1 ALAN HIMMELFARB - SBN 00 KAMBEREDELSON, LLP Leonis Boulevard Vernon, California 00 Telephone: ( - JAY EDELSON MICHAEL J. ASCHENBRENER KAMBEREDELSON, LLC 0 N. LaSalle St. Suite 100 Chicago, IL 0 Telephone: ( -0 Fax: ( - ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL TURNER, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, STORM, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Defendant. Case No. FOR: (1 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 1 U.S.C. 0; ( California Computer Crime Law, Cal. Penal Code 0; ( Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code 100; and ( Breach of Contract DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CLASS ACTION
2 Plaintiff, by his attorneys, upon personal knowledge as to himself and his own acts and upon information and belief as to all other matters, alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiff, Michael Turner ( Plaintiff or Mr. Turner, brings this class action complaint against Defendant Storm, LLC ( Storm or Defendant, headquartered in Redwood City, California, for its practice of accessing, collecting, and transmitting without notice or consent the wireless telephone numbers of iphone users who download Storm s games to their iphones via Apple s App Store.. Storm makes video games for use and play on Apple iphone and ipod Touch wireless devices. Its games are: World War, imobsters, Racing Live, Vampires Live, Kingdoms Live, Zombies Live, and Rockstars Live. While users can play its games for free, certain versions are available for a fee, and game players have the opportunity to spend large sums of real money in both the free and paid versions in order to help advance through the games levels.. The wireless telephone numbers of users phones are not used or necessary to play any of Storm s games, yet Storm has written the software for all its games in such a way that it automatically accesses, collects, and transmits the wireless telephone number of each iphone user who downloads any Storm game. It does so without disclosing this to any user before or after the fact. PARTIES. Plaintiff Michael Turner is a resident of Lynnwood, Washington. He owns an iphone and has downloaded multiple Storm games to his iphone.. Defendant Storm, LLC sells and distributes games through the iphone App Store for use on iphone and ipod Touch devices. It is a California Limited Liability Company headquartered in San Mateo County, California, at Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite
3 , Redwood City, California 0. Storm, LLC does business throughout the State of California and the nation. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to U.S.C. 11. This Court further has original jurisdiction over this action pursuant to U.S.C. 1(d, because (a at least one member of the putative class is a citizen of a state different from Defendants, (b the amount in controversy exceeds $,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and (c none of the exceptions under that subsection apply to this action. Personal jurisdiction and Venue are proper because Storm is an LLC headquartered in San Mateo County and/or because the improper conduct alleged in this Complaint occurred in, was directed from, and/or emanated or exported from California. INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule -(d, this case shall be assigned to either the San Francisco Division or the Oakland Division. FACTS. Storm s games are known as massively multiplayer online games ( MMOs or MMOGs. These games allow users to compete against each other live in real time by utilizing the wireless internet connections present in iphone and ipod Touch devices.. Storm claims on its website that its games have been downloaded more than 0 million times and that its games are the number one role-playing games for the iphone and ipod Touch.. As of November, 00, five of Storm s games ranked in the Top 0 downloaded free apps in Apple s App Store and seven of its games ranked in the Top 0 Free Apps.
4 Even the free versions of its games provide the opportunity for users to spend money in the game in order to accrue points, weapons, and other features that enhance game play. 1. As with all authorized iphone Apps, Storm s games are only available through Apple s App Store, which is accessible directly from iphones and ipod Touches or via the itunes software program, which is available on Macintosh and Windows-based computers. 1. Apple does not provide to sellers the personal information of iphone or ipod Touch users to App Store developers, such as Storm. 1. To make games (or any Apps, for that matter for the iphone and ipod Touch, developers must use the iphone Software Development Kit ( SDK. The iphone SDK does not provide direct access to iphone or ipod Touch users personal information. 1. In fact, the Apple SDK sandboxes Apps, such as Storm s games, from the global properties of iphones and ipod Touches. In computer security-speak, a sandbox is a security method for separating running programs. The result is that iphones are designed in such a way as to prevent Apps from accessing the wireless phone number of the iphones on which they are installed. 1. There exists, however, a hidden and unauthorized method through which an App, such as a Storm game, is able to access the phone number of the iphone on which it is installed. 1. Storm, though, has no reason whatsoever to access the wireless phone numbers of the iphones on which its games are installed. 1. Nonetheless, Storm makes use of this backdoor method to access, collect, and transmit the wireless phone numbers of the iphones on which its games are installed. Storm does so or has done so in all of its games.
5 Storm does not provide any notice to consumers that it collects the wireless phone numbers of the iphones on which its games are installed. Accordingly, Storm does not obtain consent or authorization from consumers before, during, or after collecting their wireless phone numbers. 1. On or about August, 00, Storm acknowledged it had been accessing, collecting, and transmitting user phone numbers after the press reported the problem and members of the Storm user community brought their concerns to Storm s attention. 1 Storm responded as follows: Thanks again for alerting us of the situation. We did have a bug that has been fixed. The updated app will need to go through the regular review process. You should expect to see it live shortly in the app store. Once again we thank you for bringing this to our attention and apologize to our users for the oversight. Regards, [Name] Storm Support Team. Storm s characterizations of its practice of harvesting phone numbers as a bug and an oversight are false. Storm could not have accidentally harvested its users phone numbers it used very specific and specialized software code to do so. 1 Please see and for additional details.
6 FACTS RELATING TO PLAINTIFF. Mr. Turner owns an iphone with a U.S. phone number and with wireless service provided by AT&T.. During the months of July 00 and August 00, Mr. Turner downloaded all of Storm s games form Apple s App Store and installed them on his iphone.. Mr. Turner has spent approximately $0 on Storm game enhancements.. As a result of downloading and installing Storm s games, Storm harvested his wireless telephone number without notifying him or obtaining his consent. CLASS ALLEGATIONS. Plaintiff Turner brings this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. (b( and ( on behalf of himself and two classes: a. The Free App Class. All individuals and entities in the United States who own or have owned an Apple iphone, iphone G, or iphone GS who downloaded and installed any of Storm, LLC s applications and whose wireless phone numbers were obtained by Storm, LLC. b. The Paid App Class. All individuals and entities in the United States who own or have owned an Apple iphone, iphone G, or iphone GS who downloaded and installed any of Storm, LLC s applications, who paid money to Storm, and whose wireless phone numbers were obtained by Storm, LLC. Excluded from the Classes are Defendant, its legal representatives, assigns, and successors, and any entity in which Defendant has a controlling interest. Also excluded is the judge to whom this case is assigned and the judge s immediate family.. The Classes consist of millions of individuals and other entities, making joinder impractical.. The claims of Plaintiff are typical of the claims of all of the other members of the Classes.
7 Plaintiff will fairly and adequately represent and protect the interests of the other members of the Classes. Plaintiff has retained counsel with substantial experience in prosecuting complex litigation and class actions. Plaintiff and his counsel are committed to vigorously prosecuting this action on behalf of the members of the Classes, and have the financial resources to do so. Neither Plaintiff nor his counsel have any interest adverse to those of the other members of the Classes. 1. Absent a class action, most members of the Classes would find the cost of litigating their claims to be prohibitive and will have no effective remedy. The class treatment of common questions of law and fact is also superior to multiple individual actions or piecemeal litigation in that it conserves the resources of the courts and the litigants, and promotes consistency and efficiency of adjudication.. Storm has acted and failed to act on grounds generally applicable to Plaintiff and the other members of the Classes, requiring the Court s imposition of uniform relief to ensure compatible standards of conduct toward the members of the Classes.. The factual and legal bases of Storm s liability to Plaintiff and to the other members of the Classes are the same, resulting in injury to Plaintiff and all of the other members of the Classes. Plaintiff and the other members of the Classes have all suffered harm and damages as a result of Storm s wrongful conduct.. There are many questions of law and fact common to the claims of Plaintiff and the other members of the Classes, and those questions predominate over any questions that may affect individual members of the Classes. Common questions for the Classes include but are not limited to the following: (a whether Storm s conduct described herein violates the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act; (b whether Storm s conduct described herein violates California s Computer Crime Law; and,
8 (c whether Storm s practices constitute unfair and deceptive acts or practices; (d whether Storm s practices constitute breach of contract The questions of law and fact common to the members of the classes predominate over any questions affecting only individual members and a class action is superior to all other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy.. Plaintiff reserves the right to revise these definitions based on facts learned in discovery. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of 1 U.S.C. 0, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act ( CFAA (on behalf of Plaintiff and both Classes. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations.. Storm violated 1 U.S.C. 0(a((A(i by knowingly causing the transmission of a command embedded within Storm games downloaded from Apple s App Store to access, collect, and transmit the wireless phone numbers of its users to Plaintiff and Class members iphones, which are protected computers as defined in 1 U.S.C. 0(e((B because they are used in interstate commerce and/or communication. By accessing, collecting, and transmitting Plaintiff and Class members wireless phone numbers, Storm intentionally caused damage without authorization to those iphones by impairing the integrity of information and/or data.. Storm violated 1 U.S.C. 0(a((A(iii by intentionally accessing Plaintiff and Class members iphones protected computers without authorization, and as a result, caused damage to Plaintiff and Class members iphones by impairing the integrity of information and/or data.
9 As a result of these takings, Storm s conduct has caused a loss to one or more persons during any one-year period aggregating at least $,000 in value in real economic damages. 1. Plaintiff and Class members have additionally suffered loss by reason of these violations, including, without limitation, violation of the right of privacy.. Storm s unlawful access to Plaintiff s iphone has also caused Plaintiff irreparable injury. Unless restrained and enjoined, Storm will continue to commit such acts. Plaintiff s remedy at law is not adequate to compensate it for these inflicted and threatened injuries, entitling Plaintiff to remedies including injunctive relief as provided by 0(g. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of Cal. Penal Code 0, California s Computer Crime Law ( CCCL (on behalf of Plaintiff and both Classes. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations.. Storm knowingly used data, computers, computer systems, or computer networks by accessing, collecting, and transmitting Plaintiff and Class members wireless phone numbers in order to wrongfully control or obtain data the phone numbers in violation of 0(c(1.. Storm knowingly accessed and without permission took, copied, or made use of Plaintiff and Class members wireless phone numbers in violation of 0(c(.. Storm knowingly and without permission used or caused to be used computer services by impermissibly accessing, collecting, and transmitting Plaintiff and Class members wireless phone numbers stored on their iphones in violation of 0(c(.. Storm knowingly and without permission provided or assisted in providing a means of accessing a computer, computer system, or computer network by creating a command that allowed it to impermissibly access, collect, and transmit Plaintiff and Class members wireless phone numbers in violation of 0(c(.
10 Storm knowingly and without permission accessed or caused to be accessed Plaintiff and Class members iphone computers by impermissibly accessing, collecting, and transmitting Plaintiff and Class members wireless phone numbers in violation of 0(c(.. Storm knowingly introduced a computer contaminant, as defined in 0(b(, by introducing computer instructions designed to record or transmit information Plaintiff and Class members wireless phone numbers on Plaintiff and Class members iphones without the intent or permission of the owners of that information in violation of 0(c(. 0. As a direct and proximate result of Storm s unlawful conduct within the meaning of 0, Storm has caused loss to Plaintiff and Class members in an amount to be proven at trial. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover his attorneys fees pursuant to 0(e. 1. Plaintiff and Class members have also suffered irreparable injury from these acts, including the harvesting of their personal information (wireless phone numbers. Accordingly, Plaintiff and Class members have no adequate remedy at law, entitling them to injunctive relief. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of Cal. Bus. Prof. Code 100 (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Paid App Class. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations.. Section 100 proscribes unfair business competition and defines this to include any unfair, unlawful, or fraudulent business practice or act.. Storm violated through its conduct alleged above, including its unlawful violations of the CFAA and the CCCL.. Storm violated including its unfair practice of covertly accessing, collecting, and transmitting the wireless phone numbers of the purchasers of its iphone games.
11 Storm, through its acts of unfair competition, has obtained money at the expense of Plaintiff and Class members by charging for the paid versions of its games and by charging for game enhancements to both the paid and free versions of its games. Plaintiff asks that this Court restore this money to Plaintiff and Class members and enjoin Storm from continuing its illegal practices. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION Breach of Contract (on behalf of Plaintiff and both Classes. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations.. Plaintiff and members of all Classes entered into identical agreements with Storm that does not allow Storm to collect their phone numbers by means of the backdoor mechanism described above.. Storm expressly and/or impliedly agreed to carry out its obligations in good faith and fair dealing. 0. Storm breached its contractual obligations, including its obligation of good faith and fair dealing, by accessing, collecting, and transmitting Plaintiff and Class members wireless telephone numbers as described above. 1. Plaintiff and Class members have performed their obligations under the contracts.. The aforementioned breaches of contract have proximately caused Plaintiffs and the Classes economic injury and other damages. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, on behalf of themselves and the Classes, pray for the following relief: A. Certify this case as a class action on behalf of the Classes defined above, appoint Michael Turner as class representatives, and appoint his counsel as class counsel;
12 B. Declare that the actions of Storm, as set out above, violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the California Computer Crime Law, and the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code 100, and constitute breach of contract; C. As applicable to the Classes mutatis mutandis, awarding injunctive and equitable relief including, inter alia: (i prohibiting Storm from engaging in the acts alleged above; (ii requiring Storm to disgorge all of its ill-gotten gains to Plaintiff and the other Class members, or to whomever the Court deems appropriate; (iii requiring Storm to delete all data surreptitiously or otherwise collected through the acts alleged above; (iv requiring Storm to provide Plaintiff and the other class members a means to easily and permanently decline any participation in any data collection activities; (v awarding Plaintiff and Class members full restitution of all benefits wrongfully acquired by Storm by means of the wrongful conduct alleged herein; and (vi ordering an accounting and constructive trust imposed on the data, funds, or other assets obtained by unlawful means as alleged above, to avoid dissipation, fraudulent transfers, and/or concealment of such assets by Storm; D. Award damages, including statutory damages where applicable, to Plaintiff and Class members in an amount to be determined at trial; E. Award restitution against Storm for all money to which Plaintiff and the Classes are entitled in equity; F. Restrain Storm, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those in active concert or participation with them from continued access, collection, and transmission of Plaintiff and Class members wireless telephone numbers via preliminary and permanent injunction; G. Award Plaintiff and the Classes their reasonable litigation expenses and attorneys fees; H. Award Plaintiff and the Classes pre- and post-judgment interest, to the extent allowable;
Case:-cv-000-RS Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 Sean Reis (SBN 00 email@example.com EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP 00 Tomas Street, Suite 00 Rancho Santa Margarita, California Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( - Michael
Case :-cv-000-jah -CAB Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Joshua B. Swigart, Esq. (SBN: ) firstname.lastname@example.org Robert L. Hyde, Esq. (SBN: ) email@example.com Hyde & Swigart Camino Del Rio South,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION PAUL BARRETT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Case No. : CLASS ACTION
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) firstname.lastname@example.org ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) email@example.com KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) firstname.lastname@example.org
District Court, Denver County, Colorado 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 GUILLERMO ARTEAGA-GOMEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE FILED: January 22, 2015 6:02
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KELVIN BLEDSOE, Plaintiff, v. SAAQIN, INC., No. COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff Kelvin
Case 6:15-cv-00145-JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION SMARTFLASH LLC, and SMARTFLASH TECHNOLOGIES
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE DR. A. CEMAL EKIN, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, v. Plaintiff,
Case 1:15-cv-13004-GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KEITH MATHEWS On behalf of himself and Others similarly situated Plaintiff, Case
Case:-cv-0-JST Document Filed// Page of 0 Clayeo C. Arnold, California SBN 00 email@example.com Christine M. Doyle, California SBN 0 firstname.lastname@example.org CLAYEO C. ARNOLD, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
Case 2:09-cv-00064-GZS Document 1 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. ) DONNA L. HAMILTON,
Case 2:12-cv-04033-JEO Document 1 Filed 12/05/12 Page 1 of 11 FILED 2012 Dec-05 PM 04:01 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAROL PARKER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PARADE ENTERPRISES, LLC, No. 3:14-CV-08084-MAS-DEA AMENDED COMPLAINT
BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California HERSCHEL T. ELKINS Senior Assistant Attorney General ALBERT NORMAN SHELDEN Supervising Deputy Attorney General HOWARD WAYNE (State Bar No. ) Deputy
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION Case Number XXX A.C.G., J.G.M., on behalf of themselves and ) all others similarly situated, ) Plaintiffs )
CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA QUALITY BICYCLE PRODUCTS, INC. v. Plaintiff, BIKEBARON, LLC SINCLAIR IMPORTS, LLC and
Case 2:06-cv-15766-JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MAZZONI
JAMES C. STURDEVANT (SBN 94551 JESPER I. RASMUSSEN (SBN 121001 THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 475 Sansome Street, Suite 1750 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415 477-2410
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ) i'" 17-1 1 - - -a* 1, T Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) 3R BANCORP; ) ) 3R E-SOLUTIONS, INC.,
DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney GARY PLESSMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Fraud Section California State Bar No. 1 Room 1, Federal Building 00 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles,
Case 4:13-cv-00594 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 03/06/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civ. No.: VERMA HOLDINGS,
Case 113-cv-11944 Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Robert Pegg, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Collecto,
CORY GROSHEK, and all others, similarly situated, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 TIME WARNER CABLE INC. Defendant. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiff,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, and STEVE C. LEE, Acting Director of the New
Case: 3:12-cv-00012-wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/05/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN FATWALLET, INC., a Delaware corporation, v. ANDREW CHIU, an individual, and
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 STEPHEN CALKINS General Counsel ANN I. JONES RAYMOND E. McKOWN Federal Trade Commission 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite Los Angeles, California 00 ( -00 JOHN ANDREW SINGER Federal Trade Commission
Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:13-cv-61747-RSR KURT S. SOTO, an individual, on behalf
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Case No.: v. Plaintiff, BASS PRELITIGATION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. KIM WALLANT and LOUIS BOREK, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, FREEDOM
1 misleading labeling and marketing of merchandise it sells at its company-owned Levi s Outlet stores ( Levi s Outlet ).. During the Class Period (defined below), Levi s misrepresented the existence, nature
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of Michael Millen Attorney at Law (#) Calle Marguerita Ste. 0 Telephone: Fax: (0) -0 email@example.com Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ZOIS FILED JUL -I A 10: 38 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Plaintiff, v. Intersections Inc., Defendant.
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 LAKESHORE LAW CENTER Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. (State Bar No. 0 0 Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite 0-0 Yorba Linda, CA --0 --0 (fax firstname.lastname@example.org Attorney and Plaintiff
1 1 Plaintiffs Steve Yourke and Kristin Richards ( Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated United States residents, allege the following: INTRODUCTION 1. This is a civil action
Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 9:13-cv-80670-KAM AJA DE LOS SANTOS, an individual, on
MARK K. SCHONFELD (MS-2798) REGIONAL DIRECTOR Attorney for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Northeast Regional Office 3 World Financial Center New York, New York 1028 1 (212) 336-0077 (Gizzi)
Case 313-cv-01686-JBA Document 1 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Renee Wheeler, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs,
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of 0 JINA L. CHOI (Admitted in New York) MICHAEL S. DICKE (CA BAR NO. ) (email@example.com) ERIN E. SCHNEIDER (CA BAR NO. ) (firstname.lastname@example.org) KASHYA K. SHEI (CA BAR NO.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 WILLIAM E. KOVACIC General Counsel KATHERINE ROMANO SCHNACK THERESE L. TULLY Federal Trade Commission East Monroe Street, Suite Chicago, Illinois 00 (1 0- [Ph.] (1 0-00 [Fax] FAYE CHEN
- "'. --, -.:li ') " :::; ),-~ --' DA VlD SHONKA Acting General Counsel 2 BARBARA Y.K. CHUN, Cal. BarNo. 0 3 JOHN D. JACOBS, Cal. Bar No. 1344 Federal Trade Commission 4 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 00 Los Angeles,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. WEBVIPER, LLC; d/b/a Yellow Web Services; and TIGERHAWK, LLC; d/b/a Yellow
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Robert S. Green (SBN ) James Robert Noblin (SBN ) GREEN & NOBLIN, P.C. -and- Telephone: Email: William B. Federman FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD Telephone: Email:
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS JACOB R. HORN; BENTON RAWLON BARBER (A.K.A. RANDY BARBER); d/b/a 1 DAY ROOF; ROOF ALL TEXAS; JUDICIAL DISTRICT ROOFTEAMS
Case:-cv-00 Document Filed0// Page of 0 SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP JAMES C. SHAH (SBN 0) ROSE F. LUZON (SBN ) One California Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Phone: -- Fax: -00- email@example.com
Case: 1:10-cv-03314 Document #: 17 Filed: 09/30/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:63 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION JAMES ROWE, ) individually and on
9:10-cv-01756-MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON xxxxxxxxxxxdivision BEAUFORT ) Jonathon Rowles, individually
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil No. CONTROLSCAN, INC., ) a corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD., MITSUBISHI HEAVY
Case 1:13-cv-21304-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2013 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff,
Case 1:14-cv-00652 Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION * FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, * * Civil Case No. Plaintiff, * * v.
Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 12 ORIGH~~AL EXECSUMMITS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILEDINCLERK'Sorn NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA u.s.o.c. -A~nCE
Case 6:14-cv-00008-JA-DAB Document 53 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1974 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and STATE OF FLORIDA,
Case 2:14-cv-01620-KOB Document 1 Filed 08/20/14 Page 1 of 38 FILED 2014 Aug-21 AM 11:13 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN
VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL
Case 1:14-cv-01830-RC Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 9 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, CC-10232 Washington, DC 20580 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILI!D
Case 3:14-cv-01824-M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BEST LITTLE PROMOHOUSE IN TEXAS LLC, Plaintiffs,
Case 1:14-cv-12193-WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PRIVATE BUSINESS JETS, L.L.C. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. PRVT, Inc. Defendant. COMPLAINT
Case 1:10-cv-00168-JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SMART VENT INC., : : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION NO.: : : : USA FLOODAIR VENTS,
Case: 3:14-cv-00062-bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/31/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION, v. APPLE INC., Plaintiff, Case
Case 1:11-cv-00434 Document 1 Filed 05/31/11 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Plaintiff, U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Defendant.
Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed// Page of WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 0 (CA) MARCIA L. MITCHELL, SBN (WA) DERA A. SMITH, SBN (CA) U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Phillip Burton Federal Building 0
Case:-cv-000-HRL Document Filed0// Page of 0 ERIC DONEY, #0 firstname.lastname@example.org JULIE E. HOFER, # email@example.com ANDREW S. MACKAY, #0 firstname.lastname@example.org DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP Harrison Street, th Floor
... ~- - -... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintitl: COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF Mikael Marczak, a/k/a
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-13121 v. FAIRWARNING, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Iatric Systems, Inc.
Case:-cv-000-LHK Document Filed0// Page of JOSH A. KREVITT (CA SBN ) email@example.com H. MARK LYON (CA SBN ) firstname.lastname@example.org GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 0- Telephone:
CIVIL DICTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA LESTER ANSARDI, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED SUIT NO. PLAINTIFF VERSUS UNITED STATES MARITIME SERVICES, INC., UNITED
4:10-cv-00701-TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
Andrew W. Stavros (8615) Austin B. Egan (13203) STAVROS LAW P.C. 11693 South 700 East, Suite 200 Draper, Utah 84020 Tel: (801) 758.7604 Fax: (801) 893.3573 Email: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed0// Page of MICHAEL G. RHODES () (email@example.com) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: Facsimile: BRENDAN J. HUGHES (pro hac vice to be filed) (firstname.lastname@example.org)
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/28/2013 INDEX NO. 157912/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/28/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK VALENTINO SMITH, individually and on
Case 2:12-cv-07481-SRC-CLW Document 1 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1 Michael D. Camarinos, Esq. Mavroudis, Rizzo & Guarino, LLC Attorneys at Law 690 Kinderkamack Road Oradell, New Jersey 07649 Telephone:
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Case No. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT v. SUMMIT ASSET STRATEGIES
JEFFREY E. BRUNTON #2833 Office of Consumer Protection 235 South Beretania Street, Room 801 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813-2437 Telephone: 586-2636 Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 92 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE APPLE INC., vs. Plaintiff, High Tech Computer Corp., a/k/a HTC Corp., HTC (B.V.I.
Case 1:15-cv-05107 Document 1 Filed 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------x PEGGY CABRERA,
Case 6:14-cv-00011-WSS Document 1-24 Filed 01/13/14 Page 1 of 35 EXHIBIT F Case 6:14-cv-00011-WSS Document 1-24 Filed 01/13/14 Page 2 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FEDERAL
Case 1:10-cv-20937-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2010 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case Number: DAVID SANTIAGO