2007 to 2011. Motor Vehicle Fatalities in British Columbia: Statistics

Similar documents
Speeding. Probability of death at different impact speeds

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

The total number of traffic collisions in Saskatchewan is up 5% from 51,733 in 2008 to 54,229 in 2009.

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2008 June 2012 (All ages) Mode of travel

Traffic Safety Facts. Children Data. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children from 2 to 14 years old.

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

2. Road Traffic Accident Conditions During 2009

Road Safety Authority Provisional Review of Road Crashes 2013

PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCIDENT DATA. Irene Isaksson-Hellman If Insurance Company P&C Ltd.

Motorcycle Related Crash Victims (What the Statistics Say) Mehdi Nassirpour Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Safety

Traffic Collision Statistics Report

For further information contact: Alberta Transportation Office of Traffic Safety Main Floor, Twin Atria Building Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T6B

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION

Oxfordshire Local Transport Plan Revised April Objective 3 Reduce casualties and the dangers associated with travel

MISSOURI TRAFFIC SAFETY COMPENDIUM

For further information contact: Alberta Transportation Office of Traffic Safety Main Floor, Twin Atria Building Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T6B

HAPPY MOTORING IN QUÉBEC!

INCREASING MOTORCYCLE HELMET USE

Iowa CODES Fact Sheet 1. Traumatic Brain Injuries Caused by Motor Vehicle Crash (MVC)

Strategic Highway Safety Plan

Bicycle Crash Data 2012

CHAPTER 1 Land Transport

OREGON TRAFFIC ACCIDENT AND INSURANCE REPORT

Bicycle Crash Data 2013

Motor Vehicle Collisions in Eastern Ontario. Supplement to the Eastern Ontario Health Unit Injury Report

Car occupants intoxication and non-use of safety belts

How To Know If A Motorcyclist Is Safe

DMV. OREGON TRAFFIC ACCIDENT AND INSURANCE REPORT Tear this sheet off your report, read and carefully follow the directions.

OHIO. T r a f f i c C r a s h F a c t s. 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2011. All Counties. for the County(s)

ITSMR Research Note. Cell Phone Use and Other Driver Distractions: A Status Report KEY FINDINGS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION.

2015 National Law Enforcement Challenge Application

How To Understand The Safety Of A Motorcycle

Per vehicle mile traveled, motorcyclists were more than 26 times more likely than passenger car occupants to die in a traffic crash.

How To Know If You Are Distracted By Cell Phones

Montana Traffic Safety Problem Identification FFY 2011

Traffic Safety Facts 2008 Data

Safe Transportation System. Tangible Result Driver Leanna Depue, Highway Safety Director

Relative risk of fatal crash by blood alcohol level BAC (mg/100ml)

Road fatalities in 2012

DOT HS December 2013

DOT HS December Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview ,000. Fatality Rate per 100M VMT

Miles to go: F ocusing on Risks for Teen Driver Crashes

Talking Points. About Roadway Users

How To Know How Many People Die In A Car Crash

How To Know If You Can Ride A Motorcycle

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Alcohol-Impaired Driving Data

Appendix 1: ICD 10 AM (6th Edition) Cause of Injury Code and Description

SECTION 3.2: MOTOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC CRASHES

Year Fatalities Injuries

road safety issues 2001 road toll for the WBOP/Tauranga Police area JULY 2002 Regional crash causes Major road safety issues:

Community Motor Vehicle Collision Priority Setting Toolkit Part One

Children and road safety: a guide for parents

CHART OF MOVING VIOLATIONS

ALCOHOL AND DRUGS IN ROAD CRASHES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA

POLICY SEAT BELTS IMPACT{ National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

Road fatalities in Road fatality: person killed in a traffic crash or deceased because of an injury within 30 days after the crash.

road safety issues 2001 road toll for the Bay of Plenty Police district JULY 2002 Regional crash causes Major road safety issues:

Traffic Safety Facts. Alcohol-Impaired Driving Data. Overview. Key Findings

Michigan Traffic Crash Facts

Accident configurations and injuries for bicyclists based on the German In-Depth Accident Study. Chiara Orsi

BACKGROUND. National. Cell Phone Use and Text Messaging


FMCSA Webinar Nov.18th to Examine Large Truck Crash Fatalities Involving Pedestrians & Bicyclists. New Technology for Better Fleet Management

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STRATEGY YORK REGIONAL POLICE. Road Safety It s In Your Hands

Suggestions for Using Crash Facts


PART I TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS

Injury indicators: A validation tool. Road safety indicator specifications

Bike Laws: Massachusetts

New York Study of Booster Seat Effects on Injury Reduction Compared to Safety Belts in Children Aged 4-8 in Motor Vehicle Crashes

Facts About Car Seat Safety in BC

FFY 2016 PROPOSAL. Contact Information. Surprise Police Department ADDRESS W. Statler Plaza, #103

The spectrum of motorcycle research in Maryland

Program Descriptions:

DOT HS October 2001

How To Know If A Cyclist Is Safe

Transcription:

Motor Vehicle Fatalities in British Columbia: Statistics 27 to 211 October 212 RAD 212-16 Web www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/ Twitter http://twitter.com/roadsafetybc You Tube www.youtube.com/roadsafetybcgov

Contents Introduction and Definitions... 3 Fatal Victims by Month... 4 Fatal Victims by Region... 5 Fatal Victims by Crash at Intersections or Non-intersections... 6 Fatal Victims by Age Range... 7 Fatal Victims by Role and Gender... 8 Fatal Victims Motorcyclists... 9 Unrestrained Fatal Victims... 1 Fatal Victims of Crashes Involving Heavy Vehicles... 11 Fatal Victims of Crashes Involving Impairment... 12 Fatal Victims of Crashes Involving Speed... 13 Fatal Victims of Crashes Involving Distraction... 14 October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 2 of 14

Introduction and Definitions This report presents the preliminary count of fatal victims of motor vehicle crashes in British Columbia for the period 27 to 211. The report will be updated two times per year. British Columbia s Traffic Accident System compiles information on all traffic collisions reported in the Province (police reports and self-reports). Information on traffic collisions supports road safety programs, enforcement campaigns, policy development, and it is used to evaluate provincial road safety initiatives such as the Immediate Roadside Prohibitions for impaired driving. The fatality data presented in this report is based on a reconciliation of police data, coroner s data and RCMP data. Fatality data usually require at least one year to settle. Therefore, counts for 211 should be considered preliminary. If a few late cases are reported, the numbers will be updated in subsequent reports, on a bi-annual basis. This will not affect the general trends. Definitions: Fatality: A fatality refers to a road user who died within 3 days after an injury sustained in a collision involving at least one motor vehicle on a 'highway' as defined in the Motor Vehicle Act (largely any public roadway). The Motor Vehicle Act does not apply to forestservice roads, industrial roads and private driveways. Fatal victims of off-road snowmobile accidents, homicides, or suicides are excluded from this report. Road User: Is a driver, passenger, pedestrian or cyclist who is travelling on a highway as defined in the Motor Vehicle Act. Notes about the data: Data as of June 3, 211. Traffic Accident data is gathered from reports completed by police or submitted by individuals to police. The data is entered and reconciled in the Traffic Accident System. Data has been reconciled with the B.C. Coroner s data and the RCMP data. When comparing this edition with future editions, counts may differ due to further development of data, rounding, late reporting or corrections. Long-term trends may differ from the trends presented on the graphs. Unknown or other is listed when data was missing or incomplete. Because of rounding, averages may not add up. October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 3 of 14

Number of fatal victims Fatal Victims by Month Table 1: Fatal victims by month * average** January 31 25 19 29 22 26 February 2 3 29 29 15 25 March 29 29 23 21 2 25 April 27 15 22 25 16 21 May 38 28 23 2 15 25 June 27 3 39 43 31 34 July 48 45 37 32 34 4 August 32 37 39 45 3 37 September 44 28 28 33 34 34 October 42 26 3 28 28 31 November 28 25 38 31 23 29 December 45 36 36 28 23 34 Total per Year 411 354 363 364 291 357 *Counts are preliminary. ** Fatal victim averages are rounded up to the next unit. Figure 1: Fatal victims by month 6 5 4 3 2 1 October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 4 of 14

Number of fatal victims Fatal Victims by Region Table 2: Fatal victims by region * average** Greater Vancouver 71 53 37 35 33 46 Fraser Valley 87 8 75 87 51 76 Vancouver Island 61 52 58 59 37 54 Southern Interior 121 14 133 112 18 116 North Central 71 64 6 71 62 66 Unknown 1 1 British Columbia Total 411 354 363 364 291 357 *Counts are preliminary. ** Fatal victim averages are rounded up to the next unit. British Columbia s regions include the following: - Vancouver Island: Encompasses the Gulf Islands and the Mainland coastal community of Powell River. - Southern Interior: Includes the southern third of the province, including the Kamloops area, the Okanagan and Kootenay regions, as far west as Boston Bar and Lillooet. - North Central: Includes the Central Interior as far south as 1 Mile House, the Peace River district, Prince Rupert and Haida Gwaii, and all points north. Figure 2: Fatal victims by region 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 27 28 29 21 211 Greater Vancouver Fraser Valley Vancouver Island Southern Interior North Central October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 5 of 14

Number of fatal victims Fatal Victims by Crash at Intersections and Non-intersections Table 3: Fatal victims by crash at intersections and non-intersections * average** At Intersection*** 78 67 85 62 66 72 Not at Intersection 333 287 278 32 225 285 *Counts are preliminary. ** Fatal victim averages are rounded up to the next unit. *** Fatal victim was in a crash at an intersection. Figure 3: Fatal victims by crash at intersections and non-intersections 35 3 25 2 15 1 27 28 29 21 211 5 At Intersection Not at Intersection October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 6 of 14

Number of fatal victims Fatal Victims by Age Range Table 4: Fatal victims by age range * Average** -3 3 6 1 2 4-7 3 4 1 2 2 8-12 6 4 3 3 6 5 13-15 2 4 3 8 4 16-18 27 25 21 13 13 2 19-21 35 23 18 24 21 25 22-25 39 38 31 22 26 32 26-35 51 47 45 54 39 48 36-45 69 54 64 48 3 53 46-55 69 48 69 72 45 61 56-65 37 48 37 43 44 42 66-75 23 21 2 27 22 23 75 + 36 32 49 39 37 39 Other 14 6 4 5 6 *Counts are preliminary. ** Fatal victim averages are rounded up to the next unit. Note: Child fatalities on private driveways are not included in those statistics. Figure 4: Fatal victims by age range 12 1 8 6 4 2 27 28 29 21 211-15 16-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 66-75 75 + Other Age categories October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 7 of 14

Number of fatal victims Fatal Victims by Role and Gender Table 5: Fatal victims by role and gender * average** Driver*** Female 52 55 48 49 34 48 Male 189 159 175 158 126 162 Unknown Passenger Female 5 36 36 46 33 41 Male 37 36 33 46 32 37 Unknown Cyclist Female 2 1 2 1 2 Male 8 8 8 6 6 8 Unknown Pedestrian Female 25 22 2 3 21 24 Male 47 34 38 28 35 37 Unknown 1 1 Other Female 1 1 1 Male 2 3 1 2 Unknown 1 1 1 *Counts are preliminary. ** Fatal victim averages are rounded up to the next unit. *** Includes motorcyclist drivers. Figure 5: Fatal victims by role and gender 25 2 15 1 5 27 28 29 21 211 Driver* Passenger Cyclist Pedestrian Other * Includes motorcyclists drivers October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 8 of 14

Percent of all fatal victims Number of fatal victims Fatal Victims Motorcyclists Table 6: Fatal victims motorcyclists Motorcycle driver or passenger*** * Average** 48 39 47 36 37 42 Non Motorcyclists 363 315 316 328 254 316 *Counts are preliminary. ** Fatal victim averages are rounded up to the next unit. *** Includes motorcycles and moped. Figure 6: Fatal victims motorcyclists 6 5 4 3 2 1 Note: Any trend (increase / decrease) should be considered within the context of Figure 1 (overall fatal victims over time). Figure 7: Fatal victims motorcyclists as a proportion of all fatal victims 2% 18% 16% 14% 12% 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % 12.9% 11.7% 12.7% 11.% 9.9% October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 9 of 14

Percent of all fatal victims Number of fatal victims Table 7: Unrestrained fatal victims Unrestrained Fatal Victims * Average** Unrestrained*** 15 85 66 89 51 8 Restrained 36 269 297 275 24 278 *Counts are preliminary. ** Fatal victim averages are rounded up to the next unit. *** Fatal victim was not wearing a restraint (seatbelt, lap belt, infant /child restraint system, booster seat). Figure 8: Unrestrained fatal victims 12 1 8 6 4 2 Note: Any trend (increase / decrease) should be considered within the context of Figure 1 (overall fatal victims over time). Figure 9: Unrestrained fatal victims as a proportion of all fatal victims 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 25.5% 24.% 18.2% 24.5% 17.5% 5% % October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 1 of 14

Percent of all fatal victims Number of fatal victims Fatal Victims of Crashes Involving Heavy Vehicles Table 8: Fatal victims of crashes involving heavy vehicles * Average** Heavy vehicles*** involved 72 63 73 59 71 68 Heavy vehicles NOT involved 339 291 29 35 22 289 *Counts are preliminary. ** Fatal victim averages are rounded up to the next unit. *** Heavy vehicles include: single unit truck / heavy (code 21); combination unit truck / light (code 3); comb unit truck / heavy (code 31); combination unit tractor / trailer (code 32); combination unit tractor/trailer & pup [4-wheel trailer] (code 33); log truck & pole trailer (code 34); tow truck (code 35); combination unit truck/pull trailer/5 th wheeler (code 36); bus - local transit (code 41); bus - intercity (code 42); road construction (grader, paver, roller) (code 91); general construction (code 92); mobile crane (code 94). Figure 1: Fatal victims of crashes involving heavy vehicles 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Note: Any trend (increase / decrease) should be considered within the context of Figure 1 (overall fatal victims over time). Figure 11: Fatal victims of crashes involving heavy vehicles as a proportion of all fatal victims 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 17.5% 17.8% 2.1% 16.2% 24.4% 5% % October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 11 of 14

Percent of all fatal victims Number of fatal victims Fatal Victims of Crashes Involving Impairment Table 9: Fatal victims of crashes involving impairment * average** Impairment*** 144 112 16 126 73 113 Impairment NOT involved 267 242 257 238 218 245 *Counts are preliminary. ** Fatal victim averages are rounded up to the next unit. *** Fatal victims where one or more of the following contributing factors was assigned to the entities involved in the crash: alcohol involvement (code 1); ability impaired by alcohol (code 8); alcohol suspected (code 81); drugs illegal (code 15); ability impaired by drugs (code 82); drugs suspected (code 83); and ability impaired by medication (code 84). Up to 4 different contributing factors may be assigned to each entity (vehicle, motorcycle, cyclist or pedestrian) involved in a motor vehicle crash. Therefore some victims in this table may be included in the other contributing factors tables on this document (tables 9 to 11). Figure 12: Fatal victims of crashes involving impairment 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Note: Any trend (increase / decrease) should be considered within the context of Figure 1 (overall fatal victims over time). Figure 13: Fatal victims of crashes involving impairment as a proportion of all fatal victims 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 35.% 31.6% 29.2% 34.6% 25.1% 5% % October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 12 of 14

Percent of all fatal victims Number of fatal victims Fatal Victims of Crashes Involving Speed Table 1: Fatal victims of crashes involving speed * Average** Speed*** 167 133 133 113 96 129 Speed NOT involved 244 221 23 251 195 229 *Counts are preliminary. ** Fatal victim averages are rounded up to the next unit. *** Fatal victims where one or more of the following contributing factors was assigned to the entities involved in the crash: unsafe speed (code 31); exceeding speed limit (code 35); excessive speed over 4 km/h (code 36); and driving too fast for conditions (code 37). Up to 4 different contributing factors may be assigned to each entity (vehicle, motorcycle, cyclist or pedestrian) involved in a motor vehicle crash. Therefore some victims in this table may be included in the other contributing factors tables on this document (tables 9 to 11). Figure 14: Fatal victims of crashes involving speed 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Note: Any trend (increase / decrease) should be considered within the context of Figure 1 (overall fatal victims over time). Figure 15: Fatal victims of crashes involving speed as a proportion of all fatal victims 5% 45% 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% % 4.6% 37.6% 36.6% 31.% 33.% October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 13 of 14

Percent of all fatal victims Number of fatal victims Fatal Victims of Crashes Involving Distraction Table 11: Fatal victims of crashes involving distraction * average** Inattention/Distraction*** 98 91 99 1 79 94 Inattention/Distraction NOT involved 313 263 264 264 212 264 *Counts are preliminary. ** Fatal victim averages are rounded up to the next unit. *** Fatal victims where one or more of the following contributing factors was assigned to the entities involved in the crash: communication/video equipment (code 34), driver inattentive (code 85), and driver internal/external distraction (code 86). Driver inattentive (code 85) represents the majority of these three codes. Up to 4 different contributing factors may be assigned to each entity (vehicle, motorcycle, cyclist or pedestrian) involved in a motor vehicle crash. Therefore some victims in this table may be included in other contributing factors tables on this document (tables 9 to 11). Figure 16: Fatal victims of crashes involving distraction 12 1 8 6 4 2 Note: Any trend (increase / decrease) should be considered within the context of Figure 1 (overall fatal victims over time). Figure 17: Fatal victims of crashes involving distraction as a proportion of all fatal victims 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 23.8% 25.7% 27.3% 27.5% 27.1% 5% % October 17, 212 RAD 212-16 Page 14 of 14