Humanitarian Performance Monitoring

Transcription

1 Humanitarian Performance Monitoring

2 Content What Humanitarian Performance Monitoring can do for you Key elements of the HPM Approach Investment Required / Support Mechanisms Monitoring of Results for Equity System (MoRES) and HPM

3 What Humanitarian Performance Monitoring can do for you? 1. Does response have adequate resources? e.g. tracking % funding by sector, % staffing filled, % supplies from allocation to delivery Informs management of HQ-RO support to CO 2. Are we making progress/ enough progress? e.g. tracking children <5 with SAM enrolled in TFPs # and estimated coverage as % of target by UNICEF / by Cluster Decisions to allocate more resources -- advocacy, $, human

4 What Humanitarian Performance Monitoring can do for you? 3. Is the quality of the response as expected? e.g. % sites visited where issues identified related to use of supplies; services functioning; equity of access. Feedback to specific site/partners; changes to strategy 4. Are we meeting Cluster Lead Agency accountabilities? e.g. tracking key milestones--tors, IM systems, strategy, technical standards Increase in management resources, advocacy

5 Key Components of Humanitarian Performance Monitoring SitRep feeds into CO management team review SitRep Few key progamme indicators Few key operations indicators Cluster milestones High frequency coverage estimates -- partner reporting 2-3 key programme indicators per sector Field monitoring to check quality Implementation bottlenecks Equity Do no harm Engagement local capacities Cluster coordination milestone monitoring UNICEF CLA accountabilities VISION Supply, Human Resources & Funding Data

6 Key Elements for Humanitarian Performance Monitoring HCT, Cluster Management Overview Cluster Performance Monitoring Outcome surveys Partner reporting Field monitoring Cluster coordination Coverage & Equity High frequency partner reporting Field monitoring to check quality Cluster coordination milestone monitoring VISION

7 Investment Required -- CO Depends on adaptations to context Requires senior managers CO, RO, HQ --using performance data Requires increased investment in field monitoring ($, people) Requires investment in advocacy and information management for partner reporting Requires lead time for set up Data lags at least 1 month after PCA agreements Field Monitoring - set up time varies w options

8 Investment Required -- RO/HQ Support Guidance and Toolkit Continued engagement IA processes Roster internal/external HPM and IM surge Technical and capacity building support to COs Preparedness, protracted humanitarian situations Quality assurance of CO HPM and feedback Global/regional level analysis of HPM data

9 Humanitarian Performance Monitoring

10 Monitoring of Results for Equity System (MoRES) adapted in Emergencies Level 1 Needs assessment draws on prior Situation Analysis, and reassesses same key determinants: enabling environment; services and support; access and use of services Level 2 High frequency internal SitReps cover monitoring of availability and use of key UNICEF resources (narrative report and VISION management reports on resources for selected IRs) Level 3 In major emergencies (e.g. Appeals > $15 million), country offices prioritize/redirect resources to scale up monitoring Monitoring aligns to new priority results in line with CCCs Indicators and methods systematically include: Key output indicators for coverage estimates (supply) through partners Quality issues (access, use) through field monitoring Cluster process milestones (coordination) through selfreporting Monitoring feeds higher frequency management review

11 Monitoring of Results for Equity System (MoRES) adapted in High Emergency-Risk Contexts Level 1 Emergency-risk informed analysis entails: Examining impact of emergency threats and likely humanitarian consequences on equity gaps; Which can lead to identification/prioritization of different key result areas; geographic focus; or bottlenecks; And to equity-focused programming with specific risk prevention/reduction/mitigation focus. Level 2 Level 3 Choice of indicators and data collection methods influenced by potential use in monitoring humanitarian response Level 4

12