GUIDE TO NEW COSTS IN CIVIL CASE RULES GOVERNMENT REFORMS



Similar documents
Proposals for Reform of Civil Litigation Funding and Costs in England and Wales

Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA)

LASPO. Why has. come about brief history of reforms

The four year assessment evaluating the outcome of The Jackson Review and LASPO on ATE, BTE and more. Tony Buss, Managing Director ARAG (UK)

Key aspects of the Jackson review and related reforms - progress update as at 3 rd September 2012

The Incorporated Law Society of Cardiff and District. Members Forum 30 January 2013 JACKSON REFORMS WHERE ARE WE NOW? Michael Imperato Simon Cradick

The Jackson Reforms Jan Thompson, Director

professional negligence:

Conditional Fee Arrangements, After the Event Insurance and beyond!

THE JACKSON REFORMS. Lord Justice Jackson s review of Civil litigation costs and the impact on insurers. Nicola Billen. The Jackson Reforms

CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS GUIDANCE

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS ORDER No. 689

Short Form CFA based on "APIL/PIBA 9" for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims from

APIL/PIBA CFA version 9, for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims, from ,

Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know

Major UK Government Proposals on Reform of Litigation Costs and Funding

A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers March 2014

Pre-action Conduct of Litigation

T&Lbulletin CONSTRUCTION TECHNICAL & LEGAL BULLETIN FEBRUARY 2013

UK: Government Implementation of Jackson Reforms on the Costs and Funding of Litigation. Introduction of Contingency Fees and increased Mediation

Conditional Fee Agreement ( CFA ) [For use in personal injury and clinical negligence cases only].

Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know

Nick Pargeter Partner, BLM

Personal Injury Litigation after APRIL Cambridge Medico-legal society

Guide to litigation costs and funding

Briefing for the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill Committee. An interlocking package of reforms

DBA Regulations. My understanding of the decisions that have been made and questions that may arise are:

Damages Based Agreements: The Basics

Welcome: The Zurich Jackson & MOJ Reforms Webinar will begin shortly Mojhelpline@uk.zurich.com

HER MAJESTY S COURTS SERVICE (HMCS) Part of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) CIVIL COURT FEES A RESPONSE BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS

The New CFA and DBA Regime. Simon Edwards

Who are the winners?

Guide to compensation claims against the police

making a road traffic accident claim

How To Get After The Event Insurance For Clinical Negligence Litigation

Challenges to Solicitors charges in the post Jackson era

Advice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction

Disease: solving disputes post 1 April 2013

QBE European Operations. Portal extension. Guidance document June Ministry of Justice extension to the claims protocols Maximising Opportunities

GUIDE TO FUNDING YOUR MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIM

Clinical negligence. Grounds

making a personal injury compensation claim

briefing Guide to litigation funding

Insider. Damages-Based Agreements: potential or potential pitfall? Don McCue March 2013

PERSONAL INJURIES BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL

GADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS

Reforming Civil Litigation Funding and Costs in England and Wales Implementation of Lord Justice Jackson s Recommendations. The Government Response

Implementing Jackson: reform of 'no win, no fee' claims & related changes - 6 th November 2012

CFAs & ATE Policies Implications for Professional Indemnity Market

Client Bulletin. June 2013 Ministry of Justice Reforms update and practical guidance

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS (AMENDMENT) ORDER No. [Draft]

questions fees payable under the new process?

Key Developments in Health and Safety law

1.3 Analyse the roles of the key participants in a PI case

FUNDING LITIGATION THE NEW MENU. by JEREMY MORGAN QC

Lord Justice Jackson s Review of Civil Litigation Costs

DAMAGES BASED AGREEMENTS AND CONTINGENCY FEES. Colm Barry

No win no fee: our proposition after Jackson

There are alternatives to Sir Rupert Jackson s recommendations that have the benefit that they might actually work.

Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation Bill Consultation Response by GCC

This agreement is a binding legal contract between you and your solicitor/s. Before you sign, please read everything carefully.

Clinical Negligence: A guide to making a claim

Conditional Fee Agreements: best practice. no win - no fee - limiting the cost of claims to taxpayers

CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE IMPACT OF THE JACKSON REFORMS ON COSTS AND CASE MANAGEMENT

Costs Law Update Lamont v Burton

Whether the government is correct in describing the UK as the whiplash capital of the world

Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper

QBE European Operations. UK Casualty Claims. Policyholder guide March Jackson reforms and Ministry of Justice Claims Portal Extension

CONSULTATION QUESTIONS

LEGAL AID ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW INTO ESTABLISHING A CONTINGENCY LEGAL AID FUND IN NORTHERN IRELAND

CASE TRACK LIMITS AND THE CLAIMS PROCESS FOR PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CLAIMANT EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL AND EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORK TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT

Your Guide to Pursuing a Personal Injury Claim

Civil Litigation Reforms. March 2013

1.3 Analyse the roles of the key participants in a PI case

Personal Injury Claims

Introductory Considerations for Personal Injury Lawyers. Level 4. Credit value 8. Assessment criteria. Learning outcomes

FIXED RECOVERABLE COSTS IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE PRE CONSULTATION RESPONSE BY. Action against Medical Accidents

Transcription:

GUIDE TO NEW COSTS IN CIVIL CASE RULES GOVERNMENT REFORMS MAKE SURE YOU GET INSURANCE Introduction Landlords faced with claims from tenants have also in the past had to often pay success fees where tenants have been assisted through conditional fee agreements (CFAs). The Government has announced a package of reforms which will take effect from 1 st April 2013. These rules make it even more imperative that landlords of residential accommodation take out public liability policies. In particular, it is vital to ensure that there is cover against claims for personal injuries (e.g. tenant claims they are suffering from asthma as a result of disrepair). However, not all of these claims can be insured against. For example, there is no cover available for damages because you fail to carry out the repairs themselves. Background CFA s are a type of no-win-no-fee agreement under which lawyers do not receive a fee from their client if they lose a case, but can charge an uplift (a success fee) on top of their base legal costs if they win. When the lawyer wins these costs, including the success fee, are recoverable; i.e. they are normally paid by the losing party. 1

Under present arrangements success fees of up to 100 per cent of the lawyer s base costs are recoverable as well as after the event (ATE) insurance premiums. ATE insurance is taken out by parties in CFA cases to insure against the risk of having to pay their opponent s costs and their own out-of-pocket expenses should they lose. This can mean that defendants can be liable for up to twice the costs they would normally have had to pay if the case was not conducted under a CFA. CFA s are currently available in all civil proceedings. The intention of the Government reforms is to restore a sense of proportion and fairness but not to deny access to justice. Landlords who are involved in litigation Private landlords can become involved in litigation if sued by their tenants; e.g. for disrepair. These claims can come in two parts; (i) for personal injury, e.g. if a tenant s health has been affected by disrepair; and, (ii) for damages for disrepair itself. Landlords can insure against claims for the first - i.e. for personal injuries - but not for damages for breach of contract for failure to keep the property in repair. Landlords can also become involved in litigation in other ways as claimants. The Government reforms mean that it is even more important that landlords take out insurance cover because essentially the cost of these changes is intended to fall on insurers. However, if landlords do not have the necessary insurance cover where it can be obtained, the cost could fall on them if they are successfully sued. Reform of Conditional Fee (CFA) Agreements The right to recover success fees ordered to be paid by unsuccessful defendants, such as the landlord, and the recovery of after the event (ATE) insurance premiums from the losing side is being abolished. Litigants will still 2

be able to use CFAs but they will have to pay their own lawyer s success fee and any ATE insurance premium if they have taken one out themselves. Up to now, when insurance was taken out to cover the risk of having to pay losing costs, the premium could be obtained from the other side in the event of a win. This will no longer be allowed. 25 per cent cap on success fees in personal injury cases There are changes when it comes to looking at how much the lawyer can charge his own client if the case is won. The success fee in personal injury cases will in future be subject to a cap of 25 per cent of the damages awarded. The success fee itself must not exceed a maximum of 100 per cent of the base costs. This means that lawyers can take no more than 25 per cent of the damages as a success fee in personal injury cases (including solicitor s success fee, any barrister s success fee and VAT). The cap will not apply to appeal proceedings. The amount of the success fee will be negotiated between the lawyer and client (up to a maximum of 100 per cent of the base costs). Damage based agreements (DBA) As well as CFAs, litigants will now be allowed to use damage based agreements (DBAs) in all areas of civil litigation. This will potentially be a new form of no-win-no fee litigation. There will be caps on the amounts of damages which can be taken in costs. These will be 25 per cent for personal injury cases, 35 per cent in employment cases and 50 per cent in all other cases (e.g. damages for disrepair as opposed to personal injuries). 10 per cent increase in general damages As an offset to the loss of the right to recover the success fee, or the ATE premium from the losing party, general damages are being increased by 10 3

per cent. This includes damages awarded in contract claims; e.g. for breach of the terms of the tenancy due to disrepair. Cost protection in personal injury claims qualified one way cost shifting This is the reform which makes it so important that you obtain insurance against claims for personal injury. This will be relevant if the landlord is sued for damages for personal injury; e.g. due to disrepair to a property. A system of qualified one-way cost shifting (QOCS) in personal injury cases will be introduced so that claimants (who conduct their case properly) will not have to pay towards defendant s costs, even if their claim fails so that the landlord is liable. QOCS will be available for all: Claimants whatever their financial means; Claims that are discontinued during the proceedings (so long as they are not fraudulent); and, Appeal proceedings. Claimants who lose will not have to contribute towards defendant s costs as long as they behave appropriately. There will be no minimum payment even for a losing claimant to make. QOCS protection for the claimant will be lost if the: Claimant is found to be fraudulent; The claimant has failed to beat any defendant s offer to settle (what is called a Part 36 Offer); or, The case has been struck out where the claimant discloses no reasonable claim or is an abuse of court process. 4

The Part 36 Offer procedure will override QOCS protection but only up to the full amount of the damages recovered by the claimant. Increased sanctions under the Part 36 Procedure The penalties for not accepting an offer that is made using the Part 36 Procedure are being reformed in order to encourage early settlement. Proportionality There will be a new rule on proportionality, to control the amount of costs so that even if they are payable if too much by way of legal costs is run up relevant to the value, complexity and importance of the claim some or all of the costs can be disallowed. Referral fees There will be a prohibition on payment/receipt of referral fees in personal injury claims, including for solicitors claims management companies and insurers. Lessons for landlords If you are a landlord you may think it will not happen to you but, unfortunately, it does. There is little to stop a tenant making a claim against you if he or she can get a solicitor to back it. The new rules will make it even more important they you have insurance cover for this eventuality. Briefing paper correct as of 31 st October 2012. 2012, Residential Landlords Association. All rights reserved. 5