Appendix 4 to Contract C13/806 MONITORING AND REVIEW ARRANGEMENTS



Similar documents
Information Governance Policy

Information Governance Framework

TERMS OF REFERENCE: REVIEW OF THE INFORMATION GOVERNANCE TOOLKIT

Information Governance Strategy. Version No 2.0

Information Governance Strategy

Information Governance Policy

PPG & Survey Results Report 2014/15

COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS POLICY

Information Governance Management Framework

Information Governance Policy

Information Governance Strategy & Policy

Preparing an effective bid

Data Quality Policy SH NCP 2. Version: 5. Summary:

Human Services Quality Framework. User Guide

Information Governance Strategy. Version No 2.1

CCG CO02 Complaints Policy and Procedure

Information Governance and Management Standards for the Health Identifiers Operator in Ireland

Complaints Policy. Complaints Policy. Page 1

Management -Purpose of the Corporate Performance Report

Information Sharing Protocol

NHS Lanarkshire Information Governance Committee

THE FUNCTIONS OF CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUPS (UPDATED TO REFLECT THE FINAL HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE ACT 2012)

Nursing Agencies. Minimum Standards

Information Sharing Policy

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY

NHS North Durham Clinical Commissioning Group. Information Governance Strategy 2015/16

Final Version 1.0 December 2015

Public Records (Scotland) Act Healthcare Improvement Scotland and Scottish Health Council Assessment Report

INFORMATION SHARING 2 nd LEVEL PROTOCOL BETWEEN NHS Bristol CAREPLUS SYSTEM AND BCC CHILDREN S CENTRES

RTO Delegations Guidelines

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY

Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations

ST LAWRENCE ROAD SURGERY. Complaints Procedure General Practice

Information Governance Strategy :

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY

Information Governance Policy

How To Write A Complaint Policy And Procedure For The Northumberland Clinical Commissioning Group

CO02: COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Complaints that are not required to be considered under the arrangements

We ask that you contact our Privacy Officer in the event you have any questions or concerns regarding this Code or its implementation.

Fair and transparent pricing for NHS services

Information Governance Strategy and Policy. OFFICIAL Ownership: Information Governance Group Date Issued: 15/01/2015 Version: 2.

NHS Kernow Disclosure Log Freedom of Information Requests November 2014

Policy Document Control Page

Consultation on amendments to the Compliance Framework. Dated 31 January 2008

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED. Setting up an Information Sharing Agreement

COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS POLICY

National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare

Lancashire County Council Information Governance Framework

Information Governance Policy

Dealing With Information Rights Concerns

Joint Surrey Carers Commissioning Strategy for 2012/3 to 2014/5 Key Priorities for Surrey Multi Agency Delivery Plan - May 2012

Policies for: Information Governance Information Quality Information Management Information Security. Version Control Version: 0.1

An Approach to Records Management Audit

DATA PROTECTION CORPORATE POLICY

SOMERSET PARTNERSHIP NHS FOUNDATION TRUST RECORDS MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. Report to the Trust Board 22 September Information Governance Manager

Contents. Section/Paragraph Description Page Number

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE AND DATA PROTECTION POLICY


E2E Project Management Process Governance (Electric Capital)

Consultancy spending approval process: Initial guidance to NHS foundation trusts

Housing Case Management Service Specification

NHS Waltham Forest Clinical Commissioning Group Information Governance Strategy

CODE OF PRACTICE APPOINTMENT TO POSITIONS IN THE CIVIL SERVICE AND PUBLIC SERVICE MERIT PROBITY ACCOUNTABILITY

Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Guide

NHS Waltham Forest Clinical Commissioning Group Information Governance Policy

Page 5. The Adult Social Services and Health Committee. The Strategic Director of Adult Social Services, Housing and Health

F I N A N C I A L R E G U L A T I O N S

IP-PGN-14 Part of NTW(O)05 Incident Policy

Policy Information Management

(Health Scrutiny Sub-Committee 10 March 2008)

Risk. assessment framework. Risk. assessment framework Updated August

Business Continuity Policy and Business Continuity Management System

John Keel, CPA State Auditor. An Audit Report on Inspections of Compounding Pharmacies at the Board of Pharmacy. August 2015 Report No.

Service Quality and Reliability Performance Monitoring and Reporting for Regulated Rate Providers and Default Supply Providers

3 Guide to Monitor. Guide to Monitor For NHS foundation trust governors

APPROVED Sberbank Supervisory Board decision Minutes No. dated September Sberbank Corporate Secretary Regulations

Policy: D9 Data Quality Policy

RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY AND STRATEGY. Document Status: Draft. Approved by. Appendix 1. Originator: A Struthers. Updated: A Struthers

Quality Policy. JRI Orthopaedics Limited

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY

Strategic plan. Outline

Thresholds Guidance & Assessment Protocols. Statutory & Common Assessment Frameworks

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE STRATEGY

MOORLAND SURGICAL SUPPLIES LTD INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY

Quality Management Strategy

Dealing with Employee Claims

Information Governance Framework and Strategy. November 2014

INFORMATION SHARING AGREEMENT. Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT): Service Information Sharing

3.1 There are eight grade two and two grade three recommendations contained within the detailed findings section and action plan of this report.

COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORK AND REPORTING GUIDELINES

Information Governance Plan

Information Governance. and what it means for you

Procurement, Competition and Choice in the new healthcare landscape

Privacy in complaint handling systems

INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY

PERFORMANCE DATA QUALITY POLICY

Data Protection policy approved by the Governing Body of Ifield Community College. Ifield Community College Data Protection Policy

COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE ENGLAND BEAUFORT ROAD SURGERY INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

Appendix 4 to Contract C13/806 MONITORING AND REVIEW ARRANGEMENTS

CONTENTS Page 1. General Requirements... 4 2. Specific Monitoring Requirements... 4 Appendices Page 2 of 6

Page 3 of 6

1. General Requirements The Service Provider will assist the Council in monitoring and review of the Service by. developing and maintaining good working relationships with other service Providers, Local Authorities and Public Health Commissioners, local GP Practices and Clinical Commissioning Groups, Pharmacies, Acute Trusts, Health professionals, Voluntary and Community sector organisations and other statutory voluntary and private. 2. Specific Monitoring Requirements The service must comply with the Equality Act 2010. The service must comply with WCC Safeguarding Policies. The service should be accessible to wheel-chair users and other users with a physical disability. The service should be sensitive to the cultural needs and backgrounds of people in its local population and its Service Users. The Provider will have in place a plan for Quality Improvement setting out what actions will be taken to: improve Service User experience respond to complaints increase the proportion of Service Users accessing the service that successfully stop smoking ensure equity of access and outcomes The provider will be expected to develop and submit quarterly quality and performance reports to the, and offer a client/patient satisfaction questionnaire to all service users The provider will be required to submit a full and accurate activity report on a monthly basis to the Commissioner. This activity report will contain a record for each individual setting a quit date, with the service during the month and comprise a number of fields describing the service user, the service provided and the outcomes achieved. Sufficient information will be required to populate Dept. Of Health and Local Government reporting templates, evidence of activity and payment level due, and details of service provided. The dataset will be based on the current gold standard DH monitoring guidance. www.dh.gov.uk/en/.../publicationspolicyandguidance/dh_125389 All information recorded in order to report quit outcomes under this service specification is subject to the requirements set out in The Data Protection 1998, Freedom of Information Act, and in compliance with the Law. Providers are required to have nominated a Senior Information Risk Owner/Caldicott Guardian Providers will require access to the internet for the submission of data Summary of quality and performance indicators Indicator Measure Threshold Method of Measurement Service User Of all Service At least 90% Experience Users responding to the satisfaction question, the Consequence of breach explanation for failure to meet Page 4 of 6

Complaints Quit Rate % CO, cotinine or spirometry validation Equity of access Equity of attrition percentage reporting that they were satisfied with the service Number of complaints received Number of Service Users successfully quitting at 4 week follow-up as a percentage of all those setting a quit date Of Service Users who successfully quit at 4 or 12 weeks, the percentage whose smoking status was selfreported without an attempt to otherwise check smoking status via CO, cotinine or spirometry Of all Service Users setting a quit date, the percentage that are from black and minority ethnic Of all services users eligible for 4 week follow-up, the percentage from black and - Between 35%-70% No more than 15% Reflects background population Reflects equity of access measure submit monthly activity reports standard and planned corrective action plan to address issued raised in complaints request provider to submit service improvement plan if below 35% explanation for failure to meet standard and planned corrective action plans to improve take-up rates of black and plans to improve take-up rates of black and Page 5 of 6

Indicator Measure Threshold Method of Measurement Equity of Reflects equity of outcomes access measure Number of service users Of services users successfully quitting at 4 week follow-up, the percentage from black and Number of users accessing the service Minimum of 20 per year audit Provider record Consequence of breach plans to improve take-up rates of black and request plan to meet service requirement Provider is aware of and complies with local protocols Compliance with local protocols audit Provider record request explanation for failure to meet standard and planned corrective action 3. Specific Review Requirements The Service Provider will attend the following review meetings: 3.1 An annual Service Review with representatives of the Council's Joint Commissioning Unit, to be held within 3 months following each completed 12 month period. Page 6 of 6