Washington State EHR Incentive Program WHITE PAPER #1: EP Patient Volume Calculations Created April 2011; Updated March 2012



Similar documents
Medicaid EHR Incentive Frequently Asked Questions

Virginia Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Overview

MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD INCENTIVE PROGAM. Requirements

Hospital-Based Provider A provider who furnishes 90% or more of their services in a hospital setting (inpatient, outpatient, or emergency room).

Provider User Manual. January 18, 2011 Version 1.4

MEDICAID EHR INCENTIVES PROGRAM Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) For Eligible Professionals

S.C. Medicaid EHR Incentive Program 2012 SC Health Information Exchange & Health Information Technology Summit

Idaho Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Acronyms and Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

Wyoming. Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 User Manual for Program Year April 2015 Version 1

Frequently Asked Questions: Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Payment Program

Provider Incentive Payment Program (PIPP) User Manual Full Version

MaineCare Electronic Health Information Technology Incentive Payment Program. August 11, 2011 Webinar

Medicaid Questions on the CMS EHR Incentive Program Final Rule

Eligible Professionals User Guide for the Georgia Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Eligibility: Patient Volume & Practicing Predominantly

ARIZONA MEDICAID EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM

Health Information Technology (MHIT) FQHC/RHC/IHS & Tribal 638 Meeting. Karen Hale, Business Analyst Lisa Parker, Sr. Business Analyst August 4, 2011

Meaningful Use: FAQs for Providers

Eligible Professionals

CMS FINALIZES REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) INCENTIVE PROGRAM

Basis and Purpose Definitions Application Eligibility... 11

Iowa Medicaid Health Information Technology (HIT) and Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Payment Program for Eligible Professionals

ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Human Services Department (HSD). [ NMAC - N, ]

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) For Eligible Professionals

Eligible Professional s Guide to the Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program 2015

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Provider User Manual. February 2014 Version 3.1

EHR Incentive Program Final Rule: Medicaid Provisions

HP Provider Enrollment EHR Unit. Indiana Electronic Health Records Incentive Program

Working Together With MassHealth. Presented by Tarsha Weaver MeHI Medicaid Operations Director September 26, 2011

PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL ASSISTANCE EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONAL PROVIDER MANUAL

EHR Medicaid Incentive Payment Program Toolkit February 1, 2016

What Does this mean for Physicians, NPs, CNMs and PAs working in RHCs?

Registration & Attestation For WV Medicaid EHR Incentive. Medicaid Professionals August 8, 2011

Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Attestation Manual

An Overview of Meaningful Use: FAQs

NY Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Eligible Professionals Program Eligibility and AIU Webinar

Technical Assistance 1. Question: What if the question I ask is not listed in CPCA s FAQ?

Texas Medicaid EHR Incentive Program: Dentists

JULY 2010 FINAL RULE. Medicare & Medicaid Programs Electronic Health Record Incentive Program as it Applies to Physicians

Nebraska Medicaid. Record (EHR) Incentive Program

Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program FAQ

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL ASSISTANCE EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONAL PROVIDER MANUAL

Medicare and Medicaid Programs; EHR Incentive Programs

Louisiana Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Tyler N. Carruth Medicaid Management Information Systems

Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program FAQ

NY State Medicaid Meaningful Use Registration & Attestation

EHR Incentive Payments Medicare and Medicaid Indiana

MEANINGFUL USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS: MEDICARE AND MEDICAID INCENTIVE PAYMENTS

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Texas Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Facts and Myths of Meaningful Use

EHR Meaningful Use Incentives for School-Based Health Clinics

West Virginia Provider Incentive Program Eligible Provider EHR Incentive Program Application Manual

EHR Incentive Program FAQs posted on the CMS website as of 10/15/2013

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Eligibility Verification Checklist - 1 -

Washington State Medicaid EHR Incentive Program (emipp)

NY Medicaid. EHR Incentive Program

TennCare/Medicaid EHR Provider Incentive Program

KANSAS MEDICAID EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONAL PROVIDER MANUAL

The Road to Meaningful Use EHR Stimulus Payments. By Amy S. Leopard, Walter & Haverfield LLP

Medicaid and Medicare Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records Program. May 15, 2013

Facts and Myths of Meaningful Use

ARRA, HITECH Act, and Meaningful Use

State of Oklahoma Oklahoma Health Care Authority. Oklahoma Electronic Health Records Incentive Program Provider Manual

Information for Eligible Professionals Regarding Program Year 2015 of the Wisconsin Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

Frequently Asked Questions

Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

CMS EHR Incentive Programs

Meaningful Use & Patient Centered Medical Home

Frequently Asked Questions

THE EMR EXPRESS WHAT IS MEANINGFUL USE AND WHY MEANINGFUL USE INTERIM RULES SUMMARY DOES EVERYONE KEEP TALKING ABOUT IT?

FAQ s Eligible Professionals (EP) Colorado Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Program Year 2013

Wyoming. Eligible Hospitals Meaningful Use Stage 1 User Manual. March 20, 2014 Version 3

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON THE FINAL DEFINITION FOR MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRS IT Strategy Council, Advisory Board Company, Released August 19, 2010.

State of Hawai`i Department of Human Services Med-QUEST Division. Hawai`i Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Provider Manual

Eligible Professional s Checklist 2015 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use

Washington State Medicaid EHR Incentive Program (emipp)

State Level Registration for Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. - Professionals -

The Medicaid EHR Incentive Program: Overview, Program Integrity & Compliance

NEW HAMPSHIRE MEDICAID EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM

Stage 2 Meaningful Use

KANSAS MEDICAID EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM ELIGIBLE HOSPITAL PROVIDER MANUAL

Frequently Asked Questions

Summary of Health Information Technology Incentives and Resources

EHR Adoption Metric FAQ

MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA) MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) ADVANCING CARE INFORMATION PERFORMANCE CATEGORY

Maryland Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program Registration and Attestation System. Provider User Guide. Version 3

EHR Incentive Funding for Medicare and Medicaid

INCENTIVES FOR ADOPTION OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS UNDER THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT

Alaska Department of Health and Social Services Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program

Iowa Medicaid and Health Information Technology. Annual Training 2011

Table of Contents. Program Requirements Payment Questions for Medicaid EHR Incentive Program EPs Meaningful Use Questions

Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) and the NC Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

Presentation to the Legislative Health and Human Services Committee. Julie Weinberg, Deputy Director HSD, Medical Assistance Division

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES

EHR Incentive Program & Meaningful Use

Transcription:

Washington State EHR Incentive Program WHITE PAPER #1: EP Patient Volume Calculations Created April 2011; Updated March 2012 INTRODUCTION: Each year of participation, a Medicaid provider must meet patient volume requirements, as follows: Entity Type Minimum 90-day Medicaid Patient Volume Threshold Or the Medicaid EP Physicians 30% practices Pediatricians 20% predominantly in an Dentists 30% FQHC or RHC, with Certified Nurse Midwives 30% 30% needy Physician Assistants (PAs) practicing individual patient 30% at an FQHC/RHC led a PA volume threshold Nurse Practitioner 30% Acute Care Hospital 10% N/A Children s Hospital No Patient Volume Requirement N/A Per 495.306 and the discussion in the final rule Section II.D.3.d, from pages 44486 to 44491, patient volume is calculated dividing the number of Medicaid encounters during any representative and continuous 90-day period in the preceding calendar year the total number of encounters in that same period. In other words, patient volume is a percentage derived from a fraction with a numerator of Medicaid encounters and a denominator of total encounters. CMS does not believe the tracking of encounters to establish patient volume should be impossible or onerous for providers, seeing as [they] are businesses and there is an expectation that they are tracking their receivables from all entities (including Medicaid) associated with specific patients. That said, CMS also indicates that determining patient volume is not an exact science: We expect providers and States to make estimation in accordance with the methodologies we established here. The estimation would need to be made with reasonable effort, using verifiable data sources the provider and the State. With benchmark data and averages, the State will know only what is reasonable for the denominator value of any given practice. The State will assume that the total encounter (denominator) numbers submitted during application is supported reasonably accurate business data, which can be requested, submitted and reviewed in the event of an audit. From its ProviderOne MMIS system, the State has much more information regarding numerator values, which will be used to validate the numbers submitted participants when they complete their online state application. For purposes of calculating patient volume, only Medicaid (Title XIX) encounters may be counted; CHIP (Title XXI), or encounters funded through other State programs, cannot be included. We realize practices cannot always distinguish between these different funding sources. To overcome this complication, the State is providing a multiplier calculated from statewide data that deducts an estimation of non-medicaid encounters from the general medical assistance totals of the practice. For more information in this regard, please go to the application worksheets at the EHR Incentive Program website.

WHITE PAPER #1: EP Patient Volume Calculations Page 2 DETAILS & COMPONENTS: What is an encounter? Patient volume calculations depend upon the definition of encounter. How CMS intends the word and concept to be understood is discussed in the Final Rule, Section II.D.3.d, pages 44486 through 44491, where a Medicaid encounter is defined as: Services rendered on any one day to an individual where Medicaid or a Medicaid demonstration project under section 1115 of the Act paid for part or all of the service; or Services rendered on any one day to an individual for where Medicaid or a Medicaid demonstration project under section 1115 of the Act paid all or part of their premiums, copayments, and/or cost-sharing. Encounter under Managed Care or similar structure with capitation or case assignment CMS also allows a calculation meant to capture Medicaid enrollees assigned to an EP s panel within the 90-day period, while also accounting for additional unduplicated Medicaid encounters with patients not on the EP s panel. This calculation is as follows: Numerator = the total Medicaid patients assigned to the EP s panel when at least one Medicaid encounter took place with the Medicaid patient in the year prior to the 90-day period, PLUS any unduplicated Medicaid encounters with non-panel patients that occurred within the 90-day period. Denominator = the total patients assigned to the provider in the same 90-day period with at least one encounter occurring with the patient during the year prior to the 90-day period, PLUS all unduplicated non-panel encounters occurring within that 90-day period. Group Practices CMS is allowing practice- or clinic-level patient volume data as a proxy to establish patient volume, which applies to both Medicaid and needy individual patient volume calculations (see below), but only under the five conditions listed in 495.306(h): The clinic or group practice s patient volume is appropriate as a patient volume methodology calculation for the EP There is an auditable data source supporting the clinic s or group practice s patient volume All EPs in the group practice or clinic must use the same methodology for the payment year The clinic or group practice uses the entire practice or clinic s patient volume and does not limit patient volume in any way If an EP works inside and outside of the clinic or practice, then the patient volume calculation includes only those encounters associated with the clinic or group practice, and not the EP s outside encounters. Although the patient volume for the entire practice is used (including patient encounters with non-eps), if the proxy calculation results in 30% Medicaid patient volume, only EPs who see Medicaid patients would be eligible for an incentive payment (see additional information regarding EPs in FQHCs and RHCs, below).

DETAILS & COMPONENTS continued: WHITE PAPER #1: EP Patient Volume Calculations Page 3 Group Practices continued: What is a group? o According to CMS, State interpretations of the rule should not result, in the aggregate, in fewer providers becoming eligible, a principle that encourages liberal definitions of clinic, group, and practice. o In Washington State, so long as all five conditions in 495.306(h) are met, a group is any consistent, coherent, and reasonable association of EPs who are part of the same healthcare organization, including: The entire organization A subset of the entire organization, like a physical practice site, or the EPs in one city or county or region Most other logical and consistent divisions of EP staff, such as: Dentists, whose encounters may be tracked separately Other specialist groups Other logical alignments, upon approval the State program What is NOT a group? o Random EPs from multiple practice sites, associated only for the purpose of calculating a qualifying patient volume threshold o EPs associated into groups according to inconsistent rationale: site here, specialty there, and region somewhere else o Associations that fluctuate and migrate from one payment year to the next FQHCs and RHCs EPs who provide over 50% of their services in an FQHC or RHC during a six month period are the only EPs who can meet their patient volume threshold using needy individual encounters with non-medicaid patients. For these EPs, a needy patient encounter means services rendered to an individual on any one day where: Medicaid or CHIP (or a Medicaid or CHIP demonstration project approved under section 1115 of the Act) paid for part or all of the service, or paid all or part of the individual s premiums, copayments, or cost-sharing; The services were furnished at no cost; and calculated consistent with 495.310(h); or The services were paid for at a reduced cost based on a sliding scale determined the individual s ability to pay. FQHC/RHC Fee-for-Service: Numerator = the EP s total number of needy individual patient encounters, per above description, in any representative and continuous 90-day period in the preceding calendar year Denominator = all patient encounters for the same EP over the same representative and continuous 90-day period

DETAILS & COMPONENTS continued: FQHCs and RHCs continued: WHITE PAPER #1: EP Patient Volume Calculations Page 4 FQHC/RHC Managed Care: Numerator = The total (Needy Individual) patients assigned to the provider in any representative continuous 90-day period in the preceding calendar year, with at least one encounter taking place during the year preceding the 90-day period, plus the unduplicated needy individual encounters in the same 90-day period Denominator = The total patients assigned to the provider in that same 90-day period, with at least one encounter taking place during the year preceding the 90-day period plus all unduplicated encounters in the same 90-day period For purposes of calculating needy individual volume, Basic Health clients do not qualify. Border Areas The EHR Final Rule Section II.D.4.g (pages 44502-03) discusses multi-state practices in border areas where it may impact patient volume calculations. CMS is not prescriptive in this regard and allows for aggregating encounters across states, allowing flexibility to affected EPs. The Washington, Idaho and Oregon EHR programs are collaborating to establish appropriate datasharing relationships for purposes of validating Medicaid volume tallies across borders. Retaining an Audit Trail All patient volume data and calculations should be supported and documented, for two reasons: first, to be fully prepared for an audit, and second, to identify the specific data sources and document the processes which patient volume was determined. Patient volume thresholds must be established in each year of participation. Federal Regulation: 495.306 Establishing Patient Volume (a) General rule. A Medicaid provider must annually meet patient volume requirements of 495.304, as these requirements are established through the State s SMHP in accordance with the remainder of this section. (b) State option(s) through SMHP. A State must submit through the SMHP the option or options it has selected for measuring patient volume. A State must select the methodology described in either paragraph (c) or paragraph (d) of section (or both methodologies). In addition, or as an alternative, a State may select the methodology described in paragraph (g) of this section. (c) Methodology, patient encounter. (1) EPs. To calculate Medicaid patient volume, an EP must divide: (i) The total Medicaid patient encounters in any representative, continuous 90-day period in the preceding calendar year; (ii) The total patient encounters in the same 90-day period. (2) Eligible hospitals. To calculate Medicaid patient volume, an eligible hospital must divide (i) The total Medicaid encounters in any representative, continuous 90-day period in the preceding fiscal year; (ii) The total encounters in the same 90-day period.

WHITE PAPER #1: EP Patient Volume Calculations Page 5 Federal Regulation: 495.306 Establishing Patient Volume continued (3) Needy individual patient volume. To calculate needy individual patient volume, an EP must divide (i) The total needy individual patient encounters in any representative, continuous 90-day period in the preceding calendar year; (ii) The total patient encounters in the same 90-day period. (d) Methodology, patient panel. (1) EPs. To calculate Medicaid patient volume, an EP must divide: (i) (A) The total Medicaid patients assigned to the EP s panel in any representative, continuous 90-day period in the preceding calendar year when at least one Medicaid encounter took place with the Medicaid patient in the year prior to the 90-day period; plus (B) Unduplicated Medicaid encounters in the same 90-day period; (ii)(a) The total patients assigned to the provider in that same 90-day period with at least one encounter taking place with the patient during the year prior to the 90-day period; plus (B) All unduplicated patient encounters in the same 90-day period. (2) Needy individual patient volume. To calculate needy individual patient volume an EP must divide (i)(a) The total Needy Individual patients assigned to the EP s panel in any representative, continuous 90-day period in the preceding calendar year when at least one Needy Individual encounter took place with the Medicaid patient in the year prior to the 90-day period; plus (B) Unduplicated Needy Individual encounters in the same 90-day period, (ii)(a) The total patients assigned to the provider in that same 90-day period with at least one encounter taking place with the patient during the year prior to the 90-day period, plus (B) All unduplicated patient encounters in the same 90-day period. WHITE PAPER #1: EP Patient Volume Calculations Page 6 Federal Regulation: 495.306 Establishing Patient Volume continued (f) Exception. A children s hospital is not required to meet Medicaid patient volume requirements. (g) Establishing an alternative methodology. A State may submit to CMS for review and approval through the SMHP an alternative from the options included in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, so long as it meets the following requirements: (1) It is submitted consistent with all rules governing the SMHP at 495.332. (2) Has an auditable data source. (3) Has received input from the relevant stakeholder group. (4) It does not result, in the aggregate, in fewer providers becoming eligible than the methodologies in either paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section. (h) Group practices. Clinics or group practices will be permitted to calculate patient volume at the group practice/ clinic level, but only in accordance with all of the following limitations: (1) The clinic or group practice s patient volume is appropriate as a patient volume methodology calculation for the EP. (2) There is an auditable data source to support the clinic s or group practice s patient volume determination. (3) All EPs in the group practice or clinic must use the same methodology for the payment year. (4) The clinic or group practice uses the entire practice or clinic s patient volume and does not limit patient volume in any way. (5) If an EP works inside and outside of the clinic or practice, then the patient volume calculation includes only those encounters associated with the clinic or group practice, and not the EP s outside encounters.

Further Information: Any further questions regarding patient volume calculations or other issues concerning the EHR Incentive Program in Washington State, please contact HealthIT@dshs.wa.gov. This White Paper will be updated periodically, as needed.