1 A Registry of Pre-K to 3 rd Grade Programs Human Capital Research Collaborative, University of Minnesota We are grateful to the Foundation for Child Development for funding the development of this Registry.
2 Overview of Pk-3 Registry Although many registries and clearinghouses of effective programs exist, none focus on prekindergarten to third grade (Pk- 3) programs and practices. Given the increased public and research interest in better integrating early childhood and school-age programs, the Registry of Pk-3 Programs was developed to describe promising and proven approaches for enhancing children s school performance and well-being.
3 Organization 1. Background 2. Registries of Social Programs 3. Criteria for Pk-3 programs 4. Research Evidence 5. Implications and Recommendations 6. Example: Midwest Child-Parent Center Expansion 7. Examples of Promising State and Local Initiatives 8. Resources of Evidence
4 1. Background
5 Early Schooling Trends 1. Less than half of children enter Kindergarten fully ready succeed. 2. Preschool impacts are frequently found to drop off over time. 3. Third and fourth grade underachievement is the norm in U.S. schools. 4. Most previous efforts to strengthen continuity from preschool to 3 rd grade have not had sustained effects.
6 Reading Proficiency Gap Goal: 75% Proficient (4 th gr., 2011 NAEP) U. S. Children: 32% Current gap to goal 43 pts. Impact of effective Pre-K: 15 pts. Reduction in gap: 35% Remaining gap: 28 pts.
7 Paths of Change for PK-3 Programs Prek Comprehensive Program Model 3 rd School & Program Context Early Childhood Experience, Ages 3 to 4 A School-Ready Proficiency Language Math Social-emotional _ Science Health/Arts B Early School Achievement, Performance, & Adjustment C High School Graduation Timing Duration Intensity Instruction Family services K-3 services Alignment Small classes Prof. development School continuity
8 2. Registries of Social Programs
9 Scope We identified 14 relevant registries and clearinghouses that identify effective programs for children and families. The 4 federallysponsored and funded ones are: National Registry of Effective Programs and Practices (NREPP) What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Registry (OJJP) Interagency Working Group on Youth Programs (Findyouthinfo.gov)
10 Evidence to Consider Program Models Specific programs Designed to determine impacts Populations at risk Systems Approaches Capacity building General elements informed by research Broader implementation
11 National Registry of Effective Programs & Practices (NREPP) Quality of Research Reliability of Measures Validity of Measures Intervention Fidelity Missing Data and Attrition Potential Confounding Variables Appropriateness of Analysis Readiness for Dissemination Availability of implementation materials Availability of training and support resources Availability of quality assurance procedures
12 What Works Clearinghouse Focus on rigor of analysis: Randomized Trials Low Attrition Group Equivalence Evidence of Effect
13 Evaluation Summaries What Works Clearinghouse
14 Classification of Effectiveness
15 3. Criteria for Pk-3 Programs
16 Four Domains of Criteria We defined 15 criteria of effectiveness in 4 domains: (a) Design, (b) Execution, (c) Impacts, and (d) Scalability.
17 Criteria for Evidence Registry A. Design 1. Conceptual framework 2. Study design rigor 3. External validity 4. Measurement validity B. Execution 5. Implementation fidelity 6. Service dosage and quality 7. Missing data and attrition 8. Control group monitoring
18 Criteria for Evidence Registry C. Impacts 9. Effect sizes 10. Sustained effects 11. Generative mechanisms 12. Economic benefits D. Scalability 13. Feasibility 14. Readiness for dissemination 15. Capacity for sustainability
19 Select Definitions 1. Conceptual framework: Theory of change is described and is adequate to address goals and outcomes 2. Study design rigor: Design type, group comparability, contrasts, analysis of confounds 3. External validity: Sample attributes, program attributes, scale, and cost 4. Measurement validity: Reliability, validity, and appropriateness to goals 5. Implementation fidelity: Adherence of program plan 6. Service dosage and quality: Quantity and quality
20 Select Definitions 7. Feasibility: Acceptability to stakeholders, alignment to current initiatives and priorities, and costs 8. Readiness for dissemination: Availability of implementation guides, technical and implementation support, and quality assurance procedures 9. Capacity for sustainability: Organizational capacity, leadership support, cost, and mechanism for financing
21 Scale of Evidence for Criteria 0 = No evidence or insufficient 2 = Moderate evidence with limitations 4 = Strong or extensive evidence Scale points of 1 and 3 are possible but fractions are not.
22 Domain Summary Category Range Minimum evidence Design 0 to 16 8 Execution 0 to 16 8 Impact 0 to 16 8 Scalability 0 to 12 6 Total 0 to 60 30
23 Classification of Evidence Not interpretable: Not effective: Promising: Effective: Very Effective: Design and execution do not meet minimum levels. No positive evidence interpretable as an effect. Some positive evidence. Sizable positive evidence with a consistent pattern. Consistently positive evidence that endures for two or more years
24 Control Group Contrasts: Prek-3 vs: 1. Prek only (Value added) 2. School-age only (Value added) 3. Less extensive (Dosage threshold) 4. NonPrek-3 (Dosage threshold) 5. Years of service (Gradient) 6. No participation (Synergy) 7. Usual local services (Synergy)
25 4. Research Evidence
26 Defining Strategies Programs Planned interventions and services beginning during any of the first 5 years of life and continue up to third grade Practices Elements of PK-3 programs such as preschool, full-day kindergarten, class sizes, curriculum alignment, parent involvement.
27 PK-3 Program Goals Promote continuity in learning Improve school transition Enable synergy of preschool, kindergarten, and early school experiences Help prevent fade in effect of preschool
28 History of PK-3 programs and studies Follow Through, 1968 Chicago Child-Parent Centers, 1968 Project Developmental Continuity, 1974 Carolina Abecedarian Project, 1977 Head Start-Public School Transition Demonstration Project, 1991
29 Classification of PK-3 Approaches Classification Case Management School Organizational Comprehensive Services Instructional Reforms Single Practices Example Head Start Transition; Abecedarian Project Small classes; PK-3 schools Child-Parent Centers; Proj. Devel. Continuity Follow Through Full- Day K; Parent Involvement, PD
30 Classification Continued Classification Systems coordination, alignment Example Montgomery County, MD; Bremerton District, WA
31 Meta-Analysis Findings for Behaviors & Experiences Relevant for Pk-3 Effect size Duration Prekindergarten.26 Variable Full-day K.17 Short Small classes, K-3.19 Short Parent involvement Variable Frequent school moves -.30 > 2 yrs
32 Inclusion Criteria for Studies To be included in the registry analysis, program studies were required to meet all of the following criteria: 1.Program was designed as a Pk-3 intervention. 2. A comparison group was defined a priori 3. Evidence was reported through the end of the program (Grade 3 or beyond) 4. Contrast of Pk-3 participation versus comparison condition was well defined.
33 Number of Studies Identified Carolina Abecedarian Project 3 Head Start/Follow Through 4 Chicago Child-Parent Centers 8 National Head Start Transition Project 4
34 Reviewed Studies The ratings included in the registry are based on the program study with the most complete evidence. Effect sizes are reported in standard deviations. Effect sizes of 0.20 or higher in absolute value are considered practically significant although lower values can still be meaningful.
35 Follow Through: Instructional Reform Age 8-9 Age Direct Instruction (n = 2,004) High/Scope (n = 807) Bank Street (n = 61)
36 Abecedarian Project: Case Management (N = 49) Outcome Effect size Age 8 reading/math.25 Age 15 math.10 Special education.24 High school completion.03
37 Chicago Child-Parent Centers (CPC) CPC-1 Original model, 1967; Fuerst & Fuerst, 1993; Conrad & Eash, 1983 CPC-2 Updated Model, began in mid 1970s; Chicago Longitudinal Study Developed and implemented by Chicago Public Schools through Title I funding
38 Child-Parent Centers Child-Parent Center Preschool/Kindergarten (Wing or Building) Head Teacher Principal Elementary School Grades 1 to 3 Curriculum Parent-Resources Teacher Outreach Services Parent Component Curriculum Component Health Services Parent Component Curriculum Component School-Wide Services School-Community Representative Resource Mobilization Home Visitation Parent Conferences Parent Resource Teacher Parent Room Activities Classroom Volunteering School Activities Home Support Language Focus Small Class Sizes Inservice Training Health Screening Nursing Services Free + Reduced- Price meals Parent Room Activities Classroom Volunteering School Activities Home Support Reduced Class Size Teacher Aides Instructional Materials Individualized Instruction Inservice Training Health Services School-Community Representative Free + Reduced- Price meals Resource Mobilization Age 3 To Age 9
39 CPC, Original: Comprehensive Examined 684 children of the original 6 CPCs with 4 or more years vs. 2 different control schools Outcome ES Grade 8 reading/math achievement.33 High school graduation (62% vs 49%).33 Fuerst & Fuerst, 1993
40 Chicago Longitudinal Study, CPC CPC Intervention Comparison Sample Complete cohort Random sample of K sites + 6 CPC areas Recovery, by age of 989 (90%) 480 of 550 (87%) Key attributes Reside in highest poverty areas Mean no. of risks = 4.5; 73% with 4 or more risks Reside in high poverty areas Had school-based enrichment Mean no. of risks = 4.5; 71% with 4 or more risks Intervention levels Preschool 100% 1 or 2 years 15% in Head Start Kindergarten 60% full day 100% full day School age 69% 1 year 56% 2-3 years 7% 1 year 23% 2-3 years
41 National Percentile CPC Preschool and Readiness Two Years One Year None Nat. Norm
42 Test Scores Reading Achievement over Time by Extended Program Groups P+K P+K+SA Nat. Norm Ages
43 Effect Sizes, Pk-3 Relative to 3 or Fewer Years of Service Outcome ES Grade 3 achievement.52 Grade 6-8 achievement.38 Remediation by Grade High school graduation.35 High school completion.14
44 Head Start Transition (Case Management, Comprehensive) Outcome ES Grade 3 Reading.10 Grade 3 Math.07 Special education services.18 Rate of MR -.13 Rate of emotional disturb. -.12
45 Ratings for 4 Studies A. Design FT ABC CP1 CP2 1. Conceptual framework Study design rigor External validity Measurement validity B. Execution 5. Implementation fidelity Service dosage and quality Missing data and attrition Control group monitoring
46 Ratings Continued C. Impacts FT ABC CP1 CP2 9. Effect sizes Sustained effects Generative mechan Economic benefits D. Scalability 13. Feasibility Readiness for dissem Capacity for sustain
47 Additional Ratings (Head Start Transition) A. Design HST 1. Conceptual framework 3 2. Study design rigor 3 3. External validity 4 4. Measurement validity 2 B. Execution 5. Implementation fidelity 2 6. Service dosage and quality 2 7. Missing data and attrition 1 8. Control group monitoring 0
48 Additional Ratings Continued C. Impacts HST 9. Effect sizes Sustained effects Generative mechan Economic benefits 0 D. Scalability 13. Feasibility Readiness for dissem Capacity for sustain. 2
49 Summary of Four Programs Total Score Met Minimum Follow Through 35 Yes Abecedarian 35 Yes CPC-1, Original 33 Yes CPC-2, Later 54 Yes Head Start Trans. 24 No
50 Classification of Effectiveness Program Follow Through Classification Effective Abecedarian Project Promising Child-Parent Centers Very Effective Head Start Transition Not interpretable
51 Limitations of Evidence 1. Inconsistent control group definitions 2. Insufficient assessment of added value 3. Attrition and group comparability not fully assessed 4. Limited longitudinal follow up to high school 5. Tested programs had low comprehensiveness and dosage 6. Smaller samples
52 5. Implications & Recommendations
53 Conclusion Overall, Pk-3 interventions have demonstrated positive evidence of benefits on child outcomes above and beyond the impact of Prek alone. Only the comprehensive-service Child-Parent Center Program is rated as very effective. Evidence from other programs are more mixed but show effectiveness on some outcomes.
54 Implications/Recommendations 1. Increase investments in PK-3 research and services (e.g., family support, and curriculum alignment. 2. Use criteria of effectiveness to better prioritize funding and reforms. 3. Implement CPC PK-3 more widely as evidence-based program.
55 Implications/Recommendations 4. Develop funding mechanisms to support timely implementation of proven program and practices. 5. Establish key principles of effectiveness to guide program development and funding priority. 6. Link funding at different levels to registries of effectiveness.
56 Implications/Recommendations 7. Develop cross-agency funding plans for programs and approaches that impact broader well-being. 8. Require Pre-K programs to develop plan to sustain or strengthen learning gains. 9. Require 10% of Title I go to evidencebased K-3 services linked to Pre-K.
57 6. Example: Midwest Child-Parent Center Expansion
58 Summary A scale up of the Chicago Child-Parent Center Pk-3 Program in 32 centers and schools in Illinois and Minnesota beginning in fall The expansion follows a Prek cohort for 5 years until third grade and is funded by the U. S. Department of Education s Investing in Innovation Program. Web site:
59 CPC Core Elements Collab. Leadership HT, PRT, SCR with Principal Effective Learning Curric. Alignment Class size, Length, Balance Plan completed, integration Parent Involvement Plan completed, assessment Prof. Development Modules, On-line, Facilitation Continuity & Stability 80%+ continuity plus instructional supports
60 Refinements 1. Full-day Pre-K in many sites. 2. Menu-based parent involvement and curriculum plans endorsed by principals. 3. PD system & site support instead of fulltime curriculum coordinators. 4. Broader context including communitybased sites. 5. On-going assessment and data collection on key elements.
61 Research Design 26 program Prek sites in five districts will implement starting in fall Primarily Title I schools in high-need areas. 2,400 preschool participants will be followed to third grade 23 control sites matched to program schools based on propensity scores of school, family, and child attributes. Assessments of children will be in preschool, kindergarten, and up to third grade.
62 CPC PreK Picture: Minnesota Illinois CPC Pre-k St. Paul Virginia Chicago Normal Evanston / Skokie Total # Pre-k Sites # Classrooms # Full-day # Children Note: No. of children based on fall 2012 data. Most classrooms were part-day. 13 of 26 sites offered full-day Pre-k.
63 Sites by Organization 9 co-located in elementary school 9 in close-by centers adjacent to school 8 in community-based sites 2+ blocks from school (2 are child care centers)
64 Chicago Predictors of Attendance VARIABLES Attendance Rate Chronic Absence Free Lunch year olds * Full Day 0.045*** -0.14*** The most important predictor is full day status, with students from full day programs significantly higher attendance rates and significantly less likely to be chronically absent.
65 7. Examples of Promising State and Local Initiatives
66 PK-3 in Wisconsin PK-3 Practice Teacher Training Curriculum Alignment Student-Teacher Ratio Wrap Around Services (transportation, out-of-school activities, summertime learning) 4K, SAGE and WECCP SAGE, WMELS WMELS 20:2 PK & 15:1 SAGE WECCP Evaluations Parent Involvement Resource Mobilization Funding Co-Location Limited WECCP WECCP State funding formula; State Often with 4K, but not always
67 PK-3 in Montgomery County Public Schools (Maryland) PK-3 Practice Teacher Training Curriculum Alignment MCPS Student-Teacher Ratio 15:1 for K-3 Wrap Around Services (transportation, out-of-school activities, summertime learning) Evaluations of the Program Parent Involvement Resource Mobilization Funding Limited Encouraged; not mandatory Through state funding formula Co-Location
68 8. Resources of Evidence
69 Carolina Abecedarian Project Campbell, F. A., & Ramey, C. T. (1995). Cognitive and school outcomes for high-risk African-American students at middle adolescence: Positive effects of early intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 32, Ramey, C. T., Campbell, F. A., Burchinal, M., Skinner, M. L., Gardner, D. M. & Ramey, S. L., (2000). Persistent effects of early childhood education on high-risk children and their mothers. Applied Developmental Science, 4, Campbell, F. A., Ramey, C. T., Pungello, E., Sparling, J., & Miller- Johnson, S. (2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the Abecedarian project. Applied Developmental Science, 6(1),
70 Head Start/Follow Through Becker, W. C. & Gersten, R. (1982). A follow-up of Follow Through: The later effects of the Direct Instruction model on children in fifth and sixth grades. American Educational Research Journal, 19, Schweinhart, L. J. & Wallgren, C. R. (1993). Effects of a Follow Through program on achievement. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 8, Abelson, W. B., Zigler, E., & DeBlasi, C. L. (1974). Effects of a four-year Follow Through program on economically disadvantaged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, Seitz, V., Apfel, N. H., Rosenbaum, L. K., & Zigler, E. (1983). Long-term effects of projects Head Start and Follow Through: The New Haven Project. In Consortium for Longitudinal Studies (Ed.). As the twig is bent: Lasting effects of preschool programs (pp ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71 Chicago Child-Parent Centers Conrad, K.J., & Eash, M.J. (1983). Measuring implementation and multiple outcomes in a Child-Parent Center compensatory education program. American Educational Research Journal, 20, Fuerst, J.S., & Fuerst, D. (1993). Chicago experience with an early childhood program: The special case of the Child-Parent Center program. Urban Education, 28, Reynolds, A.J. (1994). Effects of a preschool plus follow-on intervention for children at risk. Developmental Psychology, 30, Reynolds, A. J. (2000). Success in early intervention: The Chicago Child- Parent Centers. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Reynolds, A. J. Temple, J. A., White, B., Ou, S. & Robertson, D. L. (2011). Age-26 cost-benefit analysis of the Child-Parent Center early education program. Child Development, 82(1),
72 Chicago Child-Parent Centers (Continued) Reynolds, A. J. Temple, J. A., Ou, S., Robertson, D. L., Mersky,.J. P., Topitzes, J. W. & Niles, M. D. (2007). Effects of a school-based, early childhood intervention on adult health and well being: A 19-Year follow-up of low-income families. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161(8), Reynolds, A.J., Temple, J.A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2001). Longterm effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, Reynolds, A. J., & Temple, J. A. (1998). Extended early childhood intervention and school achievement: Age 13 findings from the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 69,
73 Head Start/Public School Transition Demonstration Project Bryant, D. M. et al. (1998). What is participation in North Carolina s Head Start Transition Demonstration? Summary of Conference Proceedings of Head Start s Fourth National Research Conference. Washington, DC: ACYF. Ramey, S. L., Ramey, C. T., & Lanzi, R. G. (2004). The transition to school: Building on preschool foundations and preparing for lifelong learning. In E. Zigler & S. J. Syfco (Eds), The Head Start debates ( ). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Ramey, S. L., Ramey, C. T., Phillips, M. M., Lanzi, R.G., Brezausek, C., Katholi, C. R., et al., (2000). Head Start Children s Entry into Public School: A Report on the National Head Start/Public School Early Childhood Transition Demonstration Study. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, DHHS. Redden, S. C., Forness, S. R., Ramey, S. L., Ramey, C. T., Brezausek, C. M. & Kavale, K.A. (2001). Children at risk: Effects of a four-year Head Start Transition Program on special education identification. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10(2),
74 Further Reading Bogard, K., & Takanishi, R. (1995). An aligned and coordinated approach to education for children 3 to 8 year old. Social Policy Report, XIX, No. III. Washington, DC: SRCD. House, E. R. et al. (1978). No simple answer. Critique of the Follow Through evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 48, Human Capital Research Collaborative. (2012). Midwest Child-Parent Center Expansion Project, Prek to 3 rd Grade. Guidelines and requirements. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota. Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., et al. (2003). What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58, O Connell, M. E., Boat, T., & Warner, K. E. (Eds.). (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
75 Further Reading (Continued) Reynolds, A. J. & Temple, J. A. (2008). Cost-effective early childhood development programs from preschool to third grade. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, Reynolds, A. J. (2003). The added value of continuing early intervention into the primary grades. In A. J. Reynolds, M. C. Wang, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Early childhood programs for a new century (pp ). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America. Reynolds, A. J., Magnuson, K. & Ou, S. (2010). PK-3 programs and practices: A review of research. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, Rhine, W. R. (Ed.). (1981). Making schools more effective: New Directions from Follow Through. New York: Academic Press. Takanishi, R., & Kauerz, K. (2008, March). PK inclusion: Getting serious about a P- 16 education system. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(7),
Critical Appraisals PK-3 Education: Programs and Practices that Work in Children s First Decade Arthur Reynolds University of Minnesota Katherine Magnuson University of Wisconsin-Madison Suh-Ruu Ou University
DISCUSSION PAPER 105 AUGUST 2006 PK-3 EDUCATION: PROGRAMS AND PRACTICES THAT WORK IN CHILDREN S FIRST DECADE Arthur Reynolds, University of Minnesota Katherine Magnuson, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Critical Appraisals Interpreting The Index of Child Well-Being PK-3: What Is It and How Do We Know It Works? Bill Graves FCD Policy Brief Advancing PK-3 No. Four May 2006 Page 2 PK-3: What Is It and How
The Effects of Early Education on Children in Poverty Anna D. Johnson Doctor of Education Student Developmental Psychology Department of Human Development Teachers College, Columbia University Introduction
SAMPLE RESOLUTION Early Childhood Education Draft Board Resolution How To Use This Resolution California s new school funding law, (the Local Control Funding Formula or LCFF) provides an opportunity for
Helping Children Get Started Right: The Benefits of Early Childhood Intervention By Craig Ramey R amey s Abecedarian Project compared infants from low-income families who were randomly assigned to a high-quality
The Science and Future of Early Childhood Education (ECE) Craig T. Ramey, Ph.D. & Sharon L. Ramey, Ph.D. Distinguished Scholars of Human Development and Professors of Psychology, Pediatrics & Psychiatry
Benefits of Preschool for All Research on the Benefits of Preschool Education: Securing High Returns from Preschool for All Children January 10, 2006 New York, NY W. Steven Barnett, Ph.D. National Institute
Benefit-Cost Studies of Four Longitudinal Early Childhood Programs: An Overview as Basis for a Working Knowledge There have been four studies that have most frequently been cited in the early childhood
9 Larry Schweinhart is an early childhood program researcher and speaker throughout the United States and in other countries. He has conducted research at the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper no. 1245-02 Age 21 Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers Arthur J. Reynolds School of Social Work Waisman Center Institute
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR STUDENTS PLACED AT RISK, 11(2), 175 198 Copyright 2006, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Early Childhood Intervention and Educational Attainment: Age 22 Findings From the Chicago
Developing an Early Childhood and Education Program: Implications from a Family Impact Analysis of the Child-Parent Center Program 2012 Stephanie Eddy Policy Institute for Family Impact Seminars Abstract
RESEARCH BRIEF Theodore P. Cross and Jesse J. Helton December 2010 Young children who have been maltreated are at substantial risk developmentally, both because of the abuse or neglect they have suffered
Early Childhood Education: A Call to Action from the Business Community Why America Needs High-Quality Early Childhood Education Over the past two decades, business leaders have invested time, expertise,
Impacts of early childhood programs Research Brief #4: Model Early Childhood Programs BY: JULIA ISAACS what are model early childhood programs? Much of the support for early childhood interventions comes
Topic School completion Preschool Education and School Completion SUH-RUU OU, PhD & ARTHUR J. REYNOLDS, PhD Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA (Published online February 25, 2004) Introduction
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY QUALITY COUNTS WORKFORCE STUDY Miami-Dade Quality Counts Wo r k f o r c e Study Early Care and Education Research to Practice Brief May 2014 1 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY QUALITY COUNTS WORKFORCE
Children with Disabilities and Other Special Needs: Opportunities to Participate in Quality Programs Must Be Expanded Families who have children with disabilities or other special needs face many challenges,
Presentation Slides EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION: INVESTING IN THE FUTURE William T. Gormley, Jr. Georgetown University Family Impact Seminar Jefferson City, Mo., March 25, 2014 10 THE CASE FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD
WHY INVESTMENT IN EARLY EDUCATION MATTERS Pennsylvania Association for the Education of Young Children A child's brain develops so rapidly in their first years, it's almost impossible for us to imagine.
POLICY BRIEF: The Importance of Aligning Pre-K through 3 rd Grade A high-quality early education provides the foundation for children s success in school. Research shows that participation in a high-quality
Improving Educational and Economic Achievement with Targeted Early Childhood Education Craig T. Ramey, Ph.D. Families First Summit: Tallahassee can be Best for Babies and Business Florida State University,
1 The Chicago Longitudinal Study: A Study of Children in the Chicago Public Schools 1 Arthur J. Reynolds, Director August 1999 The Chicago Longitudinal Study (CLS; Reynolds, 1991, 1999; Reynolds, Bezruczko,
DEFINING PRESCHOOL QUALITY: THE IMPORTANCE OF HIGHLY-QUALIFED TEACHERS Caitlyn Sharrow Education Law and Policy I. Introduction In recent years more research and attention has been paid to early childhood
Child Development, September/October 2004, Volume 75, Number 5, Pages 1299 1328 Paths of Effects of Early Childhood Intervention on Educational Attainment and Delinquency: A Confirmatory Analysis of the
Investing in Effective Early Education: Getting New York Back on a Path to Success Steve Barnett, PhD Why invest in ECE? First 5 years lay foundations for later success: Language and academic abilities
25 Long-Term Effects of Early Childhood Programs on Cognitive and School Outcomes W. Steven Barnett Abstract The extent to which early childhood programs produce long-term benefits in children s cognitive
SCHOOL READINESS School Readiness and International Developments in Early Childhood Education and Care Sheila B. Kamerman, DSW Compton Foundation Centennial Professor for the Prevention of Children and
The Links between Preschool Programs and School Completion Comments on Hauser-Cram 1, McDonald Connor and Morrison 2, and Ou and Reynolds Topic School completion KATHRYN R. WENTZEL, PhD University of Maryland,
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist Effective school psychologists are vital members of the education
Child Care and Its Impact on Young Children s Development Topic Child care (0-5 years) ELLEN S. PEISNER-FEINBERG, PhD FPG Child Development Institute University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA (Published
Policy for Local School Systems To establish early childhood education and parent involvement programs of high quality, the State Board of Education adopts the following policy: 1. Subject to the rules,
Topic School transition School Transition and School Readiness: An Outcome of Early Childhood Development SARA RIMM-KAUFMAN, PhD University of Virginia, USA (Published online February 25, 2004) Introduction
Delray Beach CSAP - Kindergarten Readiness Assurance #1 School Readiness has improved over the past four (4) years and stands at 78% in 2011 with 75% of our students attending a State Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten
Preschool Education and Its Lasting Effects: Research and Policy Implications W. Steven Barnett, Ph.D. National Institute for Early Education Research Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey September
Strategies for Improving the Early Education and Care Workforce in Massachusetts EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SPRING 2010 Executive Summary There is strong evidence and widespread consensus that high-quality early
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Early Childhood Education
Do Early Childhood Intervention Programs Really Work? By Jonathan Crane and Mallory Barg Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy April 2003 1 Executive Summary When early intervention programs were originally
An evidence-based home visiting model All children will learn, grow and develop to realize their full potential. Recognitions Listed as an approved home visiting model meeting the evidence-based criteria
Effects of Child Poverty HIGHLIGHTS On a variety of health indicators, both children and parents in poverty fare worse than those at higher income levels. Young children are especially vulnerable to the
Intervening Early in Arizona BUILD Arizona Initiative by Charles Bruner May 2013 BUILD Arizona is a coalition of children s champions who are working together to enhance opportunities for all young children
Guide to Planning and Assessing School-based Special Education Services GUIDE TO PLANNING AND ASSESSING SCHOOL-BASED SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES 1 T his guide is designed to help school improvement teams
PARENTING SKILLS The Role of Parents in Children s School Transition* Philip A. Cowan, PhD, Carolyn Pape Cowan, PhD University of California, Berkeley, USA December 2014,, 2 nd ed. Introduction The prevailing
Parent Engagement in Early Childhood Education Christopher Henrich, Ph.D. Department of Psychology What is Parent Engagement? Participation in school activities (e.g., volunteering, attending events, going
Kathryn Baron Contributing writer, Education Week Follow Kathryn on Twitter: @TchersPet Partners in Time: Building School-Community Models Expert Presenters: Martin J. Blank, president, Institute for Educational
Issue Brief Project Partnership Name for America s Economic Success Investments in Pennsylvania s early childhood programs pay off now and later American children are struggling to achieve. The majority
Does Student Success Skills have an impact on school connectedness and selfregulation of inner-city, African-American elementary students? Lemberger, M. E., & Clemens, E. V. (2012). Connectedness and self-regulation
POSITIONS AND POLICIES ON EDUCATION Early Childhood Education/Preschool FILE CODE 6178 Full-Day Kindergarten A. The NJSBA believes that full-day kindergarten programs benefit students. Technical assistance
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Long-term Effects of an Early Childhood on Educational Achievement and Juvenile Arrest A 15-Year Follow-up of Low-Income Children in Public Schools Arthur J. Reynolds, PhD Judy A.
SEA Webinar Series: Early ENGAGING ENGLISH LEARNER FAMILIES IN CHARTER SCHOOLS Childhood Learning in Charter Schools www.safalpartners.com About the National Charter School Resource Center Funded through
ready for kindergarten Setting the stage for the future Kindergarten readiness demonstrating the foundational knowledge, skills and behaviors that enable a child to fully participate and succeed in school
REVIEW OF SEEDS OF ACHIEVEMENT Reviewed By W. Steven Barnett and Cynthia E. Lamy National Institute for Early Education Research September 2014 Summary of Review This report argues that a particular charter
2015 Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act Grants Project Abstracts from the U.S. Department of Education Statewide Grants (8) The Arizona Department of Education, $410,202. The overarching
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist Effective school psychologists are vital members of the education
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES Effective Educational Programs for Young Children: What We Need to Know Ruby Takanishi and Kimber L. Bogard Foundation for Child Development ABSTRACT Policymakers and researchers
The Persistence of Head Start Program Effects: What Role Does Subsequent Schooling Play? Katherine Magnuson & Hilary Shager UW-Madison Outline Evidence & conceptual question about HS persistence effects
TAKING MENTAL HEALTH TO SCHOOL: A POLICY- ORIENTED PAPER ON SCHOOL-BASED MENTAL HEALTH FOR ONTARIO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR POLICY MAKERS Taking mental health to school: A policy-oriented paper on school-based
The Transition to Kindergarten: A Review of Current Research and Promising Practices to Involve Families Marielle Bohan-Baker and Priscilla M. D. Little Harvard Family Research Project For questions or
A Look at Maryland s Early Childhood Data System 2 State policymakers and administrators use Maryland s early childhood data system, the Maryland Model for School Readiness (MMSR), to evaluate and promote
Generation Next Leadership Council SPECIAL SESSION AGENDA June 11, 2014 9:00 9:45am Minneapolis Public Schools 1250 W. Broadway, Minneapolis Assembly Room S1-404, 1st Floor 9:00 AM Introduction R.T. Rybak
Introduction Early childhood education has emerged as a priority for state and national policymakers, even in the face of declining education budgets elsewhere. For example, 30 states increased funding
Summary of Arkansas Strategic Plan for Early Childhood Mental Health Arkansas Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems Social-Emotional Workgroup 2014-2015 Early Childhood Mental Health Early childhood professionals
Great Public Schools for Every Student An NEA Policy Brief Wraparound Services Teachers and support professionals know that students need to come to school ready and able to learn. Students who have good
A Look at Maryland s Early Childhood Data System 2 State policymakers and administrators use the Maryland Model for School Readiness (MMSR) the main component of the state s early childhood data system
CALIFORNIA S NEW EDUCATION FUNDING FORMULA: What is it? Who benefits? What does it mean for students? How can I get involved? In July 2013, California dramatically reformed the way we fund our schools.
Research Base of Targeted Early Childhood Education Craig T. Ramey, Ph.D. The Economics of Early Childhood: Smart Beginnings for Virginia s Workforce Pipeline Richmond, VA October 14, 2014 Contact: CTRAMEY@VT.EDU
Holly Miller, Department of Education and Early Learning Department Overview (206) 233-5118 http://www.seattle.gov/education In November 2011, Seattle voters approved a $231 million renewal of the Education-Support
MDR s Guide to Federally Funded Education Programs Major federal programs in the Education Budget for Fiscal Year 2011 are listed below. Twenty-three programs were eliminated from the FY2011 budget, including
STATE AFTERSCHOOL PROFILES NATIONAL PROFILE This national profile provides a picture of afterschool programs across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It includes information about promising state
Early Childhood Care and Education: Effects on Ethnic and Racial Gaps in School Readiness Katherine A. Magnuson and Jane Waldfogel Summary The authors examine black, white, and Hispanic children s differing
Disparities in Early Learning and Development: Lessons from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tamara Halle, Nicole Forry, Elizabeth Hair, Kate Perper, Laura
Lessons Learned: A Review of Early Childhood Development Studies April 2006 Jean Burr, Ph.D. Faculty Fellow Department of Psychology Colby College Rob Grunewald Associate Economist Federal Reserve Bank
HIGHLIGHTS: Top Tier Evidence Initiative: Evidence Summary for First-Grade Classroom Prevention Program (Good Behavior Game plus Enhanced Academic Curriculum) Intervention: A first-grade program that combines
HEAD START: STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES FOR CHILDREN LIVING IN POVERTY Craig T. Ramey and Sharon Landesman Ramey Head Start has inspired early childhood programs for forty-five years, yet evidence reveals
Racing To The Top: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Issues Brief Series #1: Public Charter Schools And High-Quality Pre-K June 17, 2009 Dear Education Reformer: This is the first in a series of issue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Maryland stands ready to make the maximum use of Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC) funding to ensure that Maryland s young children are supported to overcome
Michigan Education Association Proposal for Education Reform Governor Rick Snyder announced his intention to reform education and education finance in Michigan by establishing the Michigan Education Finance
The Economics of Early Childhood Programs: Lasting Benefits and Large Returns Loyola University, Chicago March 15, 2013 Milagros Nores, PhD Steve Barnett, PhD NIEER.ORG Potential Gains from ECEC Investments
Invest Early Early Childhood Initiative Year 8 evaluation summary Introduction Wilder Research, in conjunction with the Invest Early leadership team and staff, is conducting a longitudinal evaluation of
PRIME Planning Realistic Implementation and Maintenance by Educators How to Select an Evidence-Based Intervention A Guide Development of this guide was supported by a grant provided by the Institute of
Research Brief: Multi-tier System of Supports (MTSS) By: Orla Higgins Averill and Claudia Rinaldi, Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative Introduction: From RTI and PBIS to MTSS Most educators
Testimony of Danielle Ewen Director, Child Care and Early Education Center for Law and Social Policy Washington, DC Before the Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services,
Outcomes Data School Psychology EdS Program Programs goals and their associated objectives of the program were designed to be consistent with our philosophy and the 2010 approved National Association of
Abbott Preschool Program Longitudinal Effects Study: Fifth Grade Follow-Up W. Steven Barnett, Ph.D. Kwanghee Jung, Ph.D. Min-Jong Youn, Ph.D. Ellen C. Frede, Ph.D. (Acelero, Inc.) March 20, 2013 National