Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a"

Transcription

1 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION Case Number XXX A.C.G., J.G.M., on behalf of themselves and ) all others similarly situated, ) Plaintiffs ) ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT ) E.G.O. d/b/a Company X, E.R.O., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) I. INTRODUCTION 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a fee. They operate under a sole proprietorship owned by Defendant E.G.O. which is called Company X ( Company X ). Defendant Eiblys G. E.G.O. also has a regular radio program on which he gives immigration advice to callers and advises them to use Company X s immigration services. Neither Defendant E.G.O. nor Defendant E.R.O. is an attorney in the United States nor is either of them accredited by the Board of Immigration Appeals to provide immigration services or legal advice to clients. 2. Plaintiffs are customers of Defendants who seek to bring class claims for declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief for violations of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act., N.C.G.S , and negligence per se, based on Defendants provision of legal advice and services for a fee. 1

2 II. VENUE AND JURISDICTION 1. Venue is proper in Durham County pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 1-82, because Plaintiff A.C.G. resides in Durham County, and Defendants maintain a place of business in Durham County. III. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff A.C.G. ( A.C.G. ) is a U.S. citizen and a resident of Durham County, North Carolina. She is married to R.G., a citizen of Mexico. Plaintiff A.C.G. is a former customer of Defendants. Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband used Defendants immigration services between 2004 and Plaintiff J.G.M. ( J.G.M. ) is a citizen of Mexico and a resident of Wilson County, North Carolina. He is a former customer of Defendants. Plaintiff J.G.M. used Defendants immigration services between 2003 and Defendant E.G.O. resides in Wake County. He owns a sole proprietorship providing immigration services under the assumed name Company X, with offices in Wake County, North Carolina and Durham County, North Carolina. He also previously had an office providing immigration services, also with the name Company X, in Wilson County, North Carolina. 6. Defendant E.R.O. resides in Wake County. She is the wife of Defendant E.G.O.. She works in the offices of Company X providing immigration services. IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS A. Factual Allegations Pertaining to All Plaintiffs and Members of the Plaintiff Class 2

3 7. Defendant E.G.O. is not an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of North Carolina. 8. Upon information and belief, Defendant E.G.O. is not an attorney licensed to practice law in any jurisdiction in the United States. 9. Defendant E.G.O. is not accredited by the Board of Immigration Appeals to provide immigration assistance. 10. Defendant E.R.O. is not an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of North Carolina. 11. Upon information and belief, Defendant E.R.O. is not an attorney licensed to practice law in any jurisdiction in the United States. 12. Defendant E.R.O. is not accredited by the Board of Immigration Appeals to provide immigration assistance. 13. Upon information and belief, Defendant E.G.O. s sole proprietorship, Company X employs no licensed attorneys to provide immigration services. 14. Defendant E.G.O. is currently licensed as a notary public in the state of North Carolina. 15. Defendant E.R.O. was licensed as a notary public in the state of North Carolina during all times relevant to this law suit, until December The duties of a notary public in North Carolina to the public are outlined in N.C.G.S. 10B-20 (i) through (n). According to N.C.G.S. 10B-20 (i) through (n), notaries in North Carolina are prohibited from representing or advertising that the notary public is an immigration consultant or expert on immigration matters and are prohibited from rendering any service that constitutes the unauthorized practice of law and shall not claim to have 3

4 powers, qualifications, rights, or privileges that the office of notary does not provide, including the power to counsel on immigration matters. Notaries are also required to post signs and include information in all advertisements explaining that they are not attorneys and that they may not give legal advice. 17. Defendants are further barred from practicing law in the state of North Carolina by N.C.G.S According to N.C.G.S. 84-4, persons who are not members of the North Carolina State Bar are may not by word, sign, letter, or advertisement, hold out himself, or themselves, as competent or qualified to give legal advice or counsel, or to prepare legal documents, or as being engaged in advising or counseling in law or acting as attorney or counselor-at-law, or in furnishing the services of a lawyer or lawyers; and it shall be unlawful for any person or association of persons except active members of the Bar, for or without a fee or consideration, to give legal advice or counsel, perform for or furnish to another legal services or to prepare for another person, firm or corporation, any other legal document. 18. Under the North Carolina statutes, practicing law is defined in N.C.G.S as: performing any legal service for any other person, firm or corporation, with or without compensation, specifically including the preparation and filing of petitions for use in any court, including administrative tribunals and other judicial or quasi-judicial bodies, or assisting by advice, counsel, or otherwise in any legal work; and to advise or give opinion upon the legal rights of any person, firm or corporation. 19. At all times relevant to this complaint, Defendants were doing business providing immigration law services to paying customers, including filling out immigration paperwork to submit to Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Department of State. 4

5 20. Upon information and belief, during time periods relevant to this complaint, Defendants advertised their services using the business name Company X on the Spanishlanguage radio station WETC 540 AM, broadcast from Wake County, North Carolina. 21. Defendants radio commercial states that Company X provides immigration services at a low cost, including assisting customers to apply for legal permanent residency and citizenship. 22. Defendants radio commercial does not state that no one who works at Company X is an attorney, nor does it state that no one who works at Company X is accredited by the Board of Immigration Appeals to provide immigration services. 23. For some or all of the time relevant to this case, Defendant E.G.O. has conducted a weekly radio program on radio station WETC 540 AM in which he dispenses advice on immigration law to callers. On the radio program, Defendant E.G.O. also tells callers to visit the Company X offices to receive further assistance in their immigration cases. 24. On his radio program, callers frequently refer to Defendant E.G.O. as abogado, which is Spanish for lawyer. 25. Defendant E.G.O. has repeatedly failed to correct callers when they call him abogado or explain to listeners that he is not a lawyer. 26. Upon information and belief, Defendants have also advertised their services as notarios or notaries public. 27. In Mexico, a notario público is a lawyer with credentials beyond that of most Mexican lawyers. 28. At their storefront offices, Defendants dispensed advice on immigration law to customers. 5

6 29. Defendants also helped customers prepare immigration applications to be sent to Citizenship and Immigration Services, and the Department of State. Those departments then adjudicated the applications and made decisions on the applicants eligibility for visas and other immigration benefits. 30. Defendants charged customers a fee for the immigration advice and services they provided. 31. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O. had an agreement, express or implied, pursuant to which they both engaged in the actions that are alleged in this complaint, and as a consequence of which both Defendants actions alleged in this complaint were done in furtherance of a conspiracy between them. 32. While Defendant E.G.O. was the owner of Company X, Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O. had an express or implied agreement that they would both work in the Company X office providing immigration services. 33. Both Defendants had notice and knowledge that the other Defendant was providing immigration advice, filling out immigration paperwork, and otherwise engaging in the work of running Company X. 34. Upon information and belief, both Defendants had notice and knowledge that the other Defendant was not qualified or licensed to provide such immigration advice and assistance. 35. Defendants agreed to perform the unlawful activities described in this Complaint pursuant to a common scheme to earn money for Defendant E.G.O. s sole proprietorship, Company X. 6

7 36. As a consequence of such conspiracy, Defendant E.R.O. is jointly and severally liable for all unfair and deceptive practices committed by Defendant E.G.O. in connection with providing immigration advice or services without qualification to do so. 37. Conversely, Defendant E.G.O. is jointly and severally liable for all unfair and deceptive practices by Defendant E.R.O. in connection with providing immigration advice or services without qualification to do so. B. Factual Allegations Pertaining to Plaintiff A.C.G. 38. Paragraphs 7 through 37 are realleged and incorporated by reference herein. 39. Plaintiff A.C.G. ( A.C.G. ) is a U.S. citizen and long-time resident of North Carolina. In 2003, she married R.G., a citizen of Mexico. 40. Plaintiff A.C.G. s husband had heard Defendant E.G.O. s program on the radio and suggested that they go to his office for immigration assistance. 41. In or around December 2004, Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband first visited Defendants office in Raleigh. 42. During one of Plaintiff A.C.G. s first consultations with Defendant E.G.O., Defendant E.G.O. orally advised and represented to Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband that R.G. could acquire valid legal immigration status because he was married to a U.S. citizen. 43. Defendant E.G.O. also advised Plaintiff A.C.G. that her husband had a good case without problems. 44. During the time that he provided legal services to Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband, Defendant E.G.O. orally represented that he was qualified to give immigration assistance and that he knew immigration law. 7

8 45. Also during the time that he provided legal services to Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband, Defendant E.G.O. orally represented that he had been to law school. 46. Between 2004 and 2008, Defendants provided a number of immigration law services to Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband. 47. Defendant E.G.O. selected legal forms for Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband, filled in the blanks of those legal forms, applied law to the facts of Plaintiff A.C.G. s case, and gave legal advice to Plaintiff A.C.G Defendants charged fees to Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband for each immigration law service that they provided. 49. Between 2004 and 2008, Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband paid at least $1, in fees to Defendants for immigration services. 50. In addition to these fees, Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband paid fees to Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Department of State for submitting their immigration applications. 51. While Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband were customers of Defendants, Defendants gave incorrect or incomplete legal advice to Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband. 52. Defendants failed to advise Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband of the risks that they incurred by relying on the incorrect or incomplete legal advice. 53. Defendants generally failed to advise Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband that there might be any risk in R.G. s applying for an immigrant benefits. 54. Defendants did not advise Plaintiff A.C.G. or her husband about potential legal remedies for which he may have qualified, or of potential legal arguments he could have made in his case. 8

9 55. As a result, Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband have been damaged. 56. Plaintiff A.C.G. and her husband have had to hire an immigration attorney to attempt to fix problems in R.G. s immigration case. C. Factual Allegations Pertaining to Plaintiff José J.G.M. 57. Paragraphs 7 through 37 are realleged and reincorporated by reference herein. 58. Plaintiff J.G.M. ( J.G.M. ) is a citizen of Mexico and a resident of North Carolina. 59. Plaintiff J.G.M. first visited Defendants office in Wilson, North Carolina sometime in Plaintiff J.G.M. and his father visited Defendants office to seek advice on applying for a V visa. 61. At one of Plaintiff J.G.M. s first consultations, Defendant E.R.O. orally advised and represented to Plaintiff J.G.M. and his father that that Plaintiff J.G.M. could acquire a V visa and work permit. 62. Between 2003 an 2008, Defendants provided several immigration services for Plaintiff J.G.M Defendants E.R.O. and E.G.O. selected legal forms for Plaintiff J.G.M., filled in the blanks of those legal forms, applied law to the facts of Plaintiff J.G.M. s case, and gave legal advice to Plaintiff J.G.M During the time that they provided legal services to Plaintiff J.G.M., Defendants orally represented that they were qualified to give immigration assistance and that they knew immigration law. 9

10 65. Defendants charged fees to Plaintiff J.G.M. for each immigration service that they provided. 66. In addition to the fees paid to Defendants, Plaintiff J.G.M. paid fees to Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Department of State for submitting his immigration applications. 67. On at least two occasions while Plaintiff J.G.M. was a customer of Defendants, Defendants gave incorrect or incomplete legal advice to Plaintiff J.G.M Defendants failed to advise Plaintiff J.G.M. of the risks he incurred by relying on their incorrect or incomplete legal advice. 69. Defendants generally failed to advise Plaintiff J.G.M. that there might be any risk in his applying for an immigrant benefits. 70. As a result, Plaintiff J.G.M. has been damaged. 71. Plaintiff J.G.M. has had to hire an immigration attorney to attempt to fix problems in his immigration case. V. CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS 72. Plaintiffs seek to pursue claims for declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief in accordance with Rule 23(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure as representatives of a class defined as follows: all persons to whom Defendants provided legal assistance on an immigration matter, for compensation or Defendants expectation of compensation, within four years prior to the date of the filing of this complaint and continuing until the date judgment is entered in this action. 73. The preceding paragraphs are realleged and reincorporated by reference herein. 10

11 74. Because of Defendants actions alleged above, Plaintiffs and members of the Plaintiff Class have been damaged in their property. 75. The class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. Upon information and belief, the class of persons to whom Defendants has provided immigration assistance during the last four years is in the hundreds or thousands. 76. Common issues of law predominate over individual issues. The questions of whether Defendants conduct has violated the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act and whether it constitutes negligence per se are common to members of the class. 77. Plaintiffs legal claims concerning Defendants illegal conduct are typical of the claims of the class in that Plaintiffs A.C.G. and J.G.M. have received immigration assistance from Defendants, and have paid Defendants for that assistance. 78. Defendants actions and omissions are generally applicable to the class, making declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief appropriate with respect to the class as a whole. 79. The named Plaintiffs are adequate representatives of the class in that they do not have antagonistic or conflicting claims with other members of the class, and the named Plaintiffs have a sufficient interest in the outcome to ensure vigorous advocacy. 80. Plaintiffs are represented by experienced counsel who will vigorously prosecute the litigation on behalf of the class. The undersigned counsel are experienced litigators. Carlene McNulty is an experienced class action litigator and has experience bringing claims alleging unlawful business practices. Katharine Woomer-Deters has experience litigating federal and state cases on behalf of multiple Plaintiffs including cases involving immigrant clients. Daniel Rearick has experience representing clients in complex federal litigation. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Plaintiff Class) 11

12 (Violation of G.S ) 81. The allegations of the preceding paragraphs are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 82. All Plaintiffs and members of the Plaintiff Class bring this claim against Defendants E.G.O. d/b/a Company X and Defendant E.R.O. 83. The conduct of Defendants alleged herein constitutes unfair and deceptive acts or practices in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat Such actions are against the established public policy of the State of North Carolina; are in or affecting commerce in North Carolina; are unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, and substantially injurious to the consumers of North Carolina; and have the capacity and tendency to deceive the average consumer. 85. The matters alleged were done willfully. 86. Plaintiffs suffered actual injury as a result of Defendants unfair actions. Such injury consists of the money that Plaintiffs paid to Defendants for immigration law services. 87. The named Plaintiffs and the members of the Plaintiff Class are entitled to recover, and request, damages in the amount of three times their actual injury. 88. Plaintiff and the members of the Plaintiff Class and their counsel are further entitled to recover, and request, an award of attorney fees pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat Plaintiffs are also entitled to seek, and do seek, injunctive relief. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that Defendants unlawful, unfair and fraudulent business practices described above present a continuing threat to members of the class and to members of the public in that Defendants continue to engage in these practices. Such practices 12

13 will cause great and irreparable injury to class members and to the general public in that they will suffer injury similar to that of Plaintiffs, including but not limited to: paying money to Defendants for services that Defendants provide without qualification to do so. Defendants customers will thereby be damaged in their property. 90. Injunctive relief is proper because Plaintiffs, the class members, and the general public have no adequate remedy at law. Damages alone cannot compel the Defendants to cease to engage in the unfair business practices described in this action. Plaintiffs allege that the benefit to the public good, as well as to Plaintiff Class, far outweighs the inconvenience to the Defendants of ceasing to engage in violations of North Carolina s unfair and deceptive practices act, N.C.G.S SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Plaintiff Class) (Negligence Per Se) 91. The allegations of the preceding paragraphs are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 92. This claim is made by all Plaintiffs and members of the Plaintiff Class against Defendants E.G.O. d/b/a Company X and E.R.O Defendants owed a duty of care to Plaintiffs as notaries public in North Carolina, based on the provisions of N.C.G.S. 10B-20 (i) through (n). 13

14 94. As non-members of the North Carolina State Bar, Defendants also have a duty of care to not practice law in the State of North Carolina, based on the provisions of N.C.G.S Defendants breached their duty of care by providing assistance on immigration matters to Plaintiffs, including actions which constitute the unauthorized practice of law. 96. N.C.G.S and N.C.G.S. 10B-20 (i) through (n) were adopted to protect the public safety or welfare. 97. Plaintiffs are within the class of entities or individuals that N.C.G.S and N.C.G.S. 10B-20 (i) through (n) were adopted to protect. 98. Defendants could have reasonably foreseen that by providing assistance on immigration matters, including actions that constitute the unauthorized practice of law, they would cause damage to Plaintiffs. 99. Plaintiffs have in fact suffered injury as a result of Defendants breaches of duty. Such injury consists of the money that Plaintiffs paid to Defendants for immigration services Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O. are jointly and severably liable for these breaches of duty for the reasons alleged in this Complaint. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of the class, pray: 1. That this case be allowed to proceed as a class action; 2. That Plaintiffs and the Plaintiff Class be awarded monetary, declarative and injunctive relief as hereinabove requested; 3. That the costs of this case and attorney fees for Plaintiffs be taxed against Defendants; and 14

15 4. That the Court award such other relief as it deems just and proper. This the day of, For the North Carolina Justice Center: Katharine Woomer-Deters North Carolina Bar #33892 Daniel Rearick North Carolina Bar # Carlene McNulty North Carolina Bar # P.O. Box Raleigh, North Carolina (919) (919) (fax) 15

16 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-000-jah -CAB Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. (SBN: ) josh@westcoastlitigation.com Robert L. Hyde, Esq. (SBN: ) bob@westcoastlitigation.com Hyde & Swigart Camino Del Rio South,

More information

Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GARY HANLEY on behalf of himself and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) ron@consumersadvocates.com ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) alexis@consumersadvocates.com KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) kas@consumersadvocates.com

More information

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND District Court, Denver County, Colorado 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 GUILLERMO ARTEAGA-GOMEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE FILED: January 22, 2015 6:02

More information

1 2 3 4 5 [ATTORNEY NAME] (ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER) [ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM STREET ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE] [LAW FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER] [LAW FIRM FAX NUMBER]

More information

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Case No.: v. Plaintiff, BASS PRELITIGATION

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. Attorney General, and Audrey L. Udashen, Assistant Attorney General, brings this action

STATE OF WASHINGTON SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. Attorney General, and Audrey L. Udashen, Assistant Attorney General, brings this action 1 1 1 1 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON, V. STATE OF WASHINGTON SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff, MICHAEL'S OFFICE LLC; MYKHAYLO BENDZAR a/k/a MICHAEL BENDZAR, in his individual capacity and d/b/a MICHAEL'S

More information

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. KIM WALLANT and LOUIS BOREK, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, FREEDOM

More information

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KELVIN BLEDSOE, Plaintiff, v. SAAQIN, INC., No. COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff Kelvin

More information

Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8

Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8 Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 9:13-cv-80670-KAM AJA DE LOS SANTOS, an individual, on

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff State of North Carolina, by and through its Attorney General, brings this action

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff State of North Carolina, by and through its Attorney General, brings this action 13CVUI4147 NORTH CAROLINA WAKE COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION File No. ---------------- STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex ref. ROY COOPER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION JAMES C. STURDEVANT (SBN 94551 JESPER I. RASMUSSEN (SBN 121001 THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 475 Sansome Street, Suite 1750 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415 477-2410

More information

Case 3:13-cv-01686-JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:13-cv-01686-JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10 Case 313-cv-01686-JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Renee Wheeler, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION WAYNE WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PROTECT SECURITY, LLC. Defendant.

More information

Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9

Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9 Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:13-cv-61747-RSR KURT S. SOTO, an individual, on behalf

More information

Case 2:14-cv-00244 Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:14-cv-00244 Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE DR. A. CEMAL EKIN, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, v. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Case 1:15-cv-00224-TDS-LPA Document 1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA JAMES J. MAZUR, DPM, and ) JAMES MAZUR, D.P.M., P.A., on behalf of ) themselves

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, Court File No. 12-cv-01236-RHK-JSM INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, Court File No. 12-cv-01236-RHK-JSM INTRODUCTION CASE 0:12-cv-01236-RHK-JSM Document 50 Filed 04/01/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, ACTION COMPLAINT v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

More information

Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants.

Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants. BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California HERSCHEL T. ELKINS Senior Assistant Attorney General ALBERT NORMAN SHELDEN Supervising Deputy Attorney General HOWARD WAYNE (State Bar No. ) Deputy

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA MICHAEL BARFIELD, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, Case No.: IMMEDIATE HEARING v. REQUESTED PURSUANT TO Fla. Stat. 119.11 (2009) BERNADETTE DIPINO,

More information

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAROL PARKER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PARADE ENTERPRISES, LLC, No. 3:14-CV-08084-MAS-DEA AMENDED COMPLAINT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT CORY GROSHEK, and all others, similarly situated, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 TIME WARNER CABLE INC. Defendant. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION ELECTRONICALLY FILED 5/18/2012 2:30 PM CV-2012-901583.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA ANNE-MARIE ADAMS, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION ZACHARY

More information

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8 Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Reno, NV ( -00 Fax ( 0-0 0 Mark R. Thierman, NV# laborlawyer@pacbell.net THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Reno, Nevada Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( 0-0 David R. Markham, CAL#

More information

CIVIL DICTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA

CIVIL DICTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA CIVIL DICTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA LESTER ANSARDI, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED SUIT NO. PLAINTIFF VERSUS UNITED STATES MARITIME SERVICES, INC., UNITED

More information

Case 3:08-cv-00920-JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:08-cv-00920-JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 3:08-cv-00920-JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 236 Tillou Road South Orange, NJ 07079 Telephone: (973 313-1887 Fax: (973 833-0399 lrosen@rosenlegal.com

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEAN KUMANCHIK, vs. Plaintiff, Case No.: UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD d/b/a UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, a Florida

More information

Case 1:15-cv-13004-GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv-13004-GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:15-cv-13004-GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KEITH MATHEWS On behalf of himself and Others similarly situated Plaintiff, Case

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, and THE OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY

More information

Case5:15-cv-03698-HRL Document1 Filed08/12/15 Page1 of 10

Case5:15-cv-03698-HRL Document1 Filed08/12/15 Page1 of 10 Case:-cv-0-HRL Document Filed0// Page of 0 Donald E. J. Kilmer, Jr. [SBN: ] LAW OFFICES OF DONALD KILMER Willow Street, Suite 0 San Jose, California Voice: (0) - Fax: (0) - E-Mail: Don@DKLawOffice.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION Case 4:14-cv-00397-RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION JOSEPH REILLY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION DE ANGELO BENTLEY, ) MARQUES ROBERTSON, ) IKEYMA MCKENTRY, ) individually,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Richard Hanley and : Civil Action No. 04- Susan Hanley : v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Richard Hanley and : Civil Action No. 04- Susan Hanley : v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Richard Hanley and : Civil Action No. 04- Susan Hanley : v. Gerald E Moore, Individually : Gerald E. Moore & Associates PC a/k/a Gerald

More information

Case 1:13-cv-11944 Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:13-cv-11944 Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 : : : : : : : : : : : Case 113-cv-11944 Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Robert Pegg, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Collecto,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No. TREVOR A. GRIMM, State Bar No. JONATHAN M. COUPAL, State Bar No. 1 TIMOTHY A. BITTLE, State Bar No. 00 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation 1 Eleventh Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 1 (1-0 Attorneys for

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF RICHMOND, STATE OF GEORGIA. NOW COMES the named plaintiff, for himse_if and all

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF RICHMOND, STATE OF GEORGIA. NOW COMES the named plaintiff, for himse_if and all ! IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF RICHMOND, STATE OF GEORGIA L. WAYNE GRIFFIN, and all other persons similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs AMERICAN DEFENDER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant CIVIL

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE In Re: Chapter 7 Case No. 05-22665 Mikel W. Tuttle, d/b/a MT Construction, DMI Industries, Inc., and MT Construction, Inc., Debtor State of Maine, Adv.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH LAURIE PAUL, individually and on behalf of all other similarly-situated individuals, Plaintiff, vs. PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEMS-

More information

9:10-cv-01756-MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA INTRODUCTION

9:10-cv-01756-MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA INTRODUCTION 9:10-cv-01756-MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON xxxxxxxxxxxdivision BEAUFORT ) Jonathon Rowles, individually

More information

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in Weld County, Colorado, District Court, 901 9 th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970.351.7300 Plaintiff: vs. Defendants: JENNIFER BELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRADLEY PETROLEUM,

More information

Case 1:05-cv-01658-CCB Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/2005 Page 1 of 18

Case 1:05-cv-01658-CCB Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/2005 Page 1 of 18 Case 1:05-cv-01658-CCB Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/2005 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Northern Division SPRINGFIELD FINANCIAL COMPANY, L.L.C., d/b/a SFC, L.L.C.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 Daniel G. Shay, CA Bar #0 danielshay@tcpafdcpa.com LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL G. SHAY 0 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 1B San Diego, California 0 Tel:.. Fax:.1. Benjamin H. Richman* brichman@edelson.com J.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER Case 1:14-cv-05919-JEI-KMW Document 19 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 84 Frank L. Corrado, Esquire Attorney ID No. 022221983 BARRY, CORRADO & GRASSI, PC 2700 Pacific Avenue Wildwood, NJ 08260 (609)

More information

FILED 15 JUL 27 AM 9:22

FILED 15 JUL 27 AM 9:22 FILED JUL AM : KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --- KNT JUDITH JORGENSEN, vs. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY Plaintiff, JAMES WONG and TYRA WONG, husband and wife creating

More information

4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Ryan Michael Stinnett, on behalf of himself CASE

More information

Case: 1:15-cv-00608 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case: 1:15-cv-00608 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1 Case: 1:15-cv-00608 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY

More information

Case 2:10-cv-03242-SSV-DEK Document 27 Filed 12/07/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:10-cv-03242-SSV-DEK Document 27 Filed 12/07/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 2:10-cv-03242-SSV-DEK Document 27 Filed 12/07/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KATHLEEN A. BRANDNER, individually, and CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT on behalf of

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Jack Anderson, Esq. SBN 0 JACK ANDERSON, ESQ., APLC Balboa Avenue, Suite E San Diego, California Tel.: ( - Fax: ( 0- jackandersonaplc@yahoo.com Attorney for Defendant and Cross-Complainant Starline Windows,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION SIMON DOMINGUEZ, PEDRO DOMINGUEZ, JOSE FRANCISCO BRIONES, and ROBERT PEREZ On Behalf of Themselves and All

More information

Case 3:15-cv-00592-LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv-00592-LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-lab-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. Attorney General VANITA GUPTA Acting Assistant Attorney General STEVEN H. ROSENBAUM Chief, Housing and Civil Enforcement Section ELIZABETH

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA H.L. WATKINS AND COMPANY, INC., ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. v. ) ) 06-CV8980-3 THE HOT LEAD COMPANY, LLC, ) ROBERT MICHAEL HORNE, )

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. ) JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, ) Attorney General, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. ACCESS RESOURCE SERVICES, )

More information

Case3:13-cv-02858-JST Document27 Filed11/27/13 Page1 of 14

Case3:13-cv-02858-JST Document27 Filed11/27/13 Page1 of 14 Case:-cv-0-JST Document Filed// Page of 0 Clayeo C. Arnold, California SBN 00 carnold@justiceyou.com Christine M. Doyle, California SBN 0 cdoyle@justiceyou.com CLAYEO C. ARNOLD, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

More information

Case 1:12-cv-01374-RJJ Doc #28 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#165 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:12-cv-01374-RJJ Doc #28 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#165 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Case 1:12-cv-01374-RJJ Doc #28 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#165 CHRISTOPHER FRANKE, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN -vs- Case No. 12-1374 Hon. Robert

More information

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. MARIA GODINEZ, an individual,

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. MARIA GODINEZ, an individual, VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

More information

COURT USE ONLY COMPLAINT

COURT USE ONLY COMPLAINT DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO ex rel. John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. Jennifer Proffitt-Payne,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Harvey C. Berger (SBN POPE & BERGER 0 West "C" Street, Suite 100 San Diego, California 1 Telephone: (1-1 Facsimile: (1 - Attorneys for Plaintiff PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, C. A. NO. VS.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, C. A. NO. VS. Case 4:12-cv-02469 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/17/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA;

More information

Case 2:13-cv-00279-TOR Document 1 Filed 07/30/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:13-cv-00279-TOR Document 1 Filed 07/30/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 JONATHAN E. NUECHTERLEIN General Counsel ROBERT J. SCHROEDER Regional Director NADINE SAMTER, WA Bar # JENNIFER LARABEE, CA Bar # nd Ave., Suite Seattle, WA ( 0- (Samter; ( 0-0 (Larabee Email: nsamter@ftc.gov;

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Complaint. Credit Extension Uniformity Act 73 P.S. 2270, et seq.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Complaint. Credit Extension Uniformity Act 73 P.S. 2270, et seq. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Michael XXXX : Civil Action v. : Enhanced Recovery Corp. : Complaint Jurisdiction & Venue 1. This is an action under the Fair Debt

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 LAKESHORE LAW CENTER Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. (State Bar No. 0 0 Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite 0-0 Yorba Linda, CA --0 --0 (fax jeff@lakeshorelaw.org Attorney and Plaintiff

More information

DISTRICT COURT. EL PASO COUNTY. COLORADO 270 S. Tejon Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOH1. W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

DISTRICT COURT. EL PASO COUNTY. COLORADO 270 S. Tejon Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOH1. W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, DISTRICT COURT. EL PASO COUNTY. COLORADO 270 S. Tejon Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOH1. W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, V. IMMIGRATION CENTER alk/a U.S. IMMIGRATION

More information

Case: 1:14-cv-01637 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/10/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:14-cv-01637 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/10/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case: 1:14-cv-01637 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/10/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JOHNNIE

More information

Case: 1:13-cv-08310 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case: 1:13-cv-08310 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 Case: 1:13-cv-08310 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL GRANT, individually and on

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JPM NETWORKS, LLC, ) d/b/a KWIKBOOST ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 3:14-cv-1507 JCM FIRST VENTURE, LLC )

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) R. Andrew Ketner and Stephen Baker, ) individually and on behalf of all other ) COMPLAINT similarly situated individuals,

More information

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and file a certificate of service with the Court within 10 days. Dated: Jul 26, 2010 Catherine A. Lemon District

More information

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 2. COGA promotes the expansion of oil and gas supplies, markets, and transportation infrastructure.

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 2. COGA promotes the expansion of oil and gas supplies, markets, and transportation infrastructure. DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO 1777 Sixth Street Boulder, CO 80302 Plaintiff: COLORADO OIL & GAS ASSOCIATION v. Defendant: COURT USE ONLY Case No. Division/Courtroom: CITY OF LAFAYETTE, COLORADO

More information

Plaintiffs Steve Yourke and Kristin Richards ( Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves and

Plaintiffs Steve Yourke and Kristin Richards ( Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves and 1 1 Plaintiffs Steve Yourke and Kristin Richards ( Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated United States residents, allege the following: INTRODUCTION 1. This is a civil action

More information

4. Whole Foods Market, Inc. is a Texas Corporation whose principal office in

4. Whole Foods Market, Inc. is a Texas Corporation whose principal office in 4. Whole Foods Market, Inc. is a Texas Corporation whose principal office in this state is 601 North Lamar Blvd, Austin, Texas 78703. It may be served with process by serving CT Corporation System, 1021

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Plaintiff, v. GENWORTH MORTGAGE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. / COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION

More information

Case 5:14-cv-00631 Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv-00631 Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Case 5:14-cv-00631 Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION CAROLE RIELEY Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14 cv 00631

More information

Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BEST LITTLE PROMOHOUSE IN TEXAS LLC, Plaintiffs,

More information

Case 1:13-cv-10524 Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cv-10524 Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:13-cv-10524 Document 1 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Patricia Boudreau, Alex Gray, ) And Bobby Negron ) On Behalf of Themselves and All

More information

Unauthorized Practice of Law

Unauthorized Practice of Law Unauthorized Practice of Law Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia - Laws, Regulations and Procedures for how to file a complaint against a Notario Publico Overview Notary v. Notario Publico

More information

Case 1:12-cv-03270-WJM-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:12-cv-03270-WJM-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:12-cv-03270-WJM-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 Civil Action No. 12-CV-3270 BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - CENTRAL DIVISION. Plaintifl. Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - CENTRAL DIVISION. Plaintifl. Defendants. 1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California CATHERINE Z. YSRAEL Supervising Deputy Attorney General JUDITH FIORENTINI Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 1 West A Street, Suite 10 San Diego,

More information

0004853 O8. RECEIVED Civil Clk' Office. JUN 2 7 2008 Superior Court of th District of Cohmibja

0004853 O8. RECEIVED Civil Clk' Office. JUN 2 7 2008 Superior Court of th District of Cohmibja C C IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION 1111 PENNSYLVANIA HOLDINGS LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company By and Through Its Managing Member 1111 Penn Holdings-i LLC A

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION NANCY PRITCHARD, v. Plaintiff, Case No.: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION; KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION, as PLAN ADMINISTRATOR;

More information

Case No.: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF WORKMANSHIP AND HABITABILITY. Plaintiffs,

Case No.: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF WORKMANSHIP AND HABITABILITY. Plaintiffs, 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Stephen L. Weber, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) Michael J. White, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) James W. Fleming, Esq. (AZ SBN 0) KASDAN SIMONDS WEBER & VAUGHAN LLP 00 N. Central Ave., Suite 0 Phoenix, AZ 0 E-Mail:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CAROL LANNAN and ANN WINN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LEVY & WHITE and ROBERT R. WHITE, ESQ., Case No.

More information

Trademark Infringement Complaint. No. Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys,, I. PARTIES

Trademark Infringement Complaint. No. Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys,, I. PARTIES Trademark Infringement Complaint [Name/Address] Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ALPHA, INC., a Washington corporation, v. Plaintiff, MR, DELTA

More information

2:14-cv-03460-RMG Date Filed 08/27/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

2:14-cv-03460-RMG Date Filed 08/27/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 2:14-cv-03460-RMG Date Filed 08/27/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION DANIEL CHRISTOPHER DRUMMOND AND PAULANN PERRY,

More information

Case 2:11-cv-10174-DML-MJH Document 1 Filed 01/13/11 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv-10174-DML-MJH Document 1 Filed 01/13/11 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:11-cv-10174-DML-MJH Document 1 Filed 01/13/11 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOSHUA JOHNSON, ex rel. PAULA JOHNSON, on behalf of themselves

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 93 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 93 1 93-1. Definitions; practice of law. (a) Chapter 93. Certified Public Accountants. Definitions. As used in this Chapter certain terms are defined as follows: (1) An "accountant" is a person engaged in the

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/28/2013 INDEX NO. 157912/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/28/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/28/2013 INDEX NO. 157912/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/28/2013 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/28/2013 INDEX NO. 157912/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/28/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK VALENTINO SMITH, individually and on

More information

misleading labeling and marketing of merchandise it sells at its company-owned Levi s Outlet stores

misleading labeling and marketing of merchandise it sells at its company-owned Levi s Outlet stores 1 misleading labeling and marketing of merchandise it sells at its company-owned Levi s Outlet stores ( Levi s Outlet ).. During the Class Period (defined below), Levi s misrepresented the existence, nature

More information

Case5:15-cv-00404-HRL Document1 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 12

Case5:15-cv-00404-HRL Document1 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 12 Case:-cv-000-HRL Document Filed0// Page of 0 ERIC DONEY, #0 edoney@donahue.com JULIE E. HOFER, # jhofer@donahue.com ANDREW S. MACKAY, #0 amackay@donahue.com DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP Harrison Street, th Floor

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney GARY PLESSMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Fraud Section California State Bar No. 1 Room 1, Federal Building 00 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Robert S. Green (SBN ) James Robert Noblin (SBN ) GREEN & NOBLIN, P.C. -and- Telephone: Email: William B. Federman FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD Telephone: Email:

More information

* Each Will Comply With LR IA 10 2 Within 45 days Attorneys for Plaintiff, Goldman, Sachs & Co.

* Each Will Comply With LR IA 10 2 Within 45 days Attorneys for Plaintiff, Goldman, Sachs & Co. Case :-cv-00-lrh -WGC Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Stanley W. Parry Esq. Nevada Bar No. Jon T. Pearson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 0 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 00 North City Parkway, Suite 0 Las Vegas, NV 0 Telephone:

More information

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961

JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT I.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT I. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION JANICE LEE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BETHESDA HOSPITAL, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 84 Article 1 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 84 Article 1 1 Chapter 84. Attorneys-at-Law. Article 1. Qualifications of Attorney; Unauthorized Practice of Law. 84-1. Oaths taken in open court. Attorneys before they shall be admitted to practice law shall, in open

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 JANET M. HEROLD Regional Solicitor IAN H. ELIASOPH (CSBN Counsel for ERISA GRACE A. KIM, Trial Attorney (CSBN Office of the Solicitor United States Department

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING NO.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING NO. 1 1 1 1 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING KENDALL BAKER, individually and collectively on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, U.S. LEGAL

More information

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION Form 2:40-2 Complaint Negligence, Motor Vehicle IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ## JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR [COUNTY], FLORIDA [PLAINTIFF], Plaintiff, CASE NO.: ##-##### ## ## GENERAL JURISDICTION vs. [DEFENDANT

More information

4:10-cv-00701-TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

4:10-cv-00701-TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 4:10-cv-00701-TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

More information

SFS 2002:599 Group Proceedings Act Introductory provisions Group action Section 1 Group proceedings Section 2

SFS 2002:599 Group Proceedings Act Introductory provisions Group action Section 1 Group proceedings Section 2 1 Swedish Code of Statutes SFS 2002:599 issued by the printers in June 2002 Group Proceedings Act issued on 30 May 2002. The following is enacted in accordance with a decision1 by the Swedish Riksdag.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI State of Missouri ex rel. ) JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, ) Attorney General, ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No: vs. ) ) Division: ) ) Access Resource

More information