Supplementary Appendix



Similar documents
October 12, Dear Health Care Provider:

Custom Report Data Elements: IT Database Fields. Source: American Hospital Association IT Survey

Health Information Technology in the United States: On the Cusp of Change, 2009

ONC Data Brief No. 9 March Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S. Non-federal Acute Care Hospitals:

Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S. Non-federal Acute Care Hospitals:

Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S. Non- Federal Acute Care Hospitals:

AHA Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement. Healthcare IT Database Download and Data Licensing

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE 2013 AHA ANNUAL SURVEY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPLEMENT

2014 AHA Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement Health Forum, L.L.C.

Health Information Technology in the United States: Information Base for Progress

Custom Report Data Elements: 2012 IT Database Fields. Source: American Hospital Association IT Survey

Status of Electronic Health Records in Missouri Hospitals HIDI SPECIAL REPORT JULY 2012

1. Introduction - Nevada E-Health Survey

How To Know The Current Status Of Health Information Technology In Rural Hospitals

Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits

Health Information Technology in the United States: Progress and Challenges Ahead, 2014

Web First. 2 Health Affairs MAY :5

Meaningful Use. Michael L. Brody, DPM FACFAOM CCHIT Ambulatory Workgroup HITSP Physician Perspective Technical Committee NYeHC

Health Information Technology and the National Quality Agenda. Daphne Ayn Bascom, MD PhD Chief Clinical Systems Officer Medical Operations

Abstract. Introduction. Number 22 n April 30, 2010

C A LIFORNIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION. s n a p s h o t The State of Health Information Technology in California

I. RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO THE TIMING OF STAGE 2

Practice Readiness Assessment

A Provider s Perspective on Electronic Health Record Systems Adoption in Small Practices

Health Information Exchange and Its Barriers to High Life Expectancy

Use of Electronic Health Records in Residential Care Communities

Physician s Guide to Certification for 08 EHRs

2008 Wisconsin Ambulatory Health Information Technology Survey

Medweb Telemedicine 667 Folsom Street, San Francisco, CA Phone: Fax:

Health Information Technology in the United States: Information Base for Progress. Executive Summary

Health Information Technology

Health Information Technology in the United States: Better Information Systems for Better Care, 2013

Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. Hospitals

The presentation will begin shortly.

1/16/2015 HOW CLINICAL EDUCATORS CAN DISCLOSURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES MAKE MEANINGFUL USE MEANINGFUL. We have no financial disclosures

County Director. Chief Information Officer. County Director

Any, Certified, and Basic: Quantifying Physician EHR Adoption through 2014

Maine Rural Health Research Center Research & Policy Brief

AHIC Transition Update

Meaningful Use: DEMO of a Practice. Michael J. Mirro, MD, FACC Medical Director : Parkview Research Center Electrophysiologist : PPG-Cardiology

Hospital IT Expenses and Budgets Related to Clinical Sophistication. Market Findings from HIMSS Analytics

How To Improve Health Information Technology

PRESENTER BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES

Electronic Health Records & Healthcare Information Technology in the United States, 2011

Better patient care and better practice management

Financial Incentives for EHR Use and The Washington- Idaho Regional Extension Center Program: WIREC

Use and Characteristics of Electronic Health Record Systems Among Office-based Physician Practices: United States,

EHR Meaningful Use Incentives for School-Based Health Clinics

Toward Meaningful Use of HIT

Adopting an EHR & Meaningful Use

IL-HITREC P.O. Box 755 Sycamore, IL Phone Fax

Minnesota Nursing Home Health Information Technology Survey Results

Meaningful Use for Physician Offices

Marriott Wardman Park Hotel, Washington, D.C Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Health Information Technology Initiative

OPTIMIZING THE USE OF YOUR ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD. A collaborative training offered by Highmark and the Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative

Mona Osman MD, MPH, MBA

United States HIT Case Study

Eligible Professional Menu Measure Frequently Asked Questions

Challenges with Meaningful Use EHR Satisfaction & Usability Diminishing

Meaningful Use in a Nutshell

Health Care Reform. Meaningful Use of HIT. Cut Cost. Best Practices & Quality Care. Expand Coverage to 32 million Americans.

Testimony to the Meaningful Use Workgroup, ONC. Panel 1: Current HIT Support of Care Coordination

HL7 & Meaningful Use. Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International. HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011

Meaningful Use. Goals and Principles

What GI Practices Need to Know About the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Joel V. Brill, MD, AGAF Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF

Outline. Vision for Delivering Quality Care Do the Right Thing. Lessons from Quality

A New Partnership: The Power of the Collaboration between CNIO and CNO to Maximize Nursing's Use of Technology within the Healthcare Enterprise

Latham & Watkins Corporate Department

Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society

Patient Management Systems. Terrence Adam, BS Pharm,, MD, PhD Assistant Professor, PCHS University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy

Electronic Medical Records

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 Summary of Proposed Rule (EP)

Some Tout CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Definition for Use of Electronic Health Records As Too Ambitious

Benefits and Risks of Electronic Health Records

1. What is your name? Last name First name Middle Initial Degree(s)

Dr. Peters has declared no conflicts of interest related to the content of his presentation.

Interoperability: White Paper. Introduction. PointClickCare Interoperability January 2014

Introduction to Health Insurance

May 15, 2013 Joint Committee on Finance Paper #363

2013 EHR Donation Program ELIGIBILITY FORM Doing business with HealthTronics Lab Solutions is NOT a condition of receiving a donation

June 10, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD

Reduction in Medication Errors due to Adoption of Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems

Analysis of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Usage in Texas Acute Care Hospitals

Meaningful Use Stage 2: Summary of Proposed Rule for Eligible Professionals (EPs) Wyatt Packer HIT Regional Extension Center (REC) HealthInsight

Main Line Health Community Physician EMR Program

Health Information Exchange (HIE) in Minnesota

The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality

RPMS EHR Remote Support and Configuration

MEANINGFUL USE : WHAT DOES IT MEAN? Marty Witrak Shirley Eichenwald Maki Ryan Sandefer

Summary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only)

VA Names Members of National Academic Affiliations Council Panel to Help Guide Improvements in Academic Partnerships

GTO LABS. Viewpoint: Electronic Health Records: History in the Making A SPACE FOR IDEAS

MEANINGFUL USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS: MEDICARE AND MEDICAID INCENTIVE PAYMENTS

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Meaningful Use and the Impact on Netsmart s Public Health Clients

How To Improve Health Care Technology In West Virginia

MN E-HEALTH REPORT: Chiropractic Offices Adoption and Use of EHRs and Exchange of Health Information (2011) April 2012

Health Information Technology: Introduction to One Key Part - the EHR

Draft 4th Annual HIT Summit Agenda

Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Transcription:

Supplementary Appendix This appendix has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Supplement to: Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1628-38. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0900592.

Appendix A: Questions from the survey used in the analysis 1. Does your hospital have a computerized system for: (Fully implemented means it has completely replaced paper record for the function) Electronic Clinical Documentation Fully Implemented Across All Units Fully Implemented in At Least One Unit Beginning to Implement in At Least One Unit (4) Have Resources to Implement in the Next Year (5) Do not have Resources but Considering Implementing (6) Not in Place and not Considering Implementing a. Patient Demographics b. Physician Notes c. Nursing Assessments d. Problem Lists e. Medication Lists f. Discharge Summaries g. Advanced Directives (i.e. DNR) Results Viewing a. Lab Reports b. Radiology Reports c. Radiology Images d. Diagnostic Test Results (e.g., EKG report, Echo report) e. Diagnostic Test Images (e.g., EKG tracing) f. Consultant Reports Computerized Provider Order Entry (Provider (e.g., MD, APN, NP) directly enters own orders) a. Laboratory Tests b. Radiology Tests c. Medications d. Consultation Requests e. Nursing Orders Decision Support a. Clinical Guidelines (e.g., Beta blockers post-mi, ASA in CAD b. Clinical Reminders (e.g., pneumovax) c. Drug Allergy Alerts d. Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts e. Drug-Lab Interaction Alerts f. Drug Dosing Support (e.g., renal dose guidance) Bar Coding a. Laboratory specimens b. Tracking pharmaceuticals c. Pharmaceutical administration d. Supply chain management e. Patient ID Other Functionalities a. Telemedicine b. Radio Frequency ID c. Physician Use of Personal Data Assistant 1

Please answer regardless of whether or not your hospital has implemented an EHR system. If your hospital has implemented an EHR system, please tell us how much of a barrier each of the following was to implementation. If your hospital has NOT implemented an EHR, please indicate how much of a barrier it is to implementation, even if you have no immediate plans to implement a system. a. The amount of capital needed to purchase and implement an EHR b. Uncertainty about the return on investment (ROI) from an EHR c. Concerns about the ongoing cost of maintaining an EHR system d. Resistance to implementation from physicians e. Resistance to implementation from other providers (e.g., RNs, NPs, Pas) f. Lack of capacity to select, contract for, and implement an EHR g. Disruption in clinical care during implementation h. Lack of adequate IT staff i. Concerns about inappropriate disclosure of patient information j. Concerns about the legality of donating a system to associated physician k. Concerns about illegal record tampering or hacking l. Finding an EHR system that meets your organization s needs m. Lack of interoperable IT systems in the market place n. Concerns about a lack of future support from vendors for upgrading and maintaining the system Not a The table below lists potential policy solutions for suspected barriers to a hospital s implementation of an EHR. If your hospital HAS NOT implemented an EHR system please rate the impact that the proposed change in policy would have on your hospital s decision to implement an EHR. Please indicate whether the impact would be positive or negative. If your hospital HAS implemented an EHR, please rate the impact of the proposed change in policy on EHR implementation among hospitals generally. Please indicate whether the impact would be positive or negative. a. Change the law to protect physicians from personal liability for record tampering by external parties or for privacy and security braches Positive Positive No (4) Negative (5) Negative b. Future HIPAA claims attachment c. Published lists of certified EHRs to assure presence of necessary capabilities and functions d. Objective evaluations of EHR capabilities and implementation experiences ( consumer reports for EHRs) e. Technical assistance for implementation and process change f. Incentives for the purchase and implementation of an EHR (e.g., tax credits, low interest loans, grants) g. Additional reimbursement for the use of an EHR 2

Appendix B: Adoption of basic and comprehensive EHR systems, adjusted for hospital characteristics Have Comprehensive Have Basic* Have No Over-all P-value Hospital Size Percent (Standard Error) Small (6-99 beds) 1.5 (0.5) 6.3 (0.9) 92.1 (1.0) Size Medium (100 beds -399 beds) 1.6 (0.3) 7.4 (0.8) 91.1 (0.8) Large (400+ beds) 1.8 (0.8) 9.3 (2.0) 88.9 (2.3) Region Northeast 1.1 (0.5) 6.6 (1.1) 92.3 (1.2) Midwest 1.8 (0.4) 6.8 (0.8) 91.4 (0.9) South 1.3 (0.4) 7.8 (0.8) 90.8 (0.9) West 1.8 (0.6) 7.4 (1.2) 90.8 (1.3) For-profit hospitals 1.0 (0.4) 5.0 (1.1) 94.0 (1.2) Private non-profit hospitals 1.5 (0.3) 8.0 (0.7) 90.5 (0.7) Public hospitals 2.7 (0.7) 6.9 (1.1) 90.5 (1.3) Teaching Hospitals 1.9 (0.9) 13.8 (3.0) 84.4 (3.1) Teaching 1.8 (0.7) 8.7 (1.4) 89.4 (1.5) Non-Teaching 1.4 (0.3) 6.1 (0.6) 92.5 (0.6) Member of a System 2.3 (0.5) 7.8 (0.8) 89.9 (0.9) Not a member of a system 1.0 (0.2) 6.7 (0.6) 92.3 (0.7) Urban hospitals 1.8 (0.3) 7.8 (0.6) 90.3 (0.6) Rural hospitals 0.7 (0.3) 5.2 (1.1) 94.2 (1.1) Hospitals with CCU 1.5 (0.4) 7.0 (0.8) 91.4 (0.9) Hospitals without CCU 1.4 (0.3) 7.4 (0.7) 91.2 (0.7) 0.07 0.84 0.08 0.03 0.008 0.01 0.57 3

Appendix C: Expert Consensus Panel Carmella Bocchino, R.N., M.B.A. Senior Vice President, Medical Affairs America's Health Insurance Plans Paul Cleary, Ph.D. Dean of Public Health Yale School of Medicine Francois debrantes National Coordinator Bridges To Excellence Terry Hammons, M.D., S.M. Sr. VP, Research and Information Medical Group Management Association Bernard L. Hengesbaugh, M.B.A. Chief Operating Officer American Medical Association Kevin Kearns, M.B.A. President & CEO Health Choice Network, Inc. Mark Leavitt, M.D., Ph.D. Chair, CCHIT Michael W. Painter, J.D., M.D. Senior Program Officer The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Mark V. Pauly, Ph.D. Bendheim Professor Health Care Systems Department The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Mary A. Pittman, Dr.P.H. President Health Research & Educational Trust Sarah Hudson Scholle, M.P.H., Dr.P.H. National Committee for Quality Assurance Bruce Siegel, M.D., M.P.H Research Professor Department of Health Policy George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services Paul Tang, M.D. Palo Alto Medical Foundation John R. Lumpkin, M.D., M.P.H. Senior Vice President and Director Health Care Group The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Sally C. Morton, Ph.D. Vice President for Statistics & Epidemiology RTI International Please note that the affiliations were correct at the time of their participation. Not all members participated in the selection of criteria for EHR adoption. 4