This is Superfund. A Community Guide to EPA s Superfund Program



Similar documents
Before beginning any construction or demolition activities at your construction site,

Performance Management for Environmental Remediation Projects. William C. Lattin, PMP US Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office

How To Understand And Understand Solid And Hazardous Waste

FUDS PROGRAM GUIDANCE TO IMPLEMENT ARMY INTERMIM POLICY FOR INTEGRATING NATURAL RESOURCE INJURY RESPONSIBILITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE ACTIVITIES

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Agency Washington, DC September 2007 O ce of Solid Waste and Emergency Response

Site Cleanup in Connecticut

Federal Facility Cleanup. Reggie Cheatham, Director Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office

RCRA Corrective Action Workshop On Results-Based Project Management: Fact Sheet Series

Incorporating Greener Cleanups into Remedy Reviews

Environmental laws have been enacted to protect natural resources and the public health. A number

The EPA's Superfund Remediation of Oil Spill Sites

CHAPTER VI OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL STATUTES

EPA Superfund Actions and ATSDR Public Health Data. July 1995 OTA-BP-ENV-156

GASB Statement 49 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations Implementation Issues in a Question and Answer Format

Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable Arlington, VA November 14, 2013 Jim Woolford, Director Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology

HAZARDOUS WASTE / MATERIALS GIS DATASETS and OTHER DATABASES

Report on the Need for New York to Refinance the Superfund

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Summary of Frequently Asked Questions and Answers: The Asarco Settlement and Bunker Hill Superfund Cleanup

Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup

FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT MASON COUNTY LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE LUDINGTON, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY, 2001

Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. ECO Update. The Role Of Natural Resource Trustees In The Superfund Process

Chapter 10. Overview of Federal Laws and Regulations Governing Incineration

The BoRit Asbestos Piles, Ambler, Pennsylvania Lenny Siegel February, 2007

Environmental Site Assessments

Module 1 Overview of the Site Assessment Process Under CERCLA

Citizen Suit Provisions. Restoring Hazardous Landscapes! Science, Justice, and Law! Declaration of National Environmental Policy

Wyckoff/Eagle Harbor Site Bainbridge Island, Washington

Site Description and History

INTRODUCTION TO GREEN & SUSTAINABLE REMEDIATION: THREE APPROACHES

Chapter 5: Spills Response

Use of Alternate Concentration Limits (ACLs) to Determine Cleanup or Regulatory Levels Under RCRA and CERCLA

CDPHE. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, the State agency responsible for hazardous waste site compliance and oversight.

Federal Actions to Address Impacts of Uranium Contamination in the Navajo Nation

The Comprehensive Environmental Response,

DRAFT. GROUNDWATER REMEDY COMPLETION STRATEGY: Moving Forward with Completion in Mind

The Comprehensive Environmental Response,

Getting Started - More Information:

Program Overview. BOSC Homeland Security Subcommittee Meeting August 25, 2015

Wisconsin Ready for Reuse Program Petroleum Loans & Grants

AGENCY SUMMARY NARRATIVE

BJC/OR-271 Guidance for Conducting Risk Assessments and Related Risk Activities for the DOE-ORO Environmental Management Program

About Pure Earth and the Toxic Site Identification Program

Massachusetts Brownfields Program: An Overview

SECTION A - 2 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS REGULATIONS

2006 Standard Application Processing Time. 10 months. 14 months

RE-Powering America s Land Initiative Management Plan

Top 10 Questions to Ask When Buying a Superfund Site

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT. Principles for Ground Water Pollution Prevention and Remediation

Former Public Health Service Building Action Plan

Making and Implementing Environmental Laws. Teacher s Masters California Education and the Environment Initiative

Prepared for ENRY2000, Belgrade, Yugoslavia, September 27, 2001

Occupational Safety and Health Administration Directorate of Whistleblower Protection Programs (DWPP) Whistleblower Statutes Desk Aid

NASA Stennis Space Center Environmental Resources Document

Office of Environmental Quality Five Year Strategic Plan July, June 2022

CITY OF POMPANO BEACH Broward County, Florida

WHO WILL PAY FOR THE PORTLAND HARBOR CLEANUP?

Environmental Management Plan

Environmental Issues & Public Affairs

Pesticide Spills. Chapter 26. In This Chapter. Keywords. Accidents. Pesticides Act and Environmental Protection Act

DEVELOPMENT DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST

Rutgers Environmental Health and Safety

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENT QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN PART III: SUPERFUND (MACA) PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Environmental Law Primer. Adapted from Vermont Law School s Environmental Law Primer for Journalists

Federal Environmental Requirements for Construction Projects

ESSENTIALS OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW. Craig B. Simonsen, Paralegal Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contaminants of Concern Exposure Pathways

Case Study 3 Conservation Chemical Company, Kansas City, Missouri, EPA Region 7

NAPCS Product List for NAICS 54162: Environmental Consulting Services

Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Emphasis on Groundwater May 4, 2004

Chapter 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Park Operations

Table of Contents for Section 8

consulting engineers and scientists

Robert D. Trimborn Airport Director Santa Monica Airport

Occupational Safety and Health Administration Directorate of Whistleblower Protection Programs (DWPP) Whistleblower Statutes

Health Consultation MID-AMERICA TANNING COMPANY SERGEANT BLUFF, WOODBURY COUNTY, IOWA EPA FACILITY ID: IAD FEBRUARY 17, 2005

Guide to Tank Insurance

WCD LITIGATION SUPPORT AND CLAIMS EXPERIENCE

Brownfields. Technical Report # 7

Current Statistics Northern Tier Pennsylvania. Number of Jobs 5,700 94,600 Average Earnings Average industry earnings per worker includes benefits

Intervention on behalf of Denmark, Norway and Ireland on the occasion of the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals meeting on

Environmental Protection Agency

NRDA PROCEDURES AND TERMS

Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance

Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) What Does It Mean and How Do I Do It? Stephanie Vaughn, USEPA Region 2 Laura Knudsen, USEPA HQ, Superfund CIPIB

USEPA Risk-Based Standards for Controlling Contaminated Sites Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) April 2, 2007 Aaron Yeow, USEPA

Overview of Proposition 1 TRACIE BILLINGTON, CHIEF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BRANCH DIVISION OF INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT

Description Purpose Health Education. Health Assessment. Outcomes of the program Partners Contact Information

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

Sec. 22a-1a page 1 (4-97)

Carson River Mercury Superfund Site Management Strategies and Goals. May 2011

Environmental Health and Safety Management Plan

CONTRACTOR ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY 101. Violation of environmental laws may result in fine or imprisonment or both.

ACTIVITY NAME. Training Requirements for Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) 40 CFR Part 112 Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Texas

2. determining that land is not contaminated land and is suitable for any use, and hence can be removed from the CLR or EMR, as relevant.

SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUNTER MEASURES PLAN (SPCC)

FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY STATEMENT

Transcription:

This is Superfund A Community Guide to EPA s Superfund Program

IF THERE IS A SUPERFUND SITE in your neighborhood, you are probably wondering, what will happen? and, what can I do? This brochure will give you a better understanding of the Superfund process and ways you and your community can be involved, including important topics such as: What is Superfund? Discovering Superfund Sites Taking Action to Clean Up Polluted Sites Responsibility for Superfund Site Cleanup Getting Involved: You and Your Community The Superfund Process Making each Superfund Cleanup Greener Maintaining the Site Cleanup Over the Long-Term Deleting a Site from the National Priorities List Valley of the Drums, KY 1979 Love Canal, NY 1978 2

What is Superfund? For a variety of reasons, hazardous commercial and industrial wastes have been mismanaged and may pose unacceptable risks to human health and the environment. This waste was dumped on the ground or in waterways, left out in the open, or otherwise improperly managed. As a result, thousands of hazardous waste sites were created throughout the United States. These hazardous waste sites commonly include manufacturing facilities, processing plants, landfills and mining sites. In 1980, Congress established the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, in response to growing concerns over the health and environmental risks posed by hazardous waste sites. This law was enacted in the wake of the discovery of toxic waste dumps such as Love Canal and Valley of the Drums in the 1970s. CERCLA is informally called Superfund. The Superfund program is administered by EPA in cooperation with state and tribal governments. It allows EPA to clean up hazardous waste sites and to force responsible parties to perform cleanups or reimburse the government for cleanups led by EPA. Superfund was established in 1980 by an act of Congress, giving EPA the funds and authority to clean up polluted sites Goals of Superfund: Protect human health and the environment by cleaning up polluted sites Involve communities in the Superfund process Make responsible parties pay for work performed at Superfund sites 3

Discovering Superfund Sites Superfund sites are discovered when the presence of hazardous waste is made known to EPA. The presence of contaminants is often reported by residents, local, state, tribal or federal agencies, or businesses. Sometimes these hazardous wastes are found by EPA during inspections or investigations into complaints. National Response Center (NRC) You can call NRC toll-free at 800-424-8802 to report potential releases of hazardous substances and oil 24-hours a day, seven days a week. You can report potential releases of hazardous substances and oil to the NRC as well as to your state, tribal and local authorities. The NRC is the national point of contact for reporting all oil, chemical, radiological, and biological releases into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Taking Action to Clean Up Polluted Sites There are two basic types of responses that EPA uses to manage polluted sites: Removal Actions: Used to handle emergency oil spills or chemical releases and short-term responses. Emergency actions are taken to eliminate immediate risks and ensure public safety. Examples of such emergencies are chemical releases at a fixed location or during transportation. EPA may respond to help state and local authorities deal with these emergencies quickly. Remedial Actions: Used to handle complex sites needing a long-term response. Remedial actions manage releases that do not pose an urgent threat to public health or the environment and do not require immediate action. Remedial actions involve complex and highly contaminated sites that often require several years to study the problem, develop a permanent solution, and clean up the hazardous waste. These are the sites that most people think of when they hear about the Superfund program. 4

Responsibility for Superfund Site Cleanup Potentially Responsible Party (PRP): From the time the site is discovered, EPA tries to identify the generators and transporters of the hazardous waste and the owners and operators of a site. These people/companies/municipalities are considered PRP(s) under Superfund and are asked to conduct and/or pay for cleanup studies and activities. If the PRP(s) refuses to participate, EPA will clean up the site and sue the party or parties to recover costs. State/Tribal Government Involvement: Their involvement in Superfund has grown over the years, and states and tribes are now involved in virtually every phase of cleanups. Superfund requires EPA to coordinate with states and tribes when the federal government leads cleanup operations, and allows states, tribes, and local governments to lead cleanup efforts using Superfund money if they have the necessary technical and management expertise. Getting Involved: You and Your Community EPA s Superfund Community Involvement Program provides individuals affected by hazardous waste sites with information and opportunities to participate as active partners in the decisions that affect the Superfund sites in their community. The community has a voice during all phases of the Superfund process, and plays an important role in assisting EPA with gathering information about the site. Your involvement is very important. You have the opportunity and the right to be engaged in, and to comment on the work being done at sites in your community. Superfund Community Involvement staff strive to: Keep the community well-informed of ongoing and planned activities Encourage and enable community members to get involved Listen carefully to what the community is saying Collaborate with the community to address concerns Incorporate community input into planned actions Explain to the community what EPA has done and why Attend public meetings Review/comment on site decision documents (where applicable) Participate at information sessions Ways YOU Can Get Involved Join/form a Community Advisory Group (CAG) Contact the site s Community Involvement Coordinator (CIC) 5

The Superfund Process EPA encourages and engages in community involvement throughout the Superfund process. Look for the throughout this brochure for ways you and your community can be involved in the Superfund process at your site. Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection (PA/SI) Once a site is identified, EPA looks at existing information, inspects the site, and may interview nearby residents to find out the history of the site and its effects on the population and the environment. EPA also normally tests the soil, water and air to determine what hazardous substances were left at the site and how serious the risks may be to human health and the environment. EPA may take early action at a site if there is a need for quick risk reduction, and enough site information and data available to take action. Early actions are taken before the site has been characterized fully, and usually address a portion of a site, often as a removal action. For example, EPA may take early action to provide an alternative water supply to residents who are affected by contaminated drinking water, while the PA/SI process continues throughout the site. Additionally, these sites often require long-term actions such as restoring contaminated ground water or taking measures to protect wetlands, animals, and other ecological resources. In contrast to early actions, long-term cleanups are complex and may take many years to complete. Depending on the situation, EPA may conduct various community involvement activities during the PA/SI phase. These activities may include meeting with local officials and opinion leaders, conducting community interviews or planning an informal community meeting. EPA may also prepare fact sheets, contact local media, establish an information repository and designate an EPA Community Involvement Coordinator (CIC). In addition, the community may provide any information it has about the site to EPA. The Technical Assistance Services for Communities (TASC) program helps communities understand the technical issues related to site activities, hazardous substances, and sampling results. This technical assistance is available to help you understand and review the information gathered at the site throughout the Superfund process, beginning with PA/SI. 6

The National Priorities List The National Priorities List (NPL) is a published list of hazardous waste sites in the country that are eligible for federal funding to pay for extensive, long-term cleanup actions under the Superfund remedial program. How Do Sites Get On the NPL? To evaluate the dangers posed by hazardous waste sites, EPA developed a scoring system called the Hazard Ranking System (HRS). EPA uses the information collected during the assessment phase of the Superfund process to score sites according to the danger they may pose to human health and the environment. Many of the sites that are reviewed do not meet the criteria for federal Superfund cleanup action. Some sites do not require any action, while others are referred to the states, other programs, other agencies, or individuals for cleanup or other action. If a site has a high enough score on the HRS and meets all other criteria, EPA may propose that it be put on the NPL. The proposal is published in the Federal Register, the official publication of the U.S. government, and the public has an opportunity to comment on whether the site should be included on the NPL. EPA responds to comments and if applicable, announces the decision in the Federal Register. After a site is added to the NPL, EPA is required to conduct community interviews and to develop a Community Involvement Plan (CIP). EPA must also establish and maintain an information repository and administrative record and inform the public of the availability of these document archives. Technical Assistance Grants (TAG) provide money for activities that help community groups participate in decision making at eligible Superfund sites. TAGs are available at Superfund sites that are on the NPL or proposed for the NPL, and for which a response action has begun. EPA must notify the public when a site in their community qualifies for a TAG. 7

Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Once a site is placed on the NPL, further investigation into the problems at the site and the best way to address them is required. This is called a Remedial Investigation (RI) and the Feasibility Study (FS). The RI usually involves gathering and analyzing numerous samples of soil, surface water, ground water, and waste from locations throughout the site and near the site borders. The RI also involves assessing risks posed by the site. The analysis of potential treatment methods or cleanup alternatives" is called a FS. During the FS, the advantages and disadvantages of each cleanup method are explored. Choosing a Cleanup Plan After all of the cleanup alternatives are developed, EPA recommends the option it considers best for the site and offers it to the community for evaluation and comment in a Proposed Plan. A Proposed Plan does the following: Summarizes cleanup alternatives studied in the FS Includes information on the site history, community participation, the nature and extent of the contamination, and the reasonably anticipated future land uses at the site Highlights EPA s recommended cleanup method EPA provides the public with an opportunity to comment on the Proposed Plan in writing or in person, and hosts a public meeting to discuss the recommended cleanup method. EPA prefers cleanups that will allow for reuse of the site if possible. Community input at this phase is critical to making good choices. EPA provides a responsiveness summary of the written and oral comments the public has made and the Agency's responses to those comments. 8

Record of Decision (ROD) The cleanup method ultimately chosen for the site, and the reasons for the selection, are set forth in the ROD. The ROD is a document that is available to the public and explains all the activities that occurred prior to selection of a cleanup method, and describes how the cleanup method will be protective of human health and the environment. It also contains the responsiveness summary and shows how those comments were factored into the final decision. Remedial Design (RD) The RD is the phase during which the plans for the cleanup method are carefully designed. The RD is based on the cleanup method described in the ROD. As the plans for constructing the cleanup are developed and reviewed, more sampling may be needed to further define the location and amount of contamination. EPA may provide the public a fact sheet and hold a briefing describing the final remedial design. Remedial Action (RA) The RA starts the actual cleanup at a site. For example, the cleanup method may involve building wells to inject chemicals or organisms into the soil that will break down the contamination. The RA phase is similar to building a house. Those responsible for the cleanup obtain all the materials needed and follow the plans that were developed during the RD phase. During the RA phase, construction equipment will be operating on site to conduct the cleanup. During the RA phase, the community should be informed about the work to be done including planned work hours, truck traffic, and health and safety precautions. RI/FS: Data collection & analysis ROD: Cleanup method selection and specification 9 RD/RA: Cleanup planned and conducted

Making each Superfund Cleanup Greener The process of cleaning up a hazardous waste site uses energy, water, and other natural or materials resources, thereby creating an environmental "footprint" of its own. EPA strives to conserve natural resources, minimize waste generation, and reduce energy consumption to improve the environmental performance of Superfund activities while protecting human health and the environment. Opportunities to decrease the environmental footprint and maximize the environmental outcome of a cleanup exist throughout a project life, and can include actions such as utilizing renewable energy to power site operations and reducing total air emissions by discouraging construction truck engine idling. Returning Sites to Productive Use As early in the process as possible, EPA works with communities through an array of communication techniques and partnerships to help to return sites to productive uses. These uses can be industrial or commercial, such as factories and shopping malls. Some sites can be used for housing, public works or healthcare facilities, transportation, and other community infrastructure. Sites could also be redeveloped as recreational facilities such as golf courses, parks and ball fields; or for ecological resources, such as wildlife preserves and wetlands. Sites could even be used for generating energy from renewable sources such as wind turbines or solar panels. No matter what use is appropriate for a site, the community benefits from restoring the site to productivity, because the property can once again add to the economic, social, and ecological value of the community. Work with EPA, your local government, and your community to plan the redevelopment of the site. Explore the redevelopment ideas and resources provided by EPA. 10

Maintaining the Site Cleanup Over the Long-Term After EPA determines that the physical construction at a site is complete, activities are put in place to ensure that the cleanup actions will protect human health and the environment over the long-term. For example, these activities may include routine maintenance at the site such as making sure signs and fences are intact or soil treatment systems are running smoothly. EPA is also required to conduct a review of the site cleanup every five years. This Five-Year Review may include examining site data, inspecting the site, taking new samples, and talking with affected residents about site conditions, problems or concerns. EPA is required to notify the community and other interested parties when a Five-Year Review will be conducted at the site. Deleting a Site from the NPL EPA may delete a site or portion of a site (sometimes called an operable unit) from the NPL if all cleanup goals have been met and no further cleanup action is required to protect human health and the environment. EPA publishes a notice of its intention to delete the site, or portion of the site, from the NPL in the Federal Register, and notifies the community of the opportunity for comment. EPA then accepts comments from the public and formally responds to public comments received. If, after the formal comment period, the site or portion of the site still qualifies for deletion, EPA publishes a formal deletion notice in the Federal Register and places a final deletion report in the administrative record for the site. Learn More on the Web! EPA Superfund homepage: www.epa.gov/superfund/ TAG: www.epa.gov/superfund/community/tag/ TASC: www.epa.gov/superfund/community/tasc/ Superfund Job Training Initiative (SuperJTI): www.epa.gov/superfund/community/sfjti/ Superfund Redevelopment: www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle/index.html Superfund & Green Remediation: www.epa.gov/superfund/greenremediation/ 11

EPA Regional Superfund Community Involvement Offices EPA wants to remain accessible and responsive to your concerns. Our community involvement staff is available to answer any questions regarding a Superfund site or an area you think may be a site. Here is a list of EPA s Regional Superfund Community Involvement Offices. Region 1 888-372-7341 Region 2 800-346-5009 Region 3 800-553-2509 Region 4 877-718-3752 Region 5 800-621-8431 Region 6 800-533-3508 Region 7 800-223-0425 Region 8 800-227-8917 Region 9 800-231-3075 Region 10 800-424-4372 www.epa.gov/superfund/community United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-11-021 August 2011