POLICY BRIEFING. Can the Work Programme Work for All User Groups?
|
|
- Merryl Gilbert
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Can the Work Programme Work for All User Groups? Author: Andrew Jones, LGiU Associate Date: 5 June 2013 Summary This report, available here is the second by the Work and Pensions Select Committee on the Work Programme (WP). The report covers the WP s performance during the first year of operations, supply chain management, and the Programme s payments structure, but most importantly its success in helping hard to place groups. It is concluded that the WP has the potential to support mainstream jobseeker groups, although it still has to overcome some teething problems. Money saved from lower-than expected performance payments should be used to support the most disadvantaged groups. It is also recommended that the Prime Contractors make effective use of the experience of local stakeholders, including local authorities and local business groups. This briefing will be of particular interest to members and officers involved with employment issues and economic development, but also with social care, housing, drug and alcohol issues, and voluntary and community groups. Briefing in full Background The Work Programme (WP) was launched in June Targeted primarily at the long-term unemployed, it has a number of distinctive features, including a smaller proportion of up-front fees than has been the case in previous employment schemes,
2 a reliance on a relatively small number of prime contractors (primes) to manage contract packages and supply chains, and considerable freedom for providers in designing solutions for jobseekers facing barriers to employment. This last feature is an extension of the so-called black box approach pioneered under the last Government in the Flexible New Deal. The WP s pricing model allows providers to claim higher payments for placing jobseekers facing the greatest challenges into sustained work, which is one of the more important design features to come under scrutiny in this inquiry. The primes are predominantly commercial companies with the capacity and cash flow (at least 20 million annual turnover) to bear the financial risk of operating on a results-based model. There are 18 primes delivering 40 separate contracts in 18 regional Contract Package Areas (CPAs). There are 16 CPAs covering the whole of England, and one each for Scotland and Wales. There are two or three primes operating in each CPA, the intention being that competition between primes will drive up performance. Primes were encouraged by the DWP to deliver services through supply chains of subcontractors from the private, public and voluntary sectors, including niche providers with specialist expertise. The Work and Pensions Committee s first report on the WP was published in May 2011 (available here). Although generally supportive, the Committee highlighted some concerns about the management and regulation of supply chains and whether the proposed differential pricing model would be sufficient to incentivise providers to support those furthest from the labour market. This second report is based on evidence from witnesses from across the welfare-towork industry, academics, the voluntary sector, and charities. It was also able to draw on the first published official evaluation studies of the WP, available here and here. The report deals with: The low job outcome performance of the WP in the first months of delivery. The role of Jobcentre Plus (JCP) in referring and handing over claimants to the WP and its role in sanctioning. WP providers approaches to engaging employers in the programme. The effectiveness of the differential pricing model. The accuracy of the Work Capability Assessment (WCA). The safeguards to ensure that all types of jobseekers receive an appropriate service within the black box. The availability of specialist support within WP supply chains and the regulation of the welfare-to-work market. Job Outcome Performance
3 Official WP job outcome performance data, covering the period from June 2011 to the end of July 2012, were published for the first time in November 2012 (see related briefings). Currently, the DWP now plans to publish the next set of data on 27 June 2013 and on a quarterly basis thereafter. The November 2012 data showed that job outcome performance in the first months of delivery was significantly lower than had been anticipated. The DWP had imposed contractual job outcome Minimum Performance Levels (MPLs), but none of the 18 primes reached the contractual year one MPL in the first months of delivery, meaning that technically they were all in breach of contract. The MPLs were considered by experts to be extremely challenging. One witness argued that the DWP s record of setting unrealistic welfare-to-work performance targets extends back to schemes operated under the last Government. However, it was also pointed out that the targets were set when the economy was expected to perform better than had actually been the case. Other reasons for underperformance included: The speed with which the WP was commissioned in comparison with earlier schemes. The restructuring of the employment services sector that accompanied the WP, including instances where primes had to set up operations in areas where they had never worked before. The Committee expressed concern about the appropriateness of the MPLs and how they were calculated by the DWP. It recommended that the DWP devise a new method of calculating and setting MPLs which are more responsive to the state of the economy, which can be more transparently calculated and applied, and which can be reviewed periodically during delivery. Where there are significant differences in job outcome performance between primes in the same CPA, the DWP has the option to shift 5 per cent of new referrals from the worst performing to the best performing. The market share shift can be applied from two years into the programme (June 2013) and subsequently every 12 months. Another option is contract termination. The Committee recommended that the DWP provide further information about how it has assessed the likely impacts of shifting market share between primes. Further, the Committee was unconvinced that the early termination of a prime s contract could be achieved without significant disruption to services and requested further details about the research DWP has conducted on this matter. Finally, it recommended that the DWP makes clear how it will protect highly-performing subcontractors attached to poorly performing primes. Three types of fees are available to providers:
4 Attachment fees - relatively small payments made when contact is first made between provider and participant; the DWP plans to withdraw attachment fees altogether from April Job outcome fees - larger payments made when the participant finds work, comes off benefits and remains in work for a total of up to 26 weeks within a 104-week period. Sustainment fees - monthly fees paid to providers for up to 80 subsequent weeks as long as the participant stays off benefits and in work. Some witnesses were concerned that low job outcome performance in the early months of the programme would impact on investment in future services. Some believed that funding was being reduced at the wrong time and that more funding was needed during a period of low economic growth and relatively high unemployment. Further, funding for the WP will be further reduced by the planned withdrawal of attachment fees from April One of the co-authors of the official DWP evaluation argued that attachment fees had thus far been a buffer that had kept the whole thing going. The Committee recommended that the DWP review the balance between attachment fees and outcome fees, and consider retaining attachment fees to protect the delivery of services. A large proportion of WP participants will reach the end of their two-year attachment period without finding sustained work, even if primes meet their contractual targets. Primes accepted that the proportion was likely to be between per cent of participants. The first cohorts of participants will come to the end of their attachment to the programme from June The Committee recommended that: The DWP should set out the support that would be in in place for participants who are unsuccessful in finding sustained work during their two years on the WP. All unsuccessful participants should have an end of WP assessment. Specialist support should be in place for those who have made little progress. Those who have made significant progress towards sustained employment should be permitted to voluntarily extend their attachment to the WP. The period in which providers are able to claim job outcome fees in relation to these participants should be extended. The DWP should consider the practicalities of assigning participants who have completed the programme without success, but are close to work, to one of the other primes covering the area. The Committee also expressed concern about a lack of timely and transparent official data. The publication of the first official figures was accompanied by the publication of unofficial figures by the Employment Related Services Association (ERSA). Although unofficial, these were frequently referred to by Ministers as an alternative to the official figures.
5 The role of JCP in the Work Programme The evidence from the official evaluation on local relationships between JCP and WP staff suggests a varied picture across JCP Districts. The Committee states that local JCP managers must take responsibility for ensuring good working relationships between WP and JCP staff. The WP, like earlier back-to-work programmes, can be accompanied by mandates and sanctions. Certain types of job-seekers can be mandated to undertake workrelated activities by DWP officials under the threat of withdrawal of benefits, or sanctions. Together, these two features are what is known as conditionality. The Committee reports that it is in favour of conditionality where it supports the policy intention of encouraging participants effective engagement with the WP. However, concerns are expressed over evidence of the inappropriate use, or threat, of benefit sanctions. The initial findings of the official evaluation suggest that the processes for the application of conditionality and sanctions do not work effectively. It is recommended that the DWP conduct a review of WP conditionality and sanctioning activity as a matter of urgency, and that it publishes its findings by the end of Employer engagement Considerable evidence was presented to the Committee of jobseekers being inadequately prepared to present themselves to employers. In the report, it is stated that providers should desist from simply deluging employers with a random selection of CVs and poorly prepared candidates. However, excellent examples exist of employers engaging effectively with WP providers, and it is recommended that DWP and the Employment Related Services Association (ERSA) encourage good practice. General awareness of the WP amongst employers appears to be low. It is recommended that the DWP work with the welfare-to-work industry to promote the WP to employers and that the DWP and ERSA produce a national action plan for engaging employers in the WP before the end of At a regional level, evidence suggests that collaborative approaches, where providers work together to create employer engagement strategies, are effective. At a local level, providers should make effective use of the experience and contacts of local stakeholders, for example by meeting regularly with local authorities and local business groups such as Chambers of Commerce, to identify employers recruitment needs and prepare WP participants for identified future vacancies. Jobseeker segmentation and the differential pricing model
6 The differential pricing model allows providers to claim higher payments for placing jobseekers facing the greatest challenges into sustained work. This is meant to stop providers focusing all their attention on the easiest cases. Jobseekers are allocated to one of nine payment groups, based largely on benefit type being claimed, with some sub-categories according to age, and a separate group for JSA claimants with the most significant barriers to work, such as serious drug problems and homelessness. There is also a separate category for prison leavers. The maximum value of payments on offer to providers for placing an ex-ib ESA claimant into sustained work ( 13,720) is just over three times the amount offered for a job outcome relating to a mainstream JSA claimant aged over 25 years ( 4,395). However, there is evidence that the WP is failing to reach jobseekers with the most severe barriers to employment. It is recommended that the DWP reviews JCP processes for identifying jobseekers with severe barriers to employment, such as homelessness and serious drug and alcohol problems, as a matter of urgency. It is recommended that where appropriate, these types of jobseekers are more consistently allocated to the JSA Early Access Group, where they will attract a higher level of funding than those in the mainstream JSA groups. The JSA Early Access group includes ex-offenders and offenders, disabled people, people with mild to moderate mental health issues, care-leavers, carers on JSA, ex-carers, homeless people, ex-armed Forces personnel, and people for whom drug or alcohol dependency presents a significant barrier to employment. Given that there was a consensus amongst witnesses that benefit type is a poor proxy for the level of jobseekers needs and the relative cost of supporting them into work, it is recommended that in future contracts the DWP should consider moving away from differential pricing based on benefit type and instead assess the merits of implementing a needs-based pricing model. It should also give consideration to funding models which reward providers for achieving steps along the way to employment by jobseekers with severe barriers to work and which recognise the need for greater up-front funding for some user groups. It is argued that it is not appropriate for the Government to retain the savings accrued as a result of the WP s early under-performance. It is recommended that the ring-fence around the WP budget is extended to encompass alternative provision. Part of the unexpected shortfall in WP spending should be utilised to extend the Work Choice programme (a voluntary programme of support for disabled people), to further increase resources for Access to Work (a scheme which subsidises work place adaptations for people with disabilities), and to extend the attachment period for participants who make real progress but complete two years on the Programme without achieving a sustained job outcome. Jobseekers with the most severe barriers to employment, it is claimed, are often not ready to engage effectively with the WP. The DWP should use part of the shortfall in WP spending to pilot additional pre-wp provision to prepare jobseekers, such as
7 homeless people and those with serious drug and alcohol problems, for effective engagement with the WP. In commissioning this provision, DWP should draw on the expertise of specialist providers, many of which have not been involved in WP delivery to the extent anticipated. It is recommended that this additional support is in place by early The Committee supports the black box approach to service delivery. A prescriptionfree approach, it is claimed, is preferable to a centrally-prescribed, process-driven system, which might stifle the potential for innovation and be an inefficient use of the DWP s resources. However, there is little evidence of substantive personalisation so far. Accuracy of the Work Capability Assessment The WP, it is pointed out, will support a far larger number of participants with disabilities and health conditions than any previous scheme. A large proportion of Employment Support Allowance (ESA) claimants will be expected to take steps towards returning to work and many will be referred to the WP on either a mandatory or voluntary basis, depending on the results of their Work Capability Assessment (WCA). In the 2011 Report, the Committee concluded that many claimants had received a poor service and an inaccurate assessment of their fitness for work through the WCA. In this inquiry, some providers reported recent improvements in the accuracy of the WCA, but a number reported that claimants who were clearly unfit for any type of work-related activity were being referred to the WP. In some reports, it was claimed that claimants with terminal cancer had been referred to the WP. It was confirmed by the Minister for Employment that there was currently no process by which providers can refer claimants back to JCP if they believe the claimant to be clearly unfit for work despite being assessed as being fit for work following a WCA. In this report, the Committee recommends that the DWP work with providers to agree a process by which participants whom providers believe are clearly unfit for work can be referred back to JCP. The process requires checks and balances to ensure that providers cannot simply refer back any participant whom they do not want to work with. A conclusion reached in the 2011 report on the Invalidity Benefit (IB) reassessment was that there should be a separate component of the WCA focusing on healthrelated or workplace interventions which might support claimants with health conditions and disabilities into work. Some of this was available in the Work Focused Health Related Assessment (WFHRA) which was a component of the WCA and which was suspended in July It is claimed that if the WFHRA had been in place when the WP was implemented, it could have provided a better assessment of benefit claimants readiness for work and might have prevented inappropriate
8 referrals. The DWP s decision to suspend the WFHR Assessment, and its recent decision to continue its suspension until at least April 2016, is described as regrettable. Assuring service standards for all participants With average caseloads of between 120 and 180, WP advisers are being forced to prioritise whom they support. It is recommended that the DWP and the welfare-towork industry devise ways of bringing WP caseloads down. The policy intention of randomly allocating WP participants to one of the two or three primes operating in each Contract Package Area (CPA) was to ensure that each prime operating in the same area receives an equal number and similar mix of participants, thereby allowing their performance to be compared. However, the Committee recommends that the DWP explores options for introducing an element of choice of prime for participants, particularly where it can be clearly demonstrated that specialist services are not offered by the prime to which they have been randomly referred but are available via one of the other primes operating in the same CPA. There appears to be insufficient focus on, or responsibility for, participants satisfaction with the support they receive. It is recommended that DWP require all primes to introduce standardised participant satisfaction surveys at appropriate intervals during each participant cohort s attachment to the programme. The black box needs to be balanced by clear and measurable minimum standards so that participants know what to expect and the minimum level of service they are entitled to. Currently, primes minimum service standards vary greatly in detail and measurability, and some are so vague that they permit providers to virtually ignore some participants if they choose. It is recommended that the DWP develop a core set of basic minimum standards applicable to all providers, and to which all WP participants are entitled. Steps taken by the welfare-to-work industry to professionalise its frontline workforce through accreditation and continuing professional development are welcomed. Availability of specialist support and regulating the market The reporting of official WP data at prime level only, it is argued, is inadequate and does not allow an assessment of the effectiveness of the whole market. In the absence of transparent official data on WP referrals below prime contractor level, the level of specialist subcontractors involvement in WP delivery cannot be assessed with any certainty. It is recommended that official WP data show both job outcomes and referrals at subcontractor as well as prime contractor level
9 It is noted once again that much of the evidence to this inquiry suggests that specialist providers are not involved in the WP to anywhere near the extent anticipated. There is also evidence that some voluntary sector providers are funding specialist WP provision from their own resources, including from charitable donations. This needs to be taken into account when calculating the overall cost of the WP, including in comparison to previous welfare-to-work schemes. It may also indicate that the specialist support some jobseekers need is not available within all supply chains to the degree envisaged. The DWP should also use part of the unspent WP budget to commission the specialist pre-wp provision for particularly disadvantaged jobseekers.. The Merlin Standard is meant to govern the relationship between primes and their supply chain partners, offering an independent standard against which supply-chain relationships are assessed. However, the Merlin standard s current remit does not allow it to address subcontractors grievances in relation to lack of referrals and the alleged imposition of unfair financial terms. A recommendation made in 2011 that Merlin s remit be extended to address such issues and that it should be given more teeth, with the power to impose financial penalties is repeated. Further, it is recommended that the Merlin standard s scope should also be extended to include an assessment of other stakeholders satisfaction with the behaviour of prime contractors, amongst which are included WP participants, local authorities and local employers. Comment The overall conclusion reached in this inquiry is that the WP has the potential to work well for relatively mainstream jobseekers who face less severe barriers to employment, even though it has fallen short in this respect of the targets set by the DWP. The Committee described the differential pricing model as a welcome evolution, but also noted the evidence that it is not having the intended impact. It could be the case that the level of premium attached to the very-hard-to-place is insufficient to overcome the risk to the primes of devoting additional resources to their needs. It is interesting that the job outcome standards set by the DWP only apply to three of the nine payment groups, two of which are mainstream JSA claimants, the other being new ESA claimants. The DWP considered that the degree of uncertainty attaching to the other groups made it too hard to devise targets. Perhaps for certain types of job-seeker, the level of financial incentives associated with employment outcomes can never be high enough for a marketised welfare -towork system. It is undoubtedly true that the WP was set up with great speed and that its organisation involved considerable disruption to pre-existing arrangements. Partly because of this, it is too early to give a definitive verdict, although a clearer picture will emerge with the publication of the next performance figures in late June. The impression that emerges, however, is that it does not (so far) represent a significant
10 improvement on earlier schemes. Further, although the accompanying rhetoric has placed some emphasis on the burden of risk being transferred from the public purse to the primes, in reality it is the people who need their services that bear the burden of risk, and their needs are in jeopardy if a prime cannot function effectively because of poor performance payments. People will very complex needs require a joined up approach delivered through local partnerships, but the primes performance in engaging local stakeholders, including local authorities, appears to be somewhat patchy. Local engagement should be a key criterion on which to assess the performance of primes, and developments in this respect should be closely monitored. If it is the case that poor outcome payments harm future performance, it will be local agencies that will have to step in. For more information about this, or any other LGiU member briefing, please contact Janet Sillett, Briefings Manager, on janet.sillett@lgiu.org.uk Related briefings Social Justice: transforming lives one year on Welfare Reform Update Youth Unemployment and the Youth Contract: Commons Work and Pensions Committee report
Employment Support Services Making the Work Programme work better
Employment Support Services Making the Work Programme work better Executive summary After its first two-year cycle of operation in a difficult labour market, the Work Programme is now showing signs of
More informationThe Work Programme. Prospectus November 2010
The Work Programme Prospectus November 2010 1 Delivering the Work Programme Introduction 1. The Work Programme is the centrepiece of the Government s plans to reform welfare-to-work provision in the UK,
More informationCan the Work Programme work for all user groups?
House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee Can the Work Programme work for all user groups? First Report of Session 2013 14 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional
More informationThe Working Environment in UK
Jobcentre Plus Offer - Customer Journey West Yorkshire Delivering Differently to meet the challenges of 2011 and beyond. West Yorkshire Customer Journey Doing what is right for the customer at each contact
More informationWork Programme: Building Best Practice Report. Recommendations to the Department for Work and Pensions
Work Programme: Building Best Practice Report Recommendations to the Department for Work and Pensions December 2014 Ministerial Foreword I would like to offer my thanks to Andrew Sells and the Work Programme:
More informationDrugs and Alcohol DWP Strategy
Drugs and Alcohol DWP Strategy Rachel Radice Social Justice May 2013 Department for Work and Pensions 1 Department for Work and Pensions Social Justice Progress Report Launched April 2013, updating on
More informationOpportunities for All. Supporting all young people to participate in post-16 learning, training or work
Opportunities for All Supporting all young people to participate in post-16 learning, training or work SUPPORTING IMPLEMENTATION Context The Scottish Government recognises the disproportionate impact that
More informationThe Jobcentre Plus offer for people with drug and/or alcohol dependency
Working with claimants with a drug and/or alcohol dependency Introduction At the heart of the Government s drug and alcohol strategy is a commitment to transform treatment services to offer recovery as
More informationThe Scottish Government response to the UK Government's Independent Review of Sickness Absence
Sickness Absence Review - Scottish Government Response The Scottish Government response to the UK Government's ndependent Review of Sickness Absence ~ The Scottish Government 1 Sickness Absence,"View -
More informationEvaluation of the Work Choice Specialist Disability Employment Programme. Technical appendices
Evaluation of the Work Choice Specialist Disability Employment Programme Technical appendices July 2013 Research Report No 846 Technical appendices A report of research carried out by Inclusion on behalf
More informationMarch 2013. 1. Executive Summary
Shaw Trust and Careers Development Group (CDG): Response to the Department for Work and Pensions extending labour market interventions to in-work. March 2013 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Shaw Trust and CDG
More informationChapter 20 Youth Contract - Wage Incentives Contents ( Work Choice Only )
Chapter 20 Youth Contract - Wage Incentives Contents ( Work Choice Only ) Please Note : This chapter is no longer applicable for work programme. High Level Must Do... 2 Agreeing a wage incentive opportunity...
More informationEquality Impact Assessment: Changes to National Insurance Contribution Conditions. For Employment and Support Allowance and Jobseeker s Allowance
Equality Impact Assessment: Changes to National Insurance Contribution Conditions For Employment and Support Allowance and Jobseeker s Allowance Equality impact assessment for changes to National Insurance
More informationAn independent review into the impact on employment outcomes of drug or alcohol addiction, and obesity. Call for evidence
An independent review into the impact on employment outcomes of drug or alcohol addiction, and obesity Call for evidence July 2015 Contents Foreword by Professor Dame Carol Black... 3 Introduction... 4
More informationDWP Commissioning Strategy 2013. Consultation
DWP Commissioning Strategy 2013 Consultation 31 st July 2013 Contents Introduction... 3 About this consultation... 3 How to respond to this consultation... 4 Commissioning Strategy overview... 7 The context
More informationMaking the Work Programme work for ESA claimants
Making the Work Programme work for ESA claimants Analysis of minimum performance levels and payment models A report as part of the Fit for Purpose project Timothy Riley Paul Bivand Tony Wilson April 2014
More informationBusiness Plan Executive Summary. Work Ready Individuals
Business Plan Executive Summary Work Ready Individuals NOTE The following business plan provides a whole-system approach which will support more individuals to make the transition from unemployment to
More informationCustomers experiences of the Youth Contract
Customers experiences of the Youth Contract February 2014 Research Report No 865 A report of research carried out by TNS-BMRB on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Crown copyright 2014. You
More informationAND JUSTICE FOR ALL? 33
Issues Issues provides briefings and reports on areas of policy, practice and the operating environment affecting the voluntary and community sector in Greater Manchester AND JUSTICE FOR ALL? 33 In response
More informationWork Programme Exit Report Guidance
Work Programme Exit Report Guidance Initial Introduction 1. This guidance explains the process to follow to obtain an exit report for a Work Programme Completer 2. Due to operational pressures around the
More informationImpact Assessment (IA)
Title: Welfare Reform and Work Bill: Impact Assessment for Converting Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) from a benefit into a Loan Lead department or agency: Department for Work and Pensions Other departments
More informationVocational Rehabilitation: what is it, who can deliver it, and who pays?
Vocational Rehabilitation: what is it, who can deliver it, and who pays? December 2008 Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health & College of Occupational Therapists Vocational Rehabilitation: what is it, who
More informationCrisis response to the consultation on the 2010 Drug Strategy September 2010
Crisis response to the consultation on the 2010 Drug Strategy September 2010 Introduction Crisis, the national charity for single homeless people, welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation
More informationBuilding Better Opportunities
Building Better Opportunities Project outline For use in England only Project title Project 15 of 19 - Employment support for refugees Central London Project reference number LEP area ESF Thematic Objective
More informationCustomer Journeys & Worklessness
Customer Journeys & Worklessness Key points Focusing on customer journeys can be key to improving outcomes in reducing worklessness, whether applied in looking at service design or in deeper analysis of
More informationWork Programme - A Review
Case study: The evolution of the Work Programme Statistics Adam Pearce January 2014 The Work Programme is quite complex Referral Attachment Outcome Payments Completion Assigned to one of 9 Payment Groups
More informationPayment by Results and the design and delivery of the Work Programme
Payment by Results and the design and delivery of the Work Programme CASE, LSE, 22 May 2013 Dan Finn University of Portsmouth and Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion (www.cesi.org.uk) Background to
More informationCrisis Response to the Department for Work and Pensions Consultation - Social Fund reform: debt, credit and lowincome
Crisis Response to the Department for Work and Pensions Consultation - Social Fund reform: debt, credit and lowincome households June 2010 Introduction Crisis, the national charity for single homeless
More informationInfo sheet : Considering labour standards in the procurement process
Info sheet : Considering labour standards in the procurement process In line with the EU procurement rules and the Government s value for money principle, contracting authorities can take steps to consider
More informationFAMILIES AND SOCIAL CARE SPECIALIST CHILDREN S SERVICES GUIDE TO TAX AND BENEFITS WHEN YOU FOSTER A CHILD
Version 1.0 FAMILIES AND SOCIAL CARE SPECIALIST CHILDREN S SERVICES GUIDE TO TAX AND BENEFITS WHEN YOU FOSTER A CHILD Document Owner: Performance and QA Manager (CiC) Authorised: February 2013 Review Date:
More informationAnalysis of English language employment support provision in London for JSA and ESA WRAG customers
Analysis of English language employment support provision in London for JSA and ESA WRAG customers Sarah Foster Dr Pippa Lane March 2012 Inclusion Third Floor 89 Albert Embankment London SE1 7TP Tel: 020
More informationCreative Employment Programme FAQs
Creative Employment Programme FAQs 1. Creative Employment Programme What is the Creative Employment Programme? How did Creative & Cultural Skills become the National Provider for the Creative Employment
More informationEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE UNIVERSAL CREDIT (CONSEQUENTIAL, SUPPLEMENTARY, INCIDENTAL AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) REGULATIONS 2013. 2013 No.
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE UNIVERSAL CREDIT (CONSEQUENTIAL, SUPPLEMENTARY, INCIDENTAL AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) REGULATIONS 2013 2013 No. 630 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by
More informationEmployment opportunities for older people
Employment opportunities for older people Response to the Enterprise and Business Committee Contact: Aaron Hill Policy & Public Affairs Officer, NIACE Cymru Tel: +44 (0)29 20370900 Email: aaron.hill@niace.org.uk
More informationSummary of the revised SEND Code of Practice: 0-25 years April 2014 Introduction
Summary of the revised SEND Code of Practice: 0-25 years April 2014 Introduction The Code of Practice is statutory guidance on duties, policies and procedures relating to Part 3 of the Children and Families
More informationPolicy reference 200900399 Policy product type LGiU/csn essential policy briefing Published date 08/10/2009. This covers England.
Page 1 of 5 Training of children and families social workers Policy reference 200900399 Policy product type LGiU/csn essential policy briefing Published date 08/10/2009 Author Laura Corben This covers
More informationBuilding Better Opportunities
Building Better Opportunities Project outline For use in England only Project title Project reference number LEP area ESF Thematic Objective ESF Investment Priority Project 3 of 4 - Support for Young People
More informationBOROUGH BRIEFING THE LONDON BRIEFING
BRIEFING BOROUGHS London s 32 boroughs, together with the City of London, provide their residents with the majority of services including schools, social care, public health, highways, environmental health
More informationIndependent review into the impact on employment outcomes of drug or alcohol addiction, and obesity
Independent review into the impact on employment outcomes of drug or alcohol addiction, and obesity St Mungo s Broadway response to the call for evidence September 2015 About St Mungo s Broadway Our vision
More informationTime limiting contributory Employment and Support Allowance to one year for those in the work-related activity group
Time limiting contributory Employment and Support Allowance to one year for those in the work-related activity group Equality impact assessment October 2011 Equality impact assessment for time limiting
More informationINTRODUCTION. The Merlin Principles. The Elements of each Principle
0 INTRODUCTION The development of the Merlin Standard has been progressed as a joint exercise between the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and its providers operating in the Welfare to Work (W2W)
More informationPerformance Evaluation Report 2013 14. The City of Cardiff Council Social Services
Performance Evaluation Report 2013 14 The City of Cardiff Council Social Services October 2014 This report sets out the key areas of progress and areas for improvement in The City of Cardiff Council Social
More informationAberdeen City Council
Aberdeen City Council Audit of housing benefit Risk assessment report Prepared for Aberdeen City Council July 2015 Audit Scotland is a statutory body set up in April 2000 under the Public Finance and Accountability
More informationDWP: Evaluation of Removal of the Spare Room Subsidy (Bedroom Tax)
Housing Strategy and Development Briefing Note 14/10 DWP: Evaluation of Removal of the Spare Room Subsidy (Bedroom Tax) October 2014 Introduction Welcome to a series of regular briefings prepared by the
More informationAddiction and Obesity Independent Review Team Department for Work and Pensions Ground Floor Caxton House Tothill Street London SW1H 9NA
Addiction and Obesity Independent Review Team Department for Work and Pensions Ground Floor Caxton House Tothill Street London SW1H 9NA 11 September 2015 Dear Sir or Madam, YMCA England response to the
More informationSelf Assessment STANDARDS
Self Assessment STANDARDS www.wellbeingcharter.org.uk This pack contains an overview of the Workplace Wellbeing Charter, including the Charter Framework, the Assessment Standards and other useful information.
More informationAPPENDIX A Clackmannanshire Council. Audit of housing and council tax benefit. Risk assessment report
APPENDIX A Clackmannanshire Council Audit of housing and council tax benefit Risk assessment report Prepared for Clackmannanshire Council November 2012 19 Audit Scotland is a statutory body set up in April
More informationFulfilling Potential? ESA and the fate of the Work-Related Activity Group
Fulfilling Potential? ESA and the fate of the Work-Related Activity Group Catherine Hale Supported by for better mental health 2 ESA and the fate of the Work-Related Activity Group Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...
More informationSummary: Analysis & Evidence Policy Option 1 Description: Offender Rehabilitation Bill FULL ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT
Title: Offender Rehabilitation Bill Impact Assessment IA : Lead department or agency: Ministry of Justice Other departments or agencies: NOMS Summary: Intervention and Options Impact Assessment (IA) Date:
More informationGender Recognition Guidance Get Britain Working Get Britain Working Measures Group Session Guidance
ACME Guidance ADAPT Guidance Access to Work Action Plans Additional Support for Contracted Provision Adviser Development Forums Agents Appointees Attorneys and Deputies Guide (AAADG) Allowance Payments
More informationMinistry of Justice (2013), Pages 7-8 of Transforming Rehabilitation. A revolution in the way we manage offenders.
Shaw Trust and Careers Development Group (CDG): Response to the Ministry of Justice s Transforming Rehabilitation- A revolution in the way we manage offenders Consultation February 2013 1. Executive Summary
More informationHow to make a claim for benefits
GUIDE TO BENEFITS How to make a claim for benefits This is a basic guide to benefit entitlements; please ensure that you discuss with your Resettlement Officer before you make a claim for benefits. You
More informationThe cost effectiveness of Action for Children s Intensive Family Support Services. Final Report
The cost effectiveness of Action for Children s Intensive Family Support Services Final Report June 2013 Samantha McDermid and Lisa Holmes Centre for Child and Family Research, Loughborough University
More informationRESPONSE TO. Legal Services Board: Approaches to Quality
RESPONSE TO Legal Services Board: Approaches to Quality May 2012 1 Action against Medical Accidents Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA) was established in 1982. It is the leading UK Charity specialising
More informationDebt management businesses
Debt management businesses Standard Note: SN/HA/6275 Last updated: 27 March 2012 Author: Lorraine Conway Section Home Affairs Section People who are in severe financial difficulties may seek advice from
More informationCriminal justice policy and the voluntary sector
Criminal justice policy and the voluntary sector Criminal justice policy and the voluntary sector Involving the voluntary sector 5 Reducing re-offending 5 Listening and responding to people with lived
More informationTransforming Rehabilitation A Strategy for Reform. Response to Consultation CP(R)16/2013
Transforming Rehabilitation A Strategy for Reform Response to Consultation CP(R)16/2013 May 2013 Presented to Parliament by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice by Command of Her Majesty
More informationREHABILITATION PROGRAMME MARKET ENGAGEMENT, MAY 2013. Payment Mechanism Straw Man
REHABILITATION PROGRAMME MARKET ENGAGEMENT, MAY 2013 Mechanism Straw Man INTRODUCTION This document sets out our Straw Man payment mechanism proposal for how we will pay for the parts of the Rehabilitation
More informationPUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMME GUIDANCE DRAFT SCOPE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMME GUIDANCE DRAFT SCOPE 1 Guidance title Guidance for primary care services and employers on the management of long-term sickness
More informationEmployment Law Guide
Employment Law Guide Settlement Agreements (Formally known as Compromise Agreements) See the separate guide. Unfair Dismissal Length of employment Employees can only bring a claim for ordinary unfair dismissal
More informationBusiness Plan for Strategic Human Resources - March 2012 to 30 September 2013
Business Plan for Strategic Human Resources - March 2012 to 30 September 2013 1. Introduction 1.1 The Service s key responsibilities are to: 1.2 Context Design & deliver people and organisational development
More informationStatistics on individuals in drug or alcohol treatment in receipt of working-age benefits. Figures for 2011/12, England
Statistics on individuals in drug or alcohol treatment in receipt of working-age benefits Figures for 2011/12, England 31 st July 2015 Contents Overview... 3 Results Summary... 3 Methodology... 4 Data
More informationOpening up work for all The role of assessment in the Work Programme
Opening up work for all The role of assessment in the Work Programme Nick Coleman With Fran Parry June 2011 For more information contact: Peter Deaves Head of Policy Inclusion Third Floor 89 Albert Embankment
More informationNational Disability Employment Framework Issues Paper. Key Employment (DES, Head Office Coffs Harbour, NSW) Response
National Disability Employment Framework Issues Paper Key Employment (DES, Head Office Coffs Harbour, NSW) Response The philosophy that underpins the suggested changes to the Disability Employment Services
More informationPayment by Results: Learning from the Literature
Payment by Results: Learning from the Literature A review prepared for the National Audit Office The views expressed in this paper are not necessarily those of the National Audit Office 27 February 2015
More informationThe NHS Foundation Trust Code of Governance
The NHS Foundation Trust Code of Governance www.monitor-nhsft.gov.uk The NHS Foundation Trust Code of Governance 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Why is there a code of governance for NHS foundation trusts?
More informationMinistry of Social Development: Changes to the case management of sickness and invalids beneficiaries
Ministry of Social Development: Changes to the case management of sickness and invalids beneficiaries This is the report of a performance audit we carried out under section 16 of the Public Audit Act 2001
More informationCare Providers Protecting your organisation, supporting its success. Risk Management Insurance Employee Benefits Investment Management
Care Providers Protecting your organisation, supporting its success Risk Management Insurance Employee Benefits Investment Management Care providers are there to help those in need. But who helps the care
More informationThe Rapid Response Service in the UK. Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Introduction
The Rapid Response Service in the UK Executive Summary Introduction The Peer Review Meeting on the Rapid Response Service (RRS) in the UK was held in Newcastle on 14-15 April 2003, and hosted by Jobcentre
More informationWorking towards recovery
Bringing evidence and analysis together to inform UK drug policy Working towards recovery Getting problem drug users into jobs Summary This is a summary of the main findings from a review looking at getting
More informationAssessment and recommendations
ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Assessment and recommendations Mental ill-health represents a high cost for the Swiss economy, accounting for roughly 3.2% of GDP through lost productivity of workers
More informationThe Government's Drug Strategy
Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 297 SesSIon 2009 2010 march 2010 Tackling problem drug use Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Tackling problem drug use HC 297 Session 2009-2010
More informationGuidance on the template contract for social impact bonds and payment by results
Guidance on the template contract for social impact bonds and payment by results Introduction These guidance notes have been prepared to assist users of the Cabinet Office template contract. The guidance
More informationHigh Level Must Dos... 1. Mandating participants to undertake activity that attracts a Low Level sanction... 2
Chapter 3a Mandation Contents High Level Must Dos... 1 Mandating participants to undertake activity that attracts a Low Level sanction... 2 Mandating JSA participants to undertake activity that attracts
More informationCompensation Recovery Unit. Z2 - Mandatory reconsideration and appeal guide for recovery of benefits and/or lump sum payments
Compensation Recovery Unit Z2 - Mandatory reconsideration and appeal guide for recovery of benefits and/or lump sum payments October 2013 1 Contents Compensation recovery scheme... 3 If you want the Compensation
More informationEAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL CABINET: WEDNESDAY 13 MARCH 2013 WELFARE REFORM UPDATE ON IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS
EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL CABINET: WEDNESDAY 13 MARCH 2013 WELFARE REFORM UPDATE ON IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS Report by the Executive Director of Finance and Corporate Support 1. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 1.1
More informationConsideration of equalities impacts
Consideration of equalities impacts Rehabilitation Programme November 2013 Page 2 of 40 BILLS (13-14) 093A Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 TRANSFORMING REHABILITATION REFORM PROGRAMME... 3 GATHERING EVIDENCE
More informationABA COMMISSION ON EFFECTIVE CRIMINAL SANCTIONS
ABA COMMISSION ON EFFECTIVE CRIMINAL SANCTIONS The ABA Commission on Effective Criminal Sanctions has developed a series of policy recommendations that it anticipates will provide the basis for a broad
More informationConsumer Panel response to DG Markt consultation document: Financial inclusion: ensuring access to a basic bank account
Consumer Panel response to DG Markt consultation document: Financial inclusion: ensuring access to a basic bank account The Financial Services Consumer Panel was established under the Financial Services
More informationThe South London Jobcentre Plus Youth Contract & GBW Offer
The South London Jobcentre Plus Youth Contract & GBW Offer Supporting our young JSA customers into work Emma Jarnell- Partnership Manager 1 Department for Work and Pensions The Headlines An extra 250,000
More informationUniversal Credit. Support available for claimants with drug &/or alcohol dependency in Scotland. Supplementary information for treatment providers
Universal Credit Support available for claimants with drug &/or alcohol dependency in Scotland Supplementary information for treatment providers Using this document This presentation is designed to be
More informationReport. by the Comptroller and Auditor General. Department for Work & Pensions. The Work Programme
Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Department for Work & Pensions The Work Programme HC 266 SESSION 2014-15 2 JULY 2014 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective
More informationDraft Special Educational Needs (SEN) Code of Practice: for 0 to 25 years
Draft Special Educational Needs (SEN) Code of Practice: for 0 to 25 years Statutory guidance for organisations who work with and support children and young people with SEN October 2013 Contents 1 Introduction
More informationCONTENTS. Introducing the Charter page 2. Charter in Action page 3. Key Partners page 3. Challenge to Employers page 4. Voluntary Commitments page 4
CONTENTS Introducing the Charter page 2 Charter in Action page 3 Key Partners page 3 Challenge to Employers page 4 Voluntary Commitments page 4 Benefits to Employers page 5 Management of the Charter page
More informationHousing Investment: Part 1
June 2010 Research: briefing Housing Investment: Part 1 The first of a series of research papers assessing the impacts of cutting capital investment in housing Shelter is a charity that works to alleviate
More informationHow To Work For The Dwp
The Work Programme Invitation to Tender Specification and Supporting Information Version 5.0 WP Specification - 1 CONTENTS 1. Overview 2. The Service Requirement 3. The Payment Model, Performance and Market
More information1 DWP Operations Business Plan 2013/14. DWP Operations Business Plan 2013/14
1 DWP Operations Business Plan 2013/14 DWP Operations Business Plan 2013/14 June 2013 2 DWP Operations Business Plan 2013/14 Contents Operations Director General Foreword 3 Our priorities 4 Our story so
More informationRe: Productivity Commission Inquiry into the Economic Implications of an Ageing Australia
11 February 2005 Chair Productivity Commission Economic Implications of an Ageing Australia PO Box 80 Belconnen ACT 2616 Email: ageing@pc.gov.au Re: Productivity Commission Inquiry into the Economic Implications
More informationResponse to Public Health England Centres consultation
Response to Public Health England Centres consultation The British Dental Association (BDA) is the professional association and trade union for dentists practising in the UK. BDA members are engaged in
More informationthe independent broker role and training requirements
new types of worker project January 2009 the independent broker role and training requirements a summary report This is a summary of the main findings and recommendations from a project carried out by
More informationSRA Compensation Arrangements Review Consultation: The introduction of an eligibility criteria
SRA Compensation Arrangements Review Consultation: The introduction of an eligibility criteria May 2014 SRA Compensation Arrangements Review Consultation - who should be eligible to benefit from the SRA'
More informationPES Network contribution to the consultation regarding a COM proposal for a Council Recommendation on Job Integration for the Long-term Unemployed
PES Network contribution to the consultation regarding a COM proposal for a Council Recommendation on Job Integration for the Long-term Unemployed 1 Background The PES network Board agreed at its December
More informationGIVE IT UP FOR BABY SMOKING CESSATION INTERVENTION FOR PREGNANT WOMEN IN DUNDEE, SCOTLAND
GIVE IT UP FOR BABY SMOKING CESSATION INTERVENTION FOR PREGNANT WOMEN IN DUNDEE, SCOTLAND Introduction Give it up for Baby (GIUFB) involves providing pregnant mothers with 12.50 worth of grocery vouchers
More informationSimon Community Northern Ireland welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Alcohol and Drug Commissioning Framework for Northern Ireland 2013-2016
Simon Community Northern Ireland welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Alcohol and Drug Commissioning Framework for Northern Ireland 2013-2016 About the Simon Community Simon Community Northern Ireland
More informationPCA submission to the Review of Veterans within the Criminal Justice System
PCA submission to the Review of Veterans within the Criminal Justice System This submission has been prepared by the Probation Chiefs Association (PCA), representing the senior management of probation
More informationDWP SPECIFIC PROVIDER GUIDANCE
1 DWP SPECIFIC PROVIDER GUIDANCE Part I WORK CHOICE Contents Section Page Section 1 Work Choice Introduction and Overview 3 Section 2 Referral Sources and Procedures 8 Section 3 The Initial Provider Interview
More informationRisks to customers from performance management at firms
Guidance consultation 15/1 Risks to customers from performance management at firms Thematic review and guidance for firms March 2015 Contents 1 Approach and findings 2 2 Guidance to firms 8 3 Next steps
More informationSeeing double: meeting the challenge of dual diagnosis. Introduction
briefing september 2009 ISSUE 189 Seeing double: meeting the challenge of dual diagnosis Key points Dual diagnosis affects a third of mental health service users, half of substance misuse service users
More informationHuman Resources Report 2014 and People Strategy
24 February 2015 Council 5 To consider Human Resources Report 2014 and People Strategy Issue 1 The annual report on Human Resources issues and a proposed People Strategy. Recommendations 2 Council is asked
More informationAUSTRALIAN GREENS DISSENTING REPORT
AUSTRALIAN GREENS DISSENTING REPORT Introduction 1.1 This program is an ill-conceived response to the enormous environmental damage our community faces and does not adequately address the most important
More information