State Meat and Poultry Inspection (MPI) Program Laboratory Quality Management System Checklist



Similar documents
NIST HANDBOOK 150 CHECKLIST

Luminus Devices, Inc Luminus Testing Laboratory Quality Management Systems Manual

Quality Management System Policy Manual

ISO/IEC QUALITY MANUAL

OD-2017-Ed.1.5 CHECK LIST FOR TESTING AND CALIBRATION LABORATORIES

NABL NATIONAL ACCREDITATION

Checklist. Standard for Medical Laboratory

OMCL Network of the Council of Europe QUALITY MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

Testing Facility Laboratory Manual

Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC)

TITLE: Quality System Manual DOCUMENT NUMBER: QMS

EPA NATIONAL LEAD LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM. LABORATORY QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS (LQSR) REVISION 3.0 (November 05, 2007)

REQUIREMENTS FOR AN ACCREDITED VETERINARY MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY

1 For more information T: / E: DAP@ul.com / W: ul.com/dap

Quality Assurance Manual January 2008 Revision I Revision date of 01/17/13. Pi Tape Corporation. 344 North Vinewood St. Escondido CA USA

MEAT GRADING AND CERTIFICATION BRANCH QUALITY MANUAL

CORPORATE QUALITY MANUAL

LAB 37 Edition 3 June 2013

Example of a food company quality

Non-Controlled Copy. Quality Manual Revision Log. Rev # Date Description

The purpose of this Supplier Quality Standard is to communicate the expectations and requirements of Baxter Healthcare Corporation to its suppliers.

ONTIC UK SUPPLIER QUALITY SURVEY

ALACC Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

COPY. Revision History: Changes were made to reflect the current practice of only including the most recent changes in the revision history.

ISO 9001:2008 Audit Checklist

Section i POLICY AND AUTHORITY STATEMENT

Gap Analysis of ISO 15189:2012 and ISO 15189:2007 in the field of Medical Testing

ISO 9001:2000 Gap Analysis Checklist

EUROLAB Cook Book Doc No. 13 ELECTRONIC RECORDS

Supplier Quality Assurance

Company Quality Manual Document No. QM Rev 0. 0 John Rickey Initial Release. Controlled Copy Stamp. authorized signature

Revision Date Author Description of change Jun13 Mark Benton Removed Admin. Manager from approval

NIST HANDBOOK CHECKLIST CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING

COMPLIANCE BY DESIGN FOR PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORIES INSIGHT FROM FDA WARNING LETTERS

ISO 9001 Quality Systems Manual

ISO 9001:2000 AUDIT CHECKLIST

COMPANY NAME. Environmental Management System Manual

QUALITY MANUAL GREAT LAKES INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES. October 2008 Revision 08

CENTRIS CONSULTING. Quality Control Manual

RTP s NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Cartel Electronics. AS 9100 Quality Systems Manual

Quality Management Plan Procedure

Procedure for Conducting Audits and Management Reviews

SUPPLIER QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE

Analytical Laboratories, Inc.

P07 CALA Application of Requirements in ISO/IEC 17025:2005 Revision 3.4 April 9, 2014

FMC Technologies Measurement Solutions Inc.

R103 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: PROFICIENCY TESTING FOR ISO/IEC LABORATORIES

0. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Software Verification and Validation

Table of Contents 1. SCOPE APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS TERMS AND DEFINITIONS QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM...4-8

QUALITY MANUAL ISO Quality Management System

Good Research Practice

Quality Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS APPROVAL SIGNATURE PAGE AMENDMENT RECORD SCOPE EXCLUSIONS 2.1 3

ISO and SANAS guidelines for use of reference materials and PT scheme participation Shadrack Phophi

OMCL Network of the Council of Europe QUALITY MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

Micro Plastics, Inc. Quality Manual

Uncontrolled Document

A Guide for Documenting the Management System for a Testing/Calibration Lab. May 2015

Turbo Resources International Quality Procedure

AVNET Logistics & EM Americas. Quality Manual

THERMAL INSULATION MATERIALS

VENDOR QUALIFICATION APPROVAL FORM

PRODUCT CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Quality Assurance Manual for Low Level Radioactive. Waste Disposal Facility

How DCMA Helps To Ensure Good Measurements

OH&S Management Systems Audit Checklist (NAT, E3)

ISO 9001:2008 QUALITY MANUAL. Revision B

Quality Management System Manual

ISO 9001 (2000) QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REPORT SUPPLIER/ SUBCONTRACTOR

Internal Quality Management System Audit Checklist (ISO9001:2015) Q# ISO 9001:2015 Clause Audit Question Audit Evidence 4 Context of the Organization

Reflection paper for laboratories that perform the analysis or evaluation of clinical trial samples

Row Manufacturing Inc. Quality Manual ISO 9001:2008

Quality Management System MANUAL. SDIX, LLC Headquarters: 111 Pencader Drive Newark, Delaware 19702

GENERAL WELDING & FABRICATING, INC. 991 Maple Road Elma, New York 14059

GLOBAL AEROSPACE PROCEDURE

NC SBI QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Rev: Issue 4 Rev 4 Quality Manual AOP0101 Date: 10/07/13. Quality Manual. CBT Technology, Inc. 358 North Street Randolph, MA 02368

ORACLE CONSULTING GROUP

Quality Manual. DuraTech Industries, Inc Commerce Street La Crosse, WI MANUAL SERIAL NUMBER 1

WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY AUDITING GUIDELINES

The Prophotonix (UK) Ltd Quality manual

Internal Audit Checklist

Sargent Controls & Aerospace 5675 West Burlingame Rd. Tucson AZ PHONE: (520) FAX: (520)

Quality Agreement Template

ALL PRODUCTS MFG & SUPPLY

Union County. Electronic Records and Document Imaging Policy

AN AUDIT QUESTIONNAIRE THAT EXAMINES SPECIFICALLY THE MANAGEMENT OF TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES CLAUSES IN ISO 15189

Quality Management System

Recognition of my Product (Testing Laboratory) Why I need recognition, what is the effect?

Jonathan Wilson. Sector Manager (Health & Safety)

DEC STD ISO Quality Systems - Model for Quality Assurance in Production and Installation

ISO 9001:2015 Internal Audit Checklist

North Carolina State Crime Laboratory Quality Manual

NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS. (Fairmont and Montreal Facilities) QUALITY MANUAL. Prepared to comply with the requirements of ISO 9001:2008

SUPPLIER QUESTIONNAIRE

Quality Management Systems Manual

Quality Management System MANUAL. SDIX, LLC Headquarters: 111 Pencader Drive Newark, Delaware 19702

Transcription:

This checklist is intended to help laboratories improve the quality of their testing programs with regard to meat and poultry testing samples, in order to ensure those laboratories are at least equal to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service Field Service Laboratories. The laboratory management should strive to ensure that policies and procedures are written and each laboratory meets the elements listed herein. All quality system documentation and supporting records must be available for the assessor's review. PROGRAM: LABORATORY NAME: LABORATORY ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: LABORATORY DIRECTOR: LABORATORY REPRESENTATIVE(S) AT REVIEW: REVIEWER(S): DATE OF REVIEW: IF USED AS A SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL, PARTICIPATING LABORATORY PERSONNEL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT TO FSIS ON REQUEST. IS THE LABORATORY ACCREDITED TO ISO/IEC 17025? Yes No ARE ALL METHODS USED BY THE LABORATORY IN SUPPORT OF THE MPI PROGRAM INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION? Yes No NOTE: THE REMAINDER OF THE CHECKLIST NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED AS A SELF ASSESSMENT ONLY IF THE ANSWER TO ONE OR BOTH OF THESE QUESTIONS IS NO. INSTRUCTIONS FOR FSIS AUDITOR(S): 1. To ensure a complete and thorough audit of the laboratory system, review copies of all scope laboratory methods and test kit inserts prior to the on-site review. Checklist(s) specific to the method(s) being audited may be used to help facilitate the audit. 2. Answer all questions on this checklist by placing a circle around the appropriate response or by filling in the blank. Responses are based on observations or on information supplied by laboratory personnel. Questions pertaining to services, equipment, instruments, methods or procedures not used routinely by the laboratory should be marked not applicable (NA). 3. Questions are phrased so that the compliant response to most questions would be "Yes" or "NA." 4. For on-site audits, after completing the checklist and before leaving the laboratory, the auditor(s) shall inform laboratory management (or their representative) of any non-conformances found, as well as any improvements that may be needed. 5. Following each review, the auditor(s) shall prepare a formal written report, which will be forwarded to the audited laboratory for their review and corrective action response. Page 1 of 11

A. MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES 1. Does the laboratory have a quality management system to meet the requirements of FSIS and the regulatory authorities of the state? 2. Does the laboratory quality system cover all work carried out at sites away from its permanent facilities and/or in associated temporary or mobile facilities, as well as all work carried out in the laboratory s permanent facilities? 3. Does the laboratory have a written policy that identifies the responsibilities, authority and interrelationships of all key personnel who may influence or be involved in the testing activities of the laboratory in order to prevent any potential conflicts of interest? 4. Does the laboratory have managerial and technical personnel with both the authority and the resources needed to carry out their duties? 5. Does the laboratory have managerial and technical personnel with both the authority and resources to identify departures from their quality system and to initiate actions to prevent or minimize any such departures? 6. Does the laboratory have procedures in place to ensure that all of its personnel, including management, are free from any undue internal and external pressures and influences that may adversely affect the quality of their work? 7. Does the laboratory have procedures for controlling all documents that form part of its quality system (e.g. regulations, methods, software, instructions, standards, and manuals), including procedures for: a) Ensuring prior approval of all documents? b) Ensuring periodic review of all documents? c) Ensuring that any changes to documents are approved? d) Ensuring that only the current revision is being used? e) Ensuring suitable markings of retained obsolete documents? Page 2 of 11

8. Does the laboratory subcontract work, only to other laboratories that are either accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 standards for that work, or meet the essential elements of this checklist for that work? 9. Is a record maintained of all such subcontractors, along with evidence of their stated accreditation or compliance? 10. Does the laboratory verify that supplies comply with the standard specifications or requirements defined in the methods concerned? 11. Does the laboratory have policies and procedures detailing the acceptable handling of nonconforming work or any departures from the policies and procedures in either their quality system or technical operations: a) That identify the responsibilities and authorities for the management of nonconforming work? b) That identify the actions to be taken when nonconforming work is identified (including the halting of work and withholding of test reports, as necessary)? c) That require corrective actions be taken immediately, together with any decision about the acceptability of the nonconforming work, including notifying the client (if necessary)? d) That include the monitoring of results to ensure that the corrective actions taken have been effective? e) That identify needed improvements and potential sources of nonconformance, and do they take preventive action to reduce the likelihood of the occurrence of such nonconformances? Page 3 of 11

12. For the purposes of establishing an audit trail does the laboratory have procedures in place for the following steps, as they pertain to technical and quality records, including original observations, derived data, test reports, calibration records, staff records, internal audit reports, management reviews, corrective and preventive actions, as well as any other information: a) collection of said records? b) identification of said records? c) storage of said records? d) access to said records? e) maintenance of said records? f) disposal of said records? 13. Are all records legible, held secure and in confidence for defined period (retention schedule) and in such a way that they are readily retrievable, and are they retained in a suitable environment to prevent alteration, damage, deterioration, and/or loss? 14. Does the laboratory have procedures to ensure that any mistakes occurring in records are not deleted, or otherwise made illegible, but instead are crossed out and the correction entered alongside, with the person making the correction, signing or initialing and dating the change? 15. Does the laboratory have procedures to ensure that all observations, data, and calculations are recorded at the time they are made and are identifiable to a specific task? 16. Do the observations, data and calculations contain sufficient information to help facilitate identification of factors that may either affect the uncertainty and/or enable the test to be repeated under conditions as near to the original as possible? Page 4 of 11

B. TECHNICAL GUIDELINES 17. Does the laboratory have policies and procedures for identifying training needs and providing training of personnel? 18. Are training/education/experience records for all technical personnel available? 19 Does the laboratory have policies and procedures to ensure that the environmental conditions do not invalidate the test results or otherwise adversely affect the required quality of any measurement or test (for example, maintaining separation between areas with incompatible activities, ensuring good housekeeping in the lab, and where applicable, monitoring environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity, biological sterility, and dust)? 20 Does the laboratory have policies and procedures to ensure that only authorized test methods and procedures, fit for purpose are used, and that any deviation from these methods occurs only if said deviation is technically justified, authorized, validated, and documented? 21. Does the laboratory have policies and procedures to validate/verify the performance of authorized methods as written, and to ensure confirmation of this fact prior to using the methods? 22. Does the laboratory have procedures to ensure that all calculations and data transfers are subject to appropriate checks in a systematic manner? 23. Does the laboratory have procedures to ensure that any computer software developed by the user is validated before use? 24. Does the laboratory have policies and procedures to ensure that all equipment and software used for testing, calibration, and sampling is uniquely identified, capable of achieving the accuracy required, and, prior to being placed into service, complies with the specifications relevant to the tests and/or calibrations concerned? 25. Does the laboratory have procedures to ensure the proper use and planned maintenance of all equipment, and to ensure that any defective equipment (e.g. equipment outside Yes Page 5 of 11

specified limits) is removed from service and clearly labeled as out of service? 26. Are records for this equipment and software maintained and do they include at least the following: a) The identity and unique identification of the equipment and/or software? b) User instructions (preferably manufacturer's instructions)? c) Checks that the equipment complies with the required specifications? d) Dates, results and copies of reports and certificates of all maintenance, calibrations, and adjustments, including any damage, malfunction, modification or repair to the equipment? 27. Does the laboratory have policies and procedures for the calibration of its equipment and the use of reference standards and materials, and do they include at least the following: a) Calibrations performed prior to being placed in service? b) Instructions for the safe handling, transport, storage and use of reference standards and reference materials in order to prevent contamination or deterioration and in order to protect their integrity? c) Are certified reference cultures (CRC) traceable to a nationally or internationally recognized type culture collection (e.g. ATCC) or reference cultures (RC) from laboratory sources identified for key biochemical and physiological characteristics relative to standard reference sources used? d) Are these CRCs and RCs transferred no more than 5 times to maintain their biochemical reaction and physiological characteristic integrity before being replaced or re-identified for key biochemical and physiological characteristics using nationally or internationally recognized reference sources? No NA Page 6 of 11

28. For those laboratories responsible for sample collection: a) Does the laboratory have policies and procedures for sampling, based on appropriate statistical methods? b) Are traceability records maintained for this sampling that include identification of the sample, identification of the sampler, the environmental conditions, and the identification of the sampling location (where necessary)? 29. Regarding the receipt, handling, protection, storage, retention and/or disposal of samples, does the laboratory have procedures in place that include at least the following systems for: a) Ensuring that samples and their associated records can be uniquely identified and retained throughout their lives in the laboratory? b) Recording, upon receipt of the samples any abnormalities or departures from normal or specified conditions? c) Avoiding deterioration, loss or damage to the samples during storage, handling and preparation? d) Providing (where necessary) secure storage that protects the condition and integrity of the samples (or portions) concerned? 30. Does the laboratory have quality control procedures for monitoring the validity of all tests undertaken to include, but not limited to, the following: a) Regular use of certified reference materials, cultures and/or internal quality controls using secondary reference materials? (if available). b) Replicate tests using duplicates of the same sample (chemistry). c) Confirmation testing by a cultural method when a screen method indicates a presumptive positive. (microbiology) d) Confirmation testing by an alternative test method or detection system when a screen method indicates a positive result. (chemistry) Page 7 of 11

31. Does the laboratory: a) Participate in interlaboratory comparison or proficiencytesting programs where available or an intralaboratory proficiency testing program (See 9CFR requirements for certain chemical testing). b) Use quality control samples with each batch run? 32. Does the laboratory have policies and procedures to ensure that the results of each test or series of tests carried out by the laboratory are reported accurately and in accordance with any specific instructions listed in the test method or as otherwise instructed? 33. Do laboratory sample records contain at least the following, thus ensuring traceability: a) Unique identification of the personnel preparing samples and performing tests. b) The name of the laboratory, or other unique identification or description, of where testing was carried out. c) Identification of the method used for the testing, along with any deviations from or additions to the test method? d) Any appropriate dates associated with the testing (i.e. sample receipt date, testing date(s), etc.)? e) The name(s), title(s), and signature(s) (or other equivalent identification) of person(s) approving the release of test data for reporting. f) In records containing the results of sampling, the date and location of the sampling, along with clear identification of the material sampled? Page 8 of 11

List of Methods Laboratory Uses in Support of the FSIS MPI Program Page 9 of 11

Comments: Attach additional page if needed. Page 10 of 11

Instructions for Completing the Form 1. Enter the information requested. Answer all questions on the checklist by placing a circle around the appropriate response or by filling in the blank. If additional space is needed, write see attached in the space after the question and attach any separate sheets of paper to the form. Questions pertaining to services, equipment, instruments, methods or procedures not used routinely by the laboratory should be marked not applicable (N/A). 2. The question requirements are related to the laboratory services in support of the State MPI Program only. These requirements do not apply to testing performed under other programs. 3. Submit the completed form electronically to: e-mail: statelabinquiry@fsis.usda.gov or as a completed hardcopy to: Director, Laboratory Quality Assurance Staff USDA, FSIS, OPHS, LQAS 950 College Station Road Athens, Georgia 30605 Phone: (706) 546-3559 Page 11 of 11