WOOSTER S DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMAL ORDINANCE
|
|
|
- Lesley McCormick
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Robert F. Breneman Mayor Richard R. Benson, Jr. Director of Law Phone (330) Fax: (330) CITY OF WOOSTER Law Department 538 N. Market Street * P.O. Box 1128 Wooster, Ohio WOOSTER S DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMAL ORDINANCE DEFINITIONS. As used in this chapter unless otherwise specifically provided herein: (a) (1) "Dangerous dog" means a dog that, without provocation, and subject to subsection (a)(2) hereof has done any of the following: A. Caused injury, other than killing or serious injury, to any person; B. Killed another dog; C. Been the subject of a third or subsequent violation of Section 505.0l(c). (2) "Dangerous dog" does not include a police dog that has caused injury, other than killing or serious injury, to any person or has killed another dog while the police dog is being used to assist one or more law enforcement officers in the performance of their official duties. (b) "Menacing fashion" means that a dog would cause any person being chased or approached to reasonably believe that the dog will cause physical injury to that person. (c) (1) Subject to subsection (c)(2) hereof, "nuisance dog" means a dog that without provocation and while off the premises of its owner, keeper or harborer has chased or approached a person in either a menacing fashion or an apparent attitude of attack or has attempted to bite or otherwise endanger any person. (2) "Nuisance dog" does not include a police dog that while being used to assist one or more law enforcement officers in the performance of official duties has chased or approached a person in either a menacing fashion or an apparent attitude of attack or has attempted to bite or otherwise endanger any person. (d) "Police dog" means a dog that has been trained, and may be used, to assist one or more law enforcement officers in the performance of their official duties. (e) "Serious injury" means any of the following: (1) Any physical harm that carries a substantial risk of death; (2) Any physical harm that involves a permanent incapacity, whether partial or total, or a temporary, substantial incapacity;
2 (3) Any physical harm that involves a permanent disfigurement or a temporary, serious disfigurement; (4) Any physical harm that involves acute pain of a duration that results in substantial suffering or any degree of prolonged or intractable pain. (f) (1) "Vicious dog" means a dog that, without provocation and subject to subsection (f)(2) hereof has killed or caused serious injury to any person. (2) "Vicious dog" does not include either of the following: A. A police dog that has killed or caused serious injury to any person while the police dog is being used to assist one or more law enforcement officers in the performance of their official duties; B. A dog that has killed or caused serious injury to any person while a person was committing or attempting to commit a trespass or other criminal offense on the property of the owner, keeper or harborer of the dog. (g) "Without provocation" means that a dog was not teased, tormented or abused by a person, or that the dog was not coming to the aid or the defense of a person who was not engaged in illegal or criminal activity and who was not using the dog as a means of carrying out such activity. (ORC 9SS.11) DOGS AND OTHER ANIMALS RUNNING AT LARGE. [Replaces Existing Section ] (a) No person being the owner or having charge of cattle, horses, swine, sheep, geese, ducks, goats, turkeys, chickens or other fowl or animals shall permit them to run at large upon any public place, or upon any unenclosed lands or upon the premises of another. (ORC ) (b) No owner, keeper or harborer of any female dog shall permit it to go beyond the premises of the owner, keeper or harborer at any time the dog is in heat, unless the dog is properly in leash. (c) No owner, keeper, or harborer of any dog shall fail at any time to do either of the following : (1) Keep the dog physically confined or restrained upon the premises of the owner, keeper, or harborer by a leash, tether, adequate fence, supervision, or secure enclosure to prevent escape. (2) Keep the dog under the reasonable control of some person. (ORC ) (d) The running at large of any such animal in or upon any of the places mentioned in this section is prima-facie evidence that it is running at large in violation of this section. (ORC ) (e) (1) Whoever violates subsection (a) hereof is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. (ORC ) (2) A. Whoever violates subsection (b) hereof is guilty of a minor misdemeanor for a first offense and a misdemeanor of the fourth degree for each subsequent offense.
3 B. In addition to the penalties prescribed in subsection (e)(2)a. hereof, if the offender is guilty of a violation of subsection (b) hereof, the court may order the offender to personally supervise the dog that the offender owns, keeps or harbors, to cause that dog to complete dog obedience training, or to do both. (3) A. 1. Whoever violates subsection (c) hereof that involves a dog that is not a nuisance dog, dangerous dog or vicious dog is guilty of a minor misdemeanor for a first offense and a misdemeanor of the fourth degree for each subsequent offense. 2. In addition to the penalties prescribed above, if the offender is guilty of a violation of subsection (c) hereof, that involves a dog that is not a nuisance dog, dangerous dog or vicious dog, the court may order the offender to personally supervise the dog that the offender owns, keeps or harbors, to cause that dog to complete dog obedience training, or to do both. B. 1. Whoever commits a violation of subsection (c) hereof, that involves a nuisance dog is guilty of a minor misdemeanor on the first offense and of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree on each subsequent offense involving the same dog. Upon a person being convicted of or pleading guilty to a third violation of subsection (c) hereof, involving the same dog, the court shall require the offender to register the involved dog as a dangerous dog. 2. In addition to the penalties prescribed above, if a violation of subsection (c) hereof involves a nuisance dog, the court may order the offender to personally supervise the nuisance dog that the offender owns, keeps or harbors, to cause that dog to complete obedience training, or to do both. C. Whoever commits a violation of subsection (c) hereof that involves a dangerous dog, is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree on a first offense and of a misdemeanor of the third degree on each subsequent offense. Additionally, the court may order the offender to personally supervise the dangerous dog that the offender owns, keeps or harbors, to cause that dog to complete dog obedience training, or to do both, and the court may order the offender to obtain liability insurance pursuant to division (E) of Ohio R.C The court, in the alternative, may order the dangerous dog to be humanely destroyed by a licensed veterinarian, the County Dog Warden, or the County Humane Society at the owner's expense. With respect to a violation of subsection (c) hereof that involves a dangerous dog, until the court makes a final determination and during the pendency of any appeal of a violation of that division and at the discretion of the Dog Warden, the dog shall be confined or restrained in accordance with division (D) of
4 Ohio R.C or at the County Dog Pound at the owner's expense. D. 1. Whoever commits a violation of subsection (c) hereof that involves a vicious dog is guilty of one or the following: a. A felony, if the dog kills a person, and shall be prosecuted under appropriate State law. Additionally, the court shall order that the vicious dog be humanely destroyed by a licensed veterinarian, the County Dog Warden or the County Humane Society at the owner's expense. b. A misdemeanor of the first degree if the dog causes serious injury to a person. Additionally, the court may order the vicious dog to be humanely destroyed by a licensed veterinarian, the County Dog Warden, or the County Humane Society; 2. If the court does not order the vicious dog to be destroyed under subsection (e)(3)d.l.b. hereof, the court shall issue an order that specifies that division (D) of Ohio R.C and divisions (D) to (1) of Ohio R.C apply with respect to the dog and the owner, keeper or harborer of the dog as if the dog were a dangerous dog and that Ohio R.c applies with respect to the dog as if it were a dangerous dog. As part of the order, the court shall order the offender to obtain the liability insurance required under division (E) (1) of Ohio R.C in an amount, exclusive of interest and costs, that equals or exceeds one hundred thousand dollars. Until the court makes a final determination and during the pendency of any appeal of a violation of subsection (c) hereof and at the discretion of the Dog Warden, the dog shall be confined or restrained in accordance with the provisions described in division (D) of Ohio R.C or at the County Dog Pound at the owner's expense. (ORC ) DANGEROUS DOGS. [Replaces Existing Section ] (a) Except when a dangerous dog is lawfully engaged in hunting or training for the purpose of hunting and is accompanied by the owner, keeper, harborer, or handler of the dog, no owner, keeper, or harborer of a dangerous dog shall fail to do either of the following: (1) While such dog is on the premises of the owner, keeper or harborer, securely confine it at all times in a building, in a locked pen that has a top, locked fenced yard or other locked enclosure that has a top;
5 (b) (c) (2) While such dog is off the premises of the owner, keeper or harborer, keep that dog on a chain-link leash or tether that is not more than six feet in length and additionally do at least one of the following : A. Keep such dog in a locked pen that has a top, locked fenced yard or other locked enclosure that has a top; B. Have the leash or tether controlled by a person who is of suitable age and discretion or securely attach, tie or affix the leash or tether to the ground or stationary object or fixture so that the dog is adequately restrained and station such a person in close enough proximity to the dog so as to prevent it from causing injury to any person; C. Muzzle such dog. No owner, keeper or harborer of a dangerous dog shall fail to do the following: (1) Obtain liability insurance with an insurer authorized to write liability insurance in this State providing coverage in each occurrence because of damage or bodily injury to or death of a person caused by the dangerous dog if so ordered by a court and provide proof of that liability insurance upon request to any law enforcement officer, County Dog Warden, or public health official charged with enforcing this section; (2) Obtain a dangerous dog registration certificate from the County Auditor pursuant to Ohio RC (1), affix a tag that identifies the dog as a dangerous dog to the dog's collar, and ensure that the dog wears the collar and tag at all times; (3) Notify the local Dog Warden immediately if any of the following occurs: A. The dog is loose or unconfined. B. The dog bites a person, unless the dog is on the property of the owner of the dog, and the person who is bitten is unlawfully trespassing or committing a criminal act within the boundaries of that property. C. The dog attacks another animal while the dog is off the property of the owner of the dog. (4) If the dog is sold, given to another person, or dies, notify the County Auditor within ten days of the sale, transfer or death. (ORC ) Whoever violates subsection (a) hereof is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree on a first offense and of a misdemeanor of the third degree on each subsequent offense. Additionally, the court may order the offender to personally supervise the dangerous dog that the offender owns, keeps or harbors, to cause that dog to complete dog obedience training, or to do both, and the court may order the offender to obtain liability insurance pursuant to subsection (b) hereof. The court, in the alternative, may order
6 the dangerous dog to be humanely destroyed by a licensed veterinarian, the Dog Warden or the humane society at the owner's expense. (d) (1) Whoever violates subsection (b )(2) hereof is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. (2) Whoever violates subsections (b)(1), (3) or (4) hereof is guilty of a minor misdemeanor. (ORC )
IC 15-20 ARTICLE 20. ANIMAL CONTROL
IC 15-20 ARTICLE 20. ANIMAL CONTROL IC 15-20-1 Chapter 1. Liability for Dog Bites IC 15-20-1-0.2 Repealed (Repealed by P.L.63-2012, SEC.18.) IC 15-20-1-1 Political subdivision powers Sec. 1. This chapter
347.50 DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1.Terms. For the purpose of sections 347.50 to 347.56, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/index.php 347.50 DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1.Terms. For the purpose of sections 347.50 to 347.56, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2.Dangerous
B: It turns over garbage cans or waste containers, or otherwise causes garbage or waste to be scattered on property other than its owners;
TOWN OF SUGAR HILL DOG ORDINANCE Pursuant to the authority conferred by New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated, Chapter 31:39, in order to promote the general welfare of the citizens of the Town of Sugar
NC General Statutes - Chapter 67 1
Chapter 67. Dogs. Article 1. Owner's Liability. 67-1. Liability for injury to livestock or fowls. If any dog, not being at the time on the premises of the owner or person having charge thereof, shall kill
Indiana State Law pertaining to Animals: IC 15-20 ARTICLE 20. ANIMAL CONTROL IC 15-20-1 Chapter 1. Liability for Dog Bites
Indiana State Law pertaining to Animals: IC 15-20 ARTICLE 20. ANIMAL CONTROL IC 15-20-1 Chapter 1. Liability for Dog Bites IC 15-20-1-1 Political subdivision powers Sec. 1. This chapter does not limit
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, ordains as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 771 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 771.1) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 771 CONTROLLING POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND DANGEROUS ANIMALS The Board of Supervisors of the
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE ORDINANCE NO.
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE 10-029-O CITY PROPOSAL: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6, ARTICLE IX, OF THE DULUTH CITY CODE, 1959, AS AMENDED, PERTAINING TO DANGEROUS DOGS. The city of Duluth does
Williamson County, Texas Regulations for the Control Of Rabies & Animal Control Contact Telephone Number: (512) 352-4129
Williamson County, Texas Regulations for the Control Of Rabies & Animal Control Contact Telephone Number: (512) 352-4129 Part I. IN GENERAL Section 1. Authority These regulations are adopted by the Commissioners
ORDINANCE NO. 05-5351
ORDINANCE NO. 05-5351 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BILLINGS, PROVIDING THAT THE BILLINGS, MONTANA, CITY CODE BE AMENDED BY REVISING SECTIONS 4-401, 4-402, 4-404, 4-405, 4-405.7, 4-406, 4-407, 4-409, 4-411,
MUNICIPALITY OF THE COUNTY OF KINGS
For By-Law information contact the Municipal Clerk Tel: (902)690-6133 Fax: (902)678-9279 E-mail: [email protected] BY-LAW # 71A DOG BY-LAW DEFINITIONS 1. In this By-Law: (f) (g) "Corporate
HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY BY-LAW NUMBER D-100 RESPECTING THE REGISTRATION AND REGULATION OF DOGS
HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY BY-LAW NUMBER D-100 RESPECTING THE REGISTRATION AND REGULATION OF DOGS BE IT ENACTED by the Council of the Halifax Regional Municipality as follows: Short Title 1 This By-law
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE BY-LAW 98-211
PAGE 1 OF 7 THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE BY-LAW 98-211 LICENSING: (R.1.2.4.) A by-law for licensing dogs, for requiring the registration of dogs and for prohibiting the running at large
SHERBURNE COUNTY. Ordinance Number 150 AN ORDINANCE FOR DANGEROUS AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS IN SHERBURNE COUNTY
SHERBURNE COUNTY Ordinance Number 150 AN ORDINANCE FOR DANGEROUS AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOGS IN SHERBURNE COUNTY Adopted by the Sherburne County Board of Commissioners on the 10th day of July, 2007.
Chapter 8-9 DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS
Chapter 8-9 DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS Sections: 8-9-1 Definitions 8-9-2 Keeping Of Dangerous Animals Prohibited 8-9-3 Dangerous Animal Exceptions 8-9-4 Seizure, Impoundment And Disposition Of Dangerous
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2015
MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2015 By: Representatives Byrd, Taylor To: Judiciary B HOUSE BILL NO. 1261 AN ACT TO CREATE CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PENALTIES FOR FAILING TO 1 2 KEEP DANGEROUS DOGS SECURELY
B. Immunization. No license or tag for a dog shall be
CITY OF PALMER, ALASKA ORDINANCE NO. 416 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PRLMER MUNICIPAL CODE. CHAPTER 6.04.110 D, RESTRAINT, CHAPTER 6.12, LICENSING, CHAPTER 6.14, DOG BITE AND ATTACK INCIDENTS, CHAPTER 6.16.020,
ARTICLE XVII REGULATION OF DOGS
ARTICLE XVII REGULATION OF DOGS STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This bylaw is intended to guide those persons owning or keeping dogs in their role as responsible pet owners so as not to adversely affect the residents
Animal Control Ordinance
Pender County Health Department Building a healthier tomorrow Animal Control Ordinance Updated 6/7/2010 1 Section 3 ANIMALS Sec. 3-1. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to protect the public health,
EXHIBIT A. The Jefferson County Code is amended as follows: Chapter 6.04 DOGS
EXHIBIT A The Jefferson County Code is amended as follows: 6.04.009E Note to Chapter 6.04 *Prior ordinance history: Ord. O-84-2000. Chapter 6.04 DOGS 6.04.010 Definitions. As used in this chapter the following
How To Control A Dog
TITLE 8: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE : ANIMALS AND ANIMAL PRODUCTS (EXCEPT MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION ACT REGULATIONS) PART 30 ANIMAL CONTROL ACT Section 30.10 Definitions
CHAPTER 90 ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS. Enforcement agents; responsibility of owners
CHAPTER 90 ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS ARTICLE I Dog Control S90-1. S90-2. S90-3. S90-4. S90-5. S90-6. S90-7. Definitions Enforcement agents; responsibility of owners Declaration of nuisance Restraint and Control
Anderson County SC Ordinances pertaining to Animal Control
Anderson County SC Ordinances pertaining to Animal Control DIVISION 4. ANIMALS* *State law references: Animals, livestock and poultry, S.C. Code 1976, Title 47; authority to enact ordinances and promulgate
Livestock. Dogs, Coydogs, Wolfhybrids IC 15-20 ARTICLE 20. ANIMAL CONTROL. IC 15-20-1 Chapter 1. Liability for Dog Bites
Livestock IC 15-17-18-8 Animals running at large Sec. 8. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a person responsible for livestock or poultry who knowingly or intentionally permits the livestock or
I ci H 1 8 L. U e. These regulations shall become effective on January 1, 2014. These rules TETON COUNTY, WYOMING
TETON COUNTY, WYOMING TETON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TETON COUNTY ANIMAL REGULATIONS Chapter 1 Authority 1-1-1 Authority to Promulgate Regulations: a. Wyoming Statute 11-31-301 (LexisNexis
(b) Safeguard and protect property of Taylor County citizens,
Chapter 54 Animal Control Regulations Page 1 of 7 CHAPTER 54 ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS 54.01 PURPOSE. (1) The purpose of this chapter is to: (a) Regulate and control dogs, cats, and other animals within
Animal Ordinances for the City of Columbus, Georgia
Animal Ordinances for the City of Columbus, Georgia If you would like to make a complaint regarding an animal in Muscogee County, please contact our administrative office at: 706.653.4512. The administrative
City of Easthampton, Massachusetts City Ordinance CHAPTER 11. DOGS
City of Easthampton, Massachusetts City Ordinance CHAPTER 11. DOGS Sec. 11-1. License required. Any owner or keeper of a dog six (6) months of age or older in the City of Easthampton shall cause that dog
DOG CONTROL BYLAW EFFECTIVE JUNE 21, 1995 AMENDED JULY 28, 2005 AMENDED JANUARY 10, 2011. Summary of Bylaw Amendments at end of Bylaw
EFFECTIVE JUNE 21, 1995 AMENDED JULY 28, 2005 AMENDED JANUARY 10, 2011 Summary of Bylaw Amendments at end of Bylaw BEING A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTETOWN RELATING TO THE REGISTRATION AND CONTROL OF
Updated on-line 7/26/07
Updated on-line 7/26/07 Lane Code CHAPTER 7 CONTENTS ANIMAL CONTROL 7.005 Animal Control - Definitions. 7.010 Animal Control Code Supercedes State Law. 7.015 Animal Regulation Authority Powers and Duties.
ORDINANCE NO. 2299.2
ORDINANCE NO. 2299.2 AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING DOG AND CAT LICENSING AND REGULATION WHEREAS, the City Council of City of Cudahy finds that a more complete and comprehensive change is needed to create consistency
CITY OF ST. CATHARINES Q5-302 BY-LAW NO. A By-law to provide for the licensing and regulating the keeping of
, {i ~ f r ' ~ ( CITY OF ST. CATHARINES BY-LAW NO. Q5-302 A By-law to provide for the licensing and regulating the keeping of dogs. WHEREAS Section 210, subsection 8 of the Municipal Act, R. S. O. 1990,
Animal Ordinance Loudoun County, Virginia
Animal Ordinance Loudoun County, Virginia LARRY D. YATES, R.E.H.S., CHIEF DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LOUDOUN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH LOCAL (703) 777 0234 METRO 478-8408
Dickinson Municipal Code October 2007 ANIMALS AND FOWL
Chapter 5 Articles: ANIMALS AND FOWL 5.ED Editor's note to Chapter 5 5.02 Definitions 5.04 Animals In General 5.08 Animals 5.12 Other Animals Page 1 of 15 Article 5.ED Editor's note to Chapter 5 Sections:
ORDIANCE 63 DOG CONTROL PAGE 63-2
PAGE 63-1 SUPERIOR TOWNSHIP WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 63 DOG CONTROL ORDINANCE THE TOWNSHIP OF SUPERIOR, COUNTY OF WASHTENAW, STATE OF MICHIGAN, ORDAINS: Section 63-01 Short Title This Ordinance
Winnebago County, Illinois, Code of Ordinances >> - COUNTY CODE >> Chapter 14 - ANIMALS
Winnebago County, Illinois, Code of Ordinances >> - COUNTY CODE >> Chapter 14 - ANIMALS ARTICLE I. - IN GENERAL Sec. 14-1. - Short title. Sec. 14-2. - Purposes of chapter. Sec. 14-3. - Interpretation of
Chapter No. 765] PUBLIC ACTS, 2004 1 CHAPTER NO. 765 HOUSE BILL NO. 3229. By Representatives West, Marrero. Substituted for: Senate Bill No.
Chapter No. 765] PUBLIC ACTS, 2004 1 CHAPTER NO. 765 HOUSE BILL NO. 3229 By Representatives West, Marrero Substituted for: Senate Bill No. 2840 By Senator Cohen AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated,
by a tether of some kind, is not at heel or not a working dog in the field, that dog shall be deemed at large.
Title 6 ANIMALS Chapter 6.04 DOGS 6.04.010 Purpose. 6.04.020 Definitions. 6.04.030 Dog control officers--powers and duties. 6.04.040 Interfering with officers prohibited. 6.04.050 Failing to prevent running
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE #728 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 545; N0W CODIFIED AS CODE OF ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HOWE, CHAPTER 2, ANIMAL CONTROL; REGULATING THE KEEPING OF DOGS AND CATS IN THE CITY OF HOWE, TEXAS
CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW 13145 ANIMAL LICENSING AND CONTROL BYLAW (CONSOLIDATED ON JANUARY 1, 2014)
CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW 13145 ANIMAL LICENSING AND CONTROL BYLAW (CONSOLIDATED ON JANUARY 1, 2014) Bylaw 13145 Page 2 of 20 Table of Contents PART I - PURPOSE, DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION... 4 PURPOSE...4
PITT COUNTY DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE
ANIMAL CONTROL -------------------------- ORDINANCE NO. 3 PITT COUNTY DANGEROUS DOG ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Pitt County Board of Commissioners has received recommendations from the Pitt County Animal Control
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BELLEVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER 2005-206
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BELLEVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER 2005-206 A BY-LAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING, REGULATION AND REGISTRATION OF DOGS, WITHIN THE CITY OF BELLEVILLE WHEREAS the Municipal Act, 2001
By-law Number Date Passed: Section(s) Amended: 6496-11 June 27, 2011 Section 1(amended) Section 4 (replaced)
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF WHITBY Cat and Dog By-law Being a by-law to regulate the keeping of cats and dogs This document has been reproduced for convenience only and is a consolidation of the Cat
BERRIEN COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ENFORCEMENT ORDINANCE. County of Berrien, Michigan
BERRIEN COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ENFORCEMENT ORDINANCE County of Berrien, Michigan AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO AND PROVIDING FOR ANIMAL CONTROL WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF BERRIEN COUNTY; PURPOSE OF ORDINANCE:
WARREN COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
WARREN COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Section I. Warren County Animal Control Department Authority is hereby granted to the Warren County Animal Control Department to establish and maintain an animal
PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
WATAUGA COUNTY ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL ORDINANCE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WATAUGA WATAUGA COUNTY ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL ORDINANCE SECTION I. AGENCY AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY There is hereby created a Department of Animal Care and Control
KNOX COUNTY CODE. Chapter 6 ANIMALS*
KNOX COUNTY CODE Chapter 6 ANIMALS* Article I. In General Secs. 6-1 6-30. Reserved. Article II. Animal Control Division 1. Generally Sec. 6-31. Definitions. Sec. 6-32. Animals at Large. Sec. 6-33. Animals
Office Consolidation Dog By-law 250-2005
Office Consolidation Dog By-law 250-2005 To create a system of different licenses for dogs depending on whether the dog has exhibited menacing behavior, to establish an Animal Control Tribunal of Council,
Gold Coast City Council
Gold Coast City Council Local Law No. 12 (Animal Management) 2013 This and the following 48 pages is a certified copy of Local Law No. 12 (Animal Management) 2013 made, in accordance with the provisions
DOG LAW OF 1919 Act 339 of 1919. The People of the State of Michigan enact:
DOG LAW OF 1919 Act 339 of 1919 AN ACT relating to dogs and the protection of live stock and poultry from damage by dogs; providing for the licensing of dogs; regulating the keeping of dogs, and authorizing
CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO. 13880. Surrey Dog Responsibility By-law, 1999, No. 13880
CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO. 13880 Surrey Dog Responsibility By-law, 1999, No. 13880 As amended by By-law No. 14453, 07/23/01; 15142, 10/27/03; 16488, 12/03/07; 17071, 12/14/09; 17312, 01/10/11; 17558, 02/06/12;
ALLECHANY COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE. Section 1. Definitions: As used in this ordinance the fol1owing terms mean:
ALLECHANY COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Section 1. Definitions: As used in this ordinance the fol1owing terms mean: (a) Owner: Any person, group of persons, firm, partnership or corporation owning, keeping,
OFFICE CONSOLIDATION Dog Control By-law 2006-27
OFFICE CONSOLIDATION The following is an Office Consolidation as of April 19, 2016 that includes all amendments as per the table below. By-law # Description Date Passed 2006-27 Original By-law March 14,
MONTGOMERY COUNTY RABIES CONTROL AND ANIMAL RESTRAINT ORDINANCE
MONTGOMERY COUNTY RABIES CONTROL AND ANIMAL RESTRAINT ORDINANCE SECTION I. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE These rules are promulgated pursuant to and in conformity with statutory authority granted to the Montgomery
Operational BY-LAW N O 493 CONCERNING DOGS
Operational BY-LAW N O 493 CONCERNING DOGS 1. Definitions: "Dog": denotes and includes any male dog, bitch and any canine animal; "Dangerous dog": Any dog that, according to the Municipal Council has:
ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS 4-4.10 KEEPING OF CERTAIN ANIMALS AS CONSTITUTING PUBLIC NUISANCE 4-4.13 ANIMALS AT LARGE ON PUBLIC PROPERTY
ARTICLE 4 ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS Section Subject Matter 4-4.01 DEFINITIONS 4-4.05 ENFORCEMENT 4-4.10 KEEPING OF CERTAIN ANIMALS AS CONSTITUTING PUBLIC NUISANCE 4-4.11 UNNECESSARY NOISES 4-4.12 ABANDONMENT
Vicious or Merely Dangerous? Preparing and Trying the Dog Bite Case
63511 Vicious or Merely Dangerous? Preparing and Trying the Dog Bite Case THIS MATERIAL IS PRESENTED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PUBLISHER AND THE AUTHORS DO NOT RENDER ANY LEGAL, ACCOUNTING OR OTHER
DOG BY LAW NO. 4755 ADOPTED: October 28, 2013
DOG BY LAW NO. 4755 ADOPTED: October 28, 2013 DM#321424 v.10 BY LAW NO. 4755 SHORT TITLE... 2 PURPOSE... 2 INTERPRETATION... 2 LICENCES... 5 KENNELS... 7 GENERAL PROHIBITIONS... 7 PROTECTION OF DOGS...
Model Animal Control Law
Model Animal Control Law Presented by NAIA Preamble This model law is compatible with the NAIA Guide to Pet Friendly Ordinances but is more detailed and is written in more formal language. Like the guidelines,
When A Dog Bites Fight Back
When A Dog Bites Fight Back What you need to know What you need to do What not to do Slater & Zurz LLP Attorneys at Law slaterzurz.com 1-888-534-4850 Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Disclaimer... 7
Ordinance No. 822. Ordinance Rescinding Ordinance 810. Champaign County Animal Control Ordinance
Ordinance No. 822 Ordinance Rescinding Ordinance 810 Champaign County Animal Control Ordinance Section 1. Definitions As used in this article, the following terms shall mean as indicated below: Act: The
Title 8 - ANIMALS* Chapter 8-24 - ENFORCEMENT. Title 8 - ANIMALS* Chapter 8-4 - DEFINITIONS
Chapters: Chapter 8-4 - DEFINITIONS Chapter 8-8 - ANIMALS GENERALLY Chapter 8-12 - MEMPHIS ANIMAL SHELTER Chapter 8-16 - DOGS AND CATS Chapter 8-20 - DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS ANIMALS Title 8 - ANIMALS* Sections:
Dog Law Northern Ireland
DOG LAW NORTHERN IRELAND This information is intended as a guide and is not to be taken as legal advice. If you have a specific query, you should take advice from a specialist Solicitor or contact your
Laws and Regulations Relating to RABIES. Excerpts from the. California Health and Safety Code. and the. California Code of Regulations
Laws and Regulations Relating to RABIES Excerpts from the California Health and Safety Code and the California Code of Regulations CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASE
HARRIS COUNTY ANIMAL REGULATIONS
HARRIS COUNTY ANIMAL REGULATIONS SECTION 1. AUTHORITY A. These Regulations are promulgated pursuant to and in conformity with the following statutory authority: (1) The Rabies Control Act of 1981, specifically
- been placed on an Order to Restrain Animal and is kept or permitted to be kept by its owner in violation of the requirements of such order;
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KAWARTHA LAKES BY-LAW 20',12-209 A BY.LAW TO REGULATE DOGS Recitals 2 3 4 Section 10 of the Municipal Act,2001 authorizes the councils of municipalities to pass bylaws respecting
/ Macoupin County Animal Control Ordinance Index
/ Macoupin County Animal Control Ordinance Index Page 1,2 Index to the Macoupin County Animal Control Ordinance DIVISION I. GENERALLY Page 3 (ACO 1.1) Purpose of Chapter Page 3,4,5 (ACO 1.2)...Definitions
B Y - L A W N U M B E R 245-2004. Passed the 27th day of September, 2004.
Amended B/L 374-2004, Nov. 22/04 Amended B/L 28-2006, Feb. 21/06 Amended B/L 39-2006, Feb. 27/06 Amended B/L 71-2008, Apr. 28/08 Amended B/L 124-2008, July 7/08 Amended B/L 3-2010, January 4/10 Amended
GOVERNING ANIMAL CONTROL
ORDINANCE NO. 2012-6 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 2006-3, AND AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING THESE RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING ANIMAL CONTROL WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has the authority
SMITH COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
SMITH COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE Pursuant to the authority of Chapter 826 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, the Smith County Commissioners Court adopts the following ordinances to protect the public
KALAMAZOO COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ENFORCMENT ORDINANCE COUNTY OF KALAMAZOO, MICHIGAN
KALAMAZOO COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ENFORCMENT ORDINANCE COUNTY OF KALAMAZOO, MICHIGAN An Ordinance relating to and providing for animal control within the boundaries of Kalamazoo County, purpose of the Ordinance;
Chapter 4 ANIMALS* ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS* Animal shall mean every living non-human creature, excluding tropical fish.
Chapter 4 ANIMALS* * Editors Note: Ord. No. 2179, 1--15, adopted Feb. 17, 1999, amended ch. 4 in its entirety to read as set forth in 4-1--4-15. Formerly, ch. 4, 4-1--4-5, pertained to similar subject
Dog Licensing & Control By-law
Dog Licensing & Control By-law PH-4 Consolidated as of November 11, 2014 As Amended by By-law No. Date Passed at Council PH-4-94001 February 21, 1994 PH-4-94002 May 2, 1994 PH-4-96003 April 1, 1996 PH-4-96004
ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, some animal control regulations within the PMC need to be clarified based upon federal and state case law; and
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP amending Puyallup Municipal Code sections 6.08.150, 8.04.010, 8.04.020, 8.04.120, 8.04.160, and 8.18.020, and adding new sections 8.04.085, 8.04.185 and
MONTGOMERY COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS (05-3-6)
MONTGOMERY COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS (05-3-6) 1. The purpose of these Regulations are to promote the public health, safety and general welfare for the citizens of Montgomery County, Tennessee in
WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE LEGAL SERVICES
WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE LEGAL SERVICES 2011 Legislative Update Laws Passed that Affect Law Enforcement The following information represents both synopsis and full-text of laws passed during the 2011
ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS NAVAJO NATION NAVAJO NATION ANIMAL CONTROL. Fort Defiance, Arizona (928)729-4023 - (928)729-4239 Many Farms, Arizona
NAVAJO NATION ANIMAL CONTROL LAWS NAVAJO NATION ANIMAL CONTROL Fort Defiance, Arizona (928)729-4023 - (928)729-4239 Many Farms, Arizona rock, New Mexico (928)7814380 (505)368-1235 Tuba City, Arizona Crownpoint,
ORDINANCE NO. 05-02 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
ORDINANCE NO. 05-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE II OF THE LEON COUNTY CODE OF LAWS ENTITLED ANIMAL CONTROL ; AMENDING SECTION
How To Get A Dog Service Officer In Clackamas County
TITLE 5 ANIMALS Summary 5.01 ANIMAL LICENSING, SERVICES AND ENFORCEMENT... 1 TITLE 5 ANIMALS 5.01 ANIMAL LICENSING, SERVICES AND ENFORCEMENT... 1 Table of Contents 5.01 ANIMAL LICENSING, SERVICES AND ENFORCEMENT...
TITLE 8 ANIMALS CHAPTERS:
TITLE 8 ANIMALS CHAPTERS: 8.01 Animal Control and Protection (Repealed 12/22/87) 8.02 General Provisions 8.04 Animal Control Officers 8.06 Licenses 8.08 Proper Care of Animals 8.10 Animal Nuisances 8.12
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY BYLAW NUMBER 2001-115
1 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY BYLAW NUMBER 2001-115 A BY-LAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE MUZZLING & LEASHING OF VICIOUS DOGS. WHEREAS Section 210, Subsection 10, R.S.O., 1990, c. M. 45, of the
MECKLENBURG COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL SEC. 3-1. PURPOSE Page 3 SEC. 3-2. CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT Page 3 SEC. 3-3. DEFINITIONS Page 3-7 SEC. 3-4 EFFECTIVE DATE Page 7 SEC. 3-5
http://library.municode.com/print.aspx?clientid=14972&htmrequest=http%3a%2f%2fli...
Page 1 of 17 Fresno County, California, Code of Ordinances >> Title 9 - ANIMALS >> TITLE 9 - ANIMALS Chapters: 9.04Dog Licensing and Control 9.08Pets or Novelties 9.12Estray Impoundment 9.16Rodents and
WARREN COUNTY, IOWA CHAPTER 21 CHAPTER 21 ANIMAL CONTROL
TITLE III PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY CHAPTER 21 ANIMAL CONTROL 21.01 Purpose 21.07 Right to Kill 21.02 Definitions 21.08 Keeping of Vicious Dogs and Dangerous Animals Prohibited 21.03 Responsibilities of
