EXAMPLES OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION

Transcription

1 United Nations Children s Fund Regional Office for South Asia EXAMPLES OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION INDIA For every child Health, Education, Equality, Protection ADVANCE HUMANITY

2 EXAMPLES OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION INDIA

3 The United Nations Children s Fund (UNICEF) Regional Office for South Asia, 2003 For further information, please contact: UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia P.O. Box 5815, Lekhnath Marg Kathmandu, Nepal rosa@unicef.org

4 FOREWORD The obstacles to a good education faced by millions of children in South Asia are daunting enough. For the 10% of the region s young people who are estimated to have some kind of disability, the barriers are compounded. The UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia has looked at examples in India, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka of how such children are given schooling, and whether this is the type of education they have the right to expect. The result is a very mixed bag indeed. Overall it is clear that large numbers of children who struggle daily with additional hardships are not getting the chance to improve their lives through education. This means, of course, they are caught in a spiral of low expectation, low esteem and low income. The minority of children with disability that do get places are often not sitting in the same classroom as other boys and girls because of a sense that they need to be separated and treated differently. Globally it is estimated that 70% of children with disabilities, including those with mild mental retardation, can attend regular schools provided the environment is designed to be accessible and the institution is willing to accommodate them. UNICEF believes that the goal should be to enable all children to have full participation in the development of their community. Meeting this goal of inclusion requires all structures and community-based services to be accessible to all members of the community without discrimination. By producing a snapshot on the activities happening in five South Asian countries UNICEF Regional Office hopes to fill in an information gap on children with disabilities while examining misconceptions, prejudices and discriminatory practices. The documents on each of the five countries examine initiatives being undertaken by governments, NGOs, INGOs, and UN agencies. Crucially they highlight good practices that have proved effective in addressing concerns and constraints. It is hoped these documents will be a starting point for policies and practices that get many more children with disabilities into school. As we all work to fulfill the Millennium Development Goal of Education for All I would urge that the exclusion of the challenged child be specifically addressed with initiatives aimed at ending prejudice and isolation. UNICEF ROSA will work with experts to pull together the ideas captured in the five documents with the hope that this process will facilitate momentum toward the full inclusion of every child in all that their community has to offer. Dr Sadig Rasheed UNICEF Regional Director for South Asia

5 CONTENTS ACRONYMS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i ii INTRODUCTION 1 OBJECTIVES 3 METHODOLOGY 4 MAGNITUDE OF DISABILITY 5 POLICIES CONCERNING EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES 7 RESOURCE ALLOCATION FOR EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES 11 NATIONAL-LEVEL PRACTICES ON EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES 13 Early childhood care and education 13 Project for Integrated Education Development (PIED) and Integrated Education for the Disabled Children (IEDC) 13 District Primary Education Project (DPEP) 15 District Rehabilitation Centres and National Programme for Rehabilitation for Persons with Disability (NPRPD) 15 UN support to primary education: Community School Programme 16 Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) (Movement to Educate All) 16 STATUS ON DISABILITIES AND SUPPORTIVE INSTITUTIONS 18 ROLE OF NGOS 20 POLICY DIRECTIONS FOR THE FUTURE 21

6 EXAMPLES OF WORKING MODELS 22 Sikshit Yuva Sewa Samiti (SYSS), Basti, Uttar Pradesh 22 Sir Shapurji Billimoria Foundation, Mumbai, Maharashtra 27 Joyful Inclusion Pack, CBR Network, Bangalore, Karnataka 29 Udisha-Portage Project, Bangalore, Karnataka 33 Inclusive practices in Kerala and Tamil Nadu 37 KEY OBSERVATIONS 39 RECOMMENDATIONS 40 REFERENCES 42

7 ACRONYMS CBR Network DPEP ECCE ESCAP ICDS IEDC ILO INGO NCERT NGO NPE PIED SSA SYSS UEE UN UNICEF UNDP UNFPA UNESCO Community Based Rehabilitation Network District Primary Education Programme early childhood care and education Economic and Social Commission for the Asia Pacific Integrated Child Development Scheme Integrated Education for Disabled Children International Labour Organization international non-governmental organization National Council of Educational Research and Training non-governmental organization National Policy on Education Project for Integrated Education Development Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Sikshit Yuva Sewa Samiti universalization of elementary education United Nations United Nations Children's Fund United Nations Development Programme United Nations Fund for Population Activities United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization i

8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UNICEF s Report on the Status of Disability in India 2000 states that there are around 30 million children in India suffering from some form of disability. The Sixth All-India Educational Survey (NCERT, 1998) reports that of India s 200 million school-aged children (6 14 years), 20 million require special needs education. While the national average for gross enrolment in school is over 90 per cent, less than five per cent of children with disabilities are in school. Government and NGOs are initiating measures to review and plan appropriate strategies for special needs and inclusive education. These measures include evolving policy guidelines, analysing practices, developing teacher training programmes, and creating resource persons and special teachers by establishing linkages to complement each other. In the past few years, focus on children with disabilities has resulted in greater awareness and increased sensitivity towards these children. The launch of the District Primary Education Programme (DPEP) in 1994 provided further impetus to existing efforts. The Equal Opportunities and Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 was comprehensive breakthrough legislation that provided for education and economic rehabilitation of people with disabilities. It states that free education for children with disabilities up to the age of 18 years must be provided in an appropriate environment. The government has recently launched the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA). This proposes to implement universalization of elementary education (UEE) in a mission mode with a focus on providing quality elementary education to all children in the age group 6 14 years. Inclusive education is an integral component of SSA, and promises to make education for all a reality by Programmes launched in the recent past have been able to make only a limited impact in terms of increasing the participation of children with disabilities in formal education. This situation needs to change in the near future, and a focused effort is required. Keeping in mind the large number of children whose needs must be addressed and the limited resources available, the best option is to promote inclusive education. However, the question is how to demystify the concept and make it acceptable in a country as large and diverse as India, with its multiple tracks offering inequitable schooling opportunities to different groups? There is a need to develop a long-term strategy in which every step taken adds to the sound base for inclusive education. This can be facilitated by developing a better understanding of the present status of education of children with disabilities, and how inclusive practices can be promoted. This study analyses the global polices in education of children with disabilities and how India s policies and programme align with them. Good practices are documented for inclusive schooling, community-based programmes that promote inclusion, and teacher development initiatives that assist primary school teachers in the classroom to identify, assess and support the needs of children with disabilities. Early childhood development interventions focusing on early detection and prevention of disabilities and preparation of children to enter mainstream schools have also been examined. ii

9 The practices were drawn from five states (Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Kerala) based on information available from officials and professionals working for the education of children with disabilities. The school practices were documented after discussions with teachers, parents, children with disabilities and their peer group. The concerns of NGOs, bureaucrats and professionals from apex institutions for teacher training were accounted for by carrying out interviews. Based on documentation, field observations and data analysis, this study identifies positive initiatives taken up by the government and NGOs, and suggests further measures that need to be taken to achieve the goal of UEE for all children including those with disabilities. In India, inclusive education is still developing and presently it is not easy to identify good practices. In this study, good practices were analysed by using three dimensions: creating inclusive culture; producing inclusive polices; and evolving inclusive practices (Booth et al., 2001). Inclusive culture was analysed by studying the knowledge, skills and attitudes of teachers, parents and children in accepting children with disabilities. Enrolment policies of the government were examined to identify inclusive policies. Inclusive practices included teacher training programmes showing awareness, and providing guidance in modification of materials, methodology, content and evaluation for the benefit of all children. The good practices studied showed that these traits were not add-ons but an integral part of the culture. Such practices were possible only when they included appropriate teacher training, provided accessible schools, child-friendly curricula, appropriate teaching methodologies and evaluation systems, and developed partnerships with families and communities. It was hard to find all these features in any single project. The practices identified by this study, therefore, have the potential to become a package of good practices. The Sikshit Yuva Sewa Samiti (SYSS), an NGO in a partnership with the government, participates in the implementation of the Integrated Education for Disabled Children (IEDC) and DPEP projects (funded by the government), and strengthens the programme through community-based intervention initiatives. While the projects provide physical infrastructure for schools, this NGO, through trained personnel, ensures accessibility for and enrolment of children with disabilities in community schools after identification by trained anganwadi (grassroots) workers. It also provides resource teachers as a support system to general teachers, and a back-up team of physiotherapists and occupational therapists at the district level. The NGO provides awareness and orientation training to general teachers, develops materials, and supports general teachers in modification of curricula to facilitate learning by children with disabilities. The effort has created an inclusive culture where parents, the community, peer groups, teachers, and school authorities and education officers are all involved in educating children with disabilities. Sir Shapurji Billimoria Foundation, a teacher development initiative, provides in-service training to ordinary teachers to meet the needs of children with disabilities. Weekend training modules are used since teachers cannot be away from school for long periods. In addition, there is a three-year pre-service training programme (B.A. in integrated education) for school leavers. The training programme ensures that teachers are able to facilitate the learning of all children in the classroom. Practical experience, exposure to participatory learning methodology, and the ability to teach at the elementary level in a multiple setting are emphasized together with a focus on human development. iii

10 The Joyful Inclusion Training Programme is being conducted by the CBR Network, an NGO involved in the education and rehabilitation of children with special needs. Teachers in rural government schools utilize a training pack that includes a curriculum-based criterion-referenced checklist prepared by the NGO. The training manuals, developed for training master trainers as well as general teachers, have proved useful. Teachers have been trained in the methodology developed in the Joyful Inclusion Package for teaching all children including those with disabilities. Udisha Portage Project is an early childhood development initiative for children of 0 6 years of age. In this programme, a modified version of the Portage pack is used as a home-visiting guide for early childhood development that meets the socio-cultural needs of Indian people. In the training programme, a team at the district level (one government representative and one NGO representative) is trained on the principles of the Portage pack. This district team then trains integrated child development supervisors who in turn train anganwadi workers. These workers use their skills to ensure the holistic development of all children. The Udisha Portage Project has trained a large number of anganwadi workers and supervisors who help mothers to understand the underlying principles of child development, and assist children with developmental delays by using resources available in the family and community. The project succeeds in reaching unreached children with disabilities, especially in rural and urban impoverished areas. This study also brings out good practices that were observed in the southern states of Kerala and Tamil Nadu. These are considered to be good practices because of their wide coverage especially in rural and hilly areas (especially in Kerala), and their positive impact. With a few modifications, these models could be successfully replicated. Based on analysis of the state of special and inclusive education and the documentation of inclusive model practices, the following key observations are made. l Central and state governments have taken a number of initiatives to improve the enrolment, retention and achievement of children with disabilities. There is a need to establish interlinks and collaborations among various organizations to prevent overlapping, duplication and contradictions in programme implementation. l Most services for children with disabilities are concentrated in big cities or close to district headquarters. The majority of children with disabilities who live in rural areas do not benefit from these services. l There is an absence of consistent data on the magnitude and educational status of children with disabilities, and the disparities between regions and types of disability. This makes it difficult to understand the nature of the problem, and to make realistic interventions. l Special schools and integrated educational practices for children with disabilities have developed over the years. Inclusive educational has gained momentum over the last decade. l Community involvement and partnerships between government agencies and NGOs have been instrumental in promoting inclusive education. l Many schools have a large number of children in each classroom and few teachers. As a consequence of this, many teachers are reluctant to work with children with disabilities. They consider it an additional workload. iv

11 l Training for sensitization towards disability and inclusion issues, and how to converge efforts for effective implementation of programmes, are important concerns. l Different disabilities require different supports. The number of skilled and trained personnel for supporting inclusive practices is not adequate to meet the needs of different types of disability. l The curriculum lacks the required flexibility to cater to the needs of children with disabilities. There are limited developmentally appropriate teaching learning materials for children both with and without disabilities. The teaching learning process addresses the individual learning needs of children in a limited way. l Families do not have enough information about their child s particular disability, its effects and its impact on their child s capacity. This often leads to a sense of hopelessness. Early identification and intervention initiatives sensitize parents and community members about the education of children with disabilities. Bearing in mind this scenario, the following recommendations need to be considered in order to move towards education of children with disabilities in inclusive settings. l The attitude that inclusive education is not an alternative but an inevitability, if the dream of providing basic education to all children is to ever become a reality needs to be cultivated among all concerned professionals, grassroots workers, teachers and community members, especially in rural and remote areas. l Links and bridges need to be built between special schools and inclusive education practices. Linkages also need to be established between community-based rehabilitation programmes and inclusive education. l Public policies, supportive legislation and budgetary allocations should not be based on incidence, but on prevalence of special education needs, and take into consideration the backlog created as a result of decades of neglect. l The existing dual ministry responsibilities should be changed. Education of children with disabilities should be the responsibility of the Department of Education. The Ministry of Welfare should confine itself to support activities only. l Inclusion without adequate preparation of general schools will not yield satisfactory results. It is essential that issues related to infrastructural facilities, curriculum modification and educational materials should be addressed. l Regular evaluation should be based on performance indicators specified in the implementation programme, and accountability for effective implementation at all levels should be ensured. l There should be emphasis on bottom-up, school-based interventions as part of regular education programmes following inclusive strategies. The programme should be based on stakeholder participation, community mobilization, and mobilization of NGO, private and government resources. v

12 l The training of general teachers at pre-service and in-service levels should address the issue of education of children with disabilities, so that teachers are better equipped to work in an inclusive environment. Some of the issues in training that need to be addressed include the methodology to be adopted for identifying children with disabilities; classroom management; use of appropriate teaching methodologies; skills for adapting the curriculum; development of teaching learning materials that are multi-sensory in nature; evaluation of learning; etc. The time has come to scale up successful experiments on teacher training such as the Multi-site Action Research Project and the Indian adaptation of the UNESCO Teacher Education Resource Pack, since these experiences are lying dormant. l Orientation training of policy-makers and education department officials, both at the state and block level, is essential. In addition, there is a need to develop on-site support systems for teachers. Grassroots workers, parents, special school teachers, para-teachers and other individuals can be shown how to provide the required support. l The existing handful of teacher trainers cannot reach the vast number of teachers working with children with disabilities in rural/remote areas. There is a need to explore alternatives such as training para-teachers, investing in pilot studies to develop tele-rehabilitation programmes, and exploring strategies for distance education. l The preparation of children in the form of early childhood intervention before enrolment is required. This would ensure that they do not drop out, are retained in schools, and compete equally with other children. l In order to strengthen inclusive practices, networking between existing practitioners (i.e., IEDC, DPEP, SSA, etc.) would be useful. Simultaneous implementation, and consistent monitoring, reinforcement and coordination between government departments and NGOs at national and state levels will promote inclusive practices. vi

13 INDIA INTRODUCTION The right to live with dignity and self-respect as a human being leads to a continuous analysis of policies and services aimed at marginalized sections. UNICEF s Medium-Term Strategic Plan for , in line with the Convention on the Rights of the Child, demands that all children have access to and complete an education of good quality. Several initiatives by governments, NGOs, INGOs, UN agencies and others have addressed the special education needs of children with disabilities, and some have successfully demonstrated examples of special and inclusive education. The genesis of special needs education in India can be traced back to pre-independent India. There are examples in Indian history that show that people with disabilities had educational opportunities, and that disability did not come in the way of learning. However, during the colonial period, India increasingly looked at educational models existing outside the country. Parents of children with disabilities, mainly from urban areas and with exposure to approaches prevalent in western countries, started schools for their children. Since the government had no policy on the education of children with disabilities, it extended grants to these private schools. This approach of setting up separate schools, mostly residential, spread across the country, although it was concentrated in urban areas. However, for a country the size of India, their numbers were small. For over a century, these special schools offered the only education available to children with disabilities because of the widespread belief that children with special needs could not be educated alongside others. This allowed a small number of children to have access to education but did not help these children to enter the mainstream community after completing their education. 1

14 EXAMPLES OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION After independence, the Indian Constitution directed the state to ensure provision of basic education to all children up to the age of 14 years. The education of people with disabilities was, however, not explicit in the early constitutional provisions except for guaranteeing similar rights for people with disabilities as other members of society. The Education Commission of 1966 (Kothari Commission) drew attention to the education of children with disabilities. In 1974, for the first time, the necessity of integrated education was explicitly emphasized under the scheme for Integrated Education for Disabled Children (IEDC). In pursuit of the goal of providing basic education for all, the National Policy on Education (1986) and its follow-up actions have been major landmarks. The World Declaration on Education for All adopted in 1990 gave further boost to the various processes already set in motion in the country. The Rehabilitation Council of India Act 1992 initiated a training programme for the development of professionals to respond to the needs of students with disabilities. The enactment of the People with Disability Act in 1996 provided legislative support. This act makes it mandatory to provide free education to children with disabilities in an appropriate environment until the age of 18 years. In 1999, the government passed the National Trust for Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act for the economic rehabilitation of people with disabilities. These acts have been instrumental in bringing about a perceptive change/ improvement in the attitude of government, NGOs and people with disabilities. In recent years, two major initiatives have been launched by the government for achieving the goals of universalization of elementary education (UEE): the District Primary Education Programme (DPEP) in 1994 and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) in Programmes launched in the recent past have been able to make only a limited impact in terms of increasing the participation of children with disabilities in formal education. This situation needs to change; a focused effort is required. Keeping in view recent initiatives on inclusive education, a comprehensive review is necessary to help in better understanding the present status of education of children with disabilities, and how inclusive education can be promoted. 2

15 INDIA OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study are as follows: l To asses the state of special needs and inclusive education in the country in terms of policies, resources and practices. l To identify and document the experiences of good practice models of special needs and inclusive education for children with disabilities. To provide recommendations to strengthen the capacity of the government and other partners in the country to bring about policy reforms and promote programmes that support inclusive education. 3

16 EXAMPLES OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION METHODOLOGY Good practice models were identified based on firsthand information from professionals and government officials concerned directly or indirectly with the education of children with special needs. The model practices were drawn from the five states of Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Kerala and Tamil Nadu. A team of five researchers travelled to these states and visited schools. School practices were documented and discussions were carried out with teachers, parents, children with disabilities and their peer groups. The views of NGOs, government officials and professionals from apex institutions for teacher training were collected through interviews. Secondary information on the status of special needs and inclusive education was obtained from government documents, reports and available literature. Checklists and semistructured interviews were used to collect primary information about inclusive practices. The nature of the investigation was quantitative and qualitative. 4

17 INDIA MAGNITUDE OF DISABILITY The UN ESCAP report on Issues Concerning Disability Statistics in the ESCAP Region states that: Many ESCAP developing and least developed countries and areas do not collect disability data. In the case of those that have done so, the data collected do not reflect the full extent of disability prevalence. This limitation is due in part to the conceptual framework adopted, the scope and coverage of the surveys undertaken, as well as the definitions, classifications and methodology used for disability data collection. In India, identification of children by head counting has posed many difficulties. Data on disability are generally under-reported as a result of a lack of adequate skills to identify children with invisible disabilities, and a lack of precise definitions for identifying children with mild and moderate disabilities. Disability identification in the population was included in the 2001 census; however, the data are yet to be published. A comprehensive countrywide sample survey was undertaken by the National Sample Survey Organisation in 1991 to estimate the number of people with disabilities. It was reported that about 1.9 per cent of the population (i.e., 16.2 million) have physical and sensory disabilities. According to UNICEF s Report on the Status of Disability in India 2000, there were around 30 million children suffering from some form of disability. The Sixth All-India Educational Survey (NCERT, 1998) reports that of India s 200 million school-aged children (6 14 years), 20 million require special needs education. While the national average of gross enrolment in school is over 90 per cent, less than five per cent of children with disabilities are in school. The majority of these children remain outside mainstream education. The low turnout can be attributed to causes such as difficulty in coping with general education demands and social reasons. Regional disparities in the number of children with special needs in India are shown in Table 1. Recognizing the problem of disability and regional disparities, the government and NGOs are initiating policy reforms and strategies for special needs and inclusive education. 5

18 EXAMPLES OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION Table 1: Percentage of population with disability by nature, sex and area State Gender Ratio Children with special needs, 0-4 years Children with special needs, 5-14 years Children with special needs, 0-14 years Andhra Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Assam Bihar Chhatisgarh Delhi Goa Gujarat Haryana Himachal Pradesh Jammu & Kashmir Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Manipur Meghalaya Mizoram Nagaland Orissa Punjab Rajasthan Sikkim Tamil Nadu Tripura Uttar Pradesh West Bengal *A&N Islands *Chandigarh *D&N Haveli *Daman& Diu *Lakshadweep *Pondichery INDIA Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Source: Census 2001, Government of India. Notes: * Union Territories 6

19 INDIA POLICIES CONCERNING EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES The Constitution of India and the educational policies envisaged in post-independent India reflect a perseverance and commitment to the fulfilment of UEE. The Constitution states that free and compulsory education should be provided for all children until they complete the age of 14 years. The first education commission in India (Kothari Commission, ) addressed issues of access and participation by all. It stressed a common school system open to all children irrespective of caste, creed, community, religion, economic condition and social status. In 1968, the National Education Policy followed the commission s recommendations and suggested the expansion of educational facilities for physically and mentally handicapped children, and the development of an integrated programme enabling handicapped children to study in regular schools. Two decades later, the National Policy on Education (NPE) (1986) stressed the removal of disparities in education, while attending to the specific needs of those who had been denied equality so far (MHRD, 1986). It stated the objective should be to integrate the physically and mentally handicapped with the general community as equal partners, to prepare them for normal growth, and to enable them to face life with courage and confidence. In 1987, to fulfil the provisions for disabled children in the NPE, the government launched the Project for Integrated Education Development (PIED). It states wherever feasible, the education of children with motor handicaps and other mild handicaps will be in common with that of others. According to the NPE, the indicators of integration are that handicapped people enjoy the same rights as the rest; have opportunities for growth and development in environmental conditions available to the rest; have access to the quality of life like any other citizen; and are treated as equal partners in the community. The programme of action outlined measures to implement the policy including massive inservice training programmes for teachers; an orientation programme for administrators; the development of supervisory expertise in resource institutions for school education at the district and block level; and provision of incentives such as supply of aids, appliances, textbooks and school uniforms. The NPE underwent modifications in 1992 (MHRD, 1992). It made an ambitious commitment to universal enrolment by the end of the Ninth Five-Year Plan for both categories of disabled children: those who could be educated in general primary school, and those who needed to be educated in special schools or special classes in general 7

20 EXAMPLES OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION schools. It also called for the reorientation of pre-service and in-service teacher education programmes. The NPE (1986) and revised NPE (1992) are the guiding policies at all levels. The most notable pedagogical recommendation is as follows. Curriculum flexibility is of special significance for these children. Special needs for these children will be met if child-centred education is practiced. Child-to-child help in education of the children with disabilities is an effective resource in view of large classes and multi-grade teaching. Another significant policy development in India took place following the ESCAP Proclamation on Full Participation and Equality of People with Disabilities in the Asia and Pacific Region in The Equal Opportunities and Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 1996 called for the education of children with disabilities up to the age of 18 years in an appropriate environment. The act grants equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation to people with disabilities. It includes a number of provisions that endeavour to promote the integration of students with disabilities into normal schools. It also upholds the role of special schools by asking schools in the government and private sector to promote their establishment. Although there is no specific mention of inclusive education in the act, it is judged to be breakthrough legislation relating to education and economic rehabilitation of people with disabilities. The economic rehabilitation section under this act stipulates that certain posts in various government departments and in the public sector are to be identified, and a percentage (three per cent) are to be reserved for people with disabilities. In 1999, the government passed the National Trust for Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act especially for the rehabilitation of people with disabilities. The issue of disability has also found a place in all the country s five-year plans (Box 1). Various national/apex-level institutes were established to deal with problems of specific disabilities. These institutes have been set up for education, training, vocational guidance, counselling, rehabilitation, research and training in various aspects of disability. 8

21 INDIA Box 1: Disability in five-year plans First Five-Year Plan: This witnessed the launching of a small unit by the Ministry of Education for the visually impaired in Subsequently, a training centre for adults with visual impairments was established. Second Five-Year Plan: Under the Ministry of Education, a National Advisory Council for the Physically Challenged started functioning to advise the central government on issues concerning education, training and employment of the disabled. Third Five-Year Plan: Attention was given to rural areas. To facilitate the training and rehabilitation of the physically challenged, the government formulated policies around some services: (a) planning employment exchange for the physically challenged; (b) teaching and provision of work facilities in the home itself or neighbourhood for those who are not mobile; (c) provision of recreation facilities for the physically challenged; (d) at least three per cent of job reservations and job facilities made available for the physically challenged. Fourth Five-Year Plan: More emphasis was given to preventive work for people with visual, speech and hearing impairments. National centres for the physically challenged were instituted to serve as demonstration projects in various parts of the country and provide necessary training facilities. Sixth Five-Year Plan: National policies were made around provision of community-oriented disability prevention and rehabilitation services to promote self-reliance, economic independence and social integration of the differently abled in the community, and comprehensive primary health care. National/apex-level institutes set up l National Institute for the Visually Handicapped (1982), an autonomous body in Dehradun l National Institute for the Orthopedically Handicapped (1982), Calcutta l Ali Yavar Jung National Institute for the Hearing Handicapped (1983), Mumbai l National Institute for the Mentally Handicapped (1984), Hyderabad l National Institute of Rehabilitation, Training and Research (1984), Orissa l Institute for the Physically Handicapped (1976), Delhi l Rehabilitation Council of India (1986), Delhi. Converted into a statutory body under the Rehabilitation Council of India Act One objective is to prescribe minimum standards for education and training of various categories of professionals dealing with people with disabilities. 9

22 EXAMPLES OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION In addition to the various policy initiatives at the national level, India has actively participated in the global declarations on Protection of Child Rights, Protection of Rights of Persons with Disability, UN Conventions on the Rights of the Child, Salamanca Declaration and other international policy initiatives. The UN Standard Rules for Persons with Disabilities states the following. States should recognize the principle of equal primary, secondary and tertiary educational opportunities for children, youth and adults with disabilities in integrated settings. They should ensure that the education of persons with disabilities is an integral part of the educational system. General education authorities are responsible for the education of persons with disabilities in integrated settings. Education for persons with disabilities should form an integral part of national educational planning, curriculum development and school organization. Regular schools with this inclusive orientation are the most effective means of combating discriminatory attitudes, creating welcoming communities, building an inclusive society and achieving education for all; moreover, they provide an effective education to the majority of children and improve the efficiency and ultimately the cost-effectiveness of the entire education system.... schools should accommodate all children regardless of their physical, intellectual, emotional, social, linguistic or other conditions. 10

23 INDIA RESOURCE ALLOCATION FOR EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES The government proposes to implement UEE in a mission mode with a clear focus on providing quality elementary education to children in the age group 6 14 years. It has allocated the following funds. l Rs 40 billion (4000 crore) for elementary education and literacy. l Rs 5 billion (500 crore) for Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. l Rs 9.3 billion (930 crore) for nutritional support to primary education. l Rs 11 billion (1100 crore) for the District Primary Education Project. l Rs 4 billion (400 crore) for Education Guarantee Scheme and Alternative Innovative Education. l Rs 5.2 billion (520 crore) for Operation Black Board. l Rs 3.64 billion (364 crore) for non-formal education. l Rs 2.2 billion (220 crore) for teacher training programmes. l Rs 2 billion (200 crore) for adult education. The Ministry of Human Resource Development has allocated Rs 315 million (31.50 crore) in the financial year for integrated education of disabled children. The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment has allocated Rs 2.14 billion ( crore) in the financial year, of which Rs 700 million (70 crore) is given to NGOs. The majority of special schools in India are run by NGOs. Almost all states in India have allocated resources for rehabilitation of people with disabilities. By and large, these resources are spent to sustain special schools and to pay pensions to people with disabilities (social security). Few states have budgets for community-based rehabilitation, integrated education and inclusive education. Since these concepts need more clarity at the operational level, state governments are yet to allocate resources to them. In India, disability remains a welfare issue and is not seen as a development issue. This is evident from the fact that disability is under the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (formerly the 11

24 EXAMPLES OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION Ministry of Social Welfare) and not under the Ministry of Human Resource Development. Thus, the small budget allocations are spent on paying pensions, providing assistive devices and maintaining institutions for the care of people with disabilities, etc. The central government directs state governments to spend three per cent of poverty alleviation funds on people with disabilities. Budgetary allocations are not enough to make significant impacts in the field of education. Unless state governments allocate funds for inclusive education at different levels, it will be difficult to achieve the goal of UEE because children with disabilities will continue to remain outside the reach of primary education. In addition to the lack of resources available, societal attitudes towards disability are also a hindrance and need to be changed. This can influence actions at the classroom level. In keeping with this need for change, there have been demands for bringing issues regarding education of all children under one ministry, namely, the Ministry of Human Resource Development, rather than keep children with disabilities under the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, as is currently the case. Such a merger will assist in better planning for all children. There is also a need for convergence of services in special schools, integrated schools, home-based services, and community-based rehabilitation programmes for promoting inclusive education. 12

25 INDIA NATIONAL-LEVEL PRACTICES ON EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES 7.1 Early childhood care and education It is now globally recognized that systematic provision of early childhood care and education (ECCE) can help in the development of children in a variety of ways, such as through group socialization, inculcation of healthy habits, stimulation of creative learning processes, and enhanced scope for overall personality development. ECCE is a support for UEE, and indirectly influences enrolment and retention of girls in primary schools by providing substitute care facilities for younger siblings. At present, the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) is the most widespread ECCE provision. In addition, there are pre-schools and balwadis under the Central Social Welfare Board. Some state government schemes and private efforts are also being undertaken. ECCE is being promoted as an holistic input for fostering health, psychosocial, nutritional and educational development of children. Efforts have to be made to achieve greater convergence of ECCE programmes implemented by various government departments as well as voluntary agencies by involving urban local bodies and gram panchayat (village councils). There is a need to promote an active policy of inclusion in pre-schools for children with disabilities. There is also an urgent need to develop tools for early identification using inclusive principles rather than looking at disabilities. ECCE will be possible only when there are strong linkages with the primary health care system. At present, experiments such as district rehabilitation centres, which work separately from primary health care, have not achieved much progress in ECCE. This is mainly because primary health care personnel lack of knowledge and skills on ECCE. Components on early identification and intervention of children with disabilities are limited in the curriculum of medical, nursing, and health workers training programmes, as well as in primary health care personnel training programmes. It is a requirement that curriculum should go beyond mere awareness building and lead to development of practical skills. 7.2 Project for Integrated Education Development (PIED) and Integrated Education for the Disabled Children (IEDC) The government launched the Project for Integrated Education Development (PIED) with assistance from UNICEF in The implementation of PIED in 10 demonstration sites in rural and urban contexts encouraged policy-makers to include children with moderate disabilities in In practice, children with multiple and severe disabilities were also integrated in project 13

26 EXAMPLES OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION areas as a consequence of the lack of special schools, and through the commitment to providing education for all that was generated in these areas. Evaluation of PIED showed higher retention rates of children with disabilities, and a positive change in teacher practices. The success of this project resulted in the centrally sponsored scheme launched by the Ministry for Human Resource Development called Integrated Education for Disabled Children (IEDC) in The objective of the scheme is to provide educational opportunities for children with disabilities in ordinary schools, so as to facilitate their retention in the school system. This scheme offers financial assistance towards the salary of special teachers, provision of aids and appliances for children with special needs, training of special teachers, removal of difficulties due to building design, provision of instructional materials, community mobilization, and early detection and resource support. It should be noted that no state government has state-sponsored schemes specifically for inclusive education. However, state governments sustain some components such as salaries of resource teachers in IEDC projects. IEDC has the scope for pre-school training of children with disabilities and counselling for parents, and 100 per cent financial assistance can be provided for education of these children. The launching of IEDC led to a focus on pedagogical approaches that respond to the needs of children with disabilities. Under IEDC, over 120,000 children with disabilities are being educated in over 24,000 mainstream schools. An evaluation of the project in 1994 showed that not only had enrolment of disabled children increased considerably, but the retention rate of disabled children had also increased, and was higher than that of normal children. It created greater awareness in ordinary schools about education of children with disabilities. General teachers acknowledged that working with children with disabilities helped them in becoming better educators. CBR Network (2001) also carried out a review with a view to scale up the educational access of children with disabilities in the state of Karnataka. The study reveals that the IEDC programme implemented by the government and NGOs had vast discrepancies in terms of teacher training and quality of services. Training programmes have been reduced from one year to 45 days or shorter periods. These training programmes or skills development programmes for general teachers and for resource teachers lack clarity. The short-term training curriculum to train general teachers varies from state to state in terms of objectives, content, duration and methodology. There also exists confusion about whether IEDC needs single-category disability teachers or multi-category resource teachers. Presently, the government recognizes both these programmes, and no policy exists on the roles and responsibilities of teachers at different levels. The IEDC implemented by NGOs uses a different pattern in comparison to IEDC implemented by the government. Discrepancies in teacher preparation are certainly an area of major concern. There is a need for adequate preparation of general teachers, textbooks, and learning materials based on inclusive education principles. The National Council for Educational Research and Training (NCERT) acknowledges that there is lack of clarity at different levels in understanding regarding inclusive education in the Indian context, and an urgent need to evolve operational frameworks for the planning and management of inclusive education. Although long overdue, recent efforts have been made by NCERT to evolve a framework in collaboration with NGOs who have initiated successful practices in inclusive education. Verma (2002) reports in an evaluation of IEDC in both DPEP and non-dpep districts 14