) ) ) SENATE S. NO; 2_8_0_' Introduced by Senator Antonio "Sonny" F. Trillanes IV. Explanatory Note



Similar documents
SENATE SPONSORSHIP. Bill Summary

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE ORDINANCE NO.

IC ARTICLE 20. ANIMAL CONTROL

NC General Statutes - Chapter 67 1

HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY BY-LAW NUMBER D-100 RESPECTING THE REGISTRATION AND REGULATION OF DOGS

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE BY-LAW

SENAlJO S.B. No INTRODUCED BY SEN. MANNY VILLAR EXPLANATORY NOTE

City of Easthampton, Massachusetts City Ordinance CHAPTER 11. DOGS

) ) ) SENATE EXPLANATORY NOTE

STRICT LIABILITY VS. THE ONE BITE RULE

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION LAW

Chapter No. 765] PUBLIC ACTS, CHAPTER NO. 765 HOUSE BILL NO By Representatives West, Marrero. Substituted for: Senate Bill No.

ARTICLE XVII REGULATION OF DOGS

CITY OF ST. CATHARINES Q5-302 BY-LAW NO. A By-law to provide for the licensing and regulating the keeping of

By-law Number Date Passed: Section(s) Amended: June 27, 2011 Section 1(amended) Section 4 (replaced)

CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW ANIMAL LICENSING AND CONTROL BYLAW (CONSOLIDATED ON JANUARY 1, 2014)

Indiana State Law pertaining to Animals: IC ARTICLE 20. ANIMAL CONTROL IC Chapter 1. Liability for Dog Bites

ORDINANCE NO

DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1.Terms. For the purpose of sections to , the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them.

Case 2:08-cv BMS Document 17 Filed 08/04/09 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM

(b) Safeguard and protect property of Taylor County citizens,

AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO.

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO Surrey Dog Responsibility By-law, 1999, No

Legal Liability in Recreation Site Management. Legal Climate. Classification of Legal Liability RRT 484. Professor Ed Krumpe

EXHIBIT A. The Jefferson County Code is amended as follows: Chapter 6.04 DOGS

Case 1:07-cv MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

B. Immunization. No license or tag for a dog shall be

Williamson County, Texas Regulations for the Control Of Rabies & Animal Control Contact Telephone Number: (512)

WOOSTER S DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMAL ORDINANCE

SENATE. S. No. 3 EXPLANATORY NOTE

MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS

Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, Office Consolidation

The Jefferson County Board of Supervisors does ordain as follows:

CITY of NOVI CITY COUNCIL

OFFICE CONSOLIDATION Dog Control By-law

Animal Control Ordinance

Protection from Harassment Bill

BYLAW BEING A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF OKOTOKS IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA FOR THE PURPOSE OF REDUCING FALSE ALARMS

Defendant has a duty to act as a reasonable person would in like or similar circumstances to avoid causing unreasonable risk of harm to others.

BILL NO nd Session, 62nd General Assembly Nova Scotia 63 Elizabeth II, An Act Respecting the Limitation of Actions

A Guide to Employer Liability in Maryland: Principles of Agency and Negligent Hiring

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

THAT S NOT MY DOG An overview of dog liability in British Columbia

ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS KEEPING OF CERTAIN ANIMALS AS CONSTITUTING PUBLIC NUISANCE ANIMALS AT LARGE ON PUBLIC PROPERTY

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A Faron L. Clark, Respondent, vs. Sheri Connor, et al., Defendants, Vydell Jones, Appellant.

ILLINOIS LAW MANUAL CHAPTER IV STATUTORY CAUSES OF ACTION. The Illinois legislature has broadened the common law liability of owners and

MEMORANDUM. 1.) Under Michigan s dog bite statute, is a young girl considered lawfully on the property

Personal Injury Laws

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, ordains as follows:

SENATE S. No Introduced by Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago. The Philippine National Police (PNP) acknowledges the usefulness of closed circuit

Injury Law Attorney - Dog Bite Clearwater - New Port Richey - Tampa Bay

Number 35 of 2007 PERSONAL INJURIES ASSESSMENT BOARD (AMENDMENT) ACT 2007 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

SENATE EXPLANATORY NOTE

ORDINANCE NO. 2OO8-12

B: It turns over garbage cans or waste containers, or otherwise causes garbage or waste to be scattered on property other than its owners;

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

LOCAL LAW BE ENACTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK AS FOLLOWS:

LAW OF DAMAGES AND REMEDIES. DIFC LAW No. 7 of 2005

PITT COUNTY DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE

LIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT

Chapter 7 Tort Law and Product Liability

CASE NO.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF S NAME], by and through her parent and natural guardian

Chapter 8-9 DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

Office Consolidation Dog By-law

Anglo-American Contract and Torts. Prof. Mark P. Gergen. 14. Strict liability abnormally dangerous activities and vicarious liability

SHERBURNE COUNTY. Ordinance Number 150 AN ORDINANCE FOR DANGEROUS AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS IN SHERBURNE COUNTY

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BELLEVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 3-1 REGARDING FALSE ALARMS.

CHAPTER OPERATION OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ALARM SYSTEMS

THE COUNTY OF EMMET ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE NUMBER 79-15

13 SB 61/AP A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

ARTICLE II. - FIRE AND SECURITY ALARMS [7]

B Y - L A W N U M B E R Passed the 27th day of September, 2004.

ORDINANCE NO

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREY HIGHLANDS BY-LAW NUMBER

SENATE. Senate Bill No. 1 B? 4 INTRODUCED BY SEN. JINGGOY EJERCITO ESTRADA EXPLANATORY NOTE

USING CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAW TO DEAL WITH ORGANISED RACIST ACTIVITY

CHAPTER 90 ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS. Enforcement agents; responsibility of owners

DOG CONTROL BYLAW EFFECTIVE JUNE 21, 1995 AMENDED JULY 28, 2005 AMENDED JANUARY 10, Summary of Bylaw Amendments at end of Bylaw

Introduced by Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago EXPLANATORY NOTE. The Constitution, Article 13, Section 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 provide:

DOG LAW OF 1919 Act 339 of The People of the State of Michigan enact:

Transcription:

FIFTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES First Regular Session SENATE S. NO; 2_8_0_' Introduced by Senator Antonio "Sonny" F. Trillanes IV ~! Explanatory Note In the Philippines, it is estimated that there are about 17,065 people who are bitten by dogs annually.l Unfortunately, there is no accurate report for dog bite cases as most cases neither go reported nor properly treated in hospitals. In a data available at Dumaguete City, the city veterinary office (CVO has recorded a total ofl05 dog bite cases in the first seven (7 months of 2008. According to the CVO, the said figures are based only on the dog bite cases that were reported in their office. More alarmingly, according to a report published by Inquirer2, there is consistent evidence that between 0 and 60 percent of all victims of dog bites are children under fifteen (15 years of age. This bill first provides that, when any person owns or keeps a vicious or dangerous dog of any kind and, as a result of his or her careless management or allowing the dog to go at liberty, and another person, without fault is injured, such owner shall be liable in damages for such injury. If any dog shall, without provocation, bite or injure any person who is at the time at a place where he or she has a legal right to be, the owner of such dog shall be liable in damages to the person so bitten or injured. This apparent strict liability has a mitigation provision that states that the owner of such dog shall be entitled to plead and prove in mitigation of damages that he had no knowledge of any circumstances indicating such dog to be or to have been vicious or dangerous. If an owner, however, is aware that his or her dog is rabid at the time of the bite, he or she shall be liable for twice the damages sustained. In view ~fthe foregoing, the passage ofthis bill is earnestly sought. ~ - A~NNY" F. TRILLANES IV Senator 1 http://www.wl.ongdi.mllosis.com/d/dogbite/stats-country.htm. Infonnation retrieved on November 17, 2008 2 hth:/ishowbizandstyle.inquircr.net/lifcstyie/iitestyie/view article.php?articlc id=127041. Infonnation retrieved on November 18,2008. I

FIFTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES First Regular Session SENATE 280 S.NO. Introduced by Senator Antonio "Sonny" F. Trillanes IV AN ACT RELATING TO THE LIABILITY OF OWNERS OF DOGS BITING OR INJURING PERSONS Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress assembled: 1 SECTION 1. Short Title. - This Act maybe cited as the "Dog Bite Law 0[2010". 2 SEC. 2. Definition. As used in this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, "owner" means a person who, at the time of the offense, regularly harbors, keeps or exercises control over 4 the dog, but does not include a person who, at the time of the offense, is temporarily harboring, 5 keeping or exercising control over the dog. 6 SEC.. Liability of owner of dog for injuries to person bitten or injured while upon 7 property owned or controlled by owner, etc.- If any dog shall, without provocation, bite or injure 8 any person who is at the time at a place where he or she has a legal right to be, the owner of such 9 dog shall be liable in damages to the person so bitten or injured, but such liability shall arise only 10 when the person so bitten or injured is upon property owned or controlled by the owner of such 11 dog at the time such bite or injury occurs or when such person has been immediately prior to 12 such time on such property and has been pursued therefrom by such dog. 1 SEC. 4. When person deemed lawfully on property of owner of dog. - For the purpose 14 ofthis Act, a person shall be considered to be lawfully upon the private property of the owner of 15 such dog when he is on such property in the performance of any duty imposed upon him by the I

1 laws of this land or the local government ordinances and regulations of the Philippines, when 2 reading meters, when making repairs to any public utility or service upon said premises or when on such property upon the invitation, either expressed or implied, of the owner or lessee of such 4 property. 5 SEC. 5. Liability Of owner of dog for injuries to person bitten or injured while upon 6 other persoll 's property or a place opell to the gelleral public. - The owner of a dog commits an 7 offense if that dog goes uncontrolled by the owner upon the premises of another without the 8 consent of the owner of the premises or other person authorized to give consent, or goes 9 uncontrolled by the owner upon a highway, public road, street or any other place open to the 10 public generally. 11 SEC. 6. Exceptiolls. - It is an exception to the application ofthis Act if: 12 (1 The dog was on a hunt or chase; 1 (2 The dog was on the way to or from a hunt or chase; 14 ( The dog was guarding or driving stock or on the way to guard or drive stock; 15 (4 The dog was being moved from one place to another by the owner ofthe dog; 16 (5 The dog is a police or military dog, the injury occurred during the course of the dog's official 17 duties and the person injured was a party to, a participant in or suspected of being a party to or 18 participant in the act or conduct that prompted the police or military to utilize the services of the 19 dog; 20 (6 The violation of Section 5 occurred while the injured person was on the private property of 21 the dog's owner with the intent to engage in unlawful activity while on the property; 22 (7 The violation of Section 5 occurred while the dog was protecting the dog's owner or other 2 innocent party from attack by the injured person or an animal owned by the injured person; 24 (8 The violation of Section 5 occurred while the dog was securely confmed in a kelmel, crate or 25 other enclosure; or 2

1 (9 The violation of Section 5 occurred as a result of the injured person disturbing, harassing, 2 assaulting or otherwise provoking the dog. 4 SEC. 7. Injury caused by dogs; civilliabilify; exceptions; limitation~~ - 5 (1 (a The owner of a dog has a duty to keep that dog under reasonable control at all times, 6 and to keep that dog from running at large. A person who breaches that duty is subject to 7 civil liability, as provided in Article 218 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, for any 8 damages suffered by a person who is injured by the dog while in a public place or 9 lawfully in or on the private property of another. 10 (b Such a person may be held liable regardless of whether the dog has shown any 11 dangerous propensities or whether the dog's owner knew or should have known of the 12 dog's dangerous propensities. 1 (2 The provisions of Section (7(1 shall not be construed to impose liability upon the owner of 14 the dog if: 15 (a The dog is a police or military dog, the injury occurred during the course of the dog's 16 official duties and the person injured was a party to, a participant in or suspected ofbeing 17 a party to or participant in the act or conduct that prompted the po lice or military to 18 utilize the services of the dog; 19 (b The injured person was trespassing upon the private, nonresidential property of the 20 dog's owner; 21 (c The injury occurred while the dog was protecting the dog's owner or other innocent 22 party from attack by the injured person or a dog owned by the injured person; 2 (d The injury occurred while the dog was securely confmed in a kennel, crate or other 24 enclosure; or 25 (e The injury occurred as a result of the injured person enticing, disturbing, alarming, 26 harassing, or otherwise provoking the dog.

1 ( 2 4 5 6 If a dog causes damage to a person while the person is on residential, farm or other noncommercial property, and the dog's owner is the owner of the property, or is on such property by permission of the owner or as a lawful tenant or lessee, in any civil action based upon such damages brought against the owner of the dog, the claimant shall be required to establish that the dog's owner knew or should have known of the dog's dangerous propensities. 7 8 SEC. 8. Mitigation of damages. - The owner of such dog shall, however, be entitled to 9 plead and prove in mitigation of damages that he had no knowledge of any circumstances 10 indicating such dog to be or to have been vicious or dangerous or mischievous, and, if he does 11 so, he shall be liable only to the extent of the actual expenses incurred by the person so bitten or 12 injured as a result of the bite or injury. 1 14 SEC. 9. Repealing Clause.- Any laws, decrees, ordinances or rules and regulations 15 which are inconsistent with or contrary to the provision of this Act is hereby amended or 16 repealed. 17 18 SEC. 10. Effectivity.- This Act shall take effect fifteen (15 days after its complete 19 publication in at least two (2 national newspapers of general circulation. Approved, 4