Patna High Court. Shridhar Singh vs Manu Singh on 5 September, Author: S Hussain Bench: S Hussain JUDGMENT S.N. Hussain, J.

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Patna High Court. Shridhar Singh vs Manu Singh on 5 September, 2007. Author: S Hussain Bench: S Hussain JUDGMENT S.N. Hussain, J."

Transcription

1 Patna High Court Shridhar Singh vs Manu Singh on 5 September, 2007 Author: S Hussain Bench: S Hussain JUDGMENT S.N. Hussain, J. 1. This Second Appeal has been filed by the plaintiff against the Judgment and decree of the learned court of appeal below allowing the money appeal and reversing the judgment and decree of the learned trial court by which the suit of the plaintiff-appellant was decreed. 2. Money Suit No. 24 of 1982 was filed by the sole plaintiff-appellant for realisation of Rs. 4, with interest (both pendentelite and future) and cost from defendant No. 1 (original respondent No. 1) claiming that at the instance of defendant No. l, the plaintiff gave him a loan of Rs. 3, for purchase of bullocks and for repair of his house and in token thereof defendant No. 1 executed a hand note on in favour of the plaintiff. He further claimed that the said loan was only an accommodation loan and he was not in money lending business. It was also asserted that defendant No. 2 undertook to repay the said amount with interest but inspite of plaintiff's demand and lapse of a long time the loan remained unpaid, hence the plaintiff had to file the said suit for recovery of the above mentioned principal amount of loan with interest totally amounting to Rs. 4, Defendant-respondent No. 2, who was the nephew of defendant-respondent No. 1, was subsequently added as defendant No. 2 in the suit after defendant-respondent No. 1 gifted his property to him. 3. Defendant No. 1 contested the claim of the plaintiff and asserted that mandatory provisions of the Bihar Money Lenders Act 1974 (Bihar Act XXII of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as 'the new Act' for the sake of brevity) were not complied by the plaintiff, although he and his father were professional money lenders, who cannot advance any accommodation loan and that his claim was also not maintainable under the provisions of the Debt Relief Act, because defendant No. 1 was not a scheduled debtor as he had no land of his own. He completely denied that he ever took any money as loan from the plaintiff or his father, or that he ever executed any hand note in plaintiff's favour and claimed that the entire allegation is false and concocted. He further claimed that the hand note is a fabricated document and the plaintiff might have obtained his signature in his intoxicated condition on blank paper for creating such a document collusively and fraudulently. Defendant No. 2 also filed his written statement contesting the plaintiff's claim on the same grounds and further asserting that he had no concern with any such loan or payment as he was not a party to the alleged loan or hand note. 4. Learned Munsif 3rd Court, Arrah decreed the money suit and the claim of plaintiff by his judgment and decree dated finding that the evidence proved that defendant No. 1 had taken loan from the plaintiff and even the witnesses of the defendant did not deny this fact and that the khatians of revisional survey (Ext.3 and 3/A) proved that plaintiff and his father had separate lands and the plaintiff had given accommodation loan to defendant No. 1. Accordingly the learned trial court held that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the amount mentioned in the hand note i.e. Rs. 3, from defendant No. 1. Indian Kanoon - 1

2 5. Against the said judgment and decree of the learned trial court the defendants filed Money Appeal No. 10 of 1987 which was contested by the plaintiff who also filed a cross- objection. The said appeal was finally allowed by the learned Additional District Judge 8th Court, Arrah (Bhojpur) by his judgment and decree dated after arriving at the following findings: (a) The statement of father of plaintiff, namely P. W. 1, that he was present at the time of execution of the hand note was not acceptable as the said statement was not proved either by any material or by the plaintiff or the scribe and hence P.W.1 was not a competent witness. (b) The evidence adduced on behalf of the defendant fully proved that the plaintiff and his father were doing joint money lending business which fact is corroborated from the deposition of P.W.I himself as well as from the defendants witnesses. (c) The plaintiff failed to prove that defendant No. 1 had executed the alleged hand note by putting his left thumb impression on in token of loan of Rs. 3, (d) The plaintiff had failed to prove by any material whatsoever that defendant No. 2 was in any way benefited by the aforesaid loan or had any concern with the same. (e) Admittedly there is no license produced or proved in this case as required by the Act and hence the claim in the suit is not maintainable. 6. Against the aforesaid judgment and decree of the lower appellate court the plaintiff filed the instant Second Appeal which was admitted on and this Court referred the matter to a Division Bench for final hearing after framing the following substantial question of law: Whether casual money lending is saved from the restriction imposed by Section 8 of the Money Lenders Act This question was in respectful disagreement with the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in case of Baijnath Prasad and Anr. v. Harnandan Mahto and Anr. by which the Division Bench relying upon the law, as it stood prior to the amendment, had extended the definition of the word 'Money Lender' read with Section 8 of the New Money Lenders' Act, However, when this second appeal came up before an Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court on , their Lordships directed this case to be listed before a Bench of a Single Judge after obtaining the permission from Hon'ble the Chief Justice on the basis of the following observations: This matter has come up before this Court on reference made by Single Judge of this Court dated It appears that learned Single Judge of this Court showing disagreement with the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Baijnath Prasad and Anr. v. Harnandan Mahto and Anr., referred this case for adjudication before a Division Bench itself. The ratio laid down by this Court in the case of Baijnath Prasad and Anr. (supra) since was passed by a Bench of this Court was binding upon the learned Single Judge and in our considered view, there would have been no occasion to disagree with the same. This is the requirement of judicial Indian Kanoon - 2

3 propriety and precedent of this Court. Shridhar Singh vs Manu Singh on 5 September, After the aforesaid order of the Hon'ble Division Bench, the matter has been placed before this Court for final hearing of the instant Second Appeal. In the instant second appeal, the only question which has been formulated by this Court at the time of admission of the instant Second Appeal under Order XLI Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that whether casual money lending is saved from the restriction imposed by Section 8 of the new Act. The said question was framed in disagreement with the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in case of Baijnath Prasad and Anr. v. Harnandan Mahto and Anr., as the learned Single Judge had observed that the said Division Bench relying upon the law, as it stood prior to the amendment, had extended the definition of the word 'money lender' beyond the definition in the present Act, whereas the instant matter arises out of the new definition of 'money lender' read with Section 8 of the new Act. 9. In the instant second appeal the order of the Division Bench dated has specifically held that the ratio laid down by the earlier Division Bench of this Court in case of Baijnath Prasad and Anr (supra) was binding upon the learned Single Judge and there was no occasion to disagree with the same as per the requirement of judicial propriety and precedence of this Court. In the said circumstances, it has to be considered at this stage as to whether the question of law formulated in the instant Second Appeal vide order dated can be entertained in view of the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Baijnath Prasad and Anr (supra). 10. In essence now this Court has to decide as to whether the learned court below has correctly decided the matter under the new Act. It is not in dispute that the alleged loan was taken and the alleged hand note was executed in the year 1979 after coming into force of the aforesaid Act in the year 1975 and the suit, out of which this appeal has arisen, was also filed much thereafter in the year Hence the instant case is clearly governed by the said Act. 11. The main dispute is with respect to the term 'money lender' which is defined under Section 2(k) of the Act as follows: 2(k) Money Lender means a person advancing loan and shall include a Hindu undivided family and the legal representatives and successors in interest, whether by inheritance, assignment or otherwise of a person who advances a loan; The next provision connected with the aforementioned question of law is Section 8 of the Act which reads as follows: 8. Suit for recovery of loan maintainable only by registered money lenders.- No court shall entertain a suit filed by a money lender for recovery of loan advanced by him after the commencement of this Act, unless such money lender was registered as such under this Act or the Bihar Money-Lenders Act, 1938 (Bihar Act III of 1938) at the time when the loan was advanced. 12. The learned court of appeal below after considering the pleadings of the parties and the points raised by them came to several findings of facts and the learned lower appellate court being final Indian Kanoon - 3

4 courts of facts, the said findings cannot be legally challenged in the instant second appeal. In the said circumstances, the only question framed in the instant second appeal for being considered at the time of final hearing is the maintainability of the plaintiff's claim in view of the specific provision of the Act. No other point has been raised on behalf of the appellant. 13. While considering the aforesaid point the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in case of Baijnath Prasad and Anr. (supra) had specifically found that the provision of Section 2(k) of the new Act corresponds with Section 2(g) of the old Bihar Money Lenders Act of 1938 (Bihar Act III of 1938) as modified by the Act of 1939 and the difference in the language of the two statutory provisions is only this that in Section 2(g) of the Old Act, "Money Lender" has been defined as meaning "a person which advances a loan", whereas in the New Act it has been defined as meaning "a person advancing a loan", hence the said Division Bench in its considered view found that there is no difference in the spirit and the substance of the two definitions irrespective of slight grammatical variation in the participles used. 14. The provision of Sections 4 and 5 of the new Act are mutatis mutandis same as in the old Act as there is absolutely no difference in the language used in the two corresponding provisions. Hence, the said Division Bench held that there is no distinction between a series of decisions of this Court having a bearing on the question at hand, nor there is any change much less any substantial change in the language of the relevant provisions except that Section 8 has been substituted in the new Act. 15. It may be noted that Section 2(k) of the new Act read with Section 8 of the new Act have to be considered in the light of the language of Sections 4 and 5 of the new Act with respect to the term " Money Lender". In that regard, reference may be made to a decision of this Court in case of Bijaylal Agarwalla v. Prematha Nath Dutta reported in 1967 Patna LR 259, in which it had been held that for the purposes of registration under Section 4 of the old Act the word 'Money Lender" has to be used not in terms of the definition as provided under Section 2(g) of that Act, but in the sense it appears to have been used in the context of Section 5 of that Act and in that case, the term "Money Lender" used in Section 4 of the old Act, which is the same as Section 4 of the new Act, means only those money lenders who are professionals or carrying on money lending as business. 16. Another plea has been taken that even if the loan was casual and accommodatory, it had been advanced on interest and hence it would come under the purview of the new Act. But this plea also cannot be entertained as a man does not become a money lender by reason of occasional loan to relations, friends or acquaintances, whether interest be charged or not, as charity and kindliness are not the bases of usury for becoming a money lender. There must be more than occasional and disconnected loans in business of money lending which imports the notion of system, repetition and continuity. In this regard, reference may be made to a decision of this Court in case of Sano Kasinath Chaudhuri v. Pattito Sabuto reported in AIR 1942 Patna Considering the entire matter as aforesaid, the learned Division Bench of this Court in case of Baijnath Prasad and Anr. (supra) decided the issue and held that the decision of the learned Single Judge in the case of Newa Lal Rai v. Mahendra Rai reported in 1979 BBCJ 764 does not lay down a correct proposition of law and has to be overruled, only more so since the bar of non-maintainability Indian Kanoon - 4

5 of the suit on the ground of the plaintiff being not a registered money lender had never been canvassed in the two courts of facts below nor had it been pleaded. 18. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the settled principles of law this case is squarely covered by the aforesaid decisions and hence I do not find any merit in the instant second appeal, nor do I find that the substantial question of law framed in this appeal earlier is really a substantial question of law which can be entertained. Furthermore the judicial propriety and the precedence also requires that the matter already decided by an earlier Division Bench of this Court has to be followed by learned Single Judge covering the same point. In the said circumstances, this second appeal is devoid of any merit and is accordingly dismissed but without cost. Indian Kanoon - 5

District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR.

District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. 1 High Court Form No.(J)3. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN THE APPEAL. District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. PRESENT : Sri A.K.Das, District Judge, Lakhimpur, North

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) RSA No.146 of 2016 Sri Samir Kumar Chandra Appellant

More information

Money Suit No. 43 / 2007

Money Suit No. 43 / 2007 Assam Schedule VII Form No. 132 HIGH COURT FORM NO. (J) 2 HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT/CASE District: Sonitpur In The Court of the Munsiff No. 1, Tezpur, Sonitpur Present : Mrs.Chitra Rani Saikia,

More information

MONEY SUIT NO. 249/2000

MONEY SUIT NO. 249/2000 HIGH COURT FORM NO. (J) 2. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT DISTRICT : KAMRUP. IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE NO. 3, KAMRUP, GUWAHATI. PRESENT : SHRI S.N. SARMA, LLM,, AJS, Civil Judge No. 3, Kamrup,

More information

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, NAGAON.

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, NAGAON. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, NAGAON. PRESENT : Smti. H. D. Bhuyan, District Judge, Nagaon. MONEY APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2011 This Money Appeal is directed against the Order & Judgment and decree dated 16-12-2010

More information

MONEY SUIT NO.05 OF 2011

MONEY SUIT NO.05 OF 2011 District : MORIGAON. High Court Form No. (J) 2. Heading of Judgment in Original Suit IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF NO.1, MORIGAON. Present : N.C.BHUYAN, AJS, MUNSIFF NO.1, MORIGAON. Friday, the 5 th day of September,

More information

HIGH COURT FORM NO. (J) 2 HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF No.2,DARRANG at MANGALDAI

HIGH COURT FORM NO. (J) 2 HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF No.2,DARRANG at MANGALDAI HIGH COURT FORM NO. (J) 2 HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF No.2,DARRANG at MANGALDAI Present: Monoshreeporna Khound Munsiff No.2, Darrang at Mangaldai Thursday, the 22 nd day

More information

MONEY SUIT No. 09/2011./

MONEY SUIT No. 09/2011./ High Court Form No. (J) 7 HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN THE ORIGINAL SUIT IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE :::::::: HAILAKANDI District : Hailakandi. Present :- Sri N. Talukdar, AJS. Civil Judge, Hailakandi. MONEY

More information

Money Suit No. 80/2008. Raj Kumar Tomma Singh...Plaintiff. Dooars Transport Limited and 4 others...defendants

Money Suit No. 80/2008. Raj Kumar Tomma Singh...Plaintiff. Dooars Transport Limited and 4 others...defendants 1 HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT District: Kamrup (M) IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE NO.3, KAMRUP(M), GUWAHATI Present: Rajesh Kumar Todi, AJS, Civil Judge No.3, Kamrup (M), Guwahati Saturday, the 30

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDCITION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDCITION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Versus Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDCITION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8427 OF 2014 Ramesh Chand (Dead) through L.Rs. Appellant Versus Asruddin (Dead) through LRs and another Respondents

More information

Civil Revision No.38/2007

Civil Revision No.38/2007 Civil Revision No.38/2007 12.5.2015 Shri Navneet Dubey, counsel for the applicant. Heard on admission. Vide judgment and decree dated 31.8.2005, Second Civil Judge, Class-II, Panna in civil suit No.1-B/2005

More information

HIGH COURT FORM NO.(J) 2. HEADING OF JUDGMENT ON ORIGINAL APPEAL. IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, SONITPUR AT TEZPUR. MONEY APPEAL NO.

HIGH COURT FORM NO.(J) 2. HEADING OF JUDGMENT ON ORIGINAL APPEAL. IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, SONITPUR AT TEZPUR. MONEY APPEAL NO. Page 1 of 9 District : Sonitpur. HIGH COURT FORM NO.(J) 2. HEADING OF JUDGMENT ON ORIGINAL APPEAL. IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, SONITPUR AT TEZPUR. Present : Sri M.K. Kalita, AJS, District Judge,

More information

Bench: A Bhangale IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 467 /2009. Smt.Nanda w/o Dharam Nandanwar

Bench: A Bhangale IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 467 /2009. Smt.Nanda w/o Dharam Nandanwar Bench: A Bhangale 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 467 /2009 Smt.Nanda w/o Dharam Nandanwar Aged about 42 years, occu: Business Represented through

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA 24/2004 MC 1482/04 1. Shri Manik Chakraborty Son of Late Bijoy Chakraborty, R/o Rangapara Town, Ward No.

More information

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT DIBRUGARH. Money Appeal Case No. 1/2011.

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT DIBRUGARH. Money Appeal Case No. 1/2011. 1 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT DIBRUGARH Present : Sri A.B. Siddique, Addl. District Judge, Dibrugarh. Money Appeal Case No. 1/2011. Sri Bhupendra Singh,---------Appellant -Vs- Sri

More information

Money suit No. 314/2007( new) Money Suit NO. 252/1990(old ) HIGH COURT FORM No.( J) 2 HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT/CASE. District...

Money suit No. 314/2007( new) Money Suit NO. 252/1990(old ) HIGH COURT FORM No.( J) 2 HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT/CASE. District... 1 Money suit No. 314/2007( new) Money Suit NO. 252/1990(old ) HIGH COURT FORM No.( J) 2 HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT/CASE District...Kamrup In the Court of Munsiff No.2, Guwahati M/s Bajaj Electricals

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Date of Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Date of Judgment: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: 10.03.2011 RSA No. 92/2009 & CM Nos. 10095/2009 & 10096/2009 SH. RAJESH Through: Mr. Gurbhansh Singh, Advocate...Appellant

More information

N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act

N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act 1 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BARPETA. N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act Present : Md. Abdul Hakim, M.A.,LL.B., Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barpeta. Narayan Nath --- Complainant

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2003

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2003 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2003 COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM [CORAM: MUNUO J.A, MSOFFE, J.A, AND KAJI J.A ENGEN PETROLEUM (T) LTD.. APPELLANT VERSUS TANGANYIKA INVESTMENT OIL AND TRANSPORT

More information

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar.

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Page 1 HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Present :- Shri T.K.Bhattacharjee, A.J.S. Addl. District Judge, Cachar,Silchar.

More information

Form no. (J) 2. Heading of Judgment in original suit/ case In the original court of the Munsiff No 1, Nalbari

Form no. (J) 2. Heading of Judgment in original suit/ case In the original court of the Munsiff No 1, Nalbari 1 Form no. (J) 2 Heading of Judgment in original suit/ case In the original court of the Munsiff No 1, Nalbari Present: - Syeda Sabina Afzal Zinnat, AJS Dated: - 22nd September 2014 MONEY SUIT 21/2013

More information

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2014 [ Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2014 [ Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2402 OF 2014 [ Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.6197 of 2014] K. Subramani Appellant(s) versus K. Damodara Naidu

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10582 OF 2013 (arising out of SLP(C)No.27949 of 2012) VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10582 OF 2013 (arising out of SLP(C)No.27949 of 2012) VERSUS -1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10582 OF 2013 (arising out of SLP(C)No.27949 of 2012) SAROJ SUNDER SINGH & ORS. VERSUS APPELLANTS RESPONDENTS J

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.428/2006 (A)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.428/2006 (A) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.428/2006 (A) BETWEEN: Sri.M.Gopalappa, S/o Late

More information

THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO

THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB REGISTRY SAN FERNANDO H.C.A. No. S 2161 of 1986 H..C.A. No. S 2162 of 1986 H.C.A. No. S 2163 of 1986 H.C.A. No. S 2164 of 1986 BETWEEN

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Vs. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6620, 6621, 6622, 6623, 6624, 6627, 6628, 6629, 6630 & 6631 OF 2013

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Vs. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6620, 6621, 6622, 6623, 6624, 6627, 6628, 6629, 6630 & 6631 OF 2013 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.6619 OF 2013 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 33728 of 2011) M/s Tirupati Developers.Petitioner(s)

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Rutledge v. Ohio Dept. of Ins., 2006-Ohio-5013.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 87372 DARWIN C. RUTLEDGE PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

More information

TEDDY YOMENA vs S W MOTORS I 227/97

TEDDY YOMENA vs S W MOTORS I 227/97 TEDDY YOMENA vs S W MOTORS I 227/97 HEARD ON: 1997/02/06 DELIVERED ON: 1997/02/12 JUDGMENT Plaintiff gave a vehicle to Defendant to sell. Defendant sold vehicle but failed to pay the purchase price to

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5669 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.9516 of 2010) VERSUS JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5669 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.9516 of 2010) VERSUS JUDGMENT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5669 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.9516 of 2010) The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS Siby George

More information

MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT (CHAPTER 179, SECTION 254) MERCHANT SHIPPING (SHIPPING CASUALTIES, APPEALS AND REHEARINGS) RULES

MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT (CHAPTER 179, SECTION 254) MERCHANT SHIPPING (SHIPPING CASUALTIES, APPEALS AND REHEARINGS) RULES Arrangement of Provisions MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT (CHAPTER 179, SECTION 254) MERCHANT SHIPPING (SHIPPING CASUALTIES, APPEALS AND REHEARINGS) RULES [23 December 1910] 1 Citation. 2 Definitions. 3 Conduct

More information

Sri D. K. Kalita, A.J.S. Munsiff, Tihu

Sri D. K. Kalita, A.J.S. Munsiff, Tihu Form No. (J) 2 HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT/CASE DISTRICT : NALBARI IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, TIHU Present : Sri D. K. Kalita, A.J.S. Munsiff, Tihu Title Suit No. 02/14 Friday, the 8 th day of May,

More information

Rules for Bankruptcy Cases, B.E. 2542 (1999) Translation

Rules for Bankruptcy Cases, B.E. 2542 (1999) Translation Rules for Bankruptcy Cases, B.E. 2542 (1999) Translation By virtue of Section 19 of the Act for the Establishment of and Procedure for Bankruptcy Court B.E. 2542 (1999) the Chief Justice of the Central

More information

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar, In the court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar.

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar, In the court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. 1 of 6 HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar, In the court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Present:- Shri S.P.Moitra. A.J.S Addl. District Judge, Cachar,Silchar.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF vs. CASE NO. CV DEFENDANT DEFENDANT S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS COMES NOW, Defendant,

More information

Number 31 of 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Preliminary and General

Number 31 of 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Preliminary and General Number 31 of 2004 CIVIL LIABILITY AND COURTS ACT 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Preliminary and General Section 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3. Orders and regulations. 4. Service

More information

Small Claims: The Process in Detail

Small Claims: The Process in Detail What is a small claims division? Every justice court in Arizona has a small claims division to provide an inexpensive and speedy method for resolving most civil disputes that do not exceed $2,500. All

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3269-3270 OF 2007 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3269-3270 OF 2007 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC... REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3269-3270 OF 2007 MONTFORD BROTHERS OF ST. GABRIEL & ANR.... APPELLANTS VS. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC....

More information

IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE-CUM

IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE-CUM IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE-CUM CUM- ESI COURT, KHURDA AT BHUBANESWAR. Present: Dr. D.P. Choudhury, District Judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar. 1 21st Dated, Bhubaneswar the Jan.'15. E.S.I. Misc. Case

More information

Suits by or Against Persons in Military Service

Suits by or Against Persons in Military Service Ch. 6 Part A] CHAPTER 6 Suits by or Against Persons in Military Service Part A AMENABILITY TO THE CIVIL COURTS OF PERSONS SUBJECT TO MILITARY LAW 1. Jurisdiction of Civil Courts All persons belonging to

More information

TRADE MARK COMMITTEE REPORT INDIA 2012 BY HEMANT SINGH MOHAN VIDHANI JATIN TRIVEDI

TRADE MARK COMMITTEE REPORT INDIA 2012 BY HEMANT SINGH MOHAN VIDHANI JATIN TRIVEDI TRADE MARK COMMITTEE REPORT INDIA 2012 BY HEMANT SINGH MOHAN VIDHANI JATIN TRIVEDI 1. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN LAW: 1.1 There has been drastic upward revision in the court fee payable in Delhi in the suits,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923. FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923. FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008 DATE OF DECISION 19.03.2008 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.... Through: Appellant

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO CA 28. v. : T.C. NO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO CA 28. v. : T.C. NO [Cite as Kopp v. Begley, 2005-Ohio-1210.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO DAVID B. KOPP : Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO. 2004 CA 28 v. : T.C. NO. 03-675 DANA BEGLEY : (Civil Appeal

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No. 14-0420 Filed May 20, 2015. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Jeffrey A.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No. 14-0420 Filed May 20, 2015. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Jeffrey A. CHARLES EDWARD DAVIS, Applicant-Appellant, vs. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-0420 Filed May 20, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County,

More information

CHAPTER 5 THE GOVERNMENT PROCEEDINGS ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART II SUBSTANTIVE LAW

CHAPTER 5 THE GOVERNMENT PROCEEDINGS ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART II SUBSTANTIVE LAW CHAPTER 5 THE GOVERNMENT PROCEEDINGS ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section Title PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. PART II SUBSTANTIVE LAW 3. Liability

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014 GURCHARAN SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. N.K. Gupta, Advocate versus

More information

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING YOUR MODIFICATION OF CHILD SUPPORT

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING YOUR MODIFICATION OF CHILD SUPPORT INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING YOUR MODIFICATION OF CHILD SUPPORT A modification of child support is allowed if the parties can show a change in income or financial status. If the parties agreed on child support

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS WITH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS WITH 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD....APPELLANT VERSUS HILLI MULTIPURPOSE COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD...RESPONDENT

More information

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information

TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS Adopted by the Supreme Court of Texas Justice Court, Pct 1 1 of 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. GENERAL... 6 RULE 523. DISTRICT

More information

FILED August 17, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL

FILED August 17, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL NOTICE This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (4th 140825-U NO. 4-14-0825

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Hignite v. Glick, Layman & Assoc., Inc., 2011-Ohio-1698.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95782 DIANNE HIGNITE PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

More information

2012 IL App (1st) 120353-U. No. 1-12-0353 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2012 IL App (1st) 120353-U. No. 1-12-0353 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2012 IL App (1st) 120353-U FIFTH DIVISION September 28, 2012 No. 1-12-0353 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited

More information

Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014

Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 South Australia Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 SCHEDULE 3 APPROVED FORMS Schedule 3 Approved Forms relate to Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014, dated 2nd September 2014, that came

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SPARKASSE BREGENZ BANK AG. and. In The Matter of ASSOCIATED CAPITAL CORPORATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SPARKASSE BREGENZ BANK AG. and. In The Matter of ASSOCIATED CAPITAL CORPORATION BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CIVIL APPEAL NO.10 OF 2002 BETWEEN: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SPARKASSE BREGENZ BANK AG and In The Matter of ASSOCIATED CAPITAL CORPORATION Appellant Respondent Before: His Lordship,

More information

Defendant, by and through his attorneys LENOIR LAW FIRM, answering the complaint of plaintiff, upon information and belief,

Defendant, by and through his attorneys LENOIR LAW FIRM, answering the complaint of plaintiff, upon information and belief, CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS -----------------------------------X Index No. CV-079576-10/QU LR CREDIT 21, LLC ANSWER Plaintiff, Kenneth Chow - against - Defendant. -----------------------------------X

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT VAN WERT COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 15-08-05

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT VAN WERT COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 15-08-05 [Cite as Carter-Jones Lumber Co. v. Jewell, 2008-Ohio-4782.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT VAN WERT COUNTY THE CARTER-JONES LUMBER CO., dba CARTER LUMBER CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE

More information

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.27243 OF 2015)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.27243 OF 2015) REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.27243 OF 2015) MALATI SARDAR PETITIONER VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

Chapter 14:14 MONEYLENDING AND RATES OF INTEREST ACT. Acts 9/1930, 25/1948,59/1961,6/1967, 7/1972, 5/1981, 30/1984, 22/2001; 16/2004. R.G.N. 554/1962.

Chapter 14:14 MONEYLENDING AND RATES OF INTEREST ACT. Acts 9/1930, 25/1948,59/1961,6/1967, 7/1972, 5/1981, 30/1984, 22/2001; 16/2004. R.G.N. 554/1962. Section Chapter 14:14 MONEYLENDING AND RATES OF INTEREST ACT Acts 9/1930, 25/1948,59/1961,6/1967, 7/1972, 5/1981, 30/1984, 22/2001; 16/2004. R.G.N. 554/1962. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Short title. 2.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RUDOLPH V. BAILEY, SR., Plaintiff Below- Appellant, v. ACME/ASCO/ALBERTSON S INC., Defendant Below- Appellee. No. 322, 2007 Court Below Superior Court of the

More information

2015 IL App (1st) 142304-U. No. 1-14-2304 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2015 IL App (1st) 142304-U. No. 1-14-2304 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2015 IL App (1st 142304-U SECOND DIVISION May 5, 2015 No. 1-14-2304 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

CASE NO. 1D Joseph Poklemba and Manuel Santiago Hiraldo of Blank Rome LLP, Boca Raton, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Joseph Poklemba and Manuel Santiago Hiraldo of Blank Rome LLP, Boca Raton, for Appellant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. As Trustee for the Holders of SASCO 2007-MLN1, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

More information

TO BE PREPARED ON Rs. 200/- stamp paper INDEMNITY BOND. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT on this day of. Year 20 I. d/o or s/o

TO BE PREPARED ON Rs. 200/- stamp paper INDEMNITY BOND. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT on this day of. Year 20 I. d/o or s/o TO BE PREPARED ON Rs. 200/- stamp paper INDEMNITY BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT on this day of Year 20 I d/o or s/o having permanent place of residence at and currently residing at (herein after

More information

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, MALKIYAH S. GOLDBERG f/k/a NEKERIA Q.

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, MALKIYAH S. GOLDBERG f/k/a NEKERIA Q. UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 0332 September Term, 2012 MALKIYAH S. GOLDBERG f/k/a NEKERIA Q. JENKINS-GRAHAM v. EDWARD R. GRAHAM Meredith, Graeff, Moylan, Charles E., Jr. (Retired,

More information

FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE

FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE 33 U.S.C. 3729-33 FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE 31 U.S.C. 3729. False claims (a) LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN ACTS. (1) IN GENERAL. Subject to paragraph (2), any person who (A) knowingly presents, or causes

More information

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014 Dhropadabai and Others Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Technocraft Toolings Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Dipak

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2010. :Versus: J U D G M E N T

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2010. :Versus: J U D G M E N T 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2010 State of Madhya Pradesh Appellant :Versus: Anoop Singh Respondent J U D G M E N T Pinaki Chandra

More information

The Court of Protection Rules 2007

The Court of Protection Rules 2007 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2007 No. 1744 (L. 12) MENTAL CAPACITY, ENGLAND AND WALES The Court of Protection Rules 2007 Made - - - - - 25th June 2007 Laid before Parliament 4th July 2007 Coming into force -

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 07-1019 APEX DIGITAL, INC., v. Plaintiff-Appellant, SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District

More information

Civil Suits: The Process

Civil Suits: The Process Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized

More information

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings. SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No. 57/2002 1. Bahadur Ali.. Appellants Son of Late Batasu Munshi, Village : Bonbahar, Mouza : Betbari, P.O.

More information

Appeal from the District Court for Dodge County: Geoffrey

Appeal from the District Court for Dodge County: Geoffrey VLACH v. VLACH 141 Ronald G. Vlach, appellant, v. Rhonda K. Vlach, appellee. N.W.2d Filed June 21, 2013. No. S-12-866. 1. Declaratory Judgments: Appeal and Error. When a declaratory judgment action presents

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION JOHN FRAZIER HUNT, : DECEMBER TERM, 2004 Plaintiff, : No. 2742 v. : (Commerce Program) NATIONAL

More information

1 No TDS on interest payable for delay in payment of purchase price of goods [Published in 338 ITR (Jour) 57 (Part-5)] - By S.K.

1 No TDS on interest payable for delay in payment of purchase price of goods [Published in 338 ITR (Jour) 57 (Part-5)] - By S.K. 1 No TDS on interest payable for delay in payment of purchase price of goods [Published in 338 ITR (Jour) 57 (Part-5)] - By S.K.Tyagi Of late, in a number of cases, an issue has arisen whether tax is deductible

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY. Date of Decision : July 16, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY. Date of Decision : July 16, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of Decision : July 16, 2012 CS(OS) 3339/2011 [SUIT UNDER ORDER XXXVII CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908] GE CAPITAL SERVICES INDIA Through:

More information

HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, GOLAGHAT. Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010.

HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, GOLAGHAT. Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010. Mrs. Manju Gohain.... Complainant. Vs. 1. The General Manager, Bajaj Allianz

More information

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405. CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply

More information

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 110 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDWARD ZYBURO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, NCSPLUS

More information

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS REL: 03/25/2011 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges. FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit WILLIAM MOSHER; LYNN MOSHER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT November 19, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk

More information

Guide to Small Claims Court

Guide to Small Claims Court Page 1 of 9 Guide to Small Claims Court 1. Introduction 2. What is Small Claims Court? 3. Who Can Sue and What Can You Sue About? 4. Before You Sue 5. When Must a Lawyer Represent Me in Small Claims? 6.

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT CRISTOBAL COLON, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. Case No.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD... Appellant Through : Mr D.D. Singh with Mr

More information

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.359 of 2007

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.359 of 2007 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.359 of 2007 Date of institution : 09.03.2007 Date of decision : 02.04.2012 The Ferozepur Primary

More information

RULE 49 OFFER TO SETTLE

RULE 49 OFFER TO SETTLE RULE 49 OFFER TO SETTLE DEFINITIONS 49.01 In Rules 49.02 to 49.14, (a) "defendant" includes a respondent; (b) "plaintiff" includes an applicant. WHERE AVAILABLE 49.02 (1) A party to a proceeding may serve

More information

Filing a Small Claims Complaint: Guidelines and Forms

Filing a Small Claims Complaint: Guidelines and Forms Filing a Small Claims Complaint: Guidelines and Forms These are basic guidelines relating to a small claims action. Neither the Judge nor the Clerk can provide legal advice or interpretation of law as

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. - versus AND. - versus. MR KAMLESH JAIN & OTHERS...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. - versus AND. - versus. MR KAMLESH JAIN & OTHERS... IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment delivered on: 06.03.2009 IA 1941/2006 in CS(OS) 328/2006 M/S KOXAN INDIA Plaintiff - versus RAMESH MARDIA & OTHERS... Defendants

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.382/2015 Date of Reserve: 07.09.2015 Date of Decision: 18.09.2015. versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.382/2015 Date of Reserve: 07.09.2015 Date of Decision: 18.09.2015. versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.382/2015 Date of Reserve: 07.09.2015 Date of Decision: 18.09.2015 DEEPAK BHATIA Through:... Petitioner Mr.Randhir Jain and Mr.Dhananjai Jain, Advocates.

More information

T E X A S Y O U N G L A W Y E R S A S S O C I A T I O N A N D S T A T E B A R O F T E X A S G UIDE T O C O URT

T E X A S Y O U N G L A W Y E R S A S S O C I A T I O N A N D S T A T E B A R O F T E X A S G UIDE T O C O URT T E X A S Y O U N G L A W Y E R S A S S O C I A T I O N A N D S T A T E B A R O F T E X A S G UIDE T O T RAFFIC C O URT A G UIDE T O T RAFFIC C O URT Prepared and distributed as a Public Service by the

More information

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT D E C I S I O N. Rendered on December 28, 2012

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT D E C I S I O N. Rendered on December 28, 2012 [Cite as City of Columbus, Div. of Taxation v. Moses, 2012-Ohio-6199.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT City of Columbus, Division of Taxation, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 12AP-266

More information

v. VERIFIED ANSWER TO FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT

v. VERIFIED ANSWER TO FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF v. Plaintiff, Index No. VERIFIED ANSWER TO FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT Defendant(s). Defendant answers as follows: I generally deny each allegation of the Complaint,

More information

No. 48,259-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *

No. 48,259-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * Judgment rendered June 26, 2013. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 48,259-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * SABINE

More information

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. DISTRICT COURT SIXTH DIVISION THOMAS A. PALANGIO D/B/A : CONSUMER AUTO SALES : : v. : A.A. No. 11-093 : DAVID M. SULLIVAN, TAX : ADMINISTRATOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, 3 RD MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BHUBANESWAR.

IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, 3 RD MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BHUBANESWAR. 1 IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, 3 RD MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BHUBANESWAR. PRRESENT:- Shri I.K. Das, LLB, Member, 3 rd MACT, Bhubaneswar. MACT Case No. 651 of 2002 Date of argument- Dt. 14.11.13 Date

More information

CHAPTER XV. Applications under Article 226, 227 and 228 of the Constitution and Rules for the issue of writs under the said Articles

CHAPTER XV. Applications under Article 226, 227 and 228 of the Constitution and Rules for the issue of writs under the said Articles CHAPTER XV Applications under Article 226, 227 and 228 of the Constitution and Rules for the issue of writs under the said Articles (Except writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus) 1(a) An application for

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ) No. ED99989 ) Respondent, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of vs. ) Cape Girardeau County ) RONALD DUFF d/b/a

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2770 OF 2013 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2770 OF 2013 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.2770 OF 2013 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.355 OF 2010) Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Versus Rama Chandrashekhar

More information

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BARPETA

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BARPETA BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BARPETA PRESENT Sri A.F.A. BORA, (A.J.S.) MEMBER, M.A.C.T, BARPETA. M.A.C. Case No. 239/2013 1. Anjuwara Khatun... Claimant No. 1 2. Md. Jabed Ali...

More information