Fundamentals of MITA 3.0 CMS Perspective



Similar documents
Medicaid Information Technology Architecture (MITA) Overview Compiled from MITA Framework 2.0 documents issued by CMS - March 2006

State Medicaid HIT Plan (SMHP) Overview

Enhanced Funding Requirements: Seven Conditions and Standards

MITA Enterprise Transformation. California Department of Health Care Services Using the SS A to Initiate Enterprise Change

Leveraging a Standards- Based Architecture for Health Insurance Exchange & Medicaid Enterprise

A Golden Opportunity for Medicaid IT Transformation:

November 9, 2011 Indiana Family and Social Services Administration

MITA Information Architecture. May 8, 2006

MITA Information Series

emipp Extending Medicaid Connectivity for Managing EHR Incentive Payments Overview

11/7/2013 HARMONIZING & STANDARDIZING BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CLAIMS, DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. Xpio Health. MITA 3.

ecams MITA Alignment May 2011

State Medicaid EHR Incentives and Strategic Developments

Medical Assistance Provider Incentive Repository (MAPIR) - 13 State Collaborative

Vermont s Health Services Enterprise (HSE)

MITA Information Series

Software as a Service Flexible Service Delivery for Your Health Insurance Exchange

HL7 & Meaningful Use. Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International. HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011

Guidance for Exchange and Medicaid Information Technology (IT) Systems

SUMMARY OF HEALTH IT AND HEALTH DATA PROVISIONS OF H.R. 2, THE MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA)

* Please note all participants were placed on mute as they joined the session. Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

CMS AND ONC FINAL REGULATIONS DEFINE MEANINGFUL USE AND SET STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD INCENTIVE PROGRAM

State Medicaid HIT Plan RFP # Responses to Submitted Questions. Section 1.1 of the RFP states in part the following.

Expanded Support for Medicaid Health Information Exchanges

2012 EXTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW (EQR) PROTOCOLS

WHITEPAPER HOW MUCH COMPLIANCE DOES YOUR EHR UNDERSTAND?

Health Information Technology Implementation Advanced Planning Document (HIT IAPD) Template

Anthony Rodgers, Director Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System

CoP for Leveraging Federal Financial Participation (FFP) for Medicaid HIT Activities. September 26, 2014

NYS Medicaid E-Prescribing Incentive Program: Interface with HITECH and Meaningful Use

Medicaid Enterprise Data Governance Approach. MESConference August 21, 2012 Rashmi Menon, Deloitte Consulting LLP

Innovations Committee. Modernizing Medicaid: Medicaid Managed Care Program and Technology Toolkit

HITECH and Meaningful Use - An Overview - To Enrich Lives Through Effective And Caring Service

Guide to Enterprise Life Cycle Processes, Artifacts, and Reviews

Leveraging the Provider Incentive Program for Increased Functionality Beyond Meaningful Use

DY574_261023_br. OMPP MMIS HIPAA 5010 /Edifecs Project. Overview

Updated State Medicaid Health Information Technology Plan (SMHP) October 20, 2014

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Health Resources and Services Administration

Medicaid Eligibility and Enrollment (EE) Implementation Advanced Planning Document (IAPD) Template. Name of State Medicaid Agency:

Medicaid MITA: Innovative COTS solutions for IT Risk Management

State of Vermont. State Medicaid Health Information Technology Plan (SMHP)

Meaningful Use, ICD-10 and HIPAA 5010 Overview, talking points and FAQs

Meaningful Use Stage

Medicaid Project Management

State Medicaid Health Information Technology Plan (SMHP)

MITA to RHIO: Medicaid Enterprise as a Communication Hub. A CNSI White Paper

Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs. Updated November 2015

Health Level Seven International Unlocking the Power of Health Information

For. Planning and Research Related to Procurement of a Systems Integration, Enhancements to a MMIS, New Fiscal Agent, and a Replacement DSS

Information Technology in Support of Health Insurance Exchange, Integrated Eligibility System, and Health Information Exchange

NHSIA Overview. National Human Services Interoperability Architecture (NHSIA) May 2012

SLIDE PRESENTATION NOTES

CMS Physician Quality Reporting Programs Strategic Vision

Behavioral Health MITA. Business Process/Data Model Document Version 1.0. Developed for Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Report to Congress on the Application of EHR Payment Incentives for Providers Not Receiving Other Incentive Payments

State of West Virginia Bureau for Medical Services

Accenture Health and Human Services Software Suite

Office of ehealth Innovation. ehealth Commission Meeting February 17, 2016

Building or Enhancing Interoperability of Human Service Programs with Medicaid Eligibility Systems and Health care Exchanges

Insure Tennessee. What is Insure Tennessee?

Idaho Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Acronyms and Terms

Updated State Medicaid Health Information Technology Plan (SMHP) April 15, 2013

Health Information Technology (IT) Simplified

ARRA HITECH Meaningful Use Objectives & Implications to Public Health Lab

PURPOSE: Provide a brief executive summary describing the intent of this IAPD or IAPD-U.

Frequently Asked Questions about ICD-10

The Meaningful Use Stage 2 Final Rule: Overview and Outlook

Bridging the HIPAA/HITECH Compliance Gap

February 24, 2012 (202) CMS PROPOSES DEFINITION OF STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) TECHNOLOGY

NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES EHR MEDICAID INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS

Six Steps to Achieving Meaningful Use Qualification, Stage 1

[Year] State of Michigan MiHIN Shared Services Operational Plan

The HITECH Act: A Grand Experiment In HIT Implementation and Sustainability. Kim Dunn, MD, Ph.D.

Meaningful Use Stage 2 as it Relates to the Lab Implementing the Public Health Agency Interface. Interface

The Road to Robust Use of HIT: Navigating Meaningful Use and Beyond. by Jennifer McAnally, tnrec Director

EQR PROTOCOLS INTRODUCTION

MEDICAID EHR INCENTIVES PROGRAM Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) For Eligible Professionals

Medicaid Health Information Technology Plan (MHP) FINAL PLAN October 21, 2010 Revised February 3, 2011

State Medicaid ICD-10 Implementation Assistance Handbook

Ross D. Seymour, MTPM

Jessica Kahn, Director, Division of State Systems SOTA Call January 23, 2014

Iowa Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program Environmental Scan Summary. June 24, 2016

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Creating the Foundation for Population Health

Decreasing Complexity and Cost of EHR Adoption John Weir President CAPG Policy Committee Meeting February 23, 2010

CMS Proposes Rule for Electronic Health Record Standards and Specifications

Preventive Treatment for the Provider s Back-office

Session Objectives. Economic Stimulus Package. Electronic Medical Records Evaluation, Selection & Implementation Process

Meaningful Use of EHRs:

Alaska Health Information Technology Operations Plan

Appendix B7. Master Data Management Business and Technical Requirements Solicitation No.: YH Page 229

Testimony of Charles Jarvis, Vice Chair of the HIMSS EHR Association. House Ways and Means Committee, Health Subcommittee

Electronic Health Records and CLIA

Chapter 15 The Electronic Medical Record

ALTARUM. Modernizing Health Care: Leveraging Our Regional Extension Centers

NY Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Eligible Professionals Meaningful Use Stage 2 (MU2) Webinar

TORCH Meaningful Use Assessment Program

The KHIE ConnectionPartnering to Improve Patient Health Outcomes

County of Los Angeles Department of Mental Health Office of the Medical Director Managed Care Division Provider Relations Unit

Leveraging MITA to Implement Service Oriented Architecture and Enterprise Data Management. Category: Cross Boundary Collaboration

Transcription:

Fundamentals of MITA 3.0 CMS Perspective Chuck Lehman Director, Division of State Systems Josh Volosov Health IT Specialist, Division of State Systems

Overview of Changes The MITA Framework incorporates updates and new guidance on several legislative initiatives and directives available 10/2011 HIPAA, ICD 10, 5010, NCPDP, CHIPRA, ARRA, HITECH Affordable Care Act Medicaid Program; Federal Funding for Medicaid Eligibility Determination and Enrollment Activities (90/10 Rule) Enhanced Funding Requirements: Seven Conditions and Standards Guidance for Exchange and Medicaid Information Technology Systems Not released in time for inclusion: Eligibility Changes Final Rule Tentative release expected, Summer of 2012 2

Overview of Changes Revised business process model to include current business procedures and rules Local, regional, and national information exchanges Electronic Health Records (EHR) EHR Incentive Program Registration and Attestation System Health Information Exchanges Health Insurance Exchanges Division of financial activities from operational activities Withheld: Member Eligibility and Enrollment as well as Member Management (8 business processes and capability matrices) Tentative release expected, Summer of 2012 3

Overview of Changes Expansion of current information data standards guidance for Health Care and Health Insurance industries Addition of current technological advancements such as business rules engines, cloud computing, enterprise architecture, and performance monitoring Expansion of technical services and technical standards guidance for Enterprise Architecture Guidance for State Self Assessment, APD Process and MITA Roadmap May continue SS A planning activities and proceed to conduct SS A without Eligibility & Enrollment content 4

Business Architecture 3.0 New content to reflect federal initiatives, programs, and legislation that influence the MITA Framework Expansion of the Concept of Operations for the State Medicaid Enterprise Modification of the Maturity Model Matrix Expansion of Business Process Model to ten (10) business areas and eighty (80) business processes Expansion of Business Capability Matrix to include Level 4 and 5 definitions Guidance for Performance Monitoring MITA 3.0 does not include Eligibility & Enrollment for Member and Member Management business processes (8 business processes withheld) 5

Business Areas and Processes 6

Business Architecture 3.0 Expansion of Business Process Model to ten (10) business areas and eighty (80) business processes Appendix E contains the cross walk between the MITA 3.0 business processes and the MITA 2.01 business processes 7

Information Architecture 3.0 Inclusion of Summary of Components Inclusion of Data Management Strategy (DMS) Expansion of the Conceptual Data Model (CDM) Expansion of the Logical Data Model (LDM) Industry standards are identified as structured data standards or vocabulary data standards Addition of Information Capability Matrix (ICM) 8

Technical Architecture 3.0 Enhanced detail and guidance on how the federal initiatives and other similar legislation change the Medicaid Enterprise Enhanced Technical Management Strategy to include business rules engines, cloud computing, enterprise architecture, and performance monitoring Enhanced Business Services and Technical Services Inclusion of Application Architecture Expansion of Technology Standards to align with Seven Conditions and Standards Addition of Technical Capability Matrix (TCM) 9

New to MITA Framework 3.0 Expansion of acronyms and abbreviations Addition of glossary of MITA terms Addition of MITA At A Glance summary Addition of Quick Reference Guide for topics of interest Addition of Crosswalk from 2.01 to 3.0 business process models Incorporated plain language guidelines from the Plain Writing Act of 2010 10

The Seven Conditions and Modularity Standards Advance the MITA Maturity Level Meet Industry Standards Promote Sharing, Leverage and Reuse Support Business Results Meet Program Reporting Requirements Be Interoperable by supporting seamless coordination and integration 11

Maturity Levels Level 1 Compl ythe mandatory changes but lack technical flexibility. Program changes are costly and time consuming to implement. Level 2 Introduce elements of flexibility in program design and selection of technology driven by requirements to manage costs and implement new programs. Level 3 Focu son adopting national standards, collaborating with other agencies in developing reusable business processes, and promoting one stop shop solutions for providers and consumers. Agencies encourage intrastate data exchange. Level 4 Benefit from widespread and secure access to clinical data and focuses on improvement of healthcare outcomes, empowering beneficiaries and provider stakeholders, measuring objectives quantitatively, and ensuring overall program improvement. Level 5 Focu son fine tuning and optimizing program management, planning and evaluation since it has benefited from national (and international) interoperability and previously noted improvements that maximize automation of routine operations. 12

State Self Assessment 3.0 New Companion Guide with relevant information for conducting the SS A Guidance on assessing As Is and To Be capabilities Guidance on supporting evidence references Information on other uses for SS A results Guidance on MITA Roadmap, Concept of Operations, Business Process Models, and APD Overview Tools such as profiles and scorecard templates Appendix with Seven Conditions and Standards Maturity Model and Capability Matrix 13

Transition Period for Compliance with the Seven Conditions and Standards New MMIS MMIS Development already underway MMIS in Maintenance and Operations

New MMIS If you are planning a new MMIS you should begin that planning now using a SS A. The SS A will be included in the IAPD.

New MMIS Currently in Development You already have an Approved APD for 90% FFP. Within 14 months of the effective date of the Final Rule you need to submit an IAPD detailing how you intend to meet the 7 Conditions and Standards.

MMIS in Maintenance and Operations Within 38 Months of the effective date of the Final Rule you must submit an IAPD with plans to upgrade or modify systems to meet the 7 Conditions and Standards.

Closing Thoughts Continues to be a collaborative effort supported by CMS, States, agencies, vendors and other organizations Provides a common vision for Medicaid programs Remains a Framework Collection of National Resources 18