 2009 (MV) New

More information

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Ref: MAC Case No.119 of 2011 Name of Parties: 1. Md. Abdul Rafique-----------------------------------------------Claimant

More information

-Vs- 1. Md. Farman Ali S/o Md. Bujir Ali P/o Monowa P.S.-Mukaluwa Dist.-Nalbari, Assam

-Vs- 1. Md. Farman Ali S/o Md. Bujir Ali P/o Monowa P.S.-Mukaluwa Dist.-Nalbari, Assam 1 IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, NO.2 KAMRUP, GUWAHATI Present Sri. H. C. Sarma, B. Sc., LLb. AJS MACT. Case No.1833/2011 U/S 166 of Motor Vehicle Act 1. Mrs Saleha Begum W/o Lt. Safedar

More information

Deal or Appeal. Thursday, November 16, 2006 4:30 PM to 5:45 PM Room # B405

Deal or Appeal. Thursday, November 16, 2006 4:30 PM to 5:45 PM Room # B405 Deal or Appeal Thursday, November 16, 2006 4:30 PM to 5:45 PM Room # B405 TM adventurelaw APPEAL OR DEAL: DEFENDING AN ACCIDENT AT YOUR FACILITY Prepared By R. Wayne Pierce, Esquire The Pierce Law Firm,

More information

Dr. Ambedkar Medical Aid Scheme (Revised 2013)

Dr. Ambedkar Medical Aid Scheme (Revised 2013) Dr. Ambedkar Medical Aid Scheme (Revised 2013) The scheme is meant to provide medical treatment facility to the patients suffering from serious ailments requiring surgery of Kidney, Heart, Liver, Cancer

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Acknowledgements... Table of Cases...

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Acknowledgements... Table of Cases... Preface... Acknowledgements... History... Table of Cases... xiii xv xvii xix PART I COURT STRUCTURE AND PROCEDURAL CHARTS... 3 Court Structure Launching and Prosecuting an Appeal Checklist for Parole Ineligibility

More information

Settlement of Tax Cases. CA Final Paper 7 Direct Tax Laws, Chapter 22 CA. Shekhar Sane

Settlement of Tax Cases. CA Final Paper 7 Direct Tax Laws, Chapter 22 CA. Shekhar Sane Settlement of Tax Cases CA Final Paper 7 Direct Tax Laws, Chapter 22 CA. Shekhar Sane Learning Objectives To learn methodologies to compromise or settle income tax matters by correctly representing a case

More information

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Codification District of Columbia Official Code IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 2001 Edition 2004 Fall Supp. West Group Publisher To provide greater access and participation in public services,

More information

RENT A MOTOR CYCLE SCHEME, 1997 1

RENT A MOTOR CYCLE SCHEME, 1997 1 RENT A MOTOR CYCLE SCHEME, 1997 1 In exercise of powers conferred by section 75 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 1988), Central Government hereby makes the following scheme for regulating the business

More information

No. 30 February 16, 2016. The President

No. 30 February 16, 2016. The President Vol. 81 Tuesday, No. 30 February 16, 2016 Part IV The President Executive Order 13719 Establishment of the Federal Privacy Council: Republication VerDate Sep2014 16:34 Feb 12, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000

More information

In the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kokrajhar. Present M. A. Choudhury. Member, MACT, Kokrajhar. MAC CASE NO 100 of 2011.

In the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kokrajhar. Present M. A. Choudhury. Member, MACT, Kokrajhar. MAC CASE NO 100 of 2011. 1 In the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kokrajhar. Present M. A. Choudhury. Member, MACT, Kokrajhar. MAC CASE NO 100 of 2011. 1. Smti Anita Brahma. Vs. 1. Sri Raja Basumatary. 2. Sri Amar Brahma. ----------------

More information

PRO - ACTIVE DISCLOSURES OF UNDER SEC 4 (1) OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CHENNAI-4.

PRO - ACTIVE DISCLOSURES OF UNDER SEC 4 (1) OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CHENNAI-4. PRO - ACTIVE DISCLOSURES OF UNDER SEC 4 (1) OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CHENNAI-4. (Extract of Rule 4(1) (b) of the Right to Information Act 2005.) (i)

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. Civil Appeal No. 6476 of 1998. Decided On: 18.04.2005

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. Civil Appeal No. 6476 of 1998. Decided On: 18.04.2005 Equivalent Citation: II(2005)ACC361, 2005ACJ1323, AIR2005SC2337, 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)563, 2005(4)ALT44(SC), 2005(3)AWC2126(SC), 2005(2)BLJR1107, (2006)1CALLT31(SC), [2005]125CompCas86(SC), 2005(3)CTC569, JT2005(4)SC399,

More information

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY, INC. CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY, INC. PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XI OF THE PRIVATE HOUSING FINANCE LAW AND SECTION 402 OF THE NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION LAW We, the undersigned,

More information

BY-LAWS OF MISSOURI ONE CALL SYSTEM, INC.

BY-LAWS OF MISSOURI ONE CALL SYSTEM, INC. BY-LAWS OF MISSOURI ONE CALL SYSTEM, INC. Inc." Section 1. ARTICLE I Name and Purposes of the Business Name. The name of this Corporation shall be "Missouri One Call System, Section 2. Purpose. The purpose

More information

CHITTAGONG STOCK EXCHANGE (INTERNET BASED TRADING SERVICES) REGULATIONS, 2002

CHITTAGONG STOCK EXCHANGE (INTERNET BASED TRADING SERVICES) REGULATIONS, 2002 CHITTAGONG STOCK EXCHANGE (INTERNET BASED TRADING SERVICES) REGULATIONS, 2002 In exercise of the power conferred by section 34 (1) of the Securities and Exchange Ordinance, 1969 (XVII of 1969), the Chittagong

More information

MODEL AGREEMENT FOR STORAGE/HANDLING OF STOCKS AT RWC...OF THE DEPOSITORS ON GENERAL BASIS.

MODEL AGREEMENT FOR STORAGE/HANDLING OF STOCKS AT RWC...OF THE DEPOSITORS ON GENERAL BASIS. MODEL AGREEMENT FOR STORAGE/HANDLING OF STOCKS AT RWC...OF THE DEPOSITORS ON GENERAL BASIS. This agreement entered into this day of...at (place) between Central Railside Warehouse Company Limited, Railside

More information