bla bla OPEN-XCHANGE Open-Xchange Hardware Needs



Similar documents
Open-Xchange Server High availability Daniel Halbe, Holger Achtziger

Open-Xchange Whitepaper Open-Xchange Server 6 Architecture Overview

Oracle Database Scalability in VMware ESX VMware ESX 3.5

Introduction 1 Performance on Hosted Server 1. Benchmarks 2. System Requirements 7 Load Balancing 7

This guide specifies the required and supported system elements for the application.

Wikimedia architecture. Mark Bergsma Wikimedia Foundation Inc.

How To Test For Performance And Scalability On A Server With A Multi-Core Computer (For A Large Server)

The deployment of OHMS TM. in private cloud

Centrata IT Management Suite 3.0

NetIQ Access Manager 4.1

Tuning Tableau Server for High Performance

Microsoft Exchange Solutions on VMware

MID-TIER DEPLOYMENT KB

Full and Para Virtualization

Technical Specifications

scalability OneBridge

Managing your Red Hat Enterprise Linux guests with RHN Satellite

Tableau Server 7.0 scalability

JBoss Seam Performance and Scalability on Dell PowerEdge 1855 Blade Servers

Tableau Server Scalability Explained

Eloquence Training What s new in Eloquence B.08.00

Case Study - I. Industry: Social Networking Website Technology : J2EE AJAX, Spring, MySQL, Weblogic, Windows Server 2008.

MakeMyTrip CUSTOMER SUCCESS STORY

Scaling Database Performance in Azure

Performance and scalability of a large OLTP workload

Parallel Replication for MySQL in 5 Minutes or Less

How To Choose Between A Relational Database Service From Aws.Com

Table of Contents Introduction and System Requirements 9 Installing VMware Server 35

Tushar Joshi Turtle Networks Ltd

Enterprise Deployment: Laserfiche 8 in a Virtual Environment. White Paper

Configuration Management of Massively Scalable Systems

EWeb: Highly Scalable Client Transparent Fault Tolerant System for Cloud based Web Applications

Serving 4 million page requests an hour with Magento Enterprise

Cloud Based Application Architectures using Smart Computing

A Modular Architecture Using Open Source Components

Architecting ColdFusion For Scalability And High Availability. Ryan Stewart Platform Evangelist

Performance Evaluation of VMXNET3 Virtual Network Device VMware vsphere 4 build

System requirements for A+

Parallels Plesk Automation

Implementation & Capacity Planning Specification

Web Hosting. Hosting. Cloud File Hosting. The Genio Group (214)

Tier Architectures. Kathleen Durant CS 3200

System Requirements Table of contents

GeoCloud Project Report USGS/EROS Spatial Data Warehouse Project

Very Large Enterprise Network, Deployment, Users

Uptime Infrastructure Monitor. Installation Guide

Quantum StorNext. Product Brief: Distributed LAN Client

One Server Per City: C Using TCP for Very Large SIP Servers. Kumiko Ono Henning Schulzrinne {kumiko, hgs}@cs.columbia.edu

Zadara Storage Cloud A

Web Application Hosting Cloud Architecture

Chapter 1 - Web Server Management and Cluster Topology

Pervasive PSQL Vx Server Licensing

White Paper. Recording Server Virtualization

msuite5 & mdesign Installation Prerequisites

High-Availability and Scalability

An Oracle White Paper July Oracle Primavera Contract Management, Business Intelligence Publisher Edition-Sizing Guide

HP SN1000E 16 Gb Fibre Channel HBA Evaluation

DEDICATED MANAGED SERVER PROGRAM

Release Notes for Patch Release #2614

Testing & Assuring Mobile End User Experience Before Production. Neotys

How To Balance A Load Balancer On A Server On A Linux (Or Ipa) (Or Ahem) (For Ahem/Netnet) (On A Linux) (Permanent) (Netnet/Netlan) (Un

Petabyte Scale Data at Facebook. Dhruba Borthakur, Engineer at Facebook, SIGMOD, New York, June 2013

SOLUTION BRIEF: SLCM R12.7 PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS JANUARY, Load Test Results for Submit and Approval Phases of Request Life Cycle

VirtualCenter Database Performance for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 VirtualCenter 2.5

Sy Computing Services, Inc. TOP REASONS TO MOVE TO MICROSOFT EXCHANGE Prepared By:

Glassfish Architecture.

CS 188/219. Scalable Internet Services Andrew Mutz October 8, 2015

MS EXCHANGE SERVER ACCELERATION IN VMWARE ENVIRONMENTS WITH SANRAD VXL

Adonis Technical Requirements

High Availability Solutions for the MariaDB and MySQL Database

Microsoft SQL Server 2012 on Cisco UCS with iscsi-based Storage Access in VMware ESX Virtualization Environment: Performance Study

An overview of Drupal infrastructure and plans for future growth. prepared by Kieran Lal and Gerhard Killesreiter for the Drupal Association

McAfee Product Entitlement Definitions

5054A: Designing a High Availability Messaging Solution Using Microsoft Exchange Server 2007

AlphaTrust PRONTO - Hardware Requirements

Variations in Performance and Scalability when Migrating n-tier Applications to Different Clouds

Apache Tomcat Clustering

Petabyte Scale Data at Facebook. Dhruba Borthakur, Engineer at Facebook, XLDB Conference at Stanford University, Sept 2012

An Oracle White Paper August Oracle VM 3: Server Pool Deployment Planning Considerations for Scalability and Availability

Petabyte Scale Data at Facebook. Dhruba Borthakur, Engineer at Facebook, UC Berkeley, Nov 2012

A Scalability Study for WebSphere Application Server and DB2 Universal Database

Scaling Analysis Services in the Cloud

An Oracle White Paper Released Sept 2008

Mark Bennett. Search and the Virtual Machine

Very Large Enterprise Network Deployment, 25,000+ Users

Performance And Scalability In Oracle9i And SQL Server 2000

Using VMware VMotion with Oracle Database and EMC CLARiiON Storage Systems

Office 365 Migration Performance & Server Requirements

DIABLO TECHNOLOGIES MEMORY CHANNEL STORAGE AND VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN : VDI ACCELERATION

Performance and Scalability Overview

Preparation Guide. How to prepare your environment for an OnApp Cloud v3.0 (beta) deployment.

InterScan Web Security Virtual Appliance

Scalability of web applications. CSCI 470: Web Science Keith Vertanen

VMware vrealize Automation

Virtuoso and Database Scalability

Performance Comparison of Fujitsu PRIMERGY and PRIMEPOWER Servers

Business white paper. HP Process Automation. Version 7.0. Server performance

Transcription:

bla bla OPEN-XCHANGE Open-Xchange Hardware Needs

OPEN-XCHANGE: Open-Xchange Hardware Needs Publication date Wednesday, 8 January version.

. Hardware Needs with Open-Xchange.. Overview The purpose of this document is to get an idea about the hardware needed when rolling out Open-Xchange, depending on the amount of concurrent users. The picture below shows how an Open-Xchange cluster could look like. The Open-Xchange architecture is designed to scale vertically as well as horizontally. This means all services can run on one physical server as well as on different machines. If more CPU or is added to a single server, it is efficiently used. If more resources are required, either the cluster can be extended, services can be outsourced to separate machines or hardware can be extended later on. The architecture currently has no known physical limits. The application also runs in virtual environments e.g., XEN and VMware. Figure. OX Cluster.. How to calculate concurrent sessions If several users are connected to the Open-Xchange application at the same time we are speaking of concurrent sessions. Based on Open-Xchange s experience, the number of concurrent sessions can be calculated from existing mailboxes. For this calculation we need to distinguish between Webmail accounts which are given to the end users for free, and fully featured Groupware accounts which are paid by the end user. The main reason, why this accounts into the relation, is because free webmail accounts have a much shorter session

lifetime as they are mostly used to check emails for example once a day. The paid groupware accounts normally have a much longer session lifetime, as the accounts are used during the whole working day. The relation between groupware accounts (existing in the system) and concurrent users at peak time is between :5 and :. For cost free Webmail mailboxes the relation varies from :5 to : in this case it is safe to calculate the amount from already existing services which should get replaced by Open-Xchange..3. Planning the Open-Xchange application servers On the Open-Xchange application servers, the main factors are and CPU. If the Filestore resides on a separate server, IO is almost negligible. The main factor is. For each concurrent user, 4MB of needs to be available in the Cluster to allow efficient caching. It is also recommended to have 64Bit CPUs and to assign one CPU core to each GB of..4. Planning the Apache Instances In small environments the Apache instances can run on the same physical hosts as the application servers. Starting with 4 to 5 application servers it is recommended to have own Apache servers on separate machines. The number of Apache instances should not be higher than the number of application servers available. The Apache Server acts as a proxy between clients and groupware servers and transfers the application data to the users' web browsers..5. Planning the MySQL Database In Open-Xchange clusters, the database write-connections in proportion to the read-connections is about :3. Open-Xchange has a pool for database connections where active users share one connection in average. The memory for database servers should be at least double of the data which is used for MySQL files. This makes sure that read connections can be served out of and there is room for a growing database. It is recommended to have at least one MySQL server that serves two application nodes. For high-availble setups, the minimum for production use is one MySQL master and one MySQL slave server (MySQL replication is supported by Open-Xchange). If more slaves are needed, a load balancer is required to distribute the read requests. Open-Xchange recommends to not exceed following limits: 5 database schemas per database instance contexts per database schema 5 users per context.6. Planning the filestore server space The filestore depends on the customer usage. If Open-Xchange acts only as webmail replacement without the store, no space is needed at all but required later if upsell to full groupware functionality is planned. In case the filestore is in use, the space must be at least as big as the physical space of all customer documents plus versions of them. Since the application has the ability to overbook the physical space, it is required to monitor free space during operation and to extend the space as required.

.7. Network Traffic Throughput Profile The following tables show the network traffic demands of webmail end users. The figures are calculated from huge installations serving multiple thousands of concurrent sessions. The figures can be used for a base calculation. in out sum MB/day 3. 3.7 6.9 Table. Internet <-> user traffic per user in out sum MB/day.. 3. Table. Database <-> Open-Xchange traffic per user.8. Load balancer There is no special requirement for the load balancer. The load balancer can be a hardware or software solution. Session stickiness is provided by the proxy ajp functionality of the Apache server. www.keepalived.org is known to work reliable.. Different scenarios and recommendations In the following sections you will find some recommendations for standard setups. These are to be regarded as general recommendations to have a basic guideline. Many other deployments are possible depending on the real infrastructure and existing services... Minimum Setup On-Premises All services can be installed on one machine. With this setup high availability is not given. As all services are running on this machine, it scales to approximately, to, concurrently logged in users. This scenario is only recommended for companies which do not need high availability. OX Application server Mysql servers Apache servers File store Servers Load Balancer 8GB Table 3. 3

.. Minimum High Availability Setup On-Premises / Hosting Environments From a scalability perspective, this deployment is equivalent to the one described above. The main difference is, that all services are running on two machines. OX Application servers are running loadbalanced and the database is separated to one master and one slave. Failover can be implemented with all known Linux mechanisms. For this setup it may be recommended to have the filestore mounted from an external system. OX Application server Mysql servers Apache servers File store Servers Load Balancer pt. 8GB 4 Table 4..3. Hosting Environment up to 5, / 5, users The following setup is the minimum recommendation to allow a high quality service without significant interruption in case of hardware failures. This setup gives flexible scalability for future requirements, so it is a safe starting point even for larger deployments, additional machines can be added during operation with growing user numbers. Given the ratios from above, the system scales up to approximately 5, paid groupware accounts or equivalent to 5, free webmail accounts. OX Application server Mysql servers Apache servers File store Servers Load Balancer 8GB 4GB 4 Table 5..4. Example deployment for millions of users This is one example (!) for a real huge deployment using all available distribution mechanisms. Of course environments like this need to be defined together based on the real infrastructure. In this example all services are running on multiple separate machines to gain maximum flexible transparent scalability. The given example would allow to serve approximately half a million paid groupware accounts or equivalent 5Mio of free webmail users. OX Application server 6GB 8 4

Mysql servers Apache servers File store Servers Load Balancer 6 6 4GB GB Table 6. 3. Test Results Fujitsu, SUSE, and OX cooperated to provide sizing information for Open-Xchange Server Hosting Edition on a given setup of hardware and software. The goal is to provide guidance for product managers at service providers. On the setup used (Fujitsu CX, SLES) the amount of users that can be served per blade (Fujitsu CX) varies between 3.5 and 3. concurrent users. Resource requirements are highly dependent on specific usage scenarios. What this paper provides are upper and lower bounds of what can be expected from a given hardware / software scenarios in extreme cases. 35 users would represent a call center where every user schedules a new appointment, sends an email, or adds a new contact every second. 3. users represent a realistic scenario on the hardware described below for users who pause between actions like adding calendar entries and deleting contacts from a list. 3.. Results 5MBit/s traffic, 5% CPU load, % used (ca. 5GB on OX servers / 3.75MB per user), 4 connections to webserver, 6 queries per second through 4 connections to the database 3.. Scenario virtual OX domains with 5 users each 4 emulated concurrent browser users pre-filled accounts, Inbox with emails, new / reply / delete mail, new / accept / delete appointments, new / edit / delete contacts 3.3. Hardware Used For Tests 5x Fujitsu CX blades (Dual Xeon 56, 48GB ), deployed in CXS Rack, containing Brocade 648S switches 5

3.4. Software Used For Tests x Webserver+OX (SLES, Apache, OX 6.-rev9) x OX (SLES, OX 6.-rev9) x DB Master (SLES, MySQL 5.5, InnoDB with multi core setting) x DB Slave (SLES, MySQL 5.5, InnoDB with multi core setting) x IMAP Server (SLES, Cyrus, Postfix) Ramdisk for IMAP and DBMS 6