Evidence-based Coaching as an Applied Positive Psychology?

Transcription

1 Evidence-based Coaching as an Applied Positive Psychology? Anthony Grant PhD Director, Coaching Psychology Unit School of Psychology, University of Sydney

2 Overview Evidence-based coaching Outcome studies from Uni. Sydney 20+ studies on coaching overall Outcome studies to coaching industry profiles Relevance of findings for practice Coaching and Positive Psychology

3 Hi there, I m m a LIFE COACH! BS BS BS Try my one-sizefits-all seven steps to your ideal life! $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ BS BS BS Free trial session!

4

5 Other ways to understand coaching When I was a graduate student about 50 years ago, I thought of opening a storefront office in the South Side of Chicago where I would advise people who walked in about how to get the most out of their lives. That dream has now been realized by the sudden growth of the coaching movement, especially its evidence-based branch. I do think that empirically-grounded coaching can be very helpful. The dangers lie, as in all endeavors of this kind, in promising too much, in extending beyond the knowledge base, and in becoming rigid and territorial. (Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, 2007)

6 Evidence-based Coaching is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in delivering coaching to clients, and in designing and teaching coach training programs (Grant & Stober, 2007) Evidence-based decision making Critical thinking & Optimistic cynicism! NOT Optimistic optimism

7 Coaching is about Self-regulation Set a Goal Develop an Action Plan Act Change (if necessary) Monitor (requires Self-Reflection) Evaluate (associated with Insight) Success

8 Coaching is about the Normal population

9 Positive Psychology & Well-being High Levels of Mental Health Research & Change Low Levels of Mental Health

10 Coaching is essentially about goals Research & Change High Levels of Goal Striving Low Levels of Goal Striving

11 Can evidence based coaching be a platform for an applied positive psychology? Case Conceptualisation PRESENTING ISSUE Solutions Positive Psychology Principles

12 Coaching as Applied Positive Psychology? Study 1: Solution-focused, coaching group program Q: Does Coaching work, and does it impact on self-reflection and insight? Within subjects; N = 20 (Adults 35.6yrs) 13 wks, 50 min weekly, group-based GROW sessions DVs: Self-Reflection & Insight Scale; Quality of Life; Mental Health; Goal Attainment (Grant, 2003)

13 Coaching as Applied Positive Psychology? Study 1: Solution-focused, coaching group program Q: Does Coaching work, and does it impact on self-reflection and insight? Within subjects; N = 20 (Adults 35.6yrs) 13 wks, 50 min weekly, group-based GROW sessions DVs: Self-Reflection & Insight Scale; Quality of Life; Mental Health; Goal Attainment (Grant, 2003)

14 Mental Health & Quality of Life Pre Post p DEP <.01 ANX STRESS <.01 Qual. Life <.01 Increased Goal Attainment (20% pre to 68.01% post: p =<.01)

15 Self-Reflection & Insight Pre Post p Self-Ref <.01 Insight Self-Reflection Insight Pre Post

16 Correlational Relationships Goal Attainment Self-Reflection Insight r = -.36 (p =.01) r =.28 (p =.04) As participants moved through self-regulation cycle towards goals, they became less self-reflective & had greater insight

17 Key Points of Study 1 Self-reflection per se may not facilitate goal attainment

18 Key Points of Study 1 Self-reflection per se may not facilitate goal attainment It s HOW we pay attention that counts

19 Key Points of Study 1 Self-reflection per se may not facilitate goal attainment It s HOW we pay attention that counts Coaching should be solution-focused & generate insights & goal-oriented actions, rather than self-focused reflection

20 Coaching as Applied Positive Psychology Study 2: Solution-focused, Cognitivebehavioural coaching individual program Q: Can we extended Study 1 when screening/excluding participants for mental health issues? Randomised controlled study; N= 67 (Adults 38.5yrs) Screened for mental health problems 22 excluded (25%) Intro. evening, 10 wks 45 min weekly individual coaching DVs: Goal Attainment; Psychological Well-being, Mental Health, Subjective Well-being; Emotional Intelligence (Spence & Grant, 2005)

21 Outcomes Overview pre Coaching post pre Control post p Goal <.001 Life Satisfaction <.05 EI - empc <.05 PWB em <.001 EI empc = Emotional Intelligence facet of Emotional Perception; PWB em = Psychological Well-being: Environmental Mastery Other outcomes measures were not significant

22 Key Points from Study 2 Individual coaching can be effective Goal attainment Life satisfaction Emotional perception Environmental mastery But - Coaching not an infallible panacea Mental Health screening may reduce chance of significant outcome on well-being measures Related problems with measuring wellness in non-clinical populations floor & ceiling effects?

23 Coaching as Applied Positive Psychology Study 3: Solution-focused, Cognitive-behavioural coaching group program Q: Do the effects of coaching maintain over time? Matched group, controlled study; N= 56 (Adults 42.7yrs) Screened, but lower exclusion threshold than Study 2 1 day workshop, 10 wks, 1 hr weekly, group-based Follow-up at 10 weeks, 20 weeks and 30 weeks post (Green, Oades & Grant, 2006)

24 Outcomes Overview T1 T2 pre Coaching post pre Control post p Goal <.001 Life Satisfaction <.05 PANAS + ve <.001 PANAS - ve <.015 Hope <.001 Gains maintained at 30 week follow-up

25 Key Points of Study 3 Coaching can enhance goal attainment, hope, subjective & psychological wellbeing Gains can be maintained over 30 weeks

26 Key Points of Study 3 Coaching can enhance goal attainment, hope, subjective & psychological wellbeing Gains can be maintained over 30 weeks Positive psychological benefits even though focus of program was on goal attainment

27 Coaching as Applied Positive Psychology Study 4: Mindfulness and Coaching Q: Does Mindfulness training effect outcomes? Cross-over placebo design; N= 45 (Adults 35.5yrs) Screened, 31.5% had health problems (DASS) All participants set goals using Goal Attainment Scaling 1. MT-C = Mindfulness Training then Coaching Audio MP3 attentional training and meditation 15-30mins 2. C-MT = Coaching then Mindfulness Training 2 face to face, 2 phone 45 min sessions 3. GHE = General Health Education (placebo group) 4 Fortnightly seminars (45 mins), alternate weeks 5-10 min phone calls (Spence, Cavanagh & Grant, 2006)

28 Study 4 Design Group 1 MT-C Phase 1 4 weeks Mindful training Phase 2 4 weeks Coaching Group 2 C-MT Coaching Mindful training Group 3 GHE Fortnightly health seminars plus phone call support

29 Study 4 Goal Outcomes Outcome "At or Above" Target Level % of Total Goals Set Phase 1 Phase 2 88 MT-C C-MT GHE

30 % of Total Goals Set Study 4 Goal Outcomes Outcome "Below" Target Level Phase 1 Phase 2 MT-C C-MT GHE

31 Key Points of Study 4 Mindfulness training before coaching seems to build psychological muscle Baumeister vs. Attentional Focus?

32 Key Points of Study 4 Mindfulness training before coaching seems to build psychological muscle Baumeister vs. Attentional Focus? Short MT can be effective MT in coaching reduces anxiety & stress

33 Key Points of Study 4 Mindfulness training before coaching seems to build psychological muscle Baumeister vs. Attentional Focus? Short MT can be effective MT in coaching reduces anxiety & stress Coaching adds value - Information alone is not enough

34 Key Points The main focus of these coaching studies was goal attainment - participants were coached to reach their goals Well-being & other positive psychological benefits were ancillary outcomes Although coaching can be very effective it s no panacea Coaching is an applied positive psychology

35 Other CPU coaching outcome studies Peer vs professional coaches (RCT) Professional coaches more effective than peer (Spence & Grant, 2007) High school students (RTC) Life coaching enhanced resilience and hope (Green, Grant, Rynsaardt. 2007) High school teachers (RTC) Workplace coaching enhanced well-being, goal attainment and hope (Grant, Green, Rynsaardt, 2007) Coaching vs training (skills and EI) (pre-post) Coaching increased both skills and EI, training increased only skills (Grant, 2007)

36 How can we put positive psychology together with coaching? High Levels of Mental Health High Levels of Goal Striving

37 Model of Goal Striving and Mental Health Low Mental Health

38 Future directions Develop case conceptualization processes Can coaching help people develop truly sustainable states of flourishing? Does coaching for well-being enhance specific goal attainment? Can we have our cake and eat it too?

39 Evidence-based Coaching as an Applied Positive Psychology? Absolutely! Anthony Grant PhD Director, Coaching Psychology Unit School of Psychology, University of Sydney Please feel free to contact me