How To Settle A Lawsuit Against A Bakery



Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. WHEREAS: Plaintiff, the United States of America, has

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv KMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2011 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 320 Filed: 04/16/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2754 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case l:ll-cv yk Document 15 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : ORDER

F.S.B. v. Equity Title of Nevada; Case No.2: 12-cv ("Action''). The Settling Defendant

FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT

Settlement Agreement. This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into between and among (i) the

Case5:09-cv JF Document30 Filed03/04/10 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Windmill Inns of America, d/b/a Windmill Inn of Ashland, Defendant.

Case4:14-cv JSW Document38-1 Filed01/21/15 Page1 of 13

The State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S

Case4:13-cv SBA Document40 Filed10/14/14 Page1 of 11

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Page 1 of 8

CONSENT OF DEFENDANT PAUL W. JENNINGS

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS KANSAS CITY-LEAVENWORTH DIVISION

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS 3rd DIVISION CONSENT JUDGMENT

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:06-cv FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11

BEFORE THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Case 5:07-cv JKG Document Filed 05/15/13 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case5:12-cv EJD Document55-4 Filed05/01/14 Page1 of 19 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT

Plaintiffs, -against- IAS Part 5 Justice Kathryn E. Freed. WHEREAS Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York

Case 4:11-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

SCREEN SPECIALISTS and RICHARD REUSCH, individually, stipulate that the ultrasound. are prescription devices as cleared for marketing by the

Case 2:13-cv ES-JAD Document Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 4861 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE No. 09-CV JCC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV JST (MEJ)

Case 3:14-cv H-JMA Document 1 Filed 03/24/14 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

/J.'llf-cv-2-olo/- IZ1

This Settlement and Release Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of this_ day of. IU:CI'rALS

Case No. CV Plaintiff, the State ofidaho, Department of Finance ("Department"), and Defendant, Bart

Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia Policy Statement Effective date: 12/14/2000 Page 2

THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C.

NO. ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE. COME NOW, THE STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through Attorney General GREG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEW YORK CITY FALSE CLAIMS ACT Administrative Code through *

Case 2:14-cv JAM-KJN Document 10 Filed 06/05/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-cv Document 2-1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

United States District Court Southern District of Florida. Case No. -Civ- -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv PBS Document 1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO.: 8:13-cv-1647-T-23TGW ORDER

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Errors and Omissions Insurance. 1.0 Introduction and Definition

I Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 106 cd 503

COpyFORCERTIFICATION

Case 1:15-cv WSD Document 3 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT' COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Case No. I: IS ~c.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

How To Get The Lesser Prairie Chicken To Live Outside Of The Coon Line

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2013 Page 1 of 5

Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Transcription:

07/27/00 THU 14:16 FAX 2025148395 DOJ EES-6 141002 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MEYER'S BAKERIES, INC., Defendants. Plaintiff, the United States of America, by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States and through the undersigned attorneys, acting at the request of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA" commenced this action by filing a Complaint with this Court on the - day of, 2000. The United States filed its Complaint pursuant to the Clean Air Act ("CAA", 42 UB.C. 7401 et seq., against Meyer's Bakeries, Inc., (IlMeyer's" or "Defendantll, seeking the award of civil penalties fotdefendant's violations of the industrial refrigerant repair, testing, recordkeeping, and reporting regulations at 40 C.F.R. Part 82, Subpart F, 82.152-82.166, ("Recycling and Emission Reduction", promulgated pursuant to Subchapter VI of the CAA ("Stratospheric Ozone Protectionll, 42 V.S.C. 7671-7671q, at its facilities located in Hope, Arkansas; Orlando, Florida; Wichita, Kansas; Cleburne, Texas; and Arizona City, Arizona. The Parties agree that it is in their respective best interests to resolve this matter without

07/27/00 THlT 14:16 FAX 2025148395 DOJ EES-6 141003 further litigation. The Parties by th.eir respective undersigned attorneys, and/or representatives, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. In settlement of the United States' claims under Section 113 of the CAA, 42 U.S.c. 7413, alleged in the Complaint filed in this action, Defendant shall pay to the United States a civil penalty in the amount of Three Million- Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000, within thirty (30 days of the date this Stipulated Settlement and Order of Dismissal ("Stipulated Settlement" is entered by the Court. 2. Payment of this sum shall constitute full settlement and satisfaction of all claims against Defendant for civil penalties on behalf of the EPA as set foith in the United States' Complaint. 3. Payment shall be made by Electronic Funds Transfer ("EFT", in accordam::e with instructions provided by the United States Attorney's Office for the Western District of Arkansas, P.O. Box 1524, Ft. Smith, Arkansas 72902. Instructions for payment may be obtained by telephoning the United States Attorney's Financial Litigation Unit at (501 783-5125. Copies of the electronic funds transfer and transroittal1etter, which shall reference the Department of Justice case number 90-5-2-1-06120, shall simultaneously be mailed, via first class ma.il, to the following persons: RichaId Bartley, Esq. Chief, Air, Pesticides & Toxics Enforcement Branch Office of Regional Counsel United States EPA, Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 2

07/27/00 THU 14:17 FAX 2025148395 DOJ EES-6 4ZJ004 and Chief,Environmental Enforcement Section Environment and Natura.l Resources Division United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044 4. If payment is not made when due, Interest shall accrue, at the statutory interest rate in accordance with 28 D.S.C. 1961, on any amount overdue. Iflnterest is due, Defendant shall submit a statement with the payment to the Financial Litigation Unit of the United States Attorney's Office for the Western District of Arkansas, at the address listed above, setting forth the calculation of interest due. Personnel from the United States Attorney's Office, Financial Litigation Unit will advise Defendant in the event such calculation requires adjustment. 5. In the event that Defendant fails to pay the amount specified in Paragraph 1 when due, then, in addition to the Interest required by Paragraph 4 of this Stipulated Settlement, Defendant shall pay a Stipulated Penalty of Twelve Thousand-Five Hundred Dollars ($12,500 per day for each day that payment is not paid in full 6. If Stipulated Penalties are due, Defendant shall pay same either by (a certified or cashier's check if less than $50,000, or (b Electronic Funds Transfer ("EFT", in accordam:e with instructions provided by the United States Attorney's Office for the Western District of Arkansas, ifrnore than $50,000. Payments made by certified or cashier's check shall be payable to "Treasurer, the United Sta.tes of America" and tendered to the United States Attorney's Office, for the Western District of Arkansas, P.O. Box 1524, Fi. Smith, Arkansas 72902. 7. Defendant shall be liable for attorneys' fees and costs incurred by the United States in collecting any amounts not paid when due under this Stipulated Settlement. 3

07/27/00 THU 14:17 FAX 2025148395 DOJ EES-6 141005 8. Ifpayment is not made when due, the United States reserves the right to move this Court to vacate this Stipulated Settlement and reinstate this action. 9. Upon entry of this Stipnlated Settlement. the United States shall be deemed a judgment creditor for purposes of couection"ofthe civil penalty, Interest and Stipulated Penalties, if any, and enforcernen"t of this Stipulated Settlement in accordance with Rule 69 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and other applicable federal authority. 10. This Stipulated Settlement is limited to the civil claims under the Clean Air Act, as alleged in the Complaint and is not intended to, nor shall be construed to, operate in any way to resolve any civil claims other than those set forth in the Complaint or any criminal liability of Defendant. 11. Nothing in this Stipulated Settlement shall be construed to release Defendant or its "agents, successors, or assigns from their respective obligations to comply with any applicable Federal, State, or loeallaw, regnlation, or permit. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prevent or limit the United States' rights to obtain penalties or injunctive relief under the CAA or other Federal statutes or regulations for other alleged violations. 12. Execution ofthi$ Stipulated Settlement does not constitute an admission of any fact or legal and/or equitable Jiability of Defendant. 13- The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of interpreting and enforcing this Stipulated Settlement. 14- There are no separate agreements or understandings with respect to this matter which have not been set forth in this Stipulated Settlement. 15. Except as set forth in Paragraph 6 of this Stipulated Settlement, each party shall bear 4

07/27/00 THU 14:17 FAX 2025148395 DOJ EES-6 I4J006 its own costs and attorney's fees in this action. 16. The undersigned representatives of Defendant, and the Assistant Attorney General, certify that each is fully authorized to enter into the tenns and conditions of this Stipulated Settlementand to legallybind the party he or she represents to this document. 17. Defendant consents to the entty of this Stipulated Settlement and Order of Dismissal without further notice. As stipulated and agreed to by the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED AND ENTERED thisday of.2000. United States District Judge Western District of Arkansas United States v. Meyer's Bakeries, Inc. Civil Action No. Western Disn-ict of Arkansas 5

07/2J/00 THU 14:17 FAX 2025148395 DOJ EES-6 [4J007 FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: DATED: LOIS J. SCHIFFER Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division DATED: KIRK W. KOESTER Trial Attorney Environmental Enforcement Section Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 (202 514-9009 DA TED: P. K. HOLMES United States Attorney Western District of Arkansas P.O. Box 1524 Ft. Smith, Arkansas 72902 STIPULA TED SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL United States v. Meyer's Bakeries, Inc. Civil Action No. Western District of Arkansas 6

~27/00 THU 14:17 FAX 2025148395 DOJ EES-6-141 008 FOR THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY - HEADQUARTERS: AlJG 8 2000 DATED: ~ ft1wen -. HERMAN 1::L Assistant Administrator Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance 1200PeIUlsylvaniaAvenue, N.W. Ariel Rios Building, Room 3204 Washington, D.C. 20004.. United States v. Meyer's Bakeries, Inc. Civil Action No. Western District of Arkansas 7

07/27/00 THU 14:18 FAX 2025148395 DOJ EES-6 141009 FOR THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY -REGION VI: t/bl(6 DA TED: <IA'f/ DATED: 07 Assi~ant Regional Counsel U.S. Environmental Prptection Region VI 1445 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 United Slales v. Meyer's Bakeries.~tJ!J.. Civil Action No. Westem District of Arkansas 8

07/27/00 THU 14:18 FAX 2025148395 DOJ EES-6 '141010 FOR THE UNITED STATES ENV1RONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY -REGION IV: rj "2. "SflA c0 DATED: United States EPA Region IV Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 -? /~3 /;;J..8~-o ~ LEIYP AL ------.-. Assistant RJgicmal Counsel U.S. Environmental Protection Ageocy Region IV Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 United StiJtesv. Meyer's Bakeries, tj!l. Civil Action No. Western District of AIkansas 9

07/27/00 THU 14:18 FAX 2025148395 DOJ EES-6 141011 FOR THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY-REGION VII:..3/~~ /6 ( ~~ J. ~ DATED DENNIS GRAMS, P.E. Regional Administrator United States EPA Region VII 901 North 5th Street Kansas City, Kansas 66101 ~ DATED ~I'(L f(. d-f~iy1(jztnr MA THA R. STEiNCAMP Regional Counsel United States EPA Region VII 901 North 5th Street Kansas City, Kansas 66101 United States v. Meyer's Bakeries. ~ ~ civil ~ction No. Western District of Arkansas 10

07/27/00 TEll 14:18 FAX 2025148395 DOJ EES-6 '141012 FOR THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY -REGION IX: 3/301 tfv ~z;-. DATED: FELICIA. MARCUS Regional Administrator United States EP A Region IX 71 S Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 ~~ ~ _..:LS-~LYi DATED: ~ ANN LYONS Assistant Regional Counsel U.S. Environmental Protection Agel.1c;y Region IX 715 Hawthom.eStreet San Francisco, California 94105 United States v. Meyer's Bakeries,~J!l. Civil Action No. Western District of Arkansas 11

o~~o~~og. ~_li:44 F~~--2q2~14~~~~_. DQ.LI?~~-~---- -- - --- 14I..2. _~n "-../,"-.,.--,., 7l1u~ DA.TED: 'M:eycE"1 lac. /hltr /i 6~}-JrJo Jb~ SEAL QIARI..138 ~1~nBS1DENI" DATED = ~. B8k.arias.1!11=. ~~ SEI'1'\.BNEMT AJiDOJt,IEK OPNSMIJ~~ u.iii:iiisi8ia 1Ir. :ld:0j"'"~ IDA OGAdial!Ib. Wa8Cra Dl8ttsat~ 3.2