IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA"

Transcription

1 MICHAEL BARFIELD, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, Case No.: IMMEDIATE HEARING v. REQUESTED PURSUANT TO Fla. Stat (2009) BERNADETTE DIPINO, in her capacity as the Chief of Police for the Sarasota Police Department, and the CITY OF SARASOTA, a Florida municipality, Defendants. / VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO ENFORCE FLORIDA S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT AND FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, MICHAEL BARFIELD (hereinafter referred to as Barfield ), by and through his undersigned counsel, sues BERNADETE DIPINO, ( Chief DiPino ), in her capacity as Chief of Police of the Sarasota Police Department, ( SPD ) and the CITY OF SARASOTA, a Florida municipality ( the City ) (collectively the Defendants ), and alleges as follows: Introduction This is an action seeking declaratory relief for violations of the Florida Public Records Act by SPD, an agency of the City of Sarasota, Florida. Plaintiff contends that SPD has an administrative policy to overcharge for access to public records by charging $5 for a CD or DVD disk even the actual cost of reproducing public records on a disk is less than 25 cents. The agency s policy is to make a profit from having to comply with public records requests to discourage citizens from making such requests. This policy violates the Public Records Act because an agency may only charge the actual costs incurred in reproducing public records.

2 General Allegations Common to All Counts 1. This action concerns violations of Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (the Public Records Act ) by the Defendants. The Public Records Act violations arise out of a Fee Schedule ( Fee Schedule ) approved by the City Manager, City Clerk and City Attorney (the Charter Officers ) and the Records Manager on or about July 23, 2013, on which Chief DiPino has relied to charge an illegal and excessive flat fee (hereinafter Flat Fee ) in connection with responding to requests for public records by Florida citizens, including Barfield. 2. This action seeks declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief. 3. Barfield specifically seeks an order declaring the Fee Schedule invalid to the extent that it approves the imposition of an automatic Flat Fee that is illegal under the Public Records Act, enjoining the Chief DiPino from continuing to impose such illegal Flat Fee, and awarding Barfield his attorney's fees and costs. Additionally, Barfield requests that this matter be expedited pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes. Jurisdiction and Venue 4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 5(b) of the Florida Constitution and Section , Florida Statutes. 5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the City because it is a Florida municipality and public agency with offices and agents in Sarasota County. 6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Chief DiPino, because she is the Chief of Police in the City of Sarasota, Florida, is a public official and, upon information and belief, a resident of Sarasota County. 2

3 7. Venue is appropriate in Sarasota County because Chief DiPino and the City have offices for the transaction of their customary business in Sarasota County and the causes of action accrued in Sarasota County. The Parties 8. Barfield is a Florida citizen who resides in Sarasota County. 9. Barfield is a person as that term is used in the Public Records Act. See Fla. Stat (1)(a). 10. The City of Sarasota is a municipal corporation in Sarasota, Florida, and a public agency that provides access to public records in Sarasota County, Florida. The City is an agency subject to the Public Records Act. See Fla. Stat (2). 11. Chief DiPino is the Chief of Police for the Sarasota Police Department ( SPD ), an administrative agency of the City and, in that capacity, is the custodian of public records for the Sarasota Police Department. See Fla. Stat (1)(a). 12. Chief DiPino has a duty to permit the inspection, examination, and copying of the public records of the SPD by any person desiring to do so, at a reasonable time, under reasonable conditions, and for reasonable costs. See Fla. Stat ; Art. I, 24, Fla. Const. 13. The Charter Officers, through the authority set forth in the Charter of the City of Sarasota, are responsible for the enactment of Administrative Regulations and for approving the Fee Schedule under consideration in this case. 14. All conditions precedent to this action have occurred or have been excused or waived. 3

4 Factual Background Florida s Public Records Act 15. The right of access to public records applies to any public body, officer, or employee of the state... Fla. Const. Art. I, 24; see also Fla. Stat (2). 16. SPD, as an agency under Section (2), Florida Statutes, has an obligation to provide access to any non-exempt and non-confidential public records upon request in accordance with Section , Florida Statutes. 17. As the Chief of Police for SPD, Chief DiPino has an obligation to provide access to any non-exempt and non-confidential public records upon request in accordance with Section , Florida Statutes. 18. Further, Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution sets forth a constitutional right of access to any public record made or received in connection with the official business of any public body, officer or employee of the state, or persons acting on their behalf, unless the public record has been exempted by law pursuant to the constitutional provision or specifically made confidential by the Constitution. See Fla. Const. Art. I, The Public Records Act provides that the records custodian shall furnish a copy of public records upon payment of the fee prescribed by law. If no fee is prescribed by law, an agency is allowed to charge up to 15 cents per one-sided copy for copies that are 14" x 8 1/2" or less. See Fla. Stat (4)(a). Municipal ordinances do not constitute laws for purposes of this section. See Op. Att y Gen. Fla (1984). 20. If the nature and volume of the records to be copied requires extensive use of information technology resources or extensive clerical or supervisory assistance, or both, the agency may charge a reasonable service charge based on the actual cost incurred. See Fla. Stat (4)(d). The imposition of such a service charge, however, is dependent on the nature or 4

5 volume of the records requested, not on the cost to either develop or maintain the records or database system. Id. See also Op. Att y Gen. Fla (1999). 21. A determination of whether the nature or volume of the public records requires such extensive assistance must be made on a case-by-case basis, such that a special service charge may not be routinely imposed. See, e.g., Op. Att y Gen. Fla (2000); Op. Att y Gen. Fla (1984). 22. Chapter 119 represents a legislative scheme that seeks to control the subject of public records at all levels of government. The Florida Legislature has preempted local law with respect to the fees and charges that may be imposed on those who seek access to public records. Consequently, while a municipality may enact an ordinance establishing a set fee for duplication of public records, it may do so only if the fee reflects the actual cost of duplication as defined in the Public Records Act. See Op. Att y Gen. Fla (1985). As noted above, the actual cost of duplication includes only the cost of the material and supplies used to duplicate the record, but does not include the labor costs or overhead costs associated with such duplication. Fla. Stat (1)(a). 23. Importantly, the provision of access to public records is a statutory duty imposed by the Legislature on all records custodians and should not generally be considered a revenuegenerating operation See Op. Att y Gen. Fla (1985). Accordingly, absent specific statutory authority, agencies are not permitted to impose any such fee or charge or to render the furnishing of such records or copies thereof as a revenue-generating operation. Id. 5

6 Fee Schedule Approving Improper Fees for Public Records 24. On or about July 23, 2013, the Charter Officers approved an Administrative Regulation for Procedures for Public Records Requests No. 042-A (the Regulation ). See Exhibit 1, attached hereto. 25. The Regulation contains a Fee Schedule (the Fee Schedule ) pertaining to the costs for the production of public records. 26. The Fee Schedule purports to authorize any agency within the City, including SPD, to impose certain automatic fees relative to the production of public records including, without limitation, a $5.00 Flat Fee for DVD or CD data disks. 27. Upon information and belief, since the Regulation was adopted, SPD and the City repeatedly has charged and collected, and continues to charge and collect, an automatic $5.00 Flat Fee to persons requesting copies of public records in which the records are reproduced on a DVD or CD disk. 28. Upon information and belief, the Flat Fee is automatically charged in response to requests for any public records that are reproduced on a DVD or CD disk and has no relation to either the costs of duplication (which are separately reflected in the copying charges authorized by the Fee Schedule) or the actual amount of time needed to respond to the particular requests. This belief is based on statements made by representatives of the City and from fees collected in the past for public records reproduced on DVD or CD disks in response to requests made under the Public Records Act by Barfield. 29. To the extent that the Regulation and Fee Schedule approve the imposition of the automatic Flat Fee on requestors of public records, they directly conflict with the Public Records Act, under which [t]he provision of access to public records is a statutory duty imposed by the 6

7 Legislature upon all records custodians and should not generally be considered a revenuegenerating operation. Op. Att y Gen. Fla (1984). 30. Indeed, the Florida Attorney General previously has issued a written opinion stating that records custodians may not charge fees in excess of the costs authorized by the Public Records Act, whether that is the actual cost of duplication or, under appropriate circumstances, the special service charge for the use of information technology resources. Op. Att y Gen. Fla See also Op. Att y Gen. Fla Excessive Charges Imposed on Barfield 31. On October 9, 2015, Barfield made a written request to Chief DiPino for records in the possession of SPD relating to videos for body cameras worn by officers during an interim trial period. See Exhibit 2, attached hereto ( the records request ). 32. On October 15, 2014, SPD responded to the records request and attached an invoice cost sheet totaling $18, SPD itemized the charges by asserting that $16, was for more than 458 hours in time it would take a supervisor to review the request at the rate of $35 per hour. An additional $2,275 was listed as a charge for 455 DVD disks at the rate of $5.00 each. See Exhibit 3, attached hereto. 33. SPD does not pay $5.00 for each DVD disk. On information and belief, SPD pays less than.20 cents for each DVD disk. 34. SPD seeks to profit from making public records available by a margin in excess of 10,000 percent over and above its actual costs of duplication under the policy established in the Regulation. 35. On or about February 23, 2015, Barfield again requested the records. However, on February 25, 2015, SPD reiterated its position and stated that Barfield would need to pay half of 7

8 the itemized costs in advance in order to obtain access to public records. See Exhibit 4, attached hereto. 36. In addition, agents and representatives of SPD and the City made written comments on or about March 3, 2015, in which they reiterated that a portion of the itemized costs were for the Flat Fee for DVD disks to reproduce the requested records. 37. Barfield has not remitted payment for the unlawful Flat Fee and has not received the requested public records. 38. Barfield has retained the undersigned counsel in this matter. Count I Declaratory Relief Requested (Invalid Regulation and Fee Schedule) 39. Barfield incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through The Public Records Act does not authorize an automatic flat fee for responding to or fulfilling Public Records Act requests that exceeds the actual cost of duplication. 41. The Flat Fee purportedly authorized by the Regulation and Fee Schedule for fulfilling requests for reproduction of public records to a DVD or CD violates the Public Records Act and the Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution. 42. To the extent that the Regulation approves the impermissible Flat Fee set forth above and as set out in the Fee Schedule, the Regulation violates the Public Records Act and the Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution. 43. A dispute has arisen between Barfield and Defendants regarding these matters and Barfield requests that this Court determine the rights and obligations of Barfield as well as the Defendants. 8

9 Count II Injunctive Relief Requested (Imposition of Improper Fees) 44. Barfield incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through The Public Records Act does not authorize an automatic flat fee for responding to or fulfilling Public Records Act requests that exceeds the actual cost of duplication. 46. The Flat Fee purportedly authorized by the Regulation and Fee Schedule for fulfilling requests for reproduction of public records to a DVD or CD violates the Public Records Act and the Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution. 47. To the extent that the Regulation approves the impermissible Flat Fee set forth above and as set out in the Fee Schedule, the Regulation violates the Public Records Act and the Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution. 48. Upon information and belief, the City and Chief DiPino have charged and collected, and continues to charge and collect, improper fees for responding to public records requests for the reproduction of public records to a DVD or CD. 49. The Defendants imposition of such an impermissible Flat Fee as a condition of receiving copies of public records constitutes a denial of access to public records. 50. The Defendants denial of access to public records is unlawful under Sections (1) and (1)(a), Florida Statutes, and Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution. injury. 51. Violations of Section , Florida Statutes constitute an irreparable public 52. Barfield has a clear legal right to insist upon the performance of the Defendants duty to permit inspection and copying of public records without charging illegal or improper fees in violation of the Public Records Act. 9

10 53. Barfield has no adequate remedy at law. Attorneys Fees 54. The Public Records Act provides that [i]f a civil action is filed against an agency to enforce the provisions of this chapter and if the court determines that such agency unlawfully refused to permit a public record to be inspected or copied, the court shall assess and award, against the agency responsible, the reasonable costs of enforcement including reasonable attorneys fees. See Fla. Stat Expedited Hearing 55. Section , Florida Statutes, provides that courts are to set immediate hearings in actions to enforce the provisions of the Public Records Act and are to give such cases priority over other pending cases. Salvador v. Fennelly, 593 So. 2d 1091, 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (recognizing the importance of the statutory provision for immediate hearings in Public Records Act cases because time can be an important element in the right of access to public records ). 56. Therefore, Barfield requests an immediate hearing and that this case be given priority over other pending cases. Relief Requested WHEREFORE, Barfield requests that this Court: (a) (b) Set an immediate hearing pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes; Declare that the Regulation and Fee Schedule are unconstitutional and unlawful under Article I, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (2009), to the extent that they approve the imposition of illegal and unauthorized fees for reproducing public records subject to the Public Records Act on a DVD or CD disk; 10

11 (c) Enjoin the Defendants from continuing its practice under the Regulation of charging such illegal and unauthorized fees for responding to requests for records subject to the Public Records Act; (d) Order the Defendants to produce the requested records upon proper invoice of, and payment for, the statutorily authorized duplication charges of $.15 per page; (e) Award Barfield his reasonable attorneys fees, costs, and expenses incurred in this action, as provided in Section , Florida Statutes; and (f) Grant such further relief as the Court deems proper. VERIFICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF SARASOTA BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Michael Barfield, who, being first duly identified and sworn, deposes and says that that paragraphs 31 through 32, and 35 through 38 of this VERIFIED COMPLAINT are based on his actual personal knowledge, that this entire VERIFIED COMPLAINT is based on records and information available to him, and that are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief. He who is personally known to me/has produced as identification. By: Name: Michael Barfield Date: Printed/Typed Name: Eric Rossi Notary Public-State of Florida Commission Number: Expires: (SEAL) 11

12 Dated March 4, Respectfully submitted, /s/ Andrea Flynn Mogensen ANDREA FLYNN MOGENSEN, Esquire The Law Office of Andrea Flynn Mogensen, P.A. 200 South Washington Boulevard, Suite 7 Sarasota FL Telephone: Fax: Florida Bar No Attorney for Plaintiff 12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19 3/4/2015 SarasotaCriminalLawyer.com Mail Public records request To: Stephen Moyer; Corinne Stannish Subject: Fwd: Additional records request Please ensure we reply to this request. Thank you. Chief DiPino Begin forwarded message: From: Date: October 9, 2014 at 17:17:54 EDT To: Bernadette DiPino Subject: Additional records request Reply To: Chief: We talked a few months back about body cameras. I know the department used them on a trial basis last year. Can you please provide me with any records relating to their use last year, including any stored video/audio? Thanks. Michael Barfield Legal Consultant Law Office of Andrea Flynn Mogensen, P.A. 200 S. Washington Blvd., Suite 7 Sarasota, FL (941) (office) (941) (direct) THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT IMPORTANT NOTICE Please be advised that I am not an attorney and not authorized to render any legal advice or recommendation. This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the addressee. It may contain information which is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, use, or any action or reliance on this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (941) or by return e mail and delete the message, along with any attachments. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=31e123ef3a&view=pt&q=in%3asent%20bernadette.dipino%40sarasotagov.com&qs=true&search=query&msg=1491 2/3

20 3/4/2015 SarasotaCriminalLawyer.com Mail Public records request Tax Advice Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. Please consider the environment before printing this e mail. Under Florida law, e mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. E mail messages sent or received by City of Sarasota officials and employees in connection with official City business are public records subject to disclosure under the Florida Public Records Act. Under Florida law, e mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. E mail messages sent or received by City of Sarasota officials and employees in connection with official City business are public records subject to disclosure under the Florida Public Records Act. Invoice Cost Sheet for PR Body Cameras.pdf 73K https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=31e123ef3a&view=pt&q=in%3asent%20bernadette.dipino%40sarasotagov.com&qs=true&search=query&msg=1491 3/3

21

22

23

24 3/4/2015 SarasotaCriminalLawyer.com Mail Public Records Request with official City business are public records subject to disclosure under the Florida Public Records Act. Previous Request and Estimate.pdf 173K https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=31e123ef3a&view=pt&q=karen.mcgowan%40sarasotagov.com&qs=true&search=query&msg=14bc22e86a2e96a9 2/2

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Petitioners, v. Case No. 2014-CA-

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Petitioners, v. Case No. 2014-CA- Filing # 14355865 Electronically Filed 06/03/2014 11:33:02 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA, INC., and

More information

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. KIM WALLANT and LOUIS BOREK, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, FREEDOM

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEAN KUMANCHIK, vs. Plaintiff, Case No.: UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD d/b/a UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, a Florida

More information

Florida Senate - 2016 SB 872

Florida Senate - 2016 SB 872 By Senator Bean 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A bill to be entitled An act relating to federal immigration enforcement; providing a short title; creating

More information

COMPLAINT. sues Defendants Eastern Florida State College and Dr. Janies H. Richey and says:

COMPLAINT. sues Defendants Eastern Florida State College and Dr. Janies H. Richey and says: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOR THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: DIVISION: FLORIDA CARRY, INC, a Florida non-profit corporation, v. Plaintiff, EASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE,

More information

When will the City of Tampa respond to my records request? What records are not open for inspection or will not be disclosed?

When will the City of Tampa respond to my records request? What records are not open for inspection or will not be disclosed? How to Request Public Records What are public "records"? How can I request a public record? How can I request a readily available document? Are there fees involved? How do I pay for records retrieved?

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT I.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT I. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION JANICE LEE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BETHESDA HOSPITAL, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE : STATE OF CONNECTICUT, and : STATE OF CONNECTICUT : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Civ. No. : HEALTH NET OF THE NORTHEAST, INC., : HEALTH

More information

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 2. COGA promotes the expansion of oil and gas supplies, markets, and transportation infrastructure.

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 2. COGA promotes the expansion of oil and gas supplies, markets, and transportation infrastructure. DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO 1777 Sixth Street Boulder, CO 80302 Plaintiff: COLORADO OIL & GAS ASSOCIATION v. Defendant: COURT USE ONLY Case No. Division/Courtroom: CITY OF LAFAYETTE, COLORADO

More information

NO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Now comes, Tommy Adkisson, individually, in his official capacity as Bexar County

NO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Now comes, Tommy Adkisson, individually, in his official capacity as Bexar County NO. Filed 10 June 24 P12:29 Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza District Clerk Travis District D-1-GN-10-002120 TOMMY ADKISSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND OFFICIALLY ON BEHALF OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, AS COUNTY COMMISSIONERPCT.4

More information

Case 1:13-cv-22082-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2013 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:13-cv-22082-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2013 Page 1 of 5 Case 1:13-cv-22082-CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2013 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff,

More information

COMPLAINT. NOW COMES Plaintiff, BRANDON SMITH, by his undersigned attorneys, LOEVY &

COMPLAINT. NOW COMES Plaintiff, BRANDON SMITH, by his undersigned attorneys, LOEVY & CALENDAR: 03 PAGE 1 of 14 CIRCUIT COURT OF IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS CHANCERY DIVISION COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION CLERK DOROTHY BROWN BRANDON SMITH,

More information

Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a

Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION Case Number XXX A.C.G., J.G.M., on behalf of themselves and ) all others similarly situated, ) Plaintiffs )

More information

Please read and execute the attached Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).

Please read and execute the attached Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT Please read and execute the attached Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). The LAWA NDA must

More information

CASE NO. 1D14-2653. Karusha Y. Sharpe, John K. Londot and M. Hope Keating, of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. Tallahassee, for Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D14-2653. Karusha Y. Sharpe, John K. Londot and M. Hope Keating, of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. Tallahassee, for Appellee. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CONSUMER RIGHTS, LLC, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.

More information

Sub. H.B. 9 * 126th General Assembly (As Reported by H. Civil and Commercial Law)

Sub. H.B. 9 * 126th General Assembly (As Reported by H. Civil and Commercial Law) Aida S. Montano Bill Analysis Legislative Service Commission Sub. H.B. 9 * 126th General Assembly (As Reported by H. Civil and Commercial Law) Reps. Oelslager, Flowers, Buehrer, White, Trakas BILL SUMMARY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION Case 4:14-cv-00397-RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION JOSEPH REILLY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly

More information

AIA Document A310 TM 2010

AIA Document A310 TM 2010 AIA Document A310 TM 2010 Bid Bond CONTRACTOR: OWNER: «Lane County» «125 East Eighth Avenue BOND AMOUNT: $ PROJECT: (Name, location or address, and Project number, if any) «Lane County Adult Corrections

More information

Sec. 90-27. Certificates of use.

Sec. 90-27. Certificates of use. Sec. 90-27. Certificates of use. (1) It is hereby deemed unlawful for any person to open or operate any business and/or occupy any structure within the town limits for the privilege of engaging in any

More information

Illinois Compiled Statutes. HIGHER EDUCATION (110 ILCS 1005/) Private College Act.

Illinois Compiled Statutes. HIGHER EDUCATION (110 ILCS 1005/) Private College Act. Illinois Compiled Statutes HIGHER EDUCATION (110 ILCS 1005/) Private College Act. (110 ILCS 1005/0.01) (from Ch. 144, par. 120) Sec. 0.01. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Private College Act.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MICHAEL TANKERSLEY, 1060 N. Montana Street, Arlington, VA 22205, v. Plaintiff JAMES W. ALMAND, in his official capacity as Trustee of the Client

More information

ORDINANCE NO Section 2. Findings. The Board of County Commissioners relies upon the following findings in the adoption of this Ordinance:

ORDINANCE NO Section 2. Findings. The Board of County Commissioners relies upon the following findings in the adoption of this Ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 14-57 AN ORDINANCE OF MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, REGARDING PUBLIC FINANCE; PROVIDING FOR PURPOSE AND INTENT; PROVIDING FINDINGS; AMENDING SECTION 2-29-24 OF THE MANATEE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES,

More information

LANDLORDS AND TENANTS. Rent Escrow

LANDLORDS AND TENANTS. Rent Escrow LANDLORDS AND TENANTS Rent Escrow (THIS SECTION WAS NOT REVISED IN 10/04) The Landlord and Tenant Law is contained in Chapter 5321. It became effective November 4, 1974. Frequently, Forcible Entry (Chapter

More information

Secretary of the Senate. Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Private Secretary of the Governor

Secretary of the Senate. Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Private Secretary of the Governor Senate Bill No. 467 Passed the Senate September 10, 2013 Secretary of the Senate Passed the Assembly September 9, 2013 Chief Clerk of the Assembly This bill was received by the Governor this day of, 2013,

More information

ANNEX 1 PERFORMANCE BOND

ANNEX 1 PERFORMANCE BOND ANNEX 1 PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS, (the Developer ) is obligated to the Village of Lake in the Hills, an Illinois municipal corporation located in McHenry County, Illinois (the Village), to construct public

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC. and ) REBECCA BREED, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. ) v. ) ) KIPLING L. MCVAY in

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA H.L. WATKINS AND COMPANY, INC., ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. v. ) ) 06-CV8980-3 THE HOT LEAD COMPANY, LLC, ) ROBERT MICHAEL HORNE, )

More information

Terms and Conditions for Tax Services

Terms and Conditions for Tax Services Terms and Conditions for Tax Services In the course of delivering services relating to tax return preparation, tax advisory, and assistance in tax controversy matters, Brady, Martz & Associates, P.C. (we

More information

Document A312 TM SURETY. (Name, legal status and principal place of business)

Document A312 TM SURETY. (Name, legal status and principal place of business) Performance Bond Document A312 TM 2010 CONTRACTOR: (Name, legal status and address) OWNER: (Name, legal status and address) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Date: Amount: $ Description: (Name and location) Uninterruptible

More information

Credit Application And Agreement. End Use / End User Certification. Form 5401 93 REV. 1 1/2009 Page 1 of 11

Credit Application And Agreement. End Use / End User Certification. Form 5401 93 REV. 1 1/2009 Page 1 of 11 Credit Application And Agreement End Use / End User Certification Form 5401 93 REV. 1 1/2009 Page 1 of 11 CREDIT APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT I. Company Information: Business Name: Type of Business: Telephone

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA N. Scottsdale Rd., Ste. 0 0 Jeffrey S. Kaufman, Esq. JEFFREY S. KAUFMAN, LTD. N. Scottsdale Road, Ste. 0 (0-000 Bar No. 00 Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER Case 1:14-cv-05919-JEI-KMW Document 19 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 84 Frank L. Corrado, Esquire Attorney ID No. 022221983 BARRY, CORRADO & GRASSI, PC 2700 Pacific Avenue Wildwood, NJ 08260 (609)

More information

Case 1:16-cv-00320-CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv-00320-CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 116-cv-00320-CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID # 1 Frank J. Martinez (FJM-2149) THE MARTINEZ GROUP PLLC 55 Washington Street, Suite 253-C Brooklyn, New York 11201 718.797.2341 Telephone

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION FREDERICK FREEMAN, Plaintiff, CASE NO. v. MONARCH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; A foreign corporation. Defendant. / COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY

More information

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Case No.: v. Plaintiff, BASS PRELITIGATION

More information

The State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

The State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection STUART RABNER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY R.J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street PO Box 093 Trenton, NJ 08625-0093 Attorney for Plaintiff State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Environmental

More information

Case 3:15-cv-00592-LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv-00592-LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-lab-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. Attorney General VANITA GUPTA Acting Assistant Attorney General STEVEN H. ROSENBAUM Chief, Housing and Civil Enforcement Section ELIZABETH

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. No. I. INTRODUCTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. No. I. INTRODUCTION 1 1 1 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY DANIEL MADISON, SEBRINA MOORE, LARENCE BOLDEN, BEVERLY DUBOIS, and DANIELLE GARNER, v. Plaintiffs, STATE OF WASHINGTON; GARY LOCKE, Governor,

More information

SENATE... No. 2299. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts. In the Year Two Thousand Fourteen

SENATE... No. 2299. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts. In the Year Two Thousand Fourteen SENATE.............. No. 2299 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts In the Year Two Thousand Fourteen SENATE, Wednesday, July 23, 2014 The committee on Ways and Means, to whom was referred the Senate Bill

More information

Document A312 TM SURETY. (Name, legal status and principal place of business)

Document A312 TM SURETY. (Name, legal status and principal place of business) Payment Bond Document A312 TM 2010 CONTRACTOR: (Name, legal status and address) OWNER: (Name, legal status and address) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Date: Amount: $ Description: (Name and location) Uninterruptible

More information

COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFF ECOSMART, LLC AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST CARLOS ANTONIO CABRERA

COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFF ECOSMART, LLC AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST CARLOS ANTONIO CABRERA Case 1:12-cv-20231-JAL Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2012 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ECOSMART US, LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company,

More information

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE HOWARD COURT ) SS: COUNTY OF HOWARD ) CAUSE NO.: APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY IN CIVIL CASE

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE HOWARD COURT ) SS: COUNTY OF HOWARD ) CAUSE NO.: APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY IN CIVIL CASE STATE OF INDIANA IN THE HOWARD COURT SS: COUNTY OF HOWARD CAUSE NO.: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE, Plaintiff, v. DAVE EVANS TIRE, INC. and DAVE EVANS, Defendants. APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY IN CIVIL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION WAYNE WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PROTECT SECURITY, LLC. Defendant.

More information

Rules for Admission to the Practice of Law in West Virginia

Rules for Admission to the Practice of Law in West Virginia STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA At a Regular Term of the Supreme Court of Appeals, continued and held at Charleston, Kanawha County, on September 29, 2014, the following order was made and entered: Re: Approval

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. ) CASE NO. ATTORNEY GENERAL ) MICHAEL DEWINE ) JUDGE 30 E. Broad St., 14 th Floor ) Columbus, Ohio 43215 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) V.

More information

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND District Court, Denver County, Colorado 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 GUILLERMO ARTEAGA-GOMEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE FILED: January 22, 2015 6:02

More information

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING/EXPUNGING AN ADULT CRIMINAL COURT RECORD

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING/EXPUNGING AN ADULT CRIMINAL COURT RECORD INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING/EXPUNGING AN ADULT CRIMINAL COURT RECORD Complete the following paperwork for this process: Step 1. Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) Certificate of Eligibility packet

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their CASE 0:13-cv-00873-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 04/15/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Michael A. Ofor, Case No: Plaintiff, v. Steven Lecy, and City of Minneapolis, NOTICE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No. TREVOR A. GRIMM, State Bar No. JONATHAN M. COUPAL, State Bar No. 1 TIMOTHY A. BITTLE, State Bar No. 00 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation 1 Eleventh Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 1 (1-0 Attorneys for

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MOBILE TRANSFORMATION LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff

More information

CAUSE NO. ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF. v. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF. v. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NO. Filed 13 July 19 P3:43 Sherri Adelstein District Clerk Denton District ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Defendant.

More information

MARC D. LAVIK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. PC 11- : DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, : DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, : STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, : COMPLAINT

MARC D. LAVIK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. PC 11- : DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, : DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, : STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, : COMPLAINT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC SUPERIOR COURT MARC D. LAVIK, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. PC 11- DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, Defendant. COMPLAINT Parties and

More information

Case 1:10-cv-03183 Document 1 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv-03183 Document 1 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case 1:10-cv-03183 Document 1 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JEFFREY ALLEN, Individually and ) on behalf of other

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA BENJAMIN T. BROWN, Plaintiff, CASE NO. v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; A foreign corporation. Defendant.

More information

PENNSYLVANIA SUNSHINE ACT 65 Pa.C.S.A. 701. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Sunshine Act.

PENNSYLVANIA SUNSHINE ACT 65 Pa.C.S.A. 701. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Sunshine Act. PENNSYLVANIA SUNSHINE ACT 65 Pa.C.S.A. 701 701. Short title of chapter This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Sunshine Act. 702. Legislative findings and declaration (a) Findings.--The General

More information

SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO OFFICIAL RECORDS KEN BURKE, CPA CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER PINELLAS COUNTY, FL

SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO OFFICIAL RECORDS KEN BURKE, CPA CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER PINELLAS COUNTY, FL KEN BURKE, CPA CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER PINELLAS COUNTY, FL This agreement is made and entered into by and between, Ken Burke, CPA, Pinellas County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT ORDER OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT ORDER OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT ORDER OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC WHEREAS, Ocwen Financial Corporation is a publicly traded Florida corporation headquartered in Atlanta,

More information

CHEROKEE TRIBAL COURT EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS CHEROKEE, NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO.

CHEROKEE TRIBAL COURT EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS CHEROKEE, NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. CHEROKEE TRIBAL COURT EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS CHEROKEE, NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. THE EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE ) INDIANS FOR JUSTICE & ACCOUNTABILITY, ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT FOR ) DECLARATORY

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. - CIV - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF BOCA RATON, ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT 1. This action

More information

ex rel. BILL LOCKYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

ex rel. BILL LOCKYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BILL LOCKYER Attorney General of the State of California RICHARD M. FRANK Chief Assistant Attorney General DENNIS ECKHART Senior Assistant Attorney General MICHELLE L. FOGLIANI Deputy Attorney General

More information

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTION TO THE HONORABLE

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, and THE OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY

More information

COMPLAINT. attorneys, LOEVY & LOEVY, and brings this suit to overturn Defendant CHICAGO PUBLIC

COMPLAINT. attorneys, LOEVY & LOEVY, and brings this suit to overturn Defendant CHICAGO PUBLIC CALENDAR: 10 PAGE 1 of 28 CIRCUIT COURT OF IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS CHANCERY DIVISION COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION CLERK DOROTHY BROWN BETTER GOVERNMENT

More information

VILLAGE OF PALMETTO BAY PUBLIC RECORD REQUEST POLICY

VILLAGE OF PALMETTO BAY PUBLIC RECORD REQUEST POLICY VILLAGE OF PALMETTO BAY PUBLIC RECORD REQUEST POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. III. IV. Scope Purpose References V. Definitions VI. VII. VIII. Policy Determination of Public Record for Village

More information

SURETY. and Title: (Any additional signatures appear on the last page of this Performance Bond.)

SURETY. and Title: (Any additional signatures appear on the last page of this Performance Bond.) Performance Bond Document A312 2010 CONTRACTOR: (Name, legal status and address) SURETY: (Name, legal status and principal place of business) OWNER: (Name, legal status and address) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 93 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 93 1 93-1. Definitions; practice of law. (a) Chapter 93. Certified Public Accountants. Definitions. As used in this Chapter certain terms are defined as follows: (1) An "accountant" is a person engaged in the

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) ron@consumersadvocates.com ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) alexis@consumersadvocates.com KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) kas@consumersadvocates.com

More information

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb0087-00

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb0087-00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A bill to be entitled An act relating to mortgage foreclosures; amending s. 95.11, F.S.; revising the limitations period for commencing

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI State of Missouri ex rel. ) JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, ) Attorney General, ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No: vs. ) ) Division: ) ) Access Resource

More information

Case 8:13-cv-01060-EAK-TBM Document 14 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 8:13-cv-01060-EAK-TBM Document 14 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:13-cv-01060-EAK-TBM Document 14 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 49 SUZANNE RAWLINS, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION v. Case No.: 8:13-cv-1060-EAK-TBM

More information

Health Plan Select, Inc. Business Associate Privacy Addendum To The Service Agreement

Health Plan Select, Inc. Business Associate Privacy Addendum To The Service Agreement This (hereinafter referred to as Addendum ) by and between Athens Area Health Plan Select, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as HPS ) a Covered Entity under HIPAA, and INSERT ORG NAME (hereinafter referred

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Cheryl Coryea ( Coryea or Plaintiff ), and Rochester Independent School District

More information

SUPERINTENDENT S EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT

SUPERINTENDENT S EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT SUPERINTENDENT S EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT is made this 16th day of January, 2007, between THE SCHOOL BOARD OF SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA ( Board ) and GARY W. NORRIS ( Superintendent or Dr. Norris

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS, INC., AND ROBERT T. MCQUEENEY, M.D., v. Plaintiffs, DANIEL I. WERFEL, ACTING COMMISSIONER

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - CENTRAL DIVISION. Plaintifl. Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - CENTRAL DIVISION. Plaintifl. Defendants. 1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California CATHERINE Z. YSRAEL Supervising Deputy Attorney General JUDITH FIORENTINI Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 1 West A Street, Suite 10 San Diego,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, and Civil Action

More information

INTRODUCTION. 1. The State of Maine and Securities Administrator (hereinafter collectively

INTRODUCTION. 1. The State of Maine and Securities Administrator (hereinafter collectively STATE OF MAINE YORK, ss. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-05- STATE OF MAINE and SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR, Plaintiffs, v. COMPLAINT LORI M. HEMINGS, Defendant. INTRODUCTION 1. The State of Maine

More information

NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS

NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Independent Contractor. A. It is understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR s employees) is an independent contractor and that no relationship of employer-employee

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-000-jah -CAB Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. (SBN: ) josh@westcoastlitigation.com Robert L. Hyde, Esq. (SBN: ) bob@westcoastlitigation.com Hyde & Swigart Camino Del Rio South,

More information

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. GARY E. MAES, individually and d/b/a

More information

(1) The term automatic telephone dialing system means equipment which has the capacity

(1) The term automatic telephone dialing system means equipment which has the capacity Telephone Consumer Protection Act 47 U.S.C. 227 SEC. 227. [47 U.S.C. 227] RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT (a) DEFINITIONS. As used in this section (1) The term automatic telephone dialing

More information

BENCHMARK MEDICAL LLC, BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

BENCHMARK MEDICAL LLC, BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT BENCHMARK MEDICAL LLC, BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT This BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) dated as of the signature below, (the Effective Date ), is entered into by and between the signing organization

More information

ATTORNEY EMPLOYEE SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT FOR REMOTE ACCESS TO TAZEWELLCOUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CASE DOCUMENTS

ATTORNEY EMPLOYEE SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT FOR REMOTE ACCESS TO TAZEWELLCOUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CASE DOCUMENTS ATTORNEY EMPLOYEE SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT FOR REMOTE ACCESS TO TAZEWELLCOUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CASE DOCUMENTS known as Officer of the Court Remote Access (OCRA) This Agreement is made and entered into by and

More information

4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 4:15-cv-00432-RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Ryan Michael Stinnett, on behalf of himself CASE

More information

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR OUTSIDE LEGAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF SCOTTSDALE

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR OUTSIDE LEGAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF SCOTTSDALE Bruce Washburn City Attorney s Office PHONE 480-312-2405 3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd. FAX 480-312-2548 Scottsdale, AZ 85254 WEB www.scottsdaleaz.gov REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR OUTSIDE LEGAL SERVICES FOR

More information

51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013

51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013 SENATE BILL 1ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, INTRODUCED BY Joseph Cervantes 1 ENDORSED BY THE COURTS, CORRECTIONS AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE AN ACT RELATING TO CIVIL ACTIONS; CLARIFYING

More information

Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9

Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9 Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:13-cv-61747-RSR KURT S. SOTO, an individual, on behalf

More information

Marketing Services Subscription Agreement

Marketing Services Subscription Agreement Fill out, print, sign, and fax to : 610-234 - 4281 Marketing Services Subscription Agreement This Marketing Services Subscription Agreement (this Agreement ), is entered into on this day of, 20 by and

More information

JOHN MURRAY ( Murray ), for his Complaint in this action against Defendant, Crystex Composites LLC ( Crystex ), alleges as follows:

JOHN MURRAY ( Murray ), for his Complaint in this action against Defendant, Crystex Composites LLC ( Crystex ), alleges as follows: Case 2:08-cv-02672-WHW-CCC Document 1 Filed 05/29/08 Page 1 of 10 ROBERT J. BASIL, ESQ. (RB3410) Collier & Basil, P.C. 1270 Broadway, Suite 305 New York, NY 10001 (917) 512-3066 (831) 536-1075 (fax) Attorneys

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. Plaintiffs, VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. Plaintiffs, VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MALCOLM CORK, LISMORE PARTNERS LLC, DR. JOHN HAUGHTON, MICHAEL CARR, PAUL GRANDE, ATHANASIOS TOMARAS, JONATHAN WATERS, GLENN CARTER, AIRDRIE PARTNERS I

More information

Business Associate Agreement

Business Associate Agreement This Business Associate Agreement Is Related To and a Part of the Following Underlying Agreement: Effective Date of Underlying Agreement: Vendor: Business Associate Agreement This Business Associate Agreement

More information

ATTORNEY SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT FOR REMOTE ACCESS TO TAZEWELL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CASE DOCUMENTS known as Officer of the Court Remote Access (OCRA)

ATTORNEY SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT FOR REMOTE ACCESS TO TAZEWELL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CASE DOCUMENTS known as Officer of the Court Remote Access (OCRA) ATTORNEY SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT FOR REMOTE ACCESS TO TAZEWELL COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CASE DOCUMENTS known as Officer of the Court Remote Access (OCRA) This Agreement is made and entered into by and between

More information

Sole Ownership Partnership Corporation Part A. General Information

Sole Ownership Partnership Corporation Part A. General Information Mail to: Capital Software 1331 East Grand River, Suite 203 Insurance Agent MVR Agreement East Lansing, MI 48823 Toll Free: (800) 832-4457 Fax: (517) 324-3468 Sole Ownership Partnership Corporation Part

More information

Credit Services Organization Act 24 O.S. 131 148

Credit Services Organization Act 24 O.S. 131 148 Credit Services Organization Act 24 O.S. 131 148 Chapter 8 Credit Services Organization Act Section 131 Short Title This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Credit Services Organization Act". Added

More information

IN RE: SKECHERS TONING SHOE : CASE: 3:11-md-02308-TBR PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION : : MDL No.: 2308

IN RE: SKECHERS TONING SHOE : CASE: 3:11-md-02308-TBR PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION : : MDL No.: 2308 Case 3:11-md-02308-TBR-LLK Document 68 Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1322 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTIRCT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION IN RE: SKECHERS TONING SHOE : CASE: 3:11-md-02308-TBR

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COLORADO CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR, a Colorado non-profit corporation; COLORADO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM COALITION, a Colorado

More information

SAN FRANCISCO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 96: COORDINATION BETWEEN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF CITIZEN COMPLAINTS

SAN FRANCISCO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 96: COORDINATION BETWEEN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF CITIZEN COMPLAINTS SAN FRANCISCO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 96: COORDINATION BETWEEN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF CITIZEN COMPLAINTS SEC. 96.1. DEFINITIONS. (a) "Chief of Police" shall mean the Chief of the Police

More information

Case 2:14-cv-00644-DB Document 2 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:14-cv-00644-DB Document 2 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 10 Case 2:14-cv-00644-DB Document 2 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 10 STEWART GOLLAN USB # 12524 UTAH LEGAL CLINIC Cooperating Attorneys for UTAH CIVIL RIGHTS & LIBERTIES FOUNDATION, INC. 214 East Fifth South Street

More information

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (On Call Real Estate Broker Services)

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (On Call Real Estate Broker Services) INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (On Call Real Estate Broker Services) THIS AGREEMENT (Contract") is made this 14th day of December, 2010, between the Board of County Commissioners of Sumter County, Florida

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION W. ANDREW MCCULLOUGH, L.L.C. (2170) Attorney for Plaintiffs 6885 South State St., Suite 200 Midvale, UT 84047 Telephone: (801) 565-0894 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL

More information