Developing a Risk-Based Cloud Strategy Trevor Simmons, ZigZag Associates Ltd David Stokes, Venostic Consulting 23rd April 2015, Chertsey 1
Introductions Tell us briefly Who you are Who you work for What experience you and/or your organization have had with Clouded data/applications Non-GxP? Low Risk? High Risk? 23rd April 2015, Chertsey 2
Background Cloud Computing is here to stay Recognised by the regulators Of some concern to the regulators The question is no long whether to Cloud The questions are What to Cloud? Who to Cloud with? Organisations need to develop a Cloud Strategy 23rd April 2015, Chertsey 3
Discussion How has Cloud worked out for you? How much have you Clouded? What have you Clouded? What sort of Cloud models are you using? What problems have you encountered? Have the promised cost savings emerged? 23 rd April 2015, Chertsey 4
Exercise Overview Let s review the capabilities of five different cloud services providers Look at the business requirements for deploying five new platforms / applications In five groups we ll consider a different platform and will define 1. The service model you might look to utilise 2. How the cloud service providers would be assessed What questions would you ask / verify? 3. What your final cloud services model looks like
Cloud Infrastructure as a Service NIST definition The capability provided to the consumer is to provision processing, storage, networks, and other fundamental computing resources where the consumer is able to deploy and run arbitrary software, which can include operating systems and applications. The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure but has control over operating systems, storage, and deployed applications; and possibly limited control of select networking components (e.g., host firewalls).
Cloud Platform as a Service NIST definition The capability provided to the consumer is to deploy onto the cloud infrastructure consumer-created or acquired applications created using programming languages, libraries, services, and tools supported by the provider. The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, or storage, but has control over the deployed applications and possibly configuration settings for the applicationhosting environment.
Cloud Software as a Service NIST definition The capability provided to the consumer is to use the provider s applications running on a cloud infrastructure. The applications are accessible from various client devices through either a thin client interface, such as a web browser (e.g., web-based email), or a program interface. The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, storage, or even individual application capabilities, with the possible exception of limited user-specific application configuration settings.
Private Cloud NIST definition The cloud infrastructure is provisioned for exclusive use by a single organization comprising multiple consumers (e.g., business units). It may be owned, managed, and operated by the organization, a third party, or some combination of them, and it may exist on or off premises.
Community Cloud NIST definition The cloud infrastructure is provisioned for exclusive use by a specific community of consumers from organizations that have shared concerns (e.g., mission, security requirements, policy, and compliance considerations). It may be owned, managed, and operated by one or more of the organizations in the community, a third party, or some combination of them, and it may exist on or off premises.
Public Cloud NIST definition The cloud infrastructure is provisioned for open use by the general public. It may be owned, managed, and operated by a business, academic, or government organization, or some combination of them. It exists on the premises of the cloud provider.
Hybrid Cloud NIST definition The cloud infrastructure is a composition of two or more distinct cloud infrastructures (private, community, or public) that remain unique entities, but are bound together by standardized or proprietary technology that enables data and application portability (e.g., cloud bursting for load balancing between clouds).
Risk Considerations GxP Significance Data Integrity / Protection Protection of Intellectual Property General Security / Access Controls
Platform A - Extranet Your regulated company is looking to deploy a new SharePoint platform (document libraries, lists, calendars, work sites etc.) Requirements are defined including GxP significant functionality, including a repository for GMP electronic documents, CAPA lists etc Collaborative working with Contract Manufactures Future requirements are undefined, but manufacturing, QA and sales/marketing are all stakeholders in the project
Platform B Adverse Events Signal Detection Following recent MHRA regulatory enforcement action your regulated company is looking to implement a new AE signal detection platform Needs to analyse data from multiple databases including manufacturing records, CAPA records, complaints, AERS and social networking sites You have a team of requirements analysts ready to start work with a technical development team and the project will be managed by your own IT department Requirements are defined but no COTS solution will fulfil the requirements (even with customisation)
System C Enterprise Resource Planning Your regulatory company is soon to begin manufacturing your first parenteral product with very specific and complex QA release, identification and storage requirements As a small start up you have limited funds to implement a new ERP system A number of commercial ERP systems can be configured to meet your requirements The traditional route of working with a system integrator and hosting internally looks expensive Time is of the essence the patent clock is ticking
System D Clinical Data Warehouse Your regulatory company is struggling to analyse data from across multiple clinical trials It has been decided to implement a new clinical trials data warehouse based on CDISC standards with a suite of analytical tools Your review of the market has identified two potential vendors with COTS products Vendor 1 has a very professional data centre and a SaaS solution, but will not modify their SaaS solution to meet your specific process workflow requirements Vendor 2 also cannot meet your specific workflow needs out-ofthe-box but has a suite of development tools and PaaS offering which you can use to extend their solution. However, they have no IaaS or SaaS offering.
System E CRM System Your medical devices company sells diagnostic instruments and consumables aimed at the home care market and is starting to provide patient care services as part of a new revenue generation plan Your need a new CRM systems for the new patient care division to manage Traditional sales call management Sample management Call centre (including complaints management) Patient records You have identified three CRM systems that can be configured to meet your needs, but they are the most expensive on the market Investment funds are limited
Your Mission... Get into a like minded group to discuss a system / challenge that interests you Discuss how Cloud can be leveraged as part of your solution Think about how you will assess potential Cloud service providers What will to ask / check Consider the following 5 Cloud Service Providers 23rd April 2015, Chertsey 19
Remember As the consumer you can look to any Cloud service model you like On-Premise or Off-Premise IaaS, PaaS or SaaS Private, Community, Public or Hybrid Your model could leverage more than one Provider Costs savings are an objective Off-Premise generally has lower investment costs than On- Premise Private is more expensive than Community and both are more expensive that Public
Cloud Service Provider 1 Internal IT department within the regulated company Fully compliant IT quality management system, with trained staff and all IT infrastructure is fully qualified Already managing a number of highly critical, validated GxP significant applications Limited experience with virtualised infrastructure and no formal experience with Cloud
Cloud Service Provider 2 External Infrastructure-as-a-Service cloud services provider Specialise in providing services to the regulated industries Fully compliant IT quality management system, trained staff and all IT infrastructure is fully qualified Significant experience with virtualised infrastructure and good track record in providing Infrastructure-as-a- Service to other life sciences companies Broad technical knowledge of most mainstream technologies and platforms
Cloud Service Provider 3 External Infrastructure-as-a-Service and Platform-as-a- Service cloud services provider Provide a broad range of software development tools, utilities and libraries as PaaS Capable of supporting developed applications using their own Infrastructure-as-a-Service solutions Do not specialise in supporting life sciences customers Staff have no GxP training IT infrastructure is not formally qualified Their IT quality management system is not based on any defined standard Limited experience deploying technology other than their own
Cloud Service Provider 4 External Infrastructure-as-a-Service and Software-as-a- Service cloud services provider Sell fully configurable versions of an ERP, CRM and EDMS application Also provision 3 applications as SaaS ERP with no configuration flexibility CRM with limited configuration flexibility EDMS with significant configuration flexibility Do not focus on Life Sciences industry Very professional, secure data centre with accredited IT QMS and security Staff have no GxP training IT infrastructure is not formally qualified
Cloud Service Provider 5 External IaaS, PaaS and SaaS cloud services provider Provide a broad range of software development tools, utilities and libraries as PaaS Capable of supporting developed applications using their own Infrastructure-as-a-Service solutions Provision a range of SaaS, developed using their own tools, including CRM with no configuration flexibility EDMS with no configuration flexibility Do not focus on Life Sciences industry But can provision separate Test/QA instance at additional cost New data centre No IT QMS Staff have no documented training IT infrastructure is not formally qualified
Feedback Each group to provide feedback What working assumptions did you make? What Cloud model(s) did you go for? If any What were the things you considered? What questions would you have asked? 23 rd April 2015, Chertsey 26
Discussion What are the issues to consider when developing a Cloud Strategy? Where do the following fit in? Functional risk Data integrity Different Cloud models The ability to conduct assessments / audits The role of preferred provider 23 rd April 2015, Chertsey 27
Thank You! 23rd April 2015, Chertsey 28