Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 1 of 13
|
|
- Shawn Tucker
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE x In re : Chapter 11 : Rural/Metro Corporation, et al., 1 : Case No (KJC) : Reorganized Debtor. : (Jointly Administered) : : Hearing Date: October 15, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. (ET) x REORGANIZED DEBTOR S OBJECTION, AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT THEREOF, TO CLASSIFICATION OF CLAIMS OF THE UNITED EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OF ARIZONA, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS LOCAL I-60 The above-captioned reorganized debtor (the Debtor or the Reorganized Debtor ), hereby files this objection, and memorandum of law in support thereof (collectively, the Objection ) to the claims filed by The United Medical Professionals of Arizona, International Association of Fire Fighters Local I-60 ( IAFF or the Union ) against the estate of Debtor Rural/Metro Corporation, 2 solely for purposes of determining the priority of the monetary portions -- not the amount or the enforceability of the non-monetary portions of the Union s claims under applicable non-bankruptcy law -- (the Claims ) against the estates (the Estates ). 3 In support of the Objection, the Reorganized Debtor respectfully states as follows: The last four digits of the Reorganized Debtor s federal tax identification number are (6929). The Reorganized Debtor s headquarters are located at 9221 E. Via de Ventura, Scottsdale, AZ The Initial Claims were filed against Debtor SW General Inc. (f/k/a Southwest Ambulance, Inc.) The consolidated proof of claim filed to amend the Initial Claims was filed against Debtor Rural/Metro Corporation. As confirmed on the record at the Hearing (as defined below), all of the Reorganized Debtor s rights to object to the Claims on any other basis, substantive or otherwise, are fully preserved, notwithstanding the applicability of Rule (f)(iii).
2 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 2 of 13 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 4 The Union appears to assert that some part of its Claims are entitled to priority treatment under the Bankruptcy Code, 5 notwithstanding the fact that the Claims are asserted under a collective bargaining agreement that expired prior to the Petition Date and relate to alleged prepetition violations of that agreement. During the course of ongoing post-effective date negotiations over a new collective bargaining agreement, the Union, prematurely and without prior discussion, filed the Plan Injunction Relief Motion on an expedited basis, seeking to enforce the Arbitration Award and intervene in the appeal of the Longevity Decision. For the reasons stated in the Reorganized Debtor s Response and on the record at the Hearing, (a) based on the information the Reorganized Debtor had at the time of the Hearing, (b) in light of the enactment eight days prior to the Hearing of a new law that directly impacted the cash outlay required to comply with the Arbitration Award, 6 and (c) dismayed by the disruption in what it believed to be fruitful, good faith negotiations with respect to a new collective bargaining agreement, the Reorganized Debtor was not then and is not now in a position to consent to lifting the Plan Injunction. Among other things, the instant dispute exists with respect to the asserted priority of the Claims, which is not only potentially relevant to the payment percentage of any damages that may be awarded in a non-bankruptcy Court proceedings, but is relevant to the source of payment with respect to any such award (i.e., payment as an Other Unsecured Claim through the Plan or payment by the Reorganized Debtor) Capitalized terms utilized in this Preliminary Statement shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms below. When read together, neither the Initial Claims, nor the Claims provide a clear picture as to the priority of the claims asserted, which, in part, is what precipitated the Objection and the Reorganized Debtor s request that the priority of the Claims be determined by this Court. To the extent that the Union asserts additional bases for priority treatment in its response to this Objection, the Reorganized Debtor reserves all rights and defenses with respect thereto. As noted in the Response, the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014 was signed into law on August 11, See H.R. 5021, 113th Cong. (2014). 2
3 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 3 of 13 Upon further analysis, with respect to the portions of the Union s Claims that fall within the prepetition period, such claims should be deemed to be general unsecured claims, perhaps with the exception of any portion of the Claims that may fall under the priority scheme set forth in sections 507(a)(4) and/or (a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, subject to the statutory caps set forth in the Bankruptcy Code, which the Union will ultimately have the burden to prove. To date, the Union has not asserted any claims that fall after the Petition Date and, to the extent such claims are asserted, the Reorganized Debtor reserves all of its rights. 7 JURISDICTION 1. This Court has jurisdiction to consider the Objection pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157 and 1334, and the Amended Standing Order of Reference from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware dated as of February 29, This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157(b)(2). Venue is proper before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C and The statutory and legal predicates for the relief sought herein are section 502(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy Code ) and Rule 3003 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the Bankruptcy Rules ). BACKGROUND A. General Background Information 2. On August 4, 2013 (the Petition Date ), Rural/Metro Corporation and certain of its affiliates (collectively, the Debtors ) filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (the Chapter 11 Cases ). 7 For the sake of clarity, through the Objection, the Reorganized Debtor is in no way seeking to avoid its obligations pursuant to Section 10.5 of the Plan with respect to the Pension Plan (as defined in the Plan). 3
4 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 4 of On August 15, 2013, the United States Trustee for the District of Delaware appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors [Docket No. 114]. No trustee or examiner was appointed in any of the Debtors cases. 4. Information regarding the Debtors businesses, their capital and debt structure, and the events leading to the filing of these Chapter 11 Cases is contained in the Declaration of Stephen Farber in Support of Chapter 11 Petition and First Day Pleadings [Docket No. 2]. B. The Claims 5. On or about October 22, 2013, the Union filed 5 separate claims (collectively, the Initial Claims ) against the estates arising from that certain Labor Agreement between IAFF and Southwest Ambulance (a subsidiary of Rural/Metro Corporation), which expired by its own terms on July 1, 2012 (the Collective Bargaining Agreement or the CBA ): Claim No. Debtor Amount Priority Asserted 1320 SW General Inc. Unliquidated General Unsecured Claim 1321 SW General Inc. Unliquidated Priority Claim in an amount not less than $200,000 plus interest 1322 SW General Inc. Unliquidated Unknown priority amount 1323 SW General Inc. Unliquidated Unknown priority amount 1324 SW General Inc. Unliquidated General Unsecured Claim 6. On March 3, 2014, the Reorganized Debtor filed the Debtors Third Omnibus (Non-Substantive) Objection to Claims Pursuant to 502(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules 3003 and 3007, and Local Rule [Docket No. 1047] (the Third Omnibus Objection ), wherein the Reorganized Debtor objected to, among other things, the Initial Claims as being duplicative, and sought to expunge Claim Nos
5 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 5 of On March 21, 2014, the Union filed IAFF Local I-60 s Objection to Debtors Third Omnibus (Non-Substantive) Objection to Claims Pursuant to 502(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules 3003 and 3007, and Local Rule [Docket No.1096], wherein the Union asserted that the Initial Claims were not duplicative in nature, but in fact asserted independent bases for the claims set forth therein. 8. To resolve the Third Omnibus Objection as it pertained to the Union, at the request of the Reorganized Debtor, on April 18, 2014, the Union amended its Initial Claim and filed one consolidated claim (Claim No. 1997) asserting all of the bases for its Claims against the Estates. The Initial Claims were expunged pursuant to the Order Sustaining Debtors Third Omnibus (Non-Substantive) Objection to Claims Pursuant to 502(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules 3003 and 3007, and Local Rule [Docket No. 1115] and Claim No was the sole remaining claim herein referred to as the Claims The Claims are based on various unfair labor practice charges that the Union filed with the National Labor Relations Board (the NLRB ) asserting that the Southwest Ambulance, Inc. ( Southwest Ambulance and, together with IAFF, the Parties ) underfunded pension benefits (the Pension ULP Charge ) and unilaterally ceased making longevity payments to eligible employees (the Longevity ULP Charge ) in violation of the expired Collective Bargaining Agreement. a. The Pension ULP Charge 10. After the Union filed a complaint with the NLRB relating to the Pension ULP Charge, the Parties attempted to resolve these charges consensually. As a result, the NLRB deferred processing the Pension ULP Charge. After failing to reach an agreement, the Parties 8 A copy of Claim No is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The CBA, the Arbitration Award, and the Longevity Decision (all as defined herein) are attached to the Claims as exhibits. 5
6 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 6 of 13 submitted the Pension ULP Charge to binding arbitration. As of the Petition Date, the arbitration was substantially complete all that remained outstanding was the issuance of the arbitration decision. The Debtors agreed to allow the arbitration to move forward solely to permit the arbitrator s decision to be issued without the need for the Union to obtain relief from the automatic stay from this Court. On April 14, 2014, the arbitrator issued his decision on the Pension ULP Charge (the Arbitration Award ). The Arbitration Award, among other things, ordered Southwest Ambulance to cease and desist from continuing to underfund the pension plan and to make any retroactive contributions necessary to ensure that the pension plan was fully funded. Through its filed proof of claim, the Union asserts that some specified portion of the Arbitration Award is entitled to priority pursuant to section 507(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code. b. The Longevity ULP Charge 11. Unlike the Pension ULP Charge, the NLRB issued a complaint in connection with the Longevity ULP Charge and referred the matter to an administrative law judge. The administrative law judge ruled against Southwest Ambulance and recommended that the NLRB issue a decision requiring Southwest Ambulance to, among other things, resume the longevity payments, make any outstanding payments, and to cease and desist from unilaterally terminating longevity pay. On May 8, 2014, the NLRB issued an order affirming the administrative law judge s findings with respect to the Longevity ULP Charge (the Longevity Decision ). On June 9, 2014, Southwest Ambulance commenced an appeal of the NLRB Decision before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ( Longevity Decision Appeal ). The Union is not a party to the Longevity Decision Appeal. Through its Claims, the Union asserts that a 6
7 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 7 of 13 portion not less than $200,000 of the Longevity Decision is entitled to priority pursuant to section 507(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code. 9 C. IAFF s Motion for Relief from the Plan Injunction 12. On July 31, 2014, IAFF filed the Motion of International Association of Fire Fighters, Local I-60, United Emergency Medical Professionals of Arizona for Relief from Plan Injunction Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 362(d) [Docket No. 1240] (the Plan Injunction Relief Motion ), seeking relief from the injunction (the Plan Injunction ) set forth in section 12.7 of the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization for Rural/Metro Corporation and Its Affiliated Debtors (as amended or supplemented, the Plan ), which was confirmed by this Court on December 17, 2013 [Docket No. 830], in order to allow it (a) to prosecute and enforce the terms of the Arbitration Award by either filing a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona and/or requesting that the NLRB enter an order with respect to the Pension ULP Charge, and (b) to intervene in the Longevity Decision Appeal. 13. On August 13, 2014, the Reorganized Debtor filed the Reorganized Debtor s Response to Motion of International Association of Fire Fighters, Local I-60, United Emergency Medical Professionals of Arizona for Relief from Plan Injunction Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 362(d) [Docket No. 1254] (the Reorganized Debtor s Response ), and on August 14, 2014, the Union filed a reply [Docket No. 1258] (the IAFF Reply ). 14. On August 19, 2014, the Court held a hearing on, among other things, the Plan Injunction Relief Motion, the Reorganized Debtor s Response, and the IAFF Reply (the Hearing ), at the conclusion of which, the Court adjourned the Plan Injunction Relief Motion until October 15, 2014, and directed the parties to submit briefs in support of their respective 9 The Reorganized Debtor reserves the right to assert in the proceedings surrounding the Longevity Decision Appeal that the Union is not appropriately a party in interest to intervene or otherwise directly recover on account of the Longevity ULP Charge. 7
8 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 8 of 13 positions with respect to the priority of the Union s Claims. On August 20, 2014, the Court entered a Scheduling Order Regarding Motion of International Association of Fire Fighters, Local I-60, United Emergency Medical Professionals of Arizona for Relief from Plan Injunction Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 362(d) and a Determination of the Priority of the Claims of International Association of Fire Fighters, Local I-60, United Emergency Medical Professionals of Arizona [Docket No. 1268] (the Scheduling Order ). ARGUMENT I. The Union s Claims Should be Deemed General Unsecured Claims A. The CBA Was Not Executory on the Petition Date, No Portion of the Union s Claims Constitute Cure Costs Under Section 365(b) of the Bankruptcy Code It is axiomatic under bankruptcy law that contracts that expired prior to the filing of a petition may not be assumed pursuant to section 365(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, because they are not executory. 11 See, e.g., Counties Contracting & Constr. Co. v. Constitution Life Ins. Co., 855 F.2d 1054, 1061 (3d Cir. 1988) ( Once the contract is no longer in existence, the right to assume it is extinguished. A contract may not be assumed under 365 if it has already expired according to its terms. ); In re Triangle Laboratories, Inc., 663 F.2d 463, 467 (3d Cir. 1981) ( [F]or Section 365 to apply, the contract or lease must be in existence. If the contract The CBA was included on a list of contract and leases to be assumed dated November 27, 2013, along with over a thousand other contracts and leases. Section 1113 of the Bankruptcy Code applies to the rejection or modification of a collective bargaining agreement. Although section 1113 references assumption, this provision does not provide any guidance on what must be done to assume a collective bargaining agreement. UFCW, Local 211 v. Family Snacks, Inc. (In re Family Snacks, Inc.), 257 B.R. 884, 899 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. Mo. 2001). As a result, some courts, including the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, have held that section 1113 does not apply to the assumption of a collective bargaining agreement and that assumption is governed by section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. American Flint Glass Workers Union v. Anchor Resolution Corp., 197 F.3d 76, 82 (3d Cir. 1999); Adventure Resources v. Holland, 137 F.3d 786, 798 (4th Cir. 1998); Family Snacks, Inc., 257 B.R. at 900; Mass. Air Conditioning & Heating Corp. v. Mc Coy, 196 B.R. 659, 663 (D. Mass. 1996). 8
9 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 9 of 13 or lease has expired by its own terms or has been terminated prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy case, then there is nothing left for the trustee to assume or assign. ) (citing 2 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY [13] (15th ed. 1981); EBC I, Inc. v. Am. Online, Inc. (In re EBC I, Inc.), 356 B.R. 631, 638 (Bankr. D. Del. 2006) ( [I]f a contract is terminated pre-petition it is no longer executory and section 365 is not applicable. ); Allied Corp. v. Frola, Case No , 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15778, at *11-12 (D.N.J. Oct. 6, 1992) (citing Counties Contracting & Constr. Co. v. Constitution Life Ins. Co., 855 F.2d 1054, 1061 (3d Cir. 1988)) ( A contract may not be assumed under 365 if it has already expired according to its terms. ). 16. The CBA was effective between July 1, 2009 and July 1, 2012, and therefore, had expired by its own terms prior to the Petition Date. Pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act (the NLRA ), parties to a collective bargaining agreement have an obligation to maintain the status quo during the post-expiration period while the parties negotiate the terms of a new collective bargaining agreement. See 29 U.S.C. 8(a)(5) and 8(d). More specifically, the NLRA require employers to bargain in good faith with respect to certain terms of collective bargaining agreements until an impasse is reached. See id.; Litton Fin. Printing Div. v. NLRB, 501 U.S. 190, 198 (U.S. 1991). As such, during the bankruptcy cases and thereafter, the parties to the CBA continued to operate under its terms while they attempted to negotiate the terms of a new CBA notwithstanding the fact that the CBA at issue had expired prior to the Petition Date. 17. That being said, after a collective bargaining agreement expires, the agreement itself does not govern; rather certain provisions of the expired collective bargaining agreement continue only by operation of the NLRA, not the contract, in order to define the status quo. Litton, 501 U.S. at 206. In other words, the obligations imposed by the NLRA to maintain the status quo are not contractual obligations. Id.; see also In re Hostess Brands, Inc., 477 B.R. 9
10 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 10 of , 380 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2012) ( [The] post-expiration regime is not one in which the collective bargaining agreement itself governs, but, rather, that the NLRB governs in a way that leaves key provisions, but not all of the provisions, of the collective bargaining agreement in effect under the law. ). Indeed, the terms of an expired collective bargaining agreement retain legal significance only because they define the status quo. Rights and duties under a collective bargaining agreement do not otherwise survive a contract s termination at an agreed expiration date. Derrico v. Sheehan Emergency Hospital, 844 F.2d 22, (2d Cir. 1988). 18. As the CBA expired prior to the Petition Date, it was not assumed pursuant to section 365(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, and any purported or attempted assumption was a legal nullity. In re Commodity Merchants, Inc., 538 F.2d 1260 (7th Cir. 1976); Allied Corp. v. Frola, Case No , 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (D.N.J. Oct. 6, 1992). Accordingly, the substantial bulk of the Arbitration Award and the Union s Claims generally cannot be properly categorized as cure claims pursuant to section 365(b), but are more accurately categorized as general unsecured claims for prepetition damages. B. The Union s Claims Arise from Prepetition Actions Based on an Expired Prepetition Collective Bargaining Agreement 19. At issue is a private dispute between parties with respect to the appropriate funding calculations for the Pension Plan in connection with the Arbitration Award and the amount due in connection with the Longevity Decision currently under appeal, both of which arise under an agreement that arose, and terminated by its own terms, prior to the Petition Date. More specifically, the Arbitration Award directs Southwest Ambulance to fund the pension plan retroactively to July 1, 2008 more than five years prior to the Petition Date. Thus, the majority of the Arbitration Award relates to the prepetition period and is not entitled to priority status, 10
11 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 11 of 13 with, perhaps, very limited exceptions (as described below). 12 The Longevity Decision likewise directs retroactive payments for a time period that occurred prior to the Petition Date. 20. Claims that arise prepetition that relate to prepetition actions are treated as general unsecured claims under the Bankruptcy Code. Stewart Foods v. Broecker (In re Stewart Foods), 64 F.3d 141 (4th Cir. 1995); In re Hechinger Inv. Co. of Del., Inc., Case No JJF, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25552, at *10 (D. Del. Mar. 21, 2001). To hold otherwise, would run afoul of one of the key purposes of the Bankruptcy Code an equitable distribution to similarlysituated creditors of a debtor s estate. In re Semcrude, L.P., 399 B.R. 388, 399 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009) ( One of the primary goals -- if not the primary goal -- of the [Bankruptcy] Code is to ensure that similarly-situated creditors are treated fairly and enjoy an equality of distribution from a debtor[.] ). The claims at issue in the Union s filed proof of claim arise from damages in what is akin to an alleged prepetition breach of contract dispute, and the law is clear that such claims do not confer a benefit to the estate. Indeed, [p]re-filing debts are not administrative expenses; they are the antithesis of administrative expenses. In re Kmart Corp., 359 F.3d 866, 872 (7th Cir. 2004), cert. denied sub nom. (emphasis supplied); see also Former Emps. of Builders Square Retail Stores v. Hechinger Inv. Co. (In re Hechinger Inv. Co.), 298 F.3d 219, 226 (3d Cir. Del. 2002) (holding that prepetition services cannot give rise to an administrative expense); In re Hackney, 351 B.R. 179, 195 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2006) (same). As such, the Court should rule that all portions of the Claims that fall prior to the Petition Date are general unsecured claims that should be paid in accordance with the terms of the Plan. 12 As set forth on the record at the Hearing and in the Reorganized Debtor s Response, the Parties disagree as to the amount required, if any, the Reorganized Debtor would have to pay if the Arbitration Award were enforced. The Reorganized Debtor further noted at the Hearing that as the Pension Plan has not been amended, the Arbitration Award is not ripe for enforcement and that the Reorganized Debtor is hopeful that these and the other complex, non-bankruptcy issues involved in this contested matter can be resolved through a global resolution under a new collective bargaining agreement. 11
12 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 12 of 13 II. To the Extent that Any Portion of the Arbitration Award and/or the Longevity Decision Are Entitled to Elevated Treatment Under the Bankruptcy Code, Such Priority is Limited to Sections 507(a)(5) and (a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, Respectively. 21. Finally, to the extent that the Union is able demonstrate 13 that any portion of the Claims are entitled to priority, it would solely be pursuant to sections 507(a)(4) and/or (a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code. That being said, any amounts entitled to priority would be (a) subject to the statutory caps set forth in sections 507(a)(4) and (a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, and (b) would necessarily be reduced by any payments on prepetition claims made, including, among other things, under those sections pursuant to Order (I) Authorizing Debtors to Pay (A) Prepetition Employee Wages, Salaries and Other Compensation, (B) Prepetition Employee Business Expenses, and (C) Other Miscellaneous Employee Expenses and Employee Benefits; and (II) Granting Related Relief [Docket No. 55] and the Order Granting Continuation of Severance Program and Authorizing Debtors to Pay PTO in the Ordinary Course of Business [Docket No. 162] (collectively, the Wage Orders ) entered at the outset of these Chapter 11 Cases. 22. To be clear, the Reorganized Debtor is not asking this Court to determine the amount of the Claims that could be subject to priority treatment under sections 507(a)(4) and/or (a)(5), but is merely seeking a ruling as to the priority of the Union s Claims that are not subject to these provisions. Indeed, given the ongoing global settlement negotiations that were well underway when the Plan Injunction Relief Motion was filed, and given the fact that the Claims remain unliquidated, the Reorganized Debtor felt that it was premature to formally reconcile the priority of the Union s Claims before this Court. Unfortunately, the advent of the 13 The Union bears of the burden of demonstrating that any parts of its claims are entitled to administrative priority under section 507 of the Bankruptcy Code. The party seeking to establish a priority claim bears the burden of proving that the party's claim qualifies for priority status. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy
13 Case KJC Doc 1280 Filed 09/10/14 Page 13 of 13 Plan Injunctive Relief Motion left the Reorganized Debtor with no choice but to address the issue of the priority of the Union s Claims prior to the final adjudication of the Longevity Decision and the determination of the appropriate funding calculations under applicable nonbankruptcy law as to the Pension ULP Charge. CONCLUSION 23. For the reasons set forth above, the Union s Claims relate to prepetition actions under a Collective Bargaining Agreement that expired prior to the Petition Date. As such, the bulk of the Union s Claims should be deemed general unsecured claims against the Estates. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS 24. The Reorganized Debtor reserves all rights and defenses under the Plan and otherwise to dispute the priority of the Union s claims to the extent set forth in the Claims, as well as any additional arguments that the Union may assert in response to this Objection. Dated: September 10, 2014 Wilmington, Delaware YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP /s/ Maris J. Kandestin Edmon L. Morton (No. 3856) Maris J. Kandestin (No. 5294) Ashley E. Markow (No. 5635) Rodney Square 1000 North King Street Wilmington, DE (302) (302) (Fax) emorton@ycst.com mkandestin@ycst.com amarkow@ycst.com Counsel to the Reorganized Debtor 13
Case 13-11952-KJC Doc 83 Filed 08/09/13 Page 1 of 5
Case 13-11952-KJC Doc 83 Filed 08/09/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------x In re : Chapter 11 : Rural/Metro
More informationCase 12-11661-KJC Doc 4624 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 7
Case 12-11661-KJC Doc 4624 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------x In re : Chapter 11 : WP
More informationCase 15-12054-KG Doc 373 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11
Case 15-12054-KG Doc 373 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: CITY SPORTS, INC., et al., Chapter 11 Case No. 15-12054 (KG) Debtors. 1 Jointly Administered
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: TETRAGENEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 10-78439-reg Debtor RECITALS: ORDER APPROVING THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) Chapter 7 Liquidation ) marchfirst, INC., et al., ) CASE NO. 01 B 24742 ) (Substantively Consolidated)
More information: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL 450 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017 Telephone (212) 450-4000 Facsimile (212) 450-6501 Benjamin S. Kaminetzky Elliot Moskowitz Daniel J. Schwartz Counsel to the Debtors and
More information11-15463-shl Doc 8096 Filed 05/10/13 Entered 05/10/13 11:28:56 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 Case No. : AMR CORPORATION, et al., : 11-15463
More informationCase 15-12054-KG Doc 284 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11
Case 15-12054-KG Doc 284 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: CITY SPORTS, INC., et al., Chapter 11 Case No. 15-12054 (KG) Debtors. 1 Jointly Administered
More informationCase 10-32200 Document 33 Filed in TXSB on 04/21/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 10-32200 Document 33 Filed in TXSB on 04/21/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ENTERED 04/21/2010 ) IN RE ) ) SOUTHWEST GUARANTY,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. In re Case No. 13-23483 JANICE RENEE PUGH, Chapter 13 Debtor.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re Case No. 13-23483 JANICE RENEE PUGH, Chapter 13 Debtor. MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEBTOR S OBJECTION TO INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE S MOTION
More informationCase 15-10197-BLS Doc 1755 Filed 04/09/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : Chapter 11
Case 15-10197-BLS Doc 1755 Filed 04/09/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re RADIOSHACK CORPORATION, et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 15-10197 (BLS) (Jointly Administered)
More informationHow To Get A Court To Let A Bankruptcy Case To Go Through
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------- IN RE: MICHELLE MARIE WARD CASE NO. 03-66503 Debtor Chapter 13 ---------------------------------------------------------
More informationCase 12-18134 Doc 388 Filed 07/08/13 Entered 07/08/13 17:28:28 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11
Document Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EASTERN DIVISION ) IN RE: ) ) Chapter 7 THE UPPER CRUST, LLC, et al. 1 ) Case No. 12-18134-HJB Debtors ) (Jointly Administered)
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: REAL MEX RESTAURANTS, INC., et al., Debtors. 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 11-13122(BLS) (Jointly Administered)
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. JUNG BEA HAN and Case No. 00-42086 HYUNG SOOK HAN, v. Adv. No.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In Re JUNG BEA HAN and Case No. 00-42086 HYUNG SOOK HAN, Debtors. JUNG BEA HAN, Plaintiff. v. Adv. No. 05-03012 GE CAPITAL SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE
More informationCase 16-60040 Document 80 Filed in TXSB on 05/13/16 Page 1 of 5
Case 16-60040 Document 80 Filed in TXSB on 05/13/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION IN RE: LINN ENERGY LLC, et al. Debtor(s). Chapter
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Thomas J. Salerno (AZ Bar No. 007492) tsalerno@ssd.com Jordan A. Kroop (AZ Bar No. 018825) jkroop@ssd.com Kelly Singer (AZ Bar No. 022024) ksinger@ssd.com SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P. Two Renaissance
More informationCHAPTER 9 Municipality Bankruptcy
U.S. COURTS HTTP://WWW.USCOURTS.GOV/FEDERALCOURTS/BANKRUPTCY/BANKRUPTCY BASICS/CHAPTER9.ASPX CHAPTER 9 Municipality Bankruptcy The chapter of the Bankruptcy Code providing for reorganization of municipalities
More informationMEMORANDUM CONCERNING TRUSTEE OBJECTIONS TO CHAPTER 13 PLANS AT CONFIRMATION: How to Avoid and/or Resolve Such Objections
MEMORANDUM CONCERNING TRUSTEE OBJECTIONS TO CHAPTER 13 PLANS AT CONFIRMATION: How to Avoid and/or Resolve Such Objections The information as contained in this Memorandum is being provided as a courtesy
More informationCase 16-20012 Document 619 Filed in TXSB on 05/27/16 Page 1 of 7
Case 16-20012 Document 619 Filed in TXSB on 05/27/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 SHERWIN ALUMINA COMPANY, LLC,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ---------------------------------------------------------------x In re Chapter 9 CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION. v. AP No. 08-70044 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Document Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION IN RE: DENISE L. EVANS, Case No. 08-71204-CMS-07 Debtor. PREMIER SELF STORAGE, LLC., Plaintiff,
More information13-22840-rdd Doc 1181 Filed 08/10/15 Entered 08/10/15 11:09:58 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In re: Chapter 11 SOUND SHORE MEDICAL CENTER OF WESTCHESTER, et al.
More informationCase 14-24874-KCF Doc 12 Filed 07/21/14 Entered 07/21/14 18:47:10 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9
Case 14-24874-KCF Doc 12 Filed 07/21/14 Entered 07/21/14 18:47:10 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9 LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP Kenneth A. Rosen, Esq. Jeffrey D. Prol, Esq. Ira M. Levee, Esq. 65 Livingston Avenue
More informationCase 13-11482-KJC Doc 4457 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 13-11482-KJC Doc 4457 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 11 ) EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, ) Case No. 13-11482 (KJC) ) Reorganized
More informationJURISDICTION AND VENUE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: AR BROADCASTING HOLDINGS, INC., et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 11-13674 (BLS) (Joint Administration Pending) DEBTORS' MOTION
More informationDebtors. Debtor. JOEL B. ROSENTHAL United States Bankruptcy Judge. These matters come before the Court on 1) a Motion to Approve the Settlement of
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: Miguel Andrade and Jessica Andrade Chapter 7 Case No. 10-42877 Debtors. In re: Maria Alaimo Chapter 7 Case No. 07-46595 Debtor. MEMORANDUM
More informationCase 08-11586-KG Doc 7468 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 08-11586-KG Doc 7468 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 11 ) MERVYN S HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., 1 ) Case No. 08-11586 (KG)
More informationMOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO RETAIN AND COMPENSATE PROFESSIONALS USED IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP Four Times Square New York, New York 10036 (212) 735-3000 J. Gregory Milmoe (JGM 0919) Sally McDonald Henry (SMH 0839) Attorneys for Refco Inc., et al., Debtors
More informationCase 12-51502 Doc 3203 Filed 03/13/13 Entered 03/13/13 17:19:29 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI In Re: ) Chapter 11 ) Case No. 12-51502-659 PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION, et al., ) Jointly Administered ) Honorable Kathy Surratt-States
More informationCROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY PROTOCOL FOR 360NETWORKS INC. AND ITS AFFILIATED COMPANIES
CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY PROTOCOL FOR 360NETWORKS INC. AND ITS AFFILIATED COMPANIES 1. Certain defined terms used in this Protocol shall have the meanings assigned to them in Appendix A. 2. The 360 Group
More informationCase 15-10952-KJC Doc 826 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 15-10952-KJC Doc 826 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC., ET AL., Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 15-10952 (KJC)
More informationCase 15-11402-KJC Doc 284 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 15-11402-KJC Doc 284 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: NORTHSHORE MAINLAND SERVICES, INC., et al. Debtors. 1 Chapter 11 Case No.
More informationBUYING AND SELLING ASSETS FROM AN ENTITY IN CHAPTER 11
BUYING AND SELLING ASSETS FROM AN ENTITY IN CHAPTER 11 Francis P. Dicello, Esq. I. Sources of Financial Information for Troubled Companies A. Nonbankruptcy Sources 1. Lien Judgment Search 2. Reports to
More informationCase 08-01176-AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION
Case 08-01176-AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION In re: JOSE SANCHEZ Case No.: 01-42230-BKC-AJC and FANNY SANCHEZ, Chapter
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO In Re: JUDGE RICHARD L. SPEER Metropolitan Environmental, Inc. Debtor(s (Related Case: 01-35756 Bruce C. French, Trustee Plaintiff(s v.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: TPOP, LLC, 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 13-11831 (BLS) Debtors. Hearing Date: December 11, 2013 at 10am Objection Deadline: December 4,
More informationIn re Washington Mutual, Inc.: Delaware Bankruptcy Court Limits Debtors Release of Third Parties. March/April 2011. Mark A. Cody
In re Washington Mutual, Inc.: Delaware Bankruptcy Court Limits Debtors Release of Third Parties March/April 2011 Mark A. Cody In a recent decision, Judge Mary F. Walrath of the United States Bankruptcy
More informationCase 10-93904-BHL-11 Doc 416 Filed 03/31/11 EOD 03/31/11 15:52:22 Pg 1 of 12 SO ORDERED: March 31, 2011.
Case 10-93904-BHL-11 Doc 416 Filed 03/31/11 EOD 03/31/11 15:52:22 Pg 1 of 12 SO ORDERED: March 31, 2011. Basil H. Lorch III United States Bankruptcy Judge IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN
More informationTHE LEGAL REPORT. Aaron L. Castle. VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, P.C. MUNICIPAL BANKRUPTCY IN MICHIGAN Mapping the Uncharted Waters
THE LEGAL REPORT Aaron L. Castle VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, P.C. MUNICIPAL BANKRUPTCY IN MICHIGAN Mapping the Uncharted Waters How many different words can you think of using the letters in the word
More informationAugustine, FL not in Debtors' personal name. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION In re: Case No. 3:08-bk-1882-PMG Chapter 13 RAY KEMP STANSBURY and JENNIFER L. STANSBURY, Debtors. / ORDER ON DEBTORS' OBJECTION
More informationIndividual Chapter 11 Cases: Case Closing Reconsidered
Individual Chapter 11 Cases: Case Closing Reconsidered Written by: Walter W. Theus, Jr. Executive Office for U.S. Trustees; Washington, D.C. walter.w.theus@usdoj.gov Individuals have been filing chapter
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO In re: ALAN GREENWAY, Bankruptcy Case No. 04-04100 dba Greenway Seed Co., Debtor. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Appearances: D. Blair Clark, RINGERT,
More informationCase 11-08830-8-RDD Doc 57 Filed 01/29/13 Entered 01/29/13 11:52:04 Page 1 of 8
Case 11-08830-8-RDD Doc 57 Filed 01/29/13 Entered 01/29/13 11:52:04 Page 1 of 8 SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 29 day of January, 2013. Randy D. Doub United States Bankruptcy Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
More informationCase 07-10160 Doc 43 Filed 10/15/07 Entered 10/15/07 15:16:54 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Case 07-10160 Doc 43 Filed 10/15/07 Entered 10/15/07 15:16:54 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY IN RE: GARY L. STRODE MAE R. STRODE CASE NO. 07-10160(1(13
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11. Jointly Administered
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: CD LIQUIDATION CO., LLC, f/ka CYNERGY DATA, LLC, et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 09-13038 (KG) Jointly Administered Related
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CHAPTER 13 PLAN [MOTION FOR FRBP RULE 3012 VALUATION HEARING]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CHAPTER 13 PLAN [MOTION FOR FRBP RULE 3012 VALUATION HEARING] Original plan Amended plan -- Date amended: The debtor's future earnings are submitted
More informationORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 17, 2011.
Case 11-01923-EPK Doc 38 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 9 [Tagged Opinion] ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 17, 2011. Erik P. Kimball, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: KARSONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Debtor. Chapter 11 Case No. 10-07307 DEBTOR'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT
More informationASSESSING THE RISK OF A MUNICIPALITY S REORGANIZING UNDER CHAPTER 9 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE
ASSESSING THE RISK OF A MUNICIPALITY S REORGANIZING UNDER CHAPTER 9 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE By John E. Mitchell, Baker & McKenzie, LLP (Dallas) (john.mitchell@bakermckenzie.com) and Angela B. Degeyter,
More informationCase 12-51502 Doc 5352 Filed 02/07/14 Entered 02/07/14 10:09:46 Main Document Pg 1 of 6
Pg 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION In re: PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 12-51502-659 (Jointly Administered)
More information4:13-cv-10877-MAG-LJM Doc # 16 Filed 07/03/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 126 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
4:13-cv-10877-MAG-LJM Doc # 16 Filed 07/03/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 126 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL BUSSARD, v. Plaintiff, SHERMETA, ADAMS AND VON ALLMEN,
More informationWHAT EVERY ATTORNEY NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT BANKRUPTCY
WHAT EVERY ATTORNEY NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT BANKRUPTCY 6 Nevada Lawyer March 2014 Where to Look BY CANDACE C. CARLYON, ESQ. AND ADAM BOWLER, ESQ. A great starting point in a search for bankruptcy information
More information13-22840-rdd Doc 402 Filed 10/25/13 Entered 10/25/13 16:17:31 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. (Jointly Administered)
Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------x In re: SOUND SHORE MEDICAL CENTER OF WESTCHESTER, et al., 1 Debtors.
More informationNotice of Formation Solicitation for Official Committee of Student Creditors
Office of the United States Trustee District of Delaware 844 King Street, Suite 2207 Wilmington, DE 19801 Tel. No. (302) 573-6491 Fax No. (302) 573-6497 IN RE: Chapter 11 Corinthian Colleges, Inc., et
More informationCase 08-06092-mhm Document 1 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 08-06092-mhm Document 1 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: JOHN WAYNE ATCHLEY and CASE NO. 05-79232-MHM ROBIN
More informationPayment System Override Deems Transaction Not Ordinary
Payment System Override Deems Transaction Not Ordinary Ames Merchandising Corp. v. Cellmark Paper Inc. (In re Ames Dept. Stores, Inc.), 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 969 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2011) In Ames Merchandising
More informationBankruptcy Court Has Broad Discretion to Estimate and Temporarily Allow Claims for Voting Purposes. March/April 2005. Kelly Neff and Mark G.
Bankruptcy Court Has Broad Discretion to Estimate and Temporarily Allow Claims for Voting Purposes March/April 2005 Kelly Neff and Mark G. Douglas Protracted delay in liquidating claims against a chapter
More informationJOINT OBJECTION OF M-HEAT INVESTORS, LLC AND CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE OF MICRO-HEAT, INC. TO CONFIRMATION OF DEBTORS AMENDED JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP Attorneys for M-Heat Investors, LLC 171 Monroe Avenue, NW, Suite 1000 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 Telephone: (616) 742-3930 Facsimile: (616) 742-3999 Patrick E. Mears (PM-6473) Telephone:
More informationFederal Labor Laws. Paul K. Rainsberger, Director University of Missouri, Labor Education Program Revised, September 2008
Federal Labor Laws Paul K. Rainsberger, Director University of Missouri, Labor Education Program Revised, September 2008 XXI. Bankruptcy Law Considerations in Collective Bargaining A. The Bankruptcy Reform
More informationCase 15-12054-KG Doc 123 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 15-12054-KG Doc 123 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: CITY SPORTS, INC., et al., Chapter 11 Case No. 15-12054 (KG) Debtors. 1 (Jointly Administered)
More informationCase:14-26132-EEB Doc#:10 Filed:12/03/14 Entered:12/03/14 16:04:24 Page1 of 4
Case:14-26132-EEB Doc#:10 Filed:12/03/14 Entered:12/03/14 16:04:24 Page1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO CLINE MINING CORPORATION, Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding. (Joint Administration
More informationCase 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,
More informationBy John J. Lamoureux Carlton Fields, P.A. Tampa, Florida. On April 20, 2005 President Bush signed into law the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and
RECENT CHANGES TO THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY CODE WHAT CONSTRUCTION LAWYERS SHOULD KNOW AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT SUCH CHANGES MAY HAVE ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS By John J. Lamoureux Carlton Fields, P.A.
More informationCommon Issues That Arise When a Party to Litigation is in Financial Distress
Stressed About Distress: What Happens When One of the Parties to Your Lawsuit Is in Danger of Filing, or Actually Does File, Bankruptcy? Common Issues That Arise When a Party to Litigation is in Financial
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR CHAPTER 13 CASE ADMINISTRATION FOR AUSTIN DIVISION
SIGNED this 28th day of February 2003. Larry E. Kelly Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge Leif M. Clark United States Bankruptcy Judge Ronald B. King United States Bankruptcy Judge Frank R. Monroe United
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. NEWSTAR ENERGY, U.S.A., INC., Case No. SL 99-02724
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN In re: NEWSTAR ENERGY OF TEXAS, LLC, Case No. SL 99-02723 Debtor. Chapter 11 / In re: NEWSTAR ENERGY, U.S.A., INC., Case No. SL 99-02724
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Case No. 8:90-bk-10016-PMG. Debtor. Chapter 11
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION In re: Case No. 8:90-bk-10016-PMG THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, Debtor. Chapter 11 ORDER ON PROPERTY DAMAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE S MOTION
More informationUnited States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California
6:12-15990 #51.00 Confirmation of Plan Also #15 EH Docket #: Tentative Ruling: On March 9, 2012, Debtors filed a voluntary Petition. On the same day, Debtors filed their Plan (the Plan ). The Plan included
More informationDetermining Tax Liability Under Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code
Determining Tax Liability Under Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (the Code ) provides the means by which a debtor or trustee in bankruptcy may seek a determination
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION Plaintiff, v. AWS
More informationMEMORANDUM ON TRUSTEE S MOTIONS TO DISMISS
MEMORANDUM ON TRUSTEE S MOTIONS TO DISMISS In certain circumstances, the Trustee will file a motion to dismiss a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding. The purpose of this Memorandum is to discuss the most
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND at GREENBELT. In Re: Debtor Chapter 7. vs. Adversary No.
Entered: July 31, 2013 Case 13-00202 Doc 20 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 10 Date signed July 31, 2013 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND at GREENBELT In Re: Fely Sison Tanamor
More informationBANKRUPTCY. Westlaw Journal. Part 2: How to Maximize Recovery by Properly Asserting Claims for Goods Sold to a Debtor in the 20 Days Before Bankruptcy
Westlaw Journal BANKRUPTCY Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 7, ISSUE 18 / JANUARY 7, 2011 Expert Analysis Show Me the Money! Bankruptcy Claims Under Section
More informationCase 3:10-bk-02805-PMG Doc 1084 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:10-bk-02805-PMG Doc 1084 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION In re: LYDIA CLADEK, INC., Debtor. / CASE NO. 3-10-bk-02805-PMG
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 10-3272. In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor. ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 10-3272 In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor NOT PRECEDENTIAL ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. On Appeal from the United States District
More informationProposed Attorneys for The Roman Catholic Bishop of Stockton UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
1 1 1 1 STEVEN H. FELDERSTEIN, State Bar No. 0 PAUL J. PASCUZZI, State Bar No. 1 JENNIFER E. NIEMANN, State Bar No. FELDERSTEIN FITZGERALD WILLOUGHBY & PASCUZZI LLP 00 Capitol Mall, Suite 0 Sacramento,
More informationCase 09-11204-sr Doc 1627 Filed 01/13/10 Entered 01/13/10 14:27:46 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11 OPINION
Document Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: : CHAPTER 11 : PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, LLC, ET AL : CASE NO. 09-11204 SR : DEBTOR(S) : JOINTLY
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
SO ORDERED. DONE and SIGNED July 23, 2014. STEPHEN V. CALLAWAY UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION IN RE: ) CASE NO.: 14-11203
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In Re: Jason D. Misleh, Case Number: 15-41721 Debtor. Chapter 13 Honorable Mark A. Randon / I. INTRODUCTION OPINION AND ORDER
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: ) ) Citation Corporation, et al., ) Case No. 04-08130-TOM-11 ) Chapter 11 Debtors. ) Jointly
More informationUnited States Bankruptcy Court District of
B25B (Official Form 25B) (12/08) United States Bankruptcy Court District of In re, Case No. Debtor Small Business Case under Chapter 11 [NAME OF PLAN PROPONENT] S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, DATED [INSERT DATE]
More informationCase:14-04744-BKT11 Doc#:67 Filed:10/09/14 Entered:10/09/14 15:14:42 Document Page 1 of 7
Case:-0-BKT Doc#: Filed:0/0/ Entered:0/0/ :: Document Page of IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 0 IN RE: CASE NO. -0 Chapter TRIPLE A & R CAPITAL INVESTMENT, INC Debtor(s)
More informationYOUNG, MORPHIS, BACH & TAYLOR, L.L.P.
YOUNG, MORPHIS, BACH & TAYLOR, L.L.P. Attorneys at Law 400 Second Avenue, N.W. (28601) Post Office Drawer 2428 Hickory, North Carolina 28603-2428 Telephone: 828-322-4663 Facsimile: 828-322-2023 E-mail:
More informationPrepared by: Hon. Duncan W. Keir, Judge U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland. and. Richard L. Wasserman, Esq.
Memorandum Summarizing Procedures With Respect To Removal Of Bankruptcy-Related State Court Actions To The United States District Court And United States Bankruptcy Court In Maryland Prepared by: Hon.
More informationMEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: MARK RICHARD LIPPOLD, Debtor. FOR PUBLICATION Chapter 7 Case No. 11-12300 (MG) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF
More informationCase 15-01019-jal Doc 14 Filed 11/20/15 Entered 11/20/15 15:20:55 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Case 15-01019-jal Doc 14 Filed 11/20/15 Entered 11/20/15 15:20:55 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY IN RE: TIMOTHY SCOTT STURGEON CASE NO. 15-10309 (1(7 Debtor(s
More informationMarch 26, 2009. Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515. Dear Madam Speaker:
March 26, 2009 Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Madam Speaker: I have the honor to submit to the Congress the amendments to the Federal Rules of
More informationJurisdiction and Venue in Chapter 15 Selected Issues
Jurisdiction and Venue in Chapter 15 Selected Issues Prepared by: Jeanne P. Darcey Sullivan & Worcester LLP Boston, MA jdarcey@sandw.com October 8, 2013 Please visit us on our website at www.sandw.com
More information11-15059-mg Doc 1847 Filed 04/17/14 Entered 04/17/14 17:21:50 Main Document Pg 1 of 16
11-15059-mg Doc 1847 Filed 04/17/14 Entered 04/17/14 172150 Main Document Pg 1 of 16 Hearing Date and Time May 22, 2014 at 200 p.m. (Prevailing Eastern Time) Response Deadline May 15, 2014 at 400 p.m.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION IN RE: JOHN ALLEN MOORE and MELISSA JANE MOORE, Debtors No. 2:07-bk-70963 Ch. 13 ORDER Before the Court is a Motion
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 EVERGREEN SOLAR, INC., Case No. 11-12590 (MFW Debtor. Jointly Administered U.S. BANK N.A., Plaintiff, v. Adv. No. 13-50486
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Document Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION In Re: ) ) TANITA M. CAIN, ) Case No. 13-04056-TOM-7 ) Debtor. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
More informationIn re: Chapter 11. 824 SOUTH EAST BOULEVARD REALTY, INC., Case No. 11-15728 (ALG) MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER. Introduction
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x NOT FOR PUBLICATION In re: Chapter 11 824 SOUTH EAST BOULEVARD REALTY,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO In Re: ) ) CHIEF JUDGE RICHARD L. SPEER Paul I. Hickman ) ) Debtor(s) ) ) (Related Case: 00-31579) Paul Hickman ) ) Plaintiff(s) ) ) v.
More informationU.S. Bankruptcy Basics
SHEPPARD MULLIN SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W U.S. Bankruptcy Basics Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP Edward H. Tillinghast, III etillinghast@sheppardmullin.com
More informationThe Fate of Anti-Assignment Clauses After Bankruptcy
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com The Fate of Anti-Assignment Clauses After Bankruptcy
More informationCase 15-10952-KJC Doc 431 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 15-10952-KJC Doc 431 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC., et al. 1 Case No. 15-10952 (KJC) Jointly
More informationSIGNED this 31st day of August, 2010.
SIGNED this 31st day of August, 2010. CRAIG A. GARGOTTA UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION IN RE: ' CASE NO. 09-12799-CAG
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 14-2052 IN RE: EDWARD J. PAJIAN, Debtor-Appellant. Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
More information