~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE



Similar documents
ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv VEC Document 71-1 Filed 09/05/14 Page 76 of 87. x : : : : : : : x [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

How To Approve A Settlement In A Lawsuit Against A Man Who Is A Former Patient Of A Farm Animal

!El._ECTRO~ lcally FnXD

~[PR~] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR CLASS NOTICE

Case 2:10-cv IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

CASE 0:99-md PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Courtroom: 19 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 131 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 14 ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

Case3:12-cv CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:02-cv TS Document 602 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

How To Write A Court Filing In A Commerz Settlement Case

JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. CV DSF (AJWx)

Case 4:08-cv RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

reg Doc Filed 04/23/12 Entered 04/23/12 15:12:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 70 Filed: 07/09/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1213

The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc.

Case 1:09-cv JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A

Case 1:11-cv LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO C

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 22-1 Filed: 04/22/15 Page 1 of 61 PageID #:92

[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 130 Filed: 03/11/13 Page 1 of 82 PageID #:2062

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 8:13-cv GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE. WHEREAS, Prince was employed as KSU s head football coach between December 5, 2005 and December 31, 2008; and

Case 3:11-cv RBL Document 40 Filed 06/14/13 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-UNGARO-BENAGES/BROWN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 64-1 Filed: 07/14/14 Page 2 of 40 PageID #:498 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:14-cv JFC Document 43 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

rdd Doc 402 Filed 10/25/13 Entered 10/25/13 16:17:31 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. (Jointly Administered)

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. [PROPOSEBf ORDER APPROVING DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This settlement agreement and the annexed exhibits (the Settlement Agreement ) is

Case5:12-cv EJD Document136 Filed01/29/15 Page1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case 2:06-cv FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11

v. No. D-202-CV

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR Tel:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Class Action Settlement Agreement ( Agreement or Settlement Agreement ) is

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT. This notice explains the lawsuit, the settlement, your rights and the potential distribution of settlement funds.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE RECITALS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of the 5th day of February, Between

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 66 Filed: 06/12/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:662

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of the 21 ST day of August, Between

l Civil Action No. 11 Civ (PGG)

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREF.MENT. CFDIC-R"), on the une hand, and Group One Mmtgage, Inc., ("the Settling Defendant")

*MFGLOBAL* For Official Use Only

1. CLAIMANTTHE Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver for McINTOSH COMMERCIAL BANK its heirs, successors and assigns ("FDIC-R").

Case 1:08-cv DLC Document 108 Filed 09/10/10 Page 1 of 5

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY

Employee Settlement and Release Agreement.

In re Weatherford International Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box Dublin, OH PROOF OF CLAIM FORM

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 56 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE YOU MUST COMPLETE THIS CLAIM FORM AND SUBMIT IT BY NOVEMBER 23, 2013 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO SHARE IN THE SETTLEMENT.

Case 1:11-md RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) )

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement (hereafter Agreement ) is entered into by

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. between Shahar Lushe and William Youngblood ( Plaintiffs ), for themselves and the settlement

Sample Settlement Agreement and Release for an Employment Law Claim

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Whereas this civil forfeiture action (the "California Action") was filed on

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEANNETTE CLARK, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiff,

UTi Settlement Agreement

Case5:12-cv EJD Document55-4 Filed05/01/14 Page1 of 19 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY PROTOCOL FOR 360NETWORKS INC. AND ITS AFFILIATED COMPANIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368

OSCAR ROBERTSON, et al., 70 Civ (RLC) Plaintiffs,

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN MARK LONG AND THE STATE OF OREGON RECITALS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT

rdd Doc 1181 Filed 08/10/15 Entered 08/10/15 11:09:58 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Transcription:

Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 110 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDWARD ZYBURO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, NCSPLUS INC., v. Plaintiff, Defendant. CASE NO: 12-cv-06677 (JSR,.,.. D\ J '.... ~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE M a,foh I~ This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to the order of this Court, dated, 2015, on the motion of the Settling Parties for approval of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated March 6, 2015 ("Stipulation" or "Stipulation of Settlement", and on Class Counsel's motion for an award of attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. Due and adequate notice having been given to the Class as required previously by this Court, and the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. The Court, for purposes of this Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice ("Judgment", incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation of Settlement, and all terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation, unless otherwise set forth herein.

Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 110 Filed 06/29/15 Page 2 of 6 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and over all parties to the Action, including all Settlement Class Members. 3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, this Court hereby approves the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation and finds that said Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate to the Settlement Class, and the Settling Parties are hereby directed to perform its terms. All objections to the Settlement, if any, are overruled in their entirety. 4. The Action and all claims contained therein, as well as all of the Released Claims, are dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff and the Settlement Class Members, as against each and all of the Released Persons. The Settling Parties are to bear their own costs, except as otherwise provided in the Stipulation. 5. Upon the Effective Date, Plaintiff shall, and each of the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged against the Released Persons all Released Claims (including Unknown Claims as well as all claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with, the defense, settlement or resolution of the Action; provided, however, that if Defendant (a fails to execute the Stipulation and such other documents as may be required to obtain final Court approval of the Stipulation, (b fails to cause Continental' s contribution to the Settlement Fund to be deposited with the Escrow Agent; or exercises its option to terminate the Stipulation pursuant to the Stipulation, such releases shall not apply to Defendant and Defendant shall not be a Released Person. 6. Upon the Effective Date, Plaintiff and each of the Settlement Class Members, and their predecessors, successors, agents, representatives, attorneys and affiliates, and the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of them, shall be permanently barred 2

Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 110 Filed 06/29/15 Page 3 of 6 and enjoined from the assertion, institution, maintenance, prosecution or enforcement against Defendant, or any other Released Persons, in any state or federal court or arbitral forum, or in the court of any foreign jurisdiction, of any and all Released Claims; provided, however, that if Defendant (a fails to execute the Stipulation and such other documents as may be required to obtain final Court approval of the Stipulation, (b fails to cause Continental' s contribution to the Settlement Fund to be deposited with the Escrow Agent; or exercises its option to terminate the Stipulation pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiff and each of the Settlement Class Members, and their predecessors, successors, agents, representatives, attorneys and affiliates, and the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of them, shall not be so barred or enjoined with respect to claims against Defendant. 7. Upon the Effective Date, Defendant and any other Released Person shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged Plaintiff, Settlement Class Members and Plaintiffs Counsel, in accordance with 15 U.S.C. s. 78u-4(f(7(A, from all claims (including Unknown Claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with, the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement or resolution of the Action. 8. The Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action provided to the Settlement Class, including the postcard notice to all Settlement Class Members who were identified through reasonable effort, was the best notice practicable under the circumstances. Said notice provided the best notice practicable under the circumstances of those proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, including the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation, to all Persons entitled to such notice, and said notice fully satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the requirements of due process. 3

Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 110 Filed 06/29/15 Page 4 of 6 9. The Plan of Distribution is approved as fair, adequate and reasonable. 10. The Settlement Administrator is directed to administer the Settlement Fund in accordance with the terms of this order, the Stipulation, and the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action. 11. Neither the Stipulation nor the Settlement contained therein, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the Settlement: (a is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any wrongdoing or liability of Defendant; or (b is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission, or evidence, of any fault or omission of any Defendant in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal; or (c is or may be deemed to be, or may be used as an admission, or evidence, that any claims asserted by Plaintiff were not valid or that the amount recoverable was not greater than the Settlement amount in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal. The Released Persons may file the Stipulation and/or the Judgment in any action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. 12. The Settlement Agreement contemplates Plaintiffs Counsel requesting a fee, costs and expenses award of no more than 25% of the Settlement Fund. Plaintiffs Counsel have filed a separate Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs and expenses which requests the Court approve this percentage. No Class Member has objected to Plaintiff Counsel's request for a payment of attorneys' fees, costs and expenses, and no Class Member has objected to the amount 4

Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 110 Filed 06/29/15 Page 5 of 6 of the request. After considering the submission of Plaintiff in support of their motion, the Court finds that the requested fee award of 25% of the common fund is reasonable and should be approved. Moreoever, the Court approves as reasonable Plaintiffs Counsel's costs and expenses of JI J 'I lo, 1 \ lr.1 ~. 13. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Plaintiff request that this Court grant him a service award of $10,000.00 to compensate him for his time, commitment and expense spent on this litigation. Under the facts of this case, a payment of $10,000.00 to the Plaintiff who served as the class representative does not give rise to a conflict between the representative and the Class, but instead is an appropriate measure of compensation both for the Plaintiffs time and in recognition of the public good the Plaintiff has accomplished through the present settlement. Mr. Zyburo has played an active role throughout this litigation. He has participated in discovery, including submitting to a deposition in New York, appeared and testified at the hearing on the motion for class certification and participated in mediation. Given this investment of time by Mr. Zyburo, the Court finds a service award of $10,000 to Mr. Zyburo is warranted and appropriate. 14. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over: (a implementation of this Settlement and any award or distribution of the Settlement Fund; (b disposition of the Settlement Fund; and ( c all Parties hereto for the purpose of construing, enforcing, and administering the Stipulation of Settlement. 15. The Court finds that during the course of the Action, the Settling Parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. 5

Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 110 Filed 06/29/15 Page 6 of 6 16. In the event that the Settlement does not become effective in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation, or the Stipulation terminates according to its provisions, or in the event that the Settlement Fund, or any portion thereof, is returned to Continental, or this Judgment does not become Final within the time frames set out in the Stipulation or this order, as applicable, then this Judgment shall be rendered null and void and shall be vacated and, in such event, all orders entered and releases given in connection herewith shall be null and void, nunc pro tune, except that (I any modifications, reversal, or vacation of the award of attorney's fees, costs and expenses to Plaintiffs Counsel on appeal or in any further motions in this Court shall in no way disturb or affect any other part of this Judgment, and (2 any further proceedings, whether in this Court or on appeal, related to the Plan of Distribution, shall in no way disturb or affect any other part of this Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 6