TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE CALCULATOR

Similar documents
USDN Triple Bottom Line Manual July 18, 2012

SUSTAINABLE RETURN ON INVESTMENT SROI

Robert D. Trimborn Airport Director Santa Monica Airport

City of Grand Rapids Approach to Renewable Energy (100% Goal By 2020) Haris Alibasic City of Grand Rapids Office of Energy and Sustainability

What is A Triple Bottom Line Economic Analysis of Improving Urban River Quality?

Sustainable Return on Investment: Measuring the Triple Bottom Line

Calgary Transit Environmental Stewardship

consulting engineers and scientists

Green Growth Platform questionnaire Answers submitted by Rahm Emanuel. Chicago s Climate Change Solutions and Clean Energy Future

GREEN JOBS STUDY U.S. GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL. U.S. Green Building Council 2101 L Street, NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20037

ICMA Insights TM Key Performance Indicators

3.0 COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS

Rules of Thumb Energy Efficiency in Buildings

Policy GRN The City will adopt a Go Green Initiative to implement strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the City s borders.

MISSION. NAVFAC Environmental Restoration

How to Sell Energy Efficiency

Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014

How To Calculate Cost Of An Eco-Friendly Building

How to Earn the LEED Green Power Credit

University of South Florida Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory FY

Haynes Recreation Center, Laredo, TX. Data Matrix and Sustainability Benchmarks

OP 9: Clean and Renewable Energy

SEATTLE STEAM COMPANY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Statements of member companies within The Green Grid

Quantifying LID Triple Bottom Line Benefits Milwaukee Case Study Kimberly Brewer, A.I.C.P. Tetra Tech

Proposal prepared for Happy Solar Owner

City of Santa Ana Sustainability Accomplishments. January 2012

How To Design A Sustainable Roofing

A Green Idea. Reclaiming Urban Wood Waste And Urban Forest Debris. For Fuel/Combustion & Renewable Energy

THE IMPLICATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE GROWTH PATTERNS ON INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS

Wind Turbine Manufacturers. Renewables Advocates. Retail Customers. Wind Project Generators. Gas, Nuclear and other Generators. Electric Utilities

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ENERGY SOURCES. Prepared by Sandra Vasa-Sideris, PhD, Southern Polytechnic State University, for use by students

Sustainability and Street Lights in Asheville, NC

The Future of Airport Design.. Sara Beardsley, AIA, LEED AP Senior Architect

Transforming America s Energy Future. Kentucky. Energy Statistics. Developed by

Triple Bottom Line Analysis for Green Infrastructure A Case Study 2012 ARCADIS

Green Infrastructure for Great Cities

Implementing Instructions - Sustainable Locations for Federal Facilities

RESOURCE EFFICIENCY SCOREBOARD DATA CENTRE ON NATURAL RESOURCES

Summit County Energy Plan - Goals A. Explanation and Comparison: State and Summit County Goals B. Measurement and Verification

Roofing Retrofits: Focus on Sustainability

Arecibo Resource Recovery Project

Za abeel Energy City Master Plan. Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Adobe Corporate Responsibility 5 Year Data Summary

Smart Cities Smart Streetlights Panel Discussion. September 23, 2014

Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Analysis Favors Green Infrastructure Over Offline Storages to Mitigate the Upper Olentangy CSOs

Envision Framework and Rating System. Melissa Peneycad November 2015

Sustainable Construction An Education and Research Perspective

GEMI Survey. EHS Metrics and Processes. April Mark Hause GEMI Benchmark Chair

TRANSPORTATION AND SUSTAINABILITY-THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE

Reasons why BEF Renewable Energy Certificates are the Right Choice

Massachusetts $ Savings and Job Gains from Energy Efficiency in Buildings & Transportation

IT for Green: Impacting the Triple Bottom Line - People, Planet, and Profits. Webcast May 21, 2008

Tysons Sustainability Summit Evidence Based Urban Design. Roger E. Frechette III, PE, LEED-AP

Pima County. Sustainable Action Plan for County Operations

ENVIRONMENTAL, ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL. Geof Syphers, PE, LEED AP BD+C Codding Enterprises 2010

CITY OF FERNDALE EAGLE Checklist

This presentation is posted for public use. ACEEE does not endorse any product or service.

The Raleigh Convention Center Raleigh, North Carolina Green Building Education A Self Guided Walking Tour

INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN NOTIFICATION FORM / PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

PENNSYLVANIA GREEN ENERGY LOAN FUND

UNDERSTANDING ENERGY BILLS & TARRIFS

REPUBLIC OF TURKEY INTENDED NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTION

University of Central Florida Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report

Attachment 1. Principles, Priorities, and Actions for Economic Renewal and Development for the City of Seattle

TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE ASSESSMENT OF UR-3R PROCESS

Metropolitan Boston Health Care Energy Profile for

TOWN OF CARRBORO NORTH CAROLINA

Transcription:

TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE CALCULATOR PRESENTED BY: ALVARO LIMA BRA Director of Research City of Boston January 2012 IEDC 2012 Leadership Summit

Overview of Presentation Background and rationale of the project The development of the current Triple Bottom Line Calculator How the Triple Bottom Line Calculator works

TBL Calculator Project Background This project was funded by the Urban Sustainability Directors Network (USDN); USDN is a network of North American cities sustainability directors who exchange information, collaborate to enhance practice in the field and work together to advance the field of urban sustainability; The project was developed by a partnership between the cities of Boston, Calgary, and Atlanta, with consulting from HDR Decision Economics.

USDN s 110 members represent more than 47 million people Core Members Associate Members 4

TBL Calculator Project s Purpose The purpose of the model is to provide USDN members a tool to: Help understand and be strategic about capital investments in their respective cities; Calculate the impact of strategic investment; Monetize the environmental and social benefits of capital investments.

SROI - Analytical Framework SROI determines the full value of a project by assigning monetary values to all costs and benefits - economic, social and environmental.

USDN Triple Bottom Line Model Future Project PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMS Energy Efficiency (EE) Renewable Energy Transportation Development Social and Human Service TYPES OF INVESTMENT LEED Buildings Modernization EE Programs Wind Solar Other Roadways Transit Bike / Pedestrian Mixed Use Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Brownfield Remediation Social Assistance Education Public Safety DIRECT INPUTS Electricity (kwh) Gas (Therms) Energy (BTU) Water Social Electricity (kwh) Gas (Therms) Energy (BTU) VMT VHT Number of Trips Idling Sq ft Development Passenger Trips Foot Traffic Number Enrolled in Program Cost Savings per enrolled MONETIZED DIRECT OUTPUTS: Economic, Environmental, & Social Economic Energy Costs O&M Costs Environmental Emissions Social Health Impacts Economic Energy Costs O&M Costs Environmental Emissions Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) Social Health Impacts Economic Travel Costs Fuel Consumption VOC Environmental Emissions Social Travel Time Accidents Health Impacts Economic Property Value Transit benefits Agglomeration Impacts Environmental Emissions Social Health Impacts Economic Cost Savings due to program Environmental Social Productivity Health Impacts

SROI vs. Traditional ROI SROI adds to the traditional financial/economic analysis the monetized value of non-cash benefits. Project s Cash Impacts Internal Non-Cash Benefits External Costs & Benefits Capital Operations & Maintenance Productivity Health & Safety Mobility Green House Gases Criteria Air Contaminant Water & Solid Waste LCCA or FROI FROI + Internal SROI LCCA: Life Cycle Cost Analysis FROI: Financial Rate of Return on Investment

Explanation of the S-Curve Diagram

City of Boston s Goals for SROI A commitment from the city to fully track ARRA projects and measure their impact: Money in, money out; Job creation; Economic impact. Provide model for how to assess ARRA projects and augment the city s efforts for transparency in the federal stimulus process.

ARRA In Boston Overview

Evaluating ARRA Projects BUILDING DATA: Square footage, # of employees, HVAC, plumbing, lighting systems ENERGY DATA: kwh s, Therms, gallons of fuel, source of electricity generation LOCATION & SITE DATA: Climatic data, soil types, regulations, landscaping, utilities TRANSPORTATION DATA: VMT s, freight ton-miles, transit, mode choice, accident rates/costs WATER DATA: Potable water use, grey water, stormwater runoff, retention WASTE DATA: Recycling, re-use, efficiency, ecological footprint FINANCIAL DATA: Capital costs, ops & maintenance, discount rate, rebates/incentives ARRA Analysis Tool ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE: Green House Gases, Criteria Air Contaminants, Solid Waste, Water Use, LEED Certification, etc. TOTAL COMBINED IMPACT ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE: Financial AND Sustainable: Net Present Value, Discounted Payback Period, Internal Rate of Return, etc.

ARRA Funding by City Department Department Projects Investment Boston Fire Department 1 $1,384,000 Boston Housing Authority 17 $70,106,821 Boston Police Department 4 $17,530,000 Boston Public Health Commission 1 $602,290 Boston Public Schools 5 $86,108,401 Boston Redevelopment Authority 2 $27,620,000 Boston Transportation Department 5 $43,062,524 Boston Youth Opportunity 1 $249,980 Department of Neighborhood Development 6 $26,934,151 Elderly Commission 2 $347,211 Emergency Preparedness 1 $1,259,820 Energy and Environmental Block Grant 11 $7,503,020 Jobs and Community Services 2 $4,400,000 Management Information Systems 1 $1,900,000 Administration and Finance 1 20,000,000 TOTAL 60 $309,008,218

Sustainable Return on Investment (SROI) Direct sustainability benefits are estimated to be substantial over time, with annual benefits in 2015 of: 34.4 million fewer kwh of electricity consumed; 277,000 reduction of therms of gas used; 23,750 HCF (hundreds of cubic feet) of water preserved; 25,150 fewer tons of greenhouse gas emissions (CO2).

Annual Energy and Environmental Benefits and Cost Savings in 2015* Air Pollutants Savings, $2,972,980, 25% Greenhouse Gases $890,209 7% Economic Value of Water Saved, $178,315, 1% Sewer Bill Savings, $1,337,029, 11% Water Bill Savings, $1,075,355, 9% Energy Bill Savings, $5,687,755, 47% * A total of $12 million in savings

Sustainable Return on Investment Results Department Net Present Value Discounted Payback Period (Years) Internal Rate of Return Benefit-Cost Ratio EE $ 52,394,089 4 35% 3.0 BTD & PW $ 111,398,447 4 38% 6.8 DND $ 1,114,915 13 10% 1.6 BHA $ 43,746,959 2 63% 9.2 TOTAL $ 208,654,409 5 38% 4.5 The aggregate Net Present Value (NPV) is over $208 million with a 4.5 discounted payback period of about 5 years Benefit-cost ratios are estimated to be greater than 1.0 for all departments evaluated, ranging from 1.6 to 9.2 The total Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is estimated to be 38%

Risk Analysis of Boston s ARRA Investments and Sustainability Benefits

Economic Impact Results Boston The economic impact of the $327.6 million investment 1 translates into: 2,126 direct, indirect and induced full-time equivalent (FTEs) jobs in Boston (includes 1,276 direct jobs); $174.3 million increase in Gross State Product; Massachusetts Over project span of 4 years: Total Jobs (Direct, Indirect, and Induced) 2,126 2,861 Gross State Product (2009 dollars) $ 174,253,457 $ 245,947,611 Personal Income (2009 dollars) $ 66,111,927 $ 199,150,693 Total Output (2009 dollars) $ 261,340,716 $ 460,247,615 Personal Consumption Expenditures (2009 dollars) $ 39,043,480 $ 115,863,657 Total State Tax Revenue over 4 years (2009 dollars) $ 3,439,645 $ 10,334,019 $66.1 million of total personal income statewide. 1 SROI analysis of the $327.6 million investment includes $241.2 million from ARRA funds and $86.4 million from leveraged investments.

How the Triple Bottom Line Calculator works

Project will install LEED certified materials and energy efficient equipment in local hospital

Project will install three wind turbines

Project will add bike and pedestrian lanes

Project will create a mixed use neighborhood development with retail and office space

Applications and Next Steps This analysis tells us what these investment are likely to yield for our region in the coming years This type of analysis can also be used to evaluate potential investment decisions Future work will attempt to include the social benefits to complete the third bottom line

USDN URBAN SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORS NETWORK For more information: alvaro.lima.bra@cityofboston.gov