Liz Strand & Ann Jensen Texas State University-San Marcos



Similar documents
4 STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT Stage 1 Dependency and Inclusion o Inclusion o Dependence o Lack of structure o Centralized communication o High conformity

CED 117 Interpersonal Skills in Human Relationships (3 Sem Hours) Department of Education and Clinical Studies Fall, 2015 Online Education

Outcomes Assessment and Program Improvement Master of Business Administration

! SOME SLIDES BASED ON AL DAVIS 3992 SLIDES FROM SPRING What s the point? This class is really about two things:

Peer Reviews of Teaching A Best Practices Guide California State University, Northridge

Los Angeles Harbor College. DISTANCE EDUCATION SURVEY RESULTS August Prepared by: The Office of Institutional Research

UW-La Crosse Online Course Evaluation Guidelines

Envisia Learning 360 Feedback Online Project Flow Process

Communication Program Assessment Report

Research Proposal: ONLINE VERSUS FACE-TO-FACE CLASSROOM: EVALUATING LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS FOR A MASTERS LEVEL INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN COURSE

Software Engineering Teams. Software Requirements & Project Management CITS3220

Human Development and Learning in Social and Educational Contexts (EDP 201) Spring 2012 Syllabus

Online Graduate Program in Human Services Administration

Libraries and Educational Technologies Professional & Performance Development Form Library Faculty Self Evaluation

Strategies for Effective Online Teaching

Critical Thinking in Online Discussion Forums

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER Special Topics: Root Cause Analysis for Interprofessional Team Members.

Shared Solutions: An Overview Special Education Policy and Programs Branch Ministry of Education

Student Feedback on Online Summer Courses

PBS TeacherLine Course Syllabus 1

360 Degree Feedback Report. Harry Trout

CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE SYLLABUS FOR SPCH 1318 INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION. Semester Hours Credit: 3 INSTRUCTOR: OFFICE HOURS:

Tending the Fire: Facilitating Difficult Discussions in the Online Classroom

Unit 3: Building Community and Collaboration

Best Practices and Review Standards for Online Instruction. Recommended Best Practices for Online Instruction

Master of Arts Programs in the Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences

Towards Active Team-Based Learning: An Online Instructional Strategy

The Impact of Team Building on Communication and Job Satisfaction of Nursing Staff

HECAT: Chapter 5 curriculum fundamentals

Faculty Strategies for Balancing Workload When Teaching Online

Section Five: Instructional Programs 510R SCHOOL COUNSELING (REGULATIONS)

Creating Rubrics for Distance Education Courses

Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed

PRACTICUM HANDBOOK Community and College Student Development. The College of Education & Human Development UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

Heritage University M.Ed. in Counseling

Staff Performance Evaluation Training. Office of Human Resources October 2014

OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mechanical Engineering Program Assessment October 16, 2008 INTRODUCTION PROGRAM MISSION STATEMENT

Shaw University Online Courses FAQ

Online Course Syllabus MSM639 Employee Relations & Performance Management

Graduate Student HANDBOOK. Rehabilitation Counseling Program

Oak Park School District. Administrator Evaluation Program

Blended Course Evaluation Standards

Performance Management and Evaluation for Administrators and Technical Professionals

Master s in Educational Psychology. School Counseling Track

THE ROLE OF THE SCHOOL COUNSELOR

Psychologist uses a limited number of psychological instruments with little or no flexibility to evaluate students.

Practicum and Internship Manual COUN 505 and COUN 588 Master of Science Program in Rehabilitation Counseling. Updated 3/21/2011

Increasing Student Success through Quality Assurance by Kristina Kauffman and Andy Howard

Project Human Resource Management. Overview of PMBOK Basics

National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009)

School Psychology Program Goals, Objectives, & Competencies

Evaluation System for Classified & Management Support Staff

Gonzaga University Virtual Campus Ignatian Pedagogical Approach Design Portfolio (IPA) Updated: October 15, 2014

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA. Online Course Design Guidelines for Faculty

1. Instructional Design Elements a. Support & Resources Essential Criteria: 1. Students are provided information as to where to get technical help.

Presenters. OSU Online NP Programs. OSU CON Cyber Evaluation NONPF 1

SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT REPORT

Engaging students in online courses

GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS

Group Development. How do groups change over time? Inga Carboni, 9/04

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School-Based Occupational Therapists

ACC Performance Excellence Program (PEP)

Accounting X120C Intermediate Accounting, Theory and Practice (Online)

Post Master s School Counseling Specialization

CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS

Policy for On-line Teaching and Learning

THE CHECK. academic. A Guide to Online Course Design. What aspects of course design does The Check address? How can The Check be used?

Project Management Tools and Leadership (MIS3886) Spring 2016 Course Syllabus

Roles, Responsibilities and Expectations for Developing and Teaching Online Courses in Continuing and Distance Studies

Online Course Proposal Form Form 1

Justification For Certification Program for Teaching Online. Daniel Aguilar Jose Banda Maria Eugenia Perez

BACHELOR OF SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM SOCW 400B ADVANCED SEMINAR IN REFLECTIVE SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE COURSE OUTLINE

Employee Evaluation. 5= Outstanding: Performance is extraordinary and exceptional. (Outstanding ratings should only be awarded on rare occasions.

Interpersonal Relationships & Team Building. Buffy Kelly MT(ASCP) Huron Consulting Group

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

1. The teacher candidate sets learning targets that address the Essential Academic Learning Requirements and the state learning goals.

Transcription:

Liz Strand & Ann Jensen Texas State University-San Marcos June 10-15, 2012 Growing Community; Growing Possibilities

Why doesn t the system work when I need it to! It s a hassle trying to schedule online meetings. I feel like I m doing most of the work! My teammates have different experiences and good ideas. I like sharing the workload. I plan to network with my teammates after graduation. Goal: Improve attitudes towards online teamwork 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 2

Clarify challenges of collaborative assignments Explain interventions designed to address challenges Describe the context in which the interventions were applied Summarize the evaluation Share future directions 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 3

Masters of Social Work 100% online program (19 courses) Administrative leadership (rather than direct practice) High demand for program = skilled students Students are in a cohort 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 4

Relevant and valued by students Open-ended Require interdependence Include rubric and assessment plan 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 5

Asynchronous discussion forum (Sakai CLE) Adobe Connect 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 6

Preprogram module Teamwork tips Socialization discussion Team charter Teammate /self evaluation Research-based Implemented during 2010-2011 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 7

Face-to-face and online courses Collaborative and interpersonal skills 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 8

Preprogram module Teamwork tips Socialization discussion Team charter Teammate/self evaluation Assigned upon acceptance Technologies and strategies 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 9

2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 10

2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 11

2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 12

Preprogram module Teamwork tips Socialization discussion Team charter Teammate/ self evaluation Referenced within courses Technology suggestions 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 13

2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 14

2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 15

Preprogram module Teamwork tips Socialization discussion Team charter Teammate/ self evaluation Process past team experiences Get to know teammates 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 16

Forming Who are we? What are we doing? Storming How do we feel? What do we want? Norming Agree on leadership, procedures and goals. Performing Get to work and produce an outcome/product Tuckman, Bruce W. (1965) 'Developmental sequence in small groups', Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399. 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 17

2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 18

Pre-program module Teamwork tips Socialization discussion Team charter Teammate/ self evaluation Team goals Rules of engagement Conflict management plan 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 19

2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 20

2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 21

Group Norms: Be present and prepared for online communications in a timely manner. Treat each other with respect and provide their undivided attention. Maintain communication via email/forums. Post to the forum in a timely manner (within 48 hours). Make the group a safe place for reflection and honest feedback. Uphold confidentiality. Stay on task and meet deadlines established by the group and the course. Distribute the workload evenly with all group members. Group Goals: Be more technologically savvy. Build rapport with group members. Respect each other in all communications. Give and receive positive/constructive feedback to all group members. Create a safe environment for the free expression of ideas, beliefs, and feelings. Actively participate in all group activities. Conflict Resolution: If there is a conflict between individual group members, these individuals will speak to one another directly with the upmost respect in order to attempt to reconcile the conflict. If a conflict between these individuals cannot be resolved by the involved parties, the group may attempt to resolve the conflict together. If the individuals and the group are unable to resolve the conflict, a mediator (the instructor) will be contacted for assistance in resolving the conflict. 22

Preprogram module Teamwork tips Socialization discussion Team charter Teammate/ self evaluation Strategically timed May include group process evaluation 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 23

2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 24

Challenges for student teams Develop successful teamwork assignments Strategies to manage and support teams Technology suggestions 25

All students: Pre-program module Teamwork tips 6 courses: Assigned project plans, presentations All 6 used socialization discussion and team charter Only 3 courses used teammate/self evaluations 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 26

Attitudes toward teamwork Pre/Post Survey: 16 questions address Teamwork orientation (Do I think teamwork is a valuable skill?) Volition (Do I think I have the skills and abilities to work effectively on a team?) Effectiveness of interventions Student Perceptions Survey: 6 questions Anecdotal: Student and faculty observations 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 27

Paired t-test showed no statistical difference Population too small 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 28

Effectiveness Questions Disagree=1 to Agree=4 SOWK 5329 Sum 10 SOWK 5329 Sum 11 SOWK 5339g Fall 11 SOWK 5339f Spring 10 SOWK 5316 Spring 11 SOWK 5322 Fall 10 My team and I were able to work effectively together to complete the team assignments. The conflict resolution plan helped reduce problems amongst team members. The team norms or charter helped us function successfully as a team. 3.53 3.5 3.33 3.53 3.95 3.60 3.63 3.42 3.60 3.91 3.8 3.42 3.91 3.85 Because my instructor was aware of progress on team assignments and issues amongst team members, my team worked more effectively. 3.33 3.38 3.42 3.33 3.80 3.11 Rate how team assignments contributed to your understanding of the course content (1 = low to 4 = high). 2.73 3.42 2.73 3.91 3.45 29

I have to say, I loved my group members. Team norms and conflict resolutions were beneficial so that there was never any misunderstanding of how things were to run. My group members did not stick to the group norms on several occasions, and my efforts to build group cohesion were never fully realized. I believe it is because my group members are from a different cohort than myself, so I felt like an outsider and the "momma hen" most of the time. Vocalizing our expectations upfront made things easier. Yes, the team did honor the norms and showed respect and consideration to each other. We also asked each other for clarification if needed and worked together to deal with issues we had with formatting, etc. 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 30

I think it made a difference for them. I will require this in the future, because I think it makes a difference. I did require them to turn in to me their contracts [charters] with each other and I think that helped a lot. The groups ran more smoothly when they created a team charter. 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 31

Pre-/post program survey (versus course) Consistent implementation across courses What technologies did students use? Continued faculty training Continued technology exploration 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 32

Faculty Form heterogeneous student teams (within same area code) Provide average of peer ratings with comments Option to include peer-assigned points in final grade Students Form ad hoc groups (OAE) Synchronous authoring and drawing (Google Docs?) Synchronous meetings (Big Blue Button) Shared document repository (OAE) * Already in OAE 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 33

Other collaborative tech tools? Experiences on your campus? Suggestions for research/future directions? 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 34

Ann Jensen Aj14@txstate.edu Liz Strand es22@txstate.edu Texas State University-San Marcos 2012 Jasig Sakai Conference 35