1 1 The Reinsurance Price and the Insurance Cycle By Ursina B. Meier J. François Outreville Paper to be presented at the 30th Seminar of the European Group of Risk and Insurance Economists (EGRIE) to be held in Zurich on September 15-17, ABSTRACT: The fluctuations in the price of reinsurance during the past ten years have been documented recently in the business literature. Reinsurance allows a primary insurer to increase its premium volume by more than would otherwise be possible with a given amount of capital. If the price of reinsurance decreases, reinsurance becomes more affordable for insurance companies and this will be reflected in more capacity, price competition and at the end an increase in the loss and combined ratio. This paper examines the existence of an underwriting cycle in propertyliability insurance for France, Germany and Switzerland over the recent period in connection with the price of reinsurance in Europe during the same period. Correspondence: Ursina B. Meier J. Francois Outreville Brunnmattstrasse 69, UNOG - Palais des Nations 3007 Bern CH 1211 Geneva This preliminary paper shall not be replicated or quoted without the agreement of the authors. The opinions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Office at Geneva.
2 2 1. Introduction. The underwriting cycle in the property-liability insurance business is a recurring pattern of increases and decreases in insurance prices and profits. A number of studies presenting empirical assessments of this cycle have appeared in the literature over the past 20 years. Many of these studies have shown that the underwriting cycle does exist in many countries but there are still numerous debates on the causes of this cycle. Cummins and Outreville (1987) suggested that the cycle, as observed in the United States and in other developed countries, will also be present in other parts of the world through the proliferation of international reinsurance services. More recent research has demonstrated the presence and causes of this cycle in European countries and in Asian countries. However, there has been no study to determine the impact of reinsurance on insurance prices and profits. The underlying causes of volatility have apparently diminished in importance during the 1980s and this has caused some observers to suggest that the underwriting cycles have become obsolete. The fluctuations in the price of reinsurance during the past twenty years seems to contradict these opinions. If the price of reinsurance decreases, reinsurance becomes more affordable for insurance companies and this will be reflected in more capacity, price competition and at the end an increase in the loss and combined ratio. This paper examines the existence of an underwriting cycle in property-liability insurance for France, Germany and Switzerland over the recent period in connection with the price of reinsurance in Europe during the same period. This paper is organized as follows. The next section reviews the previous studies on the presence and causes of property-liability underwriting cycles. Section 3 and 4 describe the data and methods employed for testing the hypotheses on the existence of cycles for reinsurance and for insurance results in the three countries. The following section examines the cointegration of cycles between the reinsurance price and the loss ratio for the three countries. The last section presents the summary and discussions on the results. 2. Causes of the Underwriting Cycle. In a perfect market with rational expectations, insurers set pure premiums equal to the present value of expected future losses using all relevant information available to them. The price of insurance, i.e. premiums, is therefore the best predictor of future losses in the sense that it incorporates all information and measures expected losses with an error term uncorrelated with this information when the price is set. Over the last decade or more, a substantial body of insurance literature has developed attempting to explain a cyclical pattern of increases and decreases in insurance prices and profits in Property-Liability insurance. There is no generally accepted view of what the causes are and we can summarize the work into three main schools of thought: 1) disequilibrium between supply and demand, 2) external shocks and 3) general business influences. These views are not necessarily mutually exclusive since the rational expectations hypothesis implies that premiums are influenced by many factors other than the present value of expected future losses. This is briefly discussed in the following paragraphs:
3 3 Disequilibrium between supply and demand: Competition-driven prices Many authors have declared that the underwriting cycle was mainly caused by competition on prices due to the standardization of the property-liability business. This phenomenon has also been considered as an irrational behavior in order to maintain or gain market share. Insurers deviate in their pricing practices from the theoretical model by introducing an information on the behavior of competitors. They engage into excessive price competition followed by subsequent cutbacks in supply.[ Wilson (1981), Stewart (1984), Radach (1988), Harrington and Danzon (1994)]. Capacity constraints Other researchers have been skeptical about the assumption that insurers decide to cut prices or raise rates. Research has assumed that underwriting cycles are probably due to capacity constraints in the ability to supply insurance at some time. Prices not only depend on expected future loss payments but also on present and past values of capital and surplus. When there is a reduction of surplus due, for example, to unexpected losses, it is difficult for insurers to increase external capital due to the costs of raising new capital. This implies that shocks to capital affect the price and quantity of insurance supplied in the short-run. [ Winter (1988, 1991, 1994), Niehaus and Terry (1993), Gron ( 1990, 1994a, 1994b), Cummins and Danzon (1997), Froot and O'Connell (1997)]. Naïve rate-making process Cycles have also been attributed to the imperfection of the naïve rate-making processes used by insurers. There is a strong relationship between the premiums and lagged losses and extrapolative models always over or under-forecast the expected future losses. Losses paid are also related to the nature of the business written and with a long claim tail, losses paid variables include significant measurement errors. [ Outreville (1981), Smith (1984), Venezian (1985), Berger (1988), Niehaus and Terry (1993)]. External shocks: Interest rates As premiums are the outcome of discounted future losses, any changes in the interest rates would induce changes in premiums and interest rates could be a cause of cycles. Although there is no proof that interest rates themselves exhibit a cyclical behavior, an unexpected change in interest rate may create external shocks which could generate an underwriting cycle. 1 [ Wilson (1981), Doherty and Kang (1988), Smith (1989), Fields and Venezian (1989), Doherty and Garven (1992), Haley (1993), Lamm-Tennant and Weiss (1997), Fung, Lai, Patterson and Witt (1998)]. Regulatory and accounting lags Some authors have argued that the underwriting cycle is not caused by an irrational behavior but rather generated by the influence of external factors such as data collection lags, regulatory lags and accounting rules. [Cummins and Outreville ( 1987), Lamm-Tennant and Weiss (1997), Chen, Wong and Lee (1999)]. As an example, prior authorization rules in the United States create an increased variability in the underwriting results by delaying the rapid adjustment of 1 The major conclusion that can be drawn from Haley(1993) is that the underwriting results of P/L insurers and the risk-free interest rate were cointegrated over the period time and that a shock to interest rates had a permanent and negative effect on the underwriting results.
4 4 prices to new information. [ Witt and Miller (1981), Witt and Urrutia (1983), Harrington (1984), Outreville (1990), Tennyson (1991, 1993)]. Catastrophic losses Empirical evidence suggest that insurance premiums may increase by more than the discounted value of expected costs if large underwriting losses or investment losses are unexpectedly reported in a given market. A shock to capital in the form of unexpected claim payments on existing policies would deplete insurers' capital and shift back the short-run supply curve. If capital cannot be raised at relatively low cost, insurers have the choice of either increasing the probability of insolvency or reducing the amount of coverage at a given price. This situation is inherently temporary and adjustments create shocks that could generate an underwriting cycle. [Cummins, Harrington and Klein (1991), Harrington and Niehaus (1999)]. General business influences: General business cycle There are a number of studies on the relationship between the underwriting cycle and the general condition of the economy. The property-liability insurance business is obviously linked to the general economic performance of the national economy and may be related to changes in real prices or real GDP. [ Webb (1992), Grace and Hotchkiss (1995), Chen, Wong and Lee (1999), Meier (2001), Leng and Meier (2002)]. Business practices Greater risk management practices would be expected to reduce the effects of shocks and the shifts in demand and supply that may cause variability in the underwriting results. Possible evolution of the regulatory environment at national or international (global) level also has an impact on business, capital requirements and pricing policies. [Cummins, Harrington and Klein (1991), Winter (1991)]. 3. The Price of Reinsurance Reinsurance is either placed on a facultative basis, an obligatory basis or a combination of the two. In every type of proportional reinsurance, premium and claims are shared between the insurance company and the reinsurer in the proportion stipulated in the contractual agreement. The price the reinsurer pays for receiving the business is the "reinsurance commission." This commission, which the reinsurer pays to the ceding company, is normally expressed as a percentage of the original gross premium. In the market place, the nature of this price has become more commercial, it is determined by the nature and composition of the insurer's reinsured business and underwriting results form part of the criteria for agreeing on the actual percentage. In non-proportional reinsurance, no proportional distribution of premium and claims is fixed between the ceding company and reinsurer in advance. Distribution of claims depends on the actual claims amount. In calculating the risk premium, i.e. the price, the reinsurer takes into account the claims experience made during the previous years or the future loss expectancy according to the kind of risks involved. Since the technical reinsurance price varies according to the line of business and the type of contract, it is very difficult to get any price data in reinsurance and there is no price index for the reinsurance business overall. Swiss Re (2002) has proposed to use the price index for
5 5 "proportional property" as a dummy for the price of reinsurance. The index is based on Swiss Re's global book of proportional facultative property business. Because facultative business looks at single risks, the notion of quota-share or surplus is not relevant. Because of data collection problems, US business is lacking in the data set and therefore the European business determines the index. Figure 1 replicated from Swiss Re (2002) shows this reinsurance price index over the period versus the return on equity (ROE) of the US reinsurers and the changes in their equity (surplus). 2 Insert Figure 1 Property reinsurance business is typically subject to price cycles. Periods of several years with high premium levels are followed by phases with low reinsurance rates. From a business perspective, fluctuations in the reinsurance price can originate from the supply side as well as the demand side. In years with equity growth, low claims and high investment income, the supply of reinsurance capacity expands and prices fall. Inversely, low returns on investment and catastrophic losses cause prices to rise. As shown in Swiss Re (2002) ceding companies react to price increases by buying less cover and inversely, when reinsurance rates fall, buyers reduce retention, extend their ceded lines, and increase coverage for their clients. In principle, such a response to price fluctuations in reinsurance can lead to either an increase or a decrease in insurance prices and premium volume. Obviously, prices always rose when the return on equity in the reinsurance industry was low or negative (1984/85) but also following record losses caused by Hurricane Andrew (1993/94). The question whether or not the price index is following a cycle is an interesting one. We use the second-order autoregressive model proposed first by Venezian (1985) and developed by Cummins and Outreville (1987) to obtain the required parameters for testing the presence of a cycle under conditions of competitive markets and rational expectations. If all information were available concurrently, cycles would not exist under the rational expectations hypothesis. 3 The model is as follows: Xt = a 0 + a 1 X t-1 + a 2 X t-2 + w t Where Xt is the price index variable in period t and wt is a random error term. A cycle will be present if a 1 is greater than 0, a 2 less than 0 and a a 2 less than 0. The length of the cycle period can be expressed as follows: ( 1 2) -1 Period ( Π) = 2 π /cos a /2 a 2 The authors like to thank Mr. Rudolf Enz from Swiss Re for providing the data on the price index used in his study (Swiss Re, 2002). In this study, the price index is considered a perfect dummy variable for the world wide price development and compared with financial results available in the United States. 3 For a comment of the AR(2) process in empirical work see Leng and Venezian (2000).
6 6 For the period the results are as follows: Price t = [8.48] Price t [5.38]price t-2 R 2 = 0.79 Cycle = 8.74 There is no significant trend over the period and a significant cycle of 8 years and 9 months is calculated according to the formula. According to Swiss Re(2002), prices always rose when the return on equity in the reinsurance industry was low or negative. The model is extended by assuming that fluctuations in prices are also probably due to capacity constraints in the ability to supply reinsurance at some time. Prices not only depend on expected future loss payments but also on present and past values of the return on equity (ROE). The model is as follows: Xt = a 0 + a 1 X t-1 + a 2 X t-2 + b 1 Σ ROE t-i + w t Estimation over the period shows that none of the lagged value of ROE are significant. The results are summarized in the following equation: Price t = Price t Price t ROE t R 2 = 0.82 Cycle = 9.30 [8.64] [4.63] [2.05] Figure 1: Reinsurance Price Index and Equity (Source: Swiss Re, 2002) Reinsurance Return on Equity US Change in Equity US
7 7 4. The Insurance cycle in France, Germany and Switzerland Underwriting results from three countries, Germany, France and Switzerland are studied in this paper. The three markets are organized in a similar way, are close to each other and are probably affected by the same economic environment. Figure 2 shows the loss ratio of the three countries. We can see that the cyclical patterns are very similar over the period under study although fluctuations are more exacerbate in the French market since Since 1972, Germany and Switzerland exhibit very similar cyclical patterns. However, the loss ratio of Germany is about 8 to 10 percentage points higher than that of Switzerland. Leng and Meier (2002) found that a structural change happened in Germany and Switzerland in the beginning of the 70s and culminated in The loss ratio in Germany and Switzerland was consistently higher after Outreville (2002) found a similar pattern for France. Insert Figure 2 Table 1 shows the correlation coefficients of the loss ratios among the countries. The underwriting results of insurance markets in these countries are closely tied. Contrary to what was expected, over different sub-periods, the correlation coefficients are higher between France and Switzerland than between these countries and Germany. Insert Table 1 Figure 2: Loss ratios in the Three Countries France Switzerland Germany
8 8 Table 1: Correlation Coefficients of Loss Ratios among the Countries France/Germany France/Switzerland Germany/Switzerland Similarly to the previous section, we use the second-order autoregressive model to obtain the required parameters for testing the presence of a cycle under conditions of competitive markets and rational expectations. If the underwriting results of insurance markets in these countries are closely tied we should find similar results for the three countries. The coefficients of the simple AR(2) process have been estimated over several sub-periods with and without a trend variable. The results presented in Table 2 are very different according to the countries concerned. In France the cycle period is shorter and could only be calculated with the existence of a significant trend variable. In Switzerland, the trend variable is significant and affects the results for the longer periods of time. In Germany, the trend variable in never significant. Table 2: Cycle period for Loss Ratio Following an AR(2) Process The cycle period is calculated with and without a trend Without a trend France NS / NC NS / NC NS / NC Germany 9.93 NS / NC 8.88 Switzerland NS / NC With a trend France Germany NS / NC NS / NC NS / 7.95 Switzerland NS = Coefficients are non-significant NC = Cycle cannot be calculated One of the main argument for extending the Cummins-Outreville-type model is the assumption that all relevant information is included in the past loss experience. The analysis of the residuals from regressions analogous to the model of Cummins-Outreville shows that the residuals are not uncorrelated and still include cyclical oscillations [Meier, 2001]. This supports the
9 9 hypothesis of missing variables and from an insurance pricing theory point of view, the interest rate and the loss ratio should be cointegrated as shown in Haley(1993). 4 The model is tested over the most recent period , with and without a trend, and with the money market rate (MM) at time t. This variable is never significant for France and Switzerland and always significant for Germany. When this variable is introduced in the equation the calculated cycle for France is no more significant, the cycle period for Switzerland remains significant and similar to the one calculated before. The results of the estimation are presented in Table 3 below. The results without a trend variable for France and Switzerland are not significant and therefore not included in the table. Table 3: Estimation of the Extended Model with Money Market Rate: Variables LR t-1 LR t-2 Trend MM R 2 Cycle France NS/4.50 [0.69] [1.08] [1.90] [1.05] Switzerland [5.17] [2.74] [1.46] [0.23] Germany NS/4.75 [0.57] [0.42] [0.84] [4.19] NS/6.11 [1.58] [0.71] [2.61] Note: For all equations, the estimation is done with a constant term. In a recent paper, Venezian (2002), explains the problems encountered with the misspecification of the model when it is over-simplified. He shows that attempt to relate underwriting income to interest rates is misspecified unless the ratio of premiums to surplus and changes in tax rates are introduced in the model. Unfortunately data restrictions in European countries do not permit any validation of this hypothesis. A tentative graphical analysis is provided for France in Appendix Relationship Between the Insurance Cycle and the Reinsurance Price Index Another argument to extend the Cummins-Outreville-type model is the approach used in capacity-constraint models where the internal capital of the insurance firm is an essential variable. A negative relationship between capacity and insurance result is expected. Real frictions (adjustment costs) which prevent a fast adjustment to the long-run equilibrium, as well as market imperfections lead to temporary capacity constraints and therefore to insurance 4 Cointegration models for insurance cycles have captured the long-term dynamics of the economic environment but have been unable to investigate the length of insurance cycles. Recent work by Meier (2001) for Germany and Switzerland or Outreville (2002) for France did not found significant or consistent results in the countries considered.
10 10 cycles. Usually competitive markets are assumed in capacity constraint models and the fluctuations in price and quantity are only caused by supply fluctuations. Surplus cannot be adjusted in the short-run without incurring transactions and/or agency costs. The insurance market provides a simpler and more efficient method of capital allocation, namely reinsurance. Proportional reinsurance involves the sharing of risk proportionally between the insurer and the reinsurer. Reinsurance demand is influenced among other factors by regulatory constraints in capital and surplus and provides a tool to rapidly expand the amount of insurance written. 5 To limit insurer underwriting risk and the potential for insolvency, either industry practice, regulation or both place limits on the amount of leverage permitted. This is typically measured by the ratio of net premiums written to surplus and, by purchasing reinsurance, an insurer reduces its leverage. Reinsurance allows a primary insurer to increase its premium volume by more than would otherwise be possible with a given amount of capital. Reinsurance also enables insurers to circumvent the effect of tax considerations and international insurance trade barriers [ Garven and Loubergé, 1996]. If the price of reinsurance decreases, reinsurance becomes more affordable for insurance companies and this will be reflected in more capacity, price competition and at the end an increase in the loss and combined ratio. If reinsurance is a significant factor in the behavior of primary insurance companies, the price of reinsurance should have an immediate and negative impact. The lagged values of the price index should not impact on the decision of insurance companies. Therefore, following the capacity-constraint model ideas, the same logic applies to the price of reinsurance RE which should be considered as an additional variable in the model and the series must be stationary. In other words the coefficient λ in X t = λx t-1 + ψ t must be significantly less than 1. 6 This being validated for the loss ratio variables and the reinsurance price (Appendix 3), we can use the following model: LR t = a 0 + a 1 LR t-1 + a 2 LR t-2 + b i Σ RE t-i + ε t where LR t is the loss ratio and RE t-i is the reinsurance price index over the period Although a trend variable is not necessarily compatible with the idea of the model, it is estimated with and without a trend and with and without the money market rate. The estimations are presented in Table 4 with concurrent and lagged variables. As shown in Table 4, the estimation for the reinsurance variable is negative and significant in all the three countries and the lagged value is never significant as expected. 5 The problem of optimal reinsurance has only received limited attention in financial economics and insurance literature [ Doherty and Tinic (1981), Mayers and Smith (1982), Blazenco (1986), Garven (1987), Outreville (1995), Garven and Loubergé (1996)]. Mayers and Smith (1990) documents that factors such as ownership structure, firm size, geographic concentration and line-of-business concentration influence the demand for reinsurance. 6 See Dickey and Fuller (1979). The process that generates the series should also has time-invariant coefficients. This may not be the case as shown by Leng (2000) for the combined ratio in the United States.
11 11 For France, the cycle is no more significant, nor the trend varaible or the money market rate. Only the reinsurance price index is a significant variable explaining the fluctuations in the loss ratio over the period under study. 7 For Switzerland, the length of the cycle remains significant and similar to previous estimations. The trend variable and the money market rate are not significant and the reinsurance price index is negative and significant as expected. For Germany, there is no cycle and the reinsurance price index explains significantly the fluctuations of the loss ratio. As shown before, there is no trend variable and the money market rate is a significant variable. Insert Table 4 Table 4: Unconstrained Estimation of the Extended Model: Variables LR t-1 LR t-2 RE t RE t-1 Trend MM France [1.21] [0.18] [2.04] R 2 = 0.24 Cycle = NS / [0.85] [0.33] [0.66] [0.75] R 2 = 0.22 Cycle = NS / [0.68] [0.70] [1.60] [1.61] R 2 = 0.31 Cycle = NS / [0.47] [0.88] [1.86] [1.44] [0.78] R 2 = 0.30 Cycle = NS / For the first equation for the 3 countries the results are identical if the period is extended over
12 12 Table 4: Unconstrained Estimation of the Extended Model: Variables LR t-1 LR t-2 RE t RE t-1 Trend MM Switzerland [5.38] [2.21] [1.80] R 2 = 0.65 Cycle = [3.21] [1.42] [0.60] [0.20] R 2 = 0.61 Cycle = [5.19] [2.29] [1.21] [0.77] R 2 = 0.65 Cycle = [5.24] [1.90] [1.81] [0.48] R 2 = 0.64 Cycle = 8.90 Germany [2.81] [0.22] [1.92] R 2 = 0.46 Cycle = NS / NC [2.42] [0.21] [0.99] [0.05] R 2 = 0.43 Cycle = NS / NC [2.65] [0.35] [1.90] [0.54] R 2 = 0.44 Cycle = NS / NC [0.69] [1.19] [3.23] [3.80] R 2 = 0.71 Cycle = NS / NC Note: For all equations, the estimation is done with a constant term. R 2 is the adjusted value, NS = not significant, NC = not cyclical.
13 13 6. Summary and Concluding Remarks In this study, the cyclical pattern of the reinsurance price index and loss ratios for France, Germany and Switzerland are investigated over the recent period This article provides new evidence on the determinants of underwriting results. The reinsurance price index is a significant variable explaining the fluctuations of the loss ratio in the three countries. Through several model specification we can show empirical evidence for cycles in propertyliability insurance business in the three countries. However, the results seem not very robust over time and among the countries. The money market rate is a significant variable in the model for Germany but not for the two other countries. When dealing with reinsurance, an important caveat must be emphazized. Ideally, it would be best to conduct the tests using policy year loss data rather than calendar year data. Unfortunately, these data are not publicly available, and so calendar year loss data are used which probably creates a biais in the results.
14 14 7. References Berger, Lawrence A., 1988, A Model for the Underwriting Cycle in Property-Liability Insurance Industry, Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 55, p Blazenco, G., 1986, The Economics of Reinsurance, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 53, p Chen, Renbao, Kie Ann Wong and Hong Chew Lee, 1999, Underwriting Cycles in Asia, Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 66, p Cummins, J. David and J. Francois Outreville, 1987, An International Analysis of Underwriting Cycles, Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 54, p Cummins, J. David, Scott E. Harrington and Robert W. Klein, 1991, Cycles and Crises in Property-Casualty Insurance: Causes and Implications for Public Policy, 1991, Journal of Insurance Regulation, Fall, p Cummins, J. David and Patricia Danzon, 1997, Price, Financial Quality and Capital Flows in Insurance Markets, Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 6, p Dickey, David A. and Wayne A. Fuller, 1979, Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical association, vol. 74, June, p Doherty, Neil A. and S.M. Tinic, 1981, Reinsurance Under Conditions of Capital Market Equilibrium, Journal of Finance, vol. 36, p Doherty, Neil A. and Han Bin Kang, 1988, Interest Rates and Insurance Price Cycles, Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 12, p Doherty, Neil A. and James Garven, 1992, Insurance Cycles: Interest Rates and the Capacity Constraint Model, Journal of Business, vol. 68, p Fields, Joseph A. and Emilio C. Venezian, 1989, Interest Rates and Profit Cycles: A Disaggregated Approach, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 56, no.2, p Froot, Kenneth and Paul O'Connell, 1997, The Pricing of U.S. Catastrophe Reinsurance, Working Paper no.6043, National Bureau of Economic Research. Fung, Hung-Gay, Gene C. Lai, Gary C. Patterson and Robert C. Witt, 1998, Underwriting Cycles in Property and Liability Insurance: An Empirical Analysis of Industry and By-Line Data, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 65, no.4, p Garven, James R., 1987, On the Application of Finance Theory to the Insurance Firm, Journal of Financial Services Research, vol. 1, p Garven, James R. and Henri Loubergé, 1996, Reinsurance, Taxes and Efficiency: A Contingent Claims Model of Insurance Market Equilibrium, Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 5, p Grace Martin F. and Julie L Hotchkiss, 1995, External Impacts on Property-Liability Insurance Cycle, Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 62, p Gron, Anne, 1990, Property-Casualty Insurance Cycles, Capacity Constraints and Empirical Tests, Ph.D Thesis, Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Gron, Anne, 1994a, Capacity Constraints and Cycles in Property-Casualty Insurance Markets, Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 25, Spring, p
15 15 Gron, Anne, 1994b, Evidence of Capacity Constraints in Insurance Markets, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 37, October, p Haley, Joseph D., 1993, A Cointegration Analysis of the Relationship Between Underwriting Margins and Interest Rates: , The Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 60, no.3, p Harrington, Scott E., 1984, The Impact of Rate Regulation on Prices and Underwriting Results in the Property-Liability Insurance Industry, Journal of Risk and insurance, vol. 51, p Harrington, Scott E. and Patricia M. Danzon, 1994, Price Cutting in Liability Insurance Markets, Journal of Business, vol. 67, p Harrington, Scott E. and Greg Niehaus, 1999, Volatility and Underwriting Cycles, in Dionne G. (Ed.): Handbook of Insurance, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Lamm-Tennant, Joan and Mary A. Weiss, 1997, International Insurance Cycles: Rational Expectations/Institutional Intervention, Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 64, p Leng Chao-Chun, 2000, Underwriting Cycles: Stationarity and Stability, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Risk and Insurance Association in Baltimore, MD, USA. Leng Chao-Chun and Emilio Venezian, 2000, Underwriting Cycles: Is the Data Consistent with Rationally Priced Cycles?, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Risk and Insurance Association in Baltimore, MD, USA. Leng Chao-Chun and Ursina B. Meier, 2002, Analysis of Multi-National Underwriting Cycles in Property-Liability Insurance, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Risk and Insurance Association in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Mayers, D. and C.W. Smith, 1982, On the Corporate Demand for Insurance, Journal of Business, vol. 55, p Mayers, D. and C.W. Smith, 1990, On the Corporate Demand for Insurance: Evidence from the Reinsurance Market, Journal of Business, vol. 63, p Meier, Ursina B., 2001, Multi-National Underwriting Cycles in Property-Liability Insurance, Paper presented at the EGRIE Meeting in Strasbourg, France. Niehaus, Greg and Andy Terry, 1993, Evidence on the Time Series Properties of Insurance Premiums and Causes of the Underwriting Cycle, Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 60, p Outreville, J. François, 1981, Les Opérations des compagnies d assurances IARD: identification de modèles et simulation d hypothèses de conjoncture économique, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, vol. 6 (October), p Outreville, J. François, Underwriting Cycles and Rate Regulation in Automobile Insurance Markets, Journal of Insurance Regulation, vol. 8, p Outreville, J. François, 1995, reinsurance in Developing Countries, Journal of Reinsurance, vol. 2, Spring, p Outreville, J. François, 2002, Cycles in Insurance, Paris International Conference on Risk and Insurance, Les Entretiens de l'assurance, December. Radach, Floyd R., 1988, A Strategy for Cycle Management, Best s Review, June, p
16 16 Smith, Michael L., 1984, Property-Liability Insurance Markets, Taxation and Interest Rates, Proceedings, International Insurance Seminar, New Orleans. Smith, Michael L., 1989, Investment Returns and Yields to Holders of Insurance, Journal of Business, vol. 61, no.1, p Stewart, Barbara D., 1984, Profit Cycles in Property-Liability Insurance, in J.D. Long, Ed., Issues in Insurance, Malvern, PA: American Institute for P/L Underwriters. Swiss Re, 2002, The Insurance Cycle as an Entrepreneurial Challenge, Zurich: Swiss Reinsurance Company. Tennyson, Sharon, 1991, The Effect of Rate Regulation on Underwriting Cycles, CPCU Journal, vol. 44, p Tennyson, Sharon, 1993, Regulatory Lag in Automobile Insurance, Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 63, p Venezian, Emilio, 1985, Ratemaking Methods and Profit Cycles in Property and liability Insurance, Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 52, p Venezian, Emilio, 2002, Empirical Analysis on the Underwriting Cycle: An Evaluation, Assurances, vol. 70, July, p Webb, Bernard L., 1992, The Property and Liability Insurance Industry, Insurance Investment Management Handbook. Wilson, William C., 1981, The Underwriting Cycle and Investment Income, CPCU Journal, vol. 34, p Winter, Ralph A., 1988, The Liability Crisis and the Dynamics of Competitive Insurance Markets, Yale Journal of Regulation, vol. 5, no.2, p Winter, Ralph A., 1991, Solvency Regulation and the Property-Liability Insurance Cycle, Economic Inquiry, vol. 29, p Winter, Ralph A., 1994, The Dynamics of Competitive Insurance Markets, Journal of Financial Intermediation, vol. 3, p Witt, Robert C. and Harry Miller, 1981, Price Competition, Regulation and Systematic Underwriting Risk in Automobile Insurance Markets, CPCU Journal, vol. 34, p Witt, Robert C. and Jorge Urrutia, 1983, Price Competition, Regulation and Systematic Risk in Automobile Insurance, Geneva Papers on Risk and insurance, vol. 8, p
17 17 Appendix 1: Description of the Data Our study is based on yearly data. For France, Germany and Switzerland, premiums and losses for the domestic business from 1960 to 2001 are used to calculate the loss ratio. For Germany, the loss ratio is only available for West Germany until 1991, after which data are available for Germany as a whole. Data for the combined ratio are not used due to the lack of homogeneity in the data for Germany over the period under study. Yearly data for the reinsurance price index are only available from 1980 onwards. Appendix 2: Loss ratio, Combined ratio and Solvency ratio in France The empirical use of a second order autoregressive model may lead to serious misspecification problems if we ignore multiplicative variables such as the ratio of premiums to surplus. Unfortunately, due to data availability problems, some variables are often not included in empirical models. In France, the solvency ratio ( Capital and Surplus / Premiums) is only available since The following graph presents the series for France over the period for the loss ratio, the combined ratio and the solvency margin Combined ratio Loss ratio Solvency ratio Appendix 3: Stationarity of the Series X t = λx t-1 + ψ t with λ < 1.0 λ Loss ratio France 0.43 [2.04] Germany 0.64 [3.53] Switzerland 0.72 [4.01] Reinsurance price Index 0.72 [4.34]
VOLATILITY OR CYCLICALITY: THE POLISH NON-LIFE INSURANCE MARKET Piotr MANIKOWSKI Ph.D., Poznań University of Economics, Insurance Department al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland, E-mail: email@example.com
Firm-Level Data Analysis of the Effects of Net Investment Income on Underwriting Cycles: An Application of Simultaneous Equations Min-Ming Wen and Patricia Born * Abstract: This study tests two major theories
December 2010 N 12 Study of the impact of inflation and GDP growth on property-liability and life insurance premiums over the last 30 years: case of the G7 countries By Catherine Bruneau*, Professor, Université
Underwriting Cycles in German Property-Liability Insurance Martin Eling und Michael Luhnen Preprint Series: 2009-06 Fakultät für Mathematik und Wirtschaftswissenschaften UNIVERSITÄT ULM Underwriting Cycles
Insurers Underwriting Result and Investment Risk-Taking Behavior -- Evidence from U.S. Property and Casualty Insurance Industry Abstract: This paper presents an analysis about the impact of insurers underwriting
ARE UNDERWRITING CYCLES FORECASTABLE? ARE THEY STATISTICAL ACCIDENTS? M. Martin Boyer, CEFA Professor of Finance and Insurance Éric Jacquier, Professor of Finance Simon van Norden, Professor of Finance
Tort Liability, Insurance Rates, and the Insurance Cycle * Scott E. Harrington Abstract I provide an overview of volatility in premiums, coverage availability, and insurers reported profits in U.S. commercial
The Costs and Benefits of Reinsurance* by J. David Cummins Temple University 1301 Cecil B. Moore Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19122 Phone: (215) 204-8468 Fax: (610) 520-9790 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Georges
Analyzing U.S. Property & Casualty Commercial Insurance Market Conditions Introduction November 2014 Albert Risk Management Consultants has been analyzing the commercial insurance market for its United
Capital Allocation and the Price of Insurance: Evidence from the Merger and Acquisition Activity in the U.S. Property- Liability Insurance Industry Jeungbo Shim May 2007 ABSTRACT This paper examines empirically
The Satellite Insurance Market and Underwriting Cycles By Piotr Manikowski, Ph.D. Mary A. Weiss, Ph.D. Poznań University of Economics Risk, Ins., & Healthcare Mgmt Dep t Insurance Department Ritter Annex,
Business School W O R K I N G P A P E R S E R I E S Working Paper 2014-047 Cyclicity in the French Property- Liability Insurance Industry : New Findings over the Recent Period Catherine Bruneau Nadia Sghaier
The Effects of Rate Regulation on the Volatility of Auto Insurance Prices Evidence from Canada Darrell Leadbetter Jane Voll Erica Wieder Abstract Previous studies using U.S. data have found that rate regulation
Is the Forward Exchange Rate a Useful Indicator of the Future Exchange Rate? Emily Polito, Trinity College In the past two decades, there have been many empirical studies both in support of and opposing
The Costs and Benefits of Reinsurance J. David Cummins Georges Dionne Robert Gagné Abdelhakim Nouira June 2008 CIRRELT-2008-26 J. David Cummins 1, Georges Dionne 2,3*, Robert Gagné 2,4, Abdelhakim Nouira
An Examination of Capital Requirements for Canadian Property / Casualty Insurers Peter Carayannopoulos and Mary Kelly, School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada
The Performance of Risk Retention Groups: Does Organizational Form Matter? Yi Yao 1 Ph.D. Candidate Actuarial Science, Risk Management and Insurance Department Wisconsin School of Business University of
CAPITAL ALLOCATION FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES WHAT GOOD IS IT? By H e l m u t G r ü n d l, Berlin* and H a t o S c h m e i s e r, Berlin* SEPTEMBER 23, SECOND DRAFT JEL-KLASSIFICATION: G22, G3, G32 *Institut
Cassandra R. Cole (USA), Kathleen A. McCullough (USA), Lawrence S. Powell (USA) Collateralization of international liabilities in the U.S. insurance industry Abstract United States regulators and alien
The Distribution of Property/ Liability Insurance in Canada: Costs and Market Structure Mary Kelly * and Anne Kleffner ** Abstract: Studies in the U.S. show that insurers that operate as exclusive writers
Great (and not so Great) Expectations: An Endogenous Economic Explication of Insurance Cycles and Liability Crises by Gene C. Lai University of Rhode Island, USA, Robert C. Witt Deceased, University of
Measuring the capacity of China property-liability insurance industry to respond to catastrophic events Wang, Haiyan Wang, Bo Abstract: China is a natural disaster-prone country. Catastrophic event would
World Bank Distance Learning The Early Warning Test Ratios for General Insurers Washington, DC April 9, 2001 Lawrie Savage & Associates Inc. History of Early Warning Ratios Until early 1970's, everyone
The Role of Contingent Commissions in Property-Liability Insurer Underwriting Performance By Laureen Regan, Ph.D. Fox School of Business and Management Temple University Philadelphia, PA 19122 phone: 215-24-7264
PITFALLS IN TIME SERIES ANALYSIS Cliff Hurvich Stern School, NYU The t -Test If x 1,..., x n are independent and identically distributed with mean 0, and n is not too small, then t = x 0 s n has a standard
Stock vs. Mutual Insurers: Who Does and Who Should Charge More? Alexander Braun Przemys law Rymaszewski Hato Schmeiser Institute of Insurance Economics University of St.Gallen, Switzerland Madrid, June,
An Empirical Analysis of Property- Liability Insurance Distribution Systems: Market Shares Across Lines of Business Laureen Regan * Abstract: Tobit regression is used to analyze market shares for a cross
Review of "Capital Allocation for Insurance Companies" by Stewart C. Myers and James R. Read Jr. Paul J. Kneuer, FCAS, MAAA 377 Review of Capital Allocation for Insurance Companies ARIA Paper by Stewart
Switching Cost, Competition, and Pricing in the Property/Casualty Insurance Market for Large Commercial Accounts Lisa L. Posey * Abstract: With large commercial accounts, a small number of insurers negotiate
ERC Working Paper in Economic 03/10 November 2003 Testing The Quantity Theory of Money in Greece: A Note Erdal Özmen Department of Economics Middle East Technical University Ankara 06531, Turkey email@example.com
PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURANCE PRICING MODELS: AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION Stephen P. D Arcy and James R. Garven BIOGRAPHIES: Mr. D Arcy is Associate Professor of Finance at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
1 CHAPTER 11. AN OVEVIEW OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND QUARTERLY MODEL OF THE (BEQM) This model is the main tool in the suite of models employed by the staff and the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) in the construction
Laureen REGAN, PhD Department of Risk, Insurance and Healthcare Management 215-204-7264 (v) Fox School of Business and Management 215-204-4712 (f) Temple University firstname.lastname@example.org Philadelphia, PA 19122
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 8 (No 29, October 1983), 403-429 Price Competition, Regulation, and Systematic Underwriting Risk in Automobile Insurance by Robert C. Wtt * and Jorge Urrutia **
Optimal Capital Utilization By Financial Firms: Evidence From the Property-Liability Insurance Industry By J. David Cummins and Gregory Nini November 9, 2000 J. David Cummins Gregory Nini The Wharton School
Knowledge. Experience. Performance. THE POWER OF INSIGHT. sm Life Reinsurance Rejean Besner, FSA, MAAA, FCIA, FASSA Vice President & Chief Actuary, International Division Presented to the Conference on
Law360, New York (July 22, 2010) -- Congress recently conducted a hearing on H.R. 3424, legislation introduced by Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., that would deny deductions for certain reinsurance premiums
DETERMINANTS OF INSURANCE COMPANIES PROFITABILITY: AN ANALYSIS OF INSURANCE SECTOR OF PAKISTAN Hifza Malik Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Abbottabad Campus,
How Much Equity Does the Government Hold? Alan J. Auerbach University of California, Berkeley and NBER January 2004 This paper was presented at the 2004 Meetings of the American Economic Association. I
Author s Response To Michael G. Wacek s Discussion Of a Paper Published In Proceedings Volume XC Distribution-Based Pricing Formulas Are Not Arbitrage-Free By David L. Ruhm Author s reply to discussion
Edmonds Community College Macroeconomic Principles ECON 202C - Winter 2011 Online Course Instructor: Andy Williams Textbooks: Economics: Principles, Problems and Policies, 18th Edition, by McConnell, Brue,
Stochastic Analysis of Long-Term Multiple-Decrement Contracts Matthew Clark, FSA, MAAA, and Chad Runchey, FSA, MAAA Ernst & Young LLP Published in the July 2008 issue of the Actuarial Practice Forum Copyright
DNB Working Paper Loss shocks and the quantity and price of private export credit insurance: Evidence from a global insurer No. 462 / February 2015 Koen van der Veer Loss shocks and the quantity and price
INSURANCE RATING METHODOLOGY The primary function of PACRA is to evaluate the capacity and willingness of an entity / issuer to honor its financial obligations. Our ratings reflect an independent, professional
Independent Policy Reports are published by The Independent Institute, a nonprofit, nonpartisan, scholarly research and educational organization that sponsors comprehensive studies on the political economy
Report of Examination of Harleysville Insurance Company of Ohio Columbus, Ohio As of December 31, 2009 Table of Contents Subject Page Salutation... 1 Description of Company... 1 Scope of Examination...
ABSTRACT Using derivatives to hedge interest rate risk: A student exercise Jeff Donaldson University of Tampa Donald Flagg University of Tampa In a world of fluctuating asset prices, many firms find the
2013 PLUS D&O Symposium Specialty Insurance Where Are We Headed? David Cash Endurance Specialty New York - February 6-7, 2013 Keynote Outline 1. Who are the Specialty Companies? 2. Economic drivers for
Age to Age Factor Selection under Changing Development Chris G. Gross, ACAS, MAAA Introduction A common question faced by many actuaries when selecting loss development factors is whether to base the selected
Underwriting Strategy and Underwriting Cycle in the Medical Malpractice Insurance Industry Yu Lei Barney School of Business University of Hartford 200 Bloomfield Ave. West Hartford, CT Phone: 860-768-4682
Crises in Medical Malpractice Insurance: Evidence of Excessive Price-Cutting in the Preceding Soft Market Scott E. Harrington (contact author) Wharton School University of Pennsylvania 206 Colonial Penn
International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 5, No. 13; December 2014 Determinants of Financial Performance of General Insurance Underwriters in Kenya Mirie Mwangi, PhD Cyrus Iraya, PhD Lecturers
No. 11-1 Do Commodity Price Spikes Cause Long-Term Inflation? Geoffrey M.B. Tootell Abstract: This public policy brief examines the relationship between trend inflation and commodity price increases and
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT A. INTRODUCTION RETURN AS A RANDOM VARIABLE E(R) = the return around which the probability distribution is centered: the expected value or mean of the probability distribution of possible
1 Insurance Risks and Government Interventions Dwight M. Jaffee University of California, Berkeley Draft October 15, 2015 (Footnotes and Citations are Incomplete) I. Introduction This paper discusses the
Rethinking Fixed Income Challenging Conventional Wisdom May 2013 Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources. Rethinking Fixed Income: Challenging Conventional Wisdom With US Treasury interest rates at, or near,
Empirical Analysis of Surrender in the Taiwan Life Insurance Companies Yawen Hwang, Associate Professor Dept. of Risk Management and Insurance, Feng Chia University, Taiwan Email: email@example.com Peiying
Chap 3 CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models 1 Asset Pricing Model a logical extension of portfolio selection theory is to consider the equilibrium asset pricing consequences of investors individually
Technical Paper Series Congressional Budget Office Washington, DC FORECASTING DEPOSIT GROWTH: Forecasting BIF and SAIF Assessable and Insured Deposits Albert D. Metz Microeconomic and Financial Studies
Medical Net Discount Rates: An Investigation into the Total Offset Approach Andrew G. Kraynak Fall 2011 COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT HONORS PROGRAM Motivation When estimating the cost
Capital Structure of Non-life Insurance Firms in Japan Applied Economics and Finance Vol. 3, No. 3; August 2016 ISSN 2332-7294 E-ISSN 2332-7308 Published by Redfame Publishing URL: http://aef.redfame.com
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION 6, 3 38 (1997) ARTICLE NO. JF960205 Price, Financial Quality, and Capital Flows in Insurance Markets J. DAVID CUMMINS AND PATRICIA M. DANZON The Wharton School, University
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 5, No. 1; January 2015 The Effect of Capital Structure on the Financial Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Thika Sub-County, Kenya
A highly controversial proposed adjustment to estimated cash flows in the determination of fair value liabilities is the impact of the entity's (or obligor's) own credit standing. Under some proposals,
Assessing Sources of Funding for Insurance Risk Based Capital Louis Lee Session Number: (ex. MBR4) AGENDA for Today 1. Motivations of Capital Needs 2. Practical Risk Based Capital Funding Options 3. Types
Price Optimization and Regulation Las Vegas Ratemaking & Product Management Seminar March 2009 Arthur J. Schwartz, MAAA, FCAS Associate P&C Actuary North Carolina Department of Insurance Raleigh, NC What
Systemic Risk and the Insurance Industry J. David Cummins, Temple University The Brookings Institution Conference on Regulating Non-Bank SIFIs May 9, 2013 Copyright J. David Cummins, 2013, all rights reserved.
ECONOMIC QUESTIONS FOR THE MASTER'S EXAM Introduction 1. What is economics? Discuss the purpose and method of work of economists. Consider observation, induction, deduction and scientific criticism. 2.
Introduction of P/C Insurance Market in China Context Economic Environment in China P/C Insurance Market in China Development Status Market Potential P/C Insurance Regulation in China Overview Solvency
Information Technology Investment Melinda K. Cline, Texas Wesleyn University, USA Carl S. Guynes, University of North Texas, USA Ralph Reilly, University of Hartford, USA ABSTRACT Much evidence regarding
The Equity Premium in India Rajnish Mehra University of California, Santa Barbara and National Bureau of Economic Research January 06 Prepared for the Oxford Companion to Economics in India edited by Kaushik
LABUAN CAPTIVES Below is a general overview of Captives with particular information regarding Labuan International and Business Financial Centre (Labuan IBFC). Kensington Trust Labuan Limited is a licensed
Journal Of Financial And Strategic Decisions Volume 11 Number 1 Spring 1998 AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN OWNERSHIP ON THE VALUES OF U.S. COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES Arnold L. Redman * and N. S.
Quantitative Impact Study 1 (QIS1) Summary Report for Belgium 21 March 2006 1 Quantitative Impact Study 1 (QIS1) Summary Report for Belgium INTRODUCTORY REMARKS...4 1. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS...4 1.1. Market
This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Fiscal Policy and Management in East Asia, NBER-EASE, Volume 16 Volume Author/Editor: Takatoshi
Financial Institutions Center Financial Pricing of Insurance in the Multiple Line Insurance Company by Richard D. Phillips J. David Cummins Franklin Allen 96-09 THE WHARTON FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CENTER
Implied Volatility Skews in the Foreign Exchange Market Empirical Evidence from JPY and GBP: 1997-2002 The Leonard N. Stern School of Business Glucksman Institute for Research in Securities Markets Faculty
ABI RESPONSE TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION INQUIRY INTO THE EUROPEAN BUSINESS INSURANCE SECTOR PROFITABILITY AND CONCENTRATION IN THE UK GENERAL INSURANCE MARKET Report by ABI Research Department 10 April
International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 6, No. 4; April 2015 Dynamic Relationship between Interest Rate and Stock Price: Empirical Evidence from Colombo Stock Exchange AAMD Amarasinghe
I J A B E R, Vol. 13, No. 4, (2015): 1525-1534 TEMPORAL CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STOCK MARKET CAPITALIZATION, TRADE OPENNESS AND REAL GDP: EVIDENCE FROM THAILAND Komain Jiranyakul * Abstract: This study
KEITH J. CROCKER Smeal College of Business The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA 16802 phone: (814) 863-0664 fax: (814) 865-6284 email: kcrocker @ psu.edu Education: Ph.D. (Economics) Carnegie-Mellon