H.R. 3813 Securing Annuities for Federal Employees Act of 2012



Similar documents
S. 534 National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers Reform Act of 2013

H.R Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2013

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE. Tax Relief Extension Act of 2015

H.R Small Business Loan Modification Program

H.R Five Nations Indian Land Reform Act

H.R Disaster Response, Recovery, and Mitigation Enhancement Act of 2008

S Responsible Homeowner Refinancing Act of 2012

H.R District of Columbia Family Court Act of As ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs on November 14, 2001

CRS Report for Congress

H.R. 475 GI Bill Processing Improvement and Quality Enhancement Act of 2015

Retirement Benefits for Members of Congress

CRS Report for Congress

S. 720 Energy Savings and Industrial Competitiveness Act of 2015

H.R CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE. Asbestos Compensation Act of July 13, 2000

S Safe Explosives Act

H.R. 702 A bill to adapt to changing crude oil market conditions

Retirement Benefits for Members of Congress

H.R Mark-to-Market Extension and Enhancement Act of 2007

S Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003

Federal Employees Retirement System: The Role of the Thrift Savings Plan

H.R Veterans Employment, Education, and Healthcare Improvement Act

H.R. 30 Save American Workers Act of 2015

H.R. 5 Help Efficient, Accessible, Low-cost, Timely Healthcare (HEALTH) Act of 2003

Federal Employees Retirement System: Summary of Recent Trends

Federal Employees Retirement System: The Role of the Thrift Savings Plan

1st Session AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD PROTECTION PROGRAM AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2013

APPALACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

S CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE. International Monetary Stability Act of May 23, As introduced on February 24, 2000.

STATEMENT JOHN O'BRIEN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND POLICY ANALYSIS U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. before the

S National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016

In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, the Board and its employees strongly support this legislation, and we hope that the Congress can approve it quickly.

S Veterans Choice of Representation and Benefits Enhancement Act of 2006

S Veterans Benefits Improvement Act of 2005

November 18, Honorable Harry Reid Majority Leader United States Senate Washington, DC Dear Mr. Leader:

Annual Limit on Elective Deferrals

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE. H.R Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010

Federal Employees Retirement System Act of 1986

Harvard Law School Federal Budget Policy Seminar. Briefing Paper No. 25. Accrual Accounting in Federal Budgeting:

REPORT TO THE CONGRESS

How To Determine The Cost Of A Juror Retirement Plan

June 6, Honorable Elizabeth Warren United States Senate Washington, DC Dear Senator:

SUMMARY OF FERS AND CSRS

The 2004 Report of the Social Security Trustees: Social Security Shortfalls, Social Security Reform and Higher Education

FERS. Federal Employees Retirement System System. (An Overview of Your Benefits) (An Overview of Your Benefits) Insurance. Office of.

March 24, Compare the President's budget proposal with each of the three variations of the CBO baseline;

H.R CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PAY-AS-YOU-GO ESTIMATE. Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001.

INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BENEFITS

President Proposal Calls For Small Government Pay Freeze - Lawful Deductions?

5. Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans: Understanding the Differences

Thrift Savings Plan. Plan Overview. Investment Options. Contribution Limits. Withdrawal Options

November 9, 2011 James Petrick, CFO

CHAPTER 44 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015

Federal Employees Retirement System: The Role of the Thrift Savings Plan

In preparing the February 2014 baseline budget

CSRS Cost-of-Living Adjustments FERS Chapter 2

STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE

Disability Retirement for Federal Employees

Updated Estimates for the Insurance Coverage Provisions of the Affordable Care Act

1st Session AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE SAN GABRIEL BASIN RESTORATION FUND

Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)

SB0001 Enrolled LRB JDS b

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

May 16, The results of our analysis are presented in two documents:

Your Pension Benefits from The City of Atlanta and The Atlanta Board of Education

The GPO predominantly penalizes women educators in California, while the WEP penalizes many individuals who switch careers into public service.

FERS Retirement Benefits. Insurance Programs. Thrift Savings Plan. Social Security Benefits. CSRS / FERS Transfer Retirement Benefits

June 4, Honorable Elizabeth Warren United States Senate Washington, DC Dear Senator:

TECHNICAL NOTE TRANSFERRING US 401K AND IRA ACCOUNTS TO AUSTRALIA

Analysis of PERS Cost Allocation, Benefit Modification, and System Financing Concepts February 14, 2013

CHAPTER 428. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

SECTION ESTIMATING EMPLOYMENT LEVELS, COMPENSATION, BENEFITS, AND RELATED COSTS. Table of Contents

2d Session DANIEL WEBSTER CONGRESSIONAL CLERKSHIP ACT OF 2008

How To Pass A Bill To Make A Bone Marrow Donation Register

Retirement Facts 14. Law Enforcement and Firefighter CSRS Retirement

A BIPARTISAN PLAN TO REDUCE OUR NATION S DEFICITS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

VOLUME 13, CHAPTER 8: NONAPPRORIATED FUND PAYROLL SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES. All changes are denoted by blue font.

The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP): The US Experience with Complementary Pension Funds for Federal Civil Servants

Benefit Reductions in the Central States Multiemployer DB Pension Plan: Frequently Asked Questions

Federal Disability Retirement Guidebook

COMPANY ANNUITY PLANS AND FEDERAL OLD-AGE INSURANCE

United States Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

Railroad Retirement Board: Trust Fund Investment Practices

GOVERNOR S PROGRAM BILL 2011 MEMORANDUM

CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM

CSRS and FERS Benefits Calculator and Retirement Income/Expense Analyzer

COUNTY EMPLOYEES' ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF COOK COUNTY ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31,2011

How To Get A Retirement Plan In Wisconsin Retirement System

Medicare: Changes Made by the Reconciliation Act of 2010 to Senate-Passed H.R. 3590

Thrift Savings Plan. Which Direction is Best for You? 57643d 1108

FY10 Illinois Pension Reform Proposals SURS Implications Fact Sheet 5/22/09

Retirement Savings Plans for Radiologists: Part 1 The Options

Retirement Facts 10. Voluntary Contributions Under the Civil Service Retirement System

Office of Personnel Management Retirement and Insurance Service

Civil Service Retirement System. Retirement Facts 10. Voluntary Contributions Under the Civil Service Retirement System

CHAPTER 6 DEFINED BENEFIT AND DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS: UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCES

Things New Yorkers Should Know About. Public Retirement Benefits in New York State

2d Session RESPA HOME WARRANTY CLARIFICATION ACT OF 2012

CSRS Spouse Benefits - Death of an Employee FERS i Chapter 70

FEDERAL-POSTAL COALITION

Transcription:

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE February 9, 2012 H.R. 3813 Securing Annuities for Federal Employees Act of 2012 As ordered reported by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on February 7, 2012 SUMMARY H.R. 3813 would make several changes to the current retirement system for federal employees. Specifically, the legislation would increase the percentage of salary that federal employees in the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS), and smaller retirement systems are required to pay towards their retirement, make changes to the benefit formula used to calculate retirement annuities for certain employees, eliminate the FERS retirement supplement that would be paid under current law to certain future retirees under the age of 62, and allow employees to contribute to their Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) accounts any payment received for accumulated and accrued annual leave. CBO estimates that implementing the legislation would increase revenues by $42 billion and decrease direct spending by $2 billion over the 2022 period. Pay-as-you-go procedures apply because enacting the legislation would affect direct spending and revenues. H.R. 3813 contains no intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) and would impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments. The bill would impose a private-sector mandate on federal workers under FERS who are eligible by December 31, 2012 to retire and receive an annuity supplement and were not going to do so. Because of a lack of information about the potential behavioral responses of individuals to such a change, CBO cannot determine whether the cost of the mandate would exceed the annual threshold established in UMRA for private-sector mandates ($146 million in 2012, adjusted annually for inflation).

ESTIMATED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT The estimated budgetary impact of H.R. 3813 is shown in the following table. The impacts of this legislation fall within all functions of the budget. By Fiscal Year, in Millions of Dollars 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017 2022 CHANGES IN REVENUES a Estimated Revenues 0 1,163 2,342 3,470 3,977 4,305 4,664 5,060 5,465 5,898 5,807 15,257 42,151 CHANGES IN DIRECT SPENDING b Estimated Budget Authority 0-24 -89-134 -176-213 -242-266 -298-338 -390-636 -2,169 Estimated Outlays 0-24 -89-134 -176-213 -242-266 -298-338 -390-636 -2,169 NET INCREASE OR DECREASE (-) IN THE DEFICIT FROM CHANGES IN DIRECT SPENDING AND REVENUES Impact on Deficit 0-1,187-2,430-3,604-4,153-4,518-4,906-5,325-5,763-6,235-6,197-15,893-44,320 CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION b Estimated Authorization Level 0-1,175-2,353-3,478-3,986-4,315-4,676-5,074-5,481-5,916-5,827-15,306-42,281 Estimated Outlays 0-1,175-2,353-3,478-3,986-4,315-4,676-5,074-5,481-5,916-5,827-15,306-42,281 Memorandum Reduction in Offsetting Receipts Resulting from Lower Employer Contributions c 0 1,175 2,353 3,478 3,986 4,315 4,676 5,074 5,481 5,916 5,827 15,306 42,281 Sources: Congressional Budget Office and Joint Committee on Taxation. a. For revenues, positive numbers indicate a decrease in the deficit. b. For direct spending and changes in spending subject to appropriation, negative numbers indicate a decrease in the deficit. c. Employer contributions are intragovernmental transactions that do not affect the deficit; positive numbers indicate a decrease in offsetting receipts. BASIS OF ESTIMATE CBO estimates that H.R. 3813 would increase revenues by $42 billion over the 10-year period, stemming mostly from changes to the retirement contribution rates for federal employees ($43 billion), offset slightly by lower revenues ($367 million) from a proposal to allow employees to contribute any payment received for accumulated annual leave to their TSP accounts. 2

Proposed reductions in the rates that agencies pay into the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund (CSRDF) on behalf of their employees would reduce spending subject to appropriations by $42 billion over the 2022 period, CBO estimates; those lower payments from agencies would also reduce the amount of offsetting receipts received by the CSRDF; together those changes would have no impact on the deficit. However, since discretionary spending is currently subject to caps through 2021 (as specified in the Budget Control Act of 2011 Public Law 112-25) and the legislation does not reduce those caps, CBO assumes the reductions in such spending would not result in a net decrease in discretionary funding. CBO also estimates that H.R. 3813 would reduce direct spending by $2 billion over the 2022 period, as a result of eliminating the FERS annuity supplement for certain employees who retire before the age of 62 ($1.9 billion) and because of proposed changes to the retirement formula for federal employees ($274 million). Changes in Employee and Agency Contributions H.R. 3813 would increase the required contribution rate paid by federal employees and Members of Congress (in both CSRS and FERS) for their retirement by 1.5 percent of salary, phased in over three years (0.5 percent per year), beginning in January 2013. Under current law, most CSRS employees contribute 7 percent of their salary towards retirement and most FERS employees contribute 0.8 percent. The proposed rate increase would apply to all employees and Members with 5 or more years of federal service as of January 1, 2013. For employees and Members who begin service on that date or later and have less than five years of prior federal service, H.R. 3813 would create a new retirement category of secure annuity employees. Such employees would be subject to a different contribution rate than CSRS and FERS employees: secure annuity employees would be required to pay 4 percent of their salary towards retirement (under current law this group would pay 0.8 percent of salary). A rate of 4.5 percent would apply to certain occupational groups such as law enforcement officers, firefighters, air traffic controllers and nuclear materials couriers who receive a higher pension benefit (the rate for this group under current law is 1.3 percent of salary). For the purposes of this estimate, CBO assumes that the current population of approximately 2.8 million federal employees will be maintained throughout the period. As employees in place as of January 1, 2013, retire or otherwise withdraw from federal service, CBO assumes they would be replaced, in equal number, by secure annuity employees. The estimated annual rate of attrition for the group in place as of January 2013 increases from 17 percent in 2013 to 22 percent by 2022 for CSRS employees. The attrition rate for FERS employees is lower, ranging from 5 percent to 13 percent over the same time period, because of differences in the average age of each group. 3

H.R. 3813 specifies that the following additional retirement systems must conform with the provisions outlined in the legislation: the Foreign Service Retirement System, the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and any defined benefit program that covers employees of the Tennessee Valley Authority. Contributions by federal employees for their retirement are shown as revenues to the federal government; CBO estimates that the increase in the contribution rates proposed in H.R. 3813 would boost revenues by $43 billion over the 2022 period. Federal agencies are also required to make contributions toward their employees retirement. For each of the proposed rate increases for employees described above, H.R. 3813 would make a corresponding reduction in the rate required to be paid by the employing agencies. Reducing the employer contribution rates would lower spending subject to appropriation by $42 billion over the 2022 period. 1 However, this bill or any legislation that would reduce the funds available for a particular discretionary program or that would achieve savings by undertaking a particular discretionary activity would only reduce projected total appropriations if the caps on discretionary spending were also lowered. Without a reduction in the caps, CBO assumes funding for other discretionary programs would fill the gap created by the specific reduction or savings. Changes to the Retirement Annuity Formula For secure annuity employees, H.R. 3813 would make changes to the formula used to calculate retirement benefits. Instead of calculating benefits based on an employee s highest three consecutive years of salary, as under current law, the bill would calculate benefits based on the highest five consecutive years of salary. In addition, the multiplier used in the annuity calculation would be reduced by 0.3 percentage points, from 1.0 percent to 0.7 percent of salary, for most employees. 2 (Special occupational groups have a higher multiplier under current law, but would face the same proportional reduction under H.R. 3813.) The proposed changes in the multiplier and average pay calculations would reduce retirement annuities relative to current law. However, CBO expects that only a small number of secure annuity employees would retire in the 2022 period; we estimate that the resulting drop in direct spending would total $274 million over that 10-year period. 1 The estimated reduction in spending subject to appropriation (from decreased employer contributions) does not exactly equal the increase in revenues (from increased employee contributions) because the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) does not receive funding through the appropriations process. 2 The formula for calculating retirement benefits for most secure annuity employees under H.R. 3813 would be: average high-5 salary * number of years of service * 0.7. 4

Eliminate the FERS Annuity Supplement Under current law, certain FERS employees who retire before the age of 62 receive a supplement to their annuity that is intended to equal what they would receive from the Social Security Administration if they were eligible for Social Security benefits at the time of retirement. The supplement ends when the retiree turns 62 or becomes eligible to receive actual Social Security benefits. H.R. 3813 would eliminate that supplement for all FERS employees other than law enforcement officers, fire fighters, air traffic controllers and nuclear materials couriers who retire after December 31, 2012. Approximately 7,600 new retirees (that are not on the list of exceptions listed above) each year receive an annual supplement of just under $8,000 (inflated in future years to account for increased salaries). As a result, CBO estimates that this provision will lower direct spending by $1.9 billion over the 2022 period. Leave Payout Contributions to the Thrift Savings Plan H.R. 3813 would allow any employee of the federal government who is eligible to make contributions to the TSP to contribute to it any payment received for accumulated annual leave. Such contributions would be subject to the annual limits that otherwise apply annual contributions are currently limited to $17,000 for individuals ages 49 or younger and $22,500 for individuals ages 50 or older. Because income taxes are deferred on contributions to regular (non-roth) TSP accounts, and earnings within the accounts would not be taxable, the anticipated increase in contributions would initially result in lower revenues from income taxes. The staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the legislation would reduce revenues by $367 million over the 2022 period. PAY-AS-YOU-GO CONSIDERATIONS The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 establishes budget reporting and enforcement procedures for legislation affecting direct spending or revenues. The net changes in outlays and revenues that are subject to those pay-as-you-go procedures are shown in the following table. 5

CBO Estimate of Pay-As-You-Go Effects for H.R. 3813, as ordered reported by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Affairs on February 7, 2012. By Fiscal Year, in Millions of Dollars 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017 2022 NET INCREASE OR DECREASE (-) IN THE DEFICIT Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Impact 0-1,187-2,430-3,604-4,153-4,518-4,906-5,325-5,763-6,235-6,197-15,893-44,320 ESTIMATED IMPACT ON STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS H.R. 3813 contains no intergovernmental mandates as defined in UMRA and would impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments. ESTIMATED IMPACT ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR The bill would impose a private-sector mandate on federal workers under FERS who are eligible by December 31, 2012 to retire and receive an annuity supplement and were not going to do so. The cost of the mandate would be the income some employees would forego as a result of losing the option to retire at a later date and draw the annuity supplement. Because of a lack of information about the potential behavioral responses of individuals to such a change, CBO cannot determine whether the cost of the mandate would exceed the annual threshold established in UMRA for private-sector mandates ($146 million in 2012, adjusted annually for inflation). ESTIMATE PREPARED BY: Federal Costs: Amber G. Marcellino Impact on Federal Revenues: Joint Committee on Taxation Impact on State, Local, and Tribal Governments: Elizabeth Cove-Delisle Impact on the Private Sector: Paige Piper/Bach ESTIMATE APPROVED BY: Theresa Gullo Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis 6