Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal. Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives:



Similar documents
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY

DEFINITIONS. Annual Appraisal the performance evaluation conducted once a year that goes in an employee s permanent record.

The Citadel Policies & Procedures Human Resources Department. Employee Performance Management System

B. Probationary Evaluations

Performance Management System

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL APPRAISER S GUIDE

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EMPLOYEE GUIDE

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Civil Service Performance Management System

Performance Evaluation for Classified and Unclassified Non-Academic Staff

Department of Management Services Division of Human Resource Management PROGRAM GUIDELINES

~~4 <l,.p. Human Resources Director

University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form

Yale University Performance Management Guide

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2010 Page 1 of 12

This policy provides establishes procedures for evaluating employees performance and communicating performance expectations.

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419

FY 2015 Senior Professional (SP) Performance Appraisal System Opening Guidance

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

Employee Performance Review

Chapter 110, Florida Statutes; Chapter 60L-35, Florida Administrative Code; Executive Director

RATER S GUIDE STATE OF ALASKA

Employee Performance Management Program. Revised and Reformatted, February 20, 2006; supersedes former policy HR6.30

DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS

DENTON COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION CHAPTER III EMPLOYMENT. P a g e 10 32

FANSHAWE COLLEGE POLICY MANUAL TITLE: PERFORMANCE PLANNING, REVIEW AND COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES 1-B-25

Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers

Instruction Manual. May, 2015 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

NRCS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR NEW 5 LEVEL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODEL POLICY (Revised and Effective 11/1/09) MANDATORY BASELINE EPMS SYSTEM

Delaware County Human Resources Department Performance Review System Supervisor Guide

INTRODUCTION PART ONE: REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS

PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BY: LOUISE AGYEMAN-BARNING

University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees. Supervisor Guide

Tips for Filling out the Performance Planning and Appraisal Form (PPAF):

HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:

Public Act 101 of 2011: Amendments to the Michigan Teacher Tenure Law

Performance Management S TA F F D E V E L O P M E N T & T R A I N I N G

Oregon University System

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Performance Management

STATE OF VERMONT ATTORNEY PAY PLAN

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

Compensation Plan for Exempt and Non-Exempt Staff

Employee Performance Management System (EPMS) - FAQs

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDE

POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05)

Practices and challenges of employee performance appraisal in the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Ethiopia

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014

Reclamation Manual Directives and Standards

Performance Appraisal System

Table of Contents Performance Management Process Schedule II Levels P age

Program Statement DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Number: B Date: February 3, 2011 Supersedes: A (5/30/01) Evaluations

Performance-Based Evaluation Handbook

ACC Performance Excellence Program (PEP)

Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS. Department of the Navy Handbook. Version 2.

STATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD PAY PLAN

XYZ Contractors, Inc.

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Manager / Supervisor Performance Review

State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05)

ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM No. 92 Rev. 1. SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Evaluation System

AMOCO SKILLS APPRAISAL

PART I D.C. PERSONNEL REGULATIONS CHAPTER 14 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONTENTS

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT

User s Guide to Performance Management

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP)

9. Performance Appraisal Tools and Techniques 1. Tools Ranking Method Limitations of Ranking Method: Forced Distribution method

TITLE, POSITION AND SALARY CONTROL FOR PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL PS-20

3300 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 3301 PROBATIONARY SYSTEM. A. Policy

CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Transcription:

Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal Section 8-1: General Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives: Provides a basis for the determination of the level of performance, to involve the employee in this determination and to identify areas of work which need improvement or which exceed the expectations of the position. Provides a performance based evaluation for the award of compensation increases based on performance levels. Improves communication between employees and management. Section 8-2: Job Description The basis for evaluating performance is the job description. Department Heads assure that job descriptions for positions in their departments are accurate and reflect essential functions. Employees are accountable for performing all aspects of the job description in a proficient manner. Section 8-3: Standards of Performance The standards expected of an employee are to be established and communicated by the Department Head or supervisor prior to the appraisal process. The Department Head or supervisor is expected to involve the employee: In establishing the criteria by which his/her performance is to be judged; In planning future improvements in that performance; and In establishing mutual responsibilities and expectations with respect to improving job performance. 8.1

Section 8-4: Communication With Employee The Department Head or supervisor is required to meet with new employees, within 30 days of hire, transfer, promotion, demotion, etc., and with all other employees at the beginning of each evaluation cycle for the following purposes: To review the job description to assure that it is accurate. Any necessary revisions in essential functions should be recommended to the Human Resources Department in the form of a revised job description. To identify and clearly define the responsibilities of the employee and the expectations of the supervisor. The weight for each element shall be established by the Department Head or supervisor and communicated to the employee. To establish objectives for the employee using a department work plan as a base. This is intended to be a manual setting of objectives, which may be used to establish a basis for the performance rating. Section 8-5: Interim Review At any time during the evaluation cycle, the supervisor may arrange a time to meet with the employee for the following purposes: Review progress. The supervisor shares with the employee any performance problems that have been noted and outlines measures needed for improvement. Supervisors are encouraged to schedule a review with those employees who are exceeding their performance objectives in order to support their achievements. Review employee concerns. The employee shares any problems being experienced which may be hindering job performance. For example, sometimes equipment or personnel problems exist that could be corrected by the supervisor, or 8.2

daily operations have changed to the point of making it difficult to accomplish an initially agreed upon objective. At this time, any changes in the initial expectations may be noted. This conference may be requested by either the supervisor or the employee. Whether or not a formal conference is held, it is the supervisor's responsibility to advise the employee of performance deficiencies. Section 8-6: Evaluation Conference At least two weeks prior to the employee s Performance Review Date (PRD), the immediate supervisor shall schedule a time for the evaluation conference. Before this conference, the supervisor must complete the appropriate evaluation document and any supporting narrative necessary to clarify the performance appraisal rating or describe any corrective actions necessary to achieve satisfactory performance. Prior to meeting with the employee, the completed evaluation document must receive any necessary departmental approvals and be forwarded to the Human Resources Department for review and salary computation as outlined in Chapter 3. The employee is provided with a copy of the evaluation document prior to the conference. Discussion between the employee and the supervisor should be related to performance factors and should deal only with job related matters. The employee should be encouraged to submit a response to the evaluation, particularly if there are areas of disagreement. If an employee refuses to sign the evaluation form and any additional pages, the reviewer should note this on the evaluation form, and sign and date the notation. 8.3

Section 8-7: Performance Appraisal Rating Performance appraisal ratings qualify the employee for a performance based salary increase in accordance with the rules and regulations set forth in Chapter 3. The numerical rating scale ranges from 0 to 14.00+ for each element, and specific definitions are provided on the evaluation document. An employee s total score determines the overall performance level. Actions to be taken based on scores are as follows: 0-2.99 = UNSATISFACTORY/MARGINAL (Output consistently below expectations) Termination if employee is probationary, and termination or demotion if regular employee. 3.00-4.99 = REQUIRES IMPROVEMENT (Output fails to consistently meet expectations) Supervisor and employee must develop a Corrective Action Plan with a realistic timeframe that identifies those performance factors needing improvement. Reevaluation within 60 days. Lack of improvement may result in termination or demotion. 5.00-7.50 = PROFICIENT (Meets expectations of the position in all areas.) 7.51-10.99 = HIGHLY PROFICIENT (Routinely performs on a level that is beyond what is expected for the position.) 11.00 14.00 = EXCEPTIONAL 8.4

(Work during the evaluation period has consisted of extraordinary efforts in a single project or a number of specific tasks that would not be considered a routine function of that position). Section 8-8: Corrective Action A written corrective action plan must be developed for each employee whose performance requires improvement. The plan clearly identifies for the employee the expectations of the supervisor and establishes a realistic time frame for achievement. An additional performance evaluation document (reevaluation) must be completed in 60 days. No additional compensation is awarded to an employee on a reevaluation for corrective action. Section 8-9: Exceptional Performance Exceptional performance is that which consists of extraordinary efforts in a single project or a number of specific tasks that would not be considered a routine function of the employee s position. Should the numerical scoring completed by the immediate supervisor of an employee indicate exceptional performance, the evaluation detailing the exceptional performance must be forwarded to the County Administrator for review and approval of the pay for performance salary increase. This approval process must occur prior to any discussion of the evaluation with the employee. 8.5